owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
swiftlang | swift | 4,521,403,772 | 89,181 | mikeash | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-22T17:52:31 | 2026-05-22T17:52:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,522,225,421 | 89,208 | gottesmm | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-22T19:44:08 | 2026-05-22T19:44:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,522,691,039 | 89,371 | finagolfin | @swift-ci Build Toolchain Amazon Linux 2 | 2026-05-22T21:05:42 | 2026-05-22T21:05:42 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,523,426,148 | 89,382 | hnrklssn | Could you add a swift-ide-test test showing the imported module interface before and after your change? | 2026-05-22T23:59:08 | 2026-05-22T23:59:08 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,525,784,575 | 89,369 | finagolfin | While LTS NDK 30 beta 1 stopped this test crashing, it still doesn't pass elsewhere for Android AArch64, ie more change will be required. | 2026-05-23T15:19:15 | 2026-05-23T15:19:15 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,521,337,690 | 89,369 | finagolfin | Just added by @kavon in #88820, [test failure](https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-package-swift-sdk-for-android/473/console) could be related to existing arm64e issue listed there already or the lld in NDK 28. I'll try the NDK 30 beta and update this later. | 2026-05-22T17:45:09 | 2026-05-22T17:46:26 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,522,860,671 | 89,379 | a-viv-a | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-22T21:36:57 | 2026-05-22T21:36:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,523,533,897 | 89,369 | finagolfin | @swift-ci test android | 2026-05-23T00:31:19 | 2026-05-23T00:31:19 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,523,705,405 | 88,094 | glessard | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-23T01:22:24 | 2026-05-23T01:22:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,523,928,825 | 44,137 | JetForMe | > I'm not convinced this is an "obvious bug". We deliberately put in checking for this even whene there is plenty of context because we didn't want people to _accidentally_ ignore parameters. Maybe the compromise is to remove that check for single-expression closures?
I wouldn't. I just wrote this code (part of a larg... | 2026-05-23T02:40:22 | 2026-05-23T02:40:58 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,524,238,012 | 89,360 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test macos | 2026-05-23T05:09:08 | 2026-05-23T05:09:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,526,183,935 | 88,775 | compnerd | Please test with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13046
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/524
@swift-ci please build toolchain Windows platform | 2026-05-23T18:19:53 | 2026-05-23T18:19:53 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,522,436,345 | 89,370 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-22T20:15:46 | 2026-05-22T20:15:46 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,523,561,510 | 87,985 | finagolfin | Unrelated CI run again
swiftlang/swift-testing#1381
@swift-ci test android | 2026-05-23T00:40:39 | 2026-05-23T00:40:39 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,524,160,484 | 89,239 | Jiaxu-Li | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-23T04:31:14 | 2026-05-23T04:31:14 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,526,147,771 | 89,390 | finagolfin | @aidan-hall or @atrick, let me know what you think.
@swift-ci test android | 2026-05-23T18:03:02 | 2026-05-23T18:03:02 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,526,148,684 | 89,201 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-23T18:03:28 | 2026-05-23T18:03:28 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,522,581,126 | 89,378 | glessard | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-22T20:44:00 | 2026-05-22T20:44:00 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,523,655,364 | 89,385 | glessard | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-23T01:13:25 | 2026-05-23T01:13:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,526,757,405 | 89,329 | patrykstefanski | @swift-ci please test macos platform | 2026-05-23T23:03:35 | 2026-05-23T23:03:35 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,521,507,693 | 86,848 | justice-adams-apple | apple/llvm-project#13048
@swift-ci Please test Android | 2026-05-22T18:04:26 | 2026-05-22T18:04:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,521,617,368 | 89,309 | adrian-prantl | > It seems this is already fixed in upstream clang. [llvm/llvm-project#169653](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169653) from last year
Nice. What I propose to do then is to commit this here, revert it on `next`, and cherry-pick it to `release/6.4.x`. | 2026-05-22T18:17:38 | 2026-05-22T18:17:38 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,521,888,517 | 89,226 | a-viv-a | This doesn't reproduce for me on 6.4, I think this was fixed by https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/88453. Unless we are convinced this should not compile, in which case I regressed this 😅 | 2026-05-22T18:51:37 | 2026-05-22T18:51:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,522,055,592 | 89,371 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please test amazon linux 2 | 2026-05-22T19:18:52 | 2026-05-22T19:18:52 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,522,231,975 | 89,369 | finagolfin | @swift-ci test android | 2026-05-22T19:45:20 | 2026-05-22T19:45:20 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,522,694,543 | 89,371 | finagolfin | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-22T21:06:23 | 2026-05-22T21:06:23 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,524,064,587 | 89,376 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please test macos platform | 2026-05-23T03:45:15 | 2026-05-23T03:45:15 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,524,508,945 | 89,339 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-23T07:00:05 | 2026-05-23T07:00:05 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,522,054,581 | 89,371 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-22T19:18:40 | 2026-05-22T19:18:40 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,522,400,770 | 89,375 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-22T20:09:25 | 2026-05-22T20:09:25 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,523,558,691 | 87,985 | finagolfin | @swift-ci build toolchain windows | 2026-05-23T00:39:49 | 2026-05-23T00:39:49 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,523,560,945 | 89,358 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test macOS platform | 2026-05-23T00:40:30 | 2026-05-23T00:40:30 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,524,616,998 | 89,388 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-23T07:27:56 | 2026-05-23T07:27:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,526,348,491 | 89,385 | glessard | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-23T19:39:16 | 2026-05-23T19:39:16 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,502,818,337 | 89,305 | augusto2112 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-20T21:32:28 | 2026-05-20T21:32:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,776,940 | 89,308 | kavon | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-21T00:38:40 | 2026-05-21T00:38:40 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,508,438,943 | 88,465 | ktoso | Blocked on https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/89320 | 2026-05-21T12:53:19 | 2026-05-21T12:53:19 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,509,588,207 | 89,180 | mikeash | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T15:07:29 | 2026-05-21T15:07:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,510,762,554 | 89,301 | Azoy | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-21T17:17:52 | 2026-05-21T17:17:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,560,402 | 86,083 | xedin | @BenRacicot Remaining fixes landed in 6.3 branch https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89267. | 2026-05-20T23:47:55 | 2026-05-20T23:47:55 | {
"hooray": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,587,828 | 89,308 | tshortli | > There's also no reason to have introduced this as experimental, as we plan to use it right away.
If the attribute is only designed for the stdlib and not meant for general use yet, though, it still makes sense for it to be an experimental feature. While the underscore probably communicates that it's still our gene... | 2026-05-20T23:54:52 | 2026-05-20T23:54:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,855,780 | 89,311 | augusto2112 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-21T00:58:35 | 2026-05-21T00:58:35 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,505,371,992 | 89,314 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T06:24:52 | 2026-05-21T06:24:52 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,505,381,415 | 89,315 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-21T06:26:47 | 2026-05-21T06:26:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,508,320,181 | 89,319 | eeckstein | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-21T12:37:25 | 2026-05-21T12:37:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,510,747,424 | 89,300 | Azoy | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T17:16:19 | 2026-05-21T17:16:19 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,502,956,508 | 89,292 | augusto2112 | @swift-ci smoke test macOS | 2026-05-20T21:54:28 | 2026-05-20T21:54:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,449,607 | 89,307 | qiongsiwu | @swift-ci please test. | 2026-05-20T23:26:21 | 2026-05-20T23:26:21 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,505,236,134 | 89,283 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T06:01:06 | 2026-05-21T06:01:06 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,505,275,100 | 89,310 | atrick | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-21T06:08:05 | 2026-05-21T06:08:05 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,505,462,570 | 89,298 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test windows platform | 2026-05-21T06:41:20 | 2026-05-21T06:41:20 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,512,450,599 | 89,255 | MaxDesiatov | Fixed on main in https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89315, 6.4 in https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89319 | 2026-05-21T20:21:17 | 2026-05-21T20:21:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,505,776,872 | 89,245 | ktoso | @swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-21T07:31:48 | 2026-05-21T07:31:48 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,507,732,110 | 88,914 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-21T11:26:19 | 2026-05-21T11:26:19 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,509,161,748 | 89,287 | carlpeto | Hi @pdshelley ,
thanks for this.
I think possibly the LLVM IR.zip file contains object files rather than LLVM IR (or LLVM bitcode)?
I wondered what you used to build it?
I'm guessing you are using some kind of `swiftc` command?
Could you possibly use `swiftc -emit-ir`? That should give us the LLVM IR. That would be... | 2026-05-21T14:18:32 | 2026-05-21T14:18:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,511,753,352 | 88,920 | kovdan01 | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-21T18:49:11 | 2026-05-21T18:49:11 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,512,350,182 | 88,477 | hamishknight | @alhafram FYI only [members](https://github.com/swiftlang/project-operations/blob/9c50234f28732055ef1ef8503ab8e5b3d5f10bd5/contributing/contributor-ladder.md#member) have permission to trigger CI | 2026-05-21T20:07:05 | 2026-05-21T20:07:05 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,454,241,884 | 89,125 | tshortli | Some test coverage in `test/ASTGen/availability.swift` (and implementation if needed) for SwiftParser-based parsing would be good, too. | 2026-05-14T19:56:29 | 2026-05-20T23:40:17 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,688,018 | 89,309 | adrian-prantl | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-21T00:16:14 | 2026-05-21T00:16:14 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,696,077 | 89,310 | atrick | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-21T00:18:20 | 2026-05-21T00:18:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,504,063,748 | 89,312 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T01:49:59 | 2026-05-21T01:49:59 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,504,063,928 | 89,313 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T01:50:02 | 2026-05-21T01:50:02 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,504,796,201 | 89,289 | eeckstein | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-21T04:23:14 | 2026-05-21T04:23:14 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,505,389,366 | 89,286 | eeckstein | Sorry, my suggested fix is not correct. I've created a new PR with the correct fix and another fix for a related problem: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89315 | 2026-05-21T06:28:24 | 2026-05-21T06:28:24 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,507,736,505 | 88,914 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci benchmark | 2026-05-21T11:26:57 | 2026-05-21T11:26:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,509,940,135 | 89,293 | kathygray-pl |
> On 21 May 2026, at 16:31, Pavel Yaskevich ***@***.***> wrote:
>
>
> @xedin commented on this pull request.
>
> In lib/Sema/CSDiagnostics.h <https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89293#discussion_r3282369008>:
>
> > @@ -2225,15 +2225,17 @@ class ExpandArrayIntoVarargsFailure final : public ContextualF... | 2026-05-21T15:45:51 | 2026-05-21T15:45:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,512,061,991 | 89,330 | mikeash | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T19:26:12 | 2026-05-21T19:26:12 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,505,382,746 | 89,315 | eeckstein | @swift-ci apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-21T06:27:04 | 2026-05-21T06:27:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,510,331,925 | 89,137 | slavapestov | Reduced further:
```
struct Foo<T, U> {}
struct Outer<T> {
typealias Inner<U> = Foo<T, U>
}
var x: Outer.Inner<Int> = Foo()
```
This is invalid, but you can imagine that if Foo.init took arguments it would be fine to write something like this. Type resolution doesn't represent things properly here. | 2026-05-21T16:24:44 | 2026-05-21T16:24:44 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,507,731,714 | 88,914 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-21T11:26:15 | 2026-05-21T11:26:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,507,752,931 | 89,318 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-21T11:29:26 | 2026-05-21T11:29:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,508,397,120 | 89,155 | ktoso | The real issue is https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/89320 | 2026-05-21T12:47:51 | 2026-05-21T12:47:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,509,376,403 | 88,914 | aidan-hall | This causes a *regression* in the example in issue #82000:
Without this change, the `testDirect` function can fold down to returning a constant, but with this change it cannot. | 2026-05-21T14:43:07 | 2026-05-21T14:43:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,510,428,959 | 89,299 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T16:37:07 | 2026-05-21T16:37:07 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,510,609,574 | 88,914 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-21T17:00:59 | 2026-05-21T17:00:59 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,510,610,153 | 88,914 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-21T17:01:03 | 2026-05-21T17:01:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,512,189,863 | 88,826 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-21T19:44:47 | 2026-05-21T19:44:47 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,502,743,996 | 89,304 | meg-gupta | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-20T21:21:36 | 2026-05-20T21:21:36 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,044,653 | 88,775 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-20T22:10:25 | 2026-05-20T22:10:25 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,643,061 | 89,274 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/7334
@swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T00:06:17 | 2026-05-21T00:06:17 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,504,731,073 | 89,290 | ktoso | Thanks, my bad missing those 🙏 | 2026-05-21T04:12:10 | 2026-05-21T04:12:10 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,507,612,837 | 88,868 | charles-zablit | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T11:12:42 | 2026-05-21T11:12:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,509,464,839 | 89,311 | augusto2112 | @swift-ci smoke test Windows | 2026-05-21T14:53:17 | 2026-05-21T14:53:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,510,475,581 | 89,287 | carlpeto | ^^ I realised you're building with a Makefile. I'm a bit suspicious of this line...
`$(SWIFTC) $(SWIFT_FLAGS) -emit-ir -Xfrontend -disable-llvm-optzns -c $(SWIFT_SRCS) -o $(BUILD_DIR)/swift.ll`
I think it should either have `-emit-ir` or `-c` not both. How about remove the `-c` and try again? To check, when you build ... | 2026-05-21T16:43:37 | 2026-05-21T16:43:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,438,381 | 89,307 | qiongsiwu | > if you have two driver invocations to the build system
Could you help me understand how we can have two driver invocations to the build system that conflict with each other? I thought the driver invocations are independent of each other. | 2026-05-20T23:23:57 | 2026-05-20T23:23:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,504,948,190 | 88,775 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-21T04:59:58 | 2026-05-21T04:59:58 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,504,970,111 | 89,305 | augusto2112 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-21T05:05:16 | 2026-05-21T05:05:16 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,506,730,518 | 88,487 | NotTheNHK | @FranzBusch This is the PR that reimplements the unfolding variant. Could you take a look?
P.S. I think we should merge the other PR before this one. But having both ready to merge is probably a good idea. | 2026-05-21T09:28:01 | 2026-05-21T09:28:01 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,508,998,155 | 89,304 | meg-gupta | @swift-ci test windows platform | 2026-05-21T13:59:32 | 2026-05-21T13:59:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,511,570,400 | 89,313 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test macos platform | 2026-05-21T18:36:03 | 2026-05-21T18:36:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,512,246,296 | 89,332 | rintaro | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-syntax/pull/3340
@swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-21T19:52:12 | 2026-05-21T19:52:12 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,282,402 | 89,307 | qiongsiwu | @swift-ci please smoke test. | 2026-05-20T22:50:15 | 2026-05-20T22:50:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,576,926 | 89,308 | kavon | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-20T23:52:01 | 2026-05-20T23:52:01 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,504,551,559 | 89,310 | atrick | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-21T03:36:24 | 2026-05-21T03:36:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,505,426,101 | 89,316 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T06:34:50 | 2026-05-21T06:34:50 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,508,457,471 | 89,283 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-21T12:55:39 | 2026-05-21T12:55:39 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,510,515,043 | 89,323 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-21T16:48:40 | 2026-05-21T16:48:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,510,536,441 | 88,655 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-21T16:51:37 | 2026-05-21T16:51:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,789,883 | 88,820 | kavon | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-21T00:41:53 | 2026-05-21T00:41:53 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,503,791,973 | 88,820 | kavon | @swift-ci Please Test Source Compatibility | 2026-05-21T00:42:27 | 2026-05-21T00:42:27 | {} | MEMBER |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.