File size: 2,571 Bytes
fde8c9e 275f045 fde8c9e 275f045 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 | ---
pretty_name: CocoGlide
task_categories:
- image-classification
- image-segmentation
- image-to-image
tags:
- image-forgery-detection
- image-manipulation-localization
- synthetic-image-detection
- diffusion-inpainting
- GLIDE
- COCO
---
# CocoGlide Dataset Card
## Dataset Description
This dataset is a reformatted version of **CocoGlide**, a local image forgery detection and localization dataset associated with the paper **TruFor: Leveraging All-Round Clues for Trustworthy Image Forgery Detection and Localization**.
CocoGlide is built from images in the MS-COCO validation set. The fake images are generated by applying **GLIDE-based text-guided inpainting** to local image regions. Each manipulated image is paired with a binary localization mask indicating the forged region.
The dataset can be used for both:
- **Image-level forgery detection**, where the goal is to classify whether an image is real or fake.
- **Pixel-level forgery localization**, where the goal is to predict the manipulated region.
## Dataset Structure
Each sample contains the following fields:
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| `key` | string | Sample identifier or image path |
| `image` | image | Input image |
| `mask` | image | Binary forgery localization mask |
| `label` | int | Image-level label, where `0` means real and `1` means fake |
| `prompt` | string or null | Text prompt/category used for GLIDE inpainting; `null` for real images |
## Label Definition
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| `0` | Real image |
| `1` | GLIDE-inpainted fake image |
For real images, the corresponding mask should be treated as an all-zero mask.
## Intended Use
This dataset is intended for research on:
- Image forgery detection
- Image manipulation localization
- AI-generated image detection
- Diffusion-based inpainting forgery detection
- Robustness evaluation of forensic models
Typical evaluation settings include:
- Image-level metrics: Accuracy, AUC, AP, F1
- Pixel-level metrics: F1, IoU, AUC, localization AP
## Source Paper
This dataset should be cited through the following paper:
```bibtex
@InProceedings{Guillaro_2023_CVPR,
author = {Guillaro, Fabrizio and Cozzolino, Davide and Sud, Avneesh and Dufour, Nicholas and Verdoliva, Luisa},
title = {TruFor: Leveraging All-Round Clues for Trustworthy Image Forgery Detection and Localization},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},
month = {June},
year = {2023},
pages = {20606--20615}
} |