prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Public functions not called by the contract should be declared external instead
### Description
Contracts are allowed to override their parents’ functions and change the visibility from external to public and can save gas by doing so.
`setAllowedMsgSenders`
- [AllowedMsgSenders.sol#L15](https://github.com/pr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Be aware of precompiles
### Description
## Security Advisory
**Severity:** Low Risk
**Context:** `BridgeFacet.sol#L785-L840`
**Description:**
The external calls by `_executeCalldata()` could call a precompile. Different chains have creative precompile implementations, so this could in theory pose probl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Referrals Might Be Able to Claim Their Fees When Not Supposed to
### Description
In case the `requiredToken` in ReferralSystem is changed, there might be a window where referrals could be able to claim their fees when they are not supposed to.
Example:
The required token is ETH and `minimumBalance` is 1e18 b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Allocation Functionality Does Not Explicitly Validate Non-Existing Strategy Address
### Description
**Update**
**Quantstamp:** The Sperax team implemented the verification mechanism to reject non-allowlisted strategy addresses.
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `acafbef7b12ecbdf13abd9... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Logic of `FiveFiftyRule::checkCanTransfer` and `FiveFiftyRule::canTransfer` can subtle differ
### Description
**Description:** There are subtle differences in the `checkCanTransfer` and `canTransfer` functions on the `FiveFiftyRule` contract that could make the result of the execution on both of them differ.
T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Missing slippage protection in trade closure
### Description
The closeTradeMarketCallback function (OstiumTradingCallback.sol) lacks slippage protection for the amount of collateral a trader receives when closing their position. When a trade closure is fulfilled (via a trusted forwarder), market conditions ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing implementation for EigenPod `withdrawNonBeaconChainETHBalanceWei` in CasimirManager
### Description
EigenLayer has a function `EigenPod::withdrawNonBeaconChainETHBalanceWei` that is intended to be called by the pod owner to sweep any ETH donated to EigenPod. Currently, there seems to be no way to with... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: In general a contract offerer or a zone cannot draw a conclusion accurately based on the spent offer amounts or received consideration amounts shared with them post-trasnfer
### Description
When one calls one of the Seaport endpoints that fulfills or matches a collection of (advanced) orders, the used offer or... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: cancelMultiple() checks status twice
### Description
When canceling multiple streams using the `cancelMultiple()` function, we loop over the streams and perform the following check and action:
```solidity
if (getStatus(streamId) == Lockup.Status.ACTIVE && isCancelable(streamId)) {
_cancel(streamId);
}
```
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Code Refactoring
### Description
As `calculate_points_for_level` will never overflow within `u128`, it may be more efficient to simplify the calculations with a predefined constant array (`POINTS_FOR_LEVEL`) which directly holds the points required for each level.
> _ example rust
### Remediation
Incorporat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Bypassing `maxTokensPerUser` limits for ERC721 DAO
### Description
When users call `buyGovernanceTokenERC721DAO()` code performs max cap checks and then calls `mintToken()`. The issue is that there's no reentrancy guard and when code wants to mint tokens one by one by using `_safeMint()` user can reenter the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistencies in Event Emitting Pattern
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation: We are avoiding changing the order of variables of the events, because these contracts have been live for some time and there might be third party services... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | rounding | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-surge-judging/issues/125
## Found by
0Kage, ck, usmannk, Ace-30, CRYP70, ak1, 0x52, chaduke, chainNue, dingo, rvi, ctf\_sec, carrot, unforgiven, y1cunhui, Chinmay, gryphon, GimelSec, peanuts, Bobface, gandu, Juntao, TrungOre, MalfurionWhitehat, cccz, Cryptor, VAD37, ... | Sherlock | 5 | Surge |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary duplicate state logic
### Description
**Description:** The offer status is set two times to the same value in function `performUpkeep` and `sendFunctionsRequest`.
Note that this kind of duplicate logic can cause a security issue in the future, e.g. the team might miss changing one of the two occure... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: No need `assert` check in `_computeAssetAmounts()`
### Description
The `assert` check in this function is not needed. Because this check will always be true because of this line:
`postFeeAmount = assets - feeAmount;`
**Context:** | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Users may unintentionally remove liquidity under a phishing attack.
### Description
The `removeLiquidity` function in `Pools.sol` uses `tx.origin` to determine the person who wants to remove liquidity. However, such a design is dangerous since the pool assumes that this function is called from the router, whi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Lack of slippage protection in liquidity functions
### Description
**Description:** The `addLiquidity` and `removeLiquidity` functions do not include any form of slippage protection, such as `minSharesOut` or `minTokensOut` parameters. This means users cannot guard against receiving significantly fewer shares ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: [WP-H7] `InsuranceFund#syncDeps()` may cause users' fund loss
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
The `Governance` address can call `InsuranceFund.sol#syncDeps()` to change the contract address of `vusd` anytime.
However, since the tx to set a new address for `vusd` can get in between users' txs to d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | true | ## Medium: Missing blacklist check in createBatchStream()
### Description
A blacklist for token IDs has been added to the `createStream()` function of the StreamingNFT contract. However, the `createBatchStream()` function, which performs the same logic in a loop over multiple IDs, does not include this blacklist check... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use low level `call()` to prevent gas griefing attacks when returned data not required
### Description
**Description:** Using `call()` when the returned data is not required unnecessarily exposes to gas griefing attacks from huge returned data payload. For [example](https://github.com/Earnft/smart-contracts/bl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Code Maturity
### Description
## Code Review Summary
1. In `refresh_one_price`, the `price_info` account is expected to be associated with a valid oracle mapping in the `oracle_mappings` account. Thus, if `price_info.key()` is equal to `Pubkey::default()`, the program should abort, as it indicates `price_info... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent bidding timelines
### Description
The codebase lacks clear separation of time windows for bidding and settling the auctions.
1. **For English auctions:**
- At `timestamp == listingEnd`, it is possible to call `settleAuction()`, but it is not possible to call `cancelListing()`.
- `cancelList... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: [17] Constants/Immutables redefined elsewhere
### Description
Consider defining in only one contract so that values cannot become out of sync when only one location is updated. A [cheap way](https://medium.com/coinmonks/gas-cost-of-solidity-library-functions-dbe0cedd4678) to store constants/immutables in a sin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Checks for address of operations (&) that are going to be dereferenced immediately by the compiler.
### Description
**Description**
club-program/src/instructions/support_club.rs
Line. 101. Suggests that the receiver of the expression borrows the expression.
**Recommendation**:
Change this to ctx.program_id | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Different Threshold can result in different hash but same config when using one owner
### Description
**Impact**
When calling `createSystemInstance`, a Safe with a single owner could be deployed, while passing a threshold that is above 1
Because of the check `if (instance.owners.length > 1) {` the threshold ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `timeoutPacket()` and `timeoutOnClose()` Incorrectly Enforce an Open Channel State
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `3b309dd6b4fd6339973c47979db114754387ef2b`.
**File(s) affected:**`IBCChannelPacketTimeout.sol`
**Description:** As the protocol is intended to suppor... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: forceDeallocatePenalty should not be set to 0 to avoid anyone to deallocate all the funds from the
### Description
## Adapters
**Severity:** Medium Risk
**Context:** VaultV2.sol#L90
**Description:** When `mapping(address adapter => uint256) public forceDeallocatePenalty;` is set to zero for an adapter,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: Theft of ETH of free floating SLOT holders
### Description
A malicious user can steal all claimable ETH belonging to free floating SLOT holders...
### Proof of Concept
Run it in the test suite with forge
### Tools Used
Manual review / forge
### Recommended Mitigation Steps
`+=` operator instead of `=` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | initialization | true | true | ## Difficulty: Low
## Type: Timing
## Description
The asset vault and promissory note ERC-721 tokens are minted via the `_mint` function rather than the `_safeMint` function. The `_safeMint` function includes a necessary safety check that validates a recipient contract’s ability to receive and handle ERC-721 tokens. Wi... | TrailOfBits | 5 | Arcade.xyz V3 |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | input-validation | true | false | ## Low: Lack of user-defined slippage and deadline parameters in `StakingContract::swapForQI` may result in unfavorable `QI` token swaps
### Description
When a user interacts with `StakingContract` to provision a hosted node, they can choose between two methods:[`StakingContract::stakeWithAVAX`](https://code.zeeve.net... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: The checks-effects-interactions pattern is not respected
### Description
The checks-effects-interactions is a pattern that is used to avoid direct reentrancy attacks. This pattern is currently violated throughout the contract. An example is in the redeem function where the `paymentToken` is transferred to the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: New rounds can start while current round is active, trapping funds
### Description
_Resolved_
`startNewRound()` is used to initiate a new round for a specific market.
As you can see, it does not check if a round is currently ongoing and increases `currentRoundId`. The issue is that `endRound()` relies on the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `MembershipFactory::owpWallet` lacks explicitly declared visibility
### Description
[`MembershipFactory::owpWallet`](https://github.com/OneWpOrg/audit-2024-10-oneworld/blob/416630e46ea6f0e9bd9bdd0aea6a48119d0b515a/contracts/dao/MembershipFactory.sol#L20) has no declared visibility:
```solidity
address owpWall... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing URI and URL prefix validation
### Description
The `authority` of each `endo_avs` account is entitled to change the `name` and the `url` through the `update` method, as follows:
`- programs/endoavs-program/src/contexts/manage.rs`
```
impl UpdateEndoAVSInfo {
pub fn update(&mut self, name: Option, u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Code could be simplified.
### Description
**Description**
StakingB_1.sol Line 609
“pool.lastRewardBlock = block.number” can be executed before condition so this operation
shouldn’t be repeated twice in the code.
**Recommendation**:
Use just one realisation of “pool.lastRewardBlock = block.number” before con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: No MEV protection on sequencer
### Description
The (centralized) sequencer, or sequencers of the future, are not prevented in any way to extract arbitrary MEV from transactions.
### Recommendation
There are experimental approaches to MEV prevention for sequencers and other block producers. There are of course... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: UniswapV3 Pool address can be computed locally
### Description
UniswapV3 deploys pools deterministically, which means that their addresses can be computed locally by using the token addresses and the fee.
Instead of externally querying `IUniswapV3Factory.getPool()`, pool addresses can be using the [`PoolAddr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect comment on `TransferredDelegation` event
### Description
In relation to L03, the `TransferredDelegation` event
- is incorrectly commented that the withdrawn tickets are transferred to the caller / delegator wallet
- lacks a description about the `to` indexed parameter. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Function `distribute()` in CuratorRewardsDistributor is prone to frontrunning
### Description
In the CuratorRewardsDistributor contract, any user can call the `distribute()` function through the frontend (as seen on the [demo site](https://base-sepolia.terminal.phiprotocol.xyz/cred/137)). The user would earn 1... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: `RevenueHandler.checkpoint` isn't correctly
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/RewardsDistributor.sol
Impacts:
- Theft of unclaimed yield
## Description
## Brief/Intro
`RevenueHandler.checkpoint` isn't correctly when `token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Potential for Disrupted Access Control Due to Registry Mismatch
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> The recommendation provided in the report was one of the original thoughts when designing the system. But we chose to not implement it this way... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: MagicLpAggregator always returns lower than correct answer, leading to arbitrage loss
### Description
MagicLpAggregator is used to price LP tokens for "closely-tied" underlying tokens. It calculates the price below:
function latestAnswer() public view override returns (int256) {
uint256 baseAnswerNomal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Use of `transferFrom` over `safeTransferFrom()` in NFT transfers
### Description
_Resolved_
Reference Finding: https://solodit.cyfrin.io/issues/fuel1-5-use-safetransferfrom-instead-of-transferfrom-for-erc721-transfers-hexens-none-fuel-markdown
The `PacketStore` contract utilizes the transferFrom method to tr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: `LibSilo.transferStalk()` uses incorrect formula to roundUp
### Description
It calculates proportional amount of Roots to transfer when transfers Stalk to another account. It wants to roundUp the division, however it's done incorrectly:
```solidity
function transferStalk(address sender, address recipien... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Stack variable used as a cheaper cache for a state variable is only used once
### Description
If the variable is only accessed once, it’s cheaper to use the state variable directly that one time, and save the 3 gas the extra stack assignment would spend:
`_shortPayout`
- [PrePOMarket.sol#L82](https://github.c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | upgrade | false | false | ## Low: Upgradeable contracts which are inherited from should use ERC7201 namespaced storage layouts or storage gaps to prevent storage collisions
### Description
The protocol has upgradeable contracts which other contracts inherit from. These contracts should either use:
* [ERC7201](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Excessive code coupling
### Description
During a transfer of Pool Tokens, the balance [gets added to the recipient’s committed draw tree](https://github.com/pooltogether/pooltogether-contracts/tree/78ac6863f4616269f7d04a0ddd1d60bdfc454937/contracts/ERC777Pool.sol#L459). If the recipient does not have any commi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Allocation size is unbounded, which can cause overflow revert in `getDistributions()`
### Description
A new feature in Splits V2 is that, rather than allocations being required to total a given `totalAllocation` amount, the `totalAllocation` amount is inferred from the `allocations`.
The `allocations` for a g... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: `_unwrap` in `MultiInvoker.sol` can revert every time in some cases which will make the users not being able to `_liquidate` or `_withdraw` with `warp` to true
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-07-perennial-judging/issues/22
## Found by
Vagner
`_withdraw` makes some wrong ass... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: New `PairFundingFeesV2` parameters are not validated
### Description
During the initialization of new funding fee parameters in the `initializeV2()` function, these values are not sanity-checked against the given maximum values.
Since a sanity check is performed in other setter functions when the `PairFunding... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | ZkSync | true | false | ## Severity: High Risk
## Context
ZkSyncHubConnector.sol#L49-L72
## Description
For ZkSync chain, L2 to L1 communication is free, but L1 to L2 communication requires a certain amount of ETH to be supplied to cover the base cost of the transaction (including the `_l2Value`) + layer 2 operator tip.
The `sendMessage` f... | Spearbit | 5 | Connext |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: The LayerZero implementation contract is the receiver of DAOs fees on cross-chain buy operations
### Description
Whenever a cross-chain DAO is created via `createCrossChainERC20DAO()` or `createCrossChainERC721DAO()`, it assigns the `ownerAddress` as the `msg.sender`. The problem is that the `msg.sender` will... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Reduce copy-pasted code amount
### Description
There are a lot of places when rebases' logic code is copy-pasted:
- https://github.com/abyssfinance/abyss-lockup/blob/8fe1a854a9b01dc1aa35272b82fd22655d4f42d1/contracts/AbyssSafe3.sol#L223-L239
- https://github.com/abyssfinance/abyss-lockup/blob/8fe1a854a9b01... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Absence of Minimum delayBlocks
### Description
The owner can accidentally set `delayBlocks` to `0` (or a very small delay block), which will collapse the whole fraud protection mechanism. Since there is no check for a minimum delay before setting a new delay value, even a low value will be accepted by the `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | true | ## Low: RFQ Fee Calculation Errors
### Description
The function `verifyRFQFee()` uses `totalLegAmount` to calculate the `maxAllowedTradeFee` by multiplying it with the base price instead of the actual option trade price. Depending on the base price in comparison to the options asset trade price, this could result in h... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Dividend Calculation Uses Stale Token Balance in Subsequent `update()` Calls After `fees_deposit` with DRVS
### Description
**Description:** The `fees_deposit()` function calls `client_community_state.update()` before `client_state.sub_crncy_tokens()`, causing `self.header.drvs_tokens` to be updated with a sta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: SDK function _randomHex returns low-quality randomness
### Description
The Meson protocol software development kit (SDK) uses the `_randomHex` function to generate random salts for new swaps. This function accepts a string length as input and produces a random hexadecimal string of that length. To do that, `_r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Active LP may not be able to provide more liquidity
### Description
The `lpDeposit()` function is called by liquidity providers (LPs) to deposit initial principal, add more principal, or adjust their risk percentage. However, due to the highlighted `require` check, an active LP won't be able to deposit more... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `StrategyPUSDConvex.balanceOfJPEG()`: use a `return` statement instead of `break`
### Description
See `@audit` tag:
Here, instead of making a memory operation with `availableBalance += extraReward.earned();` and then using `break;` before returning the memory variable `availableBalance`, it would've been mor... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `DistributionManagerSetup::canDistribute` should return false rather than reverting
### Description
**Description:** `DistributionManagerSetup::canDistribute` currently returns true if distribution can proceed but reverts from within `_validateCanDistribute()` if it cannot:
Rather than reverting, this view f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Cross positions that exceed the allowed margin can be opened
### Description
When users opens a cross order it's capped to a value. However, because of the math users can loop and maintain a position that's more than the allowed margin.
### Impact
Since the actual margin is higher than the max allowed by "... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Peggo takes an Ethereum private key as a command-line argument
### Description
Certain Peggo commands take an Ethereum private key (`--eth-pk`) as a command-line argument. If an attacker gained access to a user account on a system running Peggo, the attacker would also gain access to any Ethereum private ke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Secondary markets for LP tokens are problematic
### Description
**Description:** Unlike other AMM implementations, where fees are accrued in the LP token, Solidly V2 implements an accrual system where the fees are tracked in `feeGrowthGlobal0`/`1` per LP token. Each liquidity provider can call `SolidlyV2Pair::... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Malicious users can execute swaps without sandwiching protection to exfiltrate leveraged funds
### Description
Arkis allows users to execute their own transactions as long as they match a specific set of validation criteria. However, sandwiching protection is not enforced by Pendle’s swap validator at any poin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: [05] Intent state mutates before permit succeeds, causing irreversible nonce burns
### Description
### Vulnerability details
`depositToIntentWithPermit` calls `_verifyAndMarkIntent` before invoking `IERC20Permit.permit`. `_verifyAndMarkIntent` marks the digest as used and increments `nonces[user]`.
**Attack ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: `LybraEUSDVaultBase.superLiquidation()`: Confusing code comments deviates from function logic
### Description
### Impact
In code comments of `superLiquidation()`, it is mentioned that deposit of borrower (collateral) will be reduced by collateral amount * borrower's collateral ratio. This is inaccurate, as t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: [14] Avoid Nested `if` Blocks
### Description
For better readability and analysis it is better to avoid nested `if` blocks. Here is an example:
### 14.1 FETH.sol (lines [482-492](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-foundation/blob/792e00df42/contracts/FETH.sol#L482-L492))
After edit:
**[HardlyDifficult (... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: [42] Unused named return
### Description
Declaring named returns, but not using them, is confusing to the reader. Consider either completely removing them (by declaring just the type without a name), or remove the return statement and do a variable assignment. This would improve the readability of the code, an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: TitlesGraph::acknowledgeEdge() methods do not write acknowledgments to storage
### Description
When `acknowledgeEdge()` is called, the downstream call to the `_setAcknowledged()` method caches `edges[edgeId_]` in memory, instead of storage, which does not preserve changes to the `Edge` struct after the tran... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `OUSGInstantManager` redemptions will be bricked if BlackRock deploys a new `BUIDLRedeemer` contract and sunsets the existing one
### Description
The `BUIDLRedeemer` contract is a very new contract; it is very possible that in the future a new version of the contract will be deployed and the current version wi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Unchecked Return Value
### Description
**Update**
The return value is now checked.
**File(s) affected:**`UserProxy.sol`
**Description:** Most functions will return a `true` or `false` value upon success. It is important to ensure that every necessary function is checked.
`UserProxy.deposit()` does not check... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: FORMAL ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
### Description
The project is written in Rust and utilizes the Anchor framework to improve code clarity and security. While the program generally makes effective use of Rust and Anchor, some areas could be enhanced to better align with common Solana development conventions an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: PAYING OFF DEBT WITH SPIGOT EARNING IN ETHER IS NOT POSSIBLE
### Description
In the `SpigotedLoan` contract, the borrower can add spigots with revenue contracts that will support repayment of the debt. The revenue contract earns revenue tokens that later can be exchanged for the credit tokens using the `claim... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Miscellaneous Swell General Comments
### Description
This section details miscellaneous findings discovered by the testing team that do not have direct security implications:
1. **helpers.sol**
- Typo: On line [70] "outout" should read "output".
2. **swNFTv1.sol**
- Several variables are commented out ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: [02] `InitialETHCrowdfund`'s initial contribution does not allow passing "gateData"
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-party/blob/b23c65d62a20921c709582b0b76b387f2bb9ebb5/contracts/crowdfund/InitialETHCrowdfund.sol#L149
At initialization time, `InitialETHCrowdfund` allows for the caller to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Failure to pass \_withdraw_only to \_getBalanceTXs allows any withdrawing user to drain vault assets through sandwich attack
### Description
**Details**
[AdapterVault.vy#L1045-L1060](https://github.com/adapter-fi/AdapterVault/blob/3c2895a69ad5eb2c4be16d454f63a6f2f074f351/contracts/AdapterVault.vy#L1045-L1060... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: LACK OF UPPER LIMIT CHECKS MAY CAUSE RESOURCE EXHAUSTION
### Description
The `change_maximum_era_count_of_unwithdrawn_reward()` function in \"appchain-anchor/src/user\_actions/settings\_manager.rs\" doesn’t check for an upper limit to the passed value before setting it, allowing the owner to pass a big enough ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Improper Emitting of Events
### Description
The `RocketDAOProposal.add()` and `RocketDAOProposal.execute()` functions emit the events `ProposalAdded` and `ProposalExecuted` respectively. Both these functions utilize `msg.sender` as the proposer or executor argument. If these functions are called via the `Rocke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Lack Of Event Emission
### Description
It has been observed that Blueprint and Remote Registry functionalities are missing emitting events.
Events are a method of informing the transaction initiator about the actions taken by the called function. It logs its emitted parameters in a specific log history, which... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Possible incorrect initialization
### Description
In `CumulativeMerkleDropXXX` constructor `token_` can be zero address:
https://github.com/1inch/cumulative-merkle-drop/tree/96fb63d0cbfea73603e7500961c71e8ab1fb8c10/contracts/CumulativeMerkleDrop128.sol#L21
https://github.com/1inch/cumulative-merkle-drop/tre... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Consider using an array of comments for function `depositBatch()`
### Description
The function `depositBatch()` does not allow each deposit to have a separate comment. Consider passing a comments array as well. There does not seem to be a problem with the current contracts in-scope but support can be extended ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Potential risk of double-free memory
### Description
The issue has been identified within the [freeMemory](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/70b15ec4d9e7578248141604503843716a67d875/src/HanjiTrie.sol#L1274) function of the `HanjiTrie` contract.
Currently, there is no check to verify whethe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: User will Received Less Amount Of Numa
### Description
User will lose some Numa due to precision loss whenever user calls `NumaPrinter::burnAssetInputToNuma`.
### Impact
User will get less amount when they try to exchange NuAsset to NUMA.
### Recommendation
Consider changing the precision to 1e18 or bigge... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | true | ## Low: Missing negative tests for several assertions
### Description
The Paraspace protocol consists of numerous interacting components, and each operation is validated by checks that are widely dispersed throughout the codebase. Therefore, a robust suite of negative test cases is necessary to prevent vulnerabilities... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Pool.sol & Synth.sol: Failing Max Value Allowance
### Description
## Handle
hickuphh3
## Vulnerability details
### Impact
In the `_approve` function, if the allowance passed in is `type(uint256).max`, nothing happens (ie. allowance will still remain at previous value). Contract integrations (DEXes for ex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Voting manipulation cause by the possibility to transfer veNFT
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/zerolend/governance
Impacts:
- Manipulation of governance voting result deviating from voted outcome and resulting in a direct change from intended effect of original result... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Validate the `to` email as you do for the `from` one
### Description
In `DKIMRecoverySigValidator::_verifyHeaders` the `from` mail is validated in a way that protects from the email that looks like "fake@gmail.com@gmail.com". The check is not done for the `to` mail and can be added by slicing the string up unt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: NatSpec `@param` is missing
### Description
### Relevant GitHub Links
https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-07-foundry-defi-stablecoin/blob/main/src/DSCEngine.sol
*Instances (33)*: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | logic | true | false | ## Medium: supply in the zerolocker.sol is incorrectly increased during merge_type actions
### Description
Users are able to create locks, deposit tokens for already created locks, increase lock amount/time, and merge two different locks in the ZeroLocker contract. The `supply` public variable in this contract tracks ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: All data in \_userLoans mapping will not be deleted after calling deleteUserLoan
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://testnet.snowtrace.io/address/0x2cAa1315bd676FbecABFC3195000c642f503f1C9
Impacts:
* Contract fails to deliver promised returns, but doesn't lose value
## Description
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
Addressed in: `0607bc4cb017455c5bdd039beb24f71c7b944fd3`, `3229ba50c4954830b9664276797ed1fbbd812bf9`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Added the necessary validations. serviceFee can be zero as there might be a chance we might not charge in t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Usage of `uints`/`ints` smaller than 32 bytes (256 bits) incurs overhead
### Description
> When using elements that are smaller than 32 bytes, your contract’s gas usage may be higher. This is because the EVM operates on 32 bytes at a time. Therefore, if the element is smaller than that, the EVM must use more o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Nobody can cast for any proposal
### Description
[[castVote](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-01-olympus-on-chain-governance/blob/main/bophades/src/external/governance/GovernorBravoDelegate.sol#L369)](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-01-olympus-on-chain-governance/blob/main/bophades/src/external... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: Attacker can censor liquidity providers deposits and withdrawals by front-running
### Description
The `depositFor` and `withdraw` functions in Omnipool require that the address to which funds will be deposited/withdrawn has not executed deposit or withdraw transactions in the current block number. In `deposit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: stRWIP is always minted for RWIP in a 1:1 ratio
### Description
For staking RWIP, users always receive stRWIP in a 1:1 ratio. For burning 1 stRWIP, they receive RWIP according to the current exchange rate, which is going to be above 1:1 because of rewards deposited into RWIPStaking. Therefore, the attacker ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Insufficient restrictions in `instantOpenPacket()` risk DOS
### Description
In `Packet.sol` a user can call `initiateBurn` with `params.BurnType` set to `BurnType.INSTANT_OPEN_PACKET`.
```solidity
if (params.burnType == BurnType.INSTANT_OPEN_PACKET) {
randomAllocationPool.instantOpenPacket(params.packetId... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Inaccessible pause mechanism in WrappedBitcornNativeOFTAdapter
### Description
The `WrappedBitcornNativeOFTAdapter.sol` contract inherits `ERC20PausableUpgradeable` but fails to implement the `pause()` and `unpause()` functions. Due to the absence of these functions, pausing the protocol during emergencies ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Protocol does not refund extra ETH but implements strict check
### Description
[See spec here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-taiko/blob/f58384f44dbf4c6535264a472322322705133b11/packages/protocol/contracts/bridge/IBridge.sol#L105)
The IBridge.sol contract specifies that extra ETH provided when sending ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Unchecked in `for` loop is default behaviour since 0.8.22
### Description
Starting from Solidity compiler version 0.8.22, the use of unchecked for iterating variables in loops is no longer necessary. The compiler now includes optimizations that automatically handle overflow checks for these variables. Previous... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Logic Flaw in Time Check
### Description
## Issue with is_block_flowback_end_time_ok Function
The function `is_block_flowback_end_time_ok` is checking the condition incorrectly. If `block_flowback_end_time` is zero, the first condition (`block_flowback_end_time != 0`) evaluates to false, and the function wil... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.