Datasets:
mtc
/
multirc_train_merged

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
document
stringlengths
29
1.23k
summary
stringlengths
19
538
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| "You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men.
What prompted Judge Megan Lake Thornton to make the statement: "You can't have it both ways. Obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| "The reality is it's easy to say they should never have contact," said Sherry Currens, executive director of the Kentucky Domestic Violence Association, an advocacy and legal protection group.
What prompted Judge Megan Lake Thornton to make the statement: "You can't have it both ways. Obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men
Kentucky officials say there is a virtual epidemic of abusive relationships in the state. ||||| It's pretty hard to say, `Never speak again.'
What prompted Judge Megan Lake Thornton to make the statement: "You can't have it both ways. Obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| "You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men.
What prompted Judge Megan Lake Thornton to make the statement: "You can't have it both ways. For returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| "The reality is it's easy to say they should never have contact," said Sherry Currens, executive director of the Kentucky Domestic Violence Association, an advocacy and legal protection group.
What prompted Judge Megan Lake Thornton to make the statement: "You can't have it both ways. For returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them
Kentucky officials say there is a virtual epidemic of abusive relationships in the state. ||||| It's pretty hard to say, `Never speak again.'
What prompted Judge Megan Lake Thornton to make the statement: "You can't have it both ways. For returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| "You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men.
What prompted Judge Megan Lake Thornton to make the statement: "You can't have it both ways. The women requested a restraint, and then contacted the men after ignoring the order
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| "The reality is it's easy to say they should never have contact," said Sherry Currens, executive director of the Kentucky Domestic Violence Association, an advocacy and legal protection group.
What prompted Judge Megan Lake Thornton to make the statement: "You can't have it both ways. The women requested a restraint, and then contacted the men after ignoring the order
Kentucky officials say there is a virtual epidemic of abusive relationships in the state. ||||| It's pretty hard to say, `Never speak again.'
What prompted Judge Megan Lake Thornton to make the statement: "You can't have it both ways. The women requested a restraint, and then contacted the men after ignoring the order
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal To hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them
Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it. ||||| "It drives me nuts when people just decide to do whatever they want," said Judge Thornton, who is experienced in the state's thick domestic abuse docket, which produces close to 30,000 emergency protective orders a year.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal To hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them
"But we're talking about people in long-term relationships. ||||| The ruling stunned Cindra Walker, the lawyer for the two women, who is with Central Kentucky Legal Services, which represents many of the thousands of indigent women caught in abusive relationships.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal To hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal That these orders are mutually binding
Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it. ||||| "It drives me nuts when people just decide to do whatever they want," said Judge Thornton, who is experienced in the state's thick domestic abuse docket, which produces close to 30,000 emergency protective orders a year.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal That these orders are mutually binding
"But we're talking about people in long-term relationships. ||||| The ruling stunned Cindra Walker, the lawyer for the two women, who is with Central Kentucky Legal Services, which represents many of the thousands of indigent women caught in abusive relationships.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal That these orders are mutually binding
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal Cindra Walke
Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it. ||||| "It drives me nuts when people just decide to do whatever they want," said Judge Thornton, who is experienced in the state's thick domestic abuse docket, which produces close to 30,000 emergency protective orders a year.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal Cindra Walke
"But we're talking about people in long-term relationships. ||||| The ruling stunned Cindra Walker, the lawyer for the two women, who is with Central Kentucky Legal Services, which represents many of the thousands of indigent women caught in abusive relationships.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal Cindra Walke
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal The ruling to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them
Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it. ||||| "It drives me nuts when people just decide to do whatever they want," said Judge Thornton, who is experienced in the state's thick domestic abuse docket, which produces close to 30,000 emergency protective orders a year.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal The ruling to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them
"But we're talking about people in long-term relationships. ||||| The ruling stunned Cindra Walker, the lawyer for the two women, who is with Central Kentucky Legal Services, which represents many of the thousands of indigent women caught in abusive relationships.
What ruling made by Judge Thornton are advocates for battered women planning to appeal The ruling to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| "You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men.
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Contempt of court and a $100 and $200 fine
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| But Judge Thornton declared in court, "When these orders are entered, you don't just do whatever you damn well please and ignore them."
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Contempt of court and a $100 and $200 fine
It's pretty hard to say, `Never speak again.' ||||| They may love the partner.
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Contempt of court and a $100 and $200 fine
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| "You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men.
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Contempt of court
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| But Judge Thornton declared in court, "When these orders are entered, you don't just do whatever you damn well please and ignore them."
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Contempt of court
It's pretty hard to say, `Never speak again.' ||||| They may love the partner.
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Contempt of court
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| "You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men.
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Cited them for contempt
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| But Judge Thornton declared in court, "When these orders are entered, you don't just do whatever you damn well please and ignore them."
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Cited them for contempt
It's pretty hard to say, `Never speak again.' ||||| They may love the partner.
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Cited them for contempt
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| "You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men.
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Fined them
The violent arena of domestic abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of court for returning to men who had been ordered to stay away from them. ||||| But Judge Thornton declared in court, "When these orders are entered, you don't just do whatever you damn well please and ignore them."
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Fined them
It's pretty hard to say, `Never speak again.' ||||| They may love the partner.
What punishment did judge Megan Lake Thornton give to Cindra Walker's clients Fined them
They may have children in common. ||||| They may love the partner.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders They may have children in common and They may love the partner
They may love the partner. ||||| Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders They may have children in common and They may love the partner
"You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men. ||||| "For over five years, I've been in court practically every day on these abuse cases," Ms. Walker said, "and I've never before had a victim threatened with contempt."
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders They may have children in common and They may love the partner
They may have children in common. ||||| They may love the partner.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Financial difficulties
They may love the partner. ||||| Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Financial difficulties
"You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men. ||||| "For over five years, I've been in court practically every day on these abuse cases," Ms. Walker said, "and I've never before had a victim threatened with contempt."
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Financial difficulties
They may have children in common. ||||| They may love the partner.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Economic and family dependency
They may love the partner. ||||| Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Economic and family dependency
"You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men. ||||| "For over five years, I've been in court practically every day on these abuse cases," Ms. Walker said, "and I've never before had a victim threatened with contempt."
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Economic and family dependency
They may have children in common. ||||| They may love the partner.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Children in common
They may love the partner. ||||| Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Children in common
"You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men. ||||| "For over five years, I've been in court practically every day on these abuse cases," Ms. Walker said, "and I've never before had a victim threatened with contempt."
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Children in common
They may have children in common. ||||| They may love the partner.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Finances
They may love the partner. ||||| Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Finances
"You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men. ||||| "For over five years, I've been in court practically every day on these abuse cases," Ms. Walker said, "and I've never before had a victim threatened with contempt."
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Finances
They may have children in common. ||||| They may love the partner.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Children
They may love the partner. ||||| Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered women, who plan to appeal it.
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Children
"You can't have it both ways," said Judge Megan Lake Thornton of Fayette County District Court in recently fining two women $100 and $200 respectively for obtaining protective orders forbidding their partners from contacting them, then relenting and contacting the men. ||||| "For over five years, I've been in court practically every day on these abuse cases," Ms. Walker said, "and I've never before had a victim threatened with contempt."
What are two of the reasons Sherry Currens gives for people violating protective orders Children
The lower classes had no hope of gaining more than minimal wealth, while the upper classes found it crass, vulgar, and unbecoming of their sort to care about something as unseemly as money; many were virtually guaranteed wealth and took it for granted. ||||| At the same time in America, workers would see people fashioned in exquisite attire and merely proclaim that through hard work they too would soon possess the fortune necessary to enjoy such luxuries.
How were the American lower class's views of wealth and fine possessions different from those of the European lower class American lower classes aspired to improvements and luxury enjoyment through hard work while European lower classes had no hope of gaining more than minimal wealth
At the same time in America, workers would see people fashioned in exquisite attire and merely proclaim that through hard work they too would soon possess the fortune necessary to enjoy such luxuries. ||||| Legislatures abolished primogeniture and entails, resulting in more widely distributed land holdings.
How were the American lower class's views of wealth and fine possessions different from those of the European lower class American lower classes aspired to improvements and luxury enjoyment through hard work while European lower classes had no hope of gaining more than minimal wealth
In Tocqueville's mind, this explained why America was so different from Europe. ||||| Despite maintaining with Aristotle, Montesquieu, and others that the balance of property determined the balance of power, Tocqueville argued that, as America showed, equitable property holdings did not ensure the rule of the best men.
How were the American lower class's views of wealth and fine possessions different from those of the European lower class American lower classes aspired to improvements and luxury enjoyment through hard work while European lower classes had no hope of gaining more than minimal wealth
The lower classes had no hope of gaining more than minimal wealth, while the upper classes found it crass, vulgar, and unbecoming of their sort to care about something as unseemly as money; many were virtually guaranteed wealth and took it for granted. ||||| At the same time in America, workers would see people fashioned in exquisite attire and merely proclaim that through hard work they too would soon possess the fortune necessary to enjoy such luxuries.
How were the American lower class's views of wealth and fine possessions different from those of the European lower class European lower class people had no belief that they could gain wealth, whereas Americans believed they could if they worked hard
At the same time in America, workers would see people fashioned in exquisite attire and merely proclaim that through hard work they too would soon possess the fortune necessary to enjoy such luxuries. ||||| Legislatures abolished primogeniture and entails, resulting in more widely distributed land holdings.
How were the American lower class's views of wealth and fine possessions different from those of the European lower class European lower class people had no belief that they could gain wealth, whereas Americans believed they could if they worked hard
In Tocqueville's mind, this explained why America was so different from Europe. ||||| Despite maintaining with Aristotle, Montesquieu, and others that the balance of property determined the balance of power, Tocqueville argued that, as America showed, equitable property holdings did not ensure the rule of the best men.
How were the American lower class's views of wealth and fine possessions different from those of the European lower class European lower class people had no belief that they could gain wealth, whereas Americans believed they could if they worked hard
The lower classes had no hope of gaining more than minimal wealth, while the upper classes found it crass, vulgar, and unbecoming of their sort to care about something as unseemly as money; many were virtually guaranteed wealth and took it for granted. ||||| At the same time in America, workers would see people fashioned in exquisite attire and merely proclaim that through hard work they too would soon possess the fortune necessary to enjoy such luxuries.
How were the American lower class's views of wealth and fine possessions different from those of the European lower class They could make money via hard work versus in europe no one cared about making money
At the same time in America, workers would see people fashioned in exquisite attire and merely proclaim that through hard work they too would soon possess the fortune necessary to enjoy such luxuries. ||||| Legislatures abolished primogeniture and entails, resulting in more widely distributed land holdings.
How were the American lower class's views of wealth and fine possessions different from those of the European lower class They could make money via hard work versus in europe no one cared about making money
In Tocqueville's mind, this explained why America was so different from Europe. ||||| Despite maintaining with Aristotle, Montesquieu, and others that the balance of property determined the balance of power, Tocqueville argued that, as America showed, equitable property holdings did not ensure the rule of the best men.
How were the American lower class's views of wealth and fine possessions different from those of the European lower class They could make money via hard work versus in europe no one cared about making money
Legislatures abolished primogeniture and entails, resulting in more widely distributed land holdings. ||||| This was a contrast to the general aristocratic pattern in which only the eldest child, usually a man, inherited the estate, which had the effect of keeping large estates intact from generation to generation. ||||| In America, in contrast, landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child by the action of primogeniture, which meant that as time went by, large estates became broken up within a few generations which, in turn, made the children more equal overall.
Why were the children of American elites more equal to non-elite children than were the children of European elites Because landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child through primogeniture
In America, in contrast, landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child by the action of primogeniture, which meant that as time went by, large estates became broken up within a few generations which, in turn, made the children more equal overall. ||||| Tocqueville asserted that the values that had triumphed in the North and were present in the South had begun to suffocate old-world ethics and social arrangements. ||||| In fact, it did quite the opposite.
Why were the children of American elites more equal to non-elite children than were the children of European elites Because landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child through primogeniture
The widespread, relatively equitable property ownership which distinguished America and determined its mores and values also explained why the American masses held elites in such contempt. ||||| Despite maintaining with Aristotle, Montesquieu, and others that the balance of property determined the balance of power, Tocqueville argued that, as America showed, equitable property holdings did not ensure the rule of the best men. ||||| In Europe, he claimed, nobody cared about making money.
Why were the children of American elites more equal to non-elite children than were the children of European elites Because landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child through primogeniture
Legislatures abolished primogeniture and entails, resulting in more widely distributed land holdings. ||||| This was a contrast to the general aristocratic pattern in which only the eldest child, usually a man, inherited the estate, which had the effect of keeping large estates intact from generation to generation. ||||| In America, in contrast, landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child by the action of primogeniture, which meant that as time went by, large estates became broken up within a few generations which, in turn, made the children more equal overall.
Why were the children of American elites more equal to non-elite children than were the children of European elites American government abolished primogeniture which made it harder for elites to pass down land and wealth
In America, in contrast, landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child by the action of primogeniture, which meant that as time went by, large estates became broken up within a few generations which, in turn, made the children more equal overall. ||||| Tocqueville asserted that the values that had triumphed in the North and were present in the South had begun to suffocate old-world ethics and social arrangements. ||||| In fact, it did quite the opposite.
Why were the children of American elites more equal to non-elite children than were the children of European elites American government abolished primogeniture which made it harder for elites to pass down land and wealth
The widespread, relatively equitable property ownership which distinguished America and determined its mores and values also explained why the American masses held elites in such contempt. ||||| Despite maintaining with Aristotle, Montesquieu, and others that the balance of property determined the balance of power, Tocqueville argued that, as America showed, equitable property holdings did not ensure the rule of the best men. ||||| In Europe, he claimed, nobody cared about making money.
Why were the children of American elites more equal to non-elite children than were the children of European elites American government abolished primogeniture which made it harder for elites to pass down land and wealth
Legislatures abolished primogeniture and entails, resulting in more widely distributed land holdings. ||||| This was a contrast to the general aristocratic pattern in which only the eldest child, usually a man, inherited the estate, which had the effect of keeping large estates intact from generation to generation. ||||| In America, in contrast, landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child by the action of primogeniture, which meant that as time went by, large estates became broken up within a few generations which, in turn, made the children more equal overall.
Why were the children of American elites more equal to non-elite children than were the children of European elites Because in America Legislatures abolished primogeniture and entails, resulting in more widely distributed land holdings
In America, in contrast, landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child by the action of primogeniture, which meant that as time went by, large estates became broken up within a few generations which, in turn, made the children more equal overall. ||||| Tocqueville asserted that the values that had triumphed in the North and were present in the South had begun to suffocate old-world ethics and social arrangements. ||||| In fact, it did quite the opposite.
Why were the children of American elites more equal to non-elite children than were the children of European elites Because in America Legislatures abolished primogeniture and entails, resulting in more widely distributed land holdings
The widespread, relatively equitable property ownership which distinguished America and determined its mores and values also explained why the American masses held elites in such contempt. ||||| Despite maintaining with Aristotle, Montesquieu, and others that the balance of property determined the balance of power, Tocqueville argued that, as America showed, equitable property holdings did not ensure the rule of the best men. ||||| In Europe, he claimed, nobody cared about making money.
Why were the children of American elites more equal to non-elite children than were the children of European elites Because in America Legislatures abolished primogeniture and entails, resulting in more widely distributed land holdings
This rapidly democratizing society, as Tocqueville understood it, had a population devoted to "middling" values which wanted to amass, through hard work, vast fortunes. ||||| In Tocqueville's mind, this explained why America was so different from Europe. ||||| In Europe, he claimed, nobody cared about making money.
How did Europeans' and Americans' attitudes toward amassing wealth differ Americans devoted to "middling values" of wanting to make fortune through hard work while Europeans did not care about making money with static classes
This rapidly democratizing society, as Tocqueville understood it, had a population devoted to "middling" values which wanted to amass, through hard work, vast fortunes. ||||| This was a contrast to the general aristocratic pattern in which only the eldest child, usually a man, inherited the estate, which had the effect of keeping large estates intact from generation to generation. ||||| It was not always a negative development, according to Joshua Kaplan's interpretation of Tocqueville, since bonds of affection and shared experience between children often replaced the more formal relation between the eldest child and the siblings, characteristic of the previous aristocratic pattern.
How did Europeans' and Americans' attitudes toward amassing wealth differ Americans devoted to "middling values" of wanting to make fortune through hard work while Europeans did not care about making money with static classes
In America, in contrast, landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child by the action of primogeniture, which meant that as time went by, large estates became broken up within a few generations which, in turn, made the children more equal overall. ||||| The widespread, relatively equitable property ownership which distinguished America and determined its mores and values also explained why the American masses held elites in such contempt. ||||| It was not always a negative development, according to Joshua Kaplan's interpretation of Tocqueville, since bonds of affection and shared experience between children often replaced the more formal relation between the eldest child and the siblings, characteristic of the previous aristocratic pattern.
How did Europeans' and Americans' attitudes toward amassing wealth differ Americans devoted to "middling values" of wanting to make fortune through hard work while Europeans did not care about making money with static classes
This rapidly democratizing society, as Tocqueville understood it, had a population devoted to "middling" values which wanted to amass, through hard work, vast fortunes. ||||| In Tocqueville's mind, this explained why America was so different from Europe. ||||| In Europe, he claimed, nobody cared about making money.
How did Europeans' and Americans' attitudes toward amassing wealth differ Europeans had no interest in it, while Americans desired it
This rapidly democratizing society, as Tocqueville understood it, had a population devoted to "middling" values which wanted to amass, through hard work, vast fortunes. ||||| This was a contrast to the general aristocratic pattern in which only the eldest child, usually a man, inherited the estate, which had the effect of keeping large estates intact from generation to generation. ||||| It was not always a negative development, according to Joshua Kaplan's interpretation of Tocqueville, since bonds of affection and shared experience between children often replaced the more formal relation between the eldest child and the siblings, characteristic of the previous aristocratic pattern.
How did Europeans' and Americans' attitudes toward amassing wealth differ Europeans had no interest in it, while Americans desired it
In America, in contrast, landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child by the action of primogeniture, which meant that as time went by, large estates became broken up within a few generations which, in turn, made the children more equal overall. ||||| The widespread, relatively equitable property ownership which distinguished America and determined its mores and values also explained why the American masses held elites in such contempt. ||||| It was not always a negative development, according to Joshua Kaplan's interpretation of Tocqueville, since bonds of affection and shared experience between children often replaced the more formal relation between the eldest child and the siblings, characteristic of the previous aristocratic pattern.
How did Europeans' and Americans' attitudes toward amassing wealth differ Europeans had no interest in it, while Americans desired it
This rapidly democratizing society, as Tocqueville understood it, had a population devoted to "middling" values which wanted to amass, through hard work, vast fortunes. ||||| In Tocqueville's mind, this explained why America was so different from Europe. ||||| In Europe, he claimed, nobody cared about making money.
How did Europeans' and Americans' attitudes toward amassing wealth differ Europeans left their wealth to the eldest, americans split it up
This rapidly democratizing society, as Tocqueville understood it, had a population devoted to "middling" values which wanted to amass, through hard work, vast fortunes. ||||| This was a contrast to the general aristocratic pattern in which only the eldest child, usually a man, inherited the estate, which had the effect of keeping large estates intact from generation to generation. ||||| It was not always a negative development, according to Joshua Kaplan's interpretation of Tocqueville, since bonds of affection and shared experience between children often replaced the more formal relation between the eldest child and the siblings, characteristic of the previous aristocratic pattern.
How did Europeans' and Americans' attitudes toward amassing wealth differ Europeans left their wealth to the eldest, americans split it up
In America, in contrast, landed elites were less likely to pass on fortunes to a single child by the action of primogeniture, which meant that as time went by, large estates became broken up within a few generations which, in turn, made the children more equal overall. ||||| The widespread, relatively equitable property ownership which distinguished America and determined its mores and values also explained why the American masses held elites in such contempt. ||||| It was not always a negative development, according to Joshua Kaplan's interpretation of Tocqueville, since bonds of affection and shared experience between children often replaced the more formal relation between the eldest child and the siblings, characteristic of the previous aristocratic pattern.
How did Europeans' and Americans' attitudes toward amassing wealth differ Europeans left their wealth to the eldest, americans split it up
When a stream or river slows down, it starts dropping its sediments. ||||| Larger sediments are dropped in steep areas.
Where do larger sediments get dropped when a river or stream slows down Steep areas
When a stream or river slows down, it starts dropping its sediments. ||||| Some smaller sediments can still be carried by a slow moving stream or river.
Where do larger sediments get dropped when a river or stream slows down Steep areas
Deposition also occurs when a stream or river empties into a large body of still water. ||||| Some smaller sediments can still be carried by a slow moving stream or river.
Where do larger sediments get dropped when a river or stream slows down Steep areas
When a stream or river slows down, it starts dropping its sediments. ||||| Larger sediments are dropped in steep areas.
Where do larger sediments get dropped when a river or stream slows down Larger sediments are dropped in steep areas
When a stream or river slows down, it starts dropping its sediments. ||||| Some smaller sediments can still be carried by a slow moving stream or river.
Where do larger sediments get dropped when a river or stream slows down Larger sediments are dropped in steep areas
Deposition also occurs when a stream or river empties into a large body of still water. ||||| Some smaller sediments can still be carried by a slow moving stream or river.
Where do larger sediments get dropped when a river or stream slows down Larger sediments are dropped in steep areas
Deposition also occurs when a stream or river empties into a large body of still water. ||||| In this case, a delta forms.
When is a delta formed When a stream or river empties into a large body of still water
In this case, a delta forms. ||||| The stream comes to a stop rapidly.
When is a delta formed When a stream or river empties into a large body of still water
It spreads out into the body of water. ||||| Alluvial Fans In arid regions, a mountain stream may flow onto flatter land.
When is a delta formed When a stream or river empties into a large body of still water
Deposition also occurs when a stream or river empties into a large body of still water. ||||| In this case, a delta forms.
When is a delta formed A delta is formed as deposition occurs when a river or stream empties into a larger body of water
In this case, a delta forms. ||||| The stream comes to a stop rapidly.
When is a delta formed A delta is formed as deposition occurs when a river or stream empties into a larger body of water
It spreads out into the body of water. ||||| Alluvial Fans In arid regions, a mountain stream may flow onto flatter land.
When is a delta formed A delta is formed as deposition occurs when a river or stream empties into a larger body of water
Deposition also occurs when a stream or river empties into a large body of still water. ||||| In this case, a delta forms.
When is a delta formed Deposition also occurs when a stream or river empties into a large body of still water
In this case, a delta forms. ||||| The stream comes to a stop rapidly.
When is a delta formed Deposition also occurs when a stream or river empties into a large body of still water
It spreads out into the body of water. ||||| Alluvial Fans In arid regions, a mountain stream may flow onto flatter land.
When is a delta formed Deposition also occurs when a stream or river empties into a large body of still water
When a stream or river slows down, it starts dropping its sediments. ||||| The stream comes to a stop rapidly. ||||| The deposits form an alluvial fan. ||||| Deposition also occurs when a stream or river empties into a large body of still water.
What is the process of dropping sediments by a stream or river called Deposition
The deposits form an alluvial fan. ||||| Larger sediments are dropped in steep areas. ||||| A delta is shaped like a triangle. ||||| In this case, a delta forms.
What is the process of dropping sediments by a stream or river called Deposition
In this case, a delta forms. ||||| A delta is shaped like a triangle. ||||| Alluvial Fans In arid regions, a mountain stream may flow onto flatter land. ||||| Some smaller sediments can still be carried by a slow moving stream or river.
What is the process of dropping sediments by a stream or river called Deposition
Larger sediments are dropped in steep areas. ||||| Smaller sediments are dropped as the slope becomes less steep.
Are larger sediments dropped in steeper or less steep areas than smaller sediments in the same stream Steeper
Larger sediments are dropped in steep areas. ||||| It spreads out into the body of water.
Are larger sediments dropped in steeper or less steep areas than smaller sediments in the same stream Steeper
When a stream or river slows down, it starts dropping its sediments. ||||| Deposition also occurs when a stream or river empties into a large body of still water.
Are larger sediments dropped in steeper or less steep areas than smaller sediments in the same stream Steeper
Larger sediments are dropped in steep areas. ||||| Smaller sediments are dropped as the slope becomes less steep.
Are larger sediments dropped in steeper or less steep areas than smaller sediments in the same stream Steeper areas