document
stringlengths 29
1.23k
| summary
stringlengths 19
538
|
|---|---|
Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs ||||| Opposition to the organization has cooled since 1996, when Congress approved restrictions (PL 104-134) on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take.
|
What types of cases were prohibited by PL 104-134 Representing illegal aliens or prisoners
|
Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
What types of cases were prohibited by PL 104-134 Representing illegal aliens or prisoners
|
5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly. ||||| Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC.
|
What types of cases were prohibited by PL 104-134 Representing illegal aliens or prisoners
|
Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs ||||| Opposition to the organization has cooled since 1996, when Congress approved restrictions (PL 104-134) on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take.
|
What types of cases were prohibited by PL 104-134 Lobbying, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, abortion-related litigation, illegal alien and prisoner representation, and defense of those evicted from federal housing due to the sale of drugs
|
Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
What types of cases were prohibited by PL 104-134 Lobbying, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, abortion-related litigation, illegal alien and prisoner representation, and defense of those evicted from federal housing due to the sale of drugs
|
5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly. ||||| Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC.
|
What types of cases were prohibited by PL 104-134 Lobbying, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, abortion-related litigation, illegal alien and prisoner representation, and defense of those evicted from federal housing due to the sale of drugs
|
Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
The Senate's onetime added contribution of $19 million to the LSC budget will go towards helping what cause The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households
|
The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households. ||||| If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding.
|
The Senate's onetime added contribution of $19 million to the LSC budget will go towards helping what cause The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households
|
If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding. ||||| If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy.
|
The Senate's onetime added contribution of $19 million to the LSC budget will go towards helping what cause The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households
|
Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
The Senate's onetime added contribution of $19 million to the LSC budget will go towards helping what cause Helping Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts
|
The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households. ||||| If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding.
|
The Senate's onetime added contribution of $19 million to the LSC budget will go towards helping what cause Helping Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts
|
If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding. ||||| If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy.
|
The Senate's onetime added contribution of $19 million to the LSC budget will go towards helping what cause Helping Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts
|
If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy. ||||| 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
|
Which political party cut the LSC's budget Republican
|
If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
Which political party cut the LSC's budget Republican
|
The federal government began funding some programs to provide legal assistance to the poor in the late 1960s; the Legal Services Corporation was created in 1974 (PL 93-355). ||||| If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding.
|
Which political party cut the LSC's budget Republican
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million.
|
List the current budget of the LSC, and the budget with the addition of the onetime increase $348 million
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
|
List the current budget of the LSC, and the budget with the addition of the onetime increase $348 million
|
Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC. ||||| LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four.
|
List the current budget of the LSC, and the budget with the addition of the onetime increase $348 million
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million.
|
List the current budget of the LSC, and the budget with the addition of the onetime increase The current budget is $329 million and the increase would bring it to $348 million
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
|
List the current budget of the LSC, and the budget with the addition of the onetime increase The current budget is $329 million and the increase would bring it to $348 million
|
Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC. ||||| LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four.
|
List the current budget of the LSC, and the budget with the addition of the onetime increase The current budget is $329 million and the increase would bring it to $348 million
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy.
|
What organization did Congress approve restriction on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take The Legal Services Corp. (LSC)
|
If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy. ||||| If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding.
|
What organization did Congress approve restriction on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take The Legal Services Corp. (LSC)
|
Opposition to the organization has cooled since 1996, when Congress approved restrictions (PL 104-134) on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take. ||||| 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
|
What organization did Congress approve restriction on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take The Legal Services Corp. (LSC)
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy.
|
What organization did Congress approve restriction on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take LSC
|
If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy. ||||| If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding.
|
What organization did Congress approve restriction on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take LSC
|
Opposition to the organization has cooled since 1996, when Congress approved restrictions (PL 104-134) on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take. ||||| 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
|
What organization did Congress approve restriction on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take LSC
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
|
Republicans cut which organization's budget deeply in 1996 The Legal Services Corp
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million.
|
Republicans cut which organization's budget deeply in 1996 The Legal Services Corp
|
Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs ||||| If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding.
|
Republicans cut which organization's budget deeply in 1996 The Legal Services Corp
|
Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs ||||| If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy. ||||| Opposition to the organization has cooled since 1996, when Congress approved restrictions (PL 104-134) on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take. ||||| 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
|
What actions taken toward the LSC makes us think the view of the LSC might be a politically motivated one Spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government
|
5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly. ||||| LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four. ||||| Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million. ||||| (1996 Almanac, p.
|
What actions taken toward the LSC makes us think the view of the LSC might be a politically motivated one Spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government
|
If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding. ||||| The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
What actions taken toward the LSC makes us think the view of the LSC might be a politically motivated one Spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government
|
Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs ||||| If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy. ||||| Opposition to the organization has cooled since 1996, when Congress approved restrictions (PL 104-134) on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take. ||||| 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
|
What actions taken toward the LSC makes us think the view of the LSC might be a politically motivated one It says opposition was happening, but the opposition cooled after their budget was cut, and many types of cases were no longer allowed to be handled by LSC funded legal aid
|
5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly. ||||| LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four. ||||| Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million. ||||| (1996 Almanac, p.
|
What actions taken toward the LSC makes us think the view of the LSC might be a politically motivated one It says opposition was happening, but the opposition cooled after their budget was cut, and many types of cases were no longer allowed to be handled by LSC funded legal aid
|
If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding. ||||| The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
What actions taken toward the LSC makes us think the view of the LSC might be a politically motivated one It says opposition was happening, but the opposition cooled after their budget was cut, and many types of cases were no longer allowed to be handled by LSC funded legal aid
|
LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four. ||||| Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC. ||||| The federal government began funding some programs to provide legal assistance to the poor in the late 1960s; the Legal Services Corporation was created in 1974 (PL 93-355).
|
Provide the year in which the LSC was created and a summary of its services A quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor
|
Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC. ||||| If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding. ||||| Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million.
|
Provide the year in which the LSC was created and a summary of its services A quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households. ||||| Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs
|
Provide the year in which the LSC was created and a summary of its services A quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor
|
LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four. ||||| Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC. ||||| The federal government began funding some programs to provide legal assistance to the poor in the late 1960s; the Legal Services Corporation was created in 1974 (PL 93-355).
|
Provide the year in which the LSC was created and a summary of its services It was created in 1974 to provide funding to states for families who need civil legal services but are under 125% of the federal poverty line. They help in domestic abuse, custody matters, and other matters
|
Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC. ||||| If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding. ||||| Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million.
|
Provide the year in which the LSC was created and a summary of its services It was created in 1974 to provide funding to states for families who need civil legal services but are under 125% of the federal poverty line. They help in domestic abuse, custody matters, and other matters
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households. ||||| Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs
|
Provide the year in which the LSC was created and a summary of its services It was created in 1974 to provide funding to states for families who need civil legal services but are under 125% of the federal poverty line. They help in domestic abuse, custody matters, and other matters
|
The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001. ||||| Opposition to the organization has cooled since 1996, when Congress approved restrictions (PL 104-134) on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take.
|
Opposition to which organization has cooled since 1996 The Legal Services Corp
|
Opposition to the organization has cooled since 1996, when Congress approved restrictions (PL 104-134) on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take. ||||| 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
|
Opposition to which organization has cooled since 1996 The Legal Services Corp
|
Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million. ||||| Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs
|
Opposition to which organization has cooled since 1996 The Legal Services Corp
|
If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
What organization redistributed its funding based on census counts in Ohio and Michigan The Legal Services Corp
|
The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households. ||||| The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001.
|
What organization redistributed its funding based on census counts in Ohio and Michigan The Legal Services Corp
|
(1996 Almanac, p. ||||| If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding.
|
What organization redistributed its funding based on census counts in Ohio and Michigan The Legal Services Corp
|
If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
What organization redistributed its funding based on census counts in Ohio and Michigan LSC
|
The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households. ||||| The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001.
|
What organization redistributed its funding based on census counts in Ohio and Michigan LSC
|
(1996 Almanac, p. ||||| If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding.
|
What organization redistributed its funding based on census counts in Ohio and Michigan LSC
|
If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
What has happened to the LSC's funding since the 1996 budget cut Slow recovery
|
The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households. ||||| Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC.
|
What has happened to the LSC's funding since the 1996 budget cut Slow recovery
|
Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC. ||||| LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four.
|
What has happened to the LSC's funding since the 1996 budget cut Slow recovery
|
If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy. ||||| The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
|
What has happened to the LSC's funding since the 1996 budget cut Its funding has recovered slowly
|
The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households. ||||| Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC.
|
What has happened to the LSC's funding since the 1996 budget cut Its funding has recovered slowly
|
Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC. ||||| LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four.
|
What has happened to the LSC's funding since the 1996 budget cut Its funding has recovered slowly
|
Recommendation: The U.S. government must define what the message is, what it stands for. ||||| We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour The U. S. Government
|
We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors. ||||| America and its friends have a crucial advantage-we can offer these parents a vision that might give their children a better future.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour The U. S. Government
|
To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death. ||||| America's policy choices have consequences.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour The U. S. Government
|
Recommendation: The U.S. government must define what the message is, what it stands for. ||||| We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour Us
|
We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors. ||||| America and its friends have a crucial advantage-we can offer these parents a vision that might give their children a better future.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour Us
|
To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death. ||||| America's policy choices have consequences.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour Us
|
Recommendation: The U.S. government must define what the message is, what it stands for. ||||| We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour U.S. Government
|
We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors. ||||| America and its friends have a crucial advantage-we can offer these parents a vision that might give their children a better future.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour U.S. Government
|
To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death. ||||| America's policy choices have consequences.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour U.S. Government
|
Recommendation: The U.S. government must define what the message is, what it stands for. ||||| We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour American citizens
|
We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors. ||||| America and its friends have a crucial advantage-we can offer these parents a vision that might give their children a better future.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour American citizens
|
To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death. ||||| America's policy choices have consequences.
|
Who should be generous and caring to their neighbour American citizens
|
Recommendation: The U.S. government must define what the message is, what it stands for. ||||| We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Treating people humanely
|
We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors. ||||| To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Treating people humanely
|
If we heed the views of thoughtful leaders in the Arab and Muslim world, a moderate consensus can be found. ||||| That does not mean U.S. choices have been wrong.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Treating people humanely
|
Recommendation: The U.S. government must define what the message is, what it stands for. ||||| We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Show generousity to and care for neighbors
|
We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors. ||||| To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Show generousity to and care for neighbors
|
If we heed the views of thoughtful leaders in the Arab and Muslim world, a moderate consensus can be found. ||||| That does not mean U.S. choices have been wrong.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Show generousity to and care for neighbors
|
Recommendation: The U.S. government must define what the message is, what it stands for. ||||| We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Us
|
We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors. ||||| To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Us
|
If we heed the views of thoughtful leaders in the Arab and Muslim world, a moderate consensus can be found. ||||| That does not mean U.S. choices have been wrong.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Us
|
Recommendation: The U.S. government must define what the message is, what it stands for. ||||| We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl The U.S. government
|
We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors. ||||| To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl The U.S. government
|
If we heed the views of thoughtful leaders in the Arab and Muslim world, a moderate consensus can be found. ||||| That does not mean U.S. choices have been wrong.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl The U.S. government
|
Recommendation: The U.S. government must define what the message is, what it stands for. ||||| We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Abide by the rule of law
|
We should offer an example of moral leadership in the world, committed to treat people humanely, abide by the rule of law, and be generous and caring to our neighbors. ||||| To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Abide by the rule of law
|
If we heed the views of thoughtful leaders in the Arab and Muslim world, a moderate consensus can be found. ||||| That does not mean U.S. choices have been wrong.
|
Should offer an example of moral leadership in the worl Abide by the rule of law
|
To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death. ||||| America and its friends have a crucial advantage-we can offer these parents a vision that might give their children a better future.
|
Which parents can be offered a vision that might give their children a better future Muslim parents
|
America and its friends have a crucial advantage-we can offer these parents a vision that might give their children a better future. ||||| Right or wrong, it is simply a fact that American policy regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and American actions in Iraq are dominant staples of popular commentary across the Arab and Muslim world.
|
Which parents can be offered a vision that might give their children a better future Muslim parents
|
How can the United States and its friends help moderate Muslims combat the extremist ideas? ||||| American foreign policy is part of the message.
|
Which parents can be offered a vision that might give their children a better future Muslim parents
|
To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death. ||||| America and its friends have a crucial advantage-we can offer these parents a vision that might give their children a better future.
|
Which parents can be offered a vision that might give their children a better future Moderate Muslims
|
America and its friends have a crucial advantage-we can offer these parents a vision that might give their children a better future. ||||| Right or wrong, it is simply a fact that American policy regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and American actions in Iraq are dominant staples of popular commentary across the Arab and Muslim world.
|
Which parents can be offered a vision that might give their children a better future Moderate Muslims
|
How can the United States and its friends help moderate Muslims combat the extremist ideas? ||||| American foreign policy is part of the message.
|
Which parents can be offered a vision that might give their children a better future Moderate Muslims
|
To Muslim parents, terrorists like Bin Laden have nothing to offer their children but visions of violence and death. ||||| America and its friends have a crucial advantage-we can offer these parents a vision that might give their children a better future.
|
Which parents can be offered a vision that might give their children a better future American parents
|
America and its friends have a crucial advantage-we can offer these parents a vision that might give their children a better future. ||||| Right or wrong, it is simply a fact that American policy regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and American actions in Iraq are dominant staples of popular commentary across the Arab and Muslim world.
|
Which parents can be offered a vision that might give their children a better future American parents
|
How can the United States and its friends help moderate Muslims combat the extremist ideas? ||||| American foreign policy is part of the message.
|
Which parents can be offered a vision that might give their children a better future American parents
|
"There has been a transition and [the clinic] has helped to fill some void," said Deni Butler, administrator for the Eastern District Superior Court. ||||| "But we are working together quite nicely contrary to what the other side issue is."
|
Who made the following remark?: "But we are working together quite nicely contrary to what the other side issue is. Administrator for the Eastern District Superior Court
|
"There has been a transition and [the clinic] has helped to fill some void," said Deni Butler, administrator for the Eastern District Superior Court. ||||| After learning of the effort, Dudovitz sent personnel to staff the clinic for three hours per week and is helping to write a grant application to fund a self-help kiosk for Pomona patterned on the center he pioneered in Van Nuys.
|
Who made the following remark?: "But we are working together quite nicely contrary to what the other side issue is. Administrator for the Eastern District Superior Court
|
"They really screwed us. ||||| The help, although late, has earned Dudovitz some appreciation.
|
Who made the following remark?: "But we are working together quite nicely contrary to what the other side issue is. Administrator for the Eastern District Superior Court
|
"There has been a transition and [the clinic] has helped to fill some void," said Deni Butler, administrator for the Eastern District Superior Court. ||||| "But we are working together quite nicely contrary to what the other side issue is."
|
Who made the following remark?: "But we are working together quite nicely contrary to what the other side issue is. Deni Butler
|
"There has been a transition and [the clinic] has helped to fill some void," said Deni Butler, administrator for the Eastern District Superior Court. ||||| After learning of the effort, Dudovitz sent personnel to staff the clinic for three hours per week and is helping to write a grant application to fund a self-help kiosk for Pomona patterned on the center he pioneered in Van Nuys.
|
Who made the following remark?: "But we are working together quite nicely contrary to what the other side issue is. Deni Butler
|
"They really screwed us. ||||| The help, although late, has earned Dudovitz some appreciation.
|
Who made the following remark?: "But we are working together quite nicely contrary to what the other side issue is. Deni Butler
|
An observer familiar with the reconfiguration debate who requested anonymity wondered why Dudovitz had not spent more time mending fences. ||||| "He ought to be bending over backwards for reconciliation, but if you want to do impact work and people in the San Gabriel Valley want direct services, you have to accommodate that or change your approach," the observer said.
|
An observer stated: "He ought to be bending over backwards for reconciliation." Who is the observer referring to Neal Dudovitz
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.