prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: After calling the function to remove the provider liquidation, only the value is removed, not the array element. Because of this, the size of the array will constantly increase, and all functions may not fit into the gas block, since they have unlimited cycles.
### Description
**Recommendation**:
use the Enu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Validators Cannot Receive More Than 32 ETH
### Description
Normally a staking validator node can have a maximum effective balance of 32 ETH. This means there is usually no reason to deposit any more than this amount to a validator as the extra ETH will not earn any staking rewards. Because of this, Swell Proto... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: No ERC20 safe* versions called
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel, also found by JMukesh and hickuphh3_
The `claim` function performs an ERC20 transfer `rewardsToken.transfer(to, claiming);` but does not check the return value, nor does it work with all legacy tokens.
Some tokens (like USDT) don't corr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: GeneralAdapter1.morphoRepay() incorrectly fetches the borrowShares of initiator instead of onBe-
### Description
## Half
**Severity:** Medium Risk
**Context:** GeneralAdapter1.sol#L309-L312, GeneralAdapter1.sol#L316
**Description:**
When `GeneralAdapter1.morphoRepay()` is called with `shares == type... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing events in `NodeOperatorRegistry` update methods
### Description
The following functions in `NodeOperatorRegistry` update multiple storage locations but don't emit any events:
* `updateOperatorControllingAddress`
* `updateOperatorRewardAddress`
* `updateOperatorName`
Consider emitting events in these f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Make sure requesters provide the payment type and also the max delivery rate to the re- quest endpoints
### Description
Currently, when a request is created by a requester, the `deliveryRate` and `paymentType` are fetched from the corresponding `priorityMech` of a service ID. Just before this transaction ge... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: Rebalancer can drain market funds via excessive bridge fees
### Description
The `REBALANCER_EOA` role, which is considered semi-trusted, can drain funds from any market by specifying an arbitrarily high `maxFee` when initiating a bridge transfer through `EverclearBridge.sol`. This violates the trust assumpt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Uninitialized Implementation Contract
### Description
**Update**
The client fixed the issue in `f8a3ea41e2411099792788c888bc41f8c30d345f` by calling `_disableInitializers()` in the constructor.
**File(s) affected:**`MeowToken.sol`
**Description:** The new implementation contains an initialize function that m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Loans Can Quickly Become Under-Collateralized in Volatile Market Conditions
### Description
**Update**
A change has been applied to the health calculation, such that liquidation is only possible if the leftover collateral in GLP after paying back the loan is less than `10%` of the of original collateral in ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Missing constraint on the setter method of a percentage value
### Description
**Impact:**
High, as it will result in wrong reward calculations
**Likelihood:**
Low, as it requires a malicious/compromised owner or a big error on his side
**Description**
The `setResetShareValue` lacks a check that the `_new... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: `perp_statistics_reset` can be used by users to skip `collactable-losses` while selling market seat
### Description
Inside `perp-statistics-reset` we set [soc loss funds](https://github.com/deriverse/protocol-v1/blob/30b06d2da69e956c000120cdc15907b5f33088d7/src/program/processor/perp_statistics_reset.rs#L91... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: addToPosition() Incorrectly Adding More Amount to the Position and CDTSupply
### Description
The `addToPosition()` function of the NFTPool contract is incorrectly updating the token's position and the CDT supply. More specifically, it is using an incorrect value returned by the `_transferThere()` function to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Immutable Delegate Address Elevates Security Risk
### Description
If the delegate address becomes compromised (e.g., the private keys are stolen, or the address is otherwise controlled by a malicious actor), the contract has no built-in mechanism to change this address. This immutability could lead to security... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: BaseConicPool's `cachedTotalUnderlying()` and `usdExchangeRate()` might work incorrectly
### Description
Both `cachedTotalUnderlying()` and `usdExchangeRate()` utilize `_cachedTotalUnderlying` in their computations. The `_cachedTotalUnderlying` variable gets updated in the `withdraw()` function. Note that `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | true | false | ## Medium: When calling LeverageMacroBase.doOperation to open a CDP, the POST CALL CHECK may use the wrong cdpId
### Description
After [LeverageMacroBase.doOperation](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-badger/blob/main/packages/contracts/contracts/LeverageMacroBase.sol#L118-L124) is used to open a new CDP, there wi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Stable swap pools don’t properly handle assets with different decimals, forcing LPs to receive wrong shares
### Description
Stable swap pools in Mantra implement Curve’s stable swap logic, this is mentioned in the [docs](https://docs.mantrachain.io/mantra-smart-contracts/mantra_dex/pool-manager# stableswap). ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: [03] User can withdraw in multiple calls with small amount to escape fee
### Description
The [Vault::withdraw()](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-05-bakerfi/blob/main/contracts/core/Vault.sol#L260-L264) function rounds-down the fee against the protocol's favour and hence a user can split their withdraw tx in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | true | ## High: Incorrect handling of `pricefeed.decimals()`
### Description
### Impact
Wrong math for handling pricefeed decimals. This code will only work for pricefeeds of 8 decimals, any others give wrong/incorrect data. The maths used can be shown in three lines:
Line1: adds 4 decimals
Line2: adds (18 - d) decimals, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Indexing issues in `removeCardBundlesFromPacketPool()`
### Description
_Resolved_
The `removeCardBundlesFromPacketPool` function in the `CardAllocationPool` contract allows for the removal of card bundles by passing their indices.
However, this approach is flawed due to the **dynamic nature of the indices**... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistencies In Math Module Implementation
### Description
## Comet Precision Issues
The precision of the fixed-point math in Comet is **107**, which is low compared to that set in **BalancerV1**, which is **1018**. This low precision in the Comet system may be problematic in scenarios where there are t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Deposits Made Before Hook Connection are not Accounted for Rewards
### Description
This issue has been identified within the `HookTargetStakeDelegator` contract. When the hook is connected after deposits have been made, the reward vault balance is not properly initialized. As a result, any funds that were d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Inaccurate share price due to lack of withdrawal tracking
### Description
The `DepositETH` and `DepositUSD` contracts fail to update the withdrawal counters (`ethWithdrawn`/`stableWithdrawn`) and shares (`nETHMinted`, `nUSDMinted`) when processing withdrawals.
This leads to incorrect accounting because the s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent use of the FixLib library
### Description
According to the protocol specification for arithmetic operations, all computations performed on `uint192` values, which represent `uint192x18` variables, should use the **FixLib** library. However, numerous computations in the codebase do not comply with ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Inaccurate stake calculation due to decimal mismatch across multitoken asset classes
### Description
**Description:** Currently, when calculating the operator stake, the system iterates through all vaults associated with a specific asset class ID and sums all of the staked amounts. However, an asset class m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Iterating over unbounded arrays can result in DoS
### Description
The `GaugeProxy` contract has the `addSubGauge` method which pushes new elements to the `gauges` and `stakingTokens` arrays. Both of those arrays' sizes should be capped due to the fact that if too many items are added to them then iterating ove... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Long functions should be refactored into multiple, smaller, functions
### Description
Long functions should be refactored into multiple, smaller, functions | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Local variable not used
### Description
## Email Recovery Command Handler
**Context:** EmailRecoveryCommandHandler.sol#L78
**Description:**
The function call `hexToBytes32()` is useful for safety checks, but the `calldataHash` local variable isn't used.
**Recommendation:**
Don't store the return value:
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Use `SafeERC20` approval and transfer functions instead of standard IERC20 functions for `liquidityToken`
### Description
The on-ramping and off-ramping processes are linked to external liquidity tokens such as stablecoins whose code is not controlled by the protocol; hence use [`SafeERC20::forceApprove, trans... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Fee-vault can be made insolvent in case of defaults
### Description
### Finding description and impact
In case of a loan default, the backstop funds are insufficient to cover the liability. In this case, the hit is taken by the collateral providers, and the `b_rate` drops.
In this scenario, the `b_rate` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Hardcoded referral fee
### Description
Though `protocolFeeWithReferralBips` and `creatorFeeWithReferralBips` fees can be changed the `referralFeeBips` is hardcoded.
Consider setting the difference between `protocolFeeBips` and `protocolFeeWithReferralBips` as a new `referralFeeBips` value in the `setProtocol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing address(0) check in setPOLFeeCollector()
### Description
Severity: Low Risk
Context: ProtocolFeesCollector.sol#L98
Description: The setPOLFeeCollector() can be used to set the polFeeCollector variable.
function setPOLFeeCollector(address _polFeeCollector) external override authenticate {
polFeeCollecto... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: redeem function will always revert due to double asset transfer
### Description
Severity: Low Risk
Context: WrappedVault.sol#L534-L537
Description: The redeem function has an incorrect sequence of asset transfers that causes it to always
revert, making it impossible for users to execute the function successful... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Limit swap orders can be used to get a free look into the future
### Description
Users can cancel their limit swap orders to get a free look into prices in future blocks
### Impact
There is a lot of work involved in calculating statistics about block ranges for oracles and their processing time/queues, and e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Treasury cannot withdraw expired assets if NFT is disabled
### Description
The `STBL_LT1_Issuer::withdrawExpired` function attempts to claim rewards for disabled NFTs, but the `STBL_LT1_YieldDistributor::claim` function explicitly reverts when called on disabled NFTs.
In `STBL_LT1_Issuer.withdrawExpired`:
``... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Hardcoded addresses are used for crucial roles
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
The `Fias.sol` contract implements 3 crucial roles, `FOREVVER_MINTER`, `LITCRAFT_MINTER`, `CONTRACT_ADMIN`. These addresses are hardcoded, this can lead to a scenario where the protocol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | safeTransfer - code size check | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-bond-judging/issues/8
## Found by
Bnke0x0, 8olidity
## Summary
## Vulnerability Detail
## Impact
the safetransfer and safetransferfrom don't check the existence of code at the token address. This is a known issue while using solmate's libraries. Hence th... | Sherlock | 3 | Bond Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | false | false | ## High: If a transaction reverts, its authentication token can be reused by any user to authenticate any transaction
### Description
Authentication tokens can be reused in future transactions when an original transaction is reverted. Each transaction in Term Finance requires a special authentication token created by ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Collect front run permit
### Description
## Context
(No context files were provided by the reviewer)
The principal token is exposing a function call `permitCollector` to allow an owner to approve a collector. This function is receiving a signature and setting the collector to the signer of the signature.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Mistake in ENR key for discovery
### Description
## Severity: Medium Risk
**Context:** `eth/protocols/eth/discovery.go#L36`
**Description:** This function will return "over1" when it should return "over".
**Recommendation:** Change the return value to "over". | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: [53] Missing event for critical changes
### Description
Events should be emitted when critical changes are made to the contracts.
There are 13 instances:
PrimaryLiquidationFacet.sol ([122-124](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-dittoeth/blob/91faf46078bb6fe8ce9f55bcb717e5d2d302d22e/contracts/facets/Primar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unused parameter
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**
The function `setFee` in the `StableSwapPool.sol` and `XYKPool.sol` contracts takes `decayRate_` as parameter but it is not needed as it is not used.
**Recommendation**:
It’s recommended that unused par... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Front-runnable Initializers
### Description
All contract **initializers** were missing access controls, allowing any user to initialize the contract. By front-running the contract deployers to initialize the contract, the incorrect parameters may be supplied, leaving the contract needing to be redeployed.
###... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Invalid-ID Errors Across Claim Surfaces
### Description
Different entry points revert with varying errors for the same invalid `distributionId`. `getDistribution()` uses `InvalidDistributionId`, while the claim path via `_hookGetMerkleRoot()` and `getVestedAmount()` bubbles `PeriodNotFound`.
### ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Erroneous Truffle configuration
### Description
An error in the `truffle.js` configuration file prevents Truffle 5 from running with the specified solc version (0.4.24). [Current configuration](https://github.com/propsproject/props-token-distribution/blob/eaf0c6fddd320a258a9d7531d72d07a830fae58a/truffle.js#L10... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Callback verification can be made more secure
### Description
The current callback verification is safe enough, but to increase the security of the protocol we would recommend saving the address of the pool that is used in the `_createLimitOrder` function to the storage variable to check that callback is calle... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Shares burned in `Staking.unstake()` can be underestimated
### Description
In the `Staking.unstake()` function, the calculation of the shares to be burned for the user is done as follows:
The results of the division operations in lines 81 and 84 are rounded down due to the truncation of the division operatio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Protocol rewards tokens permanently stuck
### Description
During liquidations, the protocol seizes a portion of collateral tokens (2.8%) as protocol rewards. These seized tokens are tracked in the `protocolReward` mapping but have no mechanism for withdrawal, causing them to be permanently stuck in the contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Owner Can Renounce Ownership
### Description
It was identified that the `StakerLightFactory` contract inherited from OpenZeppelin's `Ownable2Step` library. In the `Ownable2Step` contracts, the `renounceOwnership()` function is used to renounce the `Owner` permission. Renouncing ownership before transferring wo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Input Validation Checks for Drippie.create
### Description
The `Drippie.create` function does not validate input, potentially leading to unintended results. The function should check the following:
- `_name` is not an empty string to avoid creating a drip that would be able to read on the frontend UI.
- `_con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Inflating the votes of the hash for a malicious trie data structure to bypass the consensus system and modify account data
### Description
Report type: Blockchain/DLT
Target: https://github.com/shardeum/shardus-core/tree/dev
Impacts:
- Direct loss of funds
## Description
## Brief/Intro
In Shardeum, no si... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Lack of Access Control for offer(uint, ERC20, uint, ERC20) and insert(uint, unint)
### Description
_Submitted by xiaoming90, also found by throttle_
### Proof of Concept
The `offer(uint, ERC20, uint, ERC20)` and `insert(uint, unint)` should only be accessible by the keepers as per the comments. However, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: L01] Use of hash constants without comment
### Description
###### Low
Component: [`policy`](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/tree/af3428020545e3f3ae2f3567b94e1fbc5e5bdb4c/contracts/policy)
In the `PolicedUtils`, there are [11 constants for the identifiers of the policies](https://github.com/BeamNetw... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | token | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-01-optimism-judging/issues/220
## Found by
Barichek, lemonmon
## Summary
If a custom contract implements only the `IOptimismMintableERC20`, but no the `ILegacyMintableERC20`, the contract is not compatible with the `StandardBridge`, as the bridge uses the `l1Token` ... | Sherlock | 5 | Optimism |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Unused import statements
### Description
Within the codebase, the following unused imports were identified:
**oracle/OracleUtils.sol:**
* `import "../utils/Printer.sol";`
**oracle/Oracle.sol:**
* `import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeCast.sol";`
* `import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/St... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Misleading NATSPEC comments
### Description
In the `updatePlan` function of the `ContributorMultiTierStaking` contract, the NATSPEC comment is misleading. The comment states that the function is for deactivating a plan, but the function actually updates the plan, from an active to an inactive state and vice ve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing validation of input address of user on signup
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In NarwhalReferrals.sol - Method signUp() , we have _user is not assured to be non-zero address in case that the caller of this method is storageT.
**Recommendation**
Add... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Comments should be enforced by `require()`s
### Description
The comments below should be enforced by `require(block.timestamp
**[cryptolyndon (AbraNFT) commented](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-abranft-findings/issues/75#issuecomment-1124529466):**
> **Low-risk issues:**
>
> **[L-03]** Agreed; this... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary random number request with single NFT in queue
### Description
The function `ApiologyAuctionsHouse::_createAuction` currently makes a request for a random number even when there is only one NFT in the `auctionQueue`. This is inefficient as there is no need for random selection when only one item is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | false | false | ## Medium: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in go-jose (github.com/dvsekhvalnov/jose2go)
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Status:** Acknowledged
**Description:**
The library is vulnerable to uncontrolled resource consumption due to improper input validation, which could lead to excessive memory or CPU usage... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use `selfbalance()` instead of `address(this).balance`
### Description
In Solidity, contracts often need to query their own Ether balance. While `address(this).balance` has been a widely used approach to retrieve the current contract's balance, it is not the most gas-efficient method, especially with the intro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Pyth oracle price is not validated properly
### Description
The `PythAggregator` contract does not perform input validation on the `price`, `conf`, and `expo` values returned from the called price feed, which can lead to the contract accepting invalid or untrusted prices. Those values should be checked as c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Improper Normalized Amount Updating On State
### Description
## SpotEngine SocializeSubaccount Function Issue
In SpotEngine’s `socializeSubaccount` function, the negative balance amount is being added to the total borrow, instead of being subtracted.
Since `socializeSubAccount` is clearing the borrow and... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `MAX_ROYALTY_RECIPIENTS_INDEX` set too low
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
[NFTMarketFees.sol#L78](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-foundation/blob/4d8c8931baffae31c7506872bf1100e1598f2754/contracts/mixins/NFTMarketFees.sol#L78)
The creator payouts are capped at `MAX_ROYALTY_RECIPIENTS_INDEX`.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Implicit Returns
### Description
Some functions that return values do so explicitly. For example, the [`logic`](https://github.com/InstaDApp/contract-v2/blob/4863c0c4156af7ded9cdb38b66e5f5e527c4a6d0/contracts/InstaRegistry.sol#L62) and [`logicStatic`](https://github.com/InstaDApp/contract-v2/blob/4863c0c4156af... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Derive min / max collection bounds dynamically
### Description
**54,522 gas can be saved.**
| Method | Before | After | Gas Saved | Test Passes? |
|-----------|------------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| `NextGenCore:setCollectionData()` | 199090 | 154389 | 44701 | Yes |
| `NextGenCore:burn()` | 84270 | ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: User cannot withdraw stakingToken due to incorrect calculation of _totalSupply
### Description
User cannot withdraw `stakingToken` due to incorrect calculation of `_totalSupply`
### Impact
User cannot withdraw stakingToken
### Recommendation
```solidity
function revokeVestingSchedule(address account) exte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | false | false | ## Medium: Protocol can break for a token with a proxy and implementation contract (like `TUSD`)
### Description
Tokens whose code and logic can be changed in future can break the protocol and lock user funds.
### Impact
Protocol may break in future for this collateral and block user funds deposited as collateral. Al... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Users can be griefed due to lack of minimum size within the Loan and Offer
### Description
_No response_
### Impact
Malicious aggregators to grief lenders and borrowers.
### Recommendation
Having a maximum number of offers (e.g., 100) within a single Loan is insufficient to guard against this attack becau... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `isLiquidatable()` May Return Incorrect Results
### Description
**Update**
The `Liquidator` now queries the `ClearingHouse` for the `maintenanceMarginRatio`.
**File(s) affected:**`keeper/Liquidator.sol`, `ClearingHouse.sol`
**Description:**`Liquidator.isLiquidatable()` returns true when a user's margin ratio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Unbounded loops
### Description
The `Repo`s and the deployed `OptionContract`s are registered by pushing [the `Repo` structs](https://github.com/opynfinance/Convexity-Protocol/blob/c34598565cba2bfcf824eb2da63d95c7f5dda4fa/contracts/OptionsContract.sol#L202) and [the contract addresses](https://github.com/opynf... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: | Access Modifiers
### Description
**Description**
Throughout the contract there are several require statements that assert the `msg.sender` is the `tempAdmin`. These `require` statements can be deduplicated into a single `onlyTempAdmin` modifier that can be used on each of these functions.
**Recommendation*... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: UNABLE TO CLAIM PAYOUTS
### Description
The `getExcludedCoverageOf` and `getClaimableOf` can be deadlocked since the `voteTimestamp` is used without verification whether the last incident is on vote state or not those returning `voteTimestamp` of 0 and causing the `_getEOD` to underflow. Furthermore, the repo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: `ReseedSilo` does not set the necessary user variables
### Description
`ReseedSilo` does not set the necessary user variables
### Impact
Loss of funds | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: `processBurns` can be front-run with `cancelBurn` causing failure of RLP batch burning
### Description
`LPExternalRequestsManager.sol#L409-L423`
`LPExternalRequestsManager.sol#L329-L344`
The `LPExternalRequestsManager` contract's `processBurns` method, which processes an epoch's selected batch of RLPs to b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Storage `\_\_gap` is misplaced
### Description
The contracts `VeQoda` and `RewardDistributor` are upgradeable contracts, and therefore, it is recommended to use the `__gap` state variable to ensure that the state of the contract will be preserved across upgrades.
However, it was identified that the `uint256[5... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Users cannot make compensation when the due date is within the minimum tenor period
### Description
*Note: At the judge’s request [here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-06-size-findings/issues/127#issuecomment-2244619915), this downgraded issue from the same warden has been included in this report for compl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | true | ## Medium: Front-running pool’s initialization can lead to draining of liquidity provider’s initial deposits
### Description
A front-run on `UniswapV3Pool.initialize` allows an attacker to set an unfair price and to drain assets from the first deposits. `UniswapV3Pool.initialize` initiates the pool’s price:
```solidi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Activate the Optimizer
### Description
Before deploying your contract, activate the optimizer when compiling using `solc --optimize --bin sourceFile.sol`. By default, the optimizer will optimize the contract assuming it is called 200 times across its lifetime. If you want the initial contract deployment to be ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | true | ## High: OrderNFT theft due to controlling future and past tokens of same order index
### Description
The order queue is implemented as a ring buffer. To retrieve an order (`Orderbook.getOrder`), the index in the queue is computed as `orderIndex % _MAX_ORDER`. The owner of an `OrderNFT` also uses this function.
```so... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Access Control
### Description
## Increase Oracle Length
The `increase_oracle_length` function in Oracle is utilized to incorporate new sample slots into the oracle. It may be accessed by anyone, which might result in unnecessary addition of samples, causing the predefined maximum length (`MAX_ORACLE_LENGTH`)... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Inaccurate Depth Docstring
### Description
## ConcurrentMerkleTreeHeader Documentation
The docstring above `ConcurrentMerkleTreeHeader` definition is presented below.
## File: concurrent_merkle_tree_header.rs
However, it is possible to initialize and operate on `Concurrent Merkle Tree` with depth equal to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Implement SafeERC20 to avoid non-zero to non-zero approvals
### Description
## Severity: Low Risk
**Context:** TransferHelper.sol#L12-L13
The current function allows for non-zero to non-zero approvals; however, some ERC20 tokens would revert in such cases. Reference: approval race protections.
## Recommend... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Incomplete mapping updates in `setVault` function cause vault address inconsistencies
### Description
The `RWASegWrap::setVault` function allows admins to update the vault address for a specific vault ID, but it fails to properly maintain the bidirectional mapping between vault addresses and vault IDs. The fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: The _calculatePendingRewards can run out of gas
### Description
The reward rate in STokens can be changed, and the history of these changes are stored in the contract:
**code/contracts/STokensV2.sol:L124-L139**
```
function setRewardRate(uint256 rewardRate)
public
virtual
override
returns (bool succ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Storage variables are never used.
### Description
**Description**
AutoCompounder.sol: 'rdntToken', 'IpTokenAddress', 'baseToRdnt'.
Eligibility DataProvider.sol: 'baseToken PriceInUsd ProxyAggregator'.
Disqualifiers.sol: treasury`.
MiddleFee Distribution.sol: 'minters', 'mintersAreSet'.
Variables are never... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `Funding.claimAssetToTreasury()`: `asset` should get cached
### Description
See `@audit` tag: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Slippage protection in SwitchCollateralRouter.execute()
### Description
The `SwitchCollateralRouter` and associated dexters don't enforce slippage protection themselves. Instead, the slippage protection happens within the `switchCollateral()` function in `CrossMarginService`. This serves as the primary mechani... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Legitimate pools can be taken over and the penalty is not fair.
### Description
In [GoatV1Pair.takeOverPool()](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-03-goat-trading/blob/main/goat-trading/contracts/exchange/GoatV1Pair.sol#L453-L538), a malicious user can take over pool from a legitimate user, because the m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: timeToEpochEnd calculates backwards, breaking protocol math
### Description
When a lien is liquidated, it calls `timeToEpochEnd()` to determine if a liquidation accountant should be deployed and we should adjust the protocol math to expect payment in a future epoch. Because of an error in the implementation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | cross-chain | false | false | ## High: Users will lose funds due to token decimal mismatches across chains
### Description
The lack of decimal normalization in cross-chain token transfers will cause users to lose significant funds, as borrowers will receive incorrect amounts when borrowing across chains with different token decimals.
### Impact
T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Misleading range / incorrect error message in `getRequestsByIdRange`
### Description
If the caller specifies `start` = `end`, which may be intention to obtain exactly one item, they receive the `start > end` error, which is misleading and incorrect.
Related code: https://github.com/fbtc-xyz/fbtc-contract/blob... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: | Unexpected Rewards
### Description
**Description**
The allowance is used to determine how much WETH to inject into the `Rewards` system and it is incremented based on the current balance of the `TransferReceiver`.
However the balance of the `TransferReceiver` can be inflated by transferring WETH directly... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Accidental call of addQuest could block contracts
### Description
The `addQuest()` function uses an `onlyAllowed` access control modifier. This modifier checks if `msg.sender` is `questBoard` or `owner`. However, the `QuestBoard.sol` contract has a QuestID registration and a token whitelisting mechanism whi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Uninitialized `maturityDate` in `Strategy.create()`
### Description
The `Strategy.create()` function declares a `maturityDate` return value but never initializes or sets it. This uninitialized value, which defaults to `0`, is returned and passed through to `OperationalTreasury._buy()`, where it's emitted via t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: `MagnetarHelper.getFractionForAmount` uses the wrong rounding and will yield the wrong result
### Description
`MagnetarHelper.getFractionForAmount` is used to determine the `fraction` (shares) that will be received when an `amount` is deposited. The code needs to compute the `totalShares` and then determine... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Managed Pools are still undergoing development and may contain bugs and/or significant changes
### Description
The ManagedPool smart pool implementation of WeightedPool is still in active development by the Balancer team and could have unknown bugs. Additionally, the current version in Balancer’s GitHub is di... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Booster's shutdownPool can freeze user funds
### Description
_Submitted by hyh, also found by jonatascm_
`shutdownPool()` marks shutdown successful even if it's not (i.e. when withdrawAll() call wasn't successful). As withdrawing logic expect that the pool in shutdown has already provided the funds, and ma... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: JIT penalty on fresh fees can be bypassed
### Description
Collect path pays without JIT penalty and resets the age. [MakerFacet.collectFees](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2025-09-ammplify/blob/main/Ammplify/src/facets/Maker.sol#L131-L155) computes the owed fees via a full walk, settles them to the user,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: A possible transfer of funds of another athlete
### Description
There is no check that an athlete has already transferred funds to the contract here: https://github.com/FantiumAG/smart-contracts/blob/a2d126453c1105028f12277b8f342d2cdbf01a77/contracts/claiming/FantiumClaimingV1.sol#L624-L652
It means that the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Users Can Reset Bond Depositor’s Vesting Period
### Description
## Handle
leastwood
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The `VaderBond.deposit()` function overwrites a depositors bond info on each call with the updated `payout` information. If any of the vesting is left unclaimed before a call to `depos... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.