prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Returned values of low-level external calls are ignored
### Description
The `MintUtil.safeMint` and `BatchBlacklister.blacklistAddresses` functions utilize the `Address.functionCall` helper function, which returns byte values from low-level function calls. Currently, these returned values are completely ignore... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Founders can receive less tokens that expected
### Description
[Token.sol#L118](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-nouns-builder/blob/7e9fddbbacdd7d7812e912a369cfd862ee67dc03/src/token/Token.sol#L118)
Because the IDs of the founders tokens are wrongly computed, some of them can have an id higher than 10... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Intrinsic arbitrage from price discrepancy
### Description
The up to 2 % price discrepancy from Chainlink creates an intrinsic arbitrage. Especially, it makes withdrawals worth more than deposits in the sense that one can immediately withdraw more than just deposited.
### Proof of Concept
When [depositing E... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Vested rewards lost if users alter liquidity mid-incentive
### Description
_Acknowledged_
When users stake their UniV3 positions in the `UniswapV3Staker` contract to earn some rewards, the owner creates incentives with a certain tick range and a vesting period, where the pool's price needs to stay in the rang... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Stablepools return wrong price when they do not converge
### Description
[/contracts/pool-manager/src/helpers.rs# L751](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-mantra-dex/blob/26714ea59dab7ecfafca9db1138d60adcf513588/contracts/pool-manager/src/helpers.rs# L751)
### Finding description and impact
A StableSwa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Some actions are allowed on partyB when corresponding partyA is liquidated allowing to steal all protocol funds
### Description
`deallocateForPartyB` function doesn't check if partyA is liquidated, allowing partyB to deallocate funds when partyA liquidation process is not finished:
https://github.com/sherl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | other | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-union-judging/issues/25
## Found by
hyh
## Summary
Time difference accounted for in _getEffectiveAmounts() that is used for rewards computation is based on the lesser amount of time passed since last reward withdrawal and borrower's last repay. In order to maximize... | Sherlock | 5 | Union Finance Update |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Lack of updating the auctionLength parameter in the giveLoan() and buyLoan()
### Description
The `Lender::giveLoan()` and `Lender::buyLoan()` lack updating the loan's `auctionLength` parameter to match the new pool. Either a borrower or a lender can lose their benefits.
### Impact
In the case of `giveLoan()`,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Avoid Redundant State Checks In Init Functions
### Description
## Removing Redundant State Checks in #[init] Macro
The `#[init]` macro includes an implicit check for `env::state_exists()` to be false, as demonstrated in the provided code snippet below. Repeating the check in the function body unnecessarily us... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Disabled Adapters Should Stay Disabled
### Description
## Security Assessment Report
## Severity
**Medium Risk**
## Context
**Location:** Divider.sol#L107-109
## Situation
Anyone can enable an adapter again as soon as someone has disabled the adapter (in `whenPermissionless`). This circumvents the reaso... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Account Validation
### Description
## Fees Helper Initialization Issue
In `fees_helper::initialize`, the `res_account` account address is not checked to ensure that it equals `@liquidswap_v1_resource_account`. This may result in the `res_account` variable containing a different account address than what was i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: `_transferNFTs()` succeeds even if no transfer is performed
### Description
_Submitted by k, also found by 0x29A, 0xf15ers, 0xsanson, antonttc, hyh, PwnedNoMore, and zzzitron_
If an NFT is sold that does not specify support for the ERC-721 or ERC-1155 standard interface, the sale will still succeed. In doing... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: RocketMinipool - Inconsistent access control modifier declaration onlyMinipoolOwner Acknowledged
### Description
The access control modifier `onlyMinipoolOwner` should be renamed to `onlyMinipoolOwnerOrWithdrawalAddress` to be consistent with the actual check permitting the owner or the withdrawal address to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Missing Natspec, Typo, Incorrect Comments
### Description
Instances of incomplete NatSpec documentation, unnecessary casting, and incorrect comments have been identified in the codebase.
### Recommendation
- In the `index()` function, consider replacing the require statements with revert statements, as custom... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Malicious Pool Factory can be used to prevent new pools from being voted on as well as brick voting locks
### Description
Because `gauges[_pool]` can only be set once in the voter, governance has the ability to introduce a malicious factory that will revert on command as a way to prevent normal protocol functi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: `ConvexStakingWrapper.sol#_calcRewardIntegral` Wrong implementation can disrupt rewards calculation and distribution
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug, also found by cmichel, harleythedog, hickuphh3, kirk-baird, and leastwood_
[ConvexStakingWrapper.sol#L175-L204](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: `AccessControlHooks` `onQueueWithdrawal()` does not check if market is hooked which could lead to unexpected errors such as temporary DoS
### Description
### Impact
The `onQueueWithdrawal()` function does not check if the caller is a hooked market, meaning anyone can call the function and attempt to verify... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Creators can steal sale revenue from owners' sales
### Description
_Submitted by IllIllI_
[NFTMarketCreators.sol#L158-L160](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-foundation/blob/a03a7e198c1dfffb1021c0e8ec91ba4194b8aa12/contracts/mixins/NFTMarketCreators.sol#L158-L160)
[NFTMarketCreators.sol#L196-L198](https:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Redundant calls to `vaultExists` modifier with the same `_vaultId`
### Description
There are two identical calls to the same modifier with the same arguments, which is redundant. Remove one of them ([see here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-04-gondi/blob/b9863d73c08fcdd2337dc80a8b5e0917e18b036c/src/lib/Use... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | reentrancy | true | false | ## Gas: Use uint256(1)/uint256(2) instead for true and false boolean states
### Description
Use uint256(1) and uint256(2) for true/false to avoid a Gwarmaccess (100 gas), and to avoid Gsset (20000 gas) when changing from ‘false’ to ‘true’, after having been ‘true’ in the past.
see source:
https://github.com/OpenZepp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Standardize Logging Across the Bridge Implementation
### Description
The current implementation uses a mix of logging methods, including fmt.Println, log.Println, and direct panic calls. This inconsistency makes it difficult to manage log levels and format logs uniformly across the bridge system.
Current ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Budget cap will not account for transfers of approved or permitted ERC20 tokens
### Description
`ApprovalVotingModule.sol` contains a feature where the governor can input a `budgetToken` and a `budgetAmount`, and the module ensures that passed proposals cannot spend more than this amount of this token.
This ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `require()` or `revert()` statements that check input arguments should be at the top of the function
### Description
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables, function calls, and calculations. By doing these checks first, the function is able to revert before wasting... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Proof Can Be Verified Using Unexisting leafIndex ✓ Fixed
### Description
In the `getStorageValues` function of the `LineaSparseProofVerifier` contract, the `proof` bytes variable is passed, which after the `abi.decode` operation is decoded to the `blockNo` variable, `accountProof` struct, and `storageProofs... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: `Exchange._liquidate` function can cause liquidator to burn too much `powerPerp` tokens
### Description
When calling the following `Exchange._liquidate` function, `uint256 totalCollateralReturned = shortCollateral.liquidate(positionId, debtRepaying, msg.sender)` is executed.
In the following `ShortCollatera... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: optimization
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
ERC20Distribution.sol - In the purchaseTokens, The result of the transfering _fiat_token is boolean. So there is no need to compare with true, It will cause more gas consumption.
**Recommendation**: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: M14] Contracts not using safe math
### Description
###### Medium
The contracts [`CurrencyGovernance`](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/51b65c5c7af455391af2bc30d13d761566d8c236/contracts/inflation/CurrencyGovernance.sol) and [`Inflation`](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/51b65c5c7af... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: CDP.sol update overwrites user’s credit on every positive increment
### Description
## Handle
harleythedog
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Within CDP.sol (https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-11-yaxis/blob/main/contracts/v3/alchemix/libraries/alchemist/CDP.sol) there is a function called update. This fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Event is missing `indexed` fields
### Description
Each `event` should use three `indexed` fields if there are three or more fields
1. File: src/interfaces/IAxelarGateway.sol (lines [10-16](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-axelar/blob/f1c8bfc16f82a27797f61cb3a310c0f936dce567/src/interfaces/IAxelarGateway... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | DOS | true | true |
<https://github.com/rabbitholegg/quest-protocol/blob/8c4c1f71221570b14a0479c216583342bd652d8d/contracts/Quest.sol#L99><br>
<https://github.com/rabbitholegg/quest-protocol/blob/8c4c1f71221570b14a0479c216583342bd652d8d/contracts/RabbitHoleReceipt.sol#L117-L133>
`claim` function can be summaraized in next steps:
1. Ch... | Code4rena | 5 | RabbitHole |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Disconnected Staking Whitelist Status
### Description
**Update**
The staking whitelist feature was removed from the airdrop contracts in commit `cf6d331a8ae8257ebeec65ba56c69b419eaaa76c`.
**Description:** During contract construction, the status of the whitelist is fetched from the `STAKING` contract and set ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Cannot liquidate positions with only a single debtShare
### Description
In [`BetaBank`](https://github.com/beta-finance/beta-private/blob/9e73eaf40e5118125d6925b29e4fb9ad8bf8e113/contracts/BetaBank.sol), the [`liquidate`](https://github.com/beta-finance/beta-private/blob/9e73eaf40e5118125d6925b29e4fb9ad8bf8e11... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: LienToken.transferFrom does not update a public vault's bookkeeping parameters when a lien is transferred to it.
### Description
## Severity: Critical Risk
**Context:** `LienToken.sol#L303`
**Description:**
When `transferFrom` is called, there is no check to determine whether the `from` or `to` parameters... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Add check for 0 amount
### Description
**Description**
Line 29, Burn function has no checks for 0 amount. It can lead to accidental transactions,
which will be confirmed and mined but will have no effect. Though they can be misleading,
due to the errors of the caller, or errors connected to the frontend valid... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Using deprecated function in Chainlink
### Description
To convert from USD to input token amount, `StrategyV5Chainlink` uses `IChainlinkAggregatorV3.latestAnswer`. However the function `latestAnswer` is deprecated by Chainlink. This deprecated function usage is also observed in other libraries, such as `Cha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: An attacker can force 0shares to be minted for a liquidity provider
### Description
If there are no outstanding long positions, an attacker can front-run a call to `addLiquidity(...)` and open a maximum possible short position such that `z = 0`. When the liquidity provider's call goes through, the `_updateLiq... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Liquidators can pay less than required to completely liquidate the private collateral balance of an uncollateralized position
### Description
When a user deposits in the `WiseLending` contract he can make a private deposit (pure) which allows his deposits not to be used as collateral or a normal deposit. He c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Removing Redundant Calculations
### Description
## Code Optimization in logic.move
During the execution of `update_state` in `logic.move`, the time difference is calculated separately within the `calculate_compounded_interest` and `calculate_linear_interest` functions. To enhance code efficiency and minimize ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Misleading `setLevel()` Governance Check with `onlyOwner`
### Description
The `setLevel()` uses `onlyOwner` and also enforces `msg.sender == levelOwner`. Given `initialize(address _levelOwner, address _initialOwner)` can set different addresses, the effective authority is the `levelOwner`. The `onlyOwner` modi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: RewardDistributor: Limit native fund transfers to `bribeVault`
### Description
Since the only source of native fund transfers is expected to be the `bribeVault` contract, it would be good to restrict incoming fund transfers from other sources to prevent accidental transfers. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Unchecked return value in Ownable contract
### Description
In the [`Ownable`](https://github.com/AugurProject/augur/blob/9a33c3269e812d0cb66d49b61a72db58e32e4749/packages/augur-core/source/contracts/libraries/Ownable.sol) [contract](https://github.com/AugurProject/augur/blob/9a33c3269e812d0cb66d49b61a72db58... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Lack of access control in withdraw entry point
### Description
The `withdraw` function of the **fund** contract allows withdrawing previously unstaked tokens.
Since this function is used in both internal and external calls, the **user** entry is needed to specify the user address that receives the withdrawal.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: exchangeRate is not up to date in case if vault that is off is changed to on
### Description
`exchangeRate` is not up to date in case if vault that is off is changed to on. Depositors and withdrawers will use old `exchangeRate` that will be less than in reality.
### Impact
Incorrect shares calculation
###... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Users cannot deposit only Jetton to their funding wallet
### Description
The gas check in the `OrderJettonNotification` handler of the `PixelswapSettlement` contract ensures that the TON sent by the user is more than the value of the `gas_check_jetton_notification` parameter, which is 500 millitons, and that t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing DisableInitializers
### Description
**Impact**
The following contracts are now upgradeable
They do not `disableInitializers` on the logic
This is a code smell, I have yet to weaponize
And due to how the system works I doubt it will cause many issues
https://github.com/subvisual/quill/blob/d4a5dcc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory’s withdraw can become frozen on zero reward token transfers
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-factorydao/blob/db415804c06143d8af6880bc4cda7222e5463c0e/contracts/PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory.sol#L230-L230
## Vulnerability details
Rewar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Deployer wallet retains ability to spoof validated senders after ownership transfer
### Description
### Lines of code
### Impact
The InterchainTokenService is deployed using [create3](). This means, that its address depends on the address of the deployer wallet, the address of the `Create3Deployer` contr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | upgrade | true | false | ## Low: `UnstakeCooldown::balance` requires a different token contract than the actual token that is reporting the balance for
### Description
The `UnstakeCooldown` contract is used when withdrawing `USDe`. It is meant to allow the system to request the cooldown of `sUSDe` on the Ethena contract and then `unstake` the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: rpc::pay_redeem_token_htlc() cannot be executed due to invalid hex decoding
### Description
The following code attempts to parse a string with a quotation mark as hexadecimal:
```rust
let tx = match hex::decode(a["tx"].to_string()) {
```
This will always fail with the error `InvalidHexCharacter { c: '"', ind... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Insu�ficient Testing and Validation of VM Correctness
### Description
The RandomX codebase lacks test coverage validating the semantics of the virtual machine (VM). Trail of Bits devoted half of this engagement (one person-week) to assessing the general security properties of the algorithm implementation. Howev... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Receipt Verification May Not Be Valid
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Mitigated" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> There is no way to retrieve the return value off-chain, so PheasantNetwork does not handle ERC20 tokens that return false. However, cases where ERC20 tokens re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Refund Ether | false | true |
[PA1D.sol#L391](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph/blob/f8c2eae866280a1acfdc8a8352401ed031be1373/contracts/enforcer/PA1D.sol#L391)<br>
[PA1D.sol#L395](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph/blob/f8c2eae866280a1acfdc8a8352401ed031be1373/contracts/enforcer/PA1D.sol#L395)<br>
Payout recipients can ... | Code4rena | 4 | Holograph |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Fixed liquidator reward based on MCR may cause protocol losses
### Description
The liquidation mechanism calculates liquidator rewards based on the vault's MCR value (`@1>`), which can lead to unnecessary protocol losses even if the position is still solvent (collateral can cover debt).
The issue arises be... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Bidder's payout claim could fail due to validation checks in LinearVesting
### Description
Bidder's payout claim will fail due to validation checks in LinearVesting after the expiry timestamp
### Impact
Bidder's won't be able claim payouts from auction after the derivative expiry timestamp
### Recommendat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use != 0 instead of > 0 for unsigned integer comparison
### Description
**Description:**
To save gas in comparison you can use ≠ 0 instead of > 0
**Recommendations:**
Change the comparison from > 0 to != 0. ![](Aspose.Words.8685a4cb-16aa-442b-8cd3-a7ceb982dc2f.025.png | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Changing default reserved token beneficiary may result in wrong beneficiary for tier
### Description
When the `reservedTokenBeneficiary` of a tier is equal to `defaultReservedTokenBeneficiaryOf[msg.sender]`, it is not explicitly set for this tier. This generally works well because in the function `reservedT... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: The liquidationsQueue processing is not generic
### Description
The `liquidationsQueue` is currently only used in one router: `ERC4626Router`. However, it is more logical to use it for all available routers.
### Recommendation
Consider making the `liquidationsQueue` more generic:
- Possibly move `_enforceLiq... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Privileged addresses can be transferred without confirmation even to invalid values
### Description
An incorrect use of the functions to set privileged addresses in contracts can irreversibly set them to invalid addresses, such as `0x0`. The owner or controller of the contracts can change privileged addresses u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Replace inline assembly with `account.code.length`
### Description
`.code.length` can be used in Solidity >= 0.8.0 to access an account's code size and check if it is a contract without inline assembly.
[`VoterID#isContract`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-factorydao/blob/e22a562c01c533b8765229387894cc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: No check for zero address
### Description
At the line https://github.com/aave/governance-crosschain-bridges/blob/763ef5da8befff3a129443a3ff4ef7ca4d3bb446/contracts/BridgeExecutorBase.sol#L207 is assigned to the variable `targets` of type `address`.
But there is no check for the value of this variable. If th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [18] `require()` or `revert()` statements that check input arguments should be at the top of the function
### Description
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables
*There are 3 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-backd/blob/2a5664d35cde5b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Configured token decimals are not validated against token's decimals() function
### Description
[Link to instance](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-05-munchables/blob/57dff486c3cd905f21b330c2157fe23da2a4807d/src/managers/LockManager.sol#L115)
The function does not validate `_tokenData.decimals` for the `_to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Integer Overflow in revokeStableMaster()
### Description
Description
TherevokeStableMaster() function is used to revoke a StableMaster contract from the Core contract,
and therefore removes the related stablecoin from stablecoinList . This function assumes there is always at
least one stablecoin in stablecoinL... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Contract check can be bypassed
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
In Contract PNFTToken.sol, the method isContract(...) checks if any given account is a contract or not. Here it will return a false value when an account is a contract under construction.
*... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing LICENSE
### Description
The license has recently been modified to GPL-3.0. A LICENSE or COPYING file is required to be distributed with the code per GNU specification.
### Recommendation
Add a LICENSE or COPYING file to the repository for license adherence. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: Interest accrued could be zero for small decimal tokens
### Description
_Submitted by hickuphh3_
[PooledCreditLine.sol#L1215-L1221](https://github.com/sublime-finance/sublime-v1/blob/46536a6d25df4264c1b217bd3232af30355dcb95/contracts/PooledCreditLine/PooledCreditLine.sol#L1215-L1221)
Interest is calculate... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: Funds may be stuck when `redeeming` for Illuminate
### Description
_Submitted by Picodes, also found by auditor0517, Chom, cryptphi, csanuragjain, hansfriese, hyh, kenzo, kirk-baird, Lambda, pashov, unforgiven, and zer0dot_
Funds may be stuck when `redeeming` for Illuminate.
### Proof of Concept
Assuming t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Business Logic | true | false | ## Severity: Critical Risk
**Context:** OperatorsRegistry.1.sol#L628
**Description:**
In `pickNextValidatorsToExitFromActiveOperators`, `OperatorsV2.CachedOperator[] memory operators` does not necessarily have the same order as the actual `OperatorsV2`'s operators, since the ones that don't have `_hasExitableKeys` ... | Spearbit | 4 | Liquid Collective |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | false | false | ## High: Incorrect Calculation of Minimum Collateral Due to Ignored Decimal Precision
### Description
The function **CalcMinCollateral** in the keeper package is designed to calculate the minimum collateral required to open a position based on the provided leverage. However, the current implementation does not correct... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Cache array length outside of loops and consider unchecked loop incrementing
### Description
Cache array length outside of loops and consider using `unchecked {++i;}` if not compiling with `solc --ir-optimized --optimize`:
File: `BeefyQIVault.sol`
```solidity
210: for (uint i; i < rewardTokens.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: User can pause all auctions by overflow in mid-price average
### Description
Unchecked addition of `best_bid_price` and `best_ask_price` when saving mid price can cause a global auction pause for all traders as an attacker can place one very high-price ask and one small-price bid so both best prices exist; ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: No validation of the address parameter value in contract constructor
### Description
The variable is assigned the value of the constructor input parameter. But this parameter is not checked before this. If the value turns out to be zero, then it will be necessary to redeploy the contract, since there is no ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing events in methods called only by Operator and Admin
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
In the contract PendleMarketDepositHelper.sol, the methods setPoolInfo(...), removePoolInfo(...), and setOperator(...) make updated but do not emit logs.
**Recomm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect assumption of fixed 1e18 scaling in Pendle PT Oracle Rate
### Description
The `OraclePendlePT` contract assumes that the `getPtToSyRate()` function from Pendle's oracle always returns a rate scaled to 1e18. However, some Pendle markets (e.g., 0x83916356556f51dcBcB226202c3efeEfc88d5eaA) return valu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Events lacking
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
no events emitted in admin/gov setters:
Vester.sol/VesterNLP
setHandler()
setNarwhalPool() - setTradingVault()
setHasMaxVestableAmount()
setTransferredAverageStakedAmounts()
settransferredCumulativeRewards()
In TradingVau... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Allowing Zero Value Locks and Minting
### Description
The `lockLiquidity` function does not prevent the creation of a locked liquidity entry when the calculated `lpAmountOut` is zero. Similarly, `addLiquidity` does not restrict minting when `lpAmountOut` is zero. These issues can result in:
1. **Operational E... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unsanitized Token Symbol and Name May Allow an Attacker to Achieve Cross Site Scripting in the Front End
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: TeaVaultAmbientFactory.sol#createVault
**Description**:
The TeaVaultAmbientFactory allows a pool owner to create a new vault taking ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Basis Points Across Contracts
### Description
Different contracts use **inconsistent basis point scales**:
* `FeeManager`: Uses `BASIS_POINTS_X10 = 1e6` and `BASIS_POINTS = 1e5`.
* `User`: Uses `REFERRAL_BASIS_POINTS = 1e10`.
This inconsistency can:
1. **Confuse Integrators and Frontend Develop... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | true | false | ## High: SponsorVault sponsors full transfer amount in reimburseLiquidityFees()
### Description
## Vulnerability Report
**Severity**: High Risk
**Context**: BridgeFacet.sol#L660-L663
**Description**: The `BridgeFacet` passes `args.amount` as `_liquidityFee` when calling `reimburseLiquidityFees`. Instead of sponso... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Circuit breakers are not considered when processing Chainlink's answer
### Description
Every Chainlink feed has a minimum and maximum price. However, due to the circuit breaker, if an asset's price moves outside these limits, the provided answer will still be capped.
This can lead to an incorrect price if ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Emit events from privileged operations
### Description
Consider adding events to protected functions that change contract state. This enables you to monitor off chain for suspicious activity, and allows end users to observe and trust changes to these parameters.
* [`VoterId#setTokenURI`](https://github.com/c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `getCurveStatus` returns incorrect values
### Description
The function redeclares variables with the same names to receive the results of the `_getCurveStatus` function. Since the named return variables of the `getCurveStatus` function are not updated, it cannot return the correct status.
Set values directly... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `AgentDAO::_castVote` doesn’t check the array of votes emitted, which determine the number of battles fought in `EloCalculator.sol`, allowing the user to increase the ELO of a contribution unfairly, inflating the maturity/impact of `ServiceNFTs`
### Description
### Finding description
We have this in their... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Missing input validation checks on contract initialize/constructor
### Description
Contract initialize/constructor input parameters should always be validated to prevent the creation/initialization of a contract in a wrong/inconsistent state.
### Recommendation
Consider implementing the following changes. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Validation | true | true | **Description:** The `AllocationVesting` contract gives points on vesting schedules to team members, investors, influencers and anyone else entitled to a token allocation.
`AllocationVesting::transferPoints` allows users to transfer points however this function does not correctly [handle](https://github.com/Bima-Labs/... | Cyfrin | 5 | Bima |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Off ramp owners might not retrieve assets from `BOB Gateway`
### Description
Based on the Bob's documentation(https://docs.gobob.xyz/learn/introduction/roadmap/), `BOB is a Hybrid L2 (Layer 2), a new kind of rollup that inherits Bitcoin security while providing trust-minimized bridges directly to multiple L1s.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: `Liquidate` Event Emitted Incorrectly
### Description
**Update**
The issue has been fixed by only emitting the event if the actual liquidation happens.
**File(s) affected:**`credit/CreditCaller.sol`
**Description:** Liquidation can only occur if the position's health check fails. However, when calling `liqui... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Fees can be changed while a loan is active
### Description
All fees in the protocol are calculated using the current fees, as informed by the FeeController contract. However, fees can be changed by the team at any time, so the effective rollover and closure fees that the users will pay can change once their lo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `setStartBlock()` doesn't change the block at which already existing pools will start accumulating points
### Description
The function [setStartBlock()](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-05-sophon/blob/main/farming-contracts/contracts/farm/SophonFarming.sol#L272) can be called by the owner to change th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: State variables should be cached in stack variables rather than re-reading them from storage
### Description
State variables should be cached in stack variables rather than re-reading them from storage.
* `MysteryBox::fulfillRandomWords()` reads `vrfRequests[_requestId]` 3 times; consider reading it once into... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Account Abstraction | false | true |
[contracts/smart-contract-wallet/aa-4337/core/EntryPoint.sol#L68-L86](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-biconomy/blob/main/scw-contracts/contracts/smart-contract-wallet/aa-4337/core/EntryPoint.sol#L68-L86)<br>
[contracts/smart-contract-wallet/aa-4337/core/EntryPoint.sol#L168-L190](https://github.com/code-423n4/202... | Code4rena | 3 | Biconomy |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Naming of Error `ClaimstatusDoesntAllowNonOwnerClaims`
### Description
The `ClaimstatusDoesntAllowNonOwnerClaims` error is incorrectly named, which may lead to confusion for developers and users of the contract. The name does not conform to standard naming conventions and does not provide a clear u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `checkpoint` function is not called before staking which can cause loss of rewards for already staked services
### Description
Before allowing anyone to stake a service id, the `checkpoint` function should be called in order to distribute already present rewards in the contract and thus update the `availabl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: NFTFloorOracle’s assets will use old prices if added back after removal
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-paraspace/blob/c6820a279c64a299a783955749fdc977de8f0449/paraspace-core/contracts/misc/NFTFloorOracle.sol#L296-L305
## Vulnerability details
`assetFeederMap` mapp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Check For Early Stakers
### Description
**Severity** - High
**Status** - Resolved
**Description**
For the first 99 stakers the minimum staking amount is 8e6 ether tokens (compared to 16e6 ether tokens for non-early stakers) , the code which verifies if the staker is an early staker is →
It check... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Potential loss of funds if `msg.value` exceeds `amountIn + executionPrice`
### Description
If a user conducts a cross-chain operation with `WRAP_CODE`, they transfer native currency to the router and, in return, receive WETH. At the same time, the user pays an `executionPrice` for the cross-chain transactio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Withdraw Pattern | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-blueberry-judging/issues/109
## Found by
berndartmueller, carrot, minhtrng, 0Kage, Jeiwan, chaduke, koxuan, Ruhum, cergyk, rbserver, stent, saian, XKET, GimelSec
## Summary
Soft vault shares are issued against interest bearing tokens issued by `Compound` protocol in... | Sherlock | 5 | Blueberry |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Minter user can confiscate any user tokens
### Description
ERC20CV’s minter has the unexpected right to move tokens from any users, increasing the risks associated with the minter account.
The administrator of the contract can design a special user called a minter:
```python
@public
def set_minter(_minter: ad... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Redundant Check in Balance and Debt Verification
### Description
The provided code contains a redundant check that can be streamlined for efficiency. The `require` statement verifies that the balance plus 1 wei is greater than or equal to the debt, followed by an `if` statement that returns if the balance is l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Optimizations on WERC721.sol contract
### Description
The factory global state variable from the `WERC721.sol` contract can be set as immutable as it is only initialized in the constructor with the `msg.sender` value and is never modified, nor does it have a setter. Additionally, the `initialize` function can ... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.