Datasets:
source_index int64 0 2.16k | custom_id stringlengths 49 176 | ground_truth stringclasses 1
value | prompt listlengths 2 6 | messages listlengths 3 7 | completion stringlengths 1.15k 53.5k | final_answer stringlengths 9 9.47k | steer_count int64 2 104 | exec_count int64 2 104 | length_tokens_total int64 364 16.4k | rollout_index int64 0 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | SYNTHETIC-2-SFT-cn-fltrd-final-ngram-filtered-chinese-filtered_94104 | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | <think>
<steer>Restate the problem</steer>
<exec>Okay, let's see if I need to check the solution provided for finding the line of intersection of two planes. The question gives two planes:
1. \(2x - y + 4z = 5\)
2. \(x + 3y - 2z = 6\)
The solution provided finds a point on the line by setting z = 0 and solving for x a... | The solution provided to find the line of intersection of the planes \(2x - y + 4z = 5\) and \(x + 3y - 2z = 6\) is correct. Here's the detailed reasoning:
1. **Finding a Point on the Line**:
- The solution sets \(z = 0\) (intersecting the \(xy\)-plane) and solves the system:
\[
2x - y = 5 \quad \text{(1a... | 12 | 12 | 2,365 | 0 | |
1 | OpenThoughts3-full-filtered-science-decontam-v2_23608 | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | <think>
<steer>Identify core problem</steer>
<exec>Okay, so I need to explain why amides are weaker bases than amines. Let's start by recalling what I know about bases and their behavior in solution.</exec>
<steer>Define basicity</steer>
<exec>First, basicity here refers to the ability to accept a proton (H+). Amines, ... | Amides are significantly weaker bases than corresponding amines due to the following key factors:
1. **Resonance Stabilization**:
In amides (RCONH₂), the lone pair on the nitrogen is delocalized into the adjacent carbonyl group (C=O) via resonance. This delocalization forms a resonance structure where the negativ... | 21 | 21 | 2,253 | 0 | |
2 | SYNTHETIC-2-SFT-cn-fltrd-final-ngram-filtered-chinese-filtered_97527 | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | <think>
<steer>Identify the core objective</steer>
<exec>First, the question asks me to critique whether the given solution is correct. The solution attempts to prove that the solution set of \( ax + by + cz = 0 \) in \( \mathbb{R}^3 \), with \((a, b, c) \neq (0,0,0)\), is a vector space of dimension 2, using the rank-... | The solution provided is largely correct and effectively uses the rank-nullity theorem to prove that the solution set of \(ax + by + cz = 0\) in \(\mathbb{R}^3\) forms a vector space of dimension 2, given that \((a, b, c) \neq (0, 0, 0)\). Below is a detailed critique, highlighting the strengths and minor points for co... | 12 | 12 | 3,408 | 0 | |
3 | SYNTHETIC-2-SFT-cn-fltrd-final-ngram-filtered-chinese-filtered_99565 | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | <think>
<steer>State the objective</steer>
<exec>Okay, so I need to check if the curl of the vector field F is correctly calculated. Let me start by recalling how to compute the curl. The curl of a vector field F = ⟨f, g, h⟩ is given by the cross product of the del operator and F. The formula is:
curl F = (∂h/∂y - ∂g/... | The provided solution contains an error in the calculation of the j-component of the curl. Let's verify each component step by step:
1. **i-component**:
- $\frac{\partial h}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial}{\partial y} e^{y+z} = e^{y+z}$ (correct, as the derivative of $e^{y+z}$ with respect to $y$ is $e^{y+z}$).
-... | 15 | 15 | 2,662 | 0 | |
4 | OpenThoughts3-full-filtered-science-decontam-v2_10 | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | <think>
<steer>Define the problem and criteria</steer>
<exec>Okay, let's tackle this question. The task is to determine which of the given atoms in their ground electronic states does not have a half-filled subshell. The options are Ga (Gallium), H (Hydrogen), Mn (Manganese), K (Potassium), and As (Arsenic).</exec>
<st... | To determine which atom does not have a half-filled subshell in its ground electronic state, we analyze the electron configurations of each element:
1. **Hydrogen (H)**:
Configuration: \(1s^1\)
The \(1s\) subshell has 1 electron (half of its maximum of 2).
**Half-filled subshell present.**
2. **Potassi... | 20 | 20 | 2,049 | 0 | |
5 | OpenThoughts3-full-filtered-science-decontam-v2_283__aug__insert_only__beac02d74257 | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | <think>
<steer>Identify reactants and their solubility</steer>
<exec>Okay, let's see. I need to figure out what kind of reaction happens when aluminum sulfate and calcium phosphate react. I'll start by recalling what I know about chemical reactions. These two are both compounds, so maybe it's a double displacement reac... | The reaction between aluminum sulfate and calcium phosphate is a **double displacement (metathesis) reaction**. Here's the breakdown:
1. **Chemical Formulas**:
- Aluminum sulfate: \(\text{Al}_2(\text{SO}_4)_3\) (soluble).
- Calcium phosphate: \(\text{Ca}_3(\text{PO}_4)_2\) (insoluble, solid).
2. **Double ... | 26 | 26 | 3,609 | 0 | |
6 | SYNTHETIC-2-SFT-cn-fltrd-final-ngram-filtered-chinese-filtered_93407 | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | [
{
"content": "Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating non-empty <steer>...</steer> and <exec>...</exec> blocks, starting with <steer>. Use <steer> blocks to guide thinking, make executive decisions, choose subproblems, slow down, enumerate, verify, or backtrack. Ex... | <think>
<steer>Restate problem and setup</steer>
<exec>Okay, let's tackle this problem step by step. First, I need to understand the setup. We have a spherical shell with a charge of Q = -16e and radius R = 10 cm. At the center of this shell, there's a point charge q = +5e. The goal is to find the electric field at two... | The provided solution contains correct magnitude calculations for the electric fields at points P1 and P2 but incorrectly describes the directions. Below is a detailed critique:
### **1. Electric Field at P1 (6 cm, Inside the Shell)**
- **Correct Elements**:
- Enclosed charge is correctly identified as \( q_{\text{e... | 22 | 22 | 3,655 | 0 | |
7 | SYNTHETIC-2-SFT-cn-fltrd-final-ngram-filtered-chinese-filtered_99618 | [{"content":"Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating (...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating (...TRUNCATED) | "<think>\n<steer>Restate problem and initial conditions</steer>\n<exec>Okay, let's see. I need to cr(...TRUNCATED) | "To determine the correct matrix associated with the linear function \\( F: \\mathbb{R}^3 \\rightarr(...TRUNCATED) | 16 | 16 | 3,047 | 0 | |
8 | oasst1-r1-format-filtered-keyword-filtered-filter-datecutoff-chinese-filtered_oasst1_3238 | [{"content":"Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating (...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating (...TRUNCATED) | "<think>\n<steer>Identify user request</steer>\n<exec>Okay, so the user wants me to describe the mai(...TRUNCATED) | "The Python script for synchronizing files between S3 and local storage can be broken down into the (...TRUNCATED) | 15 | 15 | 1,812 | 0 | |
9 | OpenThoughts3-full-filtered-science-decontam-v2_27863__aug__insert_only__3942bef4a900 | [{"content":"Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating (...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"Solve the task. Put your reasoning in one <think>...</think> block made of alternating (...TRUNCATED) | "<think>\n<steer>Recall Jones vector properties</steer>\n<exec>Okay, so I'm trying to understand why(...TRUNCATED) | "The confusion arises from distinguishing between **global phase** (which is physically irrelevant) (...TRUNCATED) | 19 | 19 | 3,329 | 0 |
BASIC 10K
BASIC (Better Abstractions with Structure for Interpretability and Control) is a 10K-example supervised fine-tuning dataset for structured reasoning. Instead of one unbroken chain of thought, each trace alternates between a short decision and a longer execution:
<think>
<steer>Choose the next high-level step</steer>
<exec>Carry out that step in detail...</exec>
...
</think>
Final answer
This dataset accompanies our paper BASIC: Isolating Key Decisions During LLM CoT and its reference implementation. The format pulls high-impact decisions out of the surrounding reasoning, making them easier to inspect, change, and sample separately from the lower-level execution.
Dataset construction
We drew prompts from the Dolci-Think-SFT-7B dataset, stratifying across science, Python code, mathematics, multilingual chat, and instruction-following. A BASIC teacher then generated one or more complete structured responses for each selected prompt. These responses became the distillation examples in this release.
Earlier versions learned the markup without reliably following the hierarchy. To fix
that, we trained the teacher so that each <exec> span follows the decision in the
immediately preceding <steer> span, including when that decision is strongly
off-policy.
The final release has 10,000 traces from 2,138 source prompts, so some prompts have multiple rollouts. We capped each trace at 16,384 tokens, then cleaned and filtered the generations before release.
Example from the dataset
Here is a real example from the dataset (source_index=17, rollout_index=0).
User:
Determine the order, degree, linearity, unknown function, and independent variable of
the differential equation \( y'' - 5x(y')^4 = e^x + 1 \).
Assistant completion:
<think>
<steer>Define the goal</steer>
<exec>Okay, so I need to figure out the order, degree, linearity, unknown function,
and independent variable for the differential equation \( y'' - 5x(y')^4 = e^x +
1 \). Hmm, let's start by recalling what each of these terms means.</exec>
<steer>Determine the order</steer>
<exec>First, the order of a differential equation is determined by the highest
derivative present in the equation. Looking at the equation, I see \( y'' \) which is
the second derivative of y with respect to x. There's also \( y' \), which is the
first derivative, but since the highest is second, the order must be 2. So, order =
2.</exec>
...
Dataset structure
The repository has one train split in Parquet format. Each record includes:
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
source_index |
integer | Index of the selected source prompt. |
custom_id |
string | Identifier inherited from the source example. |
ground_truth |
string | Source-provided reference answer when available; otherwise empty. |
prompt |
list of messages | System/user conversation before the generated assistant response. |
messages |
list of messages | Complete training conversation, including the structured assistant response. |
completion |
string | Generated assistant response containing alternating <steer> and <exec> spans. |
final_answer |
string | Answer text extracted from the generated completion. |
steer_count |
integer | Number of <steer> spans in the completion. |
exec_count |
integer | Number of <exec> spans in the completion. |
length_tokens_total |
integer | Token count recorded during dataset generation. |
rollout_index |
integer | Rollout number for the source prompt. |
Every field is populated in every record. For chat-style supervised fine-tuning, use
messages. For completion-style pipelines, use prompt and completion.
BASIC format
BASIC traces alternate between decision--execution pairs:
(<steer> decision </steer>, <exec> execution </exec>)
The decision is a short, imperative instruction; the execution carries it out in
detail. In our decoding setup, <steer> spans are limited to 15 tokens and
<exec> spans to 512 tokens. Structured decoding enforces this grammar and lets the
two span types use different sampling parameters.
Add these four tokens to the tokenizer before training:
<steer> </steer> <exec> </exec>
Training setup
In our experiments, we used a deterministic 95/5 training/evaluation split
(9,500/500 records; shuffle seed 42), assistant-only supervision, packed 16,384-token
sequences, and a checkpoint after two epochs. The optimizer settings were
adamw_torch, learning rate 7e-6, betas (0.9, 0.95), epsilon 1e-6, weight decay
0.1, and bfloat16 precision.
Intended use
We built BASIC for research on:
- supervised fine-tuning of structured reasoning models;
- inspection and intervention at explicit reasoning boundaries;
- faithfulness to on-policy and off-policy steering decisions;
- decision-level exploration and adaptive inference; and
- interpretability and control of long-form reasoning.
The dataset is not a source of verified answers or a deployment-ready safety mechanism. Both the reasoning traces and their final answers can be wrong.
Limitations and responsible use
We evaluate mathematical reasoning, two model sizes, and controlled diversity tasks. We have not established that the results carry over to other domains, larger models, longer trajectories, or tool use.
More control over chain-of-thought can help with auditing, but it can also enable harmful steering or make a model look more faithful than it really is. Before any real-world use, we recommend access controls, logging, isolation from untrusted inputs, and independent checks of model outcomes. The source data is broad and multilingual, so generations may inherit errors, biases, unsafe material, or personal information from the prompts and teacher model. Apply whatever additional filtering your use case requires.
License and attribution
BASIC is released under the Open Data Commons Attribution License 1.0 (ODC-By-1.0). It derives from the Allen Institute for AI's Dolci-Think-SFT-7B, which is also distributed under ODC-By-1.0 and intended for research and educational use under Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines. Downstream users must preserve attribution and review the upstream terms.
Citation
Please cite the accompanying paper:
@inproceedings{proudfoot2026basic,
title = {{BASIC}: Isolating Key Decisions During {LLM} {CoT}},
author = {Proudfoot, Oliver and Perrault, Andrew},
booktitle = {NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Interpretability for Discovery},
year = {2026},
url = {https://github.com/olliepro/BASIC}
}
Integrity
The SHA-256 checksum of the released Parquet shard is recorded in
CHECKSUMS.sha256.
- Downloads last month
- 35