prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Asymmetric gauge unregistration can result in misallocation of tokens
### Description
**Description:** The reward speed preservation logic in the `BenqiCoreModule` contract enables indefinite QI token distributions for markets associated with asymmetrically unregistered or otherwise expired supply/borrow gauge... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Redundant call of validate\_pool\_id in burn
### Description
The `burn` function contains a redundant call to `validate_pool_id`:
```
fn burn(pool_id: PoolId, to: Identity) -> (u64, u64) {
reentrancy_guard();
validate_pool_id(pool_id);
...
}
```
as it is already done when calling `get_pool`:
```
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Single-step ownership change introduces risks in feecontroller
### Description
The FeeController contract is currently using Ownable from OpenZeppelin, inheriting the default `transferOwnership()` function. This introduces a potential risk of unauthorized or accidental ownership transfers, which could compromi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Wrong returns of `SavingsAccountUtil.depositFromSavingsAccount()` can cause fund loss
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
The function `SavingsAccountUtil.depositFromSavingsAccount()` is expected to return the number of equivalent shares for given `_asset`.
However, since `savingsAccountTransfer()` doe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | true | false | ## Medium: Protocol uses manipulatable randomness
### Description
The protocol generates a random number to choose which distributor will be able to commit rewards for a span of blocks. The issue is in the way the protocol generates this randomness.
```solidity
function distributorIndex() public view returns (uint256... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Usage of IERC20 methods would fail on some tokens due to lack of return of boolean value
### Description
In some contracts, IERC20 methods (`transfer`/`approve`) are used, and will fail when used with some tokens. Most notable and popular example of this is USDT on Ethereum mainnet, which lacks a boolean re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Error-prone code duplication
### Description
There is an extremely high level of code duplication in the contracts. Although it is not causing a problem in the current version of the code, it is highly likely that small revisions will create bugs.
For example, there are six different implementations of tran... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: DoS attack exhausting account space and halting spot trading
### Description
**Description:** The temporary spot client ID allocation system reserves space in both `client_infos_acc` and `client_infos2_acc` accounts when orders are created, but deallocation only occurs when specific cleanup functions are invo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Collateral double-spend post liquidation is possible
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:**
High, as a borrower can double-spend his collateral
**Likelihood:**
High, as liquidations never subtract the collateral amount
**Description**
In `AssetManager::assetTransferOnLoanAction` in the `if (action == As... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Unused using Lib for statement
### Description
There is a `using ECDSA for bytes32;` statement declared in the contract; however, it is not utilized by the contract for `bytes32`, as the library is explicitly called within the contract.
### Recommendation
- Either remove this unnecessary statement for minimal... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Refinancing in the same pool requires it to have a higher balance than needed because of a flawed check
### Description
Refinancing a loan into the same pool it is in requires the pool to have `the original loan amount +- the difference` because it doesn't check whether the pool already has the original amount... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Early user can call issue() and then melt() to increase basketsNeeded to supply ratio to its maximum value and then melt() won’t work and contract features like issue() won’t work
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/reserve-protocol/protocol/blob/df7ecadc2bae74244ace5e8b39e94bc992903158/con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: # [M-04] voucherIndexes is not updated when member cancel the voucher
### Description
When staker or borrower cancel the voucher, the `voucherIndexes` for the lastVoucher is not updated.
### Impact
It leads to incorrect index for the last voucher, which points to another voucher with different staker. It c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `Voter` rewards for dead gauges become stuck due to missing transfer
### Description
In the `Voter` contract, the `_updateFor()` function is responsible for updating the rewards of a gauge based on its vote weight, which is recorded in the `claimable` mapping. The function checks if the gauge is **alive** befo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing revert message in `transfer` function (line 46) of UniMexToken.sol
### Description
**Description**
In contract UniMexToken.sol in function transfer at line 46 there's no revert message.
**Recommendation**
Add a revert message.
**Re-audit comment**
Unresolved | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: Missing `Liquidation` event emission when `bufferSurplus > 0`
### Description
In the `LiquidationManager` contract, the `liquidate()` function does not emit the `Liquidation` event when a `bufferSurplus` is > 0 as the function returns before the event is emitted if there is any surplus collateral.
Recommenda... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Improved checks in the setPotData
### Description
Within the `setPotData` function, various checks are performed when updating the data:
- `nextData.dsr` to not be greater than `maxDSR`.
- `nextData.rho` to not be greater than `block.timestamp`.
- `nextData.dsr` to not be lower than `RAY`.
These checks are *... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: `isNewYToken` can be omitted in YToken contracts
### Description
To support the accounting of underlying assets, a new parameter `isNewYToken` was introduced in `mintYToken`. This parameter is used in the [`dYTokenL1::mintYToken`](https://github.com/YieldFiLabs/contracts/blob/702a931df3adb2f6e48807203cdc7a9260... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incorrect deployment parameters
### Description
_Submitted by Picodes_
### Impact
The address of G-Uni tokens in the deployment scripts are not up to date.
### Proof of Concept
For example for agEUR/USDC it is 0xedecb43233549c51cc3268b5de840239787ad56c and not 0x2bD9F7974Bc0E4Cb19B8813F8Be6034F3E772add... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: `PrizePool.awardExternalERC721()` Erroneously Emits Events
### Description
_Submitted by leastwood_.
#### Impact
The `awardExternalERC721()` function uses solidity's try and catch statement to ensure a single tokenId cannot deny function execution. If the try statement fails, an `ErrorAwardingExternalERC7... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use != 0 instead of > 0 for unsigned integer comparison
### Description
**Client:**
Fixed.
**Cyfrin:** Verified in commit [b21d23e](https://github.com/HyperGood/woosh-contracts/commit/b21d23e661b0f25f0e757dc00ee90e4464730b1b). | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Function destruct in HappyTokenPool contract does not reset pool's Packed3 struct fields and also does not set pool's claimed variable to true.
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description**:
This allows a user to be able to call the claim function even when the pool is d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect documentation of `registerControllerFactory()`
### Description
[WildcatArchController Line 106](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-wildcat/blob/main/src/WildcatArchController.sol#L106)
### Issue Description
The documentation in the [GitBook](https://wildcat-protocol.gitbook.io/wildcat/technical-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unbounded Error Message Length in Paymaster External Calls Creates Gas Unpredictability
### Description
The `EntryPoint` contract handles error messages from paymaster calls without imposing size limits. This occurs in two critical locations where external calls to paymaster contracts are made: `_validatePayma... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: totalSupply may exceed LibBasketStorage.basketStorage().maxCap
### Description
## Handle
Czar102
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Total supply of the token may exceed the `maxCap` introduced. This can happen when a user wants to join the pool. The [check in `BasketFacet::joinPool(...)`](https://githu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: IBC channel version negotiation bypass in IBC hooks middleware
### Description
### Finding description and impact
The `OnChanOpenInit` function in `ibc_middleware.go` incorrectly returns the original version parameter instead of the negotiated `finalVersion` returned by the underlying app.
The middleware... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Unnecessary execution mode support in `DelegationMetaSwapAdapter`
### Description
**Description:** The `executeFromExecutor` function in the `DelegationMetaSwapAdapter` supports multiple execution modes (batch/single) and execution types (default/try). However, in practice, the adapter's main function swapByDe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | true | false | ## High: Calculation for `owedAmount` will round down to zero
### Description
**Impact:**
High, as this will result in 0 claimable rewards for users when they should have been able to claim some
**Likelihood:**
High, as this will happen any time the user's share is smaller than the pool's cached global share, which i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: sendMessage Reentrancy on L2 Could Result in Unordered MessageSent Events
### Description
The `sendMessage` function can be called on L2 to send a cross-chain message to L1. When doing so, `coinbaseFee` is collected from the value sent and transferred to the `block.coinbase` through a low-level [call](https://... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: `GelatoVRFConsumerBase` is not upgrade-safe
### Description
**Description:** The `SpinGame` contract has been changed to be upgradeable. But, the contract inherits from `GelatoVRFConsumerBase`, which is not upgrade-safe as it lacks a reserved storage gap (`uint256[x] private __gap`) to prevent future storage c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: RLP can be added as collateral token in `LPExternalRequestsManager`
### Description
Neither the `LPExternalRequestsManager` contract's `constructor` nor its `addAllowedToken` method rejects the attempt to add `ISSUE_TOKEN_ADDRESS` (RLP) as collateral token for minting/burning the same RLP.
Even though it requ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect Off-Chain Accounting of Tokens Swapped in `swapETH()`
### Description
**Update**
The client doesn't want to read the balance before and after the swap inside the method to optimize gas fees. They will do a backend check to track the amount of tokens swapped.
**File(s) affected:**`ReachMainDistributi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | true | ## High: Using spot price can cause a price manipulation attack
### Description
In the V3TwapKimUtilities.sol contract, the method \_sqrtPriceX96FromPoolAndInterval retrieves the spot price from the pool's global state. This approach is vulnerable to price manipulation, as the spot price can be influenced by malicious... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | true | false | ## High: MISSING COMPARISON BETWEEN MSG VALUE AND AMOUNT LEADS TO DRAINING OF THE FUNDS
### Description
A smart contract that is missing a **msg.value == amount** check may be vulnerable to various types of attacks or errors. This check is typically used to verify that the amount of Ether (or other value token) being ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Improper Upper Bound Definition on the Fee
### Description
_Submitted by defsec, also found by gzeon, nathaniel, WatchPug, cmichel, and pauliax_
#### Impact
In the `adjustGlobalParams` function on line 1603 of "", `adjustGlobalParams` function does not have any upper or lower bounds. Values that are too ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: `USDCBridgeV2` can't bridge to non-EVM chains even though Wormhole and Circle CCTP support this
### Description
**Description:** Both Wormhole and Circle CCTP support bridging between EVM and non-EVM chains, however `USCBridgeV2` prevents bridging to non-EVM chains since:
1) `_sendUSDCWithPayloadToEvm` always... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Missing Chain Deactivation Functionality in the `OracleTrigger` contract
### Description
This issue has been identified within the `OracleTrigger` contract. While the contract provides functions to add and update chains (`addChain` and `updateChain`), there is no function to deactivate or remove a chain config... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Missing input validation in FeeAuction.buy allows payment without asset transfer
### Description
The `FeeAuction.buy` function lacks validation for the `_assets` parameter, allowing buyers to pay the auction price without receiving any assets when an empty array or zero balance token addresses are provided.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | other | true | false | ## High: Call selector mismatch will cause unstaking to revert
### Description
In the Chainlink staking the `StakingPoolBase::unstake` call looks like this:
```solidity
function unstake(uint256 amount) external {
```
However in `Vault::withdraw` it is called like this:
```solidity
stakeController.unstake(_am... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Calculation For Exponential Curves
### Description
## Infinity Swap Audit 04 | Vulnerabilities
The inverse operation of \( V \times (1 + \delta) \) is \( V / (1 + \delta) \). The Exponential curves incorrectly implement the price decrement step as \( V \times (1 - \delta) \). Since \( V \times (1 +... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: REGISTRY CANNOT BE RE-ENABLED
### Description
The `ContractRegistry` contract is responsible for storing the addresses of the token contracts that are `Saferoot` verified. If this contract is disabled in the `Saferoot` contract, it can no longer be re-enabled. As a result, users could no longer use it to verif... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: `PledgeManager::pricePerToken` can only support a maximum price of `$4294`
### Description
`PledgeManager::pricePerToken` uses `uint32` and indicates in the comment it represents USD price using 6 decimals of precision:
```solidity
uint32 public pricePerToken; //in usd (6 decimals)
```
### Impact
Since th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | reentrancy | true | false |
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/e5efa8f9d6dda92a90b8b2c4902320acf0c26816/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowCore.sol#L893-L908><br>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-golom/blob/e5efa8f9d6dda92a90b8b2c4902320acf0c26816/contracts/vote-escrow/VoteEscrowCore.sol#L1004-L1030><br>
<https://github.com/c... | Code4rena | 5 | Golom |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: Blind auction bid amount can 't resist brute-force attack
### Description
When bidders enter the blind auction, they make a blind bid and then reveal the bid amount. When making a blind bid, the protocol saves a hash for the bidder. When revealing the bid amount, it requires that the `bidAmount` provided by... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect Gas Computation in Modexp
### Description
The `Modexp` precompiled contract (PrecompiledContracts.java#L233-L257) is supposed to cost a minimum of 400 gas. In reality, it only costs four times the number of bytes of its arguments.
```java
@Override
public long getGasForData(byte[] data) {
retur... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Initial Ownership Claimable by Anyone Both Directly and via a Proxy
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation: Since the contracts are already deployed and initialized we didn’t create a new contract
**File(s) affected:**`ERC721/L1NFTBridg... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Depositing to the GMX POOl will return sub-optimal return if the Pool is imbalanced
### Description
Whenever A user deposits tokens to vault, vault create a leverage position depending[delta or delta neutral] in the GMX POOl. performing a proportional deposit is not optimal in every case and depositng token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Inaccurate Index Searching
### Description
## ERC1155TokensByAccountUpgradeable Overview
In `ERC1155TokensByAccountUpgradeable`, the `_tokensByAccount` mapping stores the token IDs and quantities associated with each address. The storage mechanism uses a dynamic array to store token IDs and quantities by push... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Hard-coded order version
### Description
In the [`Exchange` contract](https://github.com/mcdexio/mai-protocol-v2/blob/4b198083ec4ae2d6851e101fc44ea333eaa3cd92/contracts/exchange/Exchange.sol), the constant [SUPPORTED\_ORDER\_VERSION](https://github.com/mcdexio/mai-protocol-v2/blob/4b198083ec4ae2d6851e101fc44ea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Deprecated ETH Transfer Method May Prevent Validators From Being Registered
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The `ynETH.withdrawETH()` method is used by the `StakingNodesManager` contract in order to withdraw Ether and register a new validator which uses `payable(... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Business Logic | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-isomorph-judging/issues/161
## Found by
0x52
## Summary
The only way for a user to reduce their debt is to call closeLoan. If the amount repaid does not bring the user back above minOpeningMargin then the transaction will revert. This is problematic for users that ... | Sherlock | 4 | Isomorph |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Execution flow in _onlyWhiteListed modifier leaves modified function unexecuted
### Description
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The MasterPenPIe._onlyWhiteListed() modifier checks whether the sender is part of the AllocationManagers, PoolManagers, or is the contract owner. If any of... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [04] CALLING `ExtraordinaryFunding.proposeExtraordinary` AND `StandardFunding.proposeStandard` FUNCTIONS CAN REVERT AND WASTE GAS
### Description
Calling the following `ExtraordinaryFunding.proposeExtraordinary` and `StandardFunding.proposeStandard` functions will call the `Funding._validateCallDatas` function... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Updating set of active adapters does not always clear votes
### Description
Centrifuge governance has the ability to configure new sets of adapters, where quorum is always the length of this new set. When new adapters are enabled, the old ones are replaced but as long as the number of adapters does not decreas... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: Front running initial account data distribution
### Description
Report type: Blockchain/DLT
Target: https://github.com/shardeum/shardus-core/tree/dev
Impacts:
* Direct loss of funds
## Description
## Brief/Intro
Sending wrong initial account data information at the beginning of transaction processing c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: supplyController address changes result in orphaned balances
### Description
The `setSupplyController` function assigns a new supply controller without transferring the balance of the previous supply controller. There are currently no functions implemented to transfer PAX to the new supply controller without c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: [11] VULNERABILITIES IN VERSION 4.7.3 OF `@openzeppelin/contracts` AND `@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable`
### Description
As shown in the following code in `package.json`, version 4.7.3 of `@openzeppelin/contracts` and `@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable` are used. As described in https://security.snyk.io/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Signed Message May Be Replayed Across Chains
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `afb7e065f8d1d119c1415810ccddf31ba4fa5bcf`.
`block.chainid` is now included in the signatures.
**File(s) affected:**`CyanApeCoinPlan.sol`, `CyanPeerPlan.sol`, `CyanPrivateSales.sol`, `Paymen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `_releaseIntervalSecs` is not validated
### Description
_Submitted by sorrynotsorry_
VTVLVesting.sol has `_createClaimUnchecked` function to create the claims internally while validating parameters with the users' allocations.
However, `_releaseIntervalSecs` is not validated comparing to user's `_linearVe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Blast.claimYield() should revert when claiming more than the available amount
### Description
In `Blast.sol`, `claimYield()` doesn't check if the amount exceeds the contract's maximum claimable amount. The precompile at `YIELD_CONTRACT` handles this by transferring the claimable amount when the amount is large... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | NFT | true | false | ## Severity: High Risk
## Context
- SeaDrop.sol#L259-L266
- SeaDrop.sol#L318-L319
## Description
An allowed signer (SeaDrop.sol#L318-L319) can sign mints that have either:
- `mintParams.feeBps` equal to 0.
- A custom `feeRecipient` with `mintParams.restrictFeeRecipients` equal to false to circumvent the check at ... | Spearbit | 5 | SeaDrop |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: DoS by front-runnable externall call
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://explorer.zksync.io/address/0x4d9429246EA989C9CeE203B43F6d1C7D83e3B8F8
Impacts:
- Griefing (e.g. no profit motive for an attacker, but damage to the users or the protocol)
## Description
## Brief/Intro
EIP-2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Remove not needed custom error
### Description
The `MoreThanZero` custom error in `ArbitrumSwaps` is badly named and also duplicates the inherited from `StargateArbitrum` custom error `MustBeGt0` - prefer using the latter and remove the former. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: | Weak Tokenomics Protection
### Description
**Description**
The `MAX_ASSIGNER_CREDITS` and `MAX_CREDITS_ASSIGNED` offer little to no protection for the protocol tokenomics.
The `MAX_ASSIGNER_CREDITS` can be easily circumvented by simply calling the `addAssignerCredits` multiple times.
The `MAX_CREDITS_ASS... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Typos in code comments/names.
### Description
**Description**
Typos may confuse the user. The 'royalities' field has bad naming.
$programs/nft\_factory/src/lib.rs$
Line. 28.
**Recommendation**
'royalities' should be replaced with 'royalties'.
**Re-audit comment**
Resolved | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of Test Coverage
### Description
Full test coverage is an essential process in ensuring the codebase works as intended (outlined in NEAR’s design documentation). Insufficient code coverage may lead to the arisal of unexpected issues due to changes in the underlying smart contract implementation, leading t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: fulfillAdvancedOrder may revert and prevent order fulfillment
### Description
The functions `_getFraction` and `_locateCurrentAmount` are used in the execution of advanced orders to facilitate partial orders and the use of floating prices. The use of fractions or floating prices may cause arithmetic overflows in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: CollateralizationOracle - Fei in excluded deposits contributes to userCirculatingFei
### Description
`CollateralizationOracle.pcvStats` iterates over all deposits, queries the resistant balance and FEI for each deposit, and accumulates the total value of the resistant balances and the total resistant FEI. Any... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: INCREMENT/DECREMENT FOR LOOP VARIABLE IN AN UNCHECKED BLOCK
### Description
i++ involves checked arithmetic, which is not required. This is because the value of i is always strictly less than `length for (uint256 index = 0; index for (uint256 index = 0; index for (uint256 i = 0; i for (uint256 i = 0; i fo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: `borrow` lacks `has_one = user` constraint on `user_borrow_state`
### Description
_Resolved_
The `Borrow` accounts struct (`programs/solver-fund-pool-anchor/src/instructions/borrow.rs:109-128`) derives the user-specific state PDA with seeds `[USER_BORROW_SEED, user.key().as_ref()]`, but it never enforces that... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Dysfunctional `CToken._acceptAdmin` due to lack of function to assign `pendingAdmin`
### Description
_Submitted by rayn, also found by 0x1f8b, cmichel, and Sleepy_
[CToken.sol#L1379](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-dualityfocus/blob/main/contracts/compound_rari_fork/CToken.sol#L1379)
The implementat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: String alternative
### Description
**Description**
Consider using an enum instead of an array of strings for elements and avatar. Using string is always more vulnerable to management errors and takes up more memory.
Potential replacement variables:
File: AccessToken Contract.so
64: string private_oddAvatar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Missing Incident Response Plan
### Description
Thala lacks documented incident response procedures and playbooks. The lack of formal procedures increases the risk of delayed or ineffective response during time-critical situations, especially for incidents requiring different handling than past experiences.
W... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Possible Abortion Due to Integer Underflow
### Description
## Vulnerability in calculate_fungible_staked_sui_withdraw_amount
The vulnerability in `calculate_fungible_staked_sui_withdraw_amount` within `staking_pool` arises from the subtraction operation used to compute `total_rewards`. This calculation determ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Lack of Fallback Oracle
### Description
In `TransferPoolFeeCalculatorV2.sol`, the contract relies on the predefined oracle to detect a depeg event. However, on oracle failure, the contract may wrongly assume it happened. There is no secondary source of truth to verify the result. This may cause unavailability ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Redundant state management and inconsistency risk in `MarketplaceAdmin`
### Description
_Resolved_
The `MarketplaceAdmin` contract manages the `marketplaceAddress` and maintains a separate set of parameters, including variables like `acceptedCurrency`, etc.
This duplication of state management is not a bes... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Incentives May Become Locked in the System After Switching Incentive Tokens
### Description
The `setIncentive` function allows the owner to configure and update protocol incentives for a specific pool. It offers two scenarios:
- If the previous incentive round has ended, the entire configuration can be upda... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: The same signature can be used in different `distribution` implementation causing that the caller who owns the signature, can distribute on unauthorized implementations
### Description
The same signature can be used in different `distribute` implementations causing that the caller who owns the signature, to d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Stateful precompiles panic on empty calldata, which can be exploited to prevent finalizing outbound CCTXs
### Description
The precompile caller can pass invalid (empty) calldata, which results in a panic in the precompile. This immediately exits the EVM and propagates up to the Cosmos SDK baseapp. The Cosmo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: If AMO becomes primary depositor of Silo, user can force withdrawals to get inflated interest rates
### Description
This issue is the inverse of [H-01], where the SiloAMO can be forced to deposit additional funds, decreasing rates for borrowers until 1 day later when `update()` can be called again.
In this c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Validate Rules Missing Check
### Description
## Validate Rules Utility
In the `validate_rules` utility, the program allows `rules[i].num_assets` to be greater than 1 even if `rules[i].filter_by` is set as `FIXED_ASSET`. It can be seen in the code snippet below, that the `generate_weights` function adds uninit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Comprehensive Error Handling Review in Regulation Module Keeper
### Description
A thorough review of the regulation module's Keeper implementation reveals several instances of inadequate or missing error handling. These issues can lead to silent failures, unexpected behavior, or potential security vulnerabili... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Reward Has Two Meanings
### Description
## Severity: Low Risk
## Context
- `Divider.sol#L157-180`
- `Divider.sol#L334-414`
## Situation
Reward has 2 meanings:
1. Sum of all the fees in `Divider.sol`
2. COMP tokens in adapter
This might be confusing. Consider the following code snippet:
## Recommendation
C... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Members of withdrawal queue do not receive HIP3 fee
### Description
When fees are distributed using the `stakeFees()` function, the `_exGhostLST` supply is increased based on the stake amount, while new `exLST` tokens are not minted. As a result, the `exLST : _exGhostLST` rate decreases, and the Hype share of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | upgrade | true | false | ## Low: Cache storage to prevent identical storage reads
### Description
Reading from storage is expensive; cache storage to prevent identical storage reads:
* `contracts/wormhole/WormholeCCTPUpgradeable.sol`
```solidity
// cache `USDC` in `redeemUSDC`
65: uint256 beforeBalance = IERC20(USDC).balanceOf(address(... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `<array>.length` should not be looked up in every loop of a `for`-loop
### Description
The overheads outlined below are *PER LOOP*, excluding the first loop
* storage arrays incur a Gwarmaccess (**100 gas**)
* memory arrays use `MLOAD` (**3 gas**)
* calldata arrays use `CALLDATALOAD` (**3 gas**)
Caching t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Potential denial of service due to excessive gRPC message-length limit
### Description
The `mobilecoind-json` server sets a ~2 GB message-length limit for receiving and sending gRPC messages (figure 11.1). Setting such a big limit may allow an attacker to exhaust the server's memory by sending big requests ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Setting the root and child tunnel addresses can be front-run
### Description
The external [`setFxRootTunnel`](https://github.com/0xPolygon/fx-portal/blob/main/contracts/tunnel/FxBaseChildTunnel.sol#L37) and [`setFxChildTunnel`](https://github.com/0xPolygon/fx-portal/blob/main/contracts/tunnel/FxBaseRootTunnel.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | cross-chain | true | false | ## Gas: Use `assembly` to write address storage values
### Description
### Proof Of Concept
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-08-pooltogether/tree/main/pt-v5-cgda-liquidator/src/LiquidationPair.sol#L130
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-08-pooltogether/tree/main/pt-v5-cgda-liquidator/src/LiquidationPair.sol#L131... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: MISSING PARAMETERS VALIDATION
### Description
None
Code Location
-------------
### Recommendation
**SOLVED**: The code is now checking if the parameters are not zero. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Fixed gas low-level operations pose the risk of transaction failure
### Description
The use of `.call()` with a manually specified gas limit in functions: `DepositETH.executeWithdrawal()`, `DepositUSD.executeWithdrawal()`, and `StrategyManager.addStrategy()` may cause failures during execution. This design pos... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: Malicious borrower can evade full liquidation in `CDPVault::liquidatePosition` by repaying small amounts of debt
### Description
### Impact
In the `CDPVault::liquidatePosition` function, a liquidator can repay the total debt of a position to liquidate it, this can be achieved by calling the `CDPVault::virtua... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Risks associated with oracle outages
### Description
Under extreme market conditions, the Chainlink oracle may cease to work as expected, causing unexpected behavior in the Increment Protocol. Such oracle issues have occurred in the past. For example, during the LUNA market crash, the Venus protocol was exploi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Contracts should be refactored to extend a base contract with the common functionality
### Description
$ fgrep -xf NFTPair.sol NFTPairWithOracle.sol | wc -l
686
$ wc -l NFTPair.sol NFTPairWithOracle.sol
732 NFTPair.sol
754 NFTPairWithOracle.sol
686 / 732 = 93.7%
686 / 754 = 91.0%
About 92% of th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: IsDeposit() restriction can be bypassed
### Description
The `isDeposit()` view function has a restriction that causes it to revert when called by any contract other than `CrossL2Inbox`. However, this restriction can be circumvented using the following approach:
1. Create a wrapper contract that calls `validat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary redundant check for basisPoints
### Description
## Handle
0xRajeev
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The threshold check for basisPoints while a required part of input validation is an unnecessary redundant check because calcPart() does a similar upper bound check and the lower bound check on... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Position can be opened even when the particle position manger does not hold the Uniswap V3 Position NFT
### Description
As long as user approve the PositionManager for as a operator of their NFT position.
Even the particle position manager does not hold the Uniswap V3 NFT.
Anyone can open the position on ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: enforceExodusMode() naming
### Description
`AppStorage.sol` functions have the rule for naming of `enforce`+`{Rule}`.
Correct examples:
- enforceIsOwner()
- enforceIsGovernor()
Wrong example:
- enforceExodusMode()
It is wrong because in fact the code checks that the contract is not in the exodusMode:
So... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: Optimize external calls with Assembly for memory efficiency
### Description
Using interfaces to make external contract calls in Solidity is convenient but can be inefficient in terms of memory utilization.
Each such call involves creating a new memory location to store the data being passed, thus incurring mem... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Outdated Cargo dependency
### Description
## Audit Report
We performed our audit against commit `176b410` of Aob and commit `748aaf9` of Dex. However, this Dex commit uses an old version of Aob in `Cargo.lock`, namely commit `422b943`.
A number of bugs, fixed in later Aob commits, remained in Dex nonetheles... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.