owner
stringclasses
14 values
repo
stringclasses
14 values
id
int64
116k
4.61B
issue_number
int32
1
181k
author
stringlengths
1
39
body
stringlengths
1
262k
created_at
timestamp[us]date
2000-06-06 02:40:44
2026-06-02 20:16:18
updated_at
timestamp[us]date
2000-06-06 02:40:44
2026-06-02 20:22:56
reactions
unknown
author_association
stringclasses
5 values
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,466,303
21,067
filimonov
@amosbird can you check it? Looks related to WITH changes.
2021-03-03T06:14:34
2021-03-03T06:14:34
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,630,740
21,361
cyberhuman
We did an upgrade today but AFAIK it didn't help. I will check in a while. Is there anything else I could look at?
2021-03-03T11:03:20
2021-03-03T11:03:20
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,676,579
21,361
cyberhuman
I took a look and there is no improvement after the upgrade. What I noticed by the way is that on the hosts in question and other hosts with the same issue there are too many parts (tens or hundreds of thousands). The number slowly goes down as (or if) they're merged. But the number of ongoing merges is very low (1 or...
2021-03-03T12:22:17
2021-03-03T12:22:17
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,740,906
18,978
tavplubix
> > Possibly we should change Changelog category to "Backward incompatible" and add a note that ATTACH PART[ITION] queries may not work during cluster upgrade. > > @tavplubix The proposed solution doesn't change the way the replicas process the commands if the data in detached/ is missing, I don't see the reason why...
2021-03-03T14:10:22
2021-03-03T14:10:22
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,268,922
21,361
cyberhuman
I have enabled debug logging and it looks like the replication queue entries are retried but always fail. And the reason for the failure is missing parts. What's worse, those parts have been removed from the replica that had them. Even the 15-4-0_3021_3021_0 mentioned in the beginning of the report was removed on the s...
2021-03-04T03:51:28
2021-03-04T03:52:21
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,311,775
21,390
den-crane
it never worked. Not a bug. Probably related to issue that aliases are not supported in views.
2021-03-02T23:59:38
2021-03-02T23:59:50
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,351,839
18,578
alexey-milovidov
Not relevant anymore.
2021-03-03T01:22:50
2021-03-03T01:22:50
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,362,954
21,388
alexey-milovidov
Need to construct a reproducer.
2021-03-03T01:50:53
2021-03-03T01:50:53
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,902,495
21,376
excitoon
@pumelo I mean, what do you have in log before this line? What is a logging level?
2021-03-03T17:18:34
2021-03-03T17:18:34
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,292,845
21,239
alexey-milovidov
It's not trivial to support global dictionary for Replicated tables since data can appear on servers in different order - it means that dictionary ids will be also selected in different way on replicas and replicated data will be not byte-identical.
2021-03-02T23:16:15
2021-03-02T23:16:15
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,349,028
21,361
cyberhuman
Thank you for looking into it! > So you rewrite 100 partitions fully every minute (sounds bad, maybe at least remove the partitioning, I guess the table is quite small). We're not rewriting, we're appending 🤔 The partitioning must be there because of the way the data will be queried later. We'll try to upgr...
2021-03-03T01:15:22
2021-03-03T01:15:39
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,621,986
21,411
filimonov
It was already removed. See https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/pull/11637 :)
2021-03-03T10:49:09
2021-03-03T10:49:09
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,694,082
21,381
akuzm
The failures are from master.
2021-03-03T12:54:17
2021-03-03T12:54:17
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,710,702
21,376
excitoon
@pumelo Can you please provide more detailed log?
2021-03-03T13:23:12
2021-03-03T13:23:12
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,932,578
21,087
alexey-milovidov
Yes, the basic rule - leave only what is relevant for the tests.
2021-03-03T17:51:02
2021-03-03T17:51:02
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,558,518
21,233
alesapin
No related failures
2021-03-03T09:08:23
2021-03-03T09:08:23
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,579,457
20,315
qoega
Is it related? https://clickhouse-test-reports.s3.yandex.net/0/a1424bc6750826250786071b2c80dfb44c07d164/fuzzer_debug/report.html#fail1 ``` sql SELECT 9223372036854775807, materialize(js2.k), NULL FROM (SELECT toLowCardinality(number) AS k, 1048576, number + NULL FROM numbers(1048577)) AS js1 FULL OUTER JOIN (SEL...
2021-03-03T09:40:39
2021-03-03T09:40:59
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,601,893
21,406
alex-zaitsev
cc @hexiaoting
2021-03-03T10:16:14
2021-03-03T10:16:14
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,745,659
21,395
Sallery-X
> > conflict > > Everything will be ok. See: #11637 > > You can explain it like that: leader now do an attempt to put the merge task in the queue. If in meanwhile queue changed he will remove the task, will reread the queue, and will do another attempt with respect to the changed queue state. the code follows ...
2021-03-03T14:17:20
2021-03-03T14:17:20
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,818,717
20,608
Exus
I still cannot reproduce crashes on my test environment (4 servers) - two servers 21.2.4.18+asan and two old 21.2.4.6, all replicating same tables. I've added some data (2bln rows with 2k/s ingest), and it's stable. Only crash I found is clickhouse-client on asan servers (cannot reproduce on other versions): when I ...
2021-03-03T15:56:16
2021-03-03T15:56:38
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,209,575
21,393
alexey-milovidov
@kitaisreal Bad cast is possible in `dictGet` function.
2021-03-04T01:25:22
2021-03-04T01:25:22
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,285,348
14,740
alexey-milovidov
I confirm, it's fixed.
2021-03-02T23:00:31
2021-03-02T23:00:31
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,375,266
21,359
haoch
@yiguolei Glad to know that you are interested. We may support multiple bucket distribution strategies, here explain with a very simple example. > 1. how to rebalance data when new node is added to the cluster? It could assign partition (say partition key is `date` and split into N buckets) to 1 of the virtua...
2021-03-03T02:20:40
2021-03-03T02:49:24
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,495,385
21,239
Teeeto
It might require shipping new dictionary entries together with insert data to replicas then? If it is common to insert to different replicas, it might be possible to reserve some bits of 64-bit ID as a replica ID ?
2021-03-03T07:14:40
2021-03-03T07:39:07
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,621,372
21,395
filimonov
> conflict Everything will be ok. See: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/pull/11637 You can explain it like that: leader now do an attempt to put the merge task in the queue. If in meanwhile queue changed he will remove the task, will reread the queue, and will do another attempt with respect to the change...
2021-03-03T10:48:05
2021-03-03T10:48:05
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,704,266
21,404
smagellan
max_block_size option maybe + take a look at jdbc driver docs: https://github.com/ClickHouse/clickhouse-jdbc. I know nothing about mybatis, though
2021-03-03T13:11:56
2021-03-03T13:11:56
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,743,600
18,978
tavplubix
Also it's not possible to rollback to older ClickHouse version after executing `ALTER ... ATTACH` query in new version.
2021-03-03T14:14:28
2021-03-03T14:14:28
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,772,432
18,610
filimonov
> Ah, right. Though something was the reason of > > > DB::Exception: Cannot parse input: expected 'quorum: ' before: 'merge_type: 2\n' > > some structure somewhere must have changed so those versions were incompatible. Caused by https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/pull/14490/
2021-03-03T14:55:49
2021-03-03T14:55:49
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,794,599
21,376
pumelo
@excitoon how can I get more detailed log?
2021-03-03T15:23:32
2021-03-03T15:23:32
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,953,423
21,403
den-crane
```sql SELECT co, arraySlice(arrayReverseSort(i -> (i.2), groupArray((id, v))), 1, 2) FROM ( SELECT id, vv.1 AS co, vv.2 AS v FROM ( SELECT id, arrayJoin([('v1', v1), ('v2', v2), ('v3', v3)]) AS vv FROM ( ...
2021-03-03T18:21:03
2021-03-03T18:21:03
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,288,285
21,358
alexey-milovidov
@amosbird We already have it, the function is named `identity`. This function does nothing and returns its argument, but it inhibits index analysis: ``` SELECT ... WHERE identity(x = 1) ```
2021-03-02T23:07:09
2021-03-02T23:07:09
{ "+1": 1 }
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,363,114
21,388
alexey-milovidov
The fix is probably just to obtain a global context in dictionaries.
2021-03-03T01:51:22
2021-03-03T01:51:22
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,387,357
21,329
depressed-pho
> Please take a look at the reports of fuzzers. Yes, it was an actual bug in my code. It should be fixed now.
2021-03-03T02:52:20
2021-03-03T02:52:20
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,453,162
21,389
filimonov
W/o: this way will work: ```sql CREATE TABLE y2 AS x ENGINE = MergeTree ORDER BY number SETTINGS index_granularity = 1 ``` In your example, it was parsed as query level not a table-level settings. There are also similar usability issues with ```sql INSERT ... SELECT ... SETTINGS ... -- SETTINGS affec...
2021-03-03T05:47:57
2021-03-03T05:47:57
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,493,990
21,334
alesapin
`test_distributed_ddl` -- broken in master
2021-03-03T07:12:19
2021-03-03T07:12:19
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,854,316
21,101
asafcombo
@den-crane apologies I am trying to replicate a complex table and didn't overview the queries. The below will work: ``` CREATE TABLE ip_test ( `timestamp` DateTime Codec (DoubleDelta, LZ4), `ip` String CODEC (LZ4), `is_ipv6` ...
2021-03-03T16:36:30
2021-03-03T16:36:30
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,033,211
21,395
filimonov
> if (!is_leader) return; It can happen if you use special setting which forbids for some replicas to be leaders.
2021-03-03T20:28:00
2021-03-03T20:28:00
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,256,726
21,395
Sallery-X
> > if (!is_leader) return; > > It can happen if you use special setting which forbids for some replicas to be leaders. But I check the zookeeper log found that almost only one replica put the merge task! my cluster is 1 shard 15 replicas
2021-03-04T03:19:06
2021-03-04T03:19:06
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,311,423
19,673
azat
>Integration tests (thread) — fail: 2, passed: 1149, error: 1 Test failures looks unrelated (and those tests are flaky) >Performance — 7 errors, 7 faster, 1 slower, 53 unstable Same issue in upstream/master > Marker check Pending — Waiting to start Functional stateful tests (release, DatabaseOrdinary), Func...
2021-03-04T05:46:27
2021-03-04T05:46:27
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,350,287
19,229
alexey-milovidov
Sometimes we see limited scaling for the following reasons: 1. The working set of data in every thread is larger than L2 cache size, and for all threads it is larger than L3 cache size, and the bottleneck is in memory bandwidth. Possible solution: lower `max_block_size` or `preferred_block_size_bytes`, lower `max_c...
2021-03-03T01:18:44
2021-03-03T01:19:58
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,403,988
20,463
amosbird
Superceded by https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/21364
2021-03-03T03:40:02
2021-03-03T03:40:02
{}
COLLABORATOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,834,164
21,415
gpmcadam
I'm running macOS as the host, but the target is Ubuntu ARM64.
2021-03-03T16:17:09
2021-03-03T16:17:09
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,369,424
21,402
mjh568412187
hello yhyc-clickhouse-05 :) select count(*) from system.parts; SELECT count(*) FROM system.parts ┌─count()─┐ │ 136622 │ └─────────┘ 1 rows in set. Elapsed: 4.690 sec. Processed 68.31 thousand rows, 35.01 MB (14.57 thousand rows/s., 7.47 MB/s.) At that time, the log of clickhouse-server.log_bak202102...
2021-03-04T06:55:28
2021-03-04T06:55:28
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,275,582
11,003
sag1
Good, but I found latest version as 20.12.8.5 on docker hub `docker pull yandex/clickhouse-server:20.12.8.5-alpine` Where is hosted version 21.2?
2021-03-02T22:39:30
2021-03-02T22:42:25
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,573,475
21,067
adrian17
For the record, after some experimenting I found out that even without `WITH`, adding `JOIN`s appears to slowly but quadratically increase query planning time - with 12 identical nontrivial subquery JOINs I got planning time ~1s, with 20 JOINs it reached >4s. But while this was an artificial edge case, apparently addin...
2021-03-03T09:30:45
2021-03-03T09:30:45
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,603,474
21,406
hexiaoting
I will try to fix this.
2021-03-03T10:18:44
2021-03-03T10:18:44
{ "+1": 2 }
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,705,161
21,415
filimonov
Duplicate of https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/21191
2021-03-03T13:13:24
2021-03-03T13:13:24
{ "-1": 1 }
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,707,039
21,415
gpmcadam
To clarify, this is not building on macOS but on arm64 in Docker/Linux, so I don’t think its a duplicate as described
2021-03-03T13:16:46
2021-03-03T13:16:46
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,822,665
21,101
den-crane
``` CREATE TABLE ip_test ( `timestamp` DateTime CODEC(DoubleDelta, LZ4), `ip` String CODEC(LZ4), `is_ipv6` UInt8 MATERIALIZED isIPv6String(ip), `as_name` LowCardinality(String) MATERIALIZED dictGet('tests.ip_prefix_dict', 'as_name', tuple(if(is_ipv6, toIPv6(ip), toIPv4(ip)))) ) ENGINE = MergeTre...
2021-03-03T16:01:29
2021-03-03T16:01:29
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,937,757
21,413
den-crane
Do you use Engine=Merge / Engine=Distributed? Try to replace WHERE with PREWHERE in your test-case. https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/6143 20.3 -- support ends by the end of March.
2021-03-03T17:58:14
2021-03-03T17:58:34
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,230,012
21,362
hssrs
I solved the problem and came back here to share my solution. @nikitamikhaylov, Thank you for your help :) The problem is caused by network. If you have a proxy configured for Docker as I do, It may help to change the proxy or simply pull the images manually (You can find the required image from `$ClickHouse/docker/t...
2021-03-04T02:13:07
2021-03-04T02:13:07
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,404,165
21,246
ucasfl
I think this pr should be backport, it fixed some union related problems. @KochetovNicolai @alexey-milovidov
2021-03-03T03:40:41
2021-03-03T03:40:41
{}
COLLABORATOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,572,802
11,003
sag1
Great ! Thanks @alexey-milovidov
2021-03-03T09:29:41
2021-03-03T09:29:41
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,589,861
13,757
qoega
Still flaky https://clickhouse-test-reports.s3.yandex.net/0/bd7b540b8255475ad584e814a8eeeb1386645fda/functional_stateless_tests_(release).html#fail1
2021-03-03T09:57:16
2021-03-03T09:57:16
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,770,887
21,101
asafcombo
@filimonov can you reopen? reproduced in `21.2.4.6` trace ``` . DB::FunctionDictHelper::getDictionaryStructure(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&) const @ 0xa4030b3 in /usr/bin/clickhouse1. DB::FunctionDictGetNoType<(DB::DictionaryGetFunctionType)0>::ge...
2021-03-03T14:53:51
2021-03-03T14:54:37
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,771,933
18,609
filimonov
Caused by https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/pull/14490/
2021-03-03T14:55:10
2021-03-03T14:55:10
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,052,006
21,433
azat
>But why it will print DB::Exception instead of DB::ParsingException ? I guess because it catches only Exception, not ParsingException, for example here - https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/blob/e8df9971f14880729fe20336388ea09e4dc44712/src/Server/TCPHandler.cpp#L327 First it prints ParsingException and afte...
2021-03-03T21:01:30
2021-03-03T21:01:30
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,495,410
21,334
alesapin
Performance -- no visible changes.
2021-03-03T07:14:43
2021-03-03T07:14:43
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,035,711
19,673
azat
Rebased again (to fix constant conflicts in ErrorCodes)
2021-03-03T20:32:17
2021-03-03T20:32:17
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,046,221
21,433
nikitamikhaylov
But why it will print DB::Exception instead of DB::ParsingException ?
2021-03-03T20:51:08
2021-03-03T20:51:08
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,266,904
11,003
alexey-milovidov
It should be already available since version 21.2.
2021-03-02T22:29:43
2021-03-02T22:29:43
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,284,044
21,329
alexey-milovidov
``` WITH CAST('127.0.0.1', 'Nullable(String)') AS addr, arrayJoin([NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL]) AS prefix SELECT '1\07.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/81\07.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8127.0.0.0/8', isIPAdd...
2021-03-02T22:57:32
2021-03-02T22:57:32
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,288,946
21,103
alexey-milovidov
Q: How to remove TTL in ClickHouse version 20.8? A: It takes two steps. Step 1: Upgrade to ClickHouse version 21.2 or newer. Step 2: Remove TTL with ALTER TABLE ... REMOVE TTL query.
2021-03-02T23:08:33
2021-03-02T23:09:27
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,339,540
11,003
alexey-milovidov
I checked, it's alright: `docker run --rm --network=host yandex/clickhouse-server:latest` downloads version 21.2.5 - the latest stable release with all patches.
2021-03-03T00:54:58
2021-03-03T00:55:05
{ "+1": 1 }
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,376,951
21,358
amosbird
Then I guess it's better to just use `identity` to ignore certain skip indices manually @mzealey
2021-03-03T02:25:08
2021-03-03T02:25:08
{}
COLLABORATOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,515,199
21,395
filimonov
Why do you think you need it? Since 20.5 all replicas are leaders (unless you explicitly forbid them to be a leader). If you're using an older version there was a code for that (but it was quite fragile)
2021-03-03T07:52:06
2021-03-03T07:53:45
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,273,636
9,596
alexey-milovidov
Also it's a good idea to use `ColumnUnique` to implement generic version of function `transform`. We can convert source array elements to ColumnUnique to represent them as a dictionary to offsets in the destination array. Then we will use this dictionary for lookups and copy elements with `IColumn::insertFrom`. ...
2021-03-02T22:35:56
2021-03-02T22:35:56
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,225,453
21,359
haoch
@alexey-milovidov @amosbird Could you please help have a look? We would like to contribute the change but want to align if it's the right direction with community. Basically the code change should not be much but it will help to make `DistributedTable` sharding key feture more generic. Our idea is similar with http...
2021-03-02T21:22:13
2021-03-02T23:00:54
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,304,740
21,359
haoch
@amosbird I see your proposal https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/21364, our approach maybe able to support similar effect but a lightweight solution which we name as `virtual_cluster` bucket distribution mode.
2021-03-02T23:43:18
2021-03-02T23:44:14
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,896,986
21,385
alexey-milovidov
I still have to find how to justify these changes...
2021-03-03T17:10:56
2021-03-03T17:10:56
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,944,673
12,561
alexey-milovidov
Or `evaluateConstantExpressionAsLiteral`.
2021-03-03T18:08:17
2021-03-03T18:08:17
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,318,832
21,390
knoguchi
I figured `WITH <id> AS <subquery expr>` is a different beast than `WITH <expression> AS <identifier>` altho the two share same syntax.
2021-03-03T00:16:40
2021-03-03T00:17:00
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,629,481
21,361
filimonov
Please post an update after version upgrade
2021-03-03T11:01:17
2021-03-03T11:01:17
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,853,135
18,978
myrrc
So we decided to leave this ticket (and the corresponding RESTORE REPLICA) as a backward incompatible change, I'll update the description and the docs shortly.
2021-03-03T16:34:49
2021-03-03T16:34:49
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,352,915
14,700
alexey-milovidov
Still relevant.
2021-03-03T01:25:23
2021-03-03T01:25:23
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,353,984
15,469
alexey-milovidov
Yes, it works perfectly in all recent releases.
2021-03-03T01:27:06
2021-03-03T01:27:06
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,457,532
21,364
filimonov
Can you extend it a bit / explain usecases better? What tasks will be better solved using that approach (comparing to existing engine=Distributed)? In that approach, user should know names of the servers/endpoints when creating tables. And schema is tightly coupled with the current cluster. For example that will le...
2021-03-03T05:57:10
2021-03-03T05:57:10
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,524,519
21,348
kitaisreal
Hello, @MaxJPowers, could you please provide some example. Hit rate is calculated for rows in cache dictionaries.
2021-03-03T08:10:01
2021-03-03T08:10:01
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,771,843
17,183
filimonov
Caused by https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/pull/14490/
2021-03-03T14:55:04
2021-03-03T14:55:04
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,961,723
21,402
den-crane
>local_ods.ods_order_db__t_trade_order_item: Renaming unexpected part .... to ignored_.... This is normal behavior. >The set of parts restored in place of ... looks incomplete. There might or might not be a data loss. Suspicious parts This is data loss because of power outage (linux cache was not written to ...
2021-03-03T18:33:08
2021-03-03T18:33:08
{ "+1": 1 }
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,191,763
15,486
alexey-milovidov
We decided to limit the range with minimum year 1925 for now.
2021-03-04T00:40:41
2021-03-04T00:40:41
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,274,463
14,740
alexey-milovidov
I will add your test just in case.
2021-03-02T22:37:19
2021-03-02T22:37:19
{ "+1": 1 }
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,340,336
21,359
yiguolei
@haoch I am very interested into the bucket mode. But I have some questions: 1. how to rebalance data when new node is added to the cluster? 2. Is user's data in different bucket on the same shard stored in the same local table? 3. Maybe there will be many entries since the bucket is at user level, am I right?
2021-03-03T00:56:58
2021-03-03T00:56:58
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,551,429
21,395
Sallery-X
> Why do you think you need it? Since 20.5 all replicas are leaders (unless you explicitly forbid them to be a leader). > > If you're using an older version there was a code for that (but it was quite fragile) If all replicas are leaders,every replica could excute merge plan, the parts that will be merged may...
2021-03-03T08:57:09
2021-03-03T08:57:09
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,733,801
21,385
alexey-milovidov
There is no visible difference in performance test: https://clickhouse-test-reports.s3.yandex.net/21385/aecdadd02e7921ce5cd06614cd94ca5798b92d60/performance_comparison/report.html#fail1
2021-03-03T14:00:02
2021-03-03T14:00:02
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,830,340
21,415
den-crane
@gpmcadam So you cross-compiled on arm64 in Docker/Linux for arm64 macOS as the target?
2021-03-03T16:11:55
2021-03-03T16:11:55
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,956,003
21,404
den-crane
OOM in JAVA on in Clickhouse-server?
2021-03-03T18:24:51
2021-03-03T18:24:51
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,988,418
21,402
alexey-milovidov
> The set of parts restored in place of ... looks incomplete. There might or might not be a data loss. Suspicious parts This is data loss because of power outage (linux cache was not written to disk). If you have replicas unaffected by power outage, the missing data parts will be restored from them.
2021-03-03T19:15:20
2021-03-03T19:15:20
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,269,147
20,182
alexey-milovidov
#9404 is still in early stage.
2021-03-04T03:52:10
2021-03-04T03:52:10
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,283,689
21,329
alexey-milovidov
Please take a look at the reports of fuzzers.
2021-03-02T22:56:46
2021-03-02T22:56:46
{ "eyes": 1 }
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,338,980
11,003
alexey-milovidov
21.2 is in the list: https://hub.docker.com/r/yandex/clickhouse-server/tags?page=1&ordering=last_updated I have no idea why latest points to some other version.
2021-03-03T00:53:24
2021-03-03T00:53:24
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,626,240
20,608
filimonov
@Exus any news here?
2021-03-03T10:56:01
2021-03-03T10:56:01
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,702,600
9,900
Avogar
Fixed in https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/pull/19291.
2021-03-03T13:09:06
2021-03-03T13:09:06
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,721,695
18,978
myrrc
> Possibly we should change Changelog category to "Backward incompatible" and add a note that ATTACH PART[ITION] queries may not work during cluster upgrade. @tavplubix The proposed solution doesn't change the way the replicas process the commands if the data in detached/ is missing, I don't see the reason why it ma...
2021-03-03T13:41:34
2021-03-03T13:42:39
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,852,251
21,415
den-crane
Ah, OK. It's not related to MacOS at all but CPU is arm64 (Apple M1).
2021-03-03T16:33:44
2021-03-03T16:33:44
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
789,868,725
21,101
den-crane
yes, I reproduced on 21.3 ``` <Error> Application: DB::Exception: Dictionary `tests.ip_prefix_dict` not found: While processing cast(if(NOT (cast(if(ip LIKE '%:%', 1, 0) ``` BTW you can use `dictGetString` instead of `dictGet` -- works for me
2021-03-03T16:46:30
2021-03-03T16:46:30
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
790,226,659
21,331
godliness
@nikitamikhaylov Seems like **Marker check** is pending.
2021-03-04T02:04:56
2021-03-04T02:04:56
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
780,413,963
16,193
tavplubix
Fuzzers - unrelated Integration tests (thread) - test_storage_kafka - flacky test, unrelated Functional stateless tests flaky check (address) - 01541_max_memory_usage_for_user - `Long test not marked as 'long'` - Looks like an issue with flacky check. Test time in flacky check is about 190 seconds, so it's considered...
2021-02-17T09:10:51
2021-02-17T09:10:51
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
780,454,297
19,766
vdimir
@achimbab Sorry for long delay. Thank you for your PR! First of all, I think that we need more details in description, about terminology and what do we call `event` and `chain`, how do we consider data in table (some special form of graph I suppose), maybe add some links to external resources about this concepts. ...
2021-02-17T10:20:09
2021-02-17T10:20:09
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
780,575,861
20,585
alesapin
No reconnects, no errors with ZK... why fast test fails https://gist.github.com/alesapin/6293fdb422961968c530cc34e8a9d926? https://clickhouse-test-reports.s3.yandex.net/20585/9396bae2e2051e2d50faa0d8c1005465171db481/fast_test.html#fail1
2021-02-17T14:01:02
2021-02-17T14:01:26
{}
MEMBER