thread_id
stringlengths 37
43
| source_file
stringlengths 35
37
| subject
stringlengths 0
231
⌀ | messages
stringlengths 88
34.9k
| message_count
int64 1
42
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031153.txt_18938
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031153.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 08, 2011 04:51 PM", "subject": null, "body": "In taking his case to Washington, Mr. Aliyev has variously sought safe passage to the United States, help in recovering $2 billion that relatives claimed they lost from seized businesses, or at least the satisfaction of embarrassing Mr. Nazarbayev. For his part, the Kazakh leader wants to make sure that the Americans stay out of the dispute, and not allow it to affect their alliance with his government.\n\nThe Obama administration has done just that. Through comments in secret diplomatic cables, the former ambassador to Kazakhstan made clear his wariness of being drawn in.\n\n“Both sides — the government and Aliyev — seek to manipulate us to their own advantage,” Richard E. Hoagland, who ended his term as United States ambassador early this year, wrote in February 2009 in one of more than a dozen State Department cables obtained by the antisecrecy group WikiLeaks that mentioned the dispute. [*]\n\nMr. Nazarbayev, 70, [*]a former steel worker and Soviet-era Communist Party leader, has been in power for two decades, presiding over Central Asia’s most vibrant economy. Human rights activists, however, have long accused him of persecuting dissidents and political opponents.\n\nMr. Aliyev, 48, [*]has served as chief of the tax police, deputy foreign affairs minister and head of the Kazakh equivalent of the K.G.B. But critics say he used his clout to secretly take over private companies for financial gain, often by threatening violence.\n\nNow hiding somewhere in Europe, he has been convicted back home on what he claims are trumped-up criminal charges, including a coup attempt. His wife divorced him in June 2007, and the Kazakh government has taken businesses owned by him and members of his extended family. [*]\n\nNo longer powerful at home, Mr. Aliyev turned to Washington, knowing that his former father-in-law cared greatly about his reputation there. Early in 2008 he hired RJI Government Stra 5, a sroup whose consultants included Tanya Rahall, sister of Representative Nick J. ul m4 a : West reemve Democrat; and a friend of Representative Darrell Issa, Republican of California. Both congressmen were booked on a trip to Kazakhstan\n\nto discuss energy policy with Mr. Nazarbayev. Before their departure, members 0 A urge him to express strong concerns about the\n\nharm done to a relative of Mr. Aliyev named Devincci Hourani, whose oil-company assets in Kazakhstan were seized, according to a letter to Mr. Issa from RJI.\n\nMr. Issa, who had developed a rapport with the Kazakh president on an earlier visit, nonetheless agreed to take up the plight of Mr. Hourani. Though he stepped into the fight, he still maintained a close connection to the president, nominating him that summer for the Nobel Prize, a move that drew ridicule from human rights activists. aces right, of Vista, CA] [*]\n\nNY vorked ¢ of sv and later for Mr. Hourani through 2010, contacting the offices of at least +0 dozen members af Congress. They included Representative Howard L. Berman, Democrat of California, then chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, whose office said he discussed the dispute with the State Department.\n\nMs. Rahall also pursued a second strategy. “The alternative is to embarrass the existing regime,” she wrote in a July 2008 e-mail to her boss.\n\nShe pressed House members to criticize the Kazakh government’s human rights record. At her request, at least five statements were published in the Congressional Record, one citing Mr. Aliyev as a victim of his government. Separately, Mr. Aliyev offered to provide the Justice Department with documents that he claimed could prove that his former father-in-law accepted bribes from a businessman representing American oil companies that were seeking drilling rights in Kazakhstan"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022927.txt_18942
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022927.txt
|
FW: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Hill, James E. TE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, 4/22/15", "subject": "FW: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Hill, James E.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 1:57 PM", "subject": "FW: inquiry from ABC News re Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.txt_18945
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028974.txt
|
Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)
|
[{"sender": "Moshe Hoffman", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/3/2016 4:51:28 PM", "subject": "Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)", "body": "Hi Jeff,\nThanks again for making the time for me last time you were in town. And for your introductions to Brockman\nand Ehud. I have enjoyed all the conversations and been learning a lot. Hopefully, a book or two will come out\nof it eventually as well. Means a lot to me.\nMartin mentioned that you are thinking about the top questions in various fields and suggested I might think of\nsome of my own and pass them on to you.\nIn case you are interested, I list below the five biggest questions that keep me up at night, motivate my life's\nwork, and which I think ought to keep up every social scientist. Happy to discuss with you, if and when you are\ninterested.\n-Moshe\n1) Where do our moral and political views come from?\nThe bull shit answers most people accept clearly don't fit the facts; we are not discovering moral truths through\nreason, and our political views are not motivated by a desire to achieve the best policy outcomes. So what does\ndrive these beliefs? And what causes them to have the weird puzzling features they do (e.g., why is a lie of\ncommission so much worse than a lie of omission)? And what causes them to change over time (e.g., slavery\nhas been accepted as moral at many points in history)? And differ across cultures (e.g., ISIS versus the U.S.)?\nAnd across person and context (e.g., Trump vs. Bernie supporters)?\nMore generally, we believe and argue all sorts of crap (your vote can make a difference, Jesus loves you, all\nmen are created equal). How do these beliefs and arguments work? Are they just random ideas propagated by\nan amorphous culture, viruses taking advantage of our own psychology for their benefit, ideas that get us to do\nthe bidding of their cynical designers?\n2) Similarly, where do our tastes come from? Like the art we like? Or the music?\nSome tastes are kinda obvious. E.g., we evolved to like young curvy women because they are the most fertile.\nAnd maybe we like art that reminds us of this or of landscapes that are safe or what not. But there are many\naspects of art and music (e.g. modern art, rap) that are not universally pleasing. So what makes people like these\nthings? What properties do they need to succeed? What role does the artist or the history of the piece play in\nwhat we like? Of course, this question isn't just about art and music, but about all of our peculiar, culturally\nspecific tastes. How does culture shape our tastes? Is it completely arbitrary or is there some logic to its\ninfluence?\n3) Where do our political and economic institutions come from and what causes them to have the peculiar\nstructure they have?\nWe have one vote per person, but everyone knows dollars can buy more votes, and voters in small states are\nbetter represented than those in large states. Whose interests are being served and why theirs? Many economists\nand political scientists have thought about \"optimal institutions.\" And much comparative and historical work\nhas been done. But there isn't really a good unified theory of how these evolve, what characteristics are likely to\nemerge, and in what ways they are or are not optimal.\n4) Is there a fundamental theory of human societies that's analogous to Darwin's theory in biology?\nCan that framework be as well supported by evidence and as simple as natural selection in biology, that will\nlikewise explain the interesting things humans do, like, and believe, and the institutions we construct?\nEvolutionary psychologists think this doesn't require a new theory, just an investigation of the mind that\nbiologically evolved on the Savannah. Others like Dawkins have suggested that we are best understood as\nmachines infested by viruses of the mind which themselves evolve to take advantage of our evolved\npsychology. Anthropologists treat culture as just random inputs. Social psychologists document the funny\nquirks of our behavior without explaining where they come from. And economists assume people optimize\ngiven their tastes and beliefs but take those as given. Is one of these the right theory, if not is there a more\ncompelling theory out there? What will it look like? How will we find it? How will we know we have found it,\nwhen we have?\n5) How can we fix the perverse incentives in academia?\nResearchers get hired and promoted for publishing in top journals. Journal publication is determined by editors\nand referees. The best way to publish is to make sure your allies are the referees, cite their work, and don't step\non their toes, and to convince the editor you are famous enough and your work is flashy enough that it will be\nwell cited and get covered by the nytimes. None of this requires much attention be paid to truth, insight, or\noriginally.\nArguably, this is why the social sciences are such a mess. Few bother to incorporate evidence or arguments\nfrom outsiders (e.g., social psychologists don't consult historians, economists barely consult social\npsychologists). Few bother to question the fundamental assumptions driving their field that make no sense and\ngo unchecked (e.g., anthropologists treat culture as random inputs). And many researchers end up spending\ntheir whole careers developing and propagating theories that are completely uninteresting to outsiders, or\nobviously fallacious to anyone not steeped in their literature.\nIt is ridiculous that we're still using a system derived from the Society of Letters of the 1500s. Perhaps it's time\nfor something more like Wikipedia, where information gets aggregated and contributors are incentivizes by\ntheir reputation as competent editors to integrate information from across disciplines? Or something like Reddit,\nwhere quality research is recognized by upvotes that aggregate the opinion of thousands from diverse fields? Or\na certification system of sorts, where papers are certified as having done their statistics right or having\nintegrated what's known from certain fields, or not citing irrelevant papers for political reasons? Whatever the\nsolution is, social scientists and engineers who work on this problem will have orders of magnitude more impact\non science than scientists doing primary research in our archaic system."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029433.txt_18948
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029433.txt
|
Fwd: Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 11:00:51 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act", "body": "Richard Kahn\nHBRK Associates Inc.\n575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor\nNew York, NY 10022\ntel\nfax\ncel"}, {"sender": "\"Ruberto Israel & Weiner\" <info@riw.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "January 3, 2018 at 4:02:49 PM EST", "subject": "Ruberto, Israel & Weiner Trusts & Estates Alert: Estate Planning After the Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act", "body": "January 2018"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028960.txt_18953
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028960.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 9:24 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "we dont teach children to see. they have a visual grammar built in. why wouldnt we expect some mutation of that system to allow auditory grammar."}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "We don't teach children language either, contrary to many beliefs. The visual grammar just grows, and as is known, can develop in various ways depending on early experience. Same with the language grammar, though the period in which experience has a shaping effect is much longer.\n\nHowever, there are fundamental differences between vision and language. Can send you a recent paper about it if you like. Vision is an input system. Language isn't. It's an internal capacity, a system of knowledge, which is used to process input and also to produce thoughts (sometimes externalized). Seems also to be modality independent. And their properties look wholly different, so it's hard to see how one could piggy-back on the other.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:48 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "The hardware of vision is an input system, It's the software that I'm referring to ."}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I presume that the software just guides the hardware. Don't see how that changes the considerations."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:48 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Vision rules needed to craft coherent image . Edges? \" Faggehtabowtit.\" Two edges crafted by software"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "This is the program David Marr initiated, developed by Shimon Ullman and others. Makes sense, and there are some interesting results. David was a friend, and we often discussed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels adapted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the fundamental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coherent images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it's not what language is.\n\nThat fundamental difference, along with the fact that the principles involved seem quite different, has always been a stumbling block to seeking any link."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "thought you might be interested in a new version of the percentage agreement between stalin and churchill. Saudi and Iran doing the same, dividing spheres of influence. . it seems few people paying attention to palestinians . maybe next generation. - israel going further right it appears. I find that media induced fear is driving world markets. . very odd. gas prices down nobody shopping, . hotel prices down less travel, commodity prices way down, little building. luxury market decimated. no russians or chinese players. . still virtually zero interest rates. . borrowing not up, fear and paralysis. , ( I add these topics as to these at least, i can speak with a modicum of knowledge )"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 5:37:14 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Very interesting topics. Would like to hear more from you about them, when we have a chance. Is it worldwide, or mostly here?\n\nMy impression is that the fear is mostly in the US. There's nothing in (much more vulnerable) Europe comparable to the Visa Waiver program (insanely targeting Iran, which has not been involved in terrorism, while exempting Saudi Arabia, the source of almost all jihadi terrorism). Or Trump-style ban them all. Or Cruz-style carpet-bomb them. For a long time, probably back to colonial days, this has been a very frightened country, maybe the safest in the world but also the most frightened. Impressions.\n\nSometimes it's quite weird. By accident, I took the first flight PanAm 103 after the Lockerbie bombing, together with an old friend, a veteran Middle East correspondent. It must have been the safest flight in human history. The plane was empty. We were bumped up to first class because there was no one there."}]
| 8
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032558.txt_18955
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032558.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "catch up today?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Buying a new kayak...hard negotiations going on...will call when I am done...Rudy next ag..."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-ohio-campaign-rally-trump-offers-an-unfiltered-view-of-his-presidency/2017/07/25/dbbf6792-7188-11e7-8839-ec48ec4cae25_story.html?utm term=.37edla334d20"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 9:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If trump fires mueller and gets away with it it is 1933 berlin"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-ohio-campaign-rally-trump-offers-an-unfiltered-view-of-his-presidency/2017/07/25/dbbf6792-7188-11e7-8839-ec48ec4cae25_story.html?utm term=.37edla334d20"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/26/2017 3:08:07 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you know if your boy barrack is close witha lebanese/nigerian biz guy named chagoury?"}]
| 6
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019203.txt_18965
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019203.txt
|
Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Leah Reis-Dennis"], "timestamp": "12/19/2016 4:36:41 AM", "subject": "Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America", "body": "Dear \nJeffrey \n(and please see note at bottom), \nThis end-of-the-year letter is to catch you up on developments and to report progress made in 2016 \nby Poetry in America, by its associated non-profit production company, Verse Video Education, and \nby (and with) our new Harvard partner, the Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. Whether \nyou are a longstanding adviser and supporter of Poetry in America, or you've more recently joined our \ncircle of proponents, your contributions, thought partnership and enthusiasm have made this year's \nsuccesses possible. \nLast fall, I knew this would be a crucial year. Goals for 2016 included moving our co-produced \ntelevision series, Poetry in America, toward a concrete release date (now entering post-production, \nwe launch nationwide in April 2018), converting our six HarvardX MOOC modules into for-credit \ncourses (now complete and being offered by Harvard's Division of Continuing Education), and getting \nthe word out on our first course developed especially for K-12 educators, Poetry in America for \nTeachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. With a mission of creating and distributing the highest-\nquality humanities content for a wide variety of learners, our projects now rely on a salaried \nproduction staff of five, a rotating corps of part timers and contractors, and a growing cohort of \nHarvard graduate students, undergraduates and interns whom we train in the public-facing \nhumanities. Growing fast, in 2016 we more firmly established Verse Video Education as a nimble and \nstable producer of humanities-based content (now including an archive of over 120 separate \ninterviews with distinguished discussants), while also defining a forward-looking partnership and \ngrowth strategy with Harvard. As 2016 draws to a close, I have much progress to report. \nVerse Video Education: Independent 501c3 \nIn April 2016, Verse Video Education, the fledgling production company I'd founded in 2014, received \nIRS approval and became a 501c3. Now capable of accepting philanthropic contributions, Verse \nVideo Education has also begun to generate revenue by producing high-quality educational media for \nother institutions. Clients within our first year included Greenwich Country Day School, YIVO Institute \nfor Jewish Research, Schlesinger Library, Harvard Institute for Global Health, and Project Zero. While \nphilanthropic donations remain essential, work for clients allows us to amplify the impact of \nphilanthropic donations, not only permitting additional investment in our flagship partnerships with \nWGBH and Harvard, but also fostering development of new partnerships and projects. These include \na video series on poetry and science now running with award-winning magazine Nautilus, a \ncollaboration with distinguished poet Robert Pinsky and his Favorite Poem Project, and an expansion \nof our poetry film series with partners at The Nantucket Project. Advised by a stellar and diversely \ntalented board, Verse Video Education is looking toward sustainability. We are now discussing \ndistribution of new content with a variety of stakeholders, including media providers in China. \nNew Harvard Partner: Bok Center for Teaching and Learning \nMeanwhile, Poetry in America has deepened its partnership and formulated a plan for growth going \nforward at Harvard. This fall, Harvard's Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Mike Smith, \nendorsed the integration and expansion of my public-facing humanities work within the Derek Bok \nCenter for Teaching and Learning. As a Bok Fellow this year, and alongside Bok director Rob Lue in \nthe years to come, I will be working to substantially expand Bok's capacity and resources to train \nhumanists in 21st-century methods of public engagement-- developing courses, digital fellowship \nopportunities and also securing distribution outlets and partners for content produced in Bok by \nHarvard humanists. By next year at this time, I will be turning some of my attention beyond poetry (my \nfavorite, but hardly the only humanistic mode of communication!) to create a wider base of \nhumanities materials for use in American schools and other institutions. We will begin integrating and \nanchoring Poetry in America content (on art, sport and play; on the environment; and on health and \nwell being) with content created by others. As I continue to experiment with use of digital media \nwithin my residential courses for undergraduates and graduates, I shall also be working with other \nfaculty and graduate students. My work at Bok will also facilitate collaborations between humanists \nworking across the whole university. Projects for 2017 include work with HarvardX on drama and \nShakespeare, with Harvard's Center for the Environment, with the Arts and Humanities Initiative at \nHarvard Medical School, and with several programs within Harvard's Graduate School of Education. \nLaunching in 2017: Our First Course Designed Specifically for Teachers \nVerse Video Education has allocated much of its staff time this year to bringing its first course \ndesigned specifically to support the American secondary classroom to completion. Poetry in America \nfor Teachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop draws on assets created at HarvardX, along with \nfootage captured with our TV partners and independently by Verse Video Education. The resulting \ncourse, designed for English, Social Studies, and Arts teachers, as well as for librarians, \nadministrators and others, provides deep content instruction as well as pedagogical training. \nCommon Core aligned, this course, the first of its kind, is now open for enrollment, and will launch \nJanuary 23rd. We are currently discussing group enrollments with major educational systems and \nreformers across the nation, and we are also raising scholarship funds for strapped enrollees. Over \ntime, we hope to play a leading role in improving literacy and in strengthening the humanities across \nthe American educational landscape. \nAiring Nationwide in 2018: Poetry in America, The Television Series \nIn May 2016, Verse Video Education was asked by WGBH and American Public Television to expand \nits television series in development from 8 to 13 episodes, listed below. \nThe following episodes are entering post-production: \nOn Edward Hirsch's \"Fast Break\": Shaquille O'Neal, Pau Gasol, Shane Battier, Edward Hirsch, \nand an on-court pick-up basketball chorus filmed at Success Academy Charter School; On W.H. \nAuden's \"Musee Des Beaux Arts\": Ambassador Samantha Power, David Brooks, Peter Sacks; On \nRobert Hayden's \"Those Winter Sundays\": Vice President Joe Biden, Elizabeth Alexander, Angela \nDuckworth, Kevin Young, and a chorus of fathers and sons; On Carl Sandburg's \"Skyscraper\": \nFrank Gehry, Robert Polito, and a chorus of Young Student Poets; On Nas's \"New York State of \nMind\": Nas, Russell Simmons, Salamishah Tillet, Steve Stoute, and a chorus of hip hop heads; On \nGalway Kinnell's \"The Grey Heron\": E.O. Wilson, Robert Hass, Laura McPhee; On Gwendolyn \nBrooks's \"To Prisoners\": Anna Deveare Smith, Reginald Dwayne Betts, Li-Young Lee and a \nchorus of exonerees from the Innocence Project; On William Carlos Williams's \"This Is Just To \nSay\": Woody Allen, Jane Hirshfield, Rafael Campo and a chorus of couples young and old; On \nLangston Hughes's \"Harlem\": President Bill Clinton, Herbie Hancock, Sonia Sanchez and a chorus \nof children from Promise Academy; On Allen Ginsberg's Hymmnn from \"Kaddish\" and \"Hum \nBom\": Bono, Juan Felipe Herrera and a chorus of clergy. \nThe production of the following episodes will wrap early 2017: \nOn Emily Dickinson's \"I cannot dance opon my Toes\": Cynthia Nixon, Yo Yo Ma, Marie Howe \nand Bill T. Jones; On Marianne Moore's \"The Fish\": Jorie Graham, Edward Norton, Conservation \nInternational scientists, and the passengers and crew of oceanographic vessel The Alucia; On \nElizabeth Bishop's \"One Art\" or Edna St. Vincent Millay's \"Four Sonnets.\" \nJeffrey, \nJust a quick note to thank you again for all the help you've given me. The generous contribution you \nmade last year to Verse Video Education is now in use (we've hired our new editor!). Once he helps \nus to plow through the work of this year, we'll begin to look forward to crafting educational content on \nthe literature of art, sport and play (these materials now including footage from recent shoots with \nShaquille O'Neal, Yo Yo Ma, Cynthia Nixon, Bono and others). 100K makes so much possible. \nBut, of course, you've also been a key preceptor as I've learned how --squirming all the way--the \nsausage really gets made in public television. I can't say I've been entirely successful in taming costs \nthere, but I've been far better armed and more mindful of what they should be after the stern tutorial \nyou administered. \nWhenever Templeton might be ready to evaluate another application, I'm ready for another proposal \nfor them. I wonder if you might arrange a meeting for me with the famous Bamaby? I can't yet afford a \ngrant writer, and so the time one of these suckers takes makes me think doing more advance \nreconnaissance is crucial. Would he meet with me? Kosher? I'd also love to meet with the Blacks as I \nget closer to making content on theatre. I hope that Debra is well. \nAnd heard there's another little Jeff in the caribbean... \nBest,"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030691.txt_18968
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030691.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great. I m thrilled for you. At the moment he's coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <1.1MMIIMOMMI>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:16:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime...."}]
| 6
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033120.txt_18969
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033120.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jack LANG"], "timestamp": "9/20/2018 10:01:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i was offline for yom kippur . can you put me in direct contact.? happy holiday"}, {"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\nOnce again you are right.\nSee you soon,\nWith my friendship,\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack", "tom", "tom jacques"], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014860.txt_18981
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014860.txt
|
EU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE: SALES TOP PICKS = SOC GEN, INTESA, NORDEA
|
[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:24:59 PM", "subject": "EU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE: SALES TOP PICKS = SOC GEN, INTESA, NORDEA", "body": "We remain positive on banks that can make acceptable returns in the current environment and are geared into the upside when rates begin to recover... ING, KBC, Intesa, Unicredit, SocGen, Erste, BKIR are all Buy rated.\n\nGlobal Equities\nSpecialist Sales - European Financials\n\nMAR disclosure\n\nEU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE\nSpec Sales Comment:\nBig Equity outflows but we see this is a pause not a reversal\nBofAML latest flow show data this morning shows the largest equity outflows in 40 weeks and first outflows YTD (click here). Our BofAML Bull & Bear Indicator is now at 7.1, the highest level since Jul'14 and not far from \"sell\" signal. So is this just a pause for breath in the reflation trade? BofAML strategists think so. In our updated thoughts this morning we think reflation is real so stay long equities, short rates, selectively long USD (click here).\n\nChart 12: BofAML B&B Indicator (scale from 0 to 10)\n13mdt\nFeb.16 lows\nToday\n10\nExtreme Extreme\nBearish Bullish\nSource BotA Merniloynch Global Investment Strategy\n\nWhy do we remain bullish the reflation trade?\nThe main reasons for equity investor concern in recent weeks = the gap between hard and soft data, plus the delay in the Trump fiscal package\n\nChart 1: The gap between hard and soft data is a concern to investors Chart 2: Mediocre US Q1 data partly down to seasonal adjustments\nResidual seasonality in GDP growth from 1985 to 2015\n25\n2 08\n15 06\n1\n04\n05 0 02\n-0 5 0\n-1\n-1 5 -0 2\n-2 -0 4\n-2 5 01 00 01/02 01104 01/06 0108 01/10 01/12 01/14 01/16 -0 6\n-0 8\n—Surveys & Business Cycte Indicators —Hard Data\n-1\nScs,oce SoM Mend Lynch Glcbal Research Bloortf-ri\n01\nSource Cleveland Federal Reserve\n• GDP\n• Pnvate Investment\n• Government consumptron & investment\n02\n03\n04\n\nWe continue to believe in the reflation theme because:\n1. Strength in the global economy is genuine - European PMIs are at 6 year highs, Chinese and Japanese PMIs continue to improve too. In fact —90% of PMIs globally are above 50 and 60% have increased in the last 3 months.\n2. Earnings revisions and Global Wave point to continued upturn - earnings revisions now above 1.0 for the first time since 2011.\n3. We expect Trump to deliver on tax, even if it is smaller than hoped for - should such a package be put together it would likely support the Trump trade once again after the failure to reform Obamacare\n4. Bond markets are being too sanguine about the likely pace of Fed tightening - the Fed funds curve is once again well below the dot plot. We continue to see upside in yields if and when the market becomes more convinced that the soft data is right.\n\nChart 7: Bond yields have pulled back from FOMC highs\n2.7 -\n2.5\n2.3\n2.1\n1.9\n1.7\n1.5\n1.3\nfAINA\nCO CO CO CD GO tO CD CO CO CO CO CO N.- N.-\n—UST 10y yield\nC 9.4. 5, 1 .7 3-3 <-81A\nSource Btoombero\n\nChart 8: As the market refuses to price the dot plot\n250-\n200 -\n150\n100 -\n50\n1\n0\n—Current market pncmg\nMedian dot. Mar-17 SEP\n—BofAML forecast\n# of meetings into tightening cycle\n4 8 12 16 20 24\nSource SofA !item' Lynch 7,PRearcti Bloomberg\n\nEuropean Banks holding up better than US Peers on pull back\nIn Banks, the reoccurring feedback from investors has been that clients have rotated out of US banks and into European banks. This conflicts with our latest Fund Manager Survey which suggested allocation to European Banks fell the most of any sector MoM in the first two weeks of March, however, its true European Banks have quickly reversed the performance gap to US peers. The spread between the SX7E and S5BANKX Index is back to pre-US election levels.\n\nWhat the EU banks bulls are saying:\nEUR rates are going higher it's just a matter of timing, positive EPS revisions continue, EU is starting to see pockets of volume growth and asset yield recovery, credit spreads have been tightening YTD and\n\nattractive valuations of EU banks vs. US peers (EU banks on 12.0x 2017E PIE vs. US Banks on -14x and some EU banks still on a large discount vs 10-year historical median P/B valuations).\n\nWhat the EU banks bears are saying:\nEU macro declining, US lead re-flation trade cooling (tax, deregulation, healthcare headwinds) and toppy multiples/high ownership of EU banks going into Q1 results. They believe the pressure will be off Draghi to act on the deposit rate if the macro starts to reverse which may cause people to push back the assumed timing of European rate hikes and tapering. The French election is also a big risk factor which is clearly holding back some global investors from buying into Europe.\n\nRates Update\nConsensus has started to factor in the higher rate outlook in Europe. The bears are pointing out that these probabilities have fallen a lot this week while the bulls argue it's just a matter of timing.\nI monitor market expectations for ECB normalisation in rates using the World Interest Rate Probability (WIRP) function on Bloomberg. It's been very volatile recently. I currently see the market is pricing a 16.6% probability of a EUR rate hike before the end of 2017 (row 6, column 2 below). a 32.7% probability in the next 12 months (row 9, column 2) and a 67.6% probability in the next 18 months.\nEi Ir.-.\n• Instrument\n3 Future Implied Probability\nCurrent Implied Probabilities\n1) Overview\nOIS: Eurozone OIS - Deposit F(\nDates o Meeting Calculation\nMeeting Prob Of Hike Prob of Cut\n04/27/2017 0.0% 2A'\n06/08/2017 0.0% 3.3%\n07/20/2017 2.1% 3.2%\n09/07/2017 7.2% 3.1%\n10/26/2017 8.8% 3.0%\n12/14/2017 16.6% 2.8%\n01/25/2018 21.6% 2.6%\n03/08/2018 29.4% 2.3%\n04/26/2018 32.7% 2.2%\n06/14/2018 41.4% 1.9%\n• Historical Analysis for Meeting\n:17/2017\n) Add\nikal ted\n-0.6\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n0.0%\n• Current Rate -0.40\n,•2 rates\nIn Based on rate -0.40\n.)-1 '07/2017\n-0.5\n2.4%\n3.3%\n3 2%\n3.1%\n3.0%\n2.7%\n2.6%\n2.3%\n2.2%\n-0.4\n97.6%\n96.7%\n94,6%\n89.7%\n88.2%\n80.6%\n75.8%\n68.2%\n65.1%\n•4) Add/Remove Series\n-0.3 -0.2 BPS•\n0.0% 0.0% -0.2\n0.0% 0.0% -0.3\n2.1% 0,0% -0.1\n7.1% 0.1% 0.4\n8.6% 0.2% 0.6\n15.6% 1.0% 1.5\n19.6% 1.9% 2.1\n25.4% 3.7% 3.1\n27.5% 4.8% 36\n32.5% 7.8% 5.0.\n\nAs a reminder our research team estimate that euro area banks could see as much as €26bn in earnings uplift from a return of ECB rates to zero. This would represent a 25% uplift to profits - a big prize when it happens (click here for report).\n\nWhat to buy in banks if you share our view on sustained reflation?\nWe remain positive on banks that can make acceptable returns in the current environment and are geared into the upside when rates begin to recover... ING, KBC, Intesa, Unicredit, SocGen, Erste, BKIR are all Buy rated.\nTop picks:\nBuy Soc Gen, PO C55\n• Still fourth worst performer in the SX7E YTD due to French election overhang.\n• Yet reported a strong set of Q4 results, beating on P&L, capital and dividend which comforts our view that the stock is set for re-rating.\n• Continues to tick a number of boxes offering a dividend yield of 5.1% in 2017E, an attractive valuation of 0.79x 2017e TNAV, solid capital position and has strong EPS momentum.\n• Our EPS (2017 and 2018) is 10% above consensus with further upside from CIB, Russia recovery and Corporate Center\n• Stronger capital position allows for growth (organic and bolt-on M&A)\nBuy Intesa, PO C2.80\n• On NPEs, capital, profitability, operating trends, and cash payouts, Intesa stands above other Italian banks in our view.\n• ISP will pay a dividend (confirmed) equivalent to an 8.0% yield vs. a 4.0% European banks average and on our estimates\n• Italian banks are trading at a PNAV discount to ISP but their profitability is half that of ISP's and their capital is lower\n• ISP retains the lowest (gross/net) Italian NPE ratio and in 4Q16 NPE were down yoy by 8% gross/10% net.\n• Shares have suffered from the uncertainty related to a possible tie-up with insurer Generali - still the seventh worst performing bank in the SX7E YTD\nAlso remain very bullish on market exposed Nordic banks\nThis morning we reiterate our preference for Nordic banks (click here for report) with more market exposed revenues and reiterate our Buy ratings on Danske Bank, Nordea, DNB and SEB ahead of Q1 results. We expect to see good fee /trading income in Q1 on the back of strong AUM and continued high activity levels.\nThe relative P/E premium of Nordic banks vs. the sector is now 7% vs. a long term average of 11%. We also note that Nordic banks are expected to continue to deliver close to 4% better ROTE (2017-19E) and have a lower beta.\n\nChart 1: Danske Bank remains best capital return story (Capital buffers as % of market cap)\n300\n200\n100\n00\n208\n69\n13.8\n11.0\nDANSKE SHBA\n10.8 10.8 10.4 10.3\n5.8 6.4 6.1 6.0\n4.9 ZIEN\nSEBA NDA DNB SWEDA\nBuffer 17E Divi + Buyback (not yet executed) Buffer + Dii + Buyback (not executed)\nSource. SofA Merrill Lynch Global Research estimates\n\nPlease let me know if you would like to discuss in more detail or meet any of our analysts on the above reports."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032769.txt_18985
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032769.txt
|
What do u make of latest trump follies?
|
[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "lhsoffice"], "timestamp": "4/14/2018 10:42:58 PM", "subject": "What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Importance: — High\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033311.txt_18995
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033311.txt
|
trump making a nice move ..
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/14/2016 2:33:10 PM", "subject": "trump making a nice move ..", "body": "Election Polls | President Polls | State Polls | Senate Polls | House Polls | Governor Polls | Approval Polls\nWednesday, September 14\n\nRace/Topic (Click to Sort) Poll Results Spread\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton LA Times/USC Tracking Clinton 42, Trump 47 Trump +5\nClinton 39, Trump 39,\n\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs.\n\nJohnson vs. Stein dioica Johnson 8, Stein 2 Tie\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton Reuters/Ipsos Clinton 40, Trump 39 Clinton +1\nOhio: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson Trump 44, Clinton 39,\n\nvs. Stein Blosmbete Johnson 10, Stein 3 Song +\nOhio: Trump vs. Clinton Bloomberg Clinton 43, Trump 48 Trump +5\nMaine: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson Colby Clinton 42, Trump 27, Clinton +3\nvs. Stein College/SurveyUSA Johnson 9, Stein 5\n\nMaine CD2: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Colby Trump 47, Clinton a7, Trump +10\nJohnson vs. Stein College/SurveyUSA Johnson 8, Stein 5\n\n== Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson KSN News/SurveyUSA ae a ioe ce Trump +12\n\nSouth Carolina: Trump vs. Clinton vs.\nJohnson vs. Stein\n\nTrump 53, Clinton 38,\nJohnson 3, Stein 1\n\nTrafalgar Group (R) Trump +15\n\nKansas Senate - Moran vs. Wiesner KSN News/SurveyUSA* Moran 50, Wiesner 34 Moran +16\n\n. Te _ . Colby _ . .\nMaine 2NG Listrict - FOuUquin VS. Wain Folquin SY, Vain 45 +\nMaine 2nd District - Poliquin vs. Cain College/SurveyUSA Poliquin 50, Cain 45 Poliquin +5\nMaine 1st District - Holbrook vs. Colby . .\n\n: +\nes Collese/SurvevUSA Pingree 57, Holbrook 37 ~— Pingree +20\n\n. i .\nPresident Obama Job Approval Reuters/Ipsos a a Tie\n2016 Generic Congressional Vote Reuters/Ipsos as = Democrats +2\nRepublicans 38\n\noo. Right Direction 22, Wrong Wrong Track\nwirecuon Of Vountry ANCULETS/ IPSOS\nDirection of Countr Reuters/Ipsos Track 65 443"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026778.txt_18996
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026778.txt
|
Fwd: Alert: The 2017 Tax Reform Act
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn TS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2018 6:23:09 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Alert: The 2017 Tax Reform Act", "body": "The 2017 Tax Reform Act - Key\nProvisions Impacting Fund Managers\nand Their Funds\n\nFor further information about this Alert,\nplease contact:\n\nAlex Gelinas\nPartner\n\n212.573.8159\nagelinas @sglawyers.com\n\nSteven Etkind\nPartner\n\n212.573.8412\nsetkind@sglawyers.com\n\nPlease feel free to discuss any aspect of\nthis Alert with your regular Sadis &\nGoldberg contact or with any of the"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660.txt_19009
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/9/2015 6:33:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "HE. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island withhim, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033305.txt_19014
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033305.txt
|
good call on pence
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 5:13:01 PM", "subject": "good call on pence", "body": "http://www. nytimes.com/2016/07/15/us/politics/mike-pence-donald-trump-vice-president. html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033463.txt_19017
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033463.txt
|
Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Eric Roth"], "timestamp": "6/27/2011 4:45:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "of course i will speak send me his number , or have him cll"}, {"sender": "Eric Roth", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Gulfstream V - offmarket, sleeper aircraft", "body": "Jeffrey-\n\nI need to start off by stating that it is not my intent to go around Shawn Lancaster on this — Shawn is a friend.\n\nThis being said, I have received e-mails from both you and Larry this weekend.\n\nI called Larry and he said I should send you an e-mail.\n\nI called a close friend of mine inquiring about the GV market and aircraft that are “not published”. As of today, there are\n\neight (8) of these aircraft that are not yet on the market.\n\nLet me know if you would like to speak with him and by what means (you call him, he call you, call Larry?....whatever).\n\nBy the way, his company sold Trumps 727 and got Trump a very attractive number for an aircraft that was on it’s way to\n\na museum.\nHope all is well.\nSincerely,\n\nEric Roth\n\nPresident\n\ninternational jet"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023028.txt_19028
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023028.txt
|
Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\n\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial and the witness list which names and other young women who allege they were underage victims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their claims.\n\nMs further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and instructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of entertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact information is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri Oct 18 2013 at 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 8:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 1:36:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023230.txt_19029
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023230.txt
|
Fwd:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "PLEASE READ CAREFULLY ,\n\nIn the spirit in which it is sent. our friendship is intact and solid , though ,it has taken a hit.\n\nMark was here this morning , the proposed transactions are extremely complex . and would take a\ngreat deal of my detailed time. I do not know how, and even, if ,to move forward - . After months of\nhearing that you would have no problem paying a large fee if you could only ascertain value. The last\ntransaction. a transaction which you saved over 600 million in tax. declared bullet proof by your attnys,\nand even if you want to disoccount for its future realization, creating a savings of over 300 million real\ndollars. For some reason you chose to ignore our agreements , verbal written and emailed -and at the\nvery last minute , after the deal was complete decided that it was only worth 8 million dollars to you and\nyour family. . ( assuming phaidon -richard happens. there is a 24m savings not including artspace and\ndebt write down benefits- certain to come later .. IMPORTANT NOTE\n\nthe phaidon transaction as currently contemplated will not work . WILL NOT !!\n\nWhen we had our meeting in your home in Bedford. You asked me for my help. I told you multiple\ntimes that i thought it was a very bad idea, in that I greatly preferred to have no financial interactions. I\ndon't have many friends and didn't want money in any way to interfere with our unique relationship.\nReminder, For five years you had the kind, but very goofy Eileen Alexandersson as the sole manager of\nyour massive accounting , legal, investments. reporting, trusts etc. When I first told you in no uncertain\nterms that I firmly believed she was incompetent you admonished me for \" speaking out of both sides of\nmy mouth\". With regard Brad Wechsler , there has never been a \" both sides. \". I have consistantly\nmaintained since day one that he was highly unsuited for the job. When you initially asked me to help\n\nfirst to point out that our agreement would cost you too much money, therefore\n\nFrom day one I proposed to discount our agreement toa 50-60 million range. An extremely fair price\nfor all the transactions just completed . including Phaidon. - I was never told that this was out of\nrange. in fact, alternative methods of payment . ie my plane, or an -in-kind payment were discussed (ie\nincluding keeping the 30m portion of the fee outstanding till March ) ,I provided , only because you\nspecifically requested a detailed step by step execution plan and reviewed all documents that i was given\naccess to. ( Phaidon was never forthcoming ) in order to make my many corrections . ( as i said more\nneeded on phaidon ). Iwas then told that Alans involvement warranted a discount . Even in the best\nof light , though it is beyond question that not one time in the three years of his retainer has he ever\nproposed a unique idea. (including any way to deal with the use issue on debras death ,or even the most\nbasic review of your largest asset by far , the BRH agreement. ) O.K. - lets say he made a contribution to\nthe plan and stretch reality beyond the pale and say it was 50 %. though no one could posit such a large\namount unless they were wearing a clown suit. , the payment and our formula of 37 percent associated\nwith the deal was known . It had both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone numerous times ,\n\na detailed execution plan was provided . then and only then, after the entire transaction was laid out for\nthe group to follow You told me that after a number of conversations with brad karp that a total of only\n20m would be paid , (and even that was more than you originally contemplated ) for both transactions .\nLeon I feel It was remarkably unfair. Did brad even knew of our prior agreements.? ?, I would ask that\nyou I and Brad karp sit together if you think it would be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with\nyour consent of course. Ifthe transactions were never consummated , 1 would not be owed a dime,\nhowever , the expected fee was known up front. , the detailed step by step plan was followed and\noverseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the transaction had even begun, had already\nbeen heavily discounted, out of friendship, . I believe the decision re only paying 20m has frankly , left\nme felling quite uneasy. and colors the view about the Athene or Rothschild transaction."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030732.txt_19035
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030732.txt
|
Re: bannon view of trump
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:58 AM", "subject": "Re: bannon view of trump", "body": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X9E9n6GHC8"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/20/2018 2:11:44 PM", "subject": "Re: bannon view of trump", "body": "Haven't watched this yet. But was with him for a few hours last night and got the full download: he think trump has lost his stuff, and as well, to boot, is an idiot. Putin, tho, he thinks is a genius."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029505.txt_19038
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029505.txt
|
Middle Eastern Monarchs Look at the Trumps and See Themselves — Foreign Policy
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/28/2018 10:56:02 PM", "subject": "Middle Eastern Monarchs Look at the Trumps and See Themselves — Foreign Policy", "body": "http://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/28/middle-eastern-monarchs-look-at-the-trumps-and-see-themselves/amp/\n\nMiddle Eastern Monarchs Look at the \nTrumps and See Themselves \nAmerica's Arab allies have always wanted to buy direct access \nto U.S. foreign policy, and they finally found a seller. \nMay 28, 2018 \nIvanka Trump andJared Kushner at the presentation of the Order of Abdulaziz al-Saud \nmedal at the Saudi Royal Court in Riyadh on May 20, 2017.(MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty \nImages) \nAlmost 20 years ago when I was a graduate student living in Cairo, I published an article in \na Washington-based journal called Middle East Insight. The magazine had a solid \nreputation, with a knack for scoring interviews with important people. (In the same edition \nas my piece, titled \"Egypt's Next Generation,\" there was an interview with Gamal Mubarak, \nson of long-term Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who had already begun his rise___ \nthough not yet his eventual fall____as heir apparent.) A few years later, Middle East Insight \ndisappeared. When I heard the news, I figured the magazine was too niche for an expanding \nmedia environment, shrugged my shoulders, and went on with life. \nI hadn't thought about Middle East Insight until its onetime publisher, George Nader, \nrecently exploded into the news as an international man of mystery at the center of an \napparent attempt to covertly influence the outcome of the last American presidential \nelection. It seems that in the span of not quite two decades, the guy who ran a small, likely \nnot profitable, but influential policy magazine become a conduit between Crown Prince \nMohammed bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan of the Abu Dhabi, Saudi Crown Prince \nMohammed bin Salman, and Donald Trump's closest inner circle, both after, and \ncrucially for special counsel Robert Mueller's ongoing criminal investigation___before \nTrump's election as U.S. president. \nNader's story is yet another example of the sleaze, greed, and influence-peddling that has \ncome to seem ordinary in Trump-era Washington. But it also offers a view into a more \nextraordinary and unprecedented problem: a decision by some of America's closest allies in \nthe Middle East to leverage their financial resources in common cause with a bunch \nof ganef s to influence U.S. foreign policy. It is a problem that can be traced back, in ways \nthat haven't generally been understood, to Trump's son-in-law and senior advisor Jared \nKushner and his mobile phone. \nFrom the perspective of the leaders of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Israel (there \nis an Israeli angle to the George Nader story, but it isn't yet entirely clear), and Egypt, there \nwas an entirely rational reason to support Trump's presidential bid and try to influence his \napproach to the Middle East: They did not like former President Barack Obama's Middle \nEast policy. And while they likely understood that presidential nominee Hillary Clinton was \nmore hawkish that the president she served as secretary of state, the Saudis, Emiratis, and \nIsraelis were concerned that she would be tethered to the Iran nuclear deal and thus Obama's \nIran policy. \nThey also believed that Clinton would be soft on Islamists. It is an article of faith in Egypt \nthat she enabled the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and Mohamed Morsi in 2011 and 2012. \nFor countries in the Persian Gulf, Egypt provides strategic depth, and \"losing\" it to the \nMuslim Brotherhood was a major geopolitical blow. The Israelis, for obvious reasons, were \ndeeply concerned about the accumulation of Islamist political power next door and blamed \nthe Obama administration for abandoning Hosni Mubarak, thereby placing Israel's security \nin jeopardy. \nWith Trump, Washington's allies got a candidate and president who referred to the Iran \nnuclear agreement as the \"worst deal ever,\" surrounded himself with people who either \nmake no distinction between al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood or are simply outright \nIslamophobes, and has forthrightly declared that the United States supports its friends in the \nfight against terrorism. Full stop. No caveats, buts, or howevers concerning human rights \nand the need for political reform. To them, this seemed a lot better than the appreciation of \nnuance and complexity that was a hallmark of the Obama administration. \nOf course, even if an American president shares a given ally's view of the world, diplomacy \ndoes not stop. The job of ambassadors, foreign ministers, and other representatives of \nforeign governments is to keep the United States on their side. Traditionally, this is done \nthrough formal discussions with U.S. officials at the State Department, National Security \nCouncil, and Department of Defense; meetings with members of Congress; writing op-eds in \ninfluential media outlets; and informal channels of influence, notably the Washington social \ncircuit of dinners, embassy garden parties, national day events and the like. No doubt there \nwas a lot of this going on through the first year and half of the Trump administration. But as \nwe now know, there was an entirely parallel effort to influence American foreign policy, and \nGeorge Nader was at the center of it. \nAccording to the New York Times, Nader and Elliott Broidy pitched a scheme to the \ngovernments of the UAE and Saudi Arabia in which Broidy would use his extensive \ncontacts in Washington, especially in the White House, to shape U.S. policy toward Qatar, \nwhich the Saudis and Emiratis accuse of supporting the Muslim Brotherhood, funding \nextremism, and cozying up to Iran. Apparently, the Emiratis agreed to the arrangement. \nClearly, putting the screws to Qatar's Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani is a high priority for \nthe crown princes of Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi, who undoubtedly would not apologize \nfor using every method and resource at their disposal to advance their countries' interests. \nWhat is the Trump administration's excuse, though? \nThe kind of influence-peddling in which Nader and Broidy were involved can be traced back \nto Jared Kushner. On Nov. 8, 2016, if not before, he was handing out his cellphone number \nto all kinds of people in Washington with little regard for the potential consequences and \napparently little idea about who was genuinely powerful and who were just posers. No doubt \nthat important people in certain countries had the mobile numbers of senior members of the \nObama administration, plus their Gmail addresses, but there was something qualitatively \ndifferent about the way Kushner was operating. He was essentially opening the door to a \nTrumpian culture in which there is no process, there is no vetting, everyone and anyone \ncould be an asset, loyalty is the greatest quality second only to money, and there are always \nways to get something done no matter what. \nTrump's world does not operate the same way as Washington's major Middle Eastern allies, \nbut there are some parallels that make stories like the George Nader affair possible. Trump's \ntendency to eschew the formal processes and procedures of government dovetails with the \nway in informal power, uncodified norms, and past practices shape governance and policy in \nplaces as diverse as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, and Israel. These kinds of informal \ninstitutions exist in the United States as well; a lot of things have gotten done in Washington \nover the years because of the Harvard \"old boys' network or because that's the way it has \nalways been done in the cloakroom. But informal networking has generally not guided the \nrealm of foreign policy, which has always involved an exhaustive (and exhausting) \ninteragency process. Kushner's willingness to hand out his digits signaled that Team Trump \nwas open to doing things significantly differently from previous administrations, and U.S. \nallies along with people like Nader and Broidy took him up on it. The result was a $650 \nmillion contract for Broidy's security firm after he bent the ear of the president and others \nabout the perfidy of the Qatari leadership. \nFrom the vantage point of Middle Eastern capitals, in Trump's Washington, the secretary of \nstate and the national security advisor are superfluous. You could go through Kushner or \nsupplement by engaging in some \"riyalpolitik.\" The influence business has been around \nWashington for a long time. The amount of money that foreign governments expend on D.C. \nlobbying is staggering, but the Nader-Broidy scheme was an attempt to sell American \nforeign policy___which, as Mueller will soon remind everyone lest anyone in Trump's orbit \nforget, is different from selling real estate. \nLike this article? Read an unlimited number of articles, plus access to our entire 47-year \nprinted archive, the FP App, and the Digital Magazine when you subscribe to FP \nPremium for just 99 cents!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Middle Eastern Monarchs Look at the Trumps and See Themselves — Foreign Policy", "body": ""}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031796.txt_19051
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031796.txt
|
Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn <i@hbrk.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/15/trump-advisors-reportedly-seeking-a-pardon-for-junk-bond-king-milken.html\n\nTrump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken\n\nTae Kim\n\nSeveral of President Donald Trump's advisors are pushing him to pardon Michael Milken, Bloomberg News reported Friday.\n\nMichael Milken, 71, was known as the \"junk bond king\" in the 1980s and was convicted for securities fraud.\n\nBloomberg said former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, senior advisor Jared Kushner and attorney Rudy Giuliani support the pardon for Milken.\n\nMilken has a net worth of $3.7 billion, according to Forbes. The financier, who pioneered the market for high-yield bonds while at Drexel Burnham Lambert, was sentenced to 10 years in prison and permanently banned from the securities industry by the Securities and Exchange Commission. His prison term was reduced to two years.\n\nThe White House and a spokesperson for the Milken Institute did not immediately respond to requests for comment.\n\nSee the full Bloomberg News report here."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "6/15/2018 1:26:04 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump advisors reportedly seeking a pardon for ‘junk bond king’ Milken", "body": "Did we get bank appraisal ayh"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022444.txt_19052
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022444.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/25/2016 2:04:49 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Remind ur friend that I designed the DJT business comeback and now he may be the President"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033339.txt_19060
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033339.txt
|
Donald Trump | Deutsche Bank | House Intelligence Committee
|
[{"sender": "David Mitchel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2019 11:08:57 AM", "subject": "Donald Trump | Deutsche Bank | House Intelligence Committee", "body": "https://therealdeal.com/2019/01/09/congress-to-investigate-trumps-florida-property-sale-deutsche-bank-loans/"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029590.txt_19062
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029590.txt
|
Re: invitation
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:30:39 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\n\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next time\nyou're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar themes to\nLolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young girl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the \"bootleg\"\nepisode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me and you were\n\nso kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028856.txt_19064
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028856.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk / reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and fiinancial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"oirls?\",, careful i will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit , clinton ,security council, holy shit im on | for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....now are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "train? yes , 1 will be like the emergency room doctor at lenox hill, put that crazy in room 1, gunshot in surgery, and the \"cook\" welll -- he can wait"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:01 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, trains exist -- people ride them to get from one place to another.....germ factories, however. DC today, back in NY on Sunday morning."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 6:57:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}]
| 9
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029277.txt_19067
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029277.txt
|
Re: Trump
|
[{"sender": "LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Jeff\nHow plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>"], "timestamp": "On Oct 2, 2016, at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "can somoene from the development office show rothschild around harvard sat.?"}, {"sender": "LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "On Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes. Let's briefly discuss. Can u have her write me."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>"], "timestamp": "Oct 2, 2016, at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes"}, {"sender": "LHS <lhs@lawrencesummers.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "On Sunday, 2 October 2016", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "What number r u at?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 9:00:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": ""}]
| 6
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032389.txt_19068
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032389.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 5:29:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yikes your birthday coming up next month"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/7/2016 12:25:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time", "subject": "Re:", "body": "plenty left"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi jeffrey hope all is well I think you are going to have a winderful life from now on in your opinion how much is left in this market it's been a trump triumph I gave him some money through woody best jonathan"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033097.txt_19069
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033097.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Paul Barrett", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 11:11:16 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Im not angry, sorry, it is sad. it is apparent that you have no experience trading. we both made a \nmistake. . the spy trades were the results of a rank amatuer. . you took a postion on the direction of the \nmarket. ok. you decided to play it extra short time and short. . why? becaue the options are cheaper. \n? knowing full well that time premium was running. . first silly move. . I allowed as promised to give you \nauthority. . you set a target. . it hit the traget, you moved in back. based on media reporting on trump \nvisit? you didnt act. the market dipped and you panicked. . AMATEUR. wrong options wrong timing, \nno discipline and as a percentaage of investment, a one day dip fof 25%. wanting to buy the highter strike , is \nok. but why the same month? why the same moment. why the same index. . sorry. I have taught this for \nmany years. and your grade is an F. not one good move in many. . re broadcom. the crack happend in \nthe morning, options were higher. no alternative presented. no analysis. , this is no way to manage \nmoney. I have lost a great deal of money hoping you would be able to do as you promised you could . would. \n. Had you told me, jeffrey I d like to try a new job as a manager lets start slow I can learn. i would be \nless annoyed. you told me you had great confidence knew the risks and truly believed you would be able to \nraise money .do well and prosper. . If it were not you, this would have ended months ago. . we should \nwork on a solution. not sure yet what shape it takes."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032999.txt_19073
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032999.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Walker, MD Po"], "timestamp": "5/17/2017 8:07:22 AM", "subject": null, "body": "told you http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/15/trum\n-ex pands-ban-on-abortion-funding-overseas.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt_19076
|
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt
|
Re: Your Special Day
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "pretty well"}, {"sender": "David Grosof [~ 0]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "Probability as a force rather than a what?\n\nDidn't suss out the next word...\n\nWatson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk ~4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?\n\nDz"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "Jan 20, 2017 4:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers. _centrifigal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity. lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would . could be a force similar to the EM one."}, {"sender": "David Grosof [i]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "http://xked.com/123/ can't resist!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["David Grosof"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 12:32:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Your Special Day", "body": "yes , now assume that there i a balancing force. and gravity is merely the result of paticles being pushed together . etc"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032741.txt_19077
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032741.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am | seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Tonight or tomnight"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "either 73 am or 10 pm"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reif", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 3:33:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jesus....see you at 730...will be eager to hear about your day today..."}]
| 7
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022322.txt_19079
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022322.txt
|
Fw: Weekend Snippets [C]
|
[{"sender": "Paul Morris", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/21/2013 12:44:26 AM", "subject": "Fw: Weekend Snippets [C]", "body": "Vinit is working with me on some large clients now, good resource, I will introduce you to him and few other sr. folks before year end either in NYC or in europe, just some directional thoughts/observations not necessarily for you,"}, {"sender": "Vinit Sahni", "recipients": ["Vinit Sahni"], "timestamp": "10/20/2013 07:05 PM GDT", "subject": "Weekend Snippets (internal only) [I]", "body": "Here we are -> record highs for the S&P 500, the S&P 400 Midcaps, and small cap Russell 2000. Should we be asking ourselves if this is the Terminal Phase or will this continue ? In these snippets here is a quick mark to market on where we are and some of the trades below. The theme of the trades below is very clear, carry outperformance and lower vol. Vol has broken down and we are on the leg down to 2009 levels (includes FX vol, rates vol, commodity vol etc) -> this has prompted additional risk taking and technicians for example are calling for 1775 levels in the S&P -> sharpe ratios of high carry trades looks very compelling here Mark to Market: With the US government reopened / debt ceiling raised, Obama stated -> there were \"no winners.\" It's been only about 3 weeks, but the fourth quarter has already shown itself worthy of the history books. If the spec community can hold gains through year-end (the vol markets are alluding to) -> the ranks of billionaires will surely inflate further. No winners, right ? This week saw the S&P500, the S&P 400 Mid-Cap Index and the small cap Russell 2000 all trade to record highs. The week's 2.8% advance increased the small caps' year-to-date gain to 31.3%. Google added about 140 points and $38.5bn of market cap this week (to $338bn) to reach an all-time high (up 43% y-t-d). The more speculative \"beta\" stocks continue to outperform. The NASDAQ 100 (up 3.7% this week), Morgan Stanley High Tech Index (up 2.6%) and The Interactive Week Internet Index (3.4%) all traded to the highest levels since 2000. Treasury, MBS, and corporate debt prices were higher as well. It all adds up. The QE-enhanced 2013 version of \"how crazy do things get?\" is outshining even the 1999 speculative melee, yeah!!. The (post-LTCM bailout) year 1999 saw the small cap Russell 2000 Index jump from 422 to 505 (19.7%). This year, it has already run from 849 to 1,114 (up 31.3%). The S&P400 Midcap Index jumped from 392 to 445 in 1999 (13.5%). With more than two months to go, so far it's 1,020 to 1,290 for the midcaps (up 26.5%). Why stop just at the US. Germany's DAX equities index added 1.6% this week to a new all-time high (up 16.5% y-t-d). Italian stocks jumped 2.1% (up 18.4% y-t-d) and Spanish stocks surged 3.5% (up 22.5%), both to more than two-year highs. Australian stocks gained 1.7% (up 14.5% y-t-d). Despite major economic issues, India's stock market jumped 1.7% this week to within a couple percent of new highs. Stocks jumped 4.2% in Brazil and 4.3% in Argentina. Indonesian stocks rallied 4.5%. Around the globe, most equities markets pushed higher. Fueled by huge ETF flows, total equity mutual fund inflows this past week jumped to a whopping $12.7bn. You may want to see this -> On a weekly basis, global central bank International Reserve Assets (data from Bloomberg). This data provide a decent proxy for global financial flows, especially to the emerging markets (EM). From $6.63 TN back in April of 2009, International Reserves surged this week to a record $11.415 TN. Reserves have inflated 330% in ten years. Lets focus on some trades here: 1) This environment is supportive for carry trades, which has been reflected in the outperformance of high yielders following the announcement of the US debt deal. Long AUD/USD: Longer term investors remain relatively short AUD, which suggests that AUDUSD strength has further to run. A move above parity is unlikely as the RBA should step in. Therefore buy 2m 0.9750 call against selling 2x 0.9900 calls. The AUDUSD risk reversal looks cheap (calls expensive relative to puts). This suggests selling high-strike calls, either outright for those that do not expect further AUD appreciation or to finance a low-strike call for a short-term carry position. Long KRW NDF : this trade will benefit should CNY appreciation or band widening expectations gain additional traction Long USD TRY: the market remains relatively short TRY, and with risk premium in USDTRY declining the most among major currencies, these short positions are likely to be at risk from carry traders. 2) HY vs IG compression trade in Europe: Six weeks of retail outflows from high-grade funds but retail inflows into high-yield funds shows that the compression trade in credit is firmly entrenched in Europe. There is a structural reach for yield and this trade still has some legs. I would however hedge out rate risk and stick with spread risk. I will point out that more than $200bn of \"cov-lite\" loans have been issued so far this year, more than double the $100bn sold in 2007. The record issuance means that about 56 per cent of new leveraged loans are now cov-lite !! 3) Long Europe small caps: This is a leveraged trade to a European recovery. European small + mid caps have a higher potential for upside. As European economies improve and small to mid cap valuations in the region continue to look attractive, a re-acceleration of sales and earnings at these companies should drive better performance in European small to mid caps versus the US. Investors looking for yield will find higher levels in Europe versus the US with European small to mid caps yielding near 3% versus approximately 1.4% in the US. 4) Long IT stocks: overall IT spend is expected to grow 0.9% in 2014 compared to —0.7% growth. Corporate spending sentiment now is on the uptick prompting this move. Also keep an eye on data center growth. Demand for data center services is due to, First, technological evolution -> driving up computing density (servers) and utilization rates (virtualization), therefore data center space must constantly evolve to meet power and cooling needs. Second, increased cost consciousness and core competency focus -> driving greater acceptance of data center outsourcing within Enterprise IT departments. 5) Long Italian Banks / Italian Govvies: another leveraged play on the European periphery recovery. Unicredit clearly stands out. UCG will definitely gain from the European banking union theme. There has been recent talk of this year / early 2014 as a point when impaired loan growth may finally subside and I expect a wide range of cost cutting action. Our strategists think \"Italy looks attractive in a twin deficits framework and should benefit from improving fiscal and credit impasse, political risk premium should decline\", therefore they recommend buying lOy Italy vs Germany at 230bps, targetting a spread at 200bps 6) Euro Inflation floors: In the euro inflation options market, 5y 0% inflation floor prices are close to their lows. This is not consistent with the 5y inflation swap rates which are by themselves close to lows -> meaning deflation is closer-to-the-money. Inflation volatility has collapsed, probably mostly for purely technical reasons as is all other vol !!. Deflation is not anyone's central case, but a \"underpriced tail risk\". This creates opportunity for those prepared to pay premium for this risk and therefore would recommend buying the charted 5y 0% zero coupon floors at or around the current level of 20c. 7) KOSPI Calls: The KOSPI2 has been trading within a tight range, realizing only 9.8% over the past 30 days, the lowest globally. Low realized vol has capped short-dated implied vol, driving lm ATM vol to 12.8%, near all time lows. The Index broke out from a tight range last week and investors should consider buying short-dated calls for upside exposure or replace outright longs with calls. The differential between positioning in EM equities and European equities has reached an extreme — worst on record and 2.4 stdev below its 10-year average. Even the NKY 3M ATM vol dropped to an 8-month low !!! 8) UK Banks: On the back of weak FICC earnings across the street, Barclays I feel has hit Rock Bottom. This reflects the sentiment around FICC geared investment banks generally, but also the horrible six months that management has seen. My personal view is that rates + credit will recover in 2014 as tapering will create a steeper curve and volatility. I also think Barclays leverage ratios will improve soon and Barclays will push through an aggressive cost cutting plan. Quick Macro Snippet: What should we be focused on: The most important market drivers will now be the 1) US labor market data and 2) Eurozone inflation. An improvement in the former will determine the timing and pace of Fed tapering. A decline in the latter will determine whether the ECB will stay on hold, or loosen policies. The Sep NFP is on Tuesday stay focused. Gold some technicals - couldn't resist: The bears are still fighting the recent up move, here are some technicals to rebase... The volatility in gold over the past several days has been impressive. A close above 1330 (Oct-08 high) would be the first sign of basing and a turn higher, while bulls gain control only AFTER a close above 1375 (Sep-19 high). A close below 1270 exposes the Jun-13, bear trend lows of 1180"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021091.txt_19080
|
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021091.txt
|
Re: Daily Beast
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Peter Green"], "timestamp": "03 April 2011 12:36", "subject": "Re: Daily Beast", "body": "cant open anything that is not underlined in blue sorry Peter iam not good at computer stuff.When are you coming here soican call Catherine Crier please nothing to maryanne about thsi jonathan"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032972.txt_19081
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032972.txt
|
Re: A few favors...
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff <qT@...>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT\ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I\nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and\nthat I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy\nRuemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures.\n\nAre you in NYC soon?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "can you send me an email to forward to tom. hes in the middle 0 some of the mess at the\nmoment. everyone lawyering up in wash."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "When in NYC?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:52:46 PM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "today only"}]
| 4
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021818.txt_19082
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021818.txt
|
Re: we'll see
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "notable?"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Definitely not gonna talk to the reporers. It doesn't feel right, Xoxoxo They called my friencMtoday and told her they are writing a story about notable people from the east and would like to talk to her about me. She didn't fall for it.. Slovakian press is going crazy now."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "It was a first draft"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I know, I like where it's going.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 2:18 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "Normally it's the copilots job to call out M, in this instance I'm calling her out)):"}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I'm a pilot...I prefer sex slave to copilot ;)"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [""], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "it was only meant as a pun on."}, {"sender": "", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 9, 2015 8:50 PM", "subject": "Re: we'll see", "body": "I know, cute„ just a joke about people's unique sensitivities. You must have heard many this week. How are You doing?"}]
| 8
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030915.txt_19086
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030915.txt
|
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
|
[{"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily east?", "body": "Dear Professor Krauss,\n\nWe met briefly after your talk in Ithaca a few months ago — I'm the girl on The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe podcast. I've really enjoyed your talks and books, but I was surprised to see you quoted in the Daily Beast recently defending Jeffrey Epstein:\n\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-\nepsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/\n\nCan you confirm if the following quote is accurate?\n\n\"If anything, the unfortunate period he suffered has caused him to really think about what he wants to do \nwith his money and his time, and support knowledge,\" says Krauss. \"Jeffrey has surrounded himself with \nbeautiful women and young women but they're not as young as the ones that were claimed. As a scientist I \nalways judge things on empirical evidence and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I've \nnever seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would \nbelieve him over other people.\" Though colleagues have criticized him over his relationship with Epstein, \nKrauss insists, \"I don't feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.\"\n\nThanks,\nRebecca Watson"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 at 12:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "yes it is.. Based on my direct experience with Jeffrey, which is all I can base my assessment on, he is a \nthoughtful, kind, considerate man who is generous to his friends, and all of the women I have known who \nhave been associated with Jeffrey speak glowingly in the same words..\n\nwhy are you asking?"}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 9:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Thanks for getting back to me. I was asking because I found the quote shocking . . . the evidence against \nEpstein is overwhelming and he's even pled guilty to paying for sex with a minor. It's in no way scientific or \nrational to assume that because you never saw him with an underage girl he must actually be innocent. It is \npossible for a person to be kind and generous with his friends but still a criminal paying for sex with \nunderage girls in his private life.\n\nI'm going to write about the topic on Skepchick, and I'll include any additional statement you'd like if you \nwant to provide more context or if you've changed your mind.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "jeffrey apparently paid for massages with sex... I believe him when he told me he had no idea the girls were \nunderage, and I doubt that people normally are asked for or present a driver's license under such \ncircumstances... Moreover, I also believe that Jeffrey is an easy target for those who want to take advantage \nof him... Moreover, I can say with great honesty that Jeffrey's time in prison led him to seriously examine \nhis life in very positive ways and I don't believe in blanket condemnations of people. He served time for \nsomething that was determined was inappropriate. I honestly don't know who was the victim in this case. I \nfully expect that these masseuses knew what they were doing, and were not swayed to do anything with \nJeffrey that they were not already doing. That is not to approve of the whole behavior, but lots of peopleI \nknow and like have behavior I don't entirely approve of. I know it is not politically correct to say that, \nbecause in general this is a very sensitive issue and all other things being equal one should take the side of \nthe young women. But all things are not equal in this case, from my point of view. It is a judgement call, \nand I will not turn my back on a good friend so easily."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011 at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, thanks for this statement . . . I'll print it in full along with the article, probably today. I very, very \nstrongly disagree with your position and hope you eventually reconsider, but I do appreciate you taking the \ntime to respond.\n\n-R"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Rebecca Watson"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "ok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here.. \nand there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution \nor consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily east?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt... haven't heard from \nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what. \n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?\n\nLawrence Krauss"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:56 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "4/7/2011 2:05:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "PS. I have decided that Feynman would have done what I did.. and I am therefore content.. no matter what.. :)"}]
| 12
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032362.txt_19087
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032362.txt
|
My sister's perspective from Europe
|
[{"sender": "Linda Stone", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/13/2016 6:26:33 PM", "subject": "My sister's perspective from Europe", "body": "am looking at this from over here in Germany. American politics gets reduced in the end to only a few \nissues: pro-life or pro-choice, gun laws, and establishment vs. anti-establishment. Political categories \nare so wishy washy and intermingled with what is termed 'liberal' and 'conservative' that one forgets \nwhat they actually mean. \nof course, not everybody who voted for Trump is sexist or a racist, but, on some level, they didn't care \nif he is. He knew how to gather momentum with the discourse he chose, and, even if he changes his tone, \nhe has let loose a storm. We will brace ourselves over here for Putin's eventual takeover of the Baltic \nStates. Putin has extended his power back into Republic of Georgia, the Crimea, and Armenia. Trump has \nsaid that he would not come to the aid of Nato allies if they were attacked. Is is the least of our \nproblems here in Germany; Erdogan is a much larger threat, for now. \nddon't see Hillary Clinton as being at fault. I see the growth of nationalism (all throughout the world, \nnot just in the USA) and an underestimation of the fear that non-Hispanic whites have about the \ntrajectory they are on to become a minority (in the USA and other European countries). \nEvery news show, talk show, etc here is discussing and analysing the fallout of Trump's win. German \npoliticians are hoping to learn from it, to stem the growth of the right wing AFD party here. As far as \nknow, Merkel is the only leader who congratulated Trump with a warning."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032404.txt_19089
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032404.txt
|
Re: Chatter
|
[{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/1/2017 12:44:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Chatter", "body": "when you bring a donkey to the Kentucky derby you won't get into the starting gate and you certainly won't cross the finish line. This donkey brought four racehorses who will get to the finish line! This was my major role hopefully we have a way forward."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 31, 2016, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Chatter", "body": "Fun?"}, {"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Chatter", "body": "FYI you were right. Happy New Year."}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032274.txt_19090
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032274.txt
|
Republican convention speakers Donald Trump
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:27 AM", "subject": "Republican convention speakers Donald Trump", "body": "http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/us/politics/republican-convention-speakers-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/14/2016 11:59:52 AM", "subject": "Republican convention speakers Donald Trump", "body": "funny you sent as 1 just read and saw Peter Thiel speaking\niam hoping he will have some surprises as well.\n\npolls getting closer..\n\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton CBS News/NY Times\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. Clinton Economist/Y ouGov\n\nClinton 40, Trump 40 Tie\nClinton 45, Trump 43 Clinton +2"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033068.txt_19109
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033068.txt
|
Re: no chile
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss1@asu.edu>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "have cancelled my flight to chile.. did so while on way to jfk and found a flight to portland at the same time.. will be home tonight.. can we talk tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss1@asu.edu>"], "timestamp": "Jan 14, 2018, at 3:33 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "why?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss1@asu.edu>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:36 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "so.. what do you think of the letter on the whole? This is very scary, but I see that they keep contacting students, postdocs etc, and are not letting up.. I really need your feedback. will talk tomorrow.. on plane now."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss <lkrauss1@asu.edu>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:52 PM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "Of course"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "1/15/2018 2:57:30 AM", "subject": "Re: no chile", "body": "He publicly shed and defend ed his told in publishing trash. Right to know I think you should distinguish yourself from trump"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032376.txt_19112
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032376.txt
|
ILE MOUSTIQUE
|
[{"sender": "Linda Pinto", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/25/2016 11:53:06 AM", "subject": "RE: ILE MOUSTIQUE", "body": "OK great I will ask the accounting department to prepare and send the first request. \nGood luck with the government..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Linda PINTO"], "timestamp": "jeudi 24 novembre 2016 18:09", "subject": "Re: ILE MOUSTIQUE", "body": "please do so. I am having a meeting with the government on the 15th re foreigb workers , painters. etc. sorry \n, its beeen crazy with trump people here in palm beach"}, {"sender": "Linda Pinto", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:49 AM", "subject": "Re: ILE MOUSTIQUE", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nSince your last meeting in Paris and the meeting on site I have had no news from you. I would \njust like to know if you intend to go ahead with the interior design work because Florence is \nblocked and waiting. If you want to do it and since about —70-80-90% of the project is \napproved then why don't we start with what is sure and for the remaining points, such as the \nkitchen, we can see about these the next time you are in Paris. \nAs for the kitchen I understand new samples were sent yesterday. These samples are in grey \nwhich is not a very bright color for a beach house kitchen where perhaps blue might be more \nappropriate. Let's see. \nIf you would like us to do the project we will send you a budget recap for the points agreed \nupon along with our first account and fees. \nBig kisses,"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029288.txt_19113
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029288.txt
|
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "Your pal should stay out of press. \nPublic link to manafort will be a disaster. \nThis is a staggering shit show."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lawrence Summers"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 2:50:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric", "body": "saudi?"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029209.txt_19114
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029209.txt
|
Re: Reminder Ed Boyden.
|
[{"sender": "Ed Boyden <a>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "July 14, 2014, 4:50:47 AM EDT", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas,\n\nthe perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my\n\nschedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is\nrunning strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so\n\nthat is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now\nmuch more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities\nlaunching...\n\nBest,\nEd"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Neil Gershenfeld"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Reminder Ed Boyden.", "body": "Good morning Neil...I am afraid Jeffrey must cancel his trip up today...he is sick in bed and not well. Iam so\nvery sorry to do this last minute. Hopefully we can circle back to this soon.\n\nThank you,\nLesley\nAssistant to Jeffrey Epstein"}, {"sender": "Neil Gershenfeld", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 6, 2013, at 12:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Reminder Ed Boyden.", "body": "Confirming lunch noon Friday at my office, E15-401. Sunglasses and beach balls optional, hopefully this will\nbe a warm-up for meeting in more entertaining venues."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 17, 2014", "subject": "Reminder: Would you like me to set up a call for you with Ed Boyden?", "body": "Reminder: Would you like me to set up a call for you with Ed Boyden?\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "7/17/2014 1:47:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Reminder Ed Boyden.", "body": "Today or tomorowb"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029221.txt_19123
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029221.txt
|
Re: writing up proposal
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa Ne"], "timestamp": "10/27/2014 3:53:38 PM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "I think the proposal for 500k is optimistic but can't hurt."}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: writing up proposal", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nLarry has told me that you and a friend would like to contribute to my project (hallelujah and thank you a million times, Jeffrey) and that I ought to write up a proposal asking for 500,000. This is wonderful. If this comes to pass, the best way for that money to come, I think, is as a gift to Poetry in America, an initiative at EdLabs at Harvard University. This will give me discretion over its disbursement to HarvardX and WGBH, but this will be absolutely be a Harvard gift that will count as Campaign success and from which Harvard will take some (but not as much)overhead. . So far the best finance people I've met are at EdLabs and they are happy to manage these funds for me. There are other ways to give me this money that leave Harvard out, but my understanding is that your friend would like this to be a Harvard gift.\n\nHere's a draft of what I'd like to do with that money.\n\nI'd like 500,000 to do post-production and distribution of a whole historical period of American poetry (1914-1945 is what I'm thinking--Modernism) and including three episodes of tv.\n\nThe raw materials for that period include interviews with Bill Clinton (including footage not yet used by WGBB), Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen (whose lawyers didn't like our release a while ago, but we're hoping will soften over time), Harrison Ford (still a maybe), Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Al Filreis, Rafael Campo, Susan Howe, kids from Nantucket High School, kids from Brookline High School, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, Ray Dalio, Leon Wieseltier, Richard Dawkins and others; and footage shot in Harlem, Greenwich Village, midtown, Chicago, London (if I have the money to hire a crew there; don't now ), at museums including the Fogg, Harvard Museum of Natural History, Frost's house in Ripton Vermont and more.\n\nThis allows the donor to give to a big Harvard Campaign priority, Teaching and Learning , by supporting Poetry in America, allowing me to produce the crucial segment of the online course with the highest (TV quality) production values and so also supplying higher quality video to WGBH as a way also to cut their costs.\n\nCurrently, HarvardX skimps (on lighting, for instance--see the Bill Clinton interview) and while WGBH ladles money raised by others into everything. I have been pounding away at my friends at WGBH and I know that WGBH producer will work with HarvardX if they can give him footage of the right quality. . That is, we'll use HarvardX as the backlot for WGBH so as to squeeze three episodes out for 250.\n\nThis proposal does not include experiments in schools or the curricular development into courses for teachers that you've seen in other (million dollar_) proposals. But the courses for teachers can't happen before the footage is developed, and these courses will have as their centerpiece the WGBH episodes, and so this funding will make all the rest possible.\n\nI can polish this narrative and or edit it, if there are things you think I have wrong."}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026193.txt_19124
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026193.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hey shiek i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you bussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<MMIIIIMIM>"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 11:36 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in florida,"}, {"sender": "<MMIIIIMIM>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night. ."}, {"sender": "- MMIIMIM", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait \nwill write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, at 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today.. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday i m travelling back to europe tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["< >"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 8:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If you think wise I could come to New York sunday evening and also leave tues"}, {"sender": "< >", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt understand what you mean? do you want me to stay? or you want to see my boss?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sep 24, 2017, at 1:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why are you up so early.? you need rest. - ! , I wanted you to know that If you think I should meet your boss in New York , where there is less pomp I can do so. / are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 10:31:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i didnt get a good rest this month.. i think it is better to meet him in kuwait .. man do you love cuba that much° \nwhenever you want .. november or before .. just send me an email and i will take care of your visit"}]
| 16
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032796.txt_19126
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032796.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [RR vote]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "david pecker ? what happends to him"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [RR vote]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 6:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Big trouble"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "does he flip"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [a", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/21/2018 11:32:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of course"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033488.txt_19128
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033488.txt
|
Beoing update
|
[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/26/2011 4:34:41 PM", "subject": "Beoing update", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nBoeing status:\n\nBoeing will be completed May 6th,.\n-re weigh\n\n-three mandatory AD compliance\n\n-FDR Flight Data recorder repair,.\n\n-leak in flap drive gear box,.\n\nC5 check will be accomplished July 30th,.\nThe maintenance facility is completing \"Trumps\" New Boeing 757 at this time here,. Eric Roth is doing the interior,. | was\ntold Trump sold his B727 to a person in Singapore??\n\nthx,\nLarry"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031999.txt_19129
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031999.txt
|
Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Sicgal"], "timestamp": "Mon Jan 11 19:28:25 2010", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. 1 want to hear more about the trip"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it.\n\nxoxo Peggy\n\nHD: Wall Street, Take Two"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:17 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Will call you later. Iam sick as a dog with a cold. I am supposed to go to Dr. Magnani this morning for a cleaning. If you get a\ncleaning with a cold does it make it worse of just infect the dental hygenist?\n\nHad a great lunch for Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster for \"The Messenger\" at Monkey Bar yesterday and hung with Clooney at the\nNew York Film Critics Awards last night. Tonight is the National Board of Review and I am thinking of staying in bed till show\ntime. Have a party for Clooney Wednesday nigh Graydon is hosting at Monkey Bar that we are working on.\n\nT have to fly to LA Jan. 14 and I am worried...I have emailed three doctors this morning!\nWill call later...Mattie keeps saying she is going to show me how to email photos- will try to do today and call.\n\nI think I got sick in economy class from Lamu, Nairobi, Amsterdan, Newark from all those wanna be terrorists breathing on me in\nthe planes.\n\nDid you see \"Avator\". I do not have a dvd because it's 3D.\n\nThe white American marines are wiped out by black people painted blue....it's going to be highest grossing film in the world is an\nfew weeks beating out \"Titanic\" and will win the Oscar for \"Best Picture.\"\n\nxoxo Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Sicga"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 11:18:58 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "sorry you are sick, go slow.. no cleaning. stay in bed.. sorry.."}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026787.txt_19133
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026787.txt
|
Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmeler", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/24/2018 3:36:08 AM", "subject": "Lawyer for Susan Rice: Obama administration ‘justifiably concerned’ about sharing intel with Trump team - POLITICO", "body": "https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classified-intelligence-michael-flynn-trump-423437\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026787"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029547.txt_19139
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029547.txt
|
Re: boosting strategy
|
[{"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler,\nOk thanks so much for the review. I've cc'd Jeffrey. I'll be in touch this afternoon.\n\nChristina Galbraith"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "February 7, 2014 at 10:33:16 AM EST", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "We are pushing up the highest authority domains available for \"Jeffrey Epstein\" in general. I had reserved the\napproach of pushing non-website URLs for a few months because you expressed concern with making sure\nour URLs are on first page... but I had call w/ Mr. Epstein in the beginning of January and expressed that is a\nlimiting factor for moving Forbes/NYPost as quickly as we'd like.\n\nGetting up different types of results for different folks is required to dislodge the negative placements. Once\nthey are dislodged it is much easier to restore our websites back to the rankings and have our \"ideal\" first\npage. The reason for this is Google tracks click data on results and as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second\npage they will begin a slow death (less clicks on those, more clicks on the ones we have on first page)\n\nFrom there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we\ncan provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over. Using the\n\"short-term\" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war... You saw how Google was\nchanging up much more dramatically when we had multiple Epstein's on the first page vs. having a saturated\nfirst page.\n\nI feel like time was lost focusing on making sure it was Mr. Epstein properties when he has giving explicit\npermission to promote any URL required to dislodge the negatives.\n\nI hope this makes sense.. I haven't heard from Rich on the last invoice I sent (1/29/14) and am hoping all is\nwell. Do you know if he's out of the office ?"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler,\nIm at a Kinko's.\n\nI see that you're boosting non-website url's -- are you sure this is the right approach? (vs. boosting Jeffrey's sites?) the\n.org and foundation sites are slipping down and the USVI and science are permanently off the first page.\n\nThanks for you input.\n\nChristina"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032248.txt_19141
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032248.txt
|
Re: Patterson
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about:\n\nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.\n\nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps some social media efforts.\n\nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort.\n\nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and Connolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that Patterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered before.\n\nMeanwhile--"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 18, 2016, at 11:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:57:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Patterson", "body": "On the shuttle back to NYC. About to take off."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030097.txt_19145
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030097.txt
|
Re: Kenya
|
[{"sender": "Peggy Siegal <peggysiegal@example.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 3:24 AM", "subject": "Re: Kenya", "body": "We are sitting in the Amsterdam airport about to take off for Nair. Headed to Cottar's Camp in the Masai Mara....got Mattie in tow... she is dressed as a runaway in ripped jeans and a hoodie and sits on the floor of every airport repacking her knapsack. She is now passed out, like the homeless. Will take photos and send.\n\nWe are going to photograph ourselves with the Masai in the mud huts and say we crashed the winter White house and are posing with Obama's relatives. Miss you. Keep you posted.\n\nDid you see Sarah, the D on tv or speak to her?\n\nxoxo Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "12/19/2009 8:25:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kenya", "body": "you will be amazed by the aroma"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029553.txt_19146
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029553.txt
|
Re: Keating Interview
|
[{"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/28/2011 4:33:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Yes. Just arrived back from San Fran."}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 28, 2011, at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Are you here\n\nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 28, 2011, at 12:36 AM", "subject": "Re: Keating Interview", "body": "Paul Keating explains as never before\n\ne BY:PAUL KELLY, EDITOR-AT-LARGE\n° From:The Australian\ne October 22, 2011 12:00AM\n\nhttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/paul-keating-explains-as-never-before/story-e6frg6z6-\n12261734930298&ct=ga&cad=CAcQAhgAIAAoATAAOABAKPKISQRIAVAAWABIBWVULVVT&cd=JW80AO0ivU\nQM&usg=AFQiCNHdOmUbAjc-Z2liiig3_exEbZmRt2w"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030002.txt_19149
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030002.txt
|
Re: ICYMI
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Reid Hoffman"], "timestamp": "7/5/2015 9:30:29 PM", "subject": "Re: ICYMI", "body": "heyy it looks like your diet program has worked"}, {"sender": "Reid Hoffman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:03 AM", "subject": "ICYMI", "body": "ICYMI\n\nMy occasional roundup of interesting links and\nwriting I've shared — in case you missed them. :)\n\nNew and Notable\n\n° We are thrilled to welcome Sarah Tavel to Greylock\nPartners. LINK\n\ne And also very excited to welcome lynda.com to the\nLinkedIn team! LINK\n\ne Change.org celebrates its 100 million users\nmilestone. Emily Chang discuss this and more with CEO\n\nBen Rattray on Bloomberg West: LINK\n\ne Byron Auguste launched Opportunity@Work, a new\ncivic enterprise aimed at \"rewiring the U.S. labor market.\"\n\nTom Friedman's post: LINK\n\n° Mimi Ito launched Connected Camps, a summer\n\nonline coding camp using Minecraft. LINK\nWorthwhile Reads\n\ne Jeff Weiner: How LinkedIn is Helping Power the\nPresident's Tech Jobs Initiative LINK\n\ne The New Yorker: R U There? - Nancy Lublin and\nCrisis Text Line LINK\n\n° Fast Company: Inside Obama's Stealth Startup LINK\n\n° Jerry Chen: The Age of Developer-Defined\n\nInfrastructure LINK"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032782.txt_19158
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032782.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 17, 2018, at 7:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my email is full with similar comments . wow\nIm sure his view is that it went super well . he thinks he has charmed his adversary... Admittedly he has no\nidea of the symbolism . He has no idea of most things"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:01:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will call later. What number?"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029235.txt_19161
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029235.txt
|
an article you may both hate. or like.
|
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nLawrence\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}, {"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major\n\nhuman disasters.\n\nOn Davis, | frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment\nrequire (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019211.txt_19162
|
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019211.txt
|
Chatter
|
[{"sender": "Bruce Moskowitz [is", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/31/2016 11:57:08 PM", "subject": "Chatter", "body": "FYI you were right. Happy New Year."}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031174.txt_19163
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031174.txt
|
Re: Larry Summers
|
[{"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Mr. Epstein: \nI work for Larry Summers and as you may have heard, we are stranded in St. Thomas \nand the airlines are saying we can't get out until Thursday. \nOur names: \nKelly Friendly \nAndrew Friendly \nMy cell is below or you can reach my husband Andrew Friendly on his cell at \nYou may have met him when he was President Clinton's aide. \nWe would be so grateful for any help you could provide."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "my friend andrew farkas has a pretty full plane to ny tomorrwo but can take 1 or 2 of \nyou. i can call other hotels wher we have pull.. my cars and drivers are at your \ndisposal."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Fantastic. If possible, could my daughter and I go back with Mr. \nFarkas? \nPlease let me know how best to follow up. We may have found a condo by red hook but \nhaven't found a car yet. \nLet me know how to follow up."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "________________________ . andrew farkas is flying tomorrow. please contact him directly \nand as soon as you are ready i will organize the use of my car."}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Excellent. I will email him now. \nIf it's not too much of an inconvenience we would love to use the car. Is it available around 3? \nWe are staying by the airport...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "jermaine, please organzie kelly to have use of the mini van. today"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Thank you! We are so grateful...."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kelly Friendly"], "timestamp": "On Jan 4, 2014, at 12:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "you will get a call from either jermain, or cecile ( the governors wife and my asst )"}, {"sender": "Kelly Friendly", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, January 4 2014 06:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Larry Summers", "body": "Ann brought us the car. It's wonderful, thank you so much. \nWe are so grateful for your generosity..."}]
| 9
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029962.txt_19166
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029962.txt
|
Re: | beat Bush
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["eee"], "timestamp": "2/3/2016 1:22:56 PM", "subject": "Re: | beat Bush", "body": "Great"}, {"sender": "iS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, 3 February 2016", "subject": "Re: | beat Bush", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nI got more votes than Jeb Bush got in Iowa, and I only had one congressional district, he had four!! It’s so\nfunny (to me — totally embarrassing to him)!!! Still like Trump and might be a delegate to the republican\n\nconvention.\n\nWas in St. Thomas for a couple of days — did call this island, but never heard back. Went scuba diving off St.\nJeff and it was beautiful. Would be totally funny (to me at least) if you put a big fake shark or statute under the\n\nwater where the divers go....\n\nLove ya,"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025101.txt_19174
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025101.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:35 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "im in wed, fri. edelman?"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:37 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Will check"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "barrack and the boys in pb, wild wild."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Read an interesting article on why Comey screwed Clinton. Came from Israeli press.\n1. Comey as DA is hunting down Marc Rich to indict him.\n2. Ehud calls Clinton and says please pardon Marc Rich he has done work for Mossad that has been valuable.\n3. Clinton pardons Rich and Comey has been pissed ever since.\n4. Comey got his opening to get even.\nNo idea if this is accurate story.\ntjp"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016 12:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "comey knows that denise neeed to pledge 500k to foundation"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 6:47:56 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Cash or in-kind services?"}]
| 6
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027102.txt_19178
|
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027102.txt
|
prep for dinner, israel pres briefing /
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/11/2013 5:45:09 PM", "subject": "prep for dinner, israel pres briefing /", "body": "The Wall Street Journal\n\nThe Ayatollah Always Says No\n\nEditorial\n\nFebruary 8, 2013 -The Farsi word for \"no\" is na h, which is easy enough\nto remember. Maybe even Joe Biden won't forget it the next time the U.S.\ntries to reach out diplomatically to Iran.\n\nWe're speaking of the Administration's latest effort to come to terms with\nTehran over its nuclear programs, which Mr. Biden made last weekend at\nthe Munich Security Conference. The U.S. offer of direct bilateral talks,\nhe said, \"stands, but it must be real and tangible.\" Iranian foreign minister\nAli Akbar Salehi, who was also at the conference though he refused to\nmeet with U.S. officials, called Mr. Biden's comments \"a step forward.\"\n\nMr. Salehi's remark set the usual hearts aflutter that Iran is finally serious\nabout a deal. But the optimism was brief. On Thursday, Iran's Supreme\nLeader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei flatly rejected direct talks with the U.S.\n\"The U.S. is pointing a gun at Iran and wants us to talk to them,\" he said.\n\"Direct talks will not solve any problems.\"\n\nThis isn't the first time Mr. Khamenei has played chaste Daphne to\nPresident Obama's infatuated Apollo. Just after becoming President in\n2009, Mr. Obama sent the Ayatollah two private letters and delivered a\nconciliatory speech for the Persian new year of Nowruz. Mr. Khamenei's\nanswer: \"They chant the slogan of change but no change is seen in\npractice.\" He told a crowd chanting \"death to America\" that \"if a hand is\nstretched covered with a velvet glove but it is cast iron inside, that makes\nno sense.\"\n\nThat was in March 2009. In October of that year the U.S. and its allies\ntentatively worked out a deal with Iranian negotiators to move some of"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031612.txt_19188
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031612.txt
|
Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tom Barrack Private"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:34:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "nuts but i thought you guys should know"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg <IMIMI>", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Reporter said 1994 claim fed ct California\nWill go to press in several hrs"}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["'Martin G. Weinberg'"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number i\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\nThomson Reuters"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023202.txt_19202
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023202.txt
|
Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA
|
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nAs you probably know, Woody Allen's legal team said that we couldn't use the film we shot of him: online, \nfor broadcast, anywhere. \nIt was a fantastic experience taping with him and so, even if I can't ever use the footage, I'm still grateful to \nyou for making the day possible. But of course I'd like to use the footage. I decided when--way back-- we got \nthis very negative answer back from his lawyers that I should just take my time about asking --since it \nwould take us 2 years to be ready to edit the footage anyway (The online course is chronological. When I \ntaped Woody we were still back in 1730. Now we've gotten to the 1920s) \n\nWell, we've now arrived at the season when we'll be editing materials on William Carlos Williams for our \ncourse on Modernism and, as we discussed on Saturday, on poetry and other arts, The Poetry of Art, Sport, \nand Play \n\nI would also, of course, love to make a tv episode out of the conversation, but the threshold question is \nwhether he'll let us use it for anything at all. In case it would matter, \n\nOther performers who have already taped with me include \nJohn Lithgow, \nDiane Paulus \nJulie Taymor \nNas \nEve Ensler \nDamian Woetzel \nKate Burton \nLil Buck Riley \nAlfre Woodard \nHerbie Hancock \nTony Kushner \nNatalia Zukerman \n\nand those who have agreed to tape with me include \nSally Field \nLena Dunham \nYo Yo Ma \nAnna Deveare Smith \nand more. \n\nThose in other fields include journalists, senators, president clinton etc etc. You've read my pitch before \n(many times) \n\nHis is one of only two releases that we haven't gotten. What do you think of my chances?\n\nLisa"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "send me the list of policticans the list you sent will generate an of course not"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "politicians I have taped \nBill Clinton \nAl Gore, \nJohn McCain \nMayor Rahm Emanuel \nMayor Tom Menino \nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan \nSir Mervyn King \nFormer Sec of Treasury Larry Summers \n\nyeses from politicians not yet scheduled \nVice President Biden \nSenator Mark Warner \nGovernor Jerry Brown \nUN representative Samantha Power \nformer sec of State, Henry Kissinger \nformer Sec of State Condaleeza Rice \nformer Chancellor of the NYC schools, Joel Klein \n\nIn other categories I have taped \nFrank Gehry, architect \nKatie Couric , David Brooks and Andrea Mitchell, journalists \nRichard Dawkins and Peter Gallison, scientists \nHead of the College Board, David Coleman \nDean of Harvard Law School, Martha Minow \nplus several poets laureate"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "12/7/2015 7:35:13 PM", "subject": "Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA", "body": "better list to present woody"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033107.txt_19203
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033107.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid [as]"], "timestamp": "8/21/2018 10:36:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "palm beach."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023564.txt_19204
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023564.txt
|
(BN) Leon Black's Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street M
|
[{"sender": "Glenn Dubin (DUBIN & COMPANY LP)", "recipients": ["undisclosed-recipients:;"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, December 27 2017 05:02 PM", "subject": "(BN) Leon Black's Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street M", "body": "(BN) Leon Black's Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street Model\n\nLeon Black's Tax-Overhaul Dilemma Could Alter Wall Street Model\n2017-12-27 11:00:00.2 GMT\nBy Simone Foxman and David Carey\n\n(Bloomberg) -- Leon Black recently posed a question whose answer will determine how profitable the new U.S. tax regime could make Wall Street firms like his Apollo Global Management LLC.\n\nPublicly traded partnerships, such as Apollo, are taxed differently than corporations. So should Apollo take advantage of the overhauled tax rules to pay less in taxes? Or should it use this chance to change to an Inc. from an LLC, which would increase its tax bill but allow it to attract investments from mutual funds that have previously been out of reach?\n\n\"We're still analyzing,\" Black told the Goldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference Dec. 6. \"It's an uncertain outcome.\"\n\nEither way, it's most likely a money-making outcome. The tax changes are a boon for private equity firms such as Apollo, where Black is chief executive officer. The new lower corporate rate has made it possible for bigger publicly traded partnerships to consider the change. As it is, management fees, which typically account for 30 percent or more of their earnings, are already taxed at the corporate rate. That will drop. The legislation scarcely touched the 23.8 percent rate paid on incentive fees, also called carried interest, which incur no additional levy when paid out to shareholders.\n\nDouble Tax\nIf the partnerships converted to corporations, the incentive fees would be hit with a second layer of tax when they're paid out. That would push the combined tax rate on incentive income paid out as dividends to nearly 40 percent, according to Peter Furci, co-chair of Debevoise & Plimpton's global tax practice.\n\nBut it would also allow the newly minted corporations access to indexes, and therefore the mutual-fund and ETF markets. About $2.2 trillion follows the S&P 500 Index, according to its website. As of June, $122.6 billion in assets tracked the Russell 2000 Index, the best-known small-cap U.S. stock index, and there was $1.1 trillion bet on Russell U.S. indexes overall, according to the company.\n\nThe bigger universe of investors would likely boost the trading multiples of the firms' stocks. It's unclear how big the economic benefit of increased ownership would be, so the question is whether it would make up for the higher taxes.\n\n\"There's no way to say how much multiple expansion you could get by converting,\" said Gerald O'Hara, who follows private equity firms for Jefferies Group. \"That's the question here that I think these firms are wrestling with.\"\n\nTax Complexity\nOne of the main reasons the funds have stayed away from private equity managers is tax complexity. Investors in typical stocks receive a Form 1099, a straightforward document that shows interest and dividends on investments at the end of each year. Owners of publicly traded private equity firms' stock get the Schedule K-1 instead. The K-1 shows their share of the partnership's interest, which determines how much the income is taxed. It's a headache, O'Hara said. Plus, firms can be inconsistent on the time of year they send out the forms, and the process of plugging in the numbers on a Schedule K-1 isn't as simple as it is for other kinds of income.\n\nSo asset managers, which offer options for many 401(k) investors, avoid buying shares of private equity firms.\n\nOn the campaign trail last year, President Donald Trump said he wasn't a fan of Wall Street \"paper pushers\" like hedge fund managers. He pledged to raise the tax rate on carried interest. The new tax law keeps it unchanged for investments held at least three years.\n\nHamilton Lane\nProponents of conversion to corporations point to Hamilton Lane Inc., an alternative-investment manager and pension-fund consultant that's a corporation and not a publicly traded partnership. The $1.9 billion company, which went public earlier this year, is now included in dozens of S&P, Russell and WisdomTree Investments Inc. indexes. Hamilton Lane shares have about doubled since the initial public offering.\n\nAres Management LP, created by former Apollo executives, is the most likely of its peers to make the jump, according to analysts at Keefe Bruyette & Woods Inc. Much of its revenue comes from management fees, so becoming a corporation would hurt its after-tax earnings relatively little.\n\nBill Mendel of Mendel Communications, a spokesman for Ares, said the firm is studying the situation. Apollo spokesman Charles Zehren of Rubenstein Associates declined to comment.\n\nWhen Black spoke to the Goldman Sachs conference, he said he was certain of one thing: None of the big publicly traded partnerships wanted to be first to undergo conversion.\n\n\"If somebody does go first and their stock doesn't move up, then you'll know that was a pretty dumb decision,\" he said. If, on the other hand, the \"stock does great, then all of us may have converted\" in two or three years.\n\n--With assistance from Ben Steverman and Carolina Wilson."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029976.txt_19215
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029976.txt
|
Bobby Slayton
|
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Epstein Jeffrey [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "ee", "Francis Derby"], "timestamp": "9/10/2012 5:01:27 PM", "subject": "Bobby Slayton", "body": "Bobby Slayton will be in LA on Sept. 18th (he said if you are hosting Obama in NY though, he could make the effort to attend)\n\nBelow from Bobby re the dinner he would like to have:\n\n> AND Tuesday the 16th is perfect for dinner with David And Lewis And if Woody Makes it GREAT, if not, always fun to hang with JE!!! David Brenner said he would try to change his flight if only Monday works! ! But the boys are definately in for Tuesday!!!\n\nMay I tell Bobby the 16th is good for dinner AND invite Woody?\n\nLyn & Jojo are back to work on Oct. 16th (they are home on 15th)\n\nLinda Stone will be in NY and staying in an apt Oct. 13-17"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028498.txt_19234
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028498.txt
|
Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "just send to peggy. youherco. its better for her"}, {"sender": "Steven Pfeiffer <q>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:38 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "Hi Jeffrey —\n\nSounds good. Thanks so much for confirming. If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I can send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs.\n\nCOMPANY NAME (if applicable):\nCONTACT NAME:\nADDRESS LINE 1:\nADDRESS LINE 2:\n\nMany thanks.\nBest,"}, {"sender": "\"jeffrey E.\" <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steven Pfeiffer", "Pegsy Siegal", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: 2017 IFP Gotham Awards", "body": "happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats."}]
| 3
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032821.txt_19235
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032821.txt
|
RE: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "where?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 9:58 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Reading the nytimes trump tax story...so wish I was with you right now...so where are you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:45 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Florida"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:21 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Anything surprise you?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a 3 year old only. however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on estates and gigts are taxed on the value of what was transferred not the underlying thing. ex if you own 10 percent of a partnership interest in a 1 million builidng that cannot be sold for 20 years. what is the value of your interest. not 10 percent of 1 million as you only own a ltd partnership right. maybe 2 percent. its all legal"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "But isn't the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Re: ", "body": "Maybe"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/5/2018 1:48:46 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "Finally read the nytimes piece closely....with all due respect I am guessing you are wrong in dismissing/trivializing it....seems there are some hard facts that are very difficult for the big guy to explain"}]
| 10
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033281.txt_19239
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033281.txt
|
Poll: Trump closing in on Clinton
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/19/2015 5:48:50 PM", "subject": "Poll: Trump closing in on Clinton", "body": "http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/251425-poll-trump-closing-in-on-clinton"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023032.txt_19245
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023032.txt
|
Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": "The Duke <j", "recipients": ["Jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "What? I don't know any of this. How are you responding?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["The Duke"], "timestamp": "Fri Mar 04 16:31:26 2011", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": "Awitheridg@aol.com", "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following guestions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers cs a oc\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. PS says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032543.txt_19249
|
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032543.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/21/2017 3:07:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "just finished watching trump speech, he did well"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 16, 2017, at 1:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very complex. I passed your message. . in addition Im not sure what role you and your boss would like to\nplay in the yemen issue moving forward. . I think to progress what you and terje have spoken about, the rebel\n\nleaders are ready to propose a document they woudl like a cease fire , and halt .\n\nIf you like I can pass on their\n\nproposal. THIS IS NOT WHATIDO. my expertise is only money. . but it seems like your part of the world\n\nwould like advice. very complex for me."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023026.txt_19252
|
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023026.txt
|
Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein
|
[{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": ["Sirs"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which — | and other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nMs further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Fred Haddad", "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Debbie Fein"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:27:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
| 4
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033295.txt_19255
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033295.txt
|
Fw: Washington Post Article
|
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/13/2016 12:31:13 AM", "subject": "Fw: Washington Post Article", "body": "Thought u would be interested in this\nhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/20 1 6/05/12/california-allies-roll-out-new-pro-trump-super-pac-with-aim-of-raising-20-million-by-july/"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026420.txt_19262
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026420.txt
|
Fwd:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Governor Kenneth E. Mapp"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10 2016 10:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <eevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]
| 3
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030242.txt_19264
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030242.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mariana ldikowska"], "timestamp": "4/12/2014 11:24:06 AM", "subject": null, "body": "These conspiracy theories are an aberration and an insult to the memory of the crash victims, including the late \nPresident himself. As a Pole who is at least somewhat aware of the politics and economics of Poland, and a \njournalist who follows world politics and news developments daily, I am severely disappointed at the number of \npeople that are flocking to these conspiracy theories, and academics and professionals who propagate such ideas \nshould themselves feel ashamed. \nFirstly, there is absolutely no proof that there was any sabotage or subterfuge by either the Russians or the \nPrime Minister's political allies. Such accusations, then, without presenting any credible evidence, are \nslanderous. \nAlso, there would be no political or diplomatic capital gained by either of the \"accused\"... there would be little \nfor the Russian government to gain - it would be a huge diplomatic embarrassment for the Russian government \nto be found guilty of essentially assassinating a head of state. Kaczynski was one of the strongest allies of the \nU.S. among European leaders, and even Russia with its assertive diplomatic policies would not risk a complete \nbreakdown with the U.S. by killing a close ally. International condemnation would also follow, and the \nPresident - perhaps even the Prime Minister - would have to resign and wave good-bye to any political career in \nthe foreseeable future. Yes, \"even in Russia.\" \nSimilarly, for the Prime Minister's party, if he were actually complicit in the crash, that would man he - or his \nallies - committed a coup d'etat. Also, there will be early presidential elections in June, which might actually go \nin favor of the President's party because of a sympathy vote. The \"acting\" Presidency is in the hands of his party \nfor only two months.., so, again, the Prime Minister and his allies have nothing to gain and potentially \neverything to lose in the June vote. \nConspiracy-monging cheapens a national tragedy \nPolitical profit or loss questions aside, however, the conspiracy-monging seems to be taken as a way to discover \nwho's responsible for the tragedy and thus somehow bring them justice. However, it is not a healthy way to deal \nwith the tragedy. It is not conducive to national or personal healing. Furthermore, it disgraces and taints the \nmemory of those who died. \nIt only cheapens the tragedy and, sadly, may foreshadow what's to cone in the coming presidential campaign - \nthe tragedy may be used by certain groups or individuals to propagate their own agenda and assume the \npresidency. \nIt is not so different than what has been going on in the U.S., with the \"birthers\" claiming Barack Obarna is not \nlegally the President because he is not actually a citizen, or even natural-born citizen. Not as morbid, of course, \nbut still, in my honest opinion, ridiculous. \nBaseless, nonsensical conspiracies simply destroys the abikiy of the nation and people of Poland to move on \nand honor the memory of those lost, and cheapens the tragedy that has been felt by Poles as far away as Chicago \nas well, and commented on with deep sorrow and respect by U.S. politicians from Mayor Daley to President \nObama himself"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032835.txt_19265
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032835.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J Deevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/19/2019 12:56:20 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Please call me"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 18, 2019 7:44 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/18/business/trump-deutsche-bank.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029779.txt_19285
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029779.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/14/2013 8:47:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Article 1.\n\nWashington Post\n\nObama to make first trip to Israel, part of a potential new beginning with region.\n\nPresident Obama will travel to Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories next month to make an early second-term push for peace negotiations between two divided governments and to assess the broader political developments remaking the Middle East.\n\nIt will be Obama’s first trip as president to Israel, where suspicions run high in the aftermath of his unsuccessful early efforts at Middle East peacemaking.\n\nThe choice of destination — one that Obama avoided in his first term — suggests a revival of his ambitions abroad after a year of virtual dormancy on foreign affairs. The timing also points to a willingness on his part to quickly reengage a politically volatile foreign-"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032606.txt_19286
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032606.txt
|
Re: Interview with Futurism
|
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "Jeffrey, https://futurism.com/ editor (fast-growing media about science with over 25M unique readers) would like to have an interview with you. Same topic: Trump's cuts on science and your philanthropy. Would you be open to talk to them?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 11, 2017, at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/11/2017 6:51:05 PM", "subject": "Re: Interview with Futurism", "body": "great. when is good? are you coming to New York next week?"}]
| 3
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032062.txt_19302
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032062.txt
|
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 08, 2016 9:07 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 2:14:46 AM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Attachments: Redline of 10-7-16 Revisions to Opp by DKI.docx MGW EDITS.docx"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015015.txt_19304
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015015.txt
|
Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell
|
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Rich Beckler", "Ken Adams"], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:06:29 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Do you remember when I'd asked you what your daughters did for a living? Especially last night Mr. Beckler, as most Friday nights, no?\n\nYes, they are the new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell; for you Richard Beckler, this originated from my being a former Stone Ridge classmate of his elder daughter Katie Beckler, and because he was on the Board of Stone Ridge during this period in time when my every family, friend, acquaintance and association was being contacted, bribed in one form or another, and turned against me (see below); as for Ken Adams, it stemmed from my having contacted him for representation in my 2011-filed case against IBM also during this period of time when my every communication were being tracked."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "We know of course that Saturdays are reserved for Matthew Horton."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 4, 2017 12:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Number?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "7/4/2017 5:57:07 PM", "subject": "Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Too down...give me another day"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030675.txt_19306
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030675.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 3:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Number? I have s truly funny one"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon won...tax code fucks rich people"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you so"}]
| 8
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.txt_19307
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.txt
|
Fw: THE TERRAMAR PROJECT
|
[{"sender": "G Maxwell", "recipients": ["J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/11/2015 1:25:56 PM", "subject": "Fw: THE TERRAMAR PROJECT", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Philip Barden", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, 11 January 2015 05:27", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saying nothing is reputational suicide. Even if. is discredited by people will know JE paid her off and believe G was complicate absent a credible denial. \nNow it is reported that G engaged in direct abuse - as I feared would happen. Next reports to the authorities will be made. \nIt is necessary from a litigation, investigatory and reputational reason to issue a cogent denial. \nI can see why JE doesn't want this as it may not suit him but he is already toast. \nPhilip"}, {"sender": "Ross", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10 Jan 2015, at 18:42", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Had Geordie on the phone half a dozen times today. \nHe would have give us a better hearing than most I figure. \nStrongly believe saying nothing is the wrong thing - especially as Dershowitz has a big piece coming in The Times on Monday. \nRest up and speak Monday \nBest \nRoss"}, {"sender": "Philip Barden", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:27:12 +0000", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All \nI am back on line now. \nI see the statement didn't go. Monday? Maybe tomorrow? \nI will speak to Jeffery Epstein's lawyer but JE has a conflict with you and will want your silence as whilst you are being attacked there is less heat on him. \nEither is lying or not. If we let her lie without challenge then the lies become the reality and that may lead to you facing investigation. These are serious allegations and In the UK prosecuting people who face allegations of sex abuse is now common place and a lot of resources are focused on this. \nWe can't sit back and let you be a conspirator by silence. \nYour are not guilty and must follow Dershowtiz line. He is a leading lawyer and he hasn't followed the don't say anything for fear of litigation. He has rightly called . bluff and shouted his innocence. \nYou have to stand up and deny the allegations or be branded guilty by association and that may lead to other investigations and worse. \nI feel I am going around in circles. \nI know what is right to do and that is to shout your innocence. \nTry and get some rest. Call me tomorrow if you want anytime. \nSpeak to Deshowitz. \nDon't allay yourself to JE as that is not the way to go. \nBest \nPhilip"}, {"sender": "G Maxwell", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "10 Jan 2015, at 16:02", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am out of my depth to understanding defamation and other legal hazards and don't want to end up in a law suit aimed at me from anyone if I can help it. Apparently even saying is a her has hazard! I have never been in a suit criminal or civil and want it to stay that way. \nThe US lawyers for the Jane Does are filling additional discovery motions and if I speak I open my self to being part of discovery apparently. I am trying to stay out of litigation and not have to employ lawyers for years as I get lost in US legal nightmare. I stand no legal risk currently on these old charges and civil suits against Jeffrey \nWe need to consult with US lawyers on any statement I make and the complaints too \nPerhaps we make a statement of the legal risk of saying anything for potential defamation or something that prevents a full and frank detailed rebuttal + the press not being the place for that? Regardless, Philip plse call jeffrey lawyer and see what you can understand from him and pehaps craft something in conjunction with him? \nEither way I think you need to speak to him to understand my risk so you can help me understand it - too may cooks in the kitchen and I can't make good decisions. Plse reach out to him today \n+ I have already suffered such a terrible and painful loss over the last few days that I can't even see what life after press he'll even looks like - statements that don't address all just lead to more questions. .what is my relationship to clinton ? Andrew on and on. \nLet's rest till monday. I need head space"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030214.txt_19308
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030214.txt
|
Fwd:
|
[{"sender": "paul krassner | a |", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/7/2017 7:12:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "James Drougas <j", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fwd:", "body": "Hi Paul. I've been spending lots of time with Irwin Corey and his family past two weeks especially.\nHe was in hospital until the last week and then He died a few hours ago peacefully at home in bed. Last\nnight he told me Trump will be assassinated soon. He was eager to learn the news each day. I asked him\nif he would join the anti Trump rallies when he gains strength. Doctors thought he might live many\nmonths. Alas he was laughing and smiling till the end and frowning about Trump.\n\nWarm and loving regards\n\nJim Drougas\n\nMy friend Alana, a young comedian, was here with him most nights. Irwin used to say he will live to\n147. Alana explained that 102 is 147 in comedian years."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030885.txt_19311
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030885.txt
|
RE:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 17, 2010 7:32 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "woody asked summer , so what do you do? 30 minutes later , she had not taken a breath. . either medicated, or manic..,,\n\nDo ee ee ee ee ee i ee ee a"}, {"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2010 1:13:39 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Neither very funny...always ask for the 3 minute version but most of the girls you Know haven't spoken for a total of 30\nminutes in all the time you knew them....she is a GREAT girl who is refreshing in this business totally focused and smart.\nJeffrey | brought her to a meeting with scientists a few months back she knew more than they did and totally embarrassed\nnot only the scientists but the client was totally unprepared for what she knew, she actually was able to tell them things\nthey were and weren't doing that they had no clue of and they changed there practices at p&g!!!! this is the kind of girl to\nmold she is the leader in her field of sustainability ny times wrote an article if you cant afford al gore hire summer rayne\nsays something.\n\nXOXO"}]
| 2
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033242.txt_19329
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033242.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/13/2017 11:38:59 PM", "subject": null, "body": "WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump held the first meeting of his full Cabinet today, vowing to take the fight against terrorism to the very end and said \"we are going to starve the beast\" by stopping its funding. \n\n\"One of the big things that we did - and you're seeing it now with Qatar and all of the things that are actually going on in a very positive fashion - we are stopping the funding of terrorism,\" Trump told reporters at the White House. \n\nRead more at:\nhttp://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/59116707.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst\n\n--"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033256.txt_19333
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033256.txt
|
PR Bonds
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/4/2017 4:24:27 PM", "subject": "PR Bonds", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/video/2017/10/04/trump-puerto-rico-debt-will-have-to-be-wiped-out.html"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031231.txt_19335
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031231.txt
|
JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN
|
[{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Gary H. Baise", "Alan Fraade"], "timestamp": "July 13, 2016 at 6:26:21 AM EDT", "subject": "JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "SIR\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP WILL KNOW THAT GARY BAISE IS WORKING ON THE NEEDED FOOD POLICY POINTS OF FACT WITH THE FOOD INDUSTRY LEADERS .\n\nPRESIDENT TRUMP UNDERSTANDS THAT THE FOOD INDUSTRY IS VITAL TO THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE POLICY .\n\nWHAT IS NEEDED IN THE PRESENTATION TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WILL BE DONE BY OUR TEAM THAT NOW HAS THE KEY JOB AT THE STEVEN\n\nHOFFENBERG TRUMP SUPER PAC IN BUYING OVER $ 1 BILLION DOLLARS IN ADS & T\n\nHE HIRING OF THE BUS PROJECT TO GET OUT THE VOTE IN EVERY POOR AREA IN THE\nUSA.\n\nTHE POOR VOTER OVER 120 MILLION VOTERS THAT WERE DEMS ARE NOW VOTING FO\nR PRESIDENT TRUMP ON NOV 8 2016.\n\nT V EXPERTS DONT REPORT THE ABOVE DEMS POOR FOLKS THAT ARE VOTING FOR PR\n\nTHE POOR VOTER WILL PUT PRESIDENT IN THE WHITE HOUSE IN THE 2016 RACE.\n\nOUR BUS PROJECT IS VITAL TO THE PRESIDENT TRUMP GET OUT THE VOTE IN NOVEM\nJUDGE SWEET PLAYS THE KEY PART NOW IN THE TOWERS VICTIMS SUIT AGAINST\nJEFF EPSTEIN !!!!\n\nJEFF EPSTEIN HAS THE PICTURES OF BILL CLINTON HAVING SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE\nGIRLS WI!!\nBILL CLINTON & JEFF EPSTEIN BOTH HAD SEX WITH THE UNDERAGE GIRLS THAT ARE\n\nJEFF EPSTEIN IS NOT IN FEDERAL PRISON ONLY BECAUSE JEFF EPSTEIN IS HOLDING TH"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030649.txt_19344
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030649.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to\n\nTrump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-\nstrategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747\n\nAnd...I have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if we\nwants a ride"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:18:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will ask. How long in New York? Get together?"}]
| 5
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030200.txt_19347
|
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030200.txt
|
Indicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History - Lawfare
|
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathyruemmler@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/19/2018 5:30:40 PM", "subject": "Indicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History - Lawfare", "body": "https://www.lawfareblog.com/indicting-president-not-foreclosed-complex-history\n\nIndicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The\nComplex History\n\nCan a sitting president be indicted? Often, in answering this question, commentators point to\nOffice of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinions answering in the contrary. To whatever extent the\nwriter agrees or disagrees with the opinions’ conclusion, the government’s position on the\nmatter is usually presented as a long-standing and clear “no.”\n\nThe reality is more complicated. The United States has addressed this question six times 1n\nboth internal memos and briefs filed in litigation. And a review of these documents shows\nthat it is far from clear what criminal prosecution steps are (or should be) precluded—and\nthat there is no “longstanding policy” against indictment of the president. Consider the 1973\nOLC memo stating that a sitting president should not be indicted. Far from being\nauthoritative, it was essentially repudiated within months by the Justice Department in the\nUnited States’ filing in the Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon.\n\nLikewise, the most recent opinion—an OLC memo written in 2000—includes brief\nstatements that a sitting president should not be indicted even if all further proceedings are\npostponed. But far from being definitive, this 1s a matter that could be reconsidered by the\ndepartment. Moreover, of course, OLC opinions are not binding on state prosecutors (though\nstate charges could raise federalism questions as well). The complex history of criminal\nproceedings against presidents and vice presidents suggests that these issues are not\nforeclosed.\n\nPerhaps the most important point that emerges from a review of all the opinions 1s this: nly\nonce has the United States addressed the question of whether a president can be an\nunindicted co-conspirator. The conclusion was an unequivocal yes. Richard Nixon was so\nnamed in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica\nand defended by the United States in United States v. Nixon. (The Supreme Court did not\nresolve the question.) No department opinion or filing has ever contradicted that position.\nThe fact that it is permissible to name a sitting president as unindicted co-conspirator,\nmoreover, tends significantly to undermine the only argument against tndicting a sitting\npresident."}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032005.txt_19359
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032005.txt
|
Re: My Wall Street 2 Story
|
[{"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "Wrote this for the February issue of AVENUE Magazine. Thought it would amuse you. Tell me what you think of it.\n\nxoxo Peggy\n\nHD: Wall Street, Take Two\n\nDEK: In the upcoming sequel to Oliver Stone’s groundbreaking film, Gordon Gekko gets out of jail and back to business. Peggy Siegal takes us behind the scenes where she got herself on camera along with a few of her famous friends. Nice work if you can get it.\n\nIn 1987, right after director Oliver Stone won the Academy Award for \"Platoon,\" he immediately turned to a domestic arena and began working on \"Wall Street\" in New York City where his father had been a stockbroker. Although the film was widely seen as a scathing critique of the culture of Wall Street, Stone has said that part of the film is a defense of capitalism, his father's vision of finance (as seen through the Hal Holbrook character) and an homage to his father.\n\nAt the time Oliver was also fascinated with the connection between the psyche of Latino Miami drug dealers from his earlier \"Scarface\" script and the American-born 28- to 35-year-old, white collar stockbrokers. Both groups had an animalistic need to obtain big and fast money. They shared an obsession with corruption and greed.\n\nOliver sent his actors to Bear Stearns for research, including then-newcomer Charlie Sheen, who played Bud Fox, a kid from nowhere. When he learns to cold call, and lands one big client, Gordon Gekko, Fox is thrust into the fast lane with a rock star financial mentor who teaches him corruption.\n\nOliver needed an old-fashioned villain to create drama, and he cast Michael Douglas as Gekko against type. Michael was not known as a heavy at the time, but as a charming, handsome, sensitive leading man. Oliver also saw the anger, confidence, salesmanship and style that Michael brought to the role. Michael's Gekko looked a bit like Laker's coach Pat Riley with his slicked back hair and well-cut suits, and it became Michael’s most important role, winning him the Academy Award for the villain no one could ever forget."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "1/12/2010 12:28:25 AM", "subject": "Re: My Wall Street 2 Story", "body": "terrific. i want to hear more about the trip"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030612.txt_19363
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030612.txt
|
Re: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gqmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic <borisnikolic@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun.\n\nIt is fun for a short time but I am already getting sick of so many meetings!\n\nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has some questions re microsoft.\n\nHow are you?\n\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 5:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "No problem. I am meeting him as he has some questions. I do not need anything from him.\n\nAlso nathan wolf requested a mtg. Will meet him at some cocktail later. Much better that way!\nHow are you?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}]
| 5
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022806.txt_19365
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022806.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://pcople.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients, he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife. boies is going to be in the fining line, from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG„ his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <11.>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/7/2017 3:00:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?"}]
| 4
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030606.txt_19371
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030606.txt
|
Re: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic", "possibly"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "yes you do, you need to laugh and have fun, he is good at that."}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031518.txt_19377
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031518.txt
|
Re:
|
[{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:21:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI.\n\nIn the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance from FBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting time of election, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted on our\n\nFacebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US.\n\nOur model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data must be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I believe its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or elections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is\n\nexpensive and the start up is running out of money.\n\nIam going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.\n\nRegards,\nZubair Khan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not so good"}]
| 2
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032011.txt_19380
|
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032011.txt
| null |
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 2:14:44 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Mueller statement at 1lam will be interesting - I think it's because of Michael wolff'’s new book and the\nreference to a draft indictment- it probably will be helpful to DIT - talk after"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012680.txt_19389
|
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012680.txt
|
Menchel
|
[{"sender": "A.", "recipients": ["Lilly"], "timestamp": "Fri, -----", "subject": "Menchel", "body": "Dear Lilly:\nThank you for your letter of August 2nd regarding your proposal on how to resolve the Epstein matter.\n\nAs we explained at our meeting on July 31, 2007, the Office believes that the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for negotiations, it is the minimum term of imprisonment that will obviate the need for federal prosecution. The Office has never agreed that a state prison sentence is not appropriate for Mr. Epstein. Rather we simply stated that if Mr. Epstein preferred to serve his sentence in a federal penetentiary, we would be willing to explore a federal conviction that may allow that in lieu of any state resolution. Further, as I made clear in"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032107.txt_19391
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032107.txt
|
ASW Travel Deals: Sky Dive Mount Everest, See New York's Newest, Do Paris's Chicest
|
[{"sender": "asmallworld@travel.asmallworld.net", "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "8/3/2011 2:11:03 PM", "subject": "ASW Travel Deals: Sky Dive Mount Everest, See New York's Newest, Do Paris's Chicest", "body": "\"New and noteworthy\" is a term that gets tossed around a lot in the travel world, but we're taking it seriously to heart this week at Jetsetter. The \"new\" is the Dream Downtown NYC, a hip, reinvented space at the crossroads of Chelsea and the Meatpacking District (MePa, if you really must). The \"noteworthy\" is a little thing called skydiving at Mount Everest. Whether it's lounging poolside in New York or jumping out of a plane in full view of the world's highest mountain, there's a lot going on this week. Read on for all the details, including properties in Paris, San Francisco, Vegas, Miami and more. (Image: Skydive Mount Everest - on sale Sat, Aug 6.)\n\nHip Manhattan Newcomer... with Real Sand\n\nDream Downtown - NYC\n\nThe new Dream Downtown has the best of both worlds. Housed in a 1960s building designed by Albert C. Ledner, it's situated at the crux of Manhattan's art, design and nightlife scenes between Chelsea and the Meatpacking District. With a hot rooftop bar, a Miami-meets-Ibiza pool (with lounge chairs set in real sand) and modern rooms with classic Downtown views, you can have your party and a good night's sleep, too.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nRomance by the Arc de Triomphe\n\nMon Hotel - Paris\n\nJust a short walk from the Arc de Triomphe, Mon Hotel sits on a quiet street off the bustling boulevards. Designer Aurélia Santoni fashioned this intimate boutique property with eccentricity and flair; lampshades from Dutch design firm Moooi hang above Utrecht armchairs in the lobby. Above all, the style of the guestrooms and the service stress comfort; Mon feels like your personal Paris pied-à-terre.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nBeach, Spa, Repeat in Crete\n\nCandia Maris Resort - Crete\n\nJust outside Heraklion, Crete's capital city, the Candia Maris is a sprawling beachside resort spanning nearly 10 acres. Although the property lacks the charm of smaller hotels, it more than compensates with its amenities, which include tennis courts and seven pools. The highlight is the vast thalassotherapy spa, which underwent a multimillion-dollar renovation in 2008.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nSleep in a Palace in Portugal\n\nVidago Palace - Portugal\n\nIn the mountainous north of the country, just over an hour from Porto, the recently opened Vidago Palace has, in one fell swoop, raised the bar for luxury getaways in Portugal. As far removed from the sun and sand of the touristy Algarve as you can get, this is a destination for the discerning traveler and the lover of fine things, whether they be cigars, hand-painted silk wallpaper, the country's best spa or a championship golf course.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nThe Budapest Bauhaus\n\nMamaison Hotel Budapest\n\nLeisure and business travelers feel like locals at this historic boutique hotel set among the embassies and grand residences of Budapest's tree-lined Andrassy Avenue. Built in 1937 and completely renovated three years ago, the hotel is home to a hip-again Bauhaus style in the comfortable rooms and gourmet dining at on-site Baraka Restaurant. For exploring, you can't beat the location: It's a short walk to restaurants, parks, museums and the city's famed thermal baths.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nA Study in Swiss Chic\n\nCervo - Switzerland\n\nThe Cervo may have a Swiss address, but there's nothing neutral about this boutique hotel's atmosphere and hospitality. In Zermatt, a legendary ski village where the Matterhorn (\"Horu\" to locals) dominates the landscape (and the activities, yearround) the hotel has the requisite majestic views. But modern interiors and quirky accents like antlers and cheerful checkerboard patterns make the Cervo a study in Swiss chic.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nLiving the Fantasy in Las Vegas\n\nThe Palms - Las Vegas\n\nThe Palms Las Vegas is all about classic hedonism: nightlife, gambling, pool parties and sweet guestrooms for more after-hours fun. Within the Palms enclave, the Palms Fantasy Tower flaunts a cool, contemporary feel to suit the tastes of its young and stylish party-hard crowds, perfect for hosting the true \"what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas\" experience.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nA Classic San Francisco Stay\n\nOmni San Francisco Hotel\n\nIn a beautifully renovated redbrick-and-stone former bank building, the Omni San Francisco has an elegant ambiance and draws inspiration from Renaissance Florence. The spacious rooms have carved-mahogany furniture and nine-foot-high crown molded ceilings, while sparkling crystal chandeliers, mahogany paneling and an iron-and-marble staircase define the lobby. Best of all, it's within walking distance from some of the city's top attractions like Union Square, North Beach and Chinatown.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nHilltop Romance on Phuket\n\nThe Pavilions - Phuket\n\nThese hilltop retreats are some of Phuket's most romantic crash pads thanks to sublime panoramic Andaman Sea views and the island's most discreet staff. All villas include swimmable pools and roomy decks for sun and shade. The 360 bar attracts the island's best dressed inhabitants who flock here at sundown for the calm view then stay sipping colorful cocktails late into the warm night.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nBeachfront Zen Near Cancun\n\nLa Amada Hotel - Playa Mujeres\n\nLooking more like some millionaire's Miami crib than a traditional Cancún resort, the all white, Zen-minimalist La Amada Hotel exudes a down-to-earth sexiness and an understated elegance - all creamy sofas, gauzy curtains and personal Jacuzzis. Just 20 minutes north of central Cancún in Playa Mujeres, La Amada is on a long, pristine and very secluded beach.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nStately Style in the Heart of Washington D.C.\n\nThe Madison - D.C.\n\nNamed for James Madison, the fourth president and \"father of the Constitution,\" this stately hotel has traditional style and refined service - plus, a location that puts many of Washington's must-see museums and monuments along the Mall within walking distance. Opened in 1963, the 353-room hotel has hosted the Dalai Lama, the occasional celebrity and every U.S. president since John F. Kennedy except Barack Obama. But don't worry - you can stop by the White House, which is just five blocks away.\n\nClick here to visit sale Now Live\n\nWhere Esther Williams Meets Chanel\n\nThe Raleigh - South Beach\n\nThe Raleigh is different from most properties in South Beach, with a vibe that's more Deco cool than decked out to the nines. A stay here feels a bit like a trip to the 1940s - dressed in whites one minute, casual the next. It's all about lounging in style by the pool, which has hosted everything from Esther Williams swimming routines to Chanel's cruise collection show. The Raleigh itself is a lot like that pool: cool, pretty and a place to be seen.\n\nClick here to preview sale Starting Thursday 4/8 at 8pm BST\n\nThe Classic SoCal Beach Escape\n\nShorebreak - California\n\nShorebreak, a 157-room hotel on Huntington Beach, lives up to the SoCal lifestyle celebrated on breezy beach postcards. From your private balcony, you'll gaze over a classic California coast pier, with the Pacific stretching out behind it. Surf by day, then chow down on room-service orecchiette pasta with seared diver scallops before heading out to a beachside bonfire.\n\nClick here to preview sale Starting Thursday 4/8 at 8pm BST\n\nAttention Adrenaline Junkies\n\nSkydive Mount Everest\n\nAs any adrenaline junkie knows, skydiving is the ultimate thrill: Those few seconds during free fall are as close to flying as we humans will probably ever get. Now imagine hurling yourself out of a plane at 29,500 feet - in full view of Mount Everest. To call it a rush would be an understatement, but tour company Everest Skydive makes this once-in-a-lifetime experience possible. During this 10-night/11-day tour, beginning in Kathmandu, you'll get your bearings on the ground with some sightseeing and then hike up to the drop site, where the true adventure begins. And with all the details - accommodations, gear, professional instruction - taken care of, skydivers can simply enjoy the (truly unforgettable) moment.\n\nClick here to preview sale Starting Saturday 6/8 at 5pm BST\n\nThe South African Safari Goes Posh\n\nMorukuru - South Africa\n\nIn the heart of the Madikwe Game Reserve, Morukuru Family's trio of boutique-chic, exclusive lodging options are the perfect pick for small groups seeking an intimate, totally tailor-made bush adventure. Half wild, half unabashedly posh, the getaway is less than a four-hour drive - or an even shorter charter plane ride - from Johannesburg. Choose between the Owners House, the Lodge or the Farm, and the the only people you'll share sundowners and lion cub photos ops with will be the pack you arrived with. Family-friendly and super flexible, this is a true South African safari vacation, complete with personal cooks, butlers and animal trackers at your service.\n\nClick here to preview sale Starting Saturday 6/8 at 5pm BST\n\nSales this week\n\nStarting Today at 8pm BST\nMamaison Hotel Budapest \nSofitel Montreal Golden Mile \nCervo - Switzerland \n\nStarting Thursday at 8pm BST\nThe Shores - Daytona Beach \nThe Raleigh - South Beach \nShorebreak - California \n\nStarting Friday at 5pm BST\nVeranda House - Nantucket \n\nStarting Friday at 8pm BST\nIron Horse Hotel - Milwaukee \nHidden Pond - Maine \nKedron Valley Inn - Vermont \n\nStarting Saturday at 5pm BST\nA Culinary Retreat in Mexico \nMorukuru - South Africa \nSkydive Mount Everest \n\nStarting Sunday at 5pm BST\nThe Alexandra - Turks & Caicos \n\nStarting Sunday at 8pm BST\nLas Alamandas - Mexico \nArenas del Mar Beachfront \nBlue Waters - Antigua \nNayara Hotel, Spa & Gardens \n\nStarting Monday at 8pm BST\nHotel Matilda - San Miguel \nSanta Teresa - Rio De Janeiro"}]
| 1
|
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014860.txt_19395
|
IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014860.txt
|
EU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE: SALES TOP PICKS = SOC GEN, INTESA, NORDEA
|
[{"sender": "Ens, Amanda", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn [nn"], "timestamp": "4/7/2017 12:24:59 PM", "subject": "EU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE: SALES TOP PICKS = SOC GEN, INTESA, NORDEA", "body": "We remain positive on banks that can make acceptable returns in the current environment and are geared into the upside when rates begin to recover... ING, KBC, Intesa, Unicredit, SocGen, Erste, BKIR are all Buy rated.\n\nGlobal Equities Z\n\nBank of America\n\nSpecialist Sales — European Financials Merrill Lynch\n\nMAR disclosure\n\nEU BANKS: BIG EQUITY OUTFLOWS BUT REMAIN UPBEAT ON REFLATION TRADE\n\nSpec Sales Comment:\n\nBofAML SESE See ee oe oe eee outflows in 40 weeks and first outflows YTD (click here). Our BofAML Bull & Bear Indicator is now at 7.1, the highest level since Jul'14 and not far from \"sell\" signal. So is this just a pause for breath in the reflation trade? BofAML strategists think so. In our updated thoughts this morning we think reflation is real so stay long equities, short rates, selectively long USD (click here).\n\nChart 12: BofAML B&B Indicator (scale from 0 to 10)\n\nExtreme\nBearish Bullish\n\nSource: BofA Merill Lynch Global Investment Strategy\n\nThe main reasons for equity investor concern in recent weeks = the gap between hard and soft data, plus the delay in the Trump fiscal package"}]
| 1
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026484.txt_19417
|
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026484.txt
|
Fwd: Re:
|
[{"sender": "Andrew M Grossman <andrew.grossman@bakerlaw.com>", "recipients": ["Rivkin, David"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mueller's Fruit of the Poisonous Tree\n\nIt makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation is tainted by the bias that attended its origin in 2016."}, {"sender": "David Rivkin <david.rivkin@...>", "recipients": ["Andrew M Grossman"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 22, 2018 at 7:50 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Can you please send me WSJ op Ed. Tx"}, {"sender": "David Rivkin", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Here it is."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:44 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "Big deal"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "6/23/2018 4:01:37 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Re:", "body": "i htink weak thoughts?"}]
| 5
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032891.txt_19419
|
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032891.txt
|
Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg
|
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:56 AM", "subject": "Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg", "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-30/this-chart-predicts-trump-will-win-unless-the-s-p-rallies-in-october"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 3:05:32 AM", "subject": "Re: This Chart Predicts Trump Will Win, Unless the S&P Rallies in October - Bloomberg", "body": "tuesday"}]
| 2
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.