prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Immutable addresses lack zero-address check
### Description
Constructors should check the address written in an immutable address variable is not the zero address
### Proof of Concept
Instances include:
#### InfinityExchange.sol
[WETH = \_WETH](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-infinity/blob/765376fa23... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Centralization Risks in Emergency Scenarios
### Description
This issue has been identified within the overall design of the `SelfPeggingAsset` contract.
The contract lacks an emergency redemption mechanism for users to withdraw their tokens when losses from exchange rate fluctuations exceed the buffer cap... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Potential Revert on Zero Bribe Amount
### Description
In `Locker.bribe()`, when the locker is staked, the function computes `bribeAmount` and calls `Locker._bribe()` unconditionally. If `bribeAmount` equals zero (for example, when `_percentage` is zero, rounding down to zero, or no rewards were claimed), the d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Verify period is always a multiple of week
### Description
The calculations with `period` assume that `period` is a multiple of `WEEK`. However, `period` is often assigned as a parameter and not verified if it is a multiple of `WEEK`. This calculation may cause unexpected results.
**Note:** When it is verifie... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: End epoch cannot be triggered preventing winners to withdraw
### Description
### Impact
At the end of an epoch, the [triggerEndEpoch(...)](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-y2k-finance/blob/2175c044af98509261e4147edeb48e1036773771/src/Controller.sol#L198) is called to trigger 'epoch end without depeg eve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Consider having limit on gas fee charged
### Description
There is no limit to the gas fee charged. While it is claimed that “there are no incentives for the executors”, in reality, executors can be indirectly incentivised by inflating the gas price so that they will be credited a higher fee.
The fee can be as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Verifier is using a draft version of OpenZeppelin contracts
### Description
The EIP1271Verifier contract currently uses a draft version of the OpenZeppelin contracts. Since EIP-712 has been finalized and is no longer in draft state, it would be more appropriate to use the standard version of EIP-712.
### Recom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Some vesting recipients temporarily won't be able to claim
### Description
**Impact:**
Medium, as funds will be locked for 30 days
**Likelihood:**
Medium, because it will only happen when the cliff is < 30 day
**Description**
The `SLICE_PERIOD` constant in `Vesting` is set to 30 days. Due to the followin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: TractorFacet return the wrong values for Tractor Counter
### Description
TractorFacet will always return the wrong value for `getCounter` and `updateCounter` functions. But those can only work while running through a Blueprint call(while the activePublisher is set). This will prevent users to make external cal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `_updateMessagesValidityTimestamp()` can set a validity timestamp for a wrong `chainId`
### Description
There are no checks in `CrossChainReceiver._updateMessagesValidityTimestamp()` that a chain id is supported by the receiver. So, a validity timestamp can be set for any chain id. It makes more difficult to i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Incomplete Role Renunciation in TaikoTimelockController Deployment - Phase 2
### Description
The deployment script [`DeployOnL1`](https://github.com/taikoxyz/taiko-mono/blob/b47fc34cb0e7fe9b7ebd9416b3051a067483b860/packages/protocol/script/DeployOnL1.s.sol#L38) is used by the Taiko team to set up the contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: `TpdaLiquidationPair.swapExactAmountOut()` can be DOSed by a vault's mint limit
### Description
By repeatedly DOSing `TpdaLiquidationPair.swapExactAmountOut()` for a period of time, an attacker can swap the liquidatable balancce in a vault for profit.
### Impact
By depositing funds into a vault to reach th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Minipools can borrow from lending pool reserves that are not borrowable
### Description
In this context, unlike the borrow flow of the lending pool, we don't check whether:
- The reserve is not frozen. This check is later performed when one deposits assets into the lending pool again when calling:
```so... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: The Aave pool is hardcoded
### Description
The Aave pool is hardcoded and its not recommended by aave doc.
### Impact
Breaking of core logic and every calls to Aave pool can be revert | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Minting Fails When Width and Tick Spacing Are Both Equal to 1
### Description
When creating a `tokenId`, specifying a `width` equal to 1 and the underlying pool has a `tickSpacing` of 1, a rounding to zero occurs and the resulting lower and upper tick will be the same as the strike. This will eventually fail w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: TRST-M-4 Incorrect decoding of universalReceiver() call
### Description
**Description:**
Some contracts use the utility below to interact with the registered universal receiver
delegate.
The `universalReceiver()` function has to return a **bytes** type.
However, the wrapper above will only decode the l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [24] Protocol should be deployment ready
### Description
Across scope there are multiple instances of core files that have not been implemented that are core to the product being live, this can be seen by searching `todo` through the repo, where we have the following results:
To hint one, the security is a v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Direct theft of buyer’s ETH funds
### Description
[Exchange.sol#L168](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-non-fungible/blob/323b7cbf607425dd81da96c0777c8b12e800305d/contracts/Exchange.sol#L168)
[Exchange.sol#L565](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-non-fungible/blob/323b7cbf607425dd81da96c0777c8b12e80030... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Silent Underflow to Zero
### Description
**Update**
Acknowledged in: `2ff87d9`. The client provided the following explanation:
> The potential for the read() function in InverseApi3ReaderProxyV1.sol to return 0 due to integer division underflow is an intentional design choice. This prioritizes maximum gas eff... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Lack of safe transfer mechanism
### Description
The function `MarginAccount::withdrawERC721` facilitates the transfer of ERC721 tokens previously deposited into the protocol using `MarginAccount::provideERC721`. This function allows approved operators or the owners of the `MarginAccount`, which itself is an ER... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unreachable code.
### Description
**Description**
The following code cannot be reached:
Lines: 260, 395, 649; 300; 377; 380; 455, 539, 599; 623; 629.
_payMe(), addReward(), _renew(), _claimRewards(), _payDirect(), claimRewards(),
claimOldRewards() functions always return "true" or revert, "false" will not be ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent State Restoration in `cancelWithdrawal` Function
### Description
### Finding Description and Impact
**Root Cause**
The [cancelWithdrawal function](https://github.com/code-423n4/2025-04-kinetiq/blob/7f29c917c09341672e73be2f7917edf920ea2adb/src/StakingManager.sol# L919) in `StakingManager.sol` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Insufficient Validation Of Decryptable Balance
### Description
The vulnerability concerns the `decryptable_available_balance` field in the `process_withdraw_withheld_tokens_from_accounts` function. This field represents the balance that the authority may decrypt.
### Recommendation
Implement a check to valida... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: DOS in queue processing if async cancellations are allowed
### Description
**Description:** The `cancelRedeemRequest()` function can be used to DOS the queue processing (ie. `processUpToShares()` and `processUpToRequestID()` can be made to revert).
This is the attack path :
- `cancelRedeemRequest()` marks `s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Ownership Can Be Renounced
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `6e0ede085d8c725e95e865a67b498bd6428d1597`, `ae0fe9cf9b788b093bdb88681e476faa382cd08d`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Ownership renounced reverts now
**File(s) affected:**`AccessToken.sol`,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary modifier.
### Description
**Description**
Line 634. Validating that strategies' length is greater than 0 is unnecessary, since any
deployed vault is validated in vaultRegistry. Validation that strategies'
length is greater than 0 is performed in Controller.sol(line 207).
**Recommendation**:
Remo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: Reentrance vulnerability in `processRewards()` and `updateStakeLock()` Functions
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: PoolBase.sol
**Description**
The `processRewards()` and `updateStakeLock()` functions in the `PoolBase.sol` contract are exposed to reentrancy attacks. Thi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Typos
### Description
`owner` => `owner_`
[IERC20.sol#L129](https://github.com/maple-labs/erc20/blob/10ccf4aa0b2d6914e3c2d32e454e4d106a99a4fd/contracts/interfaces/IERC20.sol#L129)
[IERC20.sol#L132](https://github.com/maple-labs/erc20/blob/10ccf4aa0b2d6914e3c2d32e454e4d106a99a4fd/contracts/interfaces/IERC20.sol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: rageQuit() cannot transfer ERC1155 fungible tokens
### Description
Rage quitter loses his ERC1155 fungible tokens.
### Proof of Concept
`PartyGovernanceNFT` is PartyGovernance which is an `ERC1155Receiver`. But `rageQuit()` only sends ETH, with `call()`, and ERC20-tokens, with `transfer()`. ERC1155-tokens... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: A single malicious observer can exploit the infinite gas meter to grief ZetaChain blocks without proper gas compensation
### Description
ZetaChain blocks can be griefed by a single observer, possibly preventing other transactions from being processed.
### Proof of Concept
A Cosmos SDK app's ante handler v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Using `calldata` instead of `memory` for read-only arguments in `external` functions saves gas
### Description
When a function with a `memory` array is called externally, the `abi.decode()` step has to use a for-loop to copy each index of the `calldata` to the `memory` index. **Each iteration of this for-loop ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: [08] If a token that yields RSR would be used as collateral then 100% of the yield would go to StRSR
### Description
This isn’t very likely to happen (currently the only token that yields RSR is StRSR of another RToken) but it’s worth keeping an eye on it. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Multiple levels of abstraction result in the same values being repeatedly read from storage over and over again
### Description
**Description:** Multiple levels of abstraction in the codebase result in the same values being repeatedly read from storage over and over again.
For example, `SettlementBranch::_fil... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Pod: Having multiple token drops is inconsistent
### Description
The `Pod` contract had the `drop` storage field and mapping of different `TokenDrop`s `(token => TokenDrop)`. When adding a new `TokenDrop` in the mapping, the `drop` field is also changed to the added `_tokenDrop`:
**code/pods-v3-contracts/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Incorrect accounting in LockingController.applyLosses function
### Description
In the `applyLosses` function, the code attempts to distribute the negative `yield_amount` among each epoch bucket by computing:
```solidity
uint256 allocation = epochTotalReceiptToken.mulDivUp(_amount, _globalReceiptToken);
_glob... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Business Logic | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-ajna-judging/issues/105
## Found by
hyh
## Summary
User facing mergeOrRemoveCollateral() can effectively remove collateral, but lacks _revertIfAuctionClearable() check, i.e. allows to remove it while auction wasn't cleared.
## Vulnerability Detail
mergeOrRemoveCo... | Sherlock | 4 | Ajna |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Users with pre-campaign trades will drain cashback funds by claiming retroactive rewards for periods before campaign existed
### Description
The contract contains a `cashbackClaim.startTime` field that defines when the campaign begins, but this field is never validated or used in reward calculations. As a res... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Mitigate Curve LP Token Price Manipulation
### Description
## Treasury Contract Analysis
The `Treasury.sol` file calculates the `mintAmount` and `redeemAmount` by fetching the price of the LP tokens using `get_virtual_price`. This price may be manipulated temporarily with the help of read-only reentrancy. Sin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing events for critical functions
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
Critical functions like setMainChainId(), setRemoteDelegate(), and setMinRemoteCastGas() in PendleVoteManager contracts do not emit an event. The same goes for setPendleVoteManager() i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Cache compliance service and compliance configuration service for much cleaner code in `ComplianceServiceRegulated::completeTransferCheck`
### Description
`ComplianceServiceRegulated::completeTransferCheck` has a lot of `if` statements which are very large and hard to understand as they are full of `Compliance... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Code contains empty blocks
### Description
There are some empty blocks, which are unused. The code should do something or at least have a description why it is structured that way.
Other instances: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Reward share calculations do not re�lect balance changes
### Description
To withdraw ETH from a strategy, the contract calls `getPendingRewards` to calculate the amount of rewards owed to the user. This calculation is based on the current value of the user’s net deposits and the time since the user’s first de... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Governance Voting Dis-proportionally Favours Users Who Stake And Vote After A Poll Has Been Created And Had Its Snapshot Taken
### Description
Polls are created by targeting the `receive_cw20` function which is queried whenever the contract receives tokens. By setting the hook message to `Cw20HookMsg::Creat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused Code
### Description
**Update**
Fixed in: `129c7b82dfd4ec489abf686578903bd73e671457`.
The client provided the following explanation:
> _1. We intended to leave this as it is in case a new version of an adaptor is deployed that uses this function._
>
>
> _2. Fixed (removed)_
**File(s) affected:**`Aa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: msg.value == 0 checked 3 times
### Description
You can avoid checking for `msg.value == 0` multiple times by only enforcing these require conditions when `msg.value != 0`.
### Recommendation
Consider enforcing these conditions as follows:
```solidity
require(!lotteryLock, "Lottery is currently running!");
if... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Hardcoding gas costs should be avoided
### Description
**Likelihood:**
Medium, because changes to gas costs have happened before, but it is not certain that there will be changes that affect the protocol.
**Impact:**
Low, because even though calculations will be wrong they can still be done off-chain
**De... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: TRST-L-5 Strategy deployer has privileges intended only for multisig addresses.
### Description
**Description:**
When V3 Strategy is initialized, different roles are given to privileged addresses:
As the previous @audit note says, it is really important to not permit msg.sender to be
**DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE**.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: It may be possible to DoS AuctionHouse by specifying malicious creators
### Description
**Note:** *there is another bug in `AuctionHouse::_settleAuction` that causes DoS (querying `verbs.getArtPieceById` too many times), but this submission describes another issue and from now on, **I assume that `verbs.get... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Stack traces in Express are not disabled
### Description
The `NODE_ENV` environment variable is not set to production in the claim-backend component. As a result, the underlying Express web framework returns errors to the client along with a stack trace (figure 7.1), which exposes internal claim-backend paths ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: An incorrect decimal supplied to initializeSwap for a token cannot be corrected
### Description
Once a swap is initialized by the owner or an admin (indexed by the `key` parameter), the decimal precisions per token, and therefore `tokenPrecisionMultipliers`, cannot be changed. If the supplied decimals inclu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Front-Run Keeper Rewards
### Description
**Update**
Since there is no easy solution for now, the team states that they might introduce keeper consensus and dynamic changing reward system in the future to mitigate this.
The following is the original statement from the team:
> We agree that it may be easier... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Missing Zero Address Validation in Contract Setters
### Description
Several contracts within the system lack necessary validations to prevent the assignment of the zero address (0x0) in their setter functions, specifically in `setBalanceManager` and `setFeeCollector` methods. This oversight could lead to issue... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Incorrect Burn Operation in `eject()` Function
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `6daf6a0a70faef0208ca3aa3e16414d6bbee14a7`.
Recommendation implemented.
**File(s) affected:**`TokenLocker.sol`
**Description:** The function `eject()` iterates through a list of accounts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Setting `deposit.owner = address(0);` is not required
### Description
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-maia/blob/f5ba4de628836b2a29f9b5fff59499690008c463/src/BranchBridgeAgent.sol#L444
Setting `deposit.owner` to `address(0)` is not required on Line 444 since we alrea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Lack of getter function for permissions
### Description
The contract lacks a getter function to retrieve an account's permissions or specific permission details. This creates a usability barrier, especially for less sophisticated/technical users. Currently, users must have specific `SpendPermission` details to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [05] Use of deprecated `safeApprove` function in V3Migrator contract
### Description
The contract uses `safeApprove` to manage token approvals during the migration process from V2 to V3 pools. While functional, this method is deprecated due to potential issues with repeated approvals and is not recommended for... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: acceptBidForNFT() should allow accepting the bid when highestBid > bidAmount
### Description
The `acceptBidForNFT()` function is designed for sellers to accept open bids on a `BUY_IT_NOW_WITH_BIDS` listing. It takes an `expected bidAmount` as input from the seller to protect them from frontrunning attacks that... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Incorrect loop condition.
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
PROPCStakingV2.sol: redeem(), redeemAll().
The function redeem uses the loop to go through the array of all the user's stakes. Since the array is walked from the last to the first stake, the loop sooner or lat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Utilization of Improper Payer Account
### Description
## Close Expired Listing and Delist Core Functionality
In `close_expired_listing::process_close_expired_listing_core`, the `list_state` account is currently utilized as the payer for the `TransferV1CpiBuilder` CPI (Cross-Program Invocation). The `list_s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing event and or timelock for critical parameter change
### Description
Events help non-contract tools to track changes, and events prevent users from being surprised by changes.
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-gogopool/blob/aec9928d8bdce8a5a4efe45f54c39d4fc731... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `totalTokens` doesn't count native coin
### Description
Consider including native coin too.
[Test file can be found here](https://gist.github.com/T1MOH593/b6f988b6e9902d97ab8f8c07779cb28f)
Recommendation: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Hardcoded ERC20 Names
### Description
The `WrappedTokenUpgradeable` contract uses hardcoded default values `"Test"` for the `name` and `symbol` of the ERC20 token. These values are not configurable through the initializer, which can lead to unexpected or inappropriate token names during deployment.
### Recomm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Newly deployed Scribe instances can receive old data as first value
### Description
When a new instance is deployed, arbitrarily old data for the same `wat` (for example from a different chain) can be submitted and will be the oracle's value until a new one is produced and submitted. From the functionality poin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Precision Loss in `notifyRewardAmount` Function Causes Unclaimable RewardToken
### Description
In the `StakedEXA` contract, the `notifyRewardAmount` function suffers from precision loss when calculating the reward rate, leading to some rewards being locked and unclaimable.
### Impact
The precision loss in ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Calling the transferReserveToAuction will revert due to increase in currentPeriod
### Description
The auction contract calls the [transferReserveToAuction](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-12-plaza-finance/blob/14a962c52a8f4731bbe4655a2f6d0d85e144c7c2/plaza-evm/src/Pool.sol#L577) function to pull the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: `_buyoutLien()` does not properly validate the liquidationInitialAsk
### Description
Illegal liquidationInitialAsk, resulting in insufficient bids to cover the debt.
### Proof of Concept
\_buyoutLien() will validate against liquidationInitialAsk, but incorrectly uses the old stack for validation
### Rec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: The age of the pokeData is updated once accepted
### Description
When data is created offchain, an age is defined which represents the timestamp of the data creation. Once that data reaches the chain via the poke function, the age is updated to `block.timestamp`, invalidating the initial value.
This can cau... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | signature | true | true |
* If a maker makes below mentioned `AvoidsFeesContract` a [reservedAddress](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/main/contracts/core/GolomTrader.sol#L220) and hides the info about how much they want their NFT in [order.root](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/main/contracts/core/GolomTrader... | Code4rena | 5 | Golom |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Eliminate Possibility Of Underflow
### Description
## Issue with record::unwrap
In `record::unwrap`, the starting epoch of the staked SUI stored in `PendingStakeRecord` is calculated by subtracting one from `stake_activation_epoch(&staked_sui)`. When that return value is zero, an underflow may occur and cease... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Fallback Handlers Can Be Installed with Invalid Calltype
### Description
In ModuleManager contract, \_installFallbackHandler(module, initData) installs fallback handler without checking the calltype value. This fallback handler cannot be called by Nexus.
### Impact
ModuleManager's fallback function defined as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Optimization
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Unresolved
**Description**
In contract DistributionManager.sol, In the function queueFees
`if` check condition is used for zero amount check.
In this case, if the given amount is zero, queuedNative isn’t changed, but the transaction will be succe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Unbounded and invalidly bounded system parameters may cause undefined behavior
### Description
Many system parameters are unbounded or are bounded incorrectly; this increases the risk of undefined system behavior. For example, when the `BasketHandler` contract creates the target basket configuration, it does... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Hardcoded Block Time Assumptions in Beanstalk's LibDibbler
### Description
Beanstalk's LibDibbler library assumes a specific block time of 2 seconds (L2\_BLOCK\_TIME = 2) for the Layer 2 (L2) network. This assumption affects the temperature calculation in the morningTemperature function. If Beanstalk... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Attacker can front-run and pass in empty terms, making it impossible to `confirmTerms()`
### Description
In `PoolOfferHandler`, setting new terms requires two steps (`setTerms()` and `confirmTerms()`). The `setTerm()` function is `onlyOwner`, but anyone can call the `confirmTerms()` function. At the end of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [16] Using `private` rather than `public` for constants, saves gas
### Description
If needed, the value can be read from the verified contract source code. Savings are due to the compiler not having to create non-payable getter functions for deployment calldata, and not adding another entry to the method ID ta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | critical | other | false | false | ## Critical: Anyone can submit proofs via EigenPod `verifyAndProcessWithdrawals` to break the accounting of `withdrawRewards`
### Description
`CasimirManager::withdrawRewards` is an `onlyReporter` operation that performs the key tasks below:
1. Submits proofs related to the partial withdrawal of a validator at a giv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Inaccurate calculations of fee shares for DAO.
### Description
**Description**
StWSX.sol: oracle Claim Rewards().
When rewards are claimed, part of them are allocated to the DAO in the form of shares as protocol fees. However, the fees are not calculated accurately since the whole amount of the reward amount... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: [02] Chainlink's VRF V1 is deprecated
### Description
VRF V1 is [deprecated](https://docs.chain.link/docs/vrf/v1/introduction/), so new projects should not use it
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-artgobblers/blob/d2087c5a8a6a4f1b9784520e7fe75afa3a9cbdbe/src/utils/ra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Lack of zero address check
### Description
Some functions in the codebase do not include a **zero address check** for their parameters. If one of those parameters is mistakenly set to zero, it could affect the correct operation of the protocol. The affected functions are the following:
* `DataStore.setAddress... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | signature | true | false | ## Gas: `<array>.length` should not be looked up in every loop of a `for`-loop
### Description
The overheads outlined below are _PER LOOP_, excluding the first loop
* storage arrays incur a Gwarmaccess (**100 gas**)
* memory arrays use `MLOAD` (**3 gas**)
* calldata arrays use `CALLDATALOAD` (**3 gas**)
Caching the l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Install OpenZeppelin via npm
### Description
Code from `SafeMath`, `Ownable`, `ERC20Basic`, `ERC20`, `BasicToken`, and `StandardToken` was copied from OpenZeppelin into the files [SafeMath](https://github.com/unikoingold/UnikoinGold-UKG-Contract/blob/8b38f30039c2d13383c416fd6143f6bd0f091404/contracts/SafeMath.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: User can always inflate the `totalSellReserveAmount` variable to block the auction from being ended
### Description
User can always inflate the [`totalSellReserveAmount`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-12-plaza-finance/blob/main/plaza-evm/src/Auction.sol#L151) variable to block the auction from bein... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Multiple compiler versions allowing a wide range from 0.5.0 to >=0.8.0
### Description
## Handle
0xRajeev
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Project uses multiple compiler versions with most specifying ^0.8.0, some specifying >=0.8.0 which allows breaking versions >= 0.9.0 in future if reused/redeployed, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | oracle | true | false | ## Gas: Internal/Private functions only called once can be inlined to save gas
### Description
Not inlining costs 20 to 40 gas because of two extra JUMP instructions and additional stack operations needed for function calls.
Affected code:
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-ondo/blob/f3426e5b6b4561e09460b2e6471eb... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Missing Type Check While Placing Order
### Description
## Order Type Verification Issue
In the functions `market::place_market_order` and `market::place_limit_order()`, when placing an order, there is no type verification against the original market types. Usually, the market should only allow orders of the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Duplicated validation can be moved to shared internal function
### Description
Currently, both `RiskOracle::publishRiskParameterUpdate` and `RiskOracle::publishBulkRiskParameterUpdates` contain essentially the same validation:
```solidity
// `RiskOracle::publishRiskParameterUpdate`:
require(validUpdateTypes... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: ForceWithdraw Can Be Blocked
### Description
Force withdraw can be blocked since `CashAsset::forceWithdraw()` will withdraw the cash balance to the owner address.
If a user controls an address which was blacklisted by USDC, then they can prevent being force withdrawn by transferring their sub account NFT to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Emergency Pause Mechanism for RequestOracle
### Description
The `RequestOracle` contract lacks an emergency pause mechanism for user-triggered function `request`:
- Limited administrative control during unexpected scenarios
Key considerations:
- Providing administrators with rapid incident response capabiliti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Business Logic | true | true | **Description:** There is an issue in the integration with the GMX V2 trading platform, specifically in the [`GMX_Module::gmxv2_update`](https://github.com/d2sd2s/d2-contracts/blob/c2fc257605ebc725525028a5c17f30c74202010b/contracts/modules/GMXV2.sol#L140-L148) function:
```solidity
function gmxv2_update(
bytes32 ke... | Cyfrin | 5 | D |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Unlimited Token Address Overwrites by Admin
### Description
In the `L2WrappedBaseTokenStore` contract, the `admin` can overwrite the `l2WBaseTokenAddress` mapping for any `chainId` an unlimited number of times. This lack of restrictions on address overwrites allows the `admin` to change L2 token addresses a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: Non-zero operator.limit should always be greater than or equal to operator.funded
### Description
For the subtraction operation in `OperatorsRegistry.1.sol#L428-L430` to not underflow and revert, there should be an assumption that
```
operators[selectedOperatorIndex].limit >= operators[selectedOperatorIndex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: NGINX Server Configurations Should Be Improved
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `c5c323a`. The client provided the following explanation: Have added all recommended changes to nginx.config, was split across multiple commits so just look at latest
**Description:** There... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | access-control | true | false | ## Gas: [G‑16] Functions guaranteed to revert when called by normal users can be marked `payable`
### Description
If a function modifier such as `onlyOwner` is used, the function will revert if a normal user tries to pay the function. Marking the function as `payable` will lower the gas cost for legitimate callers bec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Losses of some long traders can eat into the margins of others
### Description
The losses of some long traders can eat into the margins of others, resulting in those affected long traders being unable to withdraw their margin and profits, leading to a loss of assets for the long traders.
### Impact
Loss of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `s_defaultClientBasisPoints` should be restricted
### Description
`s_defaultClientBasisPoints` should be less than 10_000 https://github.com/p2p-org/eth-staking-fee-distributor-contracts/blob/30a7ff78e8285f2eae4ae552efb390aa4453a083/contracts/feeDistributorFactory/FeeDistributorFactory.sol#L52 https://githu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Do not calculate constants
### Description
Due to how constant variables are implemented (replacements at compile-time), an expression assigned to a constant variable is recomputed each time that the variable is used, which wastes some gas.
*Instances include:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [01] No point in using regular http request over `batchhttperequest`
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-phala-network/blob/a01ffbe992560d8d0f17deadfb9b9a2bed38377e/phala-blockchain/crates/pink/runtime/src/capi/ecall_impl.rs#L299-L300
Since the len in `batchhttprequest` is not restricted to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: BoringOwnable is Unused
### Description
Both contracts `FuroStream` and `FuroVesting` are inheriting from the contract `BoringOwnable`. However, neither of the contracts use any of the modifiers, functions or variables from `BoringOwnable`.
In the case of `FuroVesting`, which uses the term "owner" to refer t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Move `require` check to top of function
### Description
The `require` check in `PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory#addPool` comes after several state changes. Consider moving it to the top of the function to follow the checks-effects-interactions pattern.
[`PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory.sol#L112`](https://github... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of input validation
### Description
The [`OptimisticGovernor`](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/fca8e24275e928f7ddf660b5651eb93b87f70afb/packages/core/contracts/zodiac/OptimisticGovernor.sol) contract has a general lack of input validation. For instance, the [`setUp`](https://github.com/UMA... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.