prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [G‑02] Results of calls to `_msgSender()` not cached
### Description
Saves at least **16 gas** per call skipped.
*There are 4 instances of this issue:*
[VTVLVesting.sol#L371](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-vtvl/blob/f68b7f3e61dad0d873b5b5a1e8126b839afeab5f/contracts/VTVLVesting.sol#L371) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: State drift between `BasisTradeVault.totalPendingWithdrawals` and `BasisTradeTailor.withdrawalRequests[pocket]`
### Description
**Description:** `BasisTradeVault` tracks pending withdrawals in `totalPendingWithdrawals` while `BasisTradeTailor` keeps its own `withdrawalRequests[pocket]`. These two counters are ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Asymmetry in event emission for ETH transfers
### Description
The `_safeTransferETHWithFallback`function in the **BeraAuctionHouse** contract emits an event indirectly when the fallback mechanism is triggered via WETH (`weth.deposit` and `weth.transfer`). However, no event is emitted when the direct ETH transf... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | dos | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-11-convergence-judging/issues/131
## Found by
cergyk
## Summary
The bug occurs when `CvgRewards::_setTotalWeight` sets `totalWeightLocked` to zero, leading to a division by zero error in
`CvgRewards::_distributeCvgRewards`, and blocking cycle increments. The blocking ... | Sherlock | 5 | Convergence |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Truncation-Related Issues
### Description
Throughout the compound contracts, truncation issues inherent to EVM operation result in some relatively unavoidable errors. These errors exist when minting cTokens, when redeeming cTokens for their underlying assets, and when liquidating another user’s loan.
In the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Enforcers: Miscellaneous Minor Points.
### Description
#### **General:**
#### A1\. ERC\-165 unused:
Enforcers implement ERC\-165\. While there is no harm in that except higher deployment costs, the motivation for that is unclear since no contract in the DeleGator codebase makes use of that. Making a `suppo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Replay Attack | true | true |
The KYCRegistry contract uses signatures to grant KYC status to the users using the `addKYCAddressViaSignature` function.
However this function does not prevent replaying of signatures in the case where KYC status was revoked from a user.
```solidity
function addKYCAddressViaSignature( ... ) external {
require... | Code4rena | 4 | Ondo Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Price volatility may compromise system integrity Won't Fix
### Description
`SavingAccount.borrow` allows users to borrow funds from the bank. The funds borrowed may be denominated in any asset supported by the system-wide `TokenRegistry`. Borrowed funds come from the system’s existing liquidity: other user... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent use of ETH transfer gas limit parameter
### Description
The `ethTransferGasLimit` parameter is passed to the `Gateway` as part of the `proveBtcTransferArgs` to limit the gas spent and to prevent any possible re-entrancy attacks.
This value is facilitated by the Relayer via a call to `proveBtcTran... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: PrepareVotes() suppresses error from ValidateVoteExtensions()
### Description
If `ValidateVoteExtensions()` errors, the error is not returned; nil is returned. This does not appear to be intentional.
### Recommendation
If this is intentional, add a comment stating such. Otherwise, change the return statement ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Unsupported tokens cannot be withdrawn
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel, also found by kyliek, pedroais, and PPrieditis_
[LiquidityProviders.sol#L273](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-biconomy/blob/db8a1fdddd02e8cc209a4c73ffbb3de210e4a81a/contracts/hyphen/LiquidityProviders.sol#L273)
Supported t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: TSS Nodes Reporting Slashing Are Vulnerable To Front Running
### Description
Reporting nodes can be front run and miss out on rewards. TSS nodes are responsible for broadcasting off-chain node slashing decisions on-chain; however, it is possible for any other user to read this transaction information while ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Avoid Passing Unended Process
### Description
## Documentation on `epoch_was_changed` Functionality
The `epoch_was_changed` function calls `unstake_from_storage` when it needs to obtain Sui by unstaking staked Sui. The process of unstaking from storage is deemed complete if one of the two conditions is met, w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: TRST-L-1 LSP0 ownership functions deviate from specification and reject native tokens
### Description
**Description:**
The LSP specifications define the following functions for LSP0:
However, their implementations are not payable.
This may break interoperation between conforming and non-confirming contracts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Option premium calculation underprices options
### Description
The option premium is calculated using the input `period`, while the actual duration until the maturity date is rounded up to the end of the day which is typically longer than the given `period`. This allows traders to get longer option durations ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [06] Emission of identical values
### Description
Under the context of the above/preceding recommendation, `transferInRewards()` should also have its `emit` refactored below. Otherwise, you are practically emitting two identical values that defeat the purpose of contrasting the old and the values.
https://git... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Optimize array comparison
### Description
The following function is not well optimized. First of all, there's no need to check the array twice. This alone reduces the cost by half.
*1 instance*
- [SecurityCouncilMgmtUpgradeLib.sol#L52-L88](https://github.com/arbitrumfoundation/governance/blob/c18de53820c505f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: `setReserve()` can be front-run
### Description
_Submitted by palina_
#### Impact
The `reserve` address variable in NestedFactory.sol remains equal to 0 before the `setReserve()` function is called by an owner. This may lead to incorrect transfers of tokens or invalid comparison with e.g., the asset reserv... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Potential Underflow in `token0Total` due to Sentinel-Value Subtraction
### Description
Under normal operation, `token0Total` is always initialized to at least **1** so that proportional calculations work correctly. However, after a full `LimitOrderManager.kill()` of an epoch (which zeroes out all liquidity), `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Multiple ways for reentrancy in InfinityPoolsPeriphery through both swapForwarders could lead to loss of funds
### Description
In `InfinityPoolsPeriphery.infinityPoolPaymentCallback()`, when there is a swap of type `PaymentType.COLLATERAL_SWAP`, a user can specify one of the two `swapForwarders` in `src/perip... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Reentrancies can lead to misordered events
### Description
Several functions in the codebase do not use the checks-effects-interactions pattern, lack reentrancy guards, or emit events after interactions. These functions interact with external and third-party contracts that can execute callbacks and call the fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: $.pendingDecreaseCollateral variable will be updated incorrectly if the agent executes an insufficient response, leading to an imbalance in the strategy after unpausing
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Path:** src/strategy/BasisStrategy.sol#L946-L966, src/strategy/BasisStrategy.sol#L578-L590, src/str... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Improper randomness requests in `CardAllocationPool` and `SpinLottery`
### Description
According to [best practices](https://docs.chain.link/vrf/v2/security#dont-accept-bidsbetsinputs-after-you-have-made-a-randomness-request) outlined by Chainlink, **once a contract has submitted a randomness request, it sh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused logic related to the daily withdrawal threshold in `DIAStakingCommons`
### Description
The `setDailyWithdrawalThreshold()` function allows the owner to modify the daily withdrawal threshold but appears to serve no purpose in the current implementation. Dead code increases contract size, deployment costs... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Outdated Comments
### Description
**Update**
Addressed in: `7816f5c03e06c610ffdf2e1fc44f06595417f64f`.
**File(s) affected:**`ERC1155ItemsFactory.sol`, `ERC1155SaleFactory.sol`, `ERC20ItemsFactory.sol`, `ERC721ItemsFactory.sol`, `ERC721SaleFactory.sol`, `IERC1155ItemsFactory.sol`, `IERC1155SaleFactory.sol`, `I... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: String-Based Revert Messages Should Use Custom Errors
### Description
`MidasRedemptionVaultGateway` contract uses string-based revert messages in multiple places.
Since the contract uses Solidity ^0.8.23, which supports custom errors introduced in 0.8.4, these should be replaced with custom errors for gas eff... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Harvester Can Continuously Call `delegateToDelegator()` to Prevent User From `resolveDebt()`
### Description
**Update**
Fixed by the clients: Addressed in: `596d9629cf03181feaab9e26309006ac3e49922b`. The client provided the following explanation:
> 1. Introduce maxUnresolvedEpochs
> 2. Delegation will not b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Too many DSC tokens can get minted for fee-on-transfer tokens.
### Description
The `DSCEngine` contract overcalculates the collateral when operating with fee-on-transfer tokens, which can lead to too many `DSC` tokens being minted.
### Impact
When the contract operates with fee-on-transfer tokens as collat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Hardcoded Setting | false | false | ## Security Report
## Severity
**Medium Risk**
## Context
`SwapManagerUniV3.sol#L140-L149`
## Description
The protocol is using the same `TWAP_INTERVAL` for both `weth-morpho` and `weth-reward` token pools while their liquidity and activity might be different. It should use separate appropriate values for both pools... | Spearbit | 5 | Morpho |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: User can steal tokens by using duplicated ERC20 tokens as parameter in `NounsDAOLogicV1Fork.quit`
### Description
Calling [NounsDAOLogicV1Fork.quit](https://github.com/nounsDAO/nouns-monorepo/blob/718211e063d511eeda1084710f6a682955e80dcb/packages/nouns-contracts/contracts/governance/fork/newdao/governance/Nou... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Loss of Precision in _vestingSchedule function affects the distribution of OP Tokens
### Description
When the `release()` function is called, the amount of OP Tokens that have already vested is calculated by performing a call to the `_vestingSchedule()` function.
If `start <= timestamp <= end`, the `_vesti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: level call is not checked in claim()
### Description
In the claim() function, the success of the low-level call is not being verified. If the call fails, the factory will not receive the claimFee, and the fee will remain locked in the claim contract:
Consider checking the return value as shown below: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `SwingTraderManager.swingTraders()` shoudn't contain duplicate `traderContract`s.
### Description
If `SwingTraderManager.swingTraders()` contains duplicate `traderContract`s, several functions like `buyMalt()` and `sellMalt()` wouldn't work as expected as they work according to traders' balances.
### Proof... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | reentrancy | false | true | ## Severity: Medium Risk
### Context
- **Contracts:** `LSSVMPair.sol`, `LSSVMPairERC20.sol`
### Description
If the factory owner approves a malicious `_router`, it is possible for the malicious router to call functions like `swapTokenForAnyNFTs()` and set `is-Router` to true. Once that function reaches `router.pairTr... | Spearbit | 5 | Sudoswap |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: INACCURATE REWARD RATE CALCULATION
### Description
`AllocationVester.sol` contract calculates the reward unlock rate by dividing the total amount of tokens to be unlocked by the total vesting period (in seconds), which can go from eight weeks (4838400 seconds) to infinity. However, when the amount of tokens is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Config Can Be Initialized by Anyone
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `af99bcc5151df5324a8dce076a39ed640c0eef22`. The client provided the following explanation:
> A check was applied to guarantee the original Config admin is one of our wallets.
**File(s) affected:**`pr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Virtual pools detached from the corresponding `AlgebraPool` result in an inconsistent state
### Description
In cases where `AlgebraPool` connected to `VirtualAlgebraPool` catches a revert during a call to the `crossTo` function, the pool will reset its `activeIncentive` parameter to the 0 address here: https:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: DoS in `cancelNextBid()` due to insufficient `topBid` deposit
### Description
The current implementation only checks if `(topBid.deposit / topBid.rent) = K
320:>>> if (topBid.manager != address(0) && topBid.deposit / topBid.rent >> revert AmAmm__BidLocked();
322:>>> }
323:
324: // delete next bid from s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Debt could be relieved without repayment
### Description
**Description**
the 'repay' function increases a vault_sol_balance and decreases a borrowed_amount without receiving any payments
File: lending/programs/water/src/lib.rs: 614
**Recommendation**
add a Transfer function to get the payment from the borr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Lack of error transparency in delegatecall failures
### Description
The `_multicall` function in the **Multicallable** contract uses `delegatecall` to execute provided calldata. When the `delegatecall` fails, the function reverts without returning the error message or reason for the failure. This limits visibi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: `ComplianceServiceRegulated::getComplianceTransferableTokens` should call `IDSLockManager::getTransferableTokensForInvestor`
### Description
`ComplianceServiceRegulated::getComplianceTransferableTokens` already loads the registry and fetches the investor id, so therefore it should call `IDSLockManager::getTran... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `MuteBond`'s `epoch()` and `currentEpoch()` are the same
### Description
Gas saved: a few units per tx
`epoch()` and `currentEpoch()` are basically the same, each public/external function adds a conditional check for each tx (since the contract compares the call data against the function has to find the right... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | other | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-union-judging/issues/24
## Found by
hyh
## Summary
Withdraw sequence entry is being deleted in AssetManager's removeAdapter() using incorrect index, so the sequence array becomes corrupted and withdrawals can end up unavailable.
## Vulnerability Detail
`index` us... | Sherlock | 5 | Union Finance Update |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Governor’s veto protection can be exploited
### Description
## Handle
cmichel
## Vulnerability details
The `GovernorAlpha`'s council cannot veto proposals that perform a call to the contract itself.
This can be exploited by malicious proposal creators by appending a new call at the end of their proposal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: (HAL-06) Anyone Can Burn SHToken From Other Users
### Description
The `burn()` function in the `SHToken` contract lacks proper access control, allowing any external user to call it and burn tokens from any account. This vulnerability can be exploited by malicious actors to arbitrarily reduce the token balance... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Precision loss in `withdraw(...)` can lead to all `asdUDSC` being burned while not all `USDC` is withdrawn
### Description
See [`withdraw`(…)](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-canto/blob/1516028017a34ccfb4b0b19f5c5f17f5fa4cad42/contracts/asd/asdUSDC.sol# L52-L66) method:
The `asdUDSC` token has 18 decim... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: MANDATORY CHECKS FOR EXTRA SAFETY IN THE SETTERS
### Description
In the folowing functions below, there are some checks that can be made in order to achieve more safe and efficient code.
Address zero check can be added in the function offer, `RubiconMarket` contract to ensure the address owner and recipient a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary Casting Of Fee Rate
### Description
## Compute Swap Step Function Issue
In the `compute_swap_step` function, the `fee_rate` variable of type `u64` is unnecessarily casted to `u64`:
## Remediation
The `as u64` part can be removed:
## Patch
Fixed in commit `f6a3888`.
### Recommendation
The `a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Variable names that consist of all capital letters should be reserved for `constant`/`immutable` variables
### Description
If the variable needs to be different based on which class it comes from, a `view`/`pure` *function* should be used instead (e.g. like [this](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Convex extra reward tokens are not handled
### Description
The `claimCVXReward` method makes a call to `getReward` from the Convex reward pool contract. The `getReward` method actually can possibly send other token rewards to the caller as well, but those are not handled in the `Capsule` contract as only `CRV`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: claim rate is non-continuous
### Description
The `getClaimRateBps` function is non-continuous in both `(claimRate, gasSecondsToConsume)` return parameters. It jumps at `baseGasSeconds` from `(zeroClaimRate, 0)` to `(baseClaimRate, gasSecondsToConsume)`. This can lead to strange user claim incentives:
Dependin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: cancelPromotion is too rigorous
### Description
_Submitted by gpersoon, also found by 0x0x0x, gzeon, harleythedog, hubble, and kenzo_
#### Impact
When you cancel a promotion with `cancelPromotion()` then the promotion is complete deleted.
This means no-one can claim any rewards anymore, because `\_promotio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: && in Require Functions
### Description
If not opting to use custom errors and If optimising for running costs over deployment costs you can seperate && in require functions into 2 parts. I ran a basic test in remix and it cost an extra 234 gas to deploy but will save ~9 gas everytime the require function... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing input validation on timeout
### Description
## Handle
0xRajeev
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Factory constructor sets timeout to 86400 seconds but setter setTimeout() has no threshold checks for a min timeout value. If this is accidentally set to 0 or lower-than-safe value then there is no di... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Owner can steal funds from any user by abusing `setRecipientFor()` or `platformFee`
### Description
The owner has the ability to steal all bounty rewards from users. This can be accomplished in either of two ways:
1. The owner has access to a function called `setRecipientFor()`, which allows them to set the r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [08] Prolonged process due to updatable state
### Description
The introduction of [`updatePeriodEndBlock`](https://github.com/nounsDAO/nouns-monorepo/blob/718211e063d511eeda1084710f6a682955e80dcb/packages/nouns-contracts/contracts/governance/NounsDAOV3Proposals.sol#L67) in V3 compared to the V1/V2 could unnece... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Lack of timelock enables reward sniping
### Description
First see:
As seen, yhe WstUSF contract allows users to deposit and withdraw within the same block without any timelock mechanism. This atomic interaction capability creates an attack vector where sophisticated users can frontrun reward distributions fr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Avoid repeated comparison with `msg.sender` when looping in `SiloFacet:transferDeposits`
### Description
Currently, `SiloFacet:transferDeposits` performs the same comparison every loop iteration, but this can be done just once outside the for loop:
Alternatively, the logic can be divided into two separate fo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: [02] `DAO.execute` FUNCTION DOES NOT CHECK IF `_actions[i].to` HAS ANY CONTRACT CODE WHEN `_actions[i].data` IS NOT EMPTY
### Description
It is a popular practice for a protocol to deploy its token using the same deployer contract address and the same nonce so the addresses of such token are the same on differ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Rogue validators can manipulate funding rates and profit unfairly from liquidations
### Description
Validators are given the exclusive privilege to match. Any validator can abuse this privilege to manipulate funding rates and profit unfairly from liquidations. Normally validators are fully trusted but in the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: Core System Can Be Disabled
### Description
The [`CoreSystem`](https://github.com/latticexyz/mud/blob/12a9eb1afb18a7f7cb43d774cabb2d5af7c74e6b/packages/world/src/modules/core/CoreSystem.sol#L18) contract is [registered in the `ROOT_NAMESPACE`](https://github.com/latticexyz/mud/blob/12a9eb1afb18a7f7cb43d774cab... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: No way for users to invalidate nonce used to sign
### Description
After signing a transaction, users may change their mind and wish to invalidate their signature. In this case users should have a function to call that invalidates their nonce.
In places such as `SecuritizeSwap::executePreApprovedTransaction`, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Cannot deposit to BathToken if token is Deflationary Token (BathHouse.sol)
### Description
_Submitted by PP1004, also found by unforgiven, GimelSec, and camden_
Function `openBathTokenSpawnAndSignal` will alway revert when `newBathTokenUnderlying` or `desiredPairedAsset` is deflationary token
### Proof of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: OmnichainStaking.sol:unstakeLP and OmnichainStaking.sol:unstakeToken allows anyone to unstake any token provided they own enough ZEROvp
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/zerolend/governance
Impacts:
- Direct theft of any user NFTs, whether at-rest or in-motion, other th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: In the beginning its relatively easy to gain majority share
### Description
_Submitted by gpersoon_
When the DAO is just deployed it is relatively easy to gain a large (majority) share, by depositing a lot in the `DAOVault` and/of `BONDVault`. Then you could submit a proposal and vote it in. Luckily there ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Lack of disableinitializers in upgradeable contracts
### Description
In the context of upgradeable smart contracts using OpenZeppelin's upgradeable patterns, it's crucial to ensure that initializers cannot be re-invoked after deployment, to prevent unauthorized or unintended re-initialization which could lead ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: SwapManager Configurations Cannot be Updated or Removed
### Description
The `SwapManager` contract does not allow updating or removing existing configurations for collateral assets, creating significant inflexibility in maintaining the protocol. If a security vulnerability is discovered in a swapper contrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Contracts can be re-deployed in `rUSDY` factory
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-ondo/blob/main/contracts/usdy/rUSDYFactory.sol#L75
The `rUSDY` contract can be redeployed by the guardian by calling `deployrUSDY()` in the `rUSDYFactory` contract. This will deploy a new set of contracts and... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Severity
**Impact:** Medium
**Likelihood:** Medium
## Description
Though the `ClaveImplementation.initialize` function can proceed an initial call with arbitrary `value`, the `payable` modifier is missed both in the `initialize` and in the `AccountFactory.deployAccount` functions. The `deployAccount` function al... | Pashov Audit Group | 3 | Clave_2024-11-02 |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: veRaac Token Constraint MAX_TOTAL_SUPPLY Can Be Bypassed. Vulnerability Disrupts Protocol Functionality and Undermines Governance Quorum.
### Description
The `veRAACToken` contract includes functionalities to lock, unlock, increase, withdraw, and extend both the locked amount and duration of RAAC tokens. Th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Node runner who is already known to be malicious cannot be banned before corresponding smart wallet is created
### Description
Currently, the `rotateNodeRunnerOfSmartWallet` function provides the only way to set `bannedNodeRunners` to `true` for a malicious node runner. However, before the node runner calls... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Roles not set in `deposit-registry` contract constructors
### Description
Roles in contracts that belong to the `issuance` contracts are being initialized in the constructors and contain proper functions to update the address for this roles (revoke and grant):
```solidity
constructor(
string memory _n... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: `withdrawAssets` will always revert
### Description
While the contract is not expected to receive any assets, the `withdrawAssets` function is provided to allow the admin to withdraw any assets that the contract may have received, presumable by mistake.
`withdrawAssets` uses the `fromStage` modifier to ens... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | USDC | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-10-rage-trade-judging/issues/55
## Found by
0x52
## Summary
WithdrawPeriphery allows the user to redeem junior share vaults to any token available on GMX, applying a fixed slippage threshold to all redeems. The slippage calculation always returns the number of tokens ... | Sherlock | 4 | Rage Trade |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Most state-changing methods do not emit events
### Description
Examples for this are `setDepositsActive` or `setCouncilAddress` - state-changing methods should emit events so that off-chain monitoring can be implemented. Make sure to emit a proper event in each state-changing method to follow best practices. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | false | false | ## Low: A flash loan fee sandwich attack
### Description
https://github.com/cryptoalgebra/Algebra/blob/6c22b64977e0b0266aec89470480df74977eb606/src/core/contracts/AlgebraPool.sol#L328
The flash loan fee is spread among current active liquidity providers. A malicious actor can get a flash loan transaction from the memp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: CoreControlled allows many calls on behalf of users in the Gateway
### Description
The use of `CoreControlled` allows for many calls on behalf of users. `GOVERNANCE` may call each of the following with arbitrary arguments:
- `usdc.transferFrom`
- `iusd.transferFrom`
- `liusd.transferFrom`
- `LockingController... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Wrong reward token calculation in MasterChef contract
### Description
_Submitted by throttle, also found by cccz, cmichel, and leastwood_
[MasterChef.sol#L86](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-concur/blob/main/contracts/MasterChef.sol#L86)
When adding new token pool for staking in MasterChef contract
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | dos | true | false |
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2025-05-blackhole/blob/92fff849d3b266e609e6d63478c4164d9f608e91/contracts/BlackGovernor.sol# L52>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2025-05-blackhole/blob/92fff849d3b266e609e6d63478c4164d9f608e91/contracts/BlackGovernor.sol# L91>
### Finding description
* **Severity**: Medium
* **Affect... | Code4rena | 4 | Audit 507 |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Single-step process for critical ownership transfer
### Description
If the nominated `newAdmin` or `newOwner` account is not a valid account, the owner or admin risks locking themselves out.
```solidity
function setAdmin(address newAdmin) public onlyAdmin {
admin = newAdmin;
emit SetAdmin(newAdmin);
}
fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Hash shouldn't be re-calculated on every iteration of the `for`-loop
### Description
Calculate the hash outside of the loop, and use that value within the loop
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/rabbitholegg/quest-protocol/blob/8c4c1f71221570b14a0479c216583342bd652d8d/contracts/RabbitHo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Possible Revert Due to Improper Values
### Description
## Token Calculations Issue
In `available_to_borrow` and `collateral_value_to_sell`, the calculations for scale have the potential to revert under specific conditions related to token decimals.
## Remediation
Check the token decimal values to ensure the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [06] Duplicate import statement for `AgentFactoryV3.sol` in `FGenesis.sol`
### Description
In `FGenesis.sol`, the module `AgentFactoryV3.sol` is imported twice at the top of the file:
This duplication is unnecessary and could lead to confusion for maintainers or reviewers. While it does not directly impact c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: WITHDRAWAL COULD GET STUCK IF THERE ARE NO MORE UNBONDINGS
### Description
If users unbond before the epoch period using the `execute_unbond` or `execute_unbond_stsei` functions in the **krp-staking-contracts/basset\_sei\_hub** contract, they won't be able to withdraw their tokens later unless someone else unb... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing Controller Functions in GaugeController
### Description
Certain functions in the BaseGauge contract—namely `setEmission`, `updatePeriod`, `setInitialWeight`, and `setBoostParameters`—are designed to be callable only by the controller (i.e., the GaugeController). However, these functions are not impleme... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: TRST-H-2 Users can drain Gelato deposit at little cost
### Description
**Description:**
In Console automation, fees are collected via the `claimExecutionFees()` modifier:
**Impact:**
The actual strategy processing happens in _; , then the total fee is calculated using the gas used up to this point.
T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unclear as to the rewards for staking.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
Using the' stake () function, a user can stake any amount for any period. A fee is charged for the specified amount during the staking process. Further, the user can withdraw the amount af... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Genesis State Validation
### Description
## Importing Genesis State
In the genesis, the code does not check for duplicates before importing an account within `ImportState`. If `ImportState` is called with a `genesisState` that contains duplicate accounts (i.e., accounts with the same account number or... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Could make code more efficient
### Description
**Description**
In ReentrancyGuardInitializable.sol, on lines 35 & 36, the private variables _NOT_ENTERED &
_ENTERED could be declared as boolean types instead of unit256:
uint256 private constant _NOT_ENTERED = 1;
uint256 private constant _ENTERED = 2;
**Recomm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Excess `msg.value` Can Be Stuck In The `Executor.sol` Contract
### Description
The `swap()` function is payable, which means it can allow native tokens.
```solidity
function swap(
IExecutor executor,
RouteDescription calldata desc,
Interaction[] calldata interactions
) external payable returns (uint2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing `_isInitialized(msg.sender)` check in `K1Validator.transferOwnership()`
### Description
`K1Validator.transferOwnership()` does not check if the module is initialized for a smart account.
### Impact
Smart accounts can be locked out of using the `K1Validator` module permanently. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: No Check for Transferring to Self
### Description
The `_transfer` function is responsible for transferring the ownership of a lock from one address to another. It is a critical part of the ERC721 token standard implementation, which this contract adheres to. However, there is a missing check to ensure that the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The `dateRemoved` field of a removed DKIM key can be reset
### Description
The `removeDKIMKey` method in `DKIMRecoverySigValidator` does not check if the given key has already been removed. The `authorizedToRevoke` account can call the method for the same key as many times as he wants, which will reset the `da... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect chainId of Base in deploy script will force redeployment
### Description
Incorrect chainId of Base in deploy parameters results in incorrect deploy and subsequent redeployment.
### Proof of Concept
Contract ChainIds.sol is responsible for mapping `chainId -> wormholeChainId` which is used in con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of player verification in `earlyEndGame` function
### Description
The `earlyEndGame` function currently does not verify whether a player is actually part of the game before proceeding with updates to the game state and player's balance. This lack of verification could potentially allow incorrect updates i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [02] Lack of method to remove derivatives
### Description
In case a derivative gets added by mistake or with incorrect parameters, currently this derivative would remain stuck in `SafEth.sol`.
### Recommendation
Consider adding a method that allows removing derivatives from `SafEth.sol`.
### Recommendation
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Uniswap Formula Drastically Underestimates Volatilty
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-10-aloe-judging/issues/38
## Found by
Bandit
The implied volatility calculated fees over a time period divided by current liquidity will almost always be lower than a reasonable derivation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | logic-error | true | false | ## Medium: In `Operator._transfer()`, `onDelegate()` should be called after updating the token balances
### Description
In `_transfer()`, `onDelegate()` is called to validate the owner's `minimumSelfDelegationFraction` requirement.
```solidity
File: contracts\OperatorTokenomics\Operator.sol
324: // transfer c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Constructor of `Escrow` should make sure that `buyer`, `seller`, `arbiter` are different from each other.
### Description
- As arbiter should be impartial, when buyer or seller is same with arbiter, there would be unfair arbitration.
- Buyer and seller might be same in case malicious buyer/seller might want to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistency in Prime Number Calculation
### Description
## Vulnerability in `find_next_prime` Function
The vulnerability arises from the way the `find_next_prime` adjusts `n` to find the next prime number greater than `n`. All prime numbers greater than three are either of the form `6k + 1` or `6k + 5`. In ... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.