owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,016,640 | 88,822 | coenttb | Live reproducer in production CI on `swift-primitives/swift-tagged-primitives`:
https://github.com/swift-primitives/swift-tagged-primitives/actions/runs/25394661323
Same assertion fires on Swift 6.3.1-release (Windows) and Swift 6.4-dev nightly (Linux), both compiling under `-enable-upcoming-feature InternalImportsByD... | 2026-05-05T18:39:42 | 2026-05-05T18:39:42 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,385,312,808 | 88,850 | xavgru12 | Rebase this, make commits for each file and collect them in one PR as xedin suggested | 2026-05-06T05:15:24 | 2026-05-06T05:15:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,379,703,945 | 79,176 | al45tair | I think we should probably close this, as I don't think it likely that anyone has any plans to do anything with it. If someone wanted to change the meaning of the above import statements, that would need to go through Swift Evolution and there would probably need to be a new language mode as well. | 2026-05-05T13:28:32 | 2026-05-05T13:28:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,379,889,063 | 88,733 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-05T13:49:18 | 2026-05-05T13:49:18 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,372,326 | 88,781 | egorzhdan | @xtremekforever is correct, this is already fixed in https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/88521 and the fix is scheduled to be shipped in 6.3.2 release. | 2026-05-05T14:45:05 | 2026-05-05T14:45:05 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,459,670 | 88,731 | mattmassicotte | I agree that if the last release of Xcode 26 ends up contains this bug it will hurt the adoption of `NonisolatedNonsendingByDefault` | 2026-05-05T14:55:41 | 2026-05-05T14:55:41 | {
"+1": 2
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,787,252 | 88,831 | Snowy1803 | It is when a Swift file is first compiled and output to SIL, then it is compiled as if the source file was this intermediate SIL code. In the debugger, it will step through SIL instructions instead of the original Swift code.
According to DebuggingTheCompiler.md, it is used for profiling the standard library. | 2026-05-05T15:38:48 | 2026-05-05T15:38:48 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,384,633,282 | 88,828 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-06T02:22:04 | 2026-05-06T02:22:04 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,384,879,831 | 88,813 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-06T03:37:43 | 2026-05-06T03:37:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,379,744,772 | 75,354 | daveinglis | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-build/pull/1251
@swift-ci test | 2026-05-05T13:33:04 | 2026-05-05T13:33:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,379,745,734 | 88,683 | egorzhdan | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-05T13:33:09 | 2026-05-05T13:33:09 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,325,403 | 88,759 | gottesmm | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-05T16:56:01 | 2026-05-05T16:56:01 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,945,940 | 88,787 | augusto2112 | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/12890
@swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-05T18:30:29 | 2026-05-05T18:30:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,352,295 | 88,829 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test and merge | 2026-05-05T19:29:56 | 2026-05-05T19:29:56 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,383,095,764 | 88,726 | jckarter | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-05T21:14:11 | 2026-05-05T21:14:11 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,384,469,353 | 88,829 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test windows | 2026-05-06T01:38:40 | 2026-05-06T01:38:40 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,386,047,428 | 86,666 | eeckstein | Generic types/functions are in general much slower than non-generic types/functions. It would be interesting if you see the slowdown even if the generic type gets specialized | 2026-05-06T07:47:44 | 2026-05-06T07:47:44 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,662,011 | 88,253 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-05T15:21:45 | 2026-05-05T15:21:45 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,664,407 | 88,801 | xavgru12 | Implemented with #88819.
I suspect there could be more uses of this? | 2026-05-05T15:22:00 | 2026-05-05T15:22:00 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,965,593 | 88,834 | gottesmm | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-05T16:04:43 | 2026-05-05T16:04:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,005,467 | 88,668 | keith | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-05T18:38:10 | 2026-05-05T18:38:10 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,383,685,353 | 88,811 | xedin | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-05T22:40:34 | 2026-05-05T22:40:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,386,064,343 | 88,825 | eeckstein | @swift-ci apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-06T07:50:46 | 2026-05-06T07:50:46 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,379,696,965 | 88,536 | xavgru12 | @AnthonyLatsis | 2026-05-05T13:27:46 | 2026-05-05T13:27:46 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,809,152 | 88,833 | nkcsgexi | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-05T15:41:48 | 2026-05-05T15:41:48 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,889,668 | 88,685 | al45tair | Apparently, the problem here is that the `SWIFT_CONTEXT` argument _must_ be the last argument on architectures that do stack-based parameter passing, which in this case includes Wasm. It works where we're doing register-based parameter passing, because it just causes us to use the context register instead of assigning ... | 2026-05-05T15:53:19 | 2026-05-05T15:53:19 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,050,713 | 88,801 | hectar-glitches | Yes, that was just the first PR | 2026-05-05T16:17:13 | 2026-05-05T16:17:13 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,096,647 | 88,685 | al45tair | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-05T16:22:40 | 2026-05-05T16:22:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,326,726 | 88,736 | gottesmm | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-05T16:56:14 | 2026-05-05T16:56:14 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,383,122,443 | 88,823 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-05T21:17:29 | 2026-05-05T21:17:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,383,766,230 | 88,854 | patrykstefanski | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-05T23:00:01 | 2026-05-05T23:00:01 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,384,873,848 | 88,860 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-06T03:35:42 | 2026-05-06T03:35:42 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,385,134,331 | 88,634 | natecook1000 | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-06T04:41:53 | 2026-05-06T04:41:53 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,386,102,726 | 88,846 | xavgru12 | @swift-ci please test macos | 2026-05-06T07:58:08 | 2026-05-06T07:58:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,227,151 | 88,768 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-05T14:26:27 | 2026-05-05T14:26:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,465,392 | 88,842 | shahmishal | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-05T17:16:01 | 2026-05-05T17:16:01 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,533,897 | 88,843 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-05T17:26:58 | 2026-05-05T17:26:58 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,642,277 | 88,839 | xedin | This is going to collide with https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/88811 | 2026-05-05T17:43:20 | 2026-05-05T17:43:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,001,482 | 88,248 | elsakeirouz | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-05T18:37:37 | 2026-05-05T18:37:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,383,707,043 | 88,697 | patrykstefanski | @swift-ci Please Test Source Compatibility | 2026-05-05T22:45:48 | 2026-05-05T22:45:48 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,384,204,222 | 88,859 | meg-gupta | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-06T00:25:42 | 2026-05-06T00:25:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,847,350 | 88,801 | xedin | Yes, there are definitely more uses of this left :) | 2026-05-05T15:47:03 | 2026-05-05T15:47:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,023,613 | 88,831 | adrian-prantl | > What is "SIL-based debuginfo"?
This is a mode used by compiler developers to get textual SIL-based debug info. It allows you to look at the performance profile of textual SIL instructions rather than source code. | 2026-05-05T16:13:12 | 2026-05-05T16:13:12 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,267,718 | 88,836 | xavgru12 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-05T16:48:17 | 2026-05-05T16:48:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,566,565 | 88,501 | jamieQ | closing in favor of https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/88730 | 2026-05-05T17:32:15 | 2026-05-05T17:32:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,020,767 | 87,136 | coenttb | The minimal repro above also reproduces in real-world CI on `swift-primitives/swift-tagged-primitives`:
https://github.com/swift-primitives/swift-tagged-primitives/actions/runs/25394661323
Same assertion at `MoveOnlyAddressCheckerUtils.cpp:1829`, hits identically on Swift 6.3.1-release (Windows) and Swift 6.4-dev nigh... | 2026-05-05T18:40:15 | 2026-05-05T18:40:15 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,382,549 | 88,668 | cachemeifyoucan | > I wonder if always returning `0` is a deliberate design choice. cc: @artemcm @cachemeifyoucan
I think this is by design, at least from the beginning. `swift-driver` has a fallback path that invokes `swift-frontend -scan-dependencies`, which kind of expects to always succeed. I think the reason was that dependency ... | 2026-05-05T19:34:27 | 2026-05-05T19:35:16 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,386,356,130 | 86,666 | coenttb | Verified — at `-O` the gap closes. The original numbers were a `-Onone` build (the issue's "To Reproduce" runs `swift build`, which defaults to debug):
| Toolchain | Mode | Raw | Flat (`_read`) | `Nested.Inline` |
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|
| 6.2.3 | `-Onone` | 8.9 ns | 16.3 ns | 68.5 ns (7.67×) |
| 6.2.3 | `-O` | 1.1 n... | 2026-05-06T08:38:56 | 2026-05-06T08:38:56 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,498,061 | 88,777 | azarovalex | @eeckstein thanks for the review! CI seems green so would appreciate if we can land this PR. | 2026-05-05T15:00:34 | 2026-05-05T15:00:46 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,364,614 | 88,811 | xedin | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-05T17:02:23 | 2026-05-05T17:02:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,425,446 | 88,840 | jamieQ | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-05T17:10:13 | 2026-05-05T17:10:13 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,383,834,350 | 88,664 | keith | @swift-ci please test Windows Platform | 2026-05-05T23:15:34 | 2026-05-05T23:15:34 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,233,003 | 88,726 | jckarter | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-05T16:43:34 | 2026-05-05T16:43:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,502,235 | 88,730 | jamieQ | Note: I think this is generally ready for review, but there are a handful of TODOs that I'd specifically appreciate further feedback on from those more familiar with the code. | 2026-05-05T17:21:50 | 2026-05-05T17:21:50 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,546,314 | 88,833 | nkcsgexi | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-05T17:29:02 | 2026-05-05T17:29:02 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,033,231 | 88,726 | jckarter | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-05T18:41:53 | 2026-05-05T18:41:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,740,386 | 88,813 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test macOS | 2026-05-05T20:24:20 | 2026-05-05T20:24:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,383,080,198 | 88,849 | hectar-glitches | got it | 2026-05-05T21:11:27 | 2026-05-05T21:11:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,386,063,387 | 88,825 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-06T07:50:36 | 2026-05-06T07:50:36 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,909,172 | 88,801 | xavgru12 | Will you continue with this task? @hectar-glitches | 2026-05-05T15:56:13 | 2026-05-05T15:56:13 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,294,028 | 88,771 | azarovalex | Closed in favor of https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/88777 | 2026-05-05T16:51:54 | 2026-05-05T16:51:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,004,787 | 88,664 | keith | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-05T18:38:05 | 2026-05-05T18:38:05 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,930,967 | 88,851 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-05T20:48:58 | 2026-05-05T20:48:58 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,998,735 | 88,836 | xavgru12 | @xedin | 2026-05-05T20:59:21 | 2026-05-05T20:59:21 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,380,552,694 | 88,831 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-05T15:07:55 | 2026-05-05T15:07:55 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,750,276 | 88,597 | patrykstefanski | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-05T17:59:40 | 2026-05-05T17:59:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,815,362 | 87,115 | allevato | swiftlang/swift-syntax#3268
@swift-ci please smoke test Linux platform | 2026-05-05T18:10:08 | 2026-05-05T18:10:08 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,382,946,050 | 88,849 | xedin | @hectar-glitches for the rest of them, let's combine it all in one PR. | 2026-05-05T20:50:33 | 2026-05-05T20:50:33 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,383,336,658 | 88,832 | egorzhdan | @swift-ci please smoke test macOS | 2026-05-05T21:38:03 | 2026-05-05T21:38:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,384,122,615 | 88,858 | meg-gupta | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-06T00:08:19 | 2026-05-06T00:08:19 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,385,307,068 | 88,848 | xavgru12 | Superseded by #88849 | 2026-05-06T05:13:52 | 2026-05-06T05:13:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,654,216 | 88,832 | egorzhdan | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-05T17:44:59 | 2026-05-05T17:44:59 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,381,661,262 | 88,273 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test macos | 2026-05-05T17:45:57 | 2026-05-05T17:45:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,383,952,469 | 88,847 | meg-gupta | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-05T23:32:31 | 2026-05-05T23:32:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,385,114,091 | 88,861 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-06T04:36:57 | 2026-05-06T04:36:57 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,297,893,649 | 88,175 | broken-circle | Opened #88827. | 2026-04-22T16:08:13 | 2026-05-06T23:01:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,392,990,259 | 88,783 | meg-gupta | @jamieQ Thanks for your comments. I am not planning to merge this as-is. InstructionIndices can overflow when blocks and we'll need to keep the slow path around in that case. https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/88774 regained all the benefits this change introduced anyway for a specific test for now.
| 2026-05-06T23:39:31 | 2026-05-06T23:44:13 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,394,571,505 | 88,794 | eeckstein | I could not reproduce the problem | 2026-05-07T06:18:15 | 2026-05-07T06:18:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,396,483,893 | 88,872 | kathygray-pl | Yeah for test improvement | 2026-05-07T10:55:51 | 2026-05-07T10:55:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,396,699,644 | 88,641 | kathygray-pl | My other PR #88776 is also relevant | 2026-05-07T11:28:41 | 2026-05-07T11:28:41 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,396,956,975 | 87,115 | allevato | I think I see what looks like a non-flaky test failure digging through the logs, in swiftpm I think:
```
[2026-05-06T22:00:07.326Z] ◇ Test case passing 2 arguments buildSystem → .native, testData → MigrateCommandTestData(featureName: "ExistentialAny", expectedSummary: "Applied 5 fix-its in 1 file") to migrateComman... | 2026-05-07T12:08:20 | 2026-05-07T12:08:20 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,397,000,949 | 88,886 | tshortli | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/12912
@swift-ci please test macOS | 2026-05-07T12:14:55 | 2026-05-07T12:14:55 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,392,871,788 | 88,897 | duow310 | > Let's use ${Python3_EXECUTABLE}
Pushed an update to do that | 2026-05-06T23:09:39 | 2026-05-06T23:09:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,392,901,808 | 88,899 | nkcsgexi | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-06T23:17:02 | 2026-05-06T23:17:02 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,396,458,539 | 88,872 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-07T10:51:52 | 2026-05-07T10:51:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,398,229,133 | 57,904 | marcomasser | FYI: This issue is still there in Swift 6.3.2. | 2026-05-07T14:55:27 | 2026-05-07T14:55:27 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,398,303,847 | 88,918 | kovdan01 | @swift-ci Please test macOS platform | 2026-05-07T15:04:40 | 2026-05-07T15:04:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,398,307,948 | 88,920 | kovdan01 | Tagging @asl @JaapWijnen | 2026-05-07T15:05:09 | 2026-05-07T15:05:09 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,392,827,575 | 88,775 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-06T23:00:07 | 2026-05-06T23:00:07 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,394,190,801 | 88,864 | hnrklssn | Reproduced in a recent snapshot. Stack trace indicates it crashes in `swift::irgen::IRGenerator::emitLazyDefinitions()`, which is quite late in the pipeline... I'll debug a bit more and see what I can find. | 2026-05-07T04:36:41 | 2026-05-07T04:36:41 | {
"+1": 1
} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,394,221,400 | 88,825 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-07T04:46:12 | 2026-05-07T04:46:12 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,392,819,675 | 88,851 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test macOS platform | 2026-05-06T22:58:35 | 2026-05-06T22:58:35 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,392,856,760 | 88,880 | rauhul | I'm not seeing the behavior you describe:
```sh
$ swiftc -I . foo.swift
foo.swift:4:21: error: cannot convert value of type 'UnsafeBufferPointer<Element>' to expected argument type 'UnsafePointer<Element>'
2 |
3 | func foo(_ inputs: UnsafeBufferPointer<Element>, _ outputs: UnsafeMutableBufferPointer<Element>) {
4 | ... | 2026-05-06T23:06:00 | 2026-05-06T23:06:00 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,393,420,927 | 88,742 | hnrklssn | Thank you for the bug report, @ephemer! Are you able to install a main snapshot (https://www.swift.org/install/macos/) and reproduce it using the latest version also?
CC @egorzhdan | 2026-05-07T01:31:11 | 2026-05-07T01:31:11 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,394,397,005 | 88,880 | rauhul | @hnrklssn ah yes `-enable-experimental-feature SafeInteropWrappers` does make the imported api from swiftc use buffer pointers, though I'm not really sure thats the ideal behavior. It seems like you _might_ want an `Unsafe[Mutable]Pointer<InlineArray<N, T>>` | 2026-05-07T05:39:38 | 2026-05-07T05:39:38 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,394,589,575 | 88,904 | hnrklssn | Just because I'm curious: is there a reason for diagnosing this in IRGen rather than the frontend? | 2026-05-07T06:20:53 | 2026-05-07T06:20:53 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,397,004,182 | 88,894 | tshortli | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/12912
@swift-ci please smoke test macOS | 2026-05-07T12:15:24 | 2026-05-07T12:15:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,397,009,186 | 88,894 | tshortli | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/12912
@swift-ci please smoke test Linux | 2026-05-07T12:16:07 | 2026-05-07T12:16:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,392,986,187 | 88,900 | lorentey | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-06T23:38:22 | 2026-05-06T23:38:22 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,393,070,852 | 88,342 | Catfish-Man | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-07T00:01:01 | 2026-05-07T00:01:01 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.