Improve dataset card: add task categories, paper link, and sample usage
#2
by nielsr HF Staff - opened
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,16 +1,43 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
-
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
---
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
# IsoFLOP Scaling Law Experiments
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Curated collection of IsoFLOP curve data from 6 experiments, standardized to a common schema.
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
## Schema
|
| 16 |
|
|
@@ -62,10 +89,6 @@ Scaling law survey data from Marghi et al. ([arxiv:2502.18969](https://arxiv.org
|
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
Marin community scaling ladder experiments: Llama 2 models trained on three datasets (Comma, DCLM, Nemotron). Raw data: vendored CSVs exported from the [Marin W&B project](https://wandb.ai/marin-community/marin/reports/Scaling-Ladders--VmlldzoxNTc0MjM1NQ). Budget is parsed from run names and multiplied by 3 to convert from forward-pass FLOPs (`≈2ND`) to total FLOPs (`≈6ND`); this factor was validated empirically across all runs. "Validation-optimal" runs (which use a different FLOPs convention) are excluded. Loss is `eval/paloma/macro_loss`.
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
-
## License
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
Apache 2.0
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
## Citation
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
```bibtex
|
|
@@ -75,4 +98,4 @@ Apache 2.0
|
|
| 75 |
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.22339},
|
| 76 |
year={2026}
|
| 77 |
}
|
| 78 |
-
```
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 4 |
+
- other
|
| 5 |
---
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
# IsoFLOP Scaling Law Experiments
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Curated collection of IsoFLOP curve data from 6 experiments, standardized to a common schema.
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
This dataset is associated with the paper [Problems with Chinchilla Approach 2: Systematic Biases in IsoFLOP Parabola Fits](https://huggingface.co/papers/2603.22339).
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+
- **Project Page:** [https://openathena.ai/scaling-law-analysis/](https://openathena.ai/scaling-law-analysis/)
|
| 14 |
+
- **Data Extraction Code:** [Open-Athena/scaling-law-analysis](https://github.com/Open-Athena/scaling-law-analysis)
|
| 15 |
+
- **Fitting & Analysis Library (vpnls):** [Open-Athena/vpnls](https://github.com/Open-Athena/vpnls)
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
## Sample Usage
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
The researchers provided the `vpnls` package to fit compute-optimal scaling laws using Variable Projection. Below is an example of how to use it with the scaling data:
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
```python
|
| 22 |
+
import numpy as np
|
| 23 |
+
from vpnls.api import fit_vpnls, simulate_isoflop_data
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
# Generate synthetic data (8 budgets x 16 points = 128 samples)
|
| 26 |
+
N, D, L = simulate_isoflop_data(
|
| 27 |
+
alpha=0.34, beta=0.28, A=406.4, B=410.7, E=1.69, # Chinchilla / Hoffmann et al. 2022
|
| 28 |
+
compute_budgets=np.geomspace(1e17, 1e22, 8), n_points_per_budget=16, noise_std=0,
|
| 29 |
+
)
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
# 2-digit exponent (alpha/beta) precision (~25ms)
|
| 32 |
+
result = fit_vpnls(N, D, L, method="grid", resolution=0.01)
|
| 33 |
+
# -> alpha=0.34, beta=0.28, E=1.6900, A=406.40, B=410.70 (recovery is already exact)
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
# 3-digit precision, 10 processes (~250ms on M4 Pro; 4-digit takes ~16s)
|
| 36 |
+
result = fit_vpnls(N, D, L, method="grid", resolution=0.001, num_workers=10)
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
# L-BFGS-B refinement from dense grid search above
|
| 39 |
+
result = fit_vpnls(N, D, L, method="jax") # or "scipy"
|
| 40 |
+
```
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
## Schema
|
| 43 |
|
|
|
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
Marin community scaling ladder experiments: Llama 2 models trained on three datasets (Comma, DCLM, Nemotron). Raw data: vendored CSVs exported from the [Marin W&B project](https://wandb.ai/marin-community/marin/reports/Scaling-Ladders--VmlldzoxNTc0MjM1NQ). Budget is parsed from run names and multiplied by 3 to convert from forward-pass FLOPs (`≈2ND`) to total FLOPs (`≈6ND`); this factor was validated empirically across all runs. "Validation-optimal" runs (which use a different FLOPs convention) are excluded. Loss is `eval/paloma/macro_loss`.
|
| 91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 92 |
## Citation
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
```bibtex
|
|
|
|
| 98 |
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.22339},
|
| 99 |
year={2026}
|
| 100 |
}
|
| 101 |
+
```
|