README.md

metadata

license: mit
language:
  - en
tags:
  - swe
  - dockerless
configs:
  - config_name: swe
    data_files: SWE-DockerLess.jsonl

SWE-DockerLess

A SWE-bench-shaped benchmark that needs no Docker, no network and no prebuilt image. Every row carries its own repo snapshot, so an instance is reproduced by writing files to a temp directory, git init, git apply and running pytest.

Rows are byte-for-byte SWE-bench compatible: same field names, same FAIL_TO_PASS / PASS_TO_PASS JSON-string encoding, same "resolved" rule. One extra dockerless object carries the snapshot and the test command.

SWE-DockerLess.jsonl   4 instances, 62.9 KiB (~16k tokens total)
build_dataset.py       rebuilds the jsonl from repos/ + fixed/ + newtests/ and
                       derives F2P/P2P by actually running pytest
run_harness.py         scoring harness (--gold, or --predictions preds.jsonl)
repos/                 the four buggy base repos (the source of the snapshots)
fixed/                 gold-fix versions of the touched files
newtests/              the tests that become test_patch
tools/validate.py      schema, patch-application and budget checks
tools/make_controls.py generates empty / cross / partial negative controls
reports/               harness output for gold and the three controls

Instances

instance_id	repo	the bug	F2P	P2P	gold patch
swedl__miniconf-1	swedl/miniconf	${k} interpolation recurses on cycles (no CircularReferenceError) and $$ never escapes	9	15	41 added lines
swedl__ttlcache-1	swedl/ttlcache	LRU order ignores reads and overwrites; len() counts expired rows	5	12	12 added lines
swedl__cronlite-1	swedl/cronlite	5/15 collapses to {5}; day-of-week 7 rejected	8	21	11 added lines
swedl__semverlite-1	swedl/semverlite	prerelease ordering is lexicographic; prereleases satisfy release ranges	7	19	23 added lines

29 FAIL_TO_PASS tests, 67 PASS_TO_PASS tests. Difficulty is SWE-bench-like rather than toy-like: each fix needs a behaviour change in a real algorithm (recursive descent with cycle detection, an LRU invariant, cron field expansion, semver precedence), and the hidden tests pin exact semantics — error message text, the 0-6 weekday scale, the "prerelease must opt in" range rule — that a shallow patch misses. The partial control below scores 5/9, 2/5, 6/8 and 3/7 F2P without resolving a single instance.

Row schema

field	notes
instance_id	swedl__<repo>-1
repo	swedl/<repo>
base_commit	real 40-char sha of the snapshot commit (deterministic)
patch	gold fix, git diff unified diff against base_commit
test_patch	adds test files only, never touches source
problem_statement	issue-style report; states the contract, never names a test
hints_text	""
created_at, version	2026-10-30, 1.0
environment_setup_commit	equals base_commit
FAIL_TO_PASS, PASS_TO_PASS	JSON-encoded strings, as in SWE-bench
dockerless.files	{path: content} snapshot of the repo at base_commit
dockerless.test_cmd	python -m pytest -v --tb=no -p no:cacheprovider {tests}
dockerless.test_files	the node-id prefixes to run

Running it

python -m pip install pytest          # the only dependency
python build_dataset.py               # regenerate + re-verify the jsonl
python run_harness.py --gold          # sanity check, expect 4/4
python run_harness.py --predictions predictions/partial.jsonl --out reports/partial.json

A predictions file is JSONL of {"instance_id", "model_name_or_path", "model_patch"} — the SWE-bench format. resolved requires all F2P and all P2P to pass.

Verified results

$ python run_harness.py --gold
instance               resolved  F2P     P2P     note
swedl__miniconf-1      yes       9/9     15/15   ok
swedl__ttlcache-1      yes       5/5     12/12   ok
swedl__cronlite-1      yes       8/8     21/21   ok
swedl__semverlite-1    yes       7/7     19/19   ok
resolved 4/4 (100.0%) in 10.3s

$ python run_harness.py --predictions predictions/empty.jsonl     -> 0/4
$ python run_harness.py --predictions predictions/cross.jsonl     -> 0/4
$ python run_harness.py --predictions predictions/partial.jsonl   -> 0/4

build_dataset.py is the ground truth for F2P/P2P: it materialises a clean checkout, applies test_patch, runs pytest, applies patch, runs pytest again, and classifies every test by observed outcome. It refuses to write a row if the gold patch leaves any failure behind, if F2P is empty, or if a test disappears.

Budget

Measured for max_tokens = 2048, context = 240000:

• prompt per instance: ~2.0k–2.6k tokens (problem statement + snapshot)
• gold patch: 11–41 added lines, ~200–700 tokens — comfortably inside 2048
• whole dataset: ~16k tokens, so all four rows fit in one context if you want

Deliberate deviations from SWE-bench

• Synthetic repos. These are four purpose-built Python packages, not real GitHub projects, so there is no repo clone step and no upstream history.
• Snapshot in the row instead of a Docker image. base_commit is a genuine commit sha of that snapshot, so git apply and git diff behave normally.
• No install step. Packages are importable from the repo root, so dockerless.install is empty and pytest runs with the repo as rootdir.
• Python only, single language, to keep the harness to python + git + pytest.