ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_1555 | 0 | Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) versus Through: Mr. Vishnu Vaysanal, Mr. Samrendra Kumar, Advocate for Respondent 1. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocate for Respondent 2. The hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing)., An affidavit has been ... |
id_1556 | 0 | Aboil alias Yugandhara, wife of Tejpal Patil, age 28 years, occupation Household, resident at care of Ravindra Eknath Patil, Plot-12, Gat 61, 3/2, Kolhe Nagar (West), Jalgaon, Taluka and District Jalgaon, is the petitioner. The respondent is Tejpal, son of Premchand Patil, age 36 years, occupation Service, resident of ... |
id_1558 | 0 | Through: Ms. Samridhi Arora, Advocate, along with Ms. Sanjana, Advocate, versus Ms. Avni Singh, Advocate, Sub-Inspector Rajat Malik, Police Station Dwarka North., The present application has been filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking necessary directions from the Delhi High Court to preve... |
id_1559 | 0 | High Court of Himachal Pradesh Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Nos. 79 and 84 of 2024 Criminal Writ Petition No. 14 of 2023 Reserved on: 05.01.2024 Pronounced on: 09.01.2023 Versus Respondents Coram: Honorable Mr. Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice. Honorable Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether appr... |
id_1559 | 1 | Superintendent of Police (Law and Order), Kangra, who was the Investigation Officer at Kangra, summoned the wife of Nishant Sharma to make a statement, but there was no woman constable in the room and only four male constables were present when her statement was recorded. The copy of FIR No. 55 of 2023, which was filed... |
id_156 | 0 | Press Release dated 10 June 2021. The Bar Council of India has received and continues to receive thousands of letters and requests from students of various universities and law colleges across the country. Some heads of institutions have sought guidance from the Council on examinations and promotions of LL.B. students.... |
id_1561 | 0 | CS (Comm) 679/2023 Page 1 of 36 Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sarad Kumar Sunny, Mr. Rohan Dua, Mr. Keshav Mann and Ms. Yashi Dubey, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri and Mr. Harshit Kiran, Advocates for Defendant 1; Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Mr. Kishore Kunal, Mr. Abhishek Avadhani and ... |
id_1561 | 1 | The name or the mark will have acquired a secondary meaning (see Chivers v. Chivers 28). It follows that someone may, even by using his own name innocently, make a representation that is untrue, that is, a representation that goods which in fact are his are the goods of someone else (see Reddaway). In Joseph Rodgers & ... |
id_1561 | 2 | In an action for infringement, the plaintiff must, no doubt, make out that the use of the defendant's mark is likely to deceive, but where the similarity between the plaintiff's and the defendant's mark is so close either visually, phonetically or otherwise and the court reaches the conclusion that there is an imitatio... |
id_1562 | 0 | Civil Revision Petition Nos. 3586 and 4156 of 2022 are filed by petitioner Kiran Kumar Chava alias Kiran Chava against respondent Usha Kiran Anne. The petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to strike off Original Petition No. 2788 of 2022 pending before the Second Additional Family C... |
id_1562 | 1 | Section 27 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 provides jurisdiction as follows: (1) The court of Judicial Magistrate of the first class or the Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be, within the local limits of which (a) the aggrieved person permanently or temporarily resides, carries on bu... |
id_1562 | 2 | As far as the ex parte orders of United States Courts are concerned, though the foreign judgments are not conclusive and it is only a factor to be decided, the facts and circumstances would reveal that the respondent as well as the twin children have taken a decision to reside at Chennai Civil Revision Petition Numbers... |
id_1564 | 0 | Shaikh Sana Farheen Shahmir, Age 24 years, Occupation: Student; Shahmir Shamshoddin Shaikh, Age 46 years, Occupation: Service; Shaikh Khaja Begum Shaikh Shahmir, Age 40 years, Occupation: Household; Shaikh Saziya Sadaf Shaikh Shahmir, Age 19 years, Occupation: Student; all residing at Aziz Colony, Naregaon, Aurangabad,... |
id_1567 | 0 | Special Court for the Trial of Criminal Cases against Sitting and Former Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assembly (State) Present: Shrimati Naina K.V., Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Wednesday, 2nd day of August, 2023 (11th Sravana 1945) Criminal Case No. 18/2021 Complainant: State represented by... |
id_1568 | 0 | Ms. Kangana Ranaut, Petitioner, versus The State of Maharashtra and Mr. Javed Akhtar, Respondents. Mr. Rizwan Siddiquee with Mr. Aditya Charan and Ms. Sumreen Aalana, by Siddiquee and Associates, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. Jaykumar Bharadwaj and Mr. Harsh Ramchandani, Advocates for Respondent No.2. Mr. H. S. Ven... |
id_1569 | 0 | Case Number DLNE01-000610-2021. State versus Sandeep Kumar. Session Case No. 78/2021, First Information Report No. 66/2020, Police Station Karawal Nagar. Judgment dated 31 October 2023. The matter concerns the son of Sh. Ramesh Chand, resident of House Number 230, Gali Number 11, Phase‑9, Shiv Vihar, Karawal Nagar, Del... |
id_1569 | 1 | This was a wrong practice, because the complaints other than those made by Shokeen were clubbed for investigation in this case without having a sound basis to do the same. In respect of an untrace report or closure report, every complainant has the right to make a representation before the Metropolitan Magistrate again... |
id_157 | 0 | The petitioners challenge the validity of the Karnataka Amendment Act No. 28 of 2021, which amends the Karnataka Police Act, 1963 (hereinafter the Principal Act). The amendment criminalises the playing or facilitation of online games. After service of notice, the respondents, appearing through the Advocate General, fil... |
id_157 | 1 | Learned Advocate General appearing for the respondents per contra contended that the legislative competence of the State extends to and beyond Entry 34. He points out Entry 1 (Public order), Entry 2 (Police), Entry 6 (Public health and sanitation) and Entry 26 (Trade and commerce) in the same List. According to respond... |
id_157 | 2 | Article 253 is intended to make it clear that the power to enter into treaties conferred on Parliament carries with it, as incidental thereto, a power to invade the State List to enable the Union to implement the treaty. Thus a law passed by Parliament to give effect to an international convention shall not be invalida... |
id_157 | 3 | The online gaming activities played with stake or not do not fall within the ambit of Entry 34 of the State List, that is, 'Betting and gambling', if they predominantly involve skill, judgment or knowledge. They partake the character of business activities and therefore, they have protection under Article 19(1)(g). App... |
id_157 | 4 | We reach this conclusion for the additional reasons that apart from the complaint of denial of fundamental right to carry on trade or business, numerous other contentions have been raised which the High Court of Karnataka had to examine in a petition under Article 226. There is also a grievance of denial of equality be... |
id_1572 | 0 | W.P.(C) 5099/2023 and CM APPL. 19920/2023, 19921/2023 Through: Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kaustubh Shakkarwar, Advocates (M-9764143399) versus Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Mrs. Lavanya Kaushik and Mrs. Aliza Alam, Advocates. Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Dr. Sumit Ku... |
id_1573 | 0 | IDIA students from diverse backgrounds soar to new heights in CLAT 2020 Press Release India (6 October 2020). IDIA Charitable Trust (IDIA) is ready to welcome its new batch of Scholars including Jai Singh Rathor, who has performed brilliantly and obtained All India Rank 3 in Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2020. Belon... |
id_1574 | 0 | Reserved on 30-08-2022, Pronounced on 12-10-2022. Kumar Vishwas Petitioner v. State of Punjab and another Respondents. Present: Mr. Randeep Rai, Senior Advocate and Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate; Ms. Rubina Virmani, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate wi... |
id_1575 | 0 | Petitioner versus Respondents. Mr. Zaid Anwar Qureshi in behalf of Hulyalkar & Associates for the Petitioner. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent State. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to amend to mask the name of the prosecutrix wherever it appears in the pet... |
id_1576 | 0 | Criminal Revision No. 04/2022 Case No. 32/2022 Unique Case ID No. DLND01-000849-2022 Rishabh Jain Revisionist Versus State (NCT of Delhi) Respondent FIR No. 35/2015 under Section 509/34 of the Indian Penal Code Petition received on assignment: 02.02.2022 Arguments on petition concluded: 03.02.2022 Date fixed for pronou... |
id_1577 | 0 | Date of decision: 16 November 2023. Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Sharian Mukherji, Ms. Rekha Punya Angara and Mr. Mueed Shah, Advocates. Mr. Vineet Dhanda, Advocate versus through: Mr. Prashant Mehta, Advocate for Respondent 1 and Mr. Raghav Marwah, Advocate for Respondents 2 and ... |
id_1578 | 0 | Chanda Kochhar, an Indian inhabitant, residing at 45 CCI Chambers, Dinshaw Vachha Road, Churchgate, Mumbai 400020, is the appellant. ICICI Bank Limited, a company having its office at ICICI Bank Towers, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400051, is the respondent. Senior advocates for the appellant are Mr. Asp... |
id_1578 | 1 | Khambata submitted: the reliefs sought by appellant are in the nature of final reliefs and any grant of such reliefs would amount to decreeing appellant's suit at the interim stage; in any event, the Employee Stock Option Plans claimed by appellant have already been cancelled in 2019 and subsequently added to the commo... |
id_1579 | 0 | Criminal Revision No.172 of 2022 Rudra Narayan Ray, son of late Dr. Prasanta Ray, resident of First Fidar Road, Bankura, P.O., P.S. and District Bankura, West Bengal versus Piyali Ray Chatterjee, wife of Sri Rudra Narayan Ray, daughter of Vishwaranjan Chatterjee, resident of Maluti, P.O. Maluti, P.S. Shikaripara, Distr... |
id_1579 | 1 | The intent of Rudra Narayan Ray is also apparent that he has filed the suit for judicial separation, not for divorce, because he wanted to keep his wife with him but she was adamant to live separately without any reasonable cause in her parental house., From perusal of the petition under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriag... |
id_158 | 0 | Decided on 31st January 2024. Through: Mr Keshav Thakur, Mr Mahesh Prasad, Ms Malak Mathur, Mr Prithvi Thakur and Mr Ritik Kumar, Advocates, for the petitioner. Through: Mr R K Aggarwal, Ms Ayushi Bansal and Mr Vinay Padam, Advocates, for the respondent. Interim Application 14398/2023 (for exemption) – exemption allowe... |
id_1580 | 0 | Chief Justice's Court Petitioner: Anjuman Intazamia Masazid Varanasi Respondent: Ist ADJ Varanasi and Others Counsel for Petitioner: S.F.A. Naqvi, learned Senior Advocate, Puneet Kumar Gupta, Syed Ahmed Faizan. Counsel for Respondent: Ajay Kumar Singh, Vijai Shankar Rastogi, M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Additional Advocate... |
id_1581 | 0 | Judgment reserved on 04.09.2023; judgment delivered on 16.10.2023. Through Mr. S. K. Rungta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocate, versus through Mr. S. Rajappa and Mr. R. Gourishankar, Advocates for Respondent 1. Respondent 2 is the National Council for Teacher Education. Respondent 3 is the Central Gover... |
id_1581 | 1 | The aforesaid clause offers a crucial guiding mechanism for the computation of reservation, as contemplated by the statute. On a literal and grammatical reading of Clause 6, it becomes clear that the reservation is to be computed on the total number of vacancies in the cadre strength of a group. Such total number of va... |
id_1582 | 0 | Through: Mister Sunil Mehta and Mister Ishan Roy Choudhary, Advocates, versus Mister Sanjeev Mahajan, Advocate., The present matter is at the stage of final arguments. At joint consent of the counsels for the parties, the matter was listed on 16 April 2024., After the date was given and item number 11 was taken, the pl... |
id_1583 | 0 | Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: The Honorable Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya, Writ Petition No. 22748 of 2022, Mannoj Kumar Jain & Anr. versus Union of India & Others. For the petitioners: Sudip Deb, Advocate; Riju Ghosh, Advocate; Sumitava Chakraborty, Advocate; Aranyak Saha, Advocate; Ita Ghos... |
id_1584 | 0 | FIR No. 218/2021 PS Model Town under Sections 302, 308, 365, 325, 323, 341, 506, 188, 269, 34, 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25, 54, 59 of the Arms Act. State versus Sushil Kumar, dated 09‑06‑2021. In the scenario of the COVID‑19 pandemic, the matter was taken up through video‑conferencing hearing in comp... |
id_1585 | 0 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19702 of 2021 Akanksha Maviya Petitioner(s) versus the Union of India and Others Respondent(s)., Appearance for the Petitioners: Mr. Vishal Kumar Singh, Advocate; Mr. Akash Keshav, Advocate; Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate; Mr. Shashwat, Advocate. Appearance for the Respondents: Mr. Dr... |
id_1586 | 0 | Arising Out of Police Station Case No. 163 Year 2020 Thana Warisaliganj District Nawada. Shiv Kumar son of Late Sanjay Pandit, resident of Village Baghi Chakwae, Police Station Warisaliganj, District Nawada, petitioner versus the State of Bihar, Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), LIC Building, Connaught Place, New Delh... |
id_1589 | 0 | A petition under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 is filed in the matter of Chevrox Construction Private Limited (Operational Creditor) versus Bridge and Roof Co. (India) Limited (Corporate Debtor)... |
id_1589 | 1 | The fee payable to the Interim Resolution Professional or the Resolution Professional, as the case may be, shall be compliant with such Regulations, Circulars and Directions as may be issued by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI). The Interim Resolution Professional shall carry out his functions as cont... |
id_159 | 0 | Reportable Writ Petition (C) No. 116 of 2019\nForum for People's Collective Efforts (FPCE) and another (Petitioners) versus State of West Bengal and another (Respondents)\nDr. Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud (Chairman) – The challenge – Legislative history – Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) – the l... |
id_159 | 1 | Definition of common areas means (i) the entire land for the real estate project or, where the project is developed in phases and registration under this Act is sought for a phase, the entire land for that phase; (ii) the staircases, lifts, staircase and lift lobbies, fire escapes, and common entrances and exits of bui... |
id_159 | 2 | The promoter shall prepare and maintain all such other details as may be specified, from time to time, by regulations made by the Authority., Where any person makes an advance or a deposit on the basis of the information contained in the notice, advertisement or prospectus, or on the basis of any model apartment, plot ... |
id_159 | 3 | The functions of the Authority shall include: to register and regulate real estate projects and real estate agents registered under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016; to publish and maintain a website of records, for public viewing, of all real estate projects for which registration has been given,... |
id_159 | 4 | Penalty for failure to comply with orders of Appellate Tribunal by real estate agent. Penalty for failure to comply with orders of Authority by allottee. If any allottee who fails to comply with or contravenes any of the orders, decisions or directions of the Authority, he shall be liable to a penalty for the period du... |
id_159 | 5 | By Section 92 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, Parliament repealed the Maharashtra legislation while Kerala repealed its own law in 2017. The legislative history of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act would indicate that there was a clarion call for a uniform national law in the real‑es... |
id_159 | 6 | The vires of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act 1951 were challenged on the ground that the Act related to the subject of industries, the control of which by the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest within the meaning of Entry 52 of List I. Parliament enacted the Ac... |
id_159 | 7 | Justice K. Subba Rao noted that the unamended Motor Vehicles Act 1939 did not make any provision for the nationalisation of transport services but the States introduced amendments to implement the scheme of nationalisation of road transport. With a view to introduce a Union law throughout the country, Parliament enacte... |
id_159 | 8 | In the case of Union Territories, the definition of the expression 'appropriate government' in Section 2(g) is bifurcated into three categories: a Union Territory without a legislature; the Union Territory of Puducherry; and the Union Territory of Delhi., Parliament, while enacting the Real Estate (Regulation and Devel... |
id_159 | 9 | In this backdrop, the Supreme Court of India observed: From the introduction of the Explanation to Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, it is clear that Parliament was aware of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), and applied some of its definition provisions so that they cou... |
id_159 | 10 | |
id_1591 | 0 | Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: Honourable Justice Amrita Sinha, Srimanta Malik & Ors., The State of West Bengal for the writ petitioner Kallol Basu, Mr Suman Banerjee for the respondents numbered 6 to 9 Samrat Choudhury, Abhijeet Bhattacharyya for the State, Lalit Mohan Mahata, Ziaul Haque. He... |
id_1592 | 0 | Reportable Miscellaneous Application No 1925 of 2020, Civil Appeal No 10930 of 2018, Citizens for Green Doon & Ors. (Appellants) versus Union of India & Ors. (Respondents). Miscellaneous Application No 2180 of 2020, Civil Appeal No 10930 of 2018. Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud. This judgment has been divided into sec... |
id_1592 | 1 | It is important for us to take note of the relevant judicial pronouncements on the subject, as well as understand the requirements of the circulars and guidelines which have been issued in regard to these issues. However, given the specific setting of the Project in the heart of the Himalayas, our framework has to take... |
id_1592 | 2 | [2012 MoRTH Circular] that width of carriageway shall be at least two lane with paved shoulders irrespective of the traffic thereon in new projects undertaken for widening of carriageway/bypasses/realignments., However, challenges have come to the fore in adhering to these standards in the context of National Highways ... |
id_1592 | 3 | It provided that such roads should be constructed with not less than a two lane carriageway with a paved shoulder on the hill side and an earthen shoulder on the valley side. The relevant clause is reproduced below: Width of carriageway, shoulders and roadway for various categories of roads are given in Table 6.2. Note... |
id_1592 | 4 | However, that does not mean that the environmental effect on these roads and their surroundings will be any less important and does not need to be remedied. The State has tried to justify the efficacy of its current measures solely by noting their benefits directly to the Armed Forces. Indeed, while that is a crucial f... |
id_1593 | 0 | Kangana Ranaut, Applicant, versus the State of Maharashtra and another Respondent. Mr. Rizwan Siddiquee, of Siddiquee and Associates, for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Patil, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1 (State). Mr. Jaykumar Bharadwaj, with Ms. Priya Darshini Arora and Ms. Sabiha S. Shaikh, for Responde... |
id_1595 | 0 | W.P.(C) No.21560 of 2021 Dated this the 21st day of December, 2021. This writ petition is filed with a prayer to declare that affixing the photograph of the Hon'ble Prime Minister of India in the COVID-19 Vaccination Certificate of the petitioner is an infringement of his fundamental right. There is a further prayer to... |
id_1595 | 1 | As Bapuji said, the winner should know that he won the race because there is a loser. The loser should know that he is the loser and he is not the winner. There ends the dispute. Mutual respect is part of democracy. If that is not there, that will be the black day of democracy., Writ Petition (Civil) No. 21560 of 2021.... |
id_1598 | 0 | Appellant: Uday Prakash; Respondent: Anand Pandit and Another. Counsel for Appellant: Shantanu. Counsel for Respondent: Ankur Tandon, Anubhav Shukla, Rahul Agarwal, Rahul Rathi, Ram Shiromani Shukla., This is a plaintiff's appeal from an order of Mr. Jitendra Kumar Sinha, the learned District Judge, Ghaziabad, rejectin... |
id_1598 | 1 | A mere discussion of a work involving intellectual intricacies with another is not a case enough to impute that other with knowledge of its contents; and knowledge good enough to share it with a third party. The pleadings, therefore, are woefully vague about the access of the defendants to the copyrighted work., The ne... |
id_1598 | 2 | The issue before the Supreme Court of Canada relating to violation of copyright arose in the context of provision of custom photocopying services by the Law Society of Upper Canada, a statutory non‑profit corporation of some standing. The law society maintained and operated a library equipped with reference and researc... |
id_1599 | 0 | D.B. Criminal Death Reference No. 1/2019 State, through Public Prosecutor, Petitioner versus Atmaram, son of Norang Ram, belonging to Lakhara caste, resident of Anoopshahar, Police Station Bhadra, District Hanumangarh; Omprakash, Anoopshahar, Hanumangarh; Liladhar, Anoopshahar, Hanumangarh; Sharwan, Anoopshahar, Hanuma... |
id_1599 | 1 | Lacerated wound measuring 3 cm by 1.5 cm extending to bone was found in the left occipital area of the head, associated with an underlying fracture of the left occipital bone. Abrasion measuring 3 cm by 1 cm was seen at the root of the nose. Lacerated wound measuring 3 cm by 1 cm by 0.5 cm was present on the dorsal asp... |
id_1599 | 2 | The facts of the case at hand are identical with illustration (a) of Section 6 of the Evidence Act, which reads as follows: 6. Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction.- Facts which, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction, are relevant, whether they... |
id_1599 | 3 | In the past four decades or so, the Supreme Court of India has been consistently echoing its concern on the constitutional ethos on value and dignity of life, when it said in Bachan Singh (supra) that extreme depravity (paragraph 201), it is the duty of the State to adduce evidence that there is no probability that the... |
id_16 | 0 | This file relates to reconsideration of the proposal for appointment of Shri Saurabh Kirpal, Advocate as Judge of the Delhi High Court. The recommendation unanimously made by the Collegium of the Delhi High Court on 13 October 2017 and approved by the Supreme Court Collegium on 11 November 2021 has been referred back t... |
id_160 | 0 | Anjali Guru Sanjana Jaan, Age: 42 years, Occupation: Household, Resident of Bhadli Bk., Taluka and District Jalgaon. The State of Maharashtra, through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. The State Election Commission, Amarprem Building, Near Gokhale College, Shimpoli Road, Mumbai.... |
id_1600 | 0 | Bail Application No. 93/2022/C Sonia Doohan, Daughter of late Shri Sanshar Singh, aged 30 years, resident of VPO Petwar, District Hisar, Tehsil Narnanund 122053 Haryana, India. Applicant versus: Police Inspector Officer-in-Charge of Panaji Police Station, Panaji, Goa; Public Prosecutor, Panaji, Goa. Respondents' Advoca... |
id_1601 | 0 | This first bail application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on behalf of the applicant Naresh Rajoriya Suresh Rajoriya, who has been in custody since 29 June 2022 in connection with Crime No. 84/2022 registered at Mahila Thana Police Station, District Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, for offen... |
id_1604 | 0 | Re: Appointment of Miss Justice Sonia G Gokani, Judge, High Court of Gujarat, as the Chief Justice of the High Court of Gujarat. By its resolution dated 31 January 2023, the Collegium has recommended the elevation of Mister Justice Aravind Kumar, Chief Justice of the High Court of Gujarat, as a Judge of the Supreme Cou... |
id_1605 | 0 | Petitioner: Satyaprakash. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and six others. Counsel for the petitioner: Mohammad Khalid, Pawan Kumar Yadav. Counsel for the respondents: G. A. Additional Government Advocate Honourable Justice Anjani Kumar Mishra, Judge; Honourable Justice Deepak Verma, Judge. The learned counsel for th... |
id_1607 | 0 | Presented on: 31/08/2016 Registered on: 01/09/2016 Decided on: 28/04/2022 Duration: 05 years 07 months 28 days Exhibit-27 The State of Maharashtra (Through Colaba Police Station, Mumbai) Crime Report No. 95/2016 dated 20/06/2016 Prosecution Rohit Chandrakant Jadhav, aged about 26 years, residing at G-3, Mandhareshwar N... |
id_1608 | 0 | Criminal Appeal No.213 of 2022 dated the 14th day of June, 2022 Jayachandran, J., Whether a Special Court constituted under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 can invoke the powers under Section 306 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to grant pardon to an accused at the post‑cognizance stage is the issue posed ... |
id_1608 | 1 | The term \concerned\ as an adjective may mean interested or involved. The term \privy\ is defined in Wharton’s Law Lexicon (15th Edition) as having participation in some act, so as to be bound thereby (Woodhouse v. JenKins [(1832) 9 Bing 441]). Thus, the expression \privy to\ indicates a larger, active and direct parti... |
id_1609 | 0 | Supreme Court of India Collegium has recommended the name of Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judicial Officer, for appointment as Judge of the High Court of Chhattisgarh in the following terms: On 6 August 2023, the Chief Justice of the High Court of Chhattisgarh in consultation with his two senior-most colleagues made the ab... |
id_1612 | 0 | On 24 January 2022, per Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, the Supreme Court of India heard Mr Ravi Teja Padiri, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr Subrahmanyam Sriram, learned Advocate General, along with Mr N Aswartha Narayana, learned Government Pleader, Services I, for the respondents No 1 to 3., The ... |
id_1615 | 0 | Samir Rajesh Sathe and Samir Hussain Shaikh, Appellant, versus the State of Maharashtra and Another, Respondents. Mr. Sunil R. Pandey with Mr. Raju Manpal for the Appellant. Ms. Anamika Malhotra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Ms. Vrushali Raje, Appointed Advocate for Respondent No. 2., The Appellant is co... |
id_1616 | 0 | (Diary No. 45777/2018) Beghar Foundation through its Secretary and Another Petitioner versus Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retired) and Others Respondent; Jairam Ramesh Petitioner versus Union of India and Others Respondent; M.G. Devasahayam Petitioner versus Union of India and Another Respondent; Mathew Thomas Petitioner v... |
id_1618 | 0 | Date of Decision: 19th February, 2021. W.P. (C) 2297/2021 & CM Applications 6685/2021, 6686/2021. Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vrinda Bhandari, Mr. Abhinav Sekhri, Ms. Sanjana Srikanumar, Mr. Krishnesh Sapat and Ms. Sonali Malik, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, Mahaj... |
id_162 | 0 | Date of Decision: 24 August 2023. Through Mr Mahendra Kumar Mohanty, Petitioner-in-Person, versus through Mr Ajay Digpaul, Chief General Secretary with Mr Amit Gupta, Mr Kamal Digpaul, Ms Swati Kwatra, Mr Saurabh Tripathi, Mr Vikramaditya Singh and Mr Ghanshyam Jha, Advocates for Union of India. Mr Sanjay Katyal, Stand... |
id_1621 | 0 | WP No. 9878/2021 High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore. Parties: Sonu Bairwa versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others. Date of order: 07/07/2021. Bench: Division Bench comprising Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Anil Verma. Judgment delivered by Justice Sujoy Paul. Counsel for petitioner: Shri Mudit Maheshwari, ... |
id_1623 | 0 | Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1861 of 2022. Hemant Soren, aged about 46 years, son of Shibu Soren, resident of Chief Minister House, P.O. Kanke, Police Station Gonda, District Ranchi, Petitioner versus (i) the State of Jharkhand and (ii) Rakesh Ranjan Oraon, Executive Magistrate, Sadar, P.O. and Police Station Ra... |
id_1624 | 0 | Present: Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar, Writ Petition Application 7882 of 2022, Sunita Shukla versus the State of West Bengal & Ors. For the petitioner: Mr. Pratik Dhar, Senior Advocate; Mr. Koustav Bagchi; Mr. Anirudhya Bhattacharyya; Mr. Debayan Ghosh; Ms. Priti Kar; Ms. Cardina Roy. For the State: Mr. Amitesh Banerj... |
id_1624 | 1 | His liberty is in the very nature of things circumscribed by the very fact of his confinement and therefore his interest in the limited liberty left to him is rather precious. The duty of care on the part of the State is strict and admits of no exceptions. The wrongdoer is accountable and the State is responsible if a ... |
id_1624 | 2 | This extraordinary power must be exercised sparingly, cautiously and in exceptional situations where it becomes necessary to provide credibility and instil confidence in investigations or where the incident may have national and international ramifications or where such an order may be necessary for doing complete just... |
id_1626 | 0 | No. HHC/GAZ/L4-53/74-VI dated Shimla, 28 July 2021. In the interest of administration, the following transfers and postings of the members of the Himachal Pradesh Judicial Service in the cadre of District Judges, Additional District Judges, Senior Civil Judges and Civil Judges are hereby ordered with immediate effect.,... |
id_1627 | 0 | Date of decision: 22nd May, 2023. Through: Petitioner in person. (Mr. Vikrant N Goyal, Advocate for Respondent -1. Mr. Santosh Kr Tripathi, Senior Counsel, Civil, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi with Mr. Arun Panwar, Mr. Pradyumn Rao and Ms. Mahak Rankawat, Advocate) vs. Prathiba M. Singh, Judge (Oral... |
id_1629 | 0 | Petitioner: Shahida. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. Counsel for Petitioner: Surendra Kumar Tripathi. Counsel for Respondent: Chief Standing Counsel. Honourable Justice Pritinker Diwaker, Honourable Justice Ashutosh Srivastava. Delivered by Honourable Justice Ashutosh Srivastava, Judge., This writ ... |
id_163 | 0 | Date of decision: 10th December 2021. Through Mr. S. V. Rateria, Advocate, versus Through Mr. Amit Chadha, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Sunil, Police Station Model Town. Ms. Mallika Parmar, Advocate for the complainant., This application under Section 438 Criminal Procedure Code has been... |
id_1630 | 0 | Siddharth Mukesh Bhandari, Appellant, versus the State of Gujarat and others, Respondents., Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned interim order dated 14 February 2022 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in the respective Special Criminal Applications Nos. 9112 of 2019, 9111 of 2019 and 9475 ... |
id_1631 | 0 | Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3654/2021 Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2022 Is the Creator or Administrator of a WhatsApp group criminally liable for offensive content posted by a group member?, Gone are the days, when we used short message service or a formal website chat-box to communicate with our kith and k... |
id_1633 | 0 | The tone for this judgment can be set by adverting to the words of Saint Augustine (354‑430 A.D.) in his book, The City of God, Volume 1 (426 A.D.): Without justice, what else is the State but a great band of robbers?, The petitioners, being the owners of the lands in question, approach the Karnataka High Court with Wr... |
id_1635 | 0 | WPA 5441 of 2023 X (Redacted) – Versus The State of West Bengal & Others. Kaushik Gupta, Arijit Bhusan Bagchi for the petitioner; Debasish Ghosh, Debapriya Chatterjee for the State; Ms. Soma Chowdhury Bandhu for the respondent., The petitioner before the High Court of West Bengal is a minor and is a victim of trafficki... |
id_1636 | 0 | Reserved on 17 January 2023 and pronounced on 29 March 2023. The appeal is presented through Mister S.N. Parashar, Advocate, versus through Mister Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate. The present appeal emanates from the judgment dated 12 January 2015 (Impugned Award) passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims... |
id_1637 | 0 | Pronounced on: 04.03.2024 Through: Mr. Samudra Sarangi, Ms. Shruti Raina, Ms. Saloni Jain, Ms. Nitya Jain and Mr. Akash Jain, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Mr. Rishi K. Awasthi, Ms. Roohe Hina Dua, Ms. Shreya Arora and Mr. Avinash Ankit, Advocates for Defendant 1: Mr. Sanjay Ghose, Senior Advocate a... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.