prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | true | false | ## High: Too many rewards are distributed when a draw is closed
### Description
A relayer completes a prize pool draw by calling `rngComplete` in `RngRelayAuction.sol`. This method closes the prize pool draw with the relayed random number and distributes the rewards to the RNG auction recipient and the RNG relay aucti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Missing Mac Allows for Cipher Text Malleability
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `6b8862152ec0fe2270b65281d264706d058bfe61`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Add HMAC authentication to prevent data tampering in encrypted storage
**Update**
Furtherm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Potential ERC20 Transfer Failures and Incompatibility
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> Currently, the contract is only used for transferring NMT tokens, so there are no compatibility issues. If support for other tokens is added in the futur... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Inconsistency in the MaxCursor Definition and Overflow
### Description
In the current implementation, there is a possible overflow scenario when representing the maximum possible cursor value as a string. The `MaxCursor` is the largest possible cursor. However, calling `MaxCursor.String` results in an overf... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Pools are incompatible with non-standard ERC20 tokens
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:**
Medium, as it limits the possible pools in the app and with some special ones can result in loss of funds
**Likelihood:**
Medium, as some of the tokens are not uncommon, like `USDT`
**Description**
The Solidly... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Non existing states are considered active
### Description
The function `closePartOfQuestPeriod()` verifies if the state of `periodsByQuest[questIDs[i]][period]` is active. However, if a state is checked of a non-existing `questIDs[i]` or a `questID` that has no quest in that period, then `periodsByQuest[questI... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: We recommend moving the functions to a separate library
### Description
In smart contract https://github.com/iearn-finance/yoracle.link/blob/faf1309cbe7a05f70b338351315039eb8e5b9c09/contracts/Keep3rV1Oracle.sol#L751 there is the `sqrt` function and in smart contracts
https://github.com/iearn-finance/yoracle.li... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `StrategyPassiveManagerUniswap::withdraw` should call `_setTicks` before calling `_addLiquidity`
### Description
**Description:** When a withdraw is initiated, `BeefyVaultConcLiq::withdraw` [calls](https://github.com/beefyfinance/experiments/blob/14a313b76888581b05d42b6f7b6097c79f3e65c6/contracts/protocol/conc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Open Redirect Inside Email Verification
### Description
An `EmailVerifyBegin` operation containing a malicious URL with the domain `` may cause an open redirect vulnerability. Since no validation is performed on the domain, this URL is loaded directly when the email is opened, leading to an open redirect vuln... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Front-running attacks on finalize could affect received token amounts
### Description
The `returnFunds()` function (called by `finalize()`) withdraws the entire holdings in the Balancer pool but does not allow the caller to specify and enforce the minimum amount of received tokens. Without such a check, the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Strategy cannot be added after removal in AdminOperationalTreasury
### Description
Admin Can not add already removed strategy, because
`addStrategy` function calls `connect` in strategy but it will revert since can be called once:
`
`connect` function in `AdminStrategy` contract can be called only once: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect margin calculation in liquidationType2
### Description
In liquidation type2, we will calculate the margin via `amount * EthPrice`. We don't consider the exchange fee in synthetix.
### Impact
The liquidation transaction will be reverted for liquidation type2. We need to make sure the liquidation s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Swap Signer fails if final owner is invalid due to off by one error in loop
### Description
New users attempting to call `claimSigner()` when there is already a full slate of owners are supposed to kick any invalid owners off the safe in order to swap in and take their place. However, the loop that checks t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use of single step ownership transfer
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
The multiple contracts in the protocol use the `OwnableUpgradeable` contract which allows changing the owner address. However, this contract does not implement a 2-step-process for transferring ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: PasskeyValidator vulnerable to signature malleability
### Description
Since `PasskeyValidator` verifies an ECDSA signature, N-s (N being the curve order) is also valid as a signature. Ethereum rejects signatures for the higher s for secp256k1 in `ecrecover`. Accepting the higher s shouldn't pose a security ris... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: `TokenBridge::bridgeToken` allows 1-way `ERC721` bridging causing users to permanently lose their nfts
### Description
**Description:** `TokenBridge::bridgeToken` is only intended to support `ERC20` tokens however it quite happily accepts `ERC721` tokens and is able to successfully bridge them over to the L2.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Different Pragma Directives Are Used
### Description
In order to clearly identify the Solidity version with which the contracts will be compiled, pragma directives should be fixed and consistent across file imports.
Throughout the codebase, multiple instances of varying pragma directives were identified:
* `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Payout distributions to Remora token holders are diluted by initial token owner mint
### Description
`RemoraToken::initialize` takes a parameter `_initialSupply` and mints this to `tokenOwner`:
```solidity
_mint(tokenOwner, _initialSupply * 10 ** decimals());
```
`DividendManager::distributePayout` records... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: A signer can't cancel his signature before a deadline.
### Description
After signing a signature, a signer might want to cancel it for some reason. While checking other protocols, a signer can cancel by increasing his nonce.
In this protocol, we inherit from OpenZeppelin's [Nonces](https://github.com/OpenZe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Super Pool shares can be inflated by bad debt leading to overflows
### Description
Super Pool shares can be inflated by bad debt leading to overflows.
### Impact
Shares are inflated by bad debts, the more volatile an asset is, the more likely bad debt occurs. Small bad debt may not be a problem because the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: EtherToken/MarketToken owners can drain ether from users
### Description
The owner of the EtherToken and MarketToken contracts have the power to initialize their accounts with any number of tokens and then withdraw them. The EtherToken contract is initialized with an address and some arbitrary number of token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Loan can be written off by anybody before overdue delay expires
### Description
When a borrower takes a second loan after a loan that has been written off, this second loan can be written off instantly by any other member due to missing update of last repay block, leaving the staker at a loss.
### Impact
The... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: 9] Withdrawal queue priority bypass for feeless instant withdrawal
### Description
**Severity:** High
**Description:** When a `Withdrawal` is created, it references the `cumulativeAmountToken1ClaimableLPWithdrawalCheckpoint` pointer to track when a claim is allowed, according to the existing withdrawal queue... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: [FIXED] Underflow in case of `depositedValue` is lower than `MINIMUM_LIQUIDITY` on the first deposit to the strategy in `ZunamiPool`
### Description
In the `processSuccessfulDeposit` function of the `ZunamiPool` contract, there is a risk of underflow if `depositedValue` is less than `MINIMUM_LIQUIDITY` during ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | initialization | true | true |
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/main/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowDelegation.sol#L79><br>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/main/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowDelegation.sol#L213><br>
The contract is accidently editing both the previous and current checkpoint when changing/remo... | Code4rena | 5 | Golom |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack of Consistency and Misleading Naming in Checks
### Description
**Severity**
Low Risk
**Description**
There is a different check implementation in `onlyIfAlreadyClaimed` and `onlyIfAlreadyClaimedMultiple` modifiers for the same check. Additionally, both modifier names ensure that the execution will reve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | token | true | true | ## Medium: User rewards may remain unclaimed after calling `InfraredBGTIsolationModeTokenVaultV1::exit()` function
### Description
When a user calls `InfraredBGTIsolationModeTokenVaultV1::exit` in a scenario where rewards are in the same token (iBGT), the function correctly unstakes their original deposit but:
- The ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect event argument
### Description
**Description**
At contracts/Cohort.sol:228
The _amount is decreasing at lines
contracts/Cohort.sol:222
contracts/Cohort.sol:225
contracts/Cohort.sol:213
So the wrong value will be displayed in the event.
**Recommendation**:
Store total _amount in the other value ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Missing oracle data staleness check
### Description
In the `ReserveAutomation` contract, the `getPriceAndDecimals()` function checks that the returned price is positive and that the round is valid, using `answeredInRound >= roundId` and `updatedAt != 0`, but it does not check that the price data is recent. In ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Avoid wrapping sqrt function in unchecked block
### Description
The `sqrt` function in the Math.sol library calculates the square roots of an input number using the Babylonian method. The code is forked from Uniswap's v2 and is wrapped inside an unchecked block. The implementation looks safe for extreme values... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: TRST-L-2 Rounding error causes an additional iteration of DCA strategies
### Description
**Description:**
Both CoW strategies receive an interval and total amountIn of tokens to swap. They calculate the amount per iteration as below:
**Impact:**
There is a precision loss error in the amountIn calculation. It... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Multiple Methods Does Not Follow The `Checks-Effects-Interactions` Pattern
### Description
The `stake()`, `forceUnstakeAll()`, `buyPortalEnergy()` and `burnPortalEnergyToken()` functions do not follow the `Checks-Effects-Interactions (CEI)` pattern. It is recommended to always first change the state before doi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Freeze Bridge via Non-UTF8 Token Name/Symbol/Denom
### Description
_Submitted by nascent_
Manual insertion of non-utf8 characters in a token name will break parsing of logs and will always result in the oracle getting in a loop of failing and early returning an error. The fix is non-trivial and likely requir... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: OnlyEOAPolicy Allows Non-Consumer-Specific Contract Accounts
### Description
The `OnlyEOAPolicy` not only allows EOAs to interact with a protected function on the consumer, any contract account can also be added to the [`allowedContracts`](https://github.com/ironblocks/onchain-firewall/blob/8f4fcf861d53c835... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of minimum sample size requirement for official price calculation
### Description
To obtain the official price for an asset, Compound’s Open Oracle takes all reported price data from trusted sources, calculates a median price using the [`medianPrice` function](https://github.com/compound-finance/open-o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect `SmartVaultV4` function arguments should be renamed
### Description
**Description:** The following functions in `SmartVaultV4` take an argument `_USDCTargetAmount`:
* `calculateAmountIn()`
* `swapCollateral()`
* `autoRedemption()`
However, this is semantically incorrect as it is intended to represen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Add function to remove whitelisted token and NFT
### Description
In the Voter contract, the governor can only add tokens and NFTs to the whitelist array. However, it is missing the functionality to remove whitelisted tokens and NFTs. If any whitelisted token or NFT has an issue, it cannot be removed from the l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: allowInitializePath could return true as all paths are intialized post deployment
### Description
The `allowInitializePath` function in the OmniXMultisender contract indicates to LayerZero that the deployment contract can receive inbound messages from a specific destination chain. This serves as an additional ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Prefer`Ownable2Step` instead of `Ownable`
### Description
Prefer [Ownable2Step](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/master/contracts/access/Ownable2Step.sol) instead of `Ownable` for [safer ownership transfer](https://www.rareskills.io/post/openzeppelin-ownable2step). | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Activate the optimizer
### Description
Before deploying your contract, activate the optimizer when compiling using `solc --optimize --bin sourceFile.sol`. By default, the optimizer will optimize the contract assuming it is called 200 times across its lifetime. If you want the initial contract deployment to be ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: TON supply amount is locked when the gas check fails
### Description
When a user supplies TON to the protocol, the supply amount can become permanently locked in the contract if the gas check fails. This occurs because the code reserves the supply amount before performing the gas check, preventing the refun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect error message
### Description
**Description**
the code is checking for the 'whitelisted.whitelisted but the error thrown is Invalid BorrowAmount`
File: lending/programs/water/src/lib.rs: 628
**Recommendation**
make sure the thrown errors are correct
**Re-audit comment**
Resolved | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: currentTokenSupply() can be gamed risk-free to manipulate either side of votes in certain assets
### Description
`currentTotalSupply` is being used at the following places to check if various thresholds are reached:
### Recommendation
- Avoid using `currentTotalSupply` where it can be skewed.
- If token su... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: Add a timelock to critical functions
### Description
It is a good practice to give time for users to react and adjust to critical changes. A timelock provides more guarantees and reduces the level of trust required, thus decreasing risk for users. It also indicates that the project is legitimate (less risk of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Fee Abuse in Integrated Contract Actions
### Description
This issue has been identified within the [cancelWithdraw](https://github.com/Se7en-Seas/cMETH-boring-vault/blob/d6e2d18f45a3e05d749d34966139fc85fc47f7e6/src/base/Roles/DelayedWithdraw.sol#525) and [requestWithdraw](https://github.com/Se7en-Seas/cMETH... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: `_writeCheckpoint` does not write to storage on same block
### Description
[VoteEscrowDelegation.sol#L101-L108](https://github.com/golom-protocol/contracts/blob/4e84d5c2115d163ca54a1729da46164e8cf4df6d/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowDelegation.sol#L101-L108)
In `VoteEscrowDelegation._writeCheckpoint`, when ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessarily Delayed Error Handling
### Description
When depositing ERC-20 tokens, the `L1ERC20Bridge` contract [queries the token’s metadata](https://github.com/matter-labs/zksync-2-contracts/blob/9f3c6944e6320166edd96ef6586a9dd4548a27f2/ethereum/contracts/bridge/L1ERC20Bridge.sol#L170-L175), and [sends the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Natspec documentation
### Description
The Natspec documentation for the `initialize()` function is incorrect, as it refers to the `initialize()` function of the `IonStrategy` contract.
### Recommendation
Update the Natspec documentation for the `initialize()` function in the `PendleStrategy` contrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Missing minimum token amounts in the emergency contract functions allows MEV bots to take advantage of the protocols emergency situation
### Description
When an emergency situation arises and the protocol pauses or resumes the operation of the vault. All funds of the vault are removed from GMX or added back... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Ownership Can Be Renounced
### Description
**Update**
Addressed in: `5937e483764c35a38f4ccaa86369a298f47ae486`. The client provided the following explanation:
> The Ownable library has been removed in favour of the AccessControl library, which allows for having multiple addresses for a single role.
The `Owna... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: protocolFeeAddress could still be 0 if not configured yet
### Description
In theory, `protocolFeeAddress` could still be 0 if not configured yet. In that case, the tokens would be lost.
### Recommendation
Consider checking for the value of 0. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Access mappings directly rather than using accessor functions
### Description
Saves having to do two JUMP instructions, along with stack setup
*There are 5 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-cally/blob/1849f9ee12434038aa80753266ce6a2f2b082c59/contracts/src/Cally.sol | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Missing freshness check on oracle data in `Staking.totalControlled()` enables stale-rate arbitrage
### Description
`Staking.totalControlled()` derives the mETH/ETH exchange rate inputs from `oracle.latestRecord()` without validating the record timestamp.
If the oracle lags significant state changes (e.g., ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: OracleManager performance update may revert due to unbounded loops
### Description
The `generatePerformance()` function contains 4 nested loops with unbounded iterations over validators and oracles. Since there are no caps on the number of validators that can be added by `ValidatorManager` or oracles that can ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `claimAndDistributeAlgebraPoolFees()` may revert on zero transfer failure
### Description
_Resolved_
In the `Voter` contract, the `_claimAndDistributeAlgebraPoolFees()` function is invoked during `_distribute()` for Algebra gauges. It performs the following:
1. Collects and withdraws accumulated fees (`token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [07] Notice - Slippage and Interest Free Loan for Arbitrageurs
### Description
Because `redeem` doesn't burn FEI, any caller can `mint` and `redeem` multiple times in the same tx with the goal of arbing out the FEI - DAI pair.
[SimpleFeiDaiPSM.sol#L105-L106](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-tribe/blob/76... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: `tryMigrate()` doesn't ensure that `followerProfileId` isn't already following
### Description
In `FollowNFT.sol`, the `tryMigrate()` function is used to migrate users who were following before the V2 upgrade. It does so by updating `_followTokenIdByFollowerProfileId` and `_followDataByFollowTokenId`, which... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Optimize names to save gas
### Description
`public`/`external` function names and `public` member variable names can be optimized to save gas. See [this](https://gist.github.com/IllIllI000/a5d8b486a8259f9f77891a919febd1a9) link for an example of how it works. Below are the interfaces/abstract contracts that ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Potential Gas Problem in validateAndUpdateDataFeedsValues().
### Description
**Description: **
Transaction Failures: Transactions calling the validateAndUpdateDataFeedsValues() function may fail due to insufficient gas, causing potential disruption to the contract's operation.
The validateAndUpdateDataFeedsV... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: L01] Not following the Check-Effects-Interaction Pattern
### Description
###### Low
[Solidity recommends the usage of the Check-Effects-Interaction Pattern](https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-considerations.html#use-the-checks-effects-interactions-pattern) to avoid potential security vulnerab... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Incorrect blacklisting of unsafe calls
### Description
According to the current design, the users of `Rubic` perform the ERC20 `approve` to the `ERC20Proxy` contract, allowing the ERC20 [tokens to be spent without further confirmations](https://github.com/Cryptorubic/multi-proxy-rubic/blob/8843336c50ca43e5b5b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Enhance Consistency by Adding Deadlines to liquidityOffer in Line with rollOffer Require- ments
### Description
When a provider makes a `liquidityOffer`, there is no deadline for the offer. However, when they make a `rollOffer`, a deadline is required. Adding a deadline can be a useful feature compared to offe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: `validateTransaction` method reverts due to an invalid `validator` address
### Description
An invalid `validator` address parameter can cause a revert in the `ClaveImplementation.validateTransaction` function instead of returning `bytes4(0)` on an incorrect signature because of `validAddress` modifier in the `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: Custom Selectors could facilitate proxy selector clashing attack
### Description
ink! has a feature that allows developers to hardcode the selector for a given function. This capability enables function name-changing while maintaining the same selector and also facilitates the creation of language-agnostic co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Third-Party Invocation of Claiming Functions May Lead to Unintended Consequences for Beneficiary
### Description
**Update**
This was resolved in commit `2c06b09e5af4f3ad621af0addd00db169601b670` by adding the `onlyAuthorizedClaimer()` modifier to the `claim()` and `claimAndStake()` functions. The modifier ensu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Different spot prices used during the comparison
### Description
The spot prices used during the comparison are different, which might result in the trade proceeding even if the pool is manipulated, leading to a loss of assets.
### Impact
If the spot price is incorrect, it might potentially fail to detect th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Non-Functional HandleBridgeExecuted Function
### Description
The `HandleBridgeExecuted` function within the `MasterSpotter` contract is intended to handle events related to the execution of bridge operations. However, upon inspection, it is observed that the function merely decodes the event parameters without... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: UNDEFINED VARIABLES ARE USED
### Description
The `Lord.sol`, `Mead.sol` and `ImportExportElasticNft.sol` smart contracts use undefined variables, resulting in contracts which do not compile.
Code Location
-------------
* `limitSupply` (Lord.sol#93)
* `bridgeAllowed` (Mead.sol#36,46)
* `amount` (Mead.sol#73)
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Any account can mint infinite amount of $GORPLES tokens to any compatible vault
### Description
The `mint_gorples` instruction in the `gorples_core` program allows any account that meets the `config.contracts` constraint to mint tokens. **This is due to the absence of a signer check for the** `mint_authority`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: SequencerFeeVault l1FeeWallet() function misleading on Base
### Description
The Sequencer Fee Vault implements a `l1FeeWallet()` function, which returns the `RECIPIENT` address:
```solidity
function l1FeeWallet() public view returns (address) {
return RECIPIENT;
}
```
This function name assumes that the fe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Document why unchecked usage is safe
### Description
The contract uses unchecked arithmetic to save on gas. There are comments specifying why it's safe to perform an unchecked math operation for certain unchecked blocks, but not for all of them:
- **Lines 202, 236**: Unchecked addition here is safe as the sum ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Use `ReentrancyGuardTransient` instead of `ReentrancyGuard` or more gas-efficient `nonReentrant` modifiers
### Description
Use [`ReentrancyGuardTransient`](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/master/contracts/utils/ReentrancyGuardTransient.sol) instead of `ReentrancyGuard` for more gas-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of variable initialization
### Description
The `unstake` function of the **fund** contract allows to unstake and withdraw previously staked tokens.
However, the call to `withdraw`which is inside the `unstake` functiondoes not work the first time it is executed since the variable `time2fullredemption`u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `MarketOrder` minimum lifetime can be easily bypassed
### Description
**Description:** `OrderBranch::createMarketOrder` validates the `marketOrderMinLifetime` of the previous pending market order before canceling it and opening a new market order:
But in `OrderBranch::cancelMarketOrder` users can cancel the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Logic Flaw in `verify()` Function in `ChainlinkLightClient.sol` Contract
### Description
The goal of this function is to validate the receipt of the query. There are two scenarios depending on if the `account.storageRoot` is stored in the `approvedStorageRoots` mapping:
1. When it is stored, the account proo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: SAME PAIR OF TOKENS CAN BE USED
### Description
It is observed that in `forward()` and `swapAndSend()` functions inside `ReceivingForwarder.sol` and in `CrosschainForwarder.sol` does not check if source token type equals to destination token type and accepts same pair of tokens as input.
This type of bugs may... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [01] Admin is a single point of failure
### Description
Multiple instances in code where the admin logic could lead to a brick in normal functionality.
For example take a look [here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-acala/blob/9c71c05cf2d9f0a2603984c50f76fc8a315d4d65/src/modules/incentives/src/lib.rs#L83... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: GoNameStartsWithPackageName
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description:**
Some names start with the package name, which is not recommended.
**Files**:
app/ante/evm/interfaces.go: 19
precompiles/vesting/types.go: 27
rpc/backend/backend.go: 27
x/wasm/alias.go: 24, 96, 211
**R... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Incompatibility With Rebasing/Deflationary/Inflationary tokens
### Description
_Submitted by defsec_
The Strategy contracts do not appear to support rebasing/deflationary/inflationary tokens whose balance changes during transfers or over time. The necessary checks include at least verifying the amount of t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [03] Simplifying yield fee distribution through direct transfers
### Description
Adopting a direct transfer approach via [`_withdraw()`](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-pooltogether/blob/main/pt-v5-vault/src/PrizeVault.sol#L939) for handling `_yieldFee` payments to the `_yieldFeeRecipient`, as opposed to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Missing `nonReentrant` modifier in functions with external calls
### Description
**Proof of Concept**
The `NYProfitTakingVaultBaseV1` contract inherits from OpenZeppelin’s `ReentrancyGuard` contract and has marked most of its state-changing methods that do ERC20 external calls with the `nonReentrant` modifier... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [G‑04] `<array>.length` should not be looked up in every loop of a `for`-loop
### Description
The overheads outlined below are *PER LOOP*, excluding the first loop
* storage arrays incur a Gwarmaccess (**100 gas**)
* memory arrays use `MLOAD` (**3 gas**)
* calldata arrays use `CALLDATALOAD` (**3 gas**)
C... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: uint256/uint16 type mismatch
### Description
There is a parameter type mismatch in the `recovery_address_added` event. The `recovery_delay_in_days` parameter in the `recovery_address_added` event ([line 59](https://github.com/Zoltu/recoverable-wallet/blob/2207f5a7cc3b2607f7f97a769fbca7fe9235952b/contracts/sour... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Loss of precision due to rounding
### Description
[EllipticCurve.sol#L52](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-04-ens/blob/45ea10bacb2a398e14d711fe28d1738271cd7640/contracts/dnssec-oracle/algorithms/EllipticCurve.sol#L52) | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Outdated compiler version and floating pragma
### Description
**Outdated compiler version:**
It was identified an outdated compiler version in multiple contracts
As from the [official Solidity documentation](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.24/), it is recommended to use the latest released version of S... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Wrong Math | false | true |
A user can borrow DOLA interest-free. This requires the user to precisely manage their collateral. This issue might become especially troublesome if a Market is opened with some stablecoin as the collateral (because price fluctuations would become negligible and carefully managing collateral level would be easy).
Thi... | Code4rena | 4 | Inverse Finance |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Consider using custom errors instead of strings
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: BandofulfillableV1.sol
**Description**
Using custom errors is more gas-efficient than reverting with strings because they reduce storage and execution costs by not storing string l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Loose size coupling between function invocation and requirement
### Description
The implementation of the `emit_stack` function relies on the caller to use a sufficiently large buffer space to hold a Base64-encoded representation of the discriminator along with the serialized event. Failure to provide sufficie... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Business Logic | false | true | _Submitted by 0x52, also found by IllIllI_
Some user withdrawals won't be available for withdrawal even though it should be.
### Proof of Concept
`sendWithdrawalRequest` can only happen once per cycle. canBatchTransactions (L386) must return true for the actual withdrawal request to happen. It checks in L362 that cu... | Code4rena | 4 | Yieldy |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: When the `JUSDBank.withdraw()` is to another internal account the `ReserveInfo.isDepositAllowed` is not validated
### Description
The [internal withdraw](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-04-jojo/blob/main/JUSDV1/src/Impl/JUSDBank.sol#L348) does not validate if the collateral reserve has activated/deac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Balance Invariant Enforcement
### Description
## Token Balance Check
Add an explicit check to ensure that the token balance remains unchanged before and after executing `depositForBurnWithAuth`.
## Remediation
Incorporate the validation mentioned above.
### Recommendation
Incorporate the validation mention... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Not Returning Error or Reverting when Size Overflows
### Description
**Update**
The team fixed the issue as recommended in commit `67dc4a7`.
**File(s) affected:**`modules/crypto/src/keys.rs`
**Description:** The `calc_raw_sealed_data_size()` function returns `max` when there is an unexpected size. This is a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | logic | true | false | ## Medium: Missing Validation Checks in execute ✓ Fixed
### Description
The `Pool` contract implements a threshold voting mechanism for some changes in the contract state, where either the pool manager or a committee member can propose a change by calling `claim`, `changePoolManager`, `addToCommittee`, `removeFromComm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Initializer pattern in `ClFactory` lacks upgrade, risks frontrunning
### Description
The `CLFactory` contract uses an `initialize` function with the `initializer` modifier but does not implement any upgrade pattern (such as UUPSUpgradeable).
Recommendation to eliminate the risk of front-run initialization:
-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Slippage Vulnerability in PrimeX Protocol for Swap and Spot Trade Positions
### Description
**Update**
The team fixed the issue in the commit `ddf6d6a` with the allowing fine-grained control in the following places:
1. Added `maximumOracleTolerableLimit` and `needOracleTolerableLimitCheck` inputs to the `Sw... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Rebalancing can be indefinitely blocked due to ever-increasing `totalWithdrawalRequests`, causing locking of funds in vaults
### Description
Rebalancing can get stuck indefinitely at the `pushVaultAmounts` step due to an error in the accounting of `totalWithdrawalRequests`. As a result, funds will be locked... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | true | ## Low: IPriceOracle interface is used only in tests
### Description
The `IPriceOracle` interface is used only in tests, yet it appears alongside production code. Its location increases the risk that a developer will try to use it in production code. The complete interface appears in figure 10.1. Note that the interfa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: ly susceptible to theft
### Description
Physical US Dollar bills are highly susceptible to theft, especially through the “pickpocketing” attack vector. Any malicious user with enough proficiency in this kind of attack can remove an arbitrary amount of US dollars from an unsuspecting user, by substracting th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Import declarations should import specific symbols
### Description
Prefer import declarations that specify the symbol(s) using the form `import {SYMBOL} from "SomeContract.sol"` rather than importing the whole file.
*Instances (53)*: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Admin cannot be changed to EOA after deployment
### Description
_Submitted by Jeiwan, also found by datapunk_
After contracts are deployed and initialized, the admin address in `Kernel` contract can only be set to a contract. Granting and revoking roles will be possible to do only via a contract, which loo... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.