prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Relayer and System Owner Roles Must Be Separated
### Description
**Update**
However, we find it concerning that the relayer can still use the function `executeManagerUpdate()` to modify the current `bondManager`, `disputeManager`, or `pheasantNetworkParameters` addresses. This raises potential issues as these... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Inadequate gas reservation in `Gateway.handle()` try-catch block enables permanent DOS via batch-level gas exhaustion
### Description
`Gateway.handle()` uses inadequate gas management when processing batched messages, reserving only `GAS_FAIL_MESSAGE_STORAGE` (40,000 gas) for the current message via `gaslef... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: REDUNDANT SAFEMATH FUNCTIONS USAGE IN CONTRACT
### Description
In a Solidity contract, the developer has included multiple instances of the SafeMath library functions, even though only one instance is needed. Including redundant instances of the SafeMath library can lead to an increase in the size of the contr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Platform Wallet not exception for Maximum Holdings Per Investor Limits
### Description
The `preIssuanceCheck` function in `ComplianceServiceRegulated.sol` exhibits inconsistent behavior regarding platform wallet exemptions for investor holdings limits. While platform wallets are properly exempted from the mini... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect non-negative check on unsigned integer `_liquidity`
### Description
The condition if (`_liquidity <= 0`) is incorrect because `_liquidity` is `uint128` being less than 0 is impossible. The only meaningful edge case is when `_liquidity == 0`, which should be explicitly checked. The incorrect condition... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Account Can Be Created With Arbitrary Manager Address
### Description
Description
Funds can be locked due to allowing SubAccounts to be setup with arbitrary manager addresses.
When creating an account through SubAccounts::createAccount() , a user can specify an arbitrary address as the
manager. This allows th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Unused error
### Description
There is an unused error `IncorrectExitedValidators`: https://github.com/lidofinance/core/blob/efeff81c18f85451ebf98e8fd8bb78b8eb0095f6/contracts/0.8.9/sanity_checks/OracleReportSanityChecker.sol#L926.
### Recommendation
We recommend removing the unused error. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Check for coutry code is not sufficient
### Description
In the `CountryValidator` class, the method `validateCountryCode` is intended to check the validity of a given country code. However, it currently does not correctly filter out invalid codes. As a result, inputs such as XX or YYX, which are not valid [ISO... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: State Variable Visibility Is Not Set
### Description
Visibility is not set for the `token` state variable.
### Recommendation
It is best practice to set the visibility of state variables explicitly. The default visibility for "token" is internal. Other possible visibility settings are public and private.
#... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [05] Inexpedient code lines
### Description
In the function below, the if block already dictates that `getUnvestedAmount() == 0` manages to avoid a revert. Hence, consider refactoring the following code lines as it makes no sense adding 0 value `getUnvestedAmount()` of to the addend, `amount`:
https://git... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Minimum order size should be positive
### Description
## Aob Market Initialization
In Aob, markets are initialized with a `min_base_order_size` quantity. The goal is to prevent small orders from flooding the market.
If `min_base_order_size` is set to zero, the market is technically functional. However, user... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Authority address can (maliciously or accidentally) steal user funds from the vault
### Description
Rather than using an oracle, the system relies on an `authority` address (stored on the `HashStore.sol` contract) to set the `nominals` for each asset in the vault. These nominal values are used in rebalancin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: maxWithdraw() and maxRedeem() doesn’t return correct value which can make other contracts fail while working with protocol
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-gogopool/blob/aec9928d8bdce8a5a4efe45f54c39d4fc7313731/contracts/contract/tokens/TokenggAVAX.sol#L215-L223
https:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Potential desynchronization between asset transfer and agreement creation in the `TimeLock`
### Description
In the audited code, asset transfer and agreement creation are treated as two separate processes.
- Assets can be transferred to the `TimeLock` without creating an agreement, leading to them being fr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | other | true | true | ## High: `Licredity::decreaseDebtShare` bypasses interest accrual
### Description
A borrower can call [`Licredity::decreaseDebtShare`](https://github.com/Licredity/licredity-v1-core/blob/e8ae10a7d9f27529e39ca277bf56cef01a807817/src/Licredity.sol#L472-L536) to repay their loan. Because this call can only reduce debt, i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Errors and omissions in events throughout codebase
### Description
Throughout the codebase, events are used to signify when changes are made to the contracts. However many events lack indexed parameters, are missing important parameters, or emit erroneous parameters. Additionally collisions between events e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use event indexing for faster off-chain parameter lookup
### Description
Events in `IGlobalRegistryService` should use `indexed` keywords on the 3 most important parameters per event to enable faster lookup by those parameters off-chain. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Protocol fee updates cause loss of accrued fees
### Description
_Resolved_
The `setMarketProtocolFee` function in `Covenant.sol` updates a market's protocol fee rate without first accruing the fees owed under the current rate. This causes the protocol to lose all fees that should have been collected between t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: ClearingHouse margin calculations will break up if an AMM returning non-6 decimals positions be white listed
### Description
_Submitted by hyh_
It is assumed that VAMM returned positions have exactly `6` decimals for all AMMs white listed in ClearingHouse.
In the same time an array of different AMMs/VAMM... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: State variables can be packed into fewer storage slots
### Description
These state variables can be packed together to use less storage slots:
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/7bbb55fca61e6bae29e57133c1e45806cbb17aa4/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowCore.sol#L297 | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Redundant _disableInitializers in Constructor ✓ Fixed
### Description
Contract `FiatTokenV1` inherits from contracts `BlacklistableV1` and `RescuableV1`, the two parent contracts both have `_disableInitializers` in their constructors to prevent uninitialized contract being initialized by the attackers, it’s n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: `nonReentrant` is not the first modifier
### Description
**Description:** In `FeeManager::withdrawProtocolFee`, `nonReentrant` is not the first modifier. To protect against reentrancy in other modifiers, the `nonReentrant` modifier should be the first modifier in the list of modifiers. Consider putting `nonRee... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Consider to avoid reverting inside GovernanceCCIPReceiver._ccipReceive
### Description
When `GovernanceCCIPReceiver._ccipReceive` is executed by the CCIP framework and the logic reverts in any way, the message could be "manually executed" (retried) in a permissionless way by interacting directly with Chainlink... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: | Limit Increase With Same Block Pricing
### Description
**Description**
In `validateOracleBlockNumbersForPosition`, both conditionals on lines 295 and 306 handle the `LimitIncrease` order type but with different oracle block requirements.
During execution, the first `if` statement is entered, therefore a `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Wolf Burn Mechanism Can Be Abused by Splitting SHEEP Across Multiple Wallets
### Description
In the SheepCoin ecosystem, SHEEP token holders can initially mitigate the risk of wolf burns by splitting their holdings into multiple wallets, each containing an amount less than ONE (1 * 1018 wei, or 1 SHEEP token),... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Missing Event Emission for Admin Transfers
### Description
Function `transfer_admin` from `clmm_lp_farming` program changes an important state of the program but does not emit any events.
### Recommendation
Consider emitting events from this function for better off-chain tracking and transparency. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: A regular Cosmos SDK message can be disguised as an EVM transaction, causing `ListenFinalizeBlock` to error which prevents the block from being indexed
### Description
### Finding description and impact
The indexer’s [`ListenFinalizeBlock()`](https://github.com/initia-labs/minievm/blob/744563dc6a642f054b4543... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing zero address validation for feeToSetter.
### Description
**Description**
Missing zero address validation of feeToSetter.
Location:
./core/contracts/AdaswapFactory.sol #9
./core/contracts/AdaswapFactory.sol #50
**Recommendation**
It is recommended to validate the variable_feeToSetter to contain a non... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: [3] `deployERC20()` does not have a reentrancy guard
### Description
`deployERC20()` increments the `state_lastEventNonce` so it's possible for the nonce to be incremented by a transfer hook. I don't see a way to exploit this given the code in scope, but perhaps some other area relies on event nonces happening... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: EIP-155 is not enforced, allowing attackers/malicious operators to profit from replaying transactions
### Description
### Lines of code
### Vulnerability details
The L2 `DefaultAccount.validateTransaction` function and transaction encoding process in the bootloader do not enforce EIP-155. If the `reserve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Fee-less loans
### Description
The [`calculateLoanOriginationFee` function](https://gitlab.com/aave-tech/dlp/contracts/blob/1f8e5e65a99a887a5a13ad9af6486ebf93f57d02/contracts/fees/FeeProvider.sol#L27) of the `FeeProvider` contract is in charge of calculating the origination fee for a loan of the specified a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | true | ## Low: setGlobalKey is susceptible to signature replay
### Description
The `DharmaKeyRegistry` contract attempts to validate that an owner calling `setGlobalKey` has a corresponding private key by requiring a valid signature (Figure 2.1). However, this check does not guarantee that this is the case. While the replay ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: No opt-out of creating a safe without looping over nonces
### Description
When creating new safes, in either subAccounts or main console accounts, a nonce is used to create the salt used by the SafeDeployer:
[`SafeDeployer::_createSafe`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-brahma/blob/main/contracts/src/cor... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: closeTrove can create a Bank Run when canMint is set to false
### Description
Recovery Mode exists with the goal of bringing the TCR back up to a higher value. In the original Liquity Model, during Recovery Mode, liquidations can be performed at a higher CR, and Debt Redistribution is performed by preventing T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Upgradability
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> Most of the contracts in zNS (except ZNSAccessController) are upgradeable UUPS Proxies. We understand the limitations it entails, so please consider the following: We decided to go with upgrade... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect amount taken
### Description
_Submitted by csanuragjain, also found by 0xf15ers and gzeon_
It was observed that in repayBorrowFresh function, User is asked to send repayAmount instead of repayAmountFinal. This can lead to loss of user funds as user might be paying extra
### Proof of Concept
1.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Use low level `call()` to prevent gas griefing attacks when returned data not required
### Description
Using `call()` when the returned data is not required unnecessarily exposes to gas griefing attacks from huge returned data payload. For [example](https://github.com/Earnft/smart-contracts/blob/43d3a8305dd6c7... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: Change function visibility from public to external
### Description
_Submitted by 0xRajeev_
Functions `getTimeLockCount()`, `getTimeLockERC721Count()`, `timeLockERC721()`, `timeUnlockERC721()`, `timeLockERC20()` and `timeUnlockERC20()` are never called from within contracts but yet declared public. Their visib... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary assembly in `MultiCallOptimizedSwapper.sol`
### Description
[MultiCallOptimizer.sol](https://github.com/yearn/hardhat-monorepo/blob/ecc0b5147992b34c315e08af170ceb4a5fe071ee/packages/yswaps/contracts/swappers/async/MultiCallOptimizedSwapper.sol) contract is using assembly most likely for gas optimiz... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: TRST-H-1 User fee token balance can be drained in a single operation by a malicious bot
### Description
**Description:**
In `_buildFeeExecutable()`, BrahRouter calculates the total fee charged to the wallet. It uses tx. gas price to get the gas price specified by the bot.
**Impact:**
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Contract Owner Possesses Too Many Privileges
### Description
[ExecutionDelegate.sol#L119](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-blur/blob/2fdaa6e13b544c8c11d1c022a575f16c3a72e3bf/contracts/ExecutionDelegate.sol#L119)
To use the protocol (buy/sell NFTs), users must approve the `ExecutionDelegate` to handle ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: AWS security group allowing all tra�fic exists
### Description
The Terraform configuration provided for `setup-iac` configures a security group rule for HTTPS that allows any incoming address. Security groups are used to constrain incoming and outgoing traffic. However, `setup_public_allow_https` allows all inc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Binary search implementation may not always find the optimal solution
### Description
**Description:**
`VeryFastRouter::_findMaxFillableAmtForBuy` and `VeryFastRouter::_findMaxFillableAmtForSell` utilize binary search to determine the maximum trade amount. The binary search seeks a solution in a linear, sor... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing slippage checks in addLiquidity and removeLiquidity methods
### Description
The `addLiquidity` method does not include a slippage check for the calculated liquidity, which could result in users receiving less liquidity than expected due to price fluctuations. Similarly, the `removeLiquidity` method pas... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Modifiers duplicated
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: Admin.sol
**Description**
Functions `addOperator()` and `removeOperator()` carry out redundant checks. Modifier `onlyAdmin` checks whether the caller is wallet or not (i.e. owner of contract as referred to in initiali... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: rewardTokens removed from WAuraPool/WConvexPools will be lost forever
### Description
pendingRewards pulls a fresh count of reward tokens each time it is called. This is problematic if reward tokens are ever removed from the the underlying Aura/Convex pools because it means that they will no longer be distr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: RLP decoding throws on encodings that report a length greater than Integer.MAX_VALUE
### Description
The Pantheon RLP implementation uses Java’s signed integers for decoding, which means that any RLP string, byte array, or list that reports to be larger than 231-1 will cause an integer overflow, regardless o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Conditional check can be performed during variable initialization
### Description
In the `DistributionCreator._createDistribution()` function the `userFeeRebate` value is used when calculating the `distributionAmountMinusFees` if the `UniswapV3Pool` tokens are not whitelisted. Before the `distributionAmountMin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: ConfigHub.canOpenPair() does not guarantee contracts are of the correct type
### Description
Throughout the protocol, `ConfigHub.canOpenPair()` is called to check that addresses passed by the user are valid and whitelisted by the protocol. For example, `CollarTakerNFT.openPairedPosition()` calls `canOpenPair()... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: BuidlUSDCSource can have fewer BUIDL tokens than the minimum redeem criteria
### Description
The `BuidlUSDCSource` contract reports the amount of USDC tokens it can provide through its `availableToWithdraw` function, and redeems the BUIDL tokens it holds in order to get this USDC amount. Due to how the Ondo to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Contracts Do Not Implement Safe Ownership Transfer Pattern
### Description
The current transfer of ownership pattern calls the function `transferOwnership(address newOwner)` which instantly changes the owner to the `newOwner`. This allows the current owner of the contracts to set an arbitrary address (excludin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: The `RiskParameter.liquidationFee` variable is not treated and validated as a percentage value, leading to breaking protocol invariants.
### Description
In Perennial v2.2, the `RiskParameter.liquidationFee` variable held a fixed amount. In Perennial v2.3, it became a percentage value. However, this change i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Remove Test Code isProxied From Constructors
### Description
There are instances of test code across several upgradeable contract constructors:
* [Line 31 of `AukiToken.sol`](https://github.com/aukilabs/auki-contracts/blob/841aa7df56619dcec2af75efcb5ec7faeeaa955c/src/AukiToken.sol#L31)
* [Line 36 of `BurnCon... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | true | false | ## Medium: TraitForgeNft: Generations without a golden god are possible
### Description
The golden god is the special entropy of 999,999. This entropy is set at `slotIndexSelectionPoint` and `numberIndexSelectionPoint` [here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-07-traitforge/blob/279b2887e3d38bc219a05d332cbcb0655b2dc64... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Incorrect function call leads to stale borrowing fees
### Description
Due to an incorrect function call while getting the total borrow fees, the returned fees will be an inaccurate and stale amount. Which will have an impact on liquidity providers
### Impact
Ass fee calculation will not be accurate, liquidit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Erroneous Condition in _setAssetSource
### Description
When the owner sets the parameters for a feed using Pyth, there is a [check](https://github.com/radiant-capital/riz/blob/65ca7bb55550d30388e2b2277fefe5686ab7e4e8/src/OracleRouter.sol#L190) being done over the `feedId` and `feedAddress`. However, because... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Updating the prime rate will change the interest for a time that was already passed
### Description
Updating the prime rate will change the interest for a time that was already passed
### Impact
Updating the price will change rates for a time that has already passed. That is not good as it would cause an i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: PerpDepository has no way to withdraw profits depriving stakers of profits owed
### Description
PerpDepository has no way to calculate or withdraw any profits made by the vault. By [design](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-uxd/blob/main/contracts/integrations/rage-trade/RageDnDepository.sol#L99-L115)... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: winningIndex can be zero
### Description
In the `claimWinning()` function the winner is selected by dividing `randomNumber[i]` by `ticketInfo.lastDrawEligibleCount`:
In case of an exact division, `winningIn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: The `postCheck()` Function in `HookMultiPlexer` Executes in Ascending Order Instead of Descending Order
### Description
The `HookMultiPlexer` is designed to accept adding more than one Hook, the Contract will execute each added Hook `preCheck()` function, then after the execution, it will execute `postCheck... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: `TokenLocker::getTotalWeightAt` should loop until input `week` not `systemWeek`
### Description
`TokenLocker::getTotalWeightAt` should loop until input `week` not `systemWeek`:
```diff
- while (updatedWeek < systemWeek) {
+ while (updatedWeek < week) {
```
The current implementation returns the wrong output w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lines are too long
### Description
Usually lines in source code are limited to [80](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/148677/why-is-80-characters-the-standard-limit-for-code-width) characters. Today's screens are much larger so it's reasonable to stretch this in some cases. Since the file... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: State variables can be packed into fewer storage slots
### Description
If variables occupying the same slot are both written the same function or by the constructor, avoids a separate Gsset (**20000 gas**). Reads of the variables can also be cheaper
*There is 1 instance of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Unable to withdraw extra rewards
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-06-tokemak-judging/issues/565
## Found by
0xGoodess, 0xdeadbeef, Ch\_301, berndartmueller, xiaoming90
Users are unable to withdraw extra rewards due to staking of TOKE that is less than `MIN_STAKE_AMOUNT`, re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: DNA rarity calculation in `AiArenaHelper.dnaToIndex()` can be redesigned to save gas
### Description
`dnaToIndex()` is called inside a loop for all the fighter physical properties (see first link), which consumes a lot of gas due to storage loads. The system of calculating `attributeProbabilityIndex` by loopin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: `_getReferencePoolPriceX96()` will show incorrect price for negative tick deltas in current implementation cause it doesn't round up for them
### Description
Take a look [here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-revert-lend/blob/457230945a49878eefdc1001796b10638c1e7584/src/V3Oracle.sol#L357-L374).
This f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Pool amount adjustments for collateral decreases aren't undone if swaps are successful
### Description
Pool amount adjustments, which are added to storage as a temporary accounting tracking mechanism, aren't undone if swaps are successful
### Impact
The value is looked up and used in `getNextPoolAmountsParam... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Create a short call order with non empty floor makes the option impossible to exercise and withdraw
### Description
_Submitted by zzzitron, also found by danb, Kenshin, Metatron, minhquanym, and PwnedNoMore_
**HIGH** - assets can be lost
If a short call order is created with non empty floorTokens array, the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Unlocked Pragma
### Description
**Update**
The Hifi team mitigated the issue by limiting the range for the floating Solidity version to remain within `0.8.x` to avoid upgrading to a breaking version. However, note that different versions of the compiler within the `0.8.x` range may still be used.
**File(s) af... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: feeTHUSDAmount can be computed in a simpler way
### Description
The expression:
```plaintext
feeTHUSDAmount = addBps(thusdQty, int(fee)) - thusdQty;
```
can be simplified to:
```plaintext
thusdQty * fee / MAX_BPS
```
### Recommendation
Consider if you need the helper function `addBps` and refactor to remov... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: Funds might get stuck in the pool due to totaldeposited underflow
### Description
The `totalDeposited` variable tracks the amount that gets deposited and withdrawn from the Omnipool. However, the amount withdrawn can be greater than the amount deposited. Consider the following scenario:
- The protocol deposit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | true | ## Medium: Missing Chainlink price feed safety checks Status: Partially Resolved
### Description
Certain safety checks that should be used to validate data returned from `latestRoundData` and `getRoundData` are missing:
- `require(updatedAt > 0)`: This checks whether the requested round is valid and complete; an exam... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Unneeded calculations
### Description
At the line https://github.com/bondappetit/bondappetit-protocol/blob/355180f0aca0b29d60d808f761052956b7a3a159/contracts/Market.sol#L187 contract calculates `product` tokens amount, but line below contract recalculates this variable if `address(productToken) != currency`, s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Solidity compiler optimizations can be dangerous
### Description
In Balancer V2, optional compiler optimizations in Solidity are enabled. There have been several optimization-related bugs in Solidity with security implications, and optimizations are actively being developed. Solidity compiler optimizations are... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Transfers will fail if there 's a transceiver with index greater than or equal to the number of enabled transceivers
### Description
Calls to `quoteDeliveryPrice` will revert if the index of any of the enabled transceivers passed as a parameter is greater than or equal to the `transceiverInstructions` array... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
The client implemented many of the proposed input validation checks and acknowledged the remaining ones in the interest of gas savings.
**Update**
Addressed in: `233bc48a28aa814e74c6627bc9e49a4a0942afbc`.
**File(s) affected:**`PolygonRootCheckpointManager.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Ownership Can Be Renounced
### Description
**Update**
Instead of renouncing ownership, it is transferred to the `PrimexProxyAdmin` contract, which only the `BIG_TIMELOCK_ADMIN` can perform ownership-related features. Please note that the transfer of ownership occurs in the deployment script.
**File(s) affecte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Lack of `_lockTime` validation in `constructor`
### Description
**Description:** The constructor assigns `lockTime = _lockTime` without checking `_lockTime <= MAX_LOCK_TIME`. If an out‑of‑range value is provided, any subsequent call that indexes `reSDLTokenIds[lockTime]` (e.g. in `stakeReleasableTokens` or `wi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Modifications To Rewards And Fees Can Apply Retroactively
### Description
In the `SDIncentiveController` contract, the `updateEmissionRate()` function allows for modifying the emission rate even during an ongoing reward period. This could impact the reward calculation for blocks that have not yet been updated u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Transfer of ETH may unexpectedly fail
### Description
In the [`_withdraw`](https://github.com/mcdexio/mai-protocol-v2/blob/4b198083ec4ae2d6851e101fc44ea333eaa3cd92/contracts/perpetual/Collateral.sol#L84) and [`withdrawFromProtocol`](https://github.com/mcdexio/mai-protocol-v2/blob/4b198083ec4ae2d6851e101fc44ea3... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | false | false | ## Medium: Improper Validation Of create2 Return Value
### Description
## Handle
leastwood
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The `BeaconProxyDeployer.deploy()` function is used to deploy lightweight proxy contracts that act as each asset's vault. The function does not revert properly if there is a failed contrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Broken batch minting feature
### Description
The core minting feature of the protocol is broken due to the mishandling of `msg.value` within the for-loop.
### Impact
Breaks core contract functionality. The batch minting feature, a core feature of the protocol, is broken.
### Recommendation
For each loop, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Missing stale feed check for USDC
### Description
_Acknowledged_
The `SwapImpl::_minOutFromFeeds` function is invoked during swapping operations to calculate the acceptable minimum amount out for the swap given prices obtained from the ETH and USDC oracle feeds. During this call, the code validates the age of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Make `LSSVMPair::call` payable to allow value to be sent with external calls
### Description
Currently, [`LSSVMPair::call`](https://github.com/sudoswap/lssvm2/blob/78d38753b2042d7813132f26e5573c6699b605ef/src/LSSVMPair.sol#L640) simply passes a [value of zero](https://github.com/sudoswap/lssvm2/blob/78d38753b2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Initialize `DropBox::boxIdCounter` to 1 avoiding default initialization to 0
### Description
Initialize `DropBox::boxIdCounter` to 1 avoiding default initialization to 0:
```diff
- uint256 internal boxIdCounter; // Counter for the box ids, starting from 1 (see _assignTierAndMint function)
+ uint256 internal b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: No token recover mechanism when the auction ends without any bid
### Description
In `SpiceAuction` contract, when an auction ends with no bids, the auction tokens are locked into the contract and can't be recovered. `recoverToken` function doesn't help recover the auction token because it limits recoverable... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: SSRF in Transaction Endpoints
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `580b8f9`. The client provided the following explanation: Was mostly fixed in previous changes, however made one more tweak note: /all-transactions is no longer used, but changes have been applied to it for ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Generate perfect code headers every time
### Description
I recommend using header for Solidity code layout and readability:
https://github.com/transmissions11/headers
**[ramenforbreakfast (prePO) commented](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-prepo-findings/issues/127#issuecomment-1404500379):**
> The fol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent implementation between blacklist functions and batch versions
### Description
The blacklist management functions have inconsistent implementations between their single-account and batch versions. The batch functions lack important validations and event emissions that are present in their single-ac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | initialization | true | true | ## Summary
The `StabilityPool` contract's reward distribution has a vulnerability where users can steal all accumulated RAAC rewards through a single deposit/withdrawal transaction. The issue occurs because the reward calculation uses instant deposit ratios rather than time-weighted positions, allowing theft from legi... | Codehawks | 5 | Core Contracts |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: <a name="GAS-6"></a>[GAS-6] Use calldata instead of memory for function arguments that do not get mutated | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: Heavy Blocks May Affect Block Finalization, if the Gas Requirement Exceeds Block Gas Limit
### Description
The `sequencer` takes care of finalizing blocks by submitting proof, blocks’ data, proof type, and parent state root hash. The team mentions that the blocks are finalized every 12s, and under general sce... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Uncontrolled Slippage in `BridgeToken.sendSimple()`
### Description
- https://github.com/defidotmoney/dfm-core/blob/0bde9fb784400d73f434d585aab7d9dd0ad1c679/contracts/bridge/BridgeToken.sol#L154
In the parent contracts, the `_debit()` method is called with the `_minAmountLD` parameter to control slippage. How... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Streamline Error Handling with `require` Statements
### Description
As of Solidity 0.8.26, the preferred method for error handling is using the `require(bool, Error)` statements instead of `if (bool) revert Error`. This modern approach not only streamlines the code but also enhances is readability and gas effi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Faulty Token Limit Check
### Description
## Inaccurate Validation in `execute_rebind`
In `execute_rebind` within `bind`, an inaccurate validation exists concerning the limit on the number of bound tokens in the pool. The `assert` statement, which examines whether `read_tokens(&e).len() < MAX_BOUND_TOKENS`, mi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `Function writing` that does not comply with the `Solidity Style Guide`
### Description
Order of Functions; ordering helps readers identify which functions they can call and to find the constructor and fallback definitions easier. But there are contracts in the project that do not comply with this.
https://do... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: withdrawETH() in GiantPoolBase don’t call _distributeETHRewardsToUserForToken() or _onWithdraw() which would make users to lose their remaining rewards
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-stakehouse/blob/4b6828e9c807f2f7c569e6d721ca1289f7cf7112/contracts/liquid-staking/Gian... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: NFTXStakingZap and NFTXMarketplaceZap’s transferFromERC721 transfer Cryptokitties to the wrong address
### Description
## Handle
hyh
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
`transferFromERC721(address assetAddr, uint256 tokenId, address to)` should transfer from `msg.sender` to `to`.
It transfers to `addres... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Calling ERC20.transferFrom to itself may lead to unexpected behavior
### Description
The `ERC20.transferFrom(src, dst, value)` allows transferring tokens on behalf of another user, using a token allowance mechanism. `DSToken` and `DSWeth` have a different behavior than most of the other ERC20 tokens when the s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: TRST-M-2 SwapHelper.getCalldata should check whitelistedRouters[_router]
### Description
**Description:**
`SwapHelper.getCalldata()` returns data for swap based on the input, and uses
**whitelistedRouters** to limit the **_router** param. The issue here is that when
`setWhitelistedRouters()` sets the **_r... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.