prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Array Length Not Validated
### Description
The `Vault.install` function did not validate that the length of `_selectors` and `_plugins` arrays is the same. If the array length is different, it might cause unexpected behavior.
### Recommendation
It is recommended to implement validation to ensure that the le... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: `transferOwnership` should be two step process
### Description
All contracts are inherited from OpenZeppelin's Ownable and OwnableUpgradable contract which enables the onlyOwner role to transfer ownership to another address. It's possible that the onlyOwner role mistakenly transfers ownership to the wrong add... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: Pack structs by putting data types in ascending size (We can save up to ~6k gas)
### Description
As the solidity EVM works with 32 bytes, variables less than 32 bytes should be packed inside a struct so that they can be stored in the same slot, this saves gas when writing to storage ~20000 gas.
https://github... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | false | false | ## Low: `notAtSameBlock` Modifier May Be Bypassed
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> The purpose of the notAtSameBlock modifier is to prevent the risk of flash loans and sandwich attacks in strategy contracts involving DEX-related transa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Refunds processed for incorrect direction
### Description
In the case of an incoming transaction, funds are pulled from the counterparty.
```solidity
if (_incoming) {
// ...
IERC20(_tokenContract).transferFrom(_counterparty, address(this), _amount);
}
```
Hence, when the timelock expires and the count... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Batches committed during an on going challenge can avoid being challenged
### Description
Batches committed during an ongoing challenge can avoid being challenged and pre-maturely finalize if the defender wins
### Impact
Critical - Can brick the entire Morph L2 protocol
### Recommendation
You can make the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | true | false | ## Gas: Using unchecked blocks to save gas
### Description
Solidity version 0.8+ comes with implicit overflow and underflow checks on unsigned integers. When an overflow or an underflow isn’t possible (as an example, when a comparison is made before the arithmetic operation), some gas can be saved by using an unchecke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Seized tokens will be stuck on the receiver of the seized funds because it is not an investor and never receives investorsBalance
### Description
**Description:** When seizing DSTokens, the receiver of the confiscated assets must be an issuer wallet. A wallet that is an issuer wallet must not be an investor wa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Vulnerable NPM Packages
### Description
## NPM Audit Report
The NPM audit identified a total of **108 vulnerabilities**. These vulnerabilities may pose a significant risk to the security of Metamask Snap.
## Severity Breakdown
- **108 moderate severity vulnerabilities**
## Recommended Actions
To address is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Don't update state | true | true |
User will have their funds lost if they tries to pay the protocol with `_dontMint = False`. A payment made with this parameter set should increase the `creditsOf[]` balance of user.
In `_processPayment()`, `creditsOf[_data.beneficiary]` is updated at the end if there are leftover funds. However, If `metadata` is prov... | Code4rena | 4 | Juicebox |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Improper Implementation Of Mint Cap Check
### Description
## Mint Cap Parameter and Remediation
The `mint_cap` parameter set by the protocol limits the number of mintable MOD tokens. The limit is checked by confirming that the newly minted amount alongside the previous total debt does not exceed the `mint_cap... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Missing Check for `tokenId ` Existence Before Returning the `tokenURI`
### Description
The `tokenURI` in `BorrowerNFT.sol` overrides ERC721Z's implementation. The implementation does not check that `tokenId` exists and hence will return data for non-existent `tokenId`. This goes contrary to [EIP721](https://ei... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Implement PartyThreshold Validation in NewKeyring Function
### Description
The `NewKeyring` function in the `keeper` package is not validating that the `PartyThreshold` is greater than zero. This could lead to the creation of keyrings with invalid thresholds, potentially causing issues in multi-party operation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | oracle | true | false | ## Gas: Modifier execution order can help save an entire SLOAD(Save 2100 Gas)
### Description
https://github.com/open-dollar/od-contracts/blob/f4f0246bb26277249c1d5afe6201d4d9096e52e6/src/contracts/proxies/Vault721.sol#L104-L114
**Note: This would only make sense if `governor` remains a state variable, bot has sugges... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Underflow in negative interest rate calculation leads to denial of service
### Description
The `calculatePrice` function attempts to apply a negative per‐second interest rate by subtracting the accumulated rate adjustment from `PRICE_PRECISION`. However, when
evaluates to a negative value, a uint256 underflo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Not using the named return variables anywhere in the function is confusing
### Description
Consider changing the variable to be an unnamed one.
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-gogopool/blob/aec9928d8bdce8a5a4efe45f54c39d4fc7313731/contracts/contract/MinipoolManager... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: A single point of failure
### Description
### Impact
The `owner` role has a single point of failure and `onlyOwner` can use critical a few functions.
`owner` role in the project:
Owner is not behind a multisig and changes are not behind a timelock.
Even if protocol admins/developers are not malicious there... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Improving display of information
### Description
In _constructURI(), the printed JSON string is composed of some properties.
It is recommended to change the {id} placeholder to a more informative value, such as
`LibString.toHexString(_hatId, 32)` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Identical for loop check
### Description
The if block in the constructor of PoolTokens.sol entails identical if block checks that may be moved outside the loop to save gas.
https://github.com/reserve-protocol/protocol/blob/9ee60f142f9f5c1fe8bc50eef915cf33124a534f/contracts/plugins/assets/curve/PoolTokens.sol#... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [1] `for`-loops should be broken out of earlier
### Description
If it's known that the function will revert after the `for`-loop completes, `break` should be used to end the loop early | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: RewardThrottle: If an epoch does not have any profit, then there may not be rewards for that epoch at the start of the next epoch.
### Description
In RewardThrottle, both checkRewardUnderflow and fillInEpochGaps call `\_fillInEpochGaps` to fill the state of the previous epoch without profit, the difference be... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: [04] Bonding Curve Creation Lacks URI Validation in Metadata Leading to Potential Malformed Token Information
### Description
The Pump Science protocol allows creators to create bonding curves with associated token metadata. The metadata creation is handled in the `initialize_meta()` function of the `CreateBon... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: EToken Transferability May Lead to Undercollateralized Trove
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `87680502edc325f16b93658111635ba482b9a5eb`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Disabled transferability of EToken.
**File(s) affected:**`EToken.sol`, `Collat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Minimal number of responses for oracle aggregation.
### Description
**Description**
Aggregator Oracle.sol: canUpdate(), performUpdate().
Both functions for the update check and update performance use the same minimal number of valid oracles updates: validResponses $>=1$, requesting minimum 1 correct response... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Market Flag Check
### Description
## WithdrawNFT and WithdrawNFTSolvent Instructions
The `WithdrawNFT` and `WithdrawNFTSolvent` instructions check that the market currently allows borrows. However, it is performing an NFT withdrawal, not a borrow.
### Code Reference
In the source file `src/instruct... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | reentrancy | true | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-hats-judging/issues/41
## Found by
obront, roguereddwarf
## Summary
The `checkAfterExecution()` function has checks to ensure that new modules cannot be added by signers. This is a crucial check, because adding a new module could give them unlimited power to make a... | Sherlock | 5 | Hats |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: NEGATIVE AMOUNTS IN INPUT FIELDS
### Description
It was found that `https://hsuite-finance.firebaseapp.com` allowed for negative values to be entered in the `amount` input fields. When the transaction was performed, it did, however, use the positive representation of the value.
![Join pool allows negative val... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Testnet Code Remnant in Production Smart Contract.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**description**
bpnmMain.sol: getBtcPrice().
The function contains hardcoded values intended for testnet use, which is noticeable in pre-
production smart contract code. While convenient... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: [02] Miscalculation and potential loss of funds in `safeTransferFrom` function
### Description
The `safeTransferFrom` function is intended to handle the transfer of ERC-20 tokens while accounting for potential transfer fees by comparing the balances before and after the transfer. However, this function fails t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: 6. INCORRECT LIMIT CHECK IN ZKASM ECRECOVER IMPLEMENTATION
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Path:** [StakeableVestingFactory.sol:deployStakeableVesting#L39-L71](https://github.com/0xPolygonHermez/zkevm-rom/blob/develop/main/ecrecover/ecrecover.zkasm#L61C8-L67)
**Description:**
In the zkASM impleme... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Return Values Not Verified
### Description
**Update**
From the team:
**File(s) affected:**`packages/amm/contracts/HifiPool.sol`, `packages/proxy-target/contracts/HifiProxyTarget.sol`
**Description:** Several contracts within the protocol make external calls to functions with return values which indicate the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing Burn Functionality in RAACNFT
### Description
## 01. Relevant GitHub Links
 
* [RAACNFT.sol#L75](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2025-02-raac/blob/89ccb062e2b175374d40d824263a4c0b601bcb7f/contracts/core/tokens/RAACNFT.sol#L75)
## 02. Summary
The website mentions that users can burn NFTs to redeem as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing check for `house_fee_basis_points` during auction initialization.
### Description
**Description**
During the initialization of the auction, as it was said in the postaudit for low-2, there is no check for the passed 'house_fee_basis_points' variable.
programs/auction_house/src/methods/initialize.rs
Li... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Centralization risks
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In ComptrollerNFTPart1 contract, The functions `_setNFTCollateralFactor()`, `_setNFTCollateralSeizeLiquidationFactor()`, `_setNFTCollateralLiquidationBonusPBX()`, `_setNFTLiquidationExchangePToken()`, `_setNFTX... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Hardcoded slippage tolerance risks poor trading or DOS
### Description
In the `PositionInteractionFacet.sol` contract, the slippage tolerance is hardcoded to 2% in the `_applySlippage` function:
```solidity
function _applySlippage(uint256 amountIn) internal pure returns (uint256) {
// 2% slippage from qu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `tokenIconURL` is not used in `proposeTokenUnwhitelisting()`
### Description
[`tokenIconURL`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-01-salty/blob/53516c2cdfdfacb662cdea6417c52f23c94d5b5b/src/dao/Proposals.sol#L180) is only used when whitelisting tokens but not when [unwhitelisting](https://github.com/code-423n4/2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: [06] Lack of zero address checks for `Trading.sol` constructor for the variables `_position`, `_gov` and `_pairsContract`
### Description
If these variable get configured with address zero, failure to immediately reset the value can result in unexpected behavior for the project.
https://github.com/code-423n4/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: moveQuoteToken updates pool state using intermediary LUP, biasing pool's interest rate calculations
### Description
In LenderActions's moveQuoteToken() LUP is being evaluated after liquidity removal, but before liquidity addition. This intermediary LUP doesn't correspond to the final state of the pool, but is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Functions not used internally could be marked external | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Individual pools cannot have zero-fee hooks if DEFAULT_POOL hook fee is set to non-zero
### Description
Severity: Low Risk
Context: VerifiedPoolsBasicHook.sol#L357-L360
Description: In the case where hookFees[DEFAULT_POOL] is set greater than zero, it is impossible for specific
pools to allow for a hookFee = 0... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: Reentrancy attack in emergencyWithdraw function
### Description
**Description**
During the manual audit, we found that the emergencyWithdraw function in the contract
LPStaking.sol is prone to reentrancy attack as the contract makes tokens transfer before
updating the user's balance to zero(0). Also, this fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: Abusing setCertTime Transactions to drain node ...
### Description
Report type: Blockchain/DLT
Target: https://github.com/shardeum/shardeum/tree/dev
Impacts:
* Direct loss of funds
## Description
## Description
In shardeum there's a mechnism that can extends the expiration date of a stake certificate b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unaudited version of OpenZeppelin used
### Description
The repository in which the audited contracts are held is using [*openzeppelin-solidity*](https://github.com/centrehq/centre-tokens/blob/4b9ebf3941a48e41e7363fee729035610a71ca66/package.json#L39) [`v1.11.0`](https://github.com/centrehq/centre-tokens/blob/4... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Short, long, collateral, and vault data structures may be sparse “arrays” Difficulty: Undetermined
### Description
The `MarginVault` contains arrays that store short and long oTokens and collateral.
```solidity
struct Vault {
address[] shortOtokens;
address[] longOtokens;
address[] collateralAssets;
uin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: unit test coverage
### Description
The unit test coverage for the entire project is around 75%, with some of the contracts having particularly low coverage.
Considering the importance of unit tests to validate code and prevent regressions when refactoring and developing new features, we encourage significant... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Potentially missing nonce check Acknowledged
### Description
When executing withdrawals in the collateral manager the per-address withdrawal nonce is simply updated without checking that the new nonce is one greater than the previous one (see Examples). It seems like without such a check it might be easy t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Use assembly to check for `address(0)`
### Description
Use assembly to check for `address(0)`
### Impact
Gas savings | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: User cannot claim rewards or `close_position`, due to vulnerable division by zero handling
### Description
A user cannot claim rewards or `close_position`, due to vulnerable division by zero handling in the `claim -> calculate_rewards` flow.
In `calculate_rewards`, a user’s reward per farm per epoch is based... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | reentrancy | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-08-sentiment-judging/tree/main/267-H
## Found by
WATCHPUG
## Summary
Curve controller's `canRemoveLiquidity()` should return all the underlying tokens as `tokensIn` rather than only the tokens with `minAmount > 0`.
## Vulnerability Detail
https://github.com/sentiment... | Sherlock | 4 | Sentiment |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use SMTChecker
### Description
The highest tier of smart contract behavior assurance is formal mathematical verification. All assertions that are made are guaranteed to be true across all inputs → The quality of your asserts is the quality of your verification
https://twitter.com/0xOwenThurm/status/1614359896... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Wrong Function visibility.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Unresolved
**Description**
In contract DistributionManager:
getRecipients: this function was not called internally in the contracts, but it was declared as public
**Recommendation**:
declare it as an external
_validateReci... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: M10] BeamBalanceStore’s initialize function lacks the onlyConstruction modifier
### Description
###### Medium
The [`initialize`](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/c0d8477866a8667a37f45c85378c5938c84569cd/contracts/currency/BeamBalanceStore.sol#L217) [function](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/cur... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Absence Of Check On Initial Tokens Minted
### Description
## VariableSupplyERC20Token Constructor Review
In the constructor of `VariableSupplyERC20Token`, the `maxSupply_` and `initialSupply_` values are passed in as arguments. The constructor lacks any check on the value of `initialSupply_` to assert that i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: MigratorZap 's v2InventoryToXNFT() allows for NFT stealing as a result of operational mis- take
### Description
The function `v2InventoryToXNFT()` allows a user to specify both the v2 Vault address and its id. If `vTokenV2` and `nftxVaultFactory.vault(vaultId)` mismatch, the result of `v2Inventory.withdraw(... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use assembly to check for `address(0)`
### Description
*Saves 6 gas per instance*
*Instances (2)*:
[Link to code](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tessera/blob/f37a11407da2af844bbfe868e1422e3665a5f8e4/src/seaport/modules/OptimisticListingSeaport.sol) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: POTENTIAL COMPLETE PROFIT CAPTURE VIA ADMIN FEES
### Description
The `CreateHumaConfig` instruction allows for the creation of the Huma configuration account by providing a set of parameters, one of which is **protocol\_fee\_bps**, later used to calculate the protocol fees. This values can be modified at any t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing Events in init Functions ✓ Fixed
### Description
The code is missing events that should be emitted when certain state variables are updated, even though the events have already been declared. Specifically:
* The `_TOKEN_RECEIVER_` variable is updated without emitting a `ChangeReceiver` event. Emittin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: `AirdropBroker`: When `block.timestamp == lastEpochUpdate + EPOCH_DURATION`, users can exercise options in the new epoch.
### Description
In AirdropBroker, when a user receives an airdrop, it should only be able to exercise the options in the current epoch.
For example, Alice received the airdrop for epoc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | true | ## High: Drainage of the LEND token reserves through repeated claims of the same rewards
### Description
The `claimLend()` function in CoreRouter allows perpetual granting of LEND tokens because `lendStorage.lendAccrued` is never reset after successful grants, enabling users to claim the same rewards multiple times.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Unify Health Checks
### Description
## Code Review: Unifying Collateral Ratio Checks in Argo
Argo currently uses a number of disjoint checks for each function that interacts with the collateral ratio.
### Existing Checks
In the `argo_engine/sources/engine_v1.move` file, we have the following checks:
It wo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Expiration Checks in Onboarding and Action Confirmation Workflows
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `dab0bb4c252c24d8bd676bb292d1eb68778b728a`.
**File(s) affected:**`daml/splice-dso-governance/daml/Splice/DsoRules.daml`, `daml/splice-dso-governance/daml/Splice/D... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Using a positive conditional flow to save a NOT opcode
### Description
Estimated savings: 3 gas
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-07-basin/blob/main/src/Aquifer.sol#L56
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-07-basin/blob/main/src/Well.sol#L748
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-07-basin/blob/main/src/Well.s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Connectors special withdraw rounding amount direction should not favor user
### Description
When a user withdraws, the rounding direction should always favor the protocol and not the user to make sure that the user cannot take advantage of such rounding error. Yet both Compound V2 special withdraw and ERC46... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Optimize number of external calls
### Description
**Description:** It is noticed that contracts (Unicrow,UnicrowClaim,UnicrowDispute,...)communicate, call each other frequently. Even some view function are called again and again. It is really gas consuming and not recommended.
For example,in `onlyEscrowMember... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Integer Overflow inrevokeStableMaster()
### Description
The `revokeStableMaster()` function is used to revoke a StableMaster contract from the Core contract, and therefore removes the related stablecoin from `stablecoinList`. This function assumes there is always at least one stablecoin in `stablecoinList`, as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Checking non-zero value can avoid an external call to save gas
### Description
_Submitted by 0xRajeev_
Checking if `toSend` > 0 before making the external library call to `LibAsset.transferAsset()` can save 2600 gas by avoiding the external call in such situations. See [L375-L380](https://github.com/code-423n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: More likely to revert operations should be executed first
### Description
Since `py_init`, `px_init`, `py_final` and `px_final` are `int128`, there are `2**128` values they can be assigned to.
This implies, that condition `if (py_init = MAX_PRICE_VALUE || py_final >= MAX_PRICE_VALUE)` will revert for `(2**12... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: If another module adds a module, the safe will be bricked
### Description
If a module is added by another module, it will bypass the `enableNewModule()` function that increments `enabledModuleCount`. This will throw off the module validation in `checkTransaction()` and `checkAfterExecution()` and could cause ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of redundant third-party services
### Description
The system is not configured to have redundant third-party services to use in case a service such as Alchemy or Pimlico is compromised or has downtime. The Gemini Wallet uses Alchemy to read on-chain data and uses Pimlico to submit user operations. If an a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Rewards Not Compounded For Users with Non-Zero lockedUntil
### Description
**Severity** - Informational
**Status** - Acknowledged
**Description**
The pool contract only rewards stakers with yield who staked without a lock period (for these stakers `liquidWeight` is being assigned , for users who have locked... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `getDeployedControllers()` will not return the last index
### Description
[WildcatMarketControllerFactory Line 138](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-wildcat/blob/main/src/WildcatMarketControllerFactory.sol#L138)
### Issue Description
The `getDeployedControllers()` function takes a start and end index of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Inaccurate NatSpec comments in `AppStorage`
### Description
Within the [`AppStorage::SiloSettings`](https://github.com/BeanstalkFarms/Beanstalk/blob/c7a20e56a0a6659c09314a877b440198eff0cd81/protocol/contracts/beanstalk/AppStorage.sol#L373) struct, there is a [comment](https://github.com/BeanstalkFarms/Beanstal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `Indexed` keyword in events causes struct data loss
### Description
When the `indexed` keyword is used for reference type variables such as dynamic arrays or structs, it will return the hash of the mentioned variables. Thus, the event, which is supposed to inform all of the applications subscribed to its emitt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Insufficient public key validation
### Description
The `Sign.sol` contract contains the `_validatePublicKey` function which validates a public key by checking for a minimum key length of 4 bytes. This threshold is substantially below the length required for secure public keys on blockchain technologies like Bi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Potential Underflow Risk and Suboptimal Call Ordering Acknowledged
### Description
The `deposit` and `withdraw` functions calculate a `fee` based on the deposit or withdrawal `amount` and then subtract this `fee` to determine the net amount used for minting or burning. However, if the `amount` is less than th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: performanceFeeShares and managementFeeShares are not correctly calculated
### Description
Although there is a comment mentioning that:
> // Note: the accrued performance fee might be smaller than this because of the management fee.
performanceFeeShares and managementFeeShares are not correctly calculated. On... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Canceled partial redeeming syncs the accounting of a particular cdp without further updating its stake.
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/ebtc-protocol/ebtc/blob/release-0.7/packages/contracts/contracts/CdpManager.sol
Impacts:
- Contract fails to deliver promised returns... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use of Yul optimization pipeline and solc 0.8.13
### Description
The Yul intermediate language pipeline is used to compile the Consideration contract. This pipeline was considered experimental until March 16, 2022, the day Solidity version 0.8.13 was released.
Presumably, the Solidity code compiled through t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | true | false | ## Medium: Unsafe implementation of `fundLoan()` allows attacker to steal collateral from an unfunded loan
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
[`MapleLoanInternals.sol` L257-L273](https://github.com/maple-labs/loan/blob/9684bcef06481e493d060974b1777a4517c4e792/contracts/MapleLoanInternals.sol#L257-L273)
In the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Outdated Solidity version in use
### Description
An outdated Solidity version, `0.5.11`, is currently in use. As Solidity is now under a fast release cycle, consider using the latest compiler version at the time of future deployments and upgrades (presently [`0.8.7`](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.7/)) ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: safeTransfer() not used with transfer functions
### Description
CappedFeeOnTransferToken, CappedGovToken, and SlowRoll do not use `safeTransfer()` functions:
- CappedFeeOnTransferToken calls `_underlying.transferFrom()` on line [96].
- CappedGovToken calls `_underlying.transferFrom()` on line [84].
- SlowR... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Inaccessible elements can be added to _transfers
### Description
Within the [`RSITrendingStrategy` contract](https://github.com/mcdexio/mai-fund-protocol/blob/98af0d1d7e9872ba2b5e734e2a43c161ef635608/contracts/oracle/RSITrendingStrategy.sol), the [`constructor` sets values in the `_transfers` mapping](https://... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | true | false | ## Gas: Don't initialize variables with default value
### Description
**Client:** Fixed in [970b71c](https://github.com/Ranama/StakePet/commit/970b71cfe73760dc694b0c0e1e5a3a77dc704c8c)
**Cyfrin:** Verified. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: AMO model opens up OHM treasury to increased risk
### Description
While H-01 and H-02 describe specific ways that users might manipulate the AMO for their own gain, there is a more general risk associated with connecting the OHM `MINTR` with an external contract in an automated way.
In essence, what the Silo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: A malicious user can potentially escape liquidation by creating a dust amount position and trigger the liquidation by themself
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug, also found by jonah1005_
In the current implementation, a liquidated position can be used for depositing and borrowing again.
However, if t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: `protocolFee` change without `rebase()` leads to incorrect fees
### Description
_Resolved_
`changeProtocolFee()` is used to update the fees applied when `rebase()` is executed.
The issue is that `rebase()` is not called before changing the fees. This causes the new fees to be applied, instead of the old ones... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: [04] After Kakarot's native token is changed, an approval from `account_contract` instances can't be re-triggered
### Description
When an `account_contract` instance is created and initialized, it approves the Kakarot's native token to Kakarot, in order to allow it to settle native transfers happening within t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Can't pause or remove a minter
### Description
The project is supposed to be self-governing. Token owners are able to suggest new minters and collateral. The auction mechanism allows participants to remove collateral from the system if it's deemed unhealthy. But, there's no way to remove a registered minter... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Scope 2 - Invoked Unfreeze Call Does Not Emit an Event
### Description
The emergency upgrade process unfreezes the bridges and hyperchains through the `ProtocolUpgradeHandler` once the upgrade is executed. This is performed by invoking the internal [`_unfreeze` function](https://github.com/ZKsync-Association/z... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary Conditional Calculation
### Description
## Time-Weighted Average Price Calculation in Pyth and Scope
In Pyth and Scope, the time-weighted average price calculation persists even when the `token_info.is_twap_enabled()` condition evaluates to false. This behavior appears to be unnecessary and may re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | false | false | ## Gas: Multiple `address` mappings can be combined into a single `mapping` of an `address` to a `struct`, where appropriate
### Description
Saves a storage slot for the mapping. Depending on the circumstances and sizes of types, can avoid a Gsset (20000 gas) per mapping combined. Reads and subsequent writes can also ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Preview functions fail to verify the outputs
### Description
_Resolved_
The `previewMint()`, `previewRedeem()`, and `previewSwap()` functions enable users to preview their transaction results beforehand, allowing them to verify the outputs before submitting the actual transaction on-chain.
However, these fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Swap fee is hardcoded in `UniswapV3Swapper.swap()`
### Description
In `UniswapV3Swapper.swap()` function: a fixed swap fee of 0.3% (3000) is hardcoded when constructing the `ExactInputSingleParams`, however, Uniswap V3 typically offers several pools for a given token pair, each with different fee rates.
For e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Validation | false | false | _Submitted by Lambda_
`royaltyInfo`, `getRoyalties`, or `getFeeRecipients` may return `address(0)` as the recipient address. While the value 0 is correctly handled for the royalties itself, it is not for the address. In such a case, the ETH amount will be sent to `address(0)`, i.e. it is burned and lost.
### Recommen... | Code4rena | 5 | Foundation |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: `MultiStrategy# removeStrategy()` cannot remove leverage strategies that still have deployed assets
### Description
### Finding description and impact
A leverage strategy with deployed assets can not be removed from `MultiStrategyVault` due to insufficient assets
### Proof of Concept
`MultiStrategyVault`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Initialization | false | true |
The `initialize` method of the `JBTiered721Delegate` contract has as a flag that the `_store` argument is different from `address(0)`, however, it can be initialized by anyone with this value to allow the project to continue with its usual initialization, the attacker could have interfered and modified the correspondi... | Code4rena | 4 | Juicebox |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Incompatible contract used in the WormholeFacet
### Description
During the code review, it has been observed that all other faucets are using the `SwapperV2` contract. However, the `WormholeFacet` is still using the `Swapper` contract. With the recent changes to the `SwapperV2`, leftovers can be sent to a spec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: State variables should be cached in stack variables rather than re-reading them from storage
### Description
The instances below point to the second+ access of a state variable within a function. Caching of a state variable replace each Gwarmaccess (**100 gas**) with a much cheaper stack read. Other less obvio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Yarn commands can fail and still continue execution
### Description
When performing an upgrade or migration, commands are executed through Yarn scripts, defined in the `package.json`. These commands are chained together through the use of `&&`, and the chains are grouped by `;`. Because `;` is used, the exe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Collateral Check Logic in CoreRouter.sol#borrow()
### Description
The borrow() function in CoreRouter.sol implements an incorrect logic for checking a user's collateralization status before allowing a borrow. Instead of directly using the hypothetical account liquidity values calculated by lendStora... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.