owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vuejs | core | 2,914,492,555 | 13,396 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ------ | ------- | ------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB | 38.4 kB | 34.6 kB |
| vue.global.prod.js | 159 kB | 58.5 kB | 52.2 kB |
### Usages
| Name | Size | G... | 2025-05-28T00:15:35 | 2025-06-07T00:31:26 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,936,206,236 | 13,432 | platon-rov | Wait, I think it's not quite obvious. Let me explain.
You probably mean't that [Boolean Casting](https://vuejs.org/guide/components/props.html#boolean-casting) thing, okay.
Then why we can default boolean with `true` without any warnings? So we can use `<Comp />` and it will use it's inner default to `true`, but onc... | 2025-06-03T16:23:42 | 2025-06-03T16:26:12 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,888,402,031 | 13,345 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/14ace4db-9fb5-4c7a-8b64-b5eb7223c07a)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13345
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-05-17T13:41:41 | 2025-06-04T08:23:02 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,940,268,577 | 12,359 | edison1105 | @julian-di
There's no documentation yet, many core features are still under development.
Try [Playground with this PR](https://deploy-preview-12359--vapor-repl.netlify.app/#eNp9kUFLAzEQhf/KOJdVqF1ET2VbUCmoBxUVvOSybKfb1GwSkmxdWPa/O8nS2kPpKZn33iTfJD3eWzvdtYQzLHzlpA2wK61xC6Flw2uAHhytYYC1Mw1kHM2EFroy2gdofA3z6F9mT6SUgW/j... | 2025-06-04T14:30:06 | 2025-06-04T14:30:06 | {
"heart": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,888,030,364 | 13,343 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/5a86489e-f142-4a57-a489-76c06168d547)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13343
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-05-17T03:40:37 | 2025-06-05T01:34:55 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,942,429,186 | 12,648 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: failure by coderabbit.ai -->
> [!CAUTION]
> ## Review failed
>
> The pull request is closed.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: failure by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->
## Walkthrough
A ne... | 2025-06-05T01:45:10 | 2025-06-05T02:02:15 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,945,179,901 | 12,244 | skirtles-code | @Justineo Good question.
I spent some time going through the history of this. I think the most enlightening was #8929. Long story short, it's for `:deep()` support.
The motivation was Tailwind's use of `:is()`/`:where()`, which it wraps around the selector from the code it's passed.
In Vue 3.5.16 (and other re... | 2025-06-05T16:31:38 | 2025-06-05T16:31:38 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 2,942,827,679 | 13,437 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/3d1cb181-375d-43e2-aa70-8dadd3777281)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13437
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-06-05T05:40:04 | 2025-06-06T00:22:40 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,948,437,406 | 13,442 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------- | ------------------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB (**+31 B**) | 38.4 kB (**+14 B**) | 34.6 kB (**-12 B**) |
| v... | 2025-06-06T08:06:44 | 2025-06-06T09:51:08 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,953,467,219 | 13,445 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/bf53688d-4e7e-4c08-b169-7800ae7848f8)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13445
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-06-08T03:07:57 | 2025-06-08T03:07:57 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,935,369,205 | 13,432 | edison1105 | the `$props.bool` is `false` because of
```js
__name: 'CompWrapper',
props: {
title: { type: String, required: false },
bool: { type: Boolean, required: false },
description: { type: String, required: false, default: 'description' }
},
```
https://vuejs.org/api/component-instance.html#props | 2025-06-03T13:54:06 | 2025-06-03T13:54:06 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,936,182,169 | 13,337 | skirtles-code | I don't think `enter` and `tab` should be added to `keyNames`. That object is specifically used to map aliases, so it shouldn't include any values that map to themselves. That change is adding bytes to the runtime, which shouldn't be necessary for a types change.
As far as I can tell, `enter` and `tab` aren't valid ... | 2025-06-03T16:16:53 | 2025-06-03T16:16:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 2,939,084,659 | 13,345 | edison1105 | LGTM | 2025-06-04T08:22:08 | 2025-06-04T08:22:08 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,947,299,677 | 13,440 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/c6532003-5ab2-4eae-978a-2743f614a5c8)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13440
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-06-06T00:33:07 | 2025-06-06T00:33:07 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,948,991,872 | 12,870 | kadyrleev | > @kadyrleev Thanks for reporting! Could you open an issue with a minimal reproduction case?
Hey, I'll try when time allows. Anyways I was also looking at this one:
https://github.com/vuejs/core/pull/13245 which seems to be a better suspect. | 2025-06-06T11:44:11 | 2025-06-06T11:44:11 | {
"eyes": 1
} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,938,051,698 | 13,433 | edison1105 | see https://github.com/vuejs/core/blob/main/.github/contributing.md
> Code refactors are only accepted if it improves performance, or comes with sufficient explanations on why it objectively improves the code quality (e.g. makes a related feature implementation easier).
Thanks for your contribution. Could you provi... | 2025-06-04T01:56:50 | 2025-06-04T01:56:50 | {
"heart": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,939,446,825 | 13,431 | JonasVon | The current phenomenon is that if a component memory leaks, the entire component tree cannot be destroyed. In the above example, in a large list component (including a large list and a select component), if the select component is triggered, the entire component tree cannot be destroyed, resulting in a surge in DOM Nod... | 2025-06-04T10:17:04 | 2025-06-04T10:17:04 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,942,419,644 | 12,831 | edison1105 | /ecosystem-ci run | 2025-06-05T01:39:26 | 2025-06-05T01:39:26 | {
"+1": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,561,530,474 | 12,607 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------- | ------------------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB (**+40 B**) | 38.4 kB (**+15 B**) | 34.6 kB (**+26 B**) |
| v... | 2024-12-25T01:32:24 | 2025-06-05T02:05:06 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,942,514,475 | 12,804 | edison1105 | /ecosystem-ci run | 2025-06-05T02:10:05 | 2025-06-05T02:10:05 | {
"+1": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,943,632,427 | 12,244 | Justineo | I think we may need to take a step back and consider a more comprehensive fix. It seems we’re not correctly identifying subject selectors in general when they don’t include element, class, or attribute selectors.
See [this playground example](https://play.vuejs.org/#eNqNksFOwzAQRH/F8glElaiCUwiVAFUCDoCAoy8h2TYujteynb... | 2025-06-05T10:26:21 | 2025-06-05T10:26:21 | {
"+1": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,454,654,834 | 12,321 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | ------------------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB | 38.3 kB | 34.5 kB |
| vue.... | 2024-11-04T12:59:41 | 2025-06-05T01:42:14 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,942,454,769 | 12,648 | edison1105 | /ecosystem-ci run | 2025-06-05T01:48:24 | 2025-06-05T01:48:24 | {
"+1": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,942,476,383 | 12,831 | vue-bot |
📝 Ran ecosystem CI: [Open](https://github.com//vuejs/ecosystem-ci/actions/runs/15456436301)
| suite | result | [latest scheduled](https://github.com/vuejs/ecosystem-ci/actions/runs/15433987587) |
|-------|--------|----------------|
| nuxt | :white_check_mark: [success](https://github.com/vuejs/ecosystem-ci/actions/r... | 2025-06-05T01:51:58 | 2025-06-05T01:51:58 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 2,568,642,024 | 12,642 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB (**+139 B**) | 38.4 kB (**+29 B**) | 34.6 kB (**+34 B**) |
... | 2025-01-03T03:11:47 | 2025-06-07T00:40:36 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,953,360,074 | 13,429 | edison1105 | this is also related to #10551 | 2025-06-08T01:09:00 | 2025-06-08T01:09:00 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,953,466,856 | 13,445 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->
## Walkthrough
The `removeStaticBinding` function in the SSR compiler transform was updated to use explicit string checks instead of a regular expression for identifying and removing static bindings from a template liter... | 2025-06-08T03:06:55 | 2025-06-08T03:09:29 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,936,795,135 | 12,913 | sadeghbarati | I am here to ask whether this is a good practice or not?
Cause I saw somewhere that was mentioned the modelValue modifiers should be re-defined in the child component even if the modifier already exists in Vue internal like trim/number/lazy | 2025-06-03T19:11:36 | 2025-06-03T19:13:50 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,938,820,388 | 13,396 | edison1105 | /ecosystem-ci run | 2025-06-04T06:51:38 | 2025-06-04T06:51:38 | {
"+1": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,888,166,746 | 13,345 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->
## Walkthrough
The changes update the logic determining whether a root node has a single element child by introducing a new function that ignores comment nodes. This ensures static prop hoisting works correctly even when... | 2025-05-17T07:13:31 | 2025-06-04T08:22:55 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,571,963,221 | 12,648 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ------ | ------- | ------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB | 38.3 kB | 34.5 kB |
| vue.global.prod.js | 159 kB | 58.5 kB | 52.1 kB |
### Usages
| Name | Size | G... | 2025-01-06T01:50:16 | 2025-06-05T01:46:13 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,942,491,312 | 12,648 | vue-bot |
📝 Ran ecosystem CI: [Open](https://github.com//vuejs/ecosystem-ci/actions/runs/15456542135)
| suite | result | [latest scheduled](https://github.com/vuejs/ecosystem-ci/actions/runs/15433987587) |
|-------|--------|----------------|
| radix-vue | :white_check_mark: [success](https://github.com/vuejs/ecosystem-ci/acti... | 2025-06-05T01:56:33 | 2025-06-05T01:56:33 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 2,629,482,753 | 12,804 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | ------------------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB (**+17 B**) | 38.3 kB (**+5 B**) | 34.6 kB (**+25 B**) |
| vue.... | 2025-02-02T17:30:52 | 2025-06-05T02:08:56 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,663,923,293 | 12,900 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/63eddc5d-09c1-4f81-94a4-8f04f2e83311)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@12900
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-02-17T19:19:04 | 2025-06-05T02:13:43 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,943,493,711 | 13,433 | skirtles-code | @jsy-0526 Please push your latest changes to the PR so we can see them. | 2025-06-05T09:46:38 | 2025-06-05T09:46:38 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 2,948,437,631 | 13,442 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/0f5811c6-9723-486e-9677-01aad0df096b)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13442
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-06-06T08:06:50 | 2025-06-06T09:51:17 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,998,686,375 | 13,520 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: skip review by coderabbit.ai -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> ## Review skipped
>
> Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.
>
>
>
> Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit... | 2025-06-24T03:38:40 | 2025-06-24T07:51:44 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,009,154,853 | 8,351 | SergkeiM | Any plans to fix this? | 2025-06-26T17:05:29 | 2025-06-26T17:05:29 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,015,460,325 | 13,518 | JulianCataldo | Cool, thank you very much! Seems easier that way, versus messing with the 8th generic dedicated to "real" Vue emits.
Basically `onFooBar` in Props generic get transformed to `@foo-bar`. So I need to pretransform real DOM event names like `foo-bar` to `onFooBar` first 😅 Then Vue does `@foo-bar` back. I guess there is a... | 2025-06-28T15:16:41 | 2025-06-28T15:16:41 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,017,427,825 | 13,541 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ------ | ------- | ------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB | 38.3 kB | 34.5 kB |
| vue.global.prod.js | 159 kB | 58.5 kB | 52 kB |
### Usages
| Name | Size | G... | 2025-06-30T01:16:29 | 2025-06-30T01:16:29 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,022,247,972 | 13,484 | xu1132 | What can I do about it | 2025-07-01T07:20:18 | 2025-07-01T07:37:17 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,029,789,224 | 66 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/00358ee1-ec52-4ee7-a09a-09444dcfc2b9)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@66
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@v... | 2025-07-03T00:18:05 | 2025-07-03T00:18:05 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,993,884,008 | 13,511 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->
## Walkthrough
The changes introduce a new SSR hydration test for async components and refactor the internal hydration logic in the async component wrapper. The test simulates updating an async component's props before i... | 2025-06-22T02:16:53 | 2025-07-03T08:27:14 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,031,404,369 | 13,511 | niksy | > @niksy fixed via [1b05c28](https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/1b05c2834223ea25cd41359de7c6fce22d53f2a6)
Works now, thanks! | 2025-07-03T08:42:02 | 2025-07-03T08:42:02 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,922,487,803 | 13,422 | netlify[bot] | ### <span aria-hidden="true">✅</span> Deploy Preview for *vapor-repl* ready!
| Name | Link |
|:-:|------------------------|
|<span aria-hidden="true">🔨</span> Latest commit | 6c5ebf4df5471d4782435e4b686488d591842388 |
|<span aria-hidden="true">🔍</span> Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/projects/vapor-rep... | 2025-05-30T14:03:13 | 2025-06-24T09:13:41 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,013,198,483 | 13,044 | zhiyuanzmj | Not sure, Maybe vue-jsx-vapor should have its own generator. | 2025-06-27T14:04:24 | 2025-06-27T14:04:24 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,022,097,415 | 13,546 | edison1105 | This is considered adding a new API and needs to go through the RFC process to gather feedback from community first. | 2025-07-01T06:44:40 | 2025-07-01T06:44:40 | {
"+1": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,034,166,675 | 13,561 | netlify[bot] | ### <span aria-hidden="true">✅</span> Deploy Preview for *vapor-repl* ready!
| Name | Link |
|:-:|------------------------|
|<span aria-hidden="true">🔨</span> Latest commit | 139546231f156764f69609b920e5995b6df66802 |
|<span aria-hidden="true">🔍</span> Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/projects/vapor-rep... | 2025-07-04T01:45:18 | 2025-07-04T01:46:37 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,034,278,010 | 13,562 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ----------------- | ------------------ | ------------------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB (**-8 B**) | 38.4 kB (**-1 B**) | 34.5 kB (**-70 B**) |
| vue.glo... | 2025-07-04T03:03:45 | 2025-07-04T03:03:45 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,013,215,632 | 13,535 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB (**+252 B**) | 38.3 kB (**+26 B**) | 34.6 kB (**+47 B**) |
... | 2025-06-27T14:10:21 | 2025-06-27T14:10:21 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,016,144,908 | 13,539 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/ec78358c-4f83-44b7-a818-ba86a6371671)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13539
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-06-28T23:23:21 | 2025-06-28T23:39:05 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,016,273,229 | 13,540 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/7c35c4d9-1964-47ec-8151-6de9002049ba)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13540
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-06-29T03:50:47 | 2025-06-29T03:50:47 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,017,423,033 | 13,541 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: skip review by coderabbit.ai -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> ## Review skipped
>
> Bot user detected.
>
> To trigger a single review, invoke the `@coderabbitai review` command.
>
> You can disable this status message... | 2025-06-30T01:15:28 | 2025-06-30T01:15:28 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,030,772,371 | 13,557 | Ali-ovo | > I have verified your case in Test.vue
>
> ```
> watch(() => unref(count),(nv) => {
> console.log(nv)
> })
> ```
>
> The code above is listening normally
>
> However, is there a problem with using hook in this way? I haven't used props as parameters before. Does this break the concept of unidirectional data flow?... | 2025-07-03T05:12:24 | 2025-07-03T05:12:24 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,031,318,858 | 12,461 | vue-bot |
📝 Ran ecosystem CI: [Open](https://github.com//vuejs/ecosystem-ci/actions/runs/16044777127)
| suite | result | [latest scheduled](https://github.com/vuejs/ecosystem-ci/actions/runs/16016522485) |
|-------|--------|----------------|
| pinia | :white_check_mark: [success](https://github.com/vuejs/ecosystem-ci/actions/... | 2025-07-03T08:13:47 | 2025-07-03T08:13:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 3,031,353,191 | 13,511 | edison1105 | @niksy fixed via https://github.com/vuejs/core/pull/13511/commits/1b05c2834223ea25cd41359de7c6fce22d53f2a6 | 2025-07-03T08:25:45 | 2025-07-03T08:25:45 | {
"rocket": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,032,932,014 | 13,070 | zhiyuanzmj | Done. | 2025-07-03T16:51:06 | 2025-07-03T16:51:06 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,999,050,271 | 13,518 | jh-leong | as a workaround: [Playground](https://play.vuejs.org/#eNp9VF1v2jAU/StXVrW0Ei0PfcvS7INSaUPaqpY3jNQAF+bi2JHt0LKI/75rmwTYuj4Q4utzv865Nw37UlVXmxpZyjI7N6JyYNHVFchCrW44c5aznCtRVto4aMBtK4RbXAqFA01Ghcr1onVYCmfH+t7oysIOlkaXkFDo5CNXXAXIoLZOl0OJJblZuIGGK4Ck3F4uRCH1KkmjBQA3HtEdCRQRl7pCRbB9JI/KGvDGFGZaSywU7HLK6H124d8//W9fQyjzjorLxo... | 2025-06-24T06:52:32 | 2025-06-24T06:52:32 | {
"heart": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,001,714,292 | 13,524 | JustSxm | ```
function onInput(event: Event) {
let modifiedValue = 'a'
model.value = modifiedValue
event.target.value = modifiedValue
}
```
Solves my issue | 2025-06-24T20:04:42 | 2025-06-24T20:12:31 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,016,853,334 | 13,182 | KazariEX | While both are probably trivial, I think it's more for memory considerations than speed here. | 2025-06-29T16:48:42 | 2025-06-29T16:48:42 | {
"+1": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,026,558,949 | 13,555 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->
## Walkthrough
The code updates the naming of a function and its import alias related to URL parsing in a utility file. The alias for the imported `parse` function from the 'url' module is changed, and the internal helpe... | 2025-07-02T05:59:46 | 2025-07-02T06:05:02 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,032,394,343 | 12,442 | edison1105 | Closing as #12439 has been fixed by #12442 | 2025-07-03T14:00:50 | 2025-07-03T14:00:50 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,034,284,130 | 13,563 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: skip review by coderabbit.ai -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> ## Review skipped
>
> Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.
>
>
>
> Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit... | 2025-07-04T03:07:01 | 2025-07-04T03:07:01 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,013,214,197 | 13,535 | edison1105 | Thanks for the PR.
Could you please provide a benchmark for these changes?
NOTE:
This PR increases the bundle size | 2025-06-27T14:09:59 | 2025-06-27T14:46:35 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,016,273,167 | 13,540 | github-actions[bot] | ## Size Report
### Bundles
| File | Size | Gzip | Brotli |
| -------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | ------------------- |
| runtime-dom.global.prod.js | 101 kB (**-21 B**) | 38.3 kB (**-7 B**) | 34.5 kB (**+13 B**) |
| vue.... | 2025-06-29T03:50:36 | 2025-06-29T03:50:36 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,018,538,720 | 13,543 | edison1105 | > Once in a resolved state, <Suspense> will only revert to a pending state if the root node of the #default slot is replaced. New async dependencies nested deeper in the tree will not cause the <Suspense> to revert to a pending state.
this is the documented behavior. | 2025-06-30T09:59:22 | 2025-06-30T09:59:22 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,021,255,005 | 13,539 | vue-bot |
📝 Ran ecosystem CI: [Open](https://github.com//vuejs/ecosystem-ci/actions/runs/15986501886)
| suite | result | [latest scheduled](https://github.com/vuejs/ecosystem-ci/actions/runs/15964297724) |
|-------|--------|----------------|
| language-tools | :white_check_mark: [success](https://github.com/vuejs/ecosystem-ci... | 2025-07-01T00:22:11 | 2025-07-01T00:22:11 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 3,017,428,096 | 13,541 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/0eeb93dc-2633-4f30-a18e-f6b474891b5c)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13541
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-06-30T01:16:32 | 2025-07-01T20:15:38 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,030,831,493 | 13,557 | rzzf | > In addition, this is the recommended approach when we need to pass a destructured prop into an external function while retaining reactivity:
> ```ts
> useComposable(() => foo)
> ```
I think this is a problem with the usage method, and there is similar explanation in the official [documentation](https://vuejs.org/gui... | 2025-07-03T05:32:38 | 2025-07-03T05:32:38 | {
"+1": 2
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 2,495,369,612 | 12,461 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/041721bb-b239-4381-8521-ac4f838cf1ac)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@12461
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2024-11-23T06:43:16 | 2025-07-03T07:52:54 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,032,735,236 | 13,070 | zhiyuanzmj | And the dynamic modelName also has problems.
| 2025-07-03T15:37:09 | 2025-07-03T15:37:09 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,034,166,682 | 13,561 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: skip review by coderabbit.ai -->
> [!IMPORTANT]
> ## Review skipped
>
> Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.
>
>
>
> Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit... | 2025-07-04T01:45:19 | 2025-07-04T01:45:19 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,034,276,275 | 13,562 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->
## Walkthrough
The update modifies the internal logic of the `finishLeave` function within the `resolveTransitionProps` implementation in the transition component. Specifically, it removes the step that previously delete... | 2025-07-04T03:02:59 | 2025-07-04T03:03:33 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,999,302,303 | 13,521 | KazariEX | Duplicate of vuejs/language-tools#4972. | 2025-06-24T08:19:13 | 2025-06-24T08:19:13 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,022,073,963 | 13,546 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->
## Walkthrough
A new utility function, `unwrapFragment`, is introduced to flatten arrays of virtual nodes by recursively unwrapping all fragment nodes. Accompanying this, a type guard `isFragmentVNode` is added. The new ... | 2025-07-01T06:38:19 | 2025-07-01T06:41:07 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,022,282,685 | 13,453 | xu1132 | what can i do about it? | 2025-07-01T07:29:01 | 2025-07-01T07:37:05 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,030,974,402 | 13,557 | Thunder7991 | > > In addition, this is the recommended approach when we need to pass a destructured prop into an external function while retaining reactivity:
> > useComposable(() => foo)
>
> I think this is a problem with the usage method, and there is similar explanation in the official [documentation](https://vuejs.org/guide/com... | 2025-07-03T06:09:14 | 2025-07-03T06:09:14 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,032,659,324 | 13,070 | yyx990803 | > So what if I define a model called model$?
Should be avoidable if using `modelModifiers$` instead? | 2025-07-03T15:18:12 | 2025-07-03T15:18:12 | {
"+1": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,015,299,344 | 13,537 | edison1105 | Thanks for this PR. but we already made these changes in the vapor branch (will be merge into main soon)
see https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/cd93dad4d97971d30e89924387c2378e8bc43c70 | 2025-06-28T13:57:33 | 2025-06-28T13:57:33 | {
"hooray": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,994,745,412 | 13,515 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/626ddcf5-beae-405d-bd42-2a1cec95c2df)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13515
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-06-23T02:51:59 | 2025-06-30T01:16:29 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,908,699,956 | 13,383 | netlify[bot] | ### <span aria-hidden="true">✅</span> Deploy Preview for *vapor-repl* ready!
| Name | Link |
|:-:|------------------------|
|<span aria-hidden="true">🔨</span> Latest commit | 63ec52aaa9d38a87efef42f362bb43eeeaea3081 |
|<span aria-hidden="true">🔍</span> Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/projects/vapor-rep... | 2025-05-26T06:29:59 | 2025-06-30T09:57:18 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,024,926,830 | 13,549 | xvaara | @edison1105 Didn't notice that because conditional wasn't the bug I was refering to. I've removed the conditional from the reproduction. | 2025-07-01T17:27:32 | 2025-07-01T17:27:32 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,030,499,255 | 13,558 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/2c132927-ecb8-469c-a094-5f8b3479ef14)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13558
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-07-03T03:24:01 | 2025-07-03T05:41:07 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,996,547,956 | 13,519 | netlify[bot] | ### <span aria-hidden="true">✅</span> Deploy Preview for *vapor-repl* ready!
| Name | Link |
|:-:|------------------------|
|<span aria-hidden="true">🔨</span> Latest commit | ead1600aa48721e863b603666c530f4cba260505 |
|<span aria-hidden="true">🔍</span> Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/projects/vapor-rep... | 2025-06-23T13:40:27 | 2025-06-23T13:41:32 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,994,745,656 | 13,516 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/6930e0b4-5889-42f4-8ab6-afc355d26cdd)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13516
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-06-23T02:52:10 | 2025-06-30T01:16:40 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,024,573,854 | 9,448 | skirtles-code | I think the underlying problem was fixed in #12321 (released 3.5.17).
The test in this PR covers a slightly different case to #12321, as it accounts for the role of `transformText` in creating a `TEXT_CALL` node. I've added a similar test as part of #13550. | 2025-07-01T15:43:08 | 2025-07-01T15:43:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 3,026,661,510 | 13,555 | mjlxiaoma | sorry，is parseUriParts | 2025-07-02T06:48:31 | 2025-07-02T06:48:31 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,030,610,099 | 13,557 | Thunder7991 | I have verified your case in Test.vue
```
watch(() => unref(count),(nv) => {
console.log(nv)
})
```
The code above is listening normally
However, is there a problem with using hook in this way? I haven't used props as parameters before. Does this break the concept of unidirectional data flow?
I think this way of us... | 2025-07-03T04:20:49 | 2025-07-03T04:20:49 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,031,287,239 | 13,511 | niksy | @edison1105 This seems to work in development build with warning, but still fails in production build.
Development build
Production build
![Screenshot 2025-07-03 at 10 02 41](https://github.... | 2025-07-03T08:03:37 | 2025-07-03T08:03:51 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,002,696,820 | 13,525 | netlify[bot] | ### <span aria-hidden="true">✅</span> Deploy Preview for *vapor-repl* ready!
| Name | Link |
|:-:|------------------------|
|<span aria-hidden="true">🔨</span> Latest commit | 5a487cfd66bec7d39623ed3677fa13168a41d6fa |
|<span aria-hidden="true">🔍</span> Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/projects/vapor-rep... | 2025-06-25T03:07:37 | 2025-06-25T03:08:46 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 2,998,687,945 | 13,520 | pkg-pr-new[bot] |
[Open in StackBlitz](https://pkg.pr.new/template/b42db89f-e678-4f2c-9431-28f09a6315cb)
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-core</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@vue/compiler-core@13520
```
</p></details>
<details><summary><b>@vue/compiler-dom</b></summary><p>
```
npm i https://pkg.pr.new... | 2025-06-24T03:39:41 | 2025-06-26T07:40:22 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,012,894,827 | 13,533 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->
## Walkthrough
The internal management of child effect scopes within the `EffectScope` class has been refactored from using an array to a doubly linked list. This involved updating properties and logic for adding, iterat... | 2025-06-27T12:30:05 | 2025-06-27T12:34:10 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,013,050,770 | 13,535 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->
## Walkthrough
The internal implementation of the `EffectScope` class has been refactored to manage its child scopes using a custom doubly linked list instead of an array. Methods for pausing, resuming, and stopping scop... | 2025-06-27T13:16:20 | 2025-06-27T14:14:17 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,016,259,550 | 13,182 | alex-snezhko | I would also agree, my sense is that the performance impact of constructing the context object would not be very substantial (if performance is the reason this optimization exists).
In fact, I would not be surprised if always constructing/hydrating the context object would actually be _more_ efficient due to less bran... | 2025-06-29T03:17:42 | 2025-06-29T03:17:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 3,026,675,623 | 13,555 | edison1105 | Thanks for the PR, but there are no typos in the method name. I don't think this is worth it. | 2025-07-02T06:54:33 | 2025-07-02T06:54:33 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,032,635,498 | 13,070 | KazariEX | So what if I define a model called `model$`? | 2025-07-03T15:13:01 | 2025-07-03T15:13:01 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 3,034,179,642 | 13,561 | edison1105 | fixed in https://github.com/vuejs/core/pull/13408 | 2025-07-04T01:57:52 | 2025-07-04T01:57:52 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 2,999,939,990 | 5,927 | skirtles-code | I don't think there's a bug here. The exact execution order of `mounted`/`onMounted` isn't documented and I don't see a compelling reason why a global mixin should be given priority. While I can understand the reasoning that the global mixin is registered first, it could equally be argued that `mounted` consistently ru... | 2025-06-24T11:21:57 | 2025-06-24T11:21:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 3,000,400,155 | 12,088 | aelgn | I was sad to see that the PR #12704 was not included in v3.5.17 released last week.
Until PR is merged / this issue otherwise fixed we are using a custom vite logger to filter out the offending message deluge to gain use of log output, if anyone is interested:
`vite.config.ts`
```
import { createLogger, defineConfig ... | 2025-06-24T13:01:06 | 2025-06-24T13:01:06 | {
"+1": 3,
"heart": 1
} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 3,016,144,764 | 13,539 | coderabbitai[bot] | <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: summarize by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- walkthrough_start -->
## Walkthrough
This change refactors and extends the SSR handling of `<select>` elements with dynamic and static value bindings. It centralizes logic for processing `<select>` children into a shared utility, updates SSR ... | 2025-06-28T23:22:45 | 2025-06-28T23:40:24 | {} | NONE |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.