prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Appoval Logic in `PDTStakingBatch`
### Description
**Update**
The issue was resolved by the client in commit `26c6478322772ad1be5e14f1fbb89091387f0405`.
The required PDT amount is now approved before executing `PDTStaking.stake()`.
**File(s) affected:**`PDTStakingBatch.sol`
**Description:** The `PDT... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Lack of gap Variable in Base Contract
### Description
The `BaseOracle` contract is inherited by several other contracts, but does not declare its own [`__gap`](https://docs.openzeppelin.com/upgrades-plugins/1.x/writing-upgradeable#storage-gaps) variable. Gap variables provide a standard approach to reserve sto... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Code Maturity
### Description
## Code Review Recommendations
## 1. Update `wormhole_cctp::burn` Function
The `wormhole_cctp::burn` function should explicitly verify that `coins.value` is not zero. This is to prevent burning an invalid amount.
## 2. Update `deposit::take_bytes` Function
Add a check in the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Redundant code
### Description
The `assert(affiliateProfits[i] >= oldProfit - newProfit);` check is redundant, since the next line of code `affiliateProfits[i] -= (oldProfit - newProfit).toUint128();` will fail if condition checked is false. Consider removing redundant code. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Global Deallocation Delay May Not Be Appropriate For Different Operator Sets
### Description
The current implementation of a global `DEALLOCATION_DELAY` in the `AllocationManager` may not adequately address the diverse security requirements of different operator sets. The EigenLayer slashing upgrade introduces ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: DoS Can Close a Channel by Abusing Different Gas Limits Between Chains
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. Addressed in: `af68fc1feac5a4964538a1f295425810895479dd`. The client provided the following explanation:
> This is indeed an important issue for the cross-chain protocol. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Stable asset price could be stuck if mistakenly set with setAssetPricer()
### Description
The update introduced a `stablePrice[_asset]` mapping to track stable asset prices, while the original `assetPricer[]` tracks all other asset prices. However if any stable asset price was mistakenly set with `setAssetPric... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Add code length check for callback.target
### Description
The current implementation performs the `callback.target != address(0)` check to decide on whether to perform the callback or not. Nonetheless, `callback.target` may not be `address(0)` but an address without code (for example, an EOA), which passes the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | cross-chain | false | false | ## Gas: Fail fast in `_completeTransfer` by checking for incorrect address/chainId immediately after calling `TOKENBRIDGE.parseTransferWithPayload`
### Description
**Description:** Fail fast in `_completeTransfer` by checking for incorrect address/chainId immediately after calling `TOKENBRIDGE.parseTransferWithPayload... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: Insufficient check about division remainder
### Description
The `divARITH` subroutine uses the arithmetic state machine to perform division. The equation used is:
```
A * B + C = D * 2**256 + E
```
All of those variables are 256-bit unsigned numbers, but the equation is an equation on integers. The subroutin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Insufficient constructor parameters validation in MarginalV1LBLiquidityReceiver
### Description
The `MarginalV1LBLiquidityReceiver.checkParams` validates the constructor parameters of the contract. However, `params.treasuryAddress` and `params.lockOwner` are not validated:
1. `params.treasuryAddress` receives f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Upgradeable Contracts Should Call `_disableInitializers()`
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `05d403d3ad9c1d932c8039098b2c81d24f176d41`.
**Update:** The team has fixed the issue as recommended.
**File(s) affected:**`contracts/LCPClientIASOwnableUpgradeable.sol`, `contr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: The contract owner has too many permissions
### Description
**Description**
The rewardCutoff functionally allows the owner to change the last block number when the
user can farm rewards. It means that the owner can add a new pool, wait for investors to
invest and then change rewardCutoff to current block +... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Potential Zero Pricing For Exponential Curve
### Description
## Pool Pricing Logic Issue
In the currently implemented logic for Pool pricing, when `curve_type` is set to `Exponential` and `starting_price` is initialized to zero, the price calculation results in a continuous price of zero. This behavior may le... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent balance when supplying transfer-on-fee or deflationary tokens
### Description
_Submitted by shw, also found by cmichel_
The `supplyTokenTo` function of `SwappableYieldSource` assumes that `amount` of `_depositToken` is transferred to itself after calling the `safeTransferFrom` function (and th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | First Depositor Issue | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-sense-judging/issues/50
## Found by
ak1
## Summary
Most of the share based vault implementation will face this issue.
The vault is based on the ERC4626 where the shares are calculated based on the deposit value.
By depositing large amount as initial deposit, initial... | Sherlock | 4 | Sense |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [22] Alpha period code is still in production despite the period ending in April 2023
### Description
### Proof of Concept
Take a look at https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-zksync/blob/4f0ba34f34a864c354c7e8c47643ed8f4a250e13/code/contracts/ethereum/contracts/common/Config.sol#L35-L39
Evidently, the PRIO... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect game type can be proven and finalized due to unsafe cast
### Description
The `gameProxy.gameType().raw()` conversions used by OptimismPortal2 in the proving and finalization steps incorrectly casts the `gameType` to a `uint8` instead of a `uint32`, which causes mismatched game types to be consider... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary if statement applied in the function sweepToken
### Description
In the function `sweepToken` an if statement is made, which is triggered only if balanceToken is non zero.
This if statement is completely unnecessary, as before that another if statement is made to revert if the balance of the contrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Vulnerable, unmaintained, or deprecated dependencies in the Substrate node
### Description
The Substrate node codebase uses the following vulnerable or unmaintained Rust dependencies.
| Dependency | Version | ID | Description |
|------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|-----------... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Gauge reward period can be extended indefinitely
### Description
Any user can extend `lastUpdateTime` of a Gauge, which will effectively delay end time of current period finish. As a result, unclaimed reward amount can be stolen by late claimers.
### Impact
* Gauge reward period can be extended indefinitel... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: PublicVault does not handle funds in errorReceiver
### Description
During loan repayment in the function `LienToken.MakePayment(...)`, the process involves `LienToken` attempting to pull tokens from the user using `transferProxy.TRANSFER_PROXY.tokenTransferFromWithErrorReceiver`. The implementation in the `Tra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Crafted p2p spam can render nodes permanently unable to process L2 blocks
### Description
The constraints in `BuildBlocksValidator` are meant to prevent p2p spam from bogging down the network. However they are not sufficient for stopping spam, but are strong enough to render nodes unable to catch up.
### I... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Lack of support for fee on transfer, rebasing and tokens with balance modifications outside of transfers.
### Description
The protocol wants to work with various ERC20 tokens, but in certain cases doesn't provide the needed support for tokens that charge a fee on transfer, tokens that rebase (negatively/pos... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Same event used for multiple variables
### Description
The [`ParameterUpdated`](https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/tree/b61a9b27eb18eab5ec6bb612244d58c33f2321f2/contracts/governance/Managed.sol#L25) event of the `Managed` contracts ([including](https://github.com/graphprotocol/contracts/tree/b61a9b27eb... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: No need to compute newBalance
### Description
`newBalance` is set to `calculatedData.positionBalance - withdrawn` which is already computed and saved in `newPositionBalance`. You can save gas by assigning it to `newBalance` directly instead of recomputing the value.
### Recommendation
Apply this diff:
```diff... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
The Hifi team believes that none of the missing checks are security issues. We still recommend validating these input parameters to constrain them to valid values and reduce the attack surface.
**File(s) affected:**`packages/amm/contracts/HifiPool.sol`, `pac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [06] Don't use periods with fragments
### Description
Throughout the files, most of the comments have fragments that end with periods. They should either be converted to actual sentences with both a noun phrase and a verb phrase, or the periods should be removed.
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https:/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of using cached variable
### Description
**Severity** - Informational
**Status** - Resolved
**Location** - StakingERC1155Contract.sol
**Description**
The withdraw() and slash() functions read _s.amount from storage once more for the zero comparison even if the _amount memory variable is declared.
**R... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Swap functionality to sell rewards is too permissive and could cause accidental or intentional loss of value
### Description
While the intention is to use the 0x protocol to sell rewards, the implementation doesn't provide any basic guarantee this will correctly happen and grants the rewarder arbitrary cont... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: [11] Not Completely Using OpenZeppelin Contracts
### Description
OpenZeppelin maintains a library of standard, audited, community-reviewed, and battle-tested smart contracts. Instead of always importing these contracts, the protocol project re-implements them in some cases. This increases the amount of code th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: [09] Fix typo in docs
### Description
Low impact, info on how to have a better code documentation.
### Proof of Concept
Take a look at the Prime token's [ReadMe](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-venus/blob/b11d9ef9db8237678567e66759003138f2368d23/contracts/Tokens/Prime/README.md?plain=1#L295-L296)
Line... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Re-creation of short `memory` arrays is cheaper than fetching indecies from a storage array
### Description
Since the arrays are relatively short, it's cheaper to have a pure virtual function that [re-creates them every time](https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/66388/standard-work-around-for-using-a-s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: LACK OF THE TWO STEP OWNERSHIP TRANSFER PATTERN
### Description
The `Authorizable` contract is inherited by the `Truffles` contract and implements the `Ownable` pattern. However, the assessment revealed that the solution does not support the two-step-ownership-transfer pattern. The ownership transfer might be ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Relaying Message Without a Fee Requires Reward Address
### Description
When a message is submitted to the `TeleporterMessenger` contract, a fee is generally included that will be redeemable on the source chain by the relayer who executes the message on the destination chain. If a user wishes to relay their own... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Silo is not compatible with Fee-on-transfer or rebasing tokens
### Description
According to the documentation there are certain conditions that need to be met for a token to be whitelisted:
```
Additional tokens may be added to the Deposit Whitelist via Beanstalk governance. In order for a token to be adde... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: getAllPairsForSettings() may run out of gas
### Description
The function `getAllPairsForSettings()` has a loop over `pairsForSettings`. As the creation of pairs is permissionless, that array could get arbitrarily large. Once the array is large enough, the function will run out of gas.
**Note:** The function ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: Usage of `BalancerStrategy.updateCache` will cause single sided Loss, discount to Depositor and to OverBorrow from Singularity
### Description
The BalancerStrategy uses a cached value to determine it's balance in pool for which it takes Single Sided Exposure.
This means that the Strategy has some BPT tokens,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Trust assumption considerations
### Description
In the Zyfi Paymaster flow, each transaction involves on-chain validation of a user signature (included in `_transaction.signature`) and a Zyfi verifier signature (included in `_transaction.paymasterInput`). This implies the exchange of funds is trustless for bot... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: User should be both 'keeper` and 'owner` to be able to set `to_be_liquidated = true`
### Description
**Description**
In the 'request_withdraw function in the case when "dtv" is greater or equals to the "strategy.dtv_limit", there is a check for the 'accounts.user to be the strategy keeper. and right after ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: An incorrect interface version definition
### Description
- https://github.com/ConicFinance/protocol/blob/7a66d26ef84f93059a811a189655e17c11d95f5c/contracts/CurveHandler.sol#L183
If `interfaceVersion_ == 0`, `_version_0_remove_liquidity_one_coin` is called in `CurveHandler`.
The following pools were found... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: No Slippage Protection in buyWithReferral
### Description
When users buy tokens using the `buyWithReferral` function, they specify the token amount to buy and send the corresponding amount of ETH. There isn’t slippage protection due to the assumption that the maximum price users will pay is `tokenAmountToBu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: _depositEther Does Not Increment Validator Index,Causing All Deposits to Funnel Into First Validator and Fail Once Full
### Description
In the stPlumeMinter contract, the _depositEther() function is responsible for distributing incoming ETH deposits across available validators. This function loops through t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Risk of double-spend attacks due to use of single-node Clique consensus without finality API
### Description
l2geth uses the proof-of-authority Clique consensus protocol, defined by EIP-255. This consensus type is not designed for single-node networks, and an attacker-controlled sequencer node may produce mu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Unchecked ERC20 transfers can cause lock up
### Description
_Submitted by [axic](https://twitter.com/alexberegszaszi), also found by [gpersoon](https://twitter.com/gpersoon), [pauliax](https://twitter.com/SolidityDev), [Jmukesh](https://twitter.com/MukeshJ_eth), [a_delamo](https://twitter.com/a_delamo), [s1m0... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Bug Bounty
### Description
Formal security audits are not enough to be safe. We recommend implementing [an automated contract-based bug bounty](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/zeppelin-solidity/blob/master/contracts/Bounty.sol) and setting a period of time where security researchers from around the globe can t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Floating pragma
### Description
Contracts should be deployed with the same compiler version and flags that they have been tested with thoroughly. Locking the pragma helps to ensure that contracts do not accidentally get deployed using, for example, an outdated compiler version that might introduce bugs that af... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Truncation | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-isomorph-judging/issues/174
## Found by
0x52
## Summary
When liquidating a user, if all their collateral is taken but it is not valuable enough to repay the entire loan they would be left with remaining debt. This is what is known as bad debt because there is no co... | Sherlock | 5 | Isomorph |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use solady library where possible to save gas
### Description
The following OpenZeppelin imports have a Solady equivalent, as such they can be used to save GAS as Solady modules have been specifically designed to be as GAS efficient as possible
[4](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-05-loop/blob/0dc8467ccff2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Malicious NFT owners can rug the reservation of the long-term
### Description
Due to the long period of the long-term rent, the Homeowner has an advantage in that type of reservation, which is the ability to withdraw a part from the deposited amount by the tenant. This applies only to reservations made more... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Usage of `Errors` can reduce gas cost and contract size at PaladinRewardReserve.sol
### Description
### Target codebase
[PaladinRewardReserve.sol#L29](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-paladin/blob/9c26ec8556298fb1dc3cf71f471aadad3a5c74a0/contracts/PaladinRewardReserve.sol#L29)
[PaladinRewardReserve.sol#... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Docstrings
### Description
Throughout the [codebase](https://github.com/VenusProtocol/protocol-reserve/tree/ca8f8ba3dfcf6f13d2db4ac230ac9337950525f6/contracts), there are several parts that do not have docstrings. For instance:
* [Line 57](https://github.com/VenusProtocol/protocol-reserve/blob/ca8f8b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: UbiquityPool::mintDollar/redeemDollar collateral depeg will encourage using UbiquityPool to swap for better collateral
### Description
In the case of a depeg of an underlying collateral, UbiquityPool mechanism incentivises users to fill it up with the depegging collateral and taking out the better collatera... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Inflation Attack On Empty Vault Can DoS The Vault
### Description
The first depositor may execute an inflation attack to prevent other users from depositing. A malicious first depositor can inflate the rate between the shares and assets. This can be done by first depositing the lowest possible amount of supp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Asset manager's deposit, withdraw and rebalance function calls will get reverted when one of the adapters is broken or paused
### Description
Asset manager's deposit, withdraw and rebalance function calls will get reverted when one of the adapters is broken or paused.
### Impact
When Aave V2 Lending Pool i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Missing gas forwarding in cross-chain call
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact**: Medium, broken functionality of an important function
**Likelihood**: Medium, `TOFT_REMOVE_AND_REPAY` operation always reverts when called
**Description**
The operation `TOFT_REMOVE_AND_REPAY` is used to exit a position ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [06] `setGlobalIdOffset` / `setLocalIdOffsets` callable during claimlist phase
### Description
The functions `setGlobalIdOffset` & `setLocalIdOffsets` include the check
However, this means that they are potentially callable during the claimlist phase (namely when the claimlist begins before the mintlist, whic... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: [18] Chaining hashes with the wrong initial value
### Description
Usually, when we want to chain hashes one after another we start with the empty string hash and then hash the rest by encoding one after another like `"" || str1 || str2 || ...` and hashing them in pairs. However, in many places it is used `0` a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Mark `L1MessageManagerV1::outboxL1L2MessageStatus` as deprecated
### Description
`L1MessageManagerV1::outboxL1L2MessageStatus` is never read or written to anymore apart from the test suite:
```
$ rg "outboxL1L2MessageStatus"
test-contracts/TestL1MessageManager.sol
31: outboxL1L2MessageStatus[_messageHash] =... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: MISUSE OF HELPER METHODS
### Description
The use of the `unwrap` and `expect` function is very useful for testing environments because a value is forcibly demanded to get an error (aka `panic!`) if the "Option" does not have "Some" value or "Result". Nevertheless, leaving `unwrap` or `expect` functions in prod... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Missing Docstrings
### Description
Throughout the [codebase](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/tree/f6894bb82f78228b349267ed814375cae2fc1483/contracts/) there are several parts that do not have docstrings. For instance:
* [Line 17](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/f6894bb82f78228b349267ed814375... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: arbitraryCall() can get blocked by an attacker
### Description
_Submitted by GiveMeTestEther, also found by ScopeLift_
#### Impact
`arbitraryCall()`'s (L733) use case is to claim airdrops by "gov". If the address "who" is a token that could be send as an incentive by an attacker via `createIncentive()` th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Constraint For Penalty Multiplier And MCR
### Description
## Penalty Multiplier and MCR Guidelines
The value of `penalty_multiplier` and `MCR` should be set such that if `CR ≤ 1`, then
\[
(penalty\_multiplier \times (MCR - CR)) \geq 1.
\]
This implies that
\[
penalty\_multiplier \geq \frac{1}{(MCR - 1)}
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Unauthorized increase of `maxSellPercent`
### Description
This issue allows the `maxSellPercent` to be increased to 20% against the will of the token issuer. This will result in users being able to sell tokens even when the issuer intended to prevent selling.
### Proof of Concept
The `SecondSwap_VestingMa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Stake function shouldn’t be accessible, when the status is paused or frozen
### Description
[L-02] Stake function shouldn’t be accessible, when the status is paused or frozen
The function stake in StRSR.sol is used by users to stake a RSR amount on the corresponding RToken to earn yield and over-collateralize ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Plaintext local storage of node private key risks disclosure
### Description
As noted in the previous ConsenSys code review, Pantheon currently stores its node’s private key in plaintext, on a file on the local filesystem.
```java
public static final SECP256K1.KeyPair loadKeyPair(File keyFile) throws IOExcept... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | reentrancy | true | true |
After recreation, minipools will receive more AVAX than the sum of their owners' current stake and the rewards that they generated.
### Proof of Concept
Multipools that successfully finished validation may be recreated by multisigs, before staked GGP and deposited AVAX have been withdrawn by minipool owners ([Minipo... | Code4rena | 5 | GoGoPool |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Vulnerable Go packages
### Description
govulncheck reports that the packages used by Wormhole in table 13.1 have known vulnerabilities, which are described in the following table.
| Package | Vulnerability | Description Excerpt |
|---------------------|----------------|-------------------------------------... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Use OpenZeppelin’s safe math library
### Description
**Description**
Since the there are chances of underflow/overflow occurrences during mathematical
operations, it is recommended to use openzeppelin safemath.sol library for all mathematical
operations: openzeppelin-contracts/SafeMath.sol at master ·
OpenZep... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: SIGNATURE NONCES ARE IMPLEMENTED INCORRECTLY
### Description
In the `MinerGame` contract a nonce state variable is used to prevent signature replay attacks: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary calculation of variable
### Description
In the following function calculation of `allowanceNew` can be moved inside `if` block to save gas:
https://github.com/CreamFi/compound-protocol/blob/23a4ae93adc70334553f5a83429a4e967c1eefaa/contracts/CCollateralCapErc20.sol#L379
### Recommendation
We recomm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Code could be simplified.
### Description
**Description**
StakingB_1.sol Line 609
“pool.lastRewardBlock = block.number” can be executed before condition so this operation
shouldn’t be repeated twice in the code.
**Recommendation**:
Use just one realisation of “pool.lastRewardBlock = block.number” before con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: User can trade away an asset using Balancer batchSwap without removing it from account
### Description
Balancer's `batchSwap()` function takes in an `amount` of tokens to trade at each step of the swap. This amount can actually exceed the amount returned from the previous step. Because BalancerController.so... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect reserve amount handling during deposit
### Description
In the `BunniHubLogic` contract, there is an issue concerning the usage of outdated reserve amounts during the deposit process. Specifically, when the hooklet is invoked at line 193, the `amount` parameter sent does not reflect the actual depo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Potential error `Index out of range`
### Description
In methods:
- `estimateAdjustPosition` at the line https://github.com/Grandthrax/yearnV2-generic-lender-strat/blob/979ef2f0e5da39ca59a5907c37ba2064fcd6be82/contracts/Strategy.sol#L267:
`_potential = lenders[_highest].aprAfterDeposit(toAdd)`
- `adjustPos... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Compromised treasury address can permanently block updates and steal protocol funds
### Description
### Impact
Permanent `fund loss` and the protocol being stuck in an `unrecoverable state`.
If the treasury address gets compromised (e.g., private key stolen or malicious insider), the attacker gains full cont... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: UniV2Adapter#getExecutionData doesn't properly handle native ETH swaps
### Description
UniV2Adapter#getExecutionData doesn't properly account for native ETH trades which makes them impossible. Neither method selected supports direct ETH trades, and sender/target are not set correctly for TradingUtils_execut... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use ``assembly`` to write _address storage values_
### Description
2 results - 2 files:
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-timeswap/blob/main/packages/v2-pool/src/base/OwnableTwoSteps.sol#L19
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-timeswap/blob/main/packages/v2-token/src/TimeswapV2Token.sol#L42
**Recom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `AllowList::hasTradeRestriction` mutability should be set to `view`
### Description
`AllowList::hasTradeRestriction` does not make any changes to storage, it simply reads some variables and makes some checks, but the function's mutability is not marked as view.
### Recommendation
Change mutability to view. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Additional approval for selling GBT.
### Description
**Description**
ERC20BondingCurve.sol
Performing selling GBT requires the user to approve his GBT for GBT contract (ERC20Bonding Curve) before selling. This happens due to an external call to address(this) in Line 240, where ERC20Bonding Curve becomes msg.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Notes
### Description
* [NOTE: Non-functional requirements.](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PZBSCBWBwd6AqWCgXqLnw8FNQ4HRurP5usrXuKuU0a0/edit#heading=h.cxu58g3o6qej)
* [NOTE: Micropayment Channel example is not written.](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PZBSCBWBwd6AqWCgXqLnw8FNQ4HRurP5usrXuKuU0a0/edit#h... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: [14] Unauthorized actors can sidestep their restrictions and still integrate with Wildcat
### Description
### Proof of Concept
Take a look at https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-08-wildcat/blob/fe746cc0fbedc4447a981a50e6ba4c95f98b9fe1/src/WildcatArchController.sol#L245-L251
This function is used to register ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Solidity safe pragma best practices are not used
### Description
Always use a stable pragma to be certain that you deterministically compile the Solidity code to the same bytecode every time. Also `IStargateReceiver` and `IStargateRouter` interfaces are using an old compiler version - upgrade it to a newer ver... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Use `Ownable2Step` Version Rather Than `Ownable` Version
### Description
The `Ownable2Step` prevents the contract ownership from mistakenly being transferred to an address that cannot handle it (e.g. due to a typo in the address), by requiring that the recipient of the owner's permissions actively accept via a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Users' Native Tokens Can Get Stuck
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `01de7717898b17b22fd13167b09b91d7c3f44040`.
A refund mechanism was included.
**File(s) affected:**`BreederTimeLockPool.sol`
**Description:**`BreederTimeLockPool.crossChainClaimReward()` will accep... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: stETH/ETH chainlink oracle has too long of heartbeat and deviation threshold which can cause loss of funds
### Description
getTknOhmPrice uses the stETH/ETH chainlink oracle to calculate the current price of the OHM token. This token valuation is used to determine the amount of stETH to skim from the user r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Potential Re-Entrancy Attack in the Crowdinvesting Contract ✓ Fixed
### Description
The attack requires a set of pre-requisites:
1. The currency token should have a re-entrancy opportunity inside the token transfer.
2. The re-entrancy can be done on a token transfer from the `_msgSender()` to the `feeCollect... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: When contractNonce occupies more than 12bytes the truncated nonce shared back with the contract offerer through ratifyOrder would be smaller than the actual stored nonce
### Description
When `contractNonce` occupies more than 12 bytes, the truncated nonce shared back with the contract offerer through `ratifyOr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Rewards can be locked in Bribe contract because distributing them depends on base token reward amount and `Gauge.deliverBribes()` is not always called by `Voter.distribute()`
### Description
_Submitted by unforgiven_
[Voter.sol#L315-L329](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-velodrome/blob/7fda97c570b758b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The uncheckedIncrement() code is not efficient
### Description
**Description:**
In various places a loop construct is used as below:
The resulting bytecode is actually unoptimized compared to an inline unchecked block. This
creates a jump and several additional opcodes as overhead.
**Team response:**
Fixed | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | oracle | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-blueberry-judging/issues/161
## Found by
8olidity, 0xChinedu, rvierdiiev, obront, sakshamguruji, Saeedalipoor01988
## Summary
In some extreme cases, oracles can be taken offline or token prices can fall to zero. In these cases, liquidations will be frozen (all call... | Sherlock | 5 | Blueberry |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `maxWithdraw()` underestimates assets for the `feeRecipient`
### Description
_Acknowledged_
The `EulerEarn.maxWithdraw()` function is designed to return the maximum amount of the underlying asset that can be withdrawn from the owner's balance in the vault, through a withdraw call. this function first accrues ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `quorum` and `threshold` should be <= 100%
### Description
Constructor, `updateQuorum()` and `updateThreshold()`: `quorum` and `threshold` should be <= 100%. A value corresponding to 100% should be added as a constant: https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/borg-core/blob/9074503d37cfa1d777ef16f6c88b84c98b4f54eb/src/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Mowing between two consecutive floods results in loss of rewards related to the second flood
### Description
If a user mows between two consecutive floods and then mows again after the season of the second flood, they will not receive SoP rewards related to the second flood. They will only receive SoP rewards ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | true | ## Low: epochVoteStart function calls the wrong library method
### Description
The `epochVoteStart` function calls the `VelodromeTimeLibrary.epochStart` function instead of the `VelodromeTimeLibrary.epochVoteStart` function. Thus, the `Voter.epochVoteStart` function returns a voting start time without factoring in the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Optimization
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `90fec78e6635edfac73b4a770d43a110fbb31b27`. The client provided the following explanation:
> we've opted to keep the require statements instead of custom errors due to the level of code changes it will bring we are fine wit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Overwrite orderIdByHash for Duplicate Orders
### Description
Description
When orders are made they are given an orderId and a helper mapping orderIdByHash which takes the hash
of the order and returns the orderId .
If two orders are made with the same hashOrder() value, then the value orderIdByHash will be ove... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `f7cf4a6c70effa5623795ffbb4fff7b3ad41c3a5`. The client provided the following explanation:
> We've added the missing validations to the contracts. defaultGasFee: While we’re not enforcing limits at the contract ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Balancer Vault Will Receive Fewer Assets As The Current Design Does Not Serve The Interest Of Vault Shareholders
### Description
The current implementation of reinvesting reward function does not benefit the vault shareholders as the current design does not serve the vault shareholder's interest well. Thus,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Inline small `private` functions only called once
### Description
`StandardToken::_updateName` and `_updateSymbol` are very small `private` functions that are only ever called once by `updateNameAndSymbol`.
Hence it is more gas efficient to inline them; here is an implementation that also caches the identica... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.