prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: RubiconRouter.swapEntireBalance() doesn’t handle the slippage check properly
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-rubicon/blob/main/contracts/RubiconRouter.sol#L267_L287
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The `swapEntireBalance()` function allows the user to pass a `buy_a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Sensitive Data Exposure Via Logs And Events
### Description
## User-Sensitive Information in Logs
In some places, the app logs and emits events with user-sensitive information. Logging levels must be set appropriately before the product ships so that sensitive user data cannot mistakenly be exposed to pote... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: minimumPull Vault parameter cannot be adjusted
### Description
`minimumPull` is hardcoded to be `10^6` in Vault and can't be reset thereafter.
If vault token has low decimals and high enough value, for example WBTC having 8 decimals (https://etherscan.io/token/0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599#cod... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Owner of the Modular Account in `ResourceLockValidator` Cannot Be Smart Contract Wallet
### Description
When recovering the signature of the `walletOwner`. We use the ECDSA method for recovery. This prevents modular wallets from setting the owner to a smart contract wallet that uses `eip-1271`.
[ResourceLockV... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Can access cards of other markets
### Description
_Submitted by [gpersoon](https://twitter.com/gpersoon)_
Within `RCMarket.sol` the functions `ownerOf` and `onlyTokenOwner` do not check if the `_cardId/_token` is smaller than `numberOfCards`. So it's possible to supply a larger number and access cards of oth... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Rent-Exempt Calculated On Theoretical Data Size
### Description
## Rent-Exempt Calculations in Stake Program
Ensure rent-exempt calculations are performed on actual data size instead of theoretical data size. For example, in `AddValidatorToPool`, the rent-exempt calculation on the `reserve_pool` is performed ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: User can lose all funds when creating or increasing compounded Maker position due to share inflation first deposit attack in any segment of the user's range
### Description
Each segment in the Ammplify protocol functions as vault for compounded Makers. This makes the classic first deposit share inflation atta... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Sybil Attack | false | false | ## Security Report
## Severity
**High Risk**
## Context
*File:* BridgeFacet.sol
*Lines:* 652-688
## Description
When funds are bridged from source to destination chain, messages must first go through optimistic verification before being executed on the destination BridgeFacet.sol contract. Upon transfer processing... | Spearbit | 5 | Connext |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: `EmptyFeedPrice` will cause orders to be canceled
### Description
In most cases where orders are submitted using invalid oracle prices, the check for [`isEmptyPriceError()`](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-gmx/blob/main/gmx-synthetics/contracts/oracle/OracleUtils.sol#L292-L310) returns true, and t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Lack of guardian-role transfer
### Description
The [guardian address from the `GovernorAlpha` contract](https://github.com/notional-finance/contracts-v2/blob/c37c89c9729b830637558a09b6f22fc6a735da64/contracts/external/governance/GovernorAlpha.sol#L36) has a special role inside the system.
However, if the add... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: `BondingTax` has invalid slippage implementation
### Description
In BondingTax.sol, `swapForAsset` will swap `taxTokens` to `assetToken` through uniswap router.
The issue is that the slippage calculation (`minOutput`) is invalid. Currently, `mintOutput` is a percentage that is based on `router.getAmountsOu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Imprecise Naming of closeCurrentFeePeriod() Variables
### Description
The `closeCurrentFeePeriod` function uses two variables, `secondLastFeePeriod` and `lastFeePeriod`. The naming of these variables is not specific enough and can lead to confusion, especially when `FEE_PERIOD_LENGTH` is 2. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Function parameter never used
### Description
**Description**
File: TransferFragmented Funds.svelte
Function: migrate Funds
Details:
The function has a parameter declared as "isRerun?: boolean", however, it is never used in the function code. Looking for the function calls we can differentiate the two types o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: The maximum number of 50000 vaults invariant can be bypassed and lead to DOS
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
There is an invariant in the business logic which sets the maximum number of available vaults to 50000. This invariant is checked in the `addVaults` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: NFT safe transfers will revert using `ERC721TransferEnforcer`
### Description
**Description:** The `ERC721TransferEnforcer` enforcer is designed to authorize NFT token transfers, but it currently restricts transfers to only use the `transferFrom` selector. The issue lies in this code section:
The ERC721 stan... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Owner can incorrectly pull funds from contests not yet expired
### Description
Owner can incorrectly pull funds from a closed contest which has not yet expired using `distributeByOwner()`.
### Impact
- **Loss of funds** as it can be drained by the owner by mistake from a not-yet-expired contest.
- **Funds/Rew... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: One can attempt to steal a pair's ETH
### Description
Anyone can pass the enrolled pair's address instead of a splitter address in `bulkWithdrawFees()` to effectively call the pair's `withdrawAllETH()` instead of a splitter's `withdrawAllETH()`. This allows anyone to attempt to steal/drain all the ETH from ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Event Emitted with Zero Token Ids
### Description
**Update**
The issue was fixed by adding an if statement such that an event is not emitted when no tokens are locked or unlocked.
**File(s) affected:**`ElderGateway.sol`
**Description:** The `lock` and `unlock` methods emit the `Locked` and `Unlocked` events ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unexpected Behaviour If RPL Inflation Rate Set to Zero
### Description
The protocol DAO can configure the RPL inflation rate (which is initially set to the equivalent of 5% p.a. calculated daily). Should the inflation rate be set to zero for a period then back to some non-zero value, the behaviour of the minti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: RubiconMarketAddress in BathPair can’t be updated
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-rubicon/blob/main/contracts/rubiconPools/BathPair.sol#L128
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-rubicon/blob/main/contracts/rubiconPools/BathHouse.sol#L335-L337
## Vulnerability detai... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Transfer of 0 funds
### Description
If `withdrawFee == 0`, then here 0 amount of asset transferred:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/pool/PoolService.sol#L191
### Recommendation
We recommend adding a check, so 0 funds wouldn't be ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Remove unused function `USDCBridgeV2::_redeemUSDC`
### Description
The `private` function `USDCBridgeV2::_redeemUSDC` is not used anywhere; remove it. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Old owner can frontrun the ownerChanger
### Description
The [`Ownable` contract](https://github.com/holdefi/Holdefi/blob/f4df394d7cf6df347b1f1e9af8e2676c5933c2c9/contracts/Ownable.sol) is a modified version of [the OpenZepplin `Ownable` contract](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/5... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | oracle | true | false | ## Gas: `require()` or `revert()` statements that check input arguments should be at the top of the function
### Description
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables
1. File: contracts/ChainlinkPriceOracle.sol (line [62](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-phuture/blob/5... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary Allowance Buildup in the `UniswapNFTManager`
### Description
In `UniswapNFTManager.sol`, `callback()` approves Uniswap NFT to spend amount to burn + 1 by only sending amount to burn as amount desired in the Uniswap NFT increase liquidity calls. This could lead to significant consequences.
### Impa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | true | false | ## Low: [05] Overpaid asset is locked in lending pool when flashloan
### Description
*Note: At the judge’s request [here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-01-init-capital-invitational-findings/issues/7#issuecomment-1934027323), this downgraded issue from the same warden has been included in this report for completen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: A Buyer May Be Able to Make Free Payments
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `27c78f19475de50475788fc87585c0ddecc892a5`. The client provided the following explanation: Add Accepting Payments As A Contract Section to the Readme. This finding has been addressed via document... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Documentation Mentions Blacklisting Functionality that Is Not Present in Code
### Description
**Update**
The team stated that the comment regarding the blacklisting functionality was an artifact from a previous iteration of the protocol and removed the wrong parts of the function documentation. Addressed in: `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Potential Owner/Operator Backdoor in ERC721z Tokens
### Description
Token owners or operators can approve themselves to a particular token ID.
### Impact
If the `isApprovedForAll()` status of the user is removed, his self-approval to the `tokenId` via `approve()` still stands, providing a potential approval b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Incorrect implementation of access control in MIMOProxy:execute
### Description
There is a function `execute` in `MIMOProxy` smart contract. The function performs a delegate call to the user-specified address with the specified data. As an access control, the function checks that either it was called by the o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: SwapGuardV2 has multiple problems
### Description
1. Contracts that use SwapGuardV2 together with Facade+Executor are out of scope
2. All functions are public and anyone can makeCheckpoint()
3. This contract will not work with native ETH.
4. allowedLoss adds up with tokens having different decimals. Or tokensP... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inefficient Commission Accounting for Administrator and Market Maker
### Description
The [`transferCommissions`](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/09b6188e028650b9c1758010846080c5f8c80f8e/src/OnchainLOB.sol#L582) function updates commissions by modifying the `Trader` struct for both the adm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Replay attack in case of hard fork
### Description
[GolomTrader.sol#L98](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/7bbb55fca61e6bae29e57133c1e45806cbb17aa4/contracts/core/GolomTrader.sol#L98)
If there is ever a hardfork for Golom then `EIP712_DOMAIN_TYPEHASH` value will become invalid. This is becau... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Users can delete all validators from `Nexus` account
### Description
In the Nexus smart account system, validators are essential for authorizing transactions through the `validateUserOp` function. The `_uninstallValidator` function allows users to remove validators from their account. If a user removes all ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | true | false | ## High: MISMATCHING DATA LOCATION DURING INHERITANCE
### Description
It was identified that the `dPrimeConnectorHyperlane` contract was incompatible with the latest `Hyperlane` protocol and might not work with new versions of `Hyperlane Inbox` contracts, which can lead to users losing their `dPrime` tokens during cro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Withdraw Priority Updates Lack Validation of Allocation Keys
### Description
The `StrategyManager.setWithdrawPriority()` function updates the withdrawal queue without validating that the provided keys correspond to existing allocations. Although the function is restricted to the manager, the absence of on-chai... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Function Selectors On Deprecated Functions Are Not Locked
### Description
[Pull request 1031](https://github.com/across-protocol/contracts/pull/1031/commits/e05964b074e6906e4dcb1d0fcd333dc7eb0b87be) removes already announced deprecated functionalities, such as the `depositDeprecated_5947912356` and `depositFor... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: No deadline for user signatures
### Description
**Description:** Signatures signed by users should always have an [expiration or timestamp deadline](https://dacian.me/signature-replay-attacks#heading-no-expiration), such that after that time the signature is no longer valid.
When users sign a transaction they... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `maxWithdraw()` return values exceed actual withdrawable amounts due to fee exclusion
### Description
_Resolved_
The `YuzuIssuer.maxWithdraw()` returns the maximum amount of assets that can be withdrawn by a user without considering withdrawal fees.
When a user attempts to withdraw assets:
1. User has 100 s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use `""` instead of `new bytes(0)`
### Description
**Files:** `StateTransitionManager.sol`, `Mailbox.sol`
[File: code/contracts/ethereum/contracts/state-transition/chain-deps/facets/Mailbox.sol](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-zksync/blob/main/code/contracts/ethereum/contracts/state-transition/chain-dep... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Merkle-tree-related contracts vulnerable to cross-chain-replay attacks
### Description
_Submitted by IllIllI_
> Bank is a token vesting, airdrop and payroll tool. It uses merkle trees to massively scale token distributions with integrated vesting (time locks). The idea of this tool is that it allows DAOs t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | signature | false | false | ## Gas: Caching the domainSeparator will optimise gas
### Description
The current implementation of `Signature::getDomainSeparator` recomputes the domain separator on each method call. It is a smart optimization to cache the value of the domain separator as it should never change unless the `chain.id` changes, which s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Potential Malfunction in Admin-Controlled Functions
### Description
**Update**
The client Acknowledged this issue.
**File(s) affected:**`Sleeves.sol`
**Description:** For `Sleeves.adminUnsleeveBatch()` and `adminWithdrawWithProofBatch()` to execute successfully, the user must have previously approved `PDT` t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [G‑06] `internal` functions only called once can be inlined to save gas
### Description
Not inlining costs **20 to 40 gas** because of two extra `JUMP` instructions and additional stack operations needed for function calls.
*There are 2 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Unused `flashGovernor` variable
### Description
The [`PoolFactory.flashGovernor`](https://github.com/clearpool-finance/permissionless-protocol/blob/f1f38c5ba83e2c3a68155042229b04678d9425ce/contracts/PoolFactory.sol#L26) variable is not being used in the code and is always zero.
### Recommendation
Remove the u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Transfer intents cannot be invalidated
### Description
Operators earn fees by being facilitators of trades between payers and merchants. Protocol operators are a permissionless role, and Coinbase is one of these. Transfer intents are signed by payers, and when processed, the `processedTransferIntents` is se... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Business Logic | true | true | ## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/main/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantPoolBase.sol#L57-L60
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/main/contracts/liquid-staking/GiantMevAndFeesPool.sol#L176-L178
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/main/contracts/liqui... | Code4rena | 5 | Stakehouse Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: OUTDATED VERSIONS OF TLS SUPPORTED
### Description
Several misconfigurations were identified within the application's TLS configuration that could compromise the security of communications.
Scoped URLs in the application have been identified to support the deprecated and vulnerable versions of TLS: v1.0 an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Upgrade openzeppelin/contracts 's version
### Description
There are known vulnerabilities in the current `@openzeppelin/contracts` version used. This affects SeaDrop.sol with a potential Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability as `ECDSA.recover` is used.
### Recommendation
Consider upgr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [03] Wrong event emitted in `removeStrategy`
### Description
### Finding description and impact
The `RemoveStrategy` event is emitted with an incorrect strategy address.
### Proof of Concept
When removing a strategy in MultiStrategy, the last strategy in the array is moved to the position of the strategy be... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: User’s stakes after admin’s removed can not be refunded again
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Resolved
If users continue staking after admin has executed `refundFromAdminInETH()` or `refundFromAdminInUSDT()` in `treasury.sol` then the funds will not be able to get refunded again. These funct... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: A missing zero address check
### Description
There is an issue in the following functions - https://github.com/p2p-org/eth-staking-fee-distributor-contracts/blob/30a7ff78e8285f2eae4ae552efb390aa4453a083/contracts/feeDistributor/ContractWcFeeDistributor.sol#L181, https://github.com/p2p-org/eth-staking-fee-distr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent usage of seed constants and byte literals
### Description
_Resolved_
When checking the `fund_pool` address, the seeds used are inconsistent. Some places use the constant `FUND_POOL_SEED`, while others directly use the literal `b"fund_pool"`.
Although both are currently equivalent, accidental mo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Improper Snapshotter Address Handling when Disabling Nodes
### Description
**File(s) affected:**`SnapshotterState.sol`
**Description:** When a node is burned, a call to `_disableNode()` is made. The function removes the snapshotter address of the node from the `allSnapshotters` mapping without checking if `sn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Consider Using Named Mappings
### Description
The project accepts using a Solidity compiler version greater than `0.8.18`, which supports named mappings. Using named mappings can improve the readability and maintainability of the code by making the purpose of each mapping clearer. This practice helps developer... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Privileged Roles and Ownership
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> This is a design behavior. It will need to be deepened on the documentation.
**File(s) affected:**`FanToArtistStaking.sol`, `Web3MusicNativeToken.sol`, `Web3MusicNativeTokenDA... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: integer overflow in slice()
### Description
There is an integer overflow in the slice() code, which will cause memory corruption.
### Impact
Medium Risk | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: MessageQueue Stores Incorrect Value if not Initialized Before Appending
### Description
In `L2MessageQueue` it is expected that `initialize` is called before `appendMessage`. This initializes the [`zeroHashes` array](https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/blob/3bc8a3f5c6ac816ddffadca41024331dcf4d3064/contrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | true | false | ## Low: Missing Validation Logic
### Description
## Asset Validation and Flashloan Issues in Metastable Pool
## Issues Identified
### 1. Absence of Validation for Asset Decimals
There is an absence of validation for asset decimals when creating a metastable pool in `pool::validate_assets_metadata`. Currently, the fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Missing Zero-Address Validation for Token Admin Risks Permanent Loss of Role Management
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `8f5288a5d2eceec7c856b965e040361c91a25d2e`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Fixed
**File(s) affected:**`src/Token.sol`
**Descript... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Centralization risk
### Description
Currently, the `operator` account is the **only signer** of critical batch deposit and withdraw operations, handling significant amount of tokens multiple tokens, such as `USDC`, `TBill` and `sUSD (Solayer USD)`.
It is not mentioned in the documentation that it is a require... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | true | ## High: Incorrect reward distribution when t == roundedtimestamp in feedistributor.sol contract
### Description
The `FeeDistributor` contract has a vulnerability that leads to incorrect reward distribution when a transaction occurs at the beginning of an epoch. The issue is related to the `_checkpointTotalSupply` fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Multiple tokens could be minted by the same msg.sender
### Description
The `StoryBadgeNFT` contract allows users to mint a badge NFT by providing a valid signature. The current implementation uses the `usedSignatures` mapping to track which signatures have been used, ensuring that each `msg.sender` can mint o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: | Inaccurate Comment
### Description
**Description**
In the `completeConversion` and `completeConversionToMpKey` functions it is stated that `the sender's vesting tokens must be non-zero` however the sender’s vesting tokens must be zero or else the `acceptTransfer` on the `RewardRouter` will revert.
**Recomm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Front-running certain validator operations leads to honest edges not being tracked
### Description
Front-running the validator when a bisection or a new sub-challenge operation is being performed prevents the newly created honest edge(s) from being tracked. The validator is responsible for keeping track of al... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Loop can use unchecked arithmetic and cache array length
### Description
The `Network::scheduleBatch()` function has multiple loops that can be optimized with unchecked arithmetic and cached array lengths.
### Recommendation
```solidity
function scheduleBatch(/*...*/) public virtual override onlyRole(PROPOSER... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | access-control | false | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-hats-judging/issues/116
## Found by
unforgiven
## Summary
in normal scenario middle level admins can't relink a child tree to another tree and when code link a tree it checks that the old and new admin is in the same tree(have same tippy hat). but middle level admin... | Sherlock | 4 | Hats |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Code Refactoring
### Description
## Refactor Summary
## Changes Made
1. **Modify `force_transfer_amount`**
- The `ForceTransferred` event is now only emitted once, preventing duplicate emissions from the internal call to `force_transfer` and in `force_transfer_amount`.
2. **Update `add_holder_address_int... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Mismatching variable naming for `Metadata.depositBlock`
### Description
**Description:** Based on [the inline doc ](https://github.com/USD-Pi-Protocol/contract/blob/main/contracts/lib/STBL_Structs.sol#L26-L27)of `Metadata.depositBlock` implies it saves the block number when the deposit was created, but in real... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Seizing assets as collateral without entering the market may result in incorrect value calculation
### Description
During liquidation, collateral may be seized even if the borrower has not entered the market with it. Sanity checks regarding the price oracle status for the seized asset will be skipped if the m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Direct usage of ecrecover allows signature malleability
### Description
Multiple functions across the protocol codebase make use of the Ethereum-specfic `ecrecover` function directly to verify the given signatures. However, using `ecrecover` directly allows malleable (non-unique) signatures and thus is suscept... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Division before multiple can lead to precision errors
### Description
Because Solidity integer division may truncate, it is often preferable to do multiplication before division to prevent precision loss.
**Affected source code:**
- [FraxlendPairCore.sol#L315](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-frax/blob/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unlimited Registrations with Same Referral Code
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
In the referral.sol The current implementation allows unlimited registrations using the same referral code, which can be exploited by creating multiple accounts to earn referral rewards ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Referral discount is not applied when `fees_prepayment` is zero in `PerpEngine::fill`
### Description
**Description:** In `PerpEngine::fill`, when `fees_prepayment` is zero we do not apply the referral discount even though we still send `ref_payment` to `ref_address`.
`self.fee_rate` is equal to `perp_fee... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Front-Running | false | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-buffer-judging/issues/82
## Found by
\_\_141345\_\_, 0x52
## Summary
When an option is created, enough collateral is locked in BufferBinaryPool to cover a payout should it close ITM. As long as an LP isn't locked (trivially 10 minutes) and there is sufficient liqui... | Sherlock | 5 | Buffer Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Exposure to Reentrance
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
SubnetActorManagerFacet.sol - Function `unstake()` is exposed to reentrancy as well as cross-function reentrancy. The reentrancy is can be triggered when the execution reaches `LibStaking.withdrawWithConf... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Code Refactoring
### Description
## Code Review Recommendations
1. **Utilization of `ordered_map::reverse`**
Make use of `ordered_map::reverse` for both the asks and bids maps in `place_limit_order` within `Orderbook` so that the order of elements in the map is reversed, providing a correctly sorted list ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Events In Initialize Functions
### Description
None of the initialize functions emit emit init-specific events. They all however have the initializer modifier (from Initializable) so that they can be called only once. Off-chain monitoring of calls to these critical functions is not possible.
### Recom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Not proper variable naming
### Description
**Severity:** Informational
**Description:** The contract `FeeData` has a internal variable `_feeValue` that is used to calculate the fee.
Across the usage of this variable, it is used as a numerator while calculating the fee percentage.
We recommend renaming this va... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: CTokenOracle.sol#getCErc20Price contains critical math error
### Description
CTokenOracle.sol#getCErc20Price contains a math error that immensely overvalues CTokens
### Impact
All lenders could be drained of all their funds due to excessive over valuation of CTokens cause by this error
### Recommendation
Fi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: Precision loss in the invariant function can lead to loss of funds
### Description
[src/core/Pair.sol#L56](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-numoen/blob/2ad9a73d793ea23a25a381faadc86ae0c8cb5913/src/core/Pair.sol#L56)
An attacker can steal the funds without affecting the invariant.
### Proof of Concept
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Burn and bridge mechanism can be delayed due to paused token bridge state
### Description
**Description:** Contract RollupRevenueVault provides the BURNER_ROLE with the burnAndBridge() function. In this process, Linea tokens are meant to be bridged to L1 and burned there.
For bridging, the `tokenBridge` servi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | true | ## Medium: Allocate and remove are not exact inverses of each other
### Description
Due to the rounding logic used in the codebase, when users allocate funds into a system, they may not receive the same amount back when they remove them.
When funds are allocated into a system, the values are rounded down (through na... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Holographable tokens can be reinitialized
### Description
When new holographable tokens are created, they typically set a state variable that holds the address of the holograph contract. When creation is done through the `HolographFactory`, the holograph contract is [passed in as a parameter](https://github... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Accounting available flow as available liquidity will lead to underestimate utilization
### Description
When computing available liquidity for minipools, available flow from main lending pool is counted as available liquidity.
### Recommendation
Please consider removing available flow from the available li... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Validation of the `frozen` and `revision_height` Values in `try_from()` for `ClientState`
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `fc06501f1ec94f44d2b482894a1fb86aeb85c5f2`.
The appropriate values are now validated in `create_client()`.
**File(s) affected:**`light-cl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Certain function can be blocked if the ERC20 token revert in 0 amount transfer after `PublicVault#transferWithdrawReserve` is called
### Description
The function transferWithdrawReserve in Public Vault has no access control.
If this function is called, the token balance is transfered to withdrawProxy
an... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Stack variable used as a cheaper cache for a state variable is only used once
### Description
If the variable is only accessed once, it's cheaper to use the state variable directly that one time
*There is 1 instance of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Multiple accesses of a mapping/array should use a local variable cache
### Description
The instances below point to the second+ access of a value inside a mapping/array, within a function. Caching a mapping's value in a local `storage` or `calldata` variable when the value is accessed [multiple times](https://... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | timing | true | false | ## Low: Assembly blocks could benefit from `"memory-safe"` annotation
### Description
When hashing request data in [`Spin::_hashParticipation`](https://github.com/Consensys/linea-hub/blob/295344925ec4321265f7cbac174fcf903b529a4e/contracts/src/Spin.sol#L383-L409) and [`Spin::_hashClaim`](https://github.com/Consensys/li... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Loop Condition.
### Description
**Severity**: Critical
**Status**: Resolved
**description**
1. PROPCStakingV2.sol: redeem().
The function contains a critical flaw in its loop construct that results in the function not accounting for the very first staking position (stake ID 0) when calculating t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: JSON-RPC Memory Amplification Vulnerability
### Description
The JSON-RPC server processes and parses JSON requests before applying rate limiting controls, creating potential for memory exhaustion attacks within configured payload limits. JSON payloads can be manipulated to be much larger in memory due to the u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: Rounding Errors Result In Lost Accrued Rewards
### Description
## Staking Pool Withdrawal Issue
In `staking_pool.move`, `request_withdraw_stake` is responsible for withdrawing staked tokens and accrued rewards from a staking pool. However, the function utilizes `get_token_amount` to calculate the number of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Business Logic | true | true | _Submitted by xiaoming90, also found by shenwilly, unforgiven, and WatchPug_
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-rubicon/blob/8c312a63a91193c6a192a9aab44ff980fbfd7741/contracts/rubiconPools/BathPair.sol#L213>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-rubicon/blob/8c312a63a91193c6a192a9aab44ff980fbfd7741/contracts/rub... | Code4rena | 5 | Rubicon |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Usage of uints/ints smaller than 32 bytes (256 bits) incurs overhead
### Description
When using elements that are smaller than 32 bytes, your contract’s gas usage may be higher. This is because the EVM operates on 32 bytes at a time. Therefore, if the element is smaller than that, the EVM must use more operati... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Anyone can cancel traders' market orders due to missing access control in `OrderBranch::cancelMarketOrder`
### Description
Anyone can cancel traders' market orders due to missing access control in `OrderBranch::cancelMarketOrder`:
```solidity
function cancelMarketOrder(uint128 tradingAccountId) external {
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Unpredictable behavior for users due to admin front running or general bad timing
### Description
In a number of cases, administrators of contracts can update or upgrade things in the system without warning. This has the potential to violate a security goal of the system.
Specifically, privileged roles coul... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: [01] Set treasury missing check `address(0)`
### Description
The code should validate _treasury address is not address(0) when setting Treasury in [lending pool](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-01-init-capital-invitational/blob/a01c4de620be98f9e57a60cf6a82d4feaec54f58/contracts/lending_pool/LendingPool.sol#... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Hard-coding 0 max fee with fast finality is incompatible as this combination commonly has minimum fees of 1
### Description
Circle's [CCTPv2 Technical Guide](https://developers.circle.com/cctp/technical-guide) provides the following relevant information:
* Messages with `minFinalityThreshold` of 1000 or low... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Use Of slot0 To Get `sqrtPriceX96` Can Lead To Price Manipulation
### Description
**Severity** - Low
**Status** - Resolved
**Description**
Inside OracleLibrary the price (`sqrtPriceX96`) from UniswapV3 AMM is pulled from slot0, which is the most recent data point and can be manipulated easily via MEV bots a... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.