ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_1048 | 0 | Reserved on 25th August 2022 and pronounced on 26th August 2022. The petition is presented through Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Mr. Bankim Garg, Mr. Shakaib Khan, Mr. Rachit Wadhwa and Ms. Nikita Salwan, Advocates, versus the respondents. The respondents are represented through Mr. Chetan Sharma, Additional Solicitor General wi... |
id_1048 | 1 | Regarding the Assessment/Examination as per different situations, the relevant portion of the circular is extracted below: \6. Assessment / Examination as per different situations A. In case the situation of the pandemic improves and students are able to come to schools or centres for taking the exams. Board would cond... |
id_1049 | 0 | Whether the 103rd Constitution Amendment can be said to breach the basic structure of the Constitution by permitting the State to make special provisions, including reservation, based on economic criteria? Whether the 103rd Constitution Amendment can be said to breach the basic structure of the Constitution by permitti... |
id_105 | 0 | Criminal Appeal No. 2136 of 2010 Jagtar Singh Appellant Versus State of Punjab Respondent Rajesh Bindal, J. The appellant has challenged his conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He was convicted by the Trial Court vide judgment dated 5 August 2005. His conviction was upheld by the High Court of Punj... |
id_1051 | 0 | The petitioner, who is working as a Senior Executive Engineer at the fourth respondent – Semiconductor Technology and Applied Research Centre (STARC), is before the Supreme Court of India aggrieved by the communication dated 07-08-2021 at Annexure CC and the communication dated 27-11-2021 at Annexure GG. She is seeking... |
id_1052 | 0 | Mahesh Kariman Tirki, age about 22 years, occupation Agriculturist, resident of Murewada, Taluka Etapalli, District Gadchiroli. Pandu Pora Narote, age about 27 years, occupation Agriculturist, resident of Murewada, Taluka Etapalli, District Gadchiroli. Hem Keshavdatta Mishra, age about 32 years, occupation Education, r... |
id_1052 | 1 | In determining whether any error, omission or irregularity in any proceeding under the Code of Criminal Procedure, or any error or irregularity in any sanction for the prosecution has occasioned a failure of justice, the Special Court shall have regard to the fact whether the objection could and should have been raised... |
id_1052 | 2 | Having regard to the language used under Sub-clause (2), though the reasons are not required, but the independent authority is certainly expected to at least communicate in brief as to what prompted the authority to make the recommendation. It was an important facet of the process of sanction which has to be passed to ... |
id_1052 | 3 | The decision was rendered in the context of the provisions of Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act pertaining to previous sanction for prosecution. Notably, Sub‑clause (3) to Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act is a specific provision to cure or save any error, omission or irregularity in the sanct... |
id_1052 | 4 | In case the sanction is found to be invalid the Supreme Court of India can discharge the accused relegating the parties to a stage where the competent authority may grant a fresh sanction for the prosecution in accordance with law. If the Trial Court proceeds, despite the invalidity attached to the sanction order, the ... |
id_1052 | 5 | The very intent of the legislature is to give primacy to the provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), meaning thereby it shall be followed in a stricter sense. The principle expressed in the maxim *generalia specialibus non derogant* applies, i.e., if a special provision has been made in a certain... |
id_1052 | 6 | The defence has strongly assailed the seizure itself by making a variety of submissions. Apart from violation of various statutory safeguards provided under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, it is canvassed that the arrest of accused numbers 1 to 5 itself is not free from doubt. It is their defence that accused... |
id_1052 | 7 | |
id_1052 | 8 | Merely because he has signed the panchnama, it does not mean that the seizure was legal and valid as required under the law. At most, it can only be inferred that the copy of seizure panchnama was provided to Accused No.6 G.N. Saibaba and nothing beyond that. The defence has seriously challenged the credibility of the ... |
id_1052 | 9 | Trustworthiness is to be judged in the context of the entire prosecution case, because the confession must fit into the proved facts and shall not run contrary to them. Retracted confession, however, stands on a slightly different footing. There is no embargo on the Supreme Court of India to take into account the retra... |
id_1052 | 10 | The prosecution further relied on decisions in cases of Bhaskar Ramappa Madar, Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade, Jagir Singh Baljit Singh, Krishna Gopal and Valson, however, after considering those decisions in case of Bhaskar Ramappa Madar and others Vs. State of Karnataka (2009) 11 Supreme Court Cases 690; Shivaji Sahabrao Bo... |
id_1052 | 11 | As regards applicant Sushma, she was staying in the same room where the accused No. 1 Angela was staying and, as aforesaid, a number of articles alleged to be publicity materials or literature of the Communist Party of India (Maoists) were found. Further, it appears that she secured employment in a different name – Shr... |
id_1052 | 12 | The prosecution has also failed to prove the electronic evidence in terms of the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act and the Information Technology Act., In view of the above conclusion, the common judgment rendered by the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 13/2014 and 130/2015 is not sustainable in the eyes of law.... |
id_1053 | 0 | W.P. No. 37781 of 2015 and M.P. No. 1 of 2015. D. Lokeswari, Petitioner. Respondents: 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Secretary to Government, Department of Education, Fort St. George, Chennai 600009. 2. The District Educational Officer, Vellore District, Vellore. 3. The Head Master, Government High Scho... |
id_1054 | 0 | Justice Uday Umesh Lalit. These appeals by Special Leave challenge the common judgment and order dated 12 October 2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench in Criminal Appeal No. 321 of 2015 and Criminal Confirmation Case No. 1 of 2015, affirming the judgment and order dated 14 August 2015 pas... |
id_1054 | 1 | We are absolutely conscious that mitigating circumstances are to be taken into consideration. The learned counsel for the appellant pointing out the mitigating circumstances would submit that the appellant is in his mid‑fifties and there is possibility of his reformation. Be it noted, the appellant was aged about forty... |
id_1054 | 2 | We shall first consider the evidence on record to see whether the guilt of the appellant is conclusively established on the strength of the material on record and whether the circumstances on record form a clear and consistent chain to rule out every other hypothesis except the guilt of the appellant. The law on the po... |
id_1054 | 3 | Once it is shown that the spurious liquor was sold from the local vends belonging to the respondents, coupled with the fact that after this tragedy struck the respondents even tried to destroy the remaining bottles, it clearly establishes that the respondents had full knowledge that the bottles contained the substance ... |
id_1054 | 4 | In Santa Singh v. State of Punjab this Supreme Court of India, considering Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, held that the hearing contemplated by that subsection is not confined merely to hearing oral submissions but extends to giving an opportunity to the prosecution and the accused to place before th... |
id_1054 | 5 | Supreme Court of India observed that though there was nothing to show that the appellant could not be reformed and rehabilitated and the manner and method of disposal of the dead body of the deceased reflected most foul and despicable case of murder, mere mode of disposal of the dead body may not by itself be made the ... |
id_1054 | 6 | At the same time, we conclude that a sentence of life imprisonment simpliciter would be inadequate in the instant case, given the gruesome nature of the offence, and the menace posed to society at large by the petitioner, as evinced by the conduct of the petitioner in jail. As per the report submitted in pursuance of t... |
id_1054 | 7 | Justice Scalia (joined by Justice Thomas) also rendered a concurring opinion. Another concurring opinion was rendered by Justice White, while Justice Blackmun (joined by Justice Stevens and Justice Souter) dissented., Oregon vs. Guzek99 The syllabus prepared by the Reporter of Decisions stated the facts as follows: At ... |
id_1060 | 0 | Through: Shri Satvir Singh (Party-in-person) versus Through: Mister Sidhant Kumar, Advocate for Election Commission of India; Mister Chetan Sharma, Additional Solicitor General of India with Mister Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for Union of India., In the backdrop of ongoing polling for the presidential election, the instan... |
id_1061 | 0 | FULL TEXT OF THE CONVOCATION ADDRESS DELIVERED BY HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA SHRI JUSTICE N V RAMANA AT THE 82ND CONVOCATION OF OSMANIA UNIVERSITY TAGORE AUDITORIUM, OSMANIA UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, HYDERABAD 05 AUGUST 2022\n\nMy heartiest congratulations to all those who received their degrees and honours today, ... |
id_1062 | 0 | Petitioners Through: Mr. D. K. Srivastava, Advocate with petitioners. Versus Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhyay, Assistant Sub-Inspector for the State with Sub-Inspector Shantanu, Police Station Amar Colony, Mr. Amit Sahni, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the state, Mr. Anil Basoya, Advocate for Respondent 2. Petitioner... |
id_1063 | 0 | Vinod Dhatterwal and others Vs. Union of India and others Present : Mr. Aashish Chopra, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate, Mr. Varun Aryan Sharma, Advocate, and Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP-PIL-9-2023. Mr. R.S. Khosla, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Yogender Verma, Advocate, and M... |
id_1067 | 0 | Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 2835/2023 (Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 2835/2023) Leave granted. The appellant was implicated along with his son and two others in a criminal complaint for an alleged offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. All the four accused were taken int... |
id_1068 | 0 | The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the name of Shri Rohit Kapoor, Advocate, for appointment as Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana., The recommendation for appointment of the above candidate as Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana was made by the Collegium of the High Court on 21 April 2023.... |
id_1069 | 0 | Date of Decision: 31st December 2021. The petitioner, through Ms. Sneha Mukherjee and Ms. Surabhi Shukla, Advocates, filed a writ petition against the respondents represented by Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Additional Standing Counsel with Mr. Siddarth Aggarwal, Advocate for Respondents 1 and 2, and Mr. Tanveer Oberoi, Advoca... |
id_1069 | 1 | If the expression \life\ in section 5(1) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act is not to be confined to mere physical existence or survival, then permission will have to be granted under section 5(1) of the Act for medical termination of pregnancy which may have exceeded 20 weeks if the continuance of such pregna... |
id_107 | 0 | W.P. (Criminal) No. 139 of 2021 Devanand Oraon, aged about 48 years, Son of Dahru Oraon, Resident of Village Dandai Hehal, Ratu, Post Office and Police Station Ratu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand, Petitioner versus the State of Jharkhand; the Home Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Post Office and Polic... |
id_107 | 1 | The investigation of offences is one of the important duties the police has to perform. The aim of investigation is ultimately to search for truth and bring the offender to book. A proper investigation into crime is one of the essentials of the criminal justice system and an integral facet of rule of law. The investiga... |
id_107 | 2 | While directing an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation, the Jharkhand High Court, as stated in the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the case of Common Cause, must record a prima facie finding as to the truth of such allegations with reference to the reply filed. In the instant case, we have noticed ... |
id_107 | 3 | There is no doubt that voluminous case diary has been produced in the High Court of Jharkhand. However, this is only because of contents of Call Detail Record between Late Rupa Tirkey and Shiv Kumar Kanogiya and the father of Late Rupa Tirkey, except certain evidence recorded of other persons. On watching the videograp... |
id_107 | 4 | Nobody can be permitted to tarnish the image of the temple of justice. In the case in hand, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned Advocate General and Mr. Sachin Kumar, learned Additional Advocate General-II, who are senior law officers of the State undermined and tarnished the image of the Jharkhand High Court. An Advocate has no... |
id_1070 | 0 | (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 2493 of 2021) (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos. 6797-6798 of 2021) Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions., For the nature of order that we propose to pass, it is not necessary to dilate on the factual matrix of the case. Suffice it t... |
id_1071 | 0 | These appeals have been filed against the judgments and orders dated 20th August 2008 passed by the Delhi High Court at New Delhi in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1549 of 1997 and the order dated 29th September 2008 passed in Review Petition No. 341 of 2008 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1549 of 2008 by the Delhi High Court.... |
id_1072 | 0 | Honorable Judge Sharad Kumar Sharma. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate, for the applicant. Ms. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Paritosh Dalakoti, Advocate, for the respondent. The present applicant is an accused alleged to be involved in the commission of offences under Section 354A of the Indian Penal Co... |
id_1073 | 0 | Charan Singh (also known as Charanjit Singh) is the appellant, husband of the deceased Chhilo Kaur, and appeals against the State of Uttarakhand. He challenges his conviction and sentence under sections 304B, 498A and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Trial Court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for ten yea... |
id_1076 | 0 | Record of Cases No. 394/SO/2020 Date: 04-01-2022 Notification Subject: COVID-19 – Hearing of the cases in the Telangana High Court – Modified instructions – Issued. Reference: Telangana High Court Notification in Record of Cases No. 394/50/2020, dated 05-11-2021., Considering the spike in COVID-19 cases and other varia... |
id_1077 | 0 | Reserved on: 2nd June 2022 Pronounced on: 4th July 2022 Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Ms. Rachana Dalal and Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and Mr. Sushil Dixit, Advocate for Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board, Ms. Geetanjali Mohan, Advocate for ..., The homeless, who occupy the pavements,... |
id_1077 | 1 | Miss Mohan, appearing for the Railways, submitted that fixing of cut‑off dates for application of beneficial policies is permissible in administrative law and has been upheld in several decisions. To my mind, this argument really begs the issue at hand. The fixing of 30th November 1998 as a cut‑off date for the purpose... |
id_1079 | 0 | Applicant: Phoolchandra Yadav and two others. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Applicant: Shivam Yadav and Akhilesh Singh. Counsel for Opposite Party: G. A. Honourable Suneet Kumar, J. learned counsel for the applicants and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State through video ... |
id_108 | 0 | This application is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to invoke the inherent powers of this Court to quash the FIR dated 18 December 2020 and the resultant criminal proceedings in Special Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Case No. 10 of 2021 under Section 5(1)/6 of the Pro... |
id_1081 | 0 | Applicant: Mohd. Abdul Khaliq. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh and Another. Counsel for Applicant: Akhtar Jahan, Bahar Ali. Counsel for Opposite Party: G.A. Honourable Shamim Ahmed, J. Heard Shri Bahar Ali, Shri Prem Prakash, Mrs. Kiran Singh and Shri Hari Shankar Vajpayee, the learned Additional Government Advo... |
id_1082 | 0 | Date of decision: 27 September 2021. Through: Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate, versus Through: Mr. S. V. Raju, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Amit Prasad, Special Public Prosecutor for the State along with Mr. Anshuman Raghuvanshi and Mr. Ayodhya Prasad, Advocates and Deputy Commissioner of Police Rajesh Deo, Legal and... |
id_1082 | 1 | The clinching evidence that tilts the Supreme Court of India towards prolonging the incarceration of the Petitioner is that the weapon which is being carried by the Petitioner is capable of causing grievous injuries and/or death, and is prima facie a dangerous weapon. The argument of the Counsel for the Petitioner that... |
id_1083 | 0 | The petitioners are the accused in Crime No. 160/2018 of Kalady Police Station. The petitioner in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2814/2022 is the first accused and the petitioner in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2807/2022 is the second accused in the said crime. The crime was registered alleging offences punishable ... |
id_1084 | 0 | On 6 May 2021, a hearing was held before the Supreme Court of India (Video Conferencing, Section XIV) arising out of the impugned final judgment and order dated 1 May 2021 in WP(C) No. 3031/2020 and 4 May 2021 in WP(C) No. 3031/2020 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. The petitioners were represented by Ms ... |
id_1084 | 1 | The terms of reference of the National Task Force shall be to: Assess and make recommendations for the entire country based on the need for, availability and distribution of medical oxygen; Formulate and devise the methodology for the allocation of medical oxygen to the States and Union Territories on a scientific, rat... |
id_1086 | 0 | Reserved on: 26.07.2023 Pronounced on: 25.10.2023 These contempt petitions (criminal) having been heard and reserved for orders, coming on for pronouncement this day, Hon'ble Justice Vishal Mishra passed the following:, These suo motu contempt proceedings have been initiated against respondent Manoj Kumar Shrivastava, ... |
id_1087 | 0 | Crime No. 596/2022 of Valappad Police Station, Thrissur, dated 9 December 2022. This is an appeal filed under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafter referred to as the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for convenience) by t... |
id_1091 | 0 | Reserved on 02.07.2021 Delivered on 07.07.2021. Petitioner: Mohd. Umar Gautam. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary Home, Lucknow and others. Counsel for Petitioner: Vijay Vikram Singh, Ashma Izzat, Kumail Haider. Counsel for Respondent: Government Advocate Honourable Ramesh Sinha, Honourable ... |
id_1092 | 0 | This appeal is at the instance of a convict accused and is directed against the judgment and order dated 03.09.2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, in Criminal Appeal No. 762-SB of 1998, by which the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein and thereby affirmed the jud... |
id_1095 | 0 | Non Reportable (arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil Revision) No(s) 1406 of 2017) Leave granted. The complainant Amita Tudu (Petitioner Witness 7), as per the written report at the relevant time, was the President of Village Education Committee, Middle School, Kora Para. Budget meeting for the training for 200... |
id_1096 | 0 | Appellant: State of Uttar Pradesh. Respondent: Sarvan. Counsel for Appellant: Government Advocate. Counsel for Respondent: Manjusha Kapil. Connected with Appellant: Smt. Suman. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Appellant: Kamlesh Singh. Counsel for Respondent: Government Advocate. Honorable Justice Ramesh... |
id_1096 | 1 | The case was committed to the Sessions Court in the usual manner where the convicts/appellants were charged for offences punishable under Sections 302, 323 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. They pleaded not guilty to the charges and claimed to be tried. Their defence was of denial. During the trial, the prosecution, in... |
id_1096 | 2 | He reached the house of the gardener and talked to him for about one minute. He further deposed that the incident occurred earlier and thereafter he met the gardener. Even after seeing the incident, he went to the house of the gardener. After that he went to the house through another pathway due to fear. He further dep... |
id_1096 | 3 | Defence Witness 2 had also stated that the police was informed by the watchman and villagers about the incident through phone, whereas it transpires from the statement of Defence Witness 1, Pawan Kumar, who is the real brother of the convict/appellant Sarvan, that on his telephonic call the police reached the place of ... |
id_1096 | 4 | Haresh Mohandas Rajput v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 12 Supreme Court Cases 56, after referring to Bachan Singh (supra) and Machhi Singh (supra), the Supreme Court of India expanded the “rarest of rare” formulation beyond the aggravating factors listed in Bachan Singh (supra) to cases where the “collective conscience”... |
id_1097 | 0 | The practice of having a distinguished class of senior pleaders with considerable status and experience in India can be traced back to legal practice in the United Kingdom. This category originated in the 13th century as a distinguished class of senior pleaders known as Serjeants-at-Law. In the 18th century, selection ... |
id_1099 | 0 | Reserved on 01.05.2023 Delivered on 03.08.2023 Case: Writ - Civil No. 2637 of 2023 Petitioner: Tehsil Bar Association, Sadar Tehsil Parisar, Gandhi Nagar, Ghaziabad Respondent: Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited and three others Counsel for Petitioner: Vivek Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent: Pranjal Mehrotra,... |
id_1099 | 1 | Therefore, the legal profession by no stretch of imagination can be called a commercial activity, trade or business. Having held that the legal profession is not a commercial activity involving any trade or business, the rates schedule LMV-2, which is phrased as ‘non‑domestic users under LMV‑2’, categorically indicates... |
id_11 | 0 | Writ Petition (Public Interest Litigation) No. 1227 of 2024 Supreme Court of India on its own motion Petitioner versus the State of Jharkhand and Others. Respondents. For the State: Mr Ashutosh Anand, Additional Advocate General – III. Order No. 01 dated 4 March 2024., The incident of sexual assault on a 45‑year‑old Br... |
id_1101 | 0 | Subject: Dispute Case No. 01 of 2022 – Dispute in Shiv Sena – dispute under Paragraph 15 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968.\n\nThe Election Commission of India issued an Interim Order dated 8 October 2022 and forwarded a certified copy of the Commission's Interim Order dated 8 October 2022... |
id_1102 | 0 | Presented on 17-01-2022, registered on 17-01-2022 and decided on 27-01-2022. Duration ten days. Gajanan Chandrakant Khergamkar, aged about 53 years, residing at Sukhniwas, 9-A Block, 3rd floor, 3rd Pasta Lane, Colaba, Mumbai-400005, is the applicant/accused. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Colaba Police St... |
id_1104 | 0 | The petitioner, who is the mother of a 14‑year‑old girl, has approached the High Court of Kerala seeking medical termination of pregnancy of her daughter on the ground that she was raped by the accused, who is now in custody under the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act); ... |
id_1106 | 0 | Considering the constant decline in COVID-19 positive cases and after exhaustive discussion with medical experts, it is notified that while continuing with all preventive measures for effective control and containment of spread of COVID-19, in supersession of all previous directions, regular hearing of cases in Rajasth... |
id_1107 | 0 | I.A. No. 170-2023 (Tasleem Ahmed) Police Station Crime Branch, Delhi (Investigated by Special Cell) under sections 13, 16, 17, 18 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 120B read with sections 109, 114, 1247, 435, 436, 452, 454, 468, 471, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damag... |
id_1108 | 0 | Criminal Appeal No(s). 793-794 of 2022 Rajesh & Anr. Appellants Versus the State of Madhya Pradesh Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 795 of 2022 Sanjay Kumar, J., Ajit Pal alias Bobby, a 15‑year‑old lad, was killed brutally in the last week of July 2013. A neighbour, Om Prakash Yadav, along with his brother, Raja Yadav, a... |
id_1108 | 1 | In other words, the exact information given by the accused while in custody, which led to recovery of the articles can be proved. It was noted that this doctrine is founded on the principle that if any fact is discovered as a search was made on the strength of any information obtained from a prisoner, such a discovery ... |
id_1109 | 0 | Appellant: Manvir. Respondent: State. Counsel for Appellant: From Jail. Counsel for Respondent: Additional Government Advocate. Honourable Suneet Kumar, Judge. Honourable Vikram D. Chauhan, Judge (Per: Honourable Vikram D. Chauhan, Judge). Heard Ms. Abida Syed, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant and learned Additi... |
id_1109 | 1 | It is to be noted that the officer concerned was not having the knowledge of the facts stated in the First Information Report and as such, he could not have in any manner changed the circumstances stated in the First Information Report. Insofar as the time when the First Information Report was lodged is concerned, as p... |
id_111 | 0 | Case: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7796 of 2023. Petitioner: Neha Singh. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. Counsel for Petitioner: Ram Janam Shahi, Pramod Kumar Yadav. Counsel for Respondent: Chief Standing Counsel Honourable Ajit Kumar, Judge., Heard Sri Atul Kumar, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri ... |
id_1110 | 0 | Date of Institution: 08.03.2022 Date of Order: 20.04.2022 In the case of (Name withheld) through his father, Applicant/Child in Conflict with Law (CICL), represented by Advocate Mr. Mir Tashveeq & Associates, Police Station Nowhatta, Srinagar (Non‑Applicants). Through Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Zaffar Iqbal Shahe... |
id_1111 | 0 | The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the name of Shri Justice Rahul Bharti, Additional Judge, for appointment as permanent Judge of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh in the following terms: On 21 August 2023, the Collegium of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh unanimously recommended the nam... |
id_1114 | 0 | Khadi & Village Industries Commission, Applicant / Plaintiff, Board of Trustees, Mumbai; Khadi and Village Industries Association, Respondent / Defendant; Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate as well as Ms. Shwetasree Majumdar, Ms. Shreya Ganguly and Mr. Jay Sanklecha in behalf of Bimal Rajasekhar for Applicant / Plaint... |
id_1116 | 0 | High Court of Himachal Pradesh Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 1425 of 2023 Reserved on 26 June 2023 Decided on 24 July 2023 Dr. Nadeem Akhtar Applicant versus State of Himachal Pradesh Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. For the applicant: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate. For the resp... |
id_1117 | 0 | Judgment reserved on 15 November 2022 and pronounced on 9 February 2023. The petition was filed through Ms. Rebecca John, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Rony John, Mr. Shivam Batra, Mr. Akhil Ranganathan, Mr. Subir Sarkar, Mr. Ankit Bhushan, Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Aditya Luthra, Mr. Piyush Swami and Mr. Anuj Dubey, ... |
id_1117 | 1 | However, the key words in section 72 of the Information Technology Act state that the person who secures access to an electronic record, book, register, correspondence, information, document or other material has to be in pursuance of powers conferred under the Act or rules and regulations made thereunder. The contract... |
id_1118 | 0 | F. No. 53/Judl./2023 28th June, 2023 The following procedure shall be adopted and followed for mentioning of matters before the Supreme Court of India with effect from 03.07.2023: Miscellaneous Fresh matters., Miscellaneous fresh matters which are verified on Saturday, Monday and Tuesday shall be automatically listed o... |
id_1119 | 0 | This is a petition seeking the following prayers: quashing of search warrants dated 22 December 2020 issued by learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, District Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in FIR No. 212/2020, Police Station Special Cell; setting aside order dated 02 March 2021 passed by learned Chief Metropol... |
id_112 | 0 | BE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventy‑fourth Year of the Republic of India as follows: (1) This Act may be called the Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita, 2023. (2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint, and different dates may be appoint... |
id_112 | 1 | Except in the Chapters and sections mentioned in sub‑clauses (a) and (b), the word offence means a thing made punishable by this Sanhita, but (a) in Chapter III and in the following sections, namely, sub‑sections (2), (3), (4) and (5) of section 8, sections 9, 49, 50, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 119, 120, 123, ... |
id_112 | 2 | Nothing which is done in good faith for the benefit of a person under twelve years of age, or person of unsound mind, by or with consent, either express or implied, of the guardian or other person having lawful charge of that person, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to ... |
id_112 | 3 | Abetment of offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life. Abetment of offence punishable with imprisonment. A, a police officer, whose duty it is to prevent robbery, abets the commission of robbery. Here, though the robbery is not committed, A is liable to one-half of the longest term of imprisonment provided... |
id_112 | 4 | Whoever kidnaps or abducts any woman with intent that she may be compelled, or knowing it to be likely that she will be compelled, to marry any person against her will, or in order that she may be forced or seduced to illicit intercourse, or knowing it to be likely that she will be forced or seduced to illicit intercou... |
id_112 | 5 | Whoever does any act with the intent to threaten or likely to threaten the unity, integrity, sovereignty, security, or economic security of India or with the intent to strike terror or likely to strike terror in the people or any section of the people in India or in any foreign country, (a) by using bombs, dynamite or ... |
id_112 | 6 | Kidnapping is of two kinds: kidnapping from India, and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of India without the consent of that person, or of a person legally authorised to consent on behalf of that person, is said to kidnap that person from India. Whoever takes or entices ... |
id_112 | 7 | Whoever, fraudulently or with intent to cause loss to the Government, uses for any purpose a stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, which he knows to have been before used, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both., Wh... |
id_112 | 8 | Whoever refuses to bind himself by an oath or affirmation to state the truth, when required so to bind himself by a public servant legally competent to require that he shall so bind himself, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thous... |
id_112 | 9 | Whoever accepts or attempts to obtain, or agrees to accept, any gratification for himself or any other person, or any restitution of property to himself or any other person, in consideration of his concealing an offence or of his screening any person from legal punishment for any offence, or of his not proceeding again... |
id_112 | 10 | Whoever (a) sells, lets to hire, distributes, publicly exhibits or in any manner puts into circulation, or for purposes of sale, hire, distribution, public exhibition or circulation, makes, produces or has in his possession any obscene book, pamphlet, paper, drawing, painting, representation or figure or any other obsc... |
id_112 | 11 | His servant A, before the money comes into the possession of any person entitled to such possession, dishonestly misappropriates it. A has committed the offence defined in this section. Of criminal breach of trust 316. (1) Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishone... |
id_112 | 12 | Whoever, being entrusted with any closed receptacle which contains or which he believes to contain property, without having authority to open the same, dishonestly, or with intent to commit mischief, breaks open or unfastens that receptacle, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.