prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: A hardcoded minimal liquidity might be insufficient for assets with higher token decimals
### Description
### Instances(1)
In ThrusterPair.sol, `MINIMUM_LIQUIDITY` is hardcoded as 1000. This minimum liquidity will be locked at the first deposit as a permanent supply. And also used to prevent initial dust depo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Lack of Epoch End Block Consideration in `pendingRewards` Function
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Unresolved
**Source**: LpNFTPool.sol
**Description**:
The `pendingRewards` function calculates the pending rewards for a staking position without considering the end of the epoch block ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Fees can be set up to 99.99%
### Description
An admin currently has the ability to set fees up to **99.99%**. This introduces the risk of excessive fees that may discourage platform use and harm users.
https://github.com/Liquorice-HQ/contracts/blob/a5b4c6a56df589b8ea4f6c7b8cb028b1723ad479/src/contracts/Reposi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Rearrange an expression in _calculateSwapInv to avoid underflows
### Description
In the following expression used in `SwapUtils_calculateSwapInv`:
```
ifxp[tokenIndexFrom] = x + 1
```
the expression would underflow and revert. We can arrange the expression to avoid reverting in this edge case:
```
dx = x - ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Committer not validated on withdraw claim and multi-paid claim
### Description
AutoClaim checks that the committer creating the claim request in `makePaidClaimRequest` and withdrawing the claim request in `withdrawUserClaimRequest` is a valid committer for the `PoolFactory` used in the AutoClaim initializer. T... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Constructor’s parameter order does not match specification
### Description
The order of the parameters of the `UniswapAnchoredView` contract’s constructor does not match the provided specification. In particular, according to the specification, the [parameter `anchorToleranceMantissa_`](https://github.com/comp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary Metadata Mapping
### Description
## AutographDynamicNFTOptionalMarketplaceFilteringNonUpgradeable.sol
In `AutographDynamicNFTOptionalMarketplaceFilteringNonUpgradeable.sol`, metadata is used to store the metadata for a token with `tokenId` as the key and its metadata as the value.
However, there... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `internal` functions only called once can be inlined to save gas
### Description
Not inlining costs **20 to 40 gas** because of two extra `JUMP` instructions and additional stack operations needed for function calls.
*There are 2 instances of this issue.* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Decimals | false | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-isomorph-judging/issues/46
## Found by
clems4ever, 0x52
## Summary
DepositReceipt_ETH and DepositReciept_USDC checks the value of liquidity by swapping 100 tokens through the swap router. WBTC is a good example of a token that will likely never work as LP due to th... | Sherlock | 5 | Isomorph |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Wrong argument in `TransferShares` event of `wrap()` function
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-ondo/blob/main/contracts/usdy/rUSDY.sol#L439
The third argument to the `TransferShares` event is expecting the amount of shares but it is wrongly called with `_USDYAmount`, which is the amount o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: BunniSwap swap functionality can cause panics during the swap
### Description
The swap functionality of BunniSwapMath can result in arithmetic underflow during the swap on a valid pool state, disrupting swap operations.
The `computeSwap` function in the BunniSwapMath library enables users to swap tokens on a v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Restrict timelock delay
### Description
## Timelock Delay Validation Issue
The `timelock_delay_seconds` governor parameter is missing the maximum delay check. As the `create_transaction_with_timelock` of the Goki smart wallet checks if the delay is below `goki::MAX_DELAY_SECONDS`, it is advisable to validate ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: | Duplicate Reads
### Description
**Description**
In `assignNamingCreditsBulk` the `numberOfCredits[i]` value is read up to five times upon each iteration. Declare a `uint creditNum` outside of the `for` loop and cache the `numberOfCredits` value in it upon each iteration.
**Recommendation**
Implement the a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: STORAGE COLLISION BETWEEN PROXY AND IMPLEMENTATION (LACK EIP 1967)
### Description
_Submitted by peritoflores_
Storage collision because of lack of EIP1967 could cause conflicts and override sensible variables
### Proof of Concept
contract CoreProxy is Ownable {
address private immutable _implement;
W... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: [01] Don't roll your own crypto
### Description
The general advice when it comes to cryptography is [don't roll your own crypto](https://security.stackexchange.com/a/18198). The Chainlink VRF best practices page says that in order to get multiple values from a single random value, one should [hash a counter a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Privileged Roles and Ownership
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> All the signer and pool controller permissions will be extensively explained in the user's documentation upon release. Slippage penalties are per-quote specific... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Potential Overflows in BondingCurve
### Description
Description
The operation totalTokensToSell**power appears in the functions _computePriceFromQuantity() and
getCurrentPrice() .
The expected decimal places of totalTokensToSell is18and the initial total supply is 1,000,000,000(1 billion).
AstotalTokensToSell ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Emit can be rearranged
### Description
The emit can be rearranged in the changeNoteAddress() and changeRevenueAddress() functions. With this arrangement, both the deploy time (`~1.4 k * 4 = 5.6k` gas per function) and every time the functions are triggered (~16 gas) gas savings will be achieved.
4 results - 2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: An unvalidated user input in the `_getAddLiquidityOneCoinCallData` function
### Description
The `_getAddLiquidityOneCoinCallData` function utilizes variable `i`, which is an arbitrary value passed by the user, without any validation from the `add_liquidity_one_coin` function. If this value is outside the valid... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inefficient Commission Accounting for Administrator and Market Maker
### Description
The [`transferCommissions`](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/09b6188e028650b9c1758010846080c5f8c80f8e/src/OnchainLOB.sol#L582) function updates commissions by modifying the `Trader` struct for both the adm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | true | ## Low: Protocol will leak value to users due to rounding in `RebasingLibrary`
### Description
Protocols should always round against users in favor of the protocol. `RebasingLibrary` uses "rounding to nearest" method which leaks value to users:
```solidity
// In convertTokensToShares
return (_tokens * DECIMALS_FACTOR ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Access Control Between `vBNB` and Other Core Pool vTokens
### Description
**Update**
The client has acknowledged the issue and commented: "This behavior is intended. We want to allow anyone to invoke the reduceReserves functions in the vBNB contract, to pull the reserves from the market and send t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Missing validation checks in timestampAt
### Description
- The function does not verify the ASN.1 tags (0x17 for UTCTime and 0x18 for Generalized-Time), which is crucial for determining the correct timestamp type.
- The function incorrectly uses the length of the timestamp data to determine its type, which ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: LeverageMacroBase 's _doCheckValueType() condition looks to be incorrectly reverted
### Description
Given the usage, say for the `debt >= minDebt` check in:
- LeverageMacroBase.sol#L175-L176
```solidity
_doCheckValueType(cdpInfo.debt, checkParams.expectedDebt);
_doCheckValueType(cdpInfo.coll, checkParams.ex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | true | ## High: Malicious User can call `lockOnBehalf` repeatedly extend a users `unlockTime`, removing their ability to withdraw previously locked tokens
### Description
### Impact
The protocol allows users to donate ether and/or tokens to another user via a `lockOnBehalf` function. This function lets the caller specify wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | logic | true | false | ## Medium: User wrapped tokens get stuck in master router because of incorrect calculation
### Description
Swapping exact tokens for ETH swaps underlying token amount, not wrapped token amount and this causes wrapped tokens to get stuck in the contract.
### Impact
User wrapped tokens get stuck in router contract. The... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: When Senior's TargetGain is negative, the tx will revert because the senior loss is not accounted for on the Junior Tranche as profit, causing the navs summation to not match the current nav
### Description
When `srtGainTarget < 0`, the code transfers senior loss to `jrtNavT0` *after* initializing `jrtNavT1... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Various events do not add the role as parameter
### Description
Note: During the audit, the client discovered an issue that affects their offchain infrastructure.
Various events do not emit the role as a parameter:
1. `event ActionCreated(uint256 id, address indexed creator, ILlamaStrategy indexed strategy, a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: Revert during price deduction
### Description
**Description**
CryptoBearWatchClub.sol:
dutchAuctionForPresale(), dutchAuctionForPublicMint() Auction length is limited because of
the expression “uint256 price = startingPrice - priceDeduction”
priceDeduction increases with time, thus it will reach the point wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Attacker can prevent user from executing application registered through `initFromToken()` in `AgentFactoryV4`.
### Description
### Finding description
`AgentFactoryV4` allowed user to register agent with existing/custom agent token. The flow is divided in two steps:
1. `initFromToken()`, where the user po... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Validator State Desynchronization
### Description
## Issue with Validator Removal and State Desynchronization
Removing validators immediately after a successful `EpochMaintenance` may result in the desynchronization of the internal state of the Steward Program with the external state of the stake pool valida... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [30] Fix typos
### Description
See [here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-08-axelar-network/blob/69c4f2c3fcefb1b8eb2129af9c3685a44ae5b6fe/interchain-token-service/contracts/interfaces/ITokenManagerType.sol#L9-L18).
### Recommended Mitigation Steps
Apply these changes: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Rent Transfer
### Description
## Vulnerability in CloseOrder
The vulnerability in CloseOrder arises from a logic flaw in how rent is handled during the closure of the `order_vault` account, specifically the `source_ta` account, which is the token account associated with the order vault.
When the m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Flawed Refund Mechanism During Deposits
### Description
To make a deposit, the user sends BTC to a `P2WSH` (Pay-to-Witness-Script-Hash) address, where the UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) can only be spent if either:
1. It's signed by both the BitHive contract's MPC signature and the user's BTC private key, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Outdated and inaccurate README file
### Description
The [README.md](https://github.com/AugurProject/augur/blob/9a33c3269e812d0cb66d49b61a72db58e32e4749/packages/augur-core/README.md) file in the augur-core repository is out of date and inaccurate. It does not reflect the v2 changes, some of the suggested comma... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Sometimes calculateBorrowerReward and calculateSupplierReward return incorrect results
### Description
Sometimes `calculateBorrowerReward` and `calculateSupplierReward` return incorrect results.
### Proof of Concept
Whenever a user wants to know pending rewards they call `getPendingRewards`; sometimes, it... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Lack Of Protection Policy Validation
### Description
When the CCCM begins the process of opening a protection policy, the `claimProtection` function requires the encoded protection information.
The protection policy data is initialized by encoding these parameters using the `encodeProtectionDataFromAbsoluteV... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Latency timelocks on certain functions can be bypassed
### Description
The functions `switchMaintainerFee()` and `switchWithdrawalBoost()` add a latency of typically three days to the current timestamp at which the new value is meant to be valid. However, they don’t limit the number of times this value can ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | ERC2981 | true | true |
Recipients of NFTs who accept royalties will not get their fair share of royalties. This is because royalties are calculated by dividing the sales price equally amongst all sold NFTs in that purchase. The issue with this is that it assumes all NFTs cost the same amount when it comes time to deal out royalties. If NFTs... | Code4rena | 5 | Caviar |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of path validation in the `Velodrome` adapter
### Description
The swap functions `swapExactTokensForTokens` and `swapDiffTokensForTokens` of `VelodromeV2RouterAdapter` accepts `routes` parameter with arbitrary consequences of routes, consisting of (`tokenIn`, `tokenOut`, `stable`, `factory`) parameters... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Validate the withdrawn amount by a staker is greater than zero
### Description
The `withdrawStakerFunds` function allows the stakers to withdraw their deposited amount of `stakeToken`; however, it does not validate that the amount to withdraw is greater than 0. This could allow users to spend gas unnecessarily... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Race condition in da/pkg/store/store.Persist() due to bug in RangeDB
### Description
This was already hypothesized in beacon-kit issue 3, but here's a more concrete example using `store.Persist()`, which uses explicit concurrency. The root cause of the bug is in `RangeDB`, not `Store`.
Put this in `beacon... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | token | false | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-surge-judging/issues/214
## Found by
0x52
## Summary
Pool#transferFrom attempts to use allowance even when spender = from. This breaks compatibility with a large number of protocol who opt to use the transferFrom method all the time (pull only) instead of using bot... | Sherlock | 5 | Surge |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [02] `Error.checkEnough` function does not prevent user from sending too many tokens to relevant contract
### Description
When calling functions like `TimeswapV2Option.mint` or `TimeswapV2Option.swap`, the user will use the callback function like `ITimeswapV2OptionMintCallback.timeswapV2OptionMintCallback` or ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: The result of a function call should be cached rather than re-calling the function
### Description
### WithdrawProxy.sol.claim(): Results of VAULT() and asset() should be cached (Saves 434 gas)
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-01-astaria/blob/1bfc58b42109b839528ab1c21dc9803d663df898/src/WithdrawProxy.sol#L2... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: The result of a function call should be cached rather than re-calling the function
### Description
External calls are expensive. Results of external function calls should be cached rather than call them multiple times. Consider caching the following:
### Proof Of Concept
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-0... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Centralisation Risks
### Description
The Rainbow Bridge is to act as a decentralised bridge between Ethereum and NEAR. There are some potential centralisation risks associated with the current design that could lead to one or a small number of actors exploiting the bridge for personal gain. If a user can add a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Rewards can be lost
### Description
_Submitted by csanuragjain_
Reward can be lost if bribeVault calls the updateRewardsMetadata on same rewardIdentifier again before user can claim his reward (since merkleRoot and proof will get updated).
### Proof of Concept
1. bribeVault calls the updateRewardsMetada... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Context Header in for merkle proof
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Location**: Airdrops.sol
**Description**
The function `claim()` in Airdrops.sol does not include a header to provide context of the proof (e.g. address(this), chain id, version) which can lead to potenti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `Heart::beat()` could be called several times in one block if no one called it for a some time
### Description
_Submitted by rvierdiiev, also found by datapunk, devtooligan, itsmeSTYJ, Jeiwan, Lambda, Trust, and zzzitron_
`beat()` function is allowed to be called by anyone once in `frequency()` period. The... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | MinOut/MaxIn Validation | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-bond-judging/issues/38
## Found by
bin2chen
## Summary
BondAggregator#findMarketFor() minAmountOut_ does not actually take effect，may return a market's "payout" smaller than minAmountOut_ , Causes users to waste gas calls to purchase
## Vulnerability Detail
BondAgg... | Sherlock | 3 | Bond Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Lack of access control allow anyone to `withdrawInterest()` for any lender
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
[LenderPool.sol#L442](https://github.com/sublime-finance/sublime-v1/blob/46536a6d25df4264c1b217bd3232af30355dcb95/contracts/PooledCreditLine/LenderPool.sol#L442)
`withdrawInterest()` at a ce... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Centrifuge router can perform untrusted actions on behalf of open vaults
### Description
The Centrifuge router enables several features such as multicall actions, permissionlessly claiming, ERC20 wrapping, and locking requests. In order to allow the router contract to perform certain actions to the vault, it ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Inconsistency In Uninitialized Stake Check
### Description
## LockedStake Implementation Issue
When a `LockedStake` instance is created via `LockedStake::default()` or when it is uninitialized (meaning its fields are set to their default values), several fields such as `stake_time` and `lock_duration` may be ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: Old stakers can steal deposits of new stakers in `StakingFundsVault`
### Description
Stakers to the MEV+fees vault can steal funds from the new stakers who staked after a validator was registered and the derivatives were minted. A single staker who staked 4 ETH can steal all funds deposited by new stakers.
#... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Loss of precision in `Staking.updateFor()` will make user to lose claimable amount.
### Description
Staking.updateFor() calculates claimable amount based on `_supplied * delta / 1e18`.
It might cause precision loss but `supplyIndex` is updated.
### Impact
If staking amount is small or `updateFor` is called ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use custom errors rather than `require()`strings to save deployment gas
### Description
**Description:**
Starting from Solidity v0.8.4,there is a convenient and gas-ecient way to explain to users why an operation failed through the use of custom errors.
**Recommendations:**
Use custom errors to save deplo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: Reentrancy at _requestLoan allows requesting a loan without supplying collateral
### Description
_Submitted by kenzo, also found by WatchPug, GimelSec, Czar102, and AuditsAreUS_
`_requestLoan` makes an external call to the collateral contract before updating the NFTPair contract state.
### Impact
If the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: [23] Commented code
### Description
### Proof Of Concept
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph/blob/main/contracts/enforcer/HolographERC721.sol#L527-L570
**[alexanderattar (Holograph) confirmed and commented](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-holograph-findings/issues/68#issuecomment-130943180... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Failed lockup error is never thrown
### Description
The locking contract function fails to signal an error in the return value, causing some error code to be unreachable.
The `LockupContractFactory` contract checks that a `lockContract` call has succeeded by checking the returned boolean. However, the lockup ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: Possible overflow on cast to uint
### Description
If `newStake` is a negative number, then overflow can occur: https://github.com/mixbytes/lido-dot-ksm/blob/76a10efa5f223c4c613f26794802b8fb9bb188e1/contracts/Lido.sol#L730
### Recommendation
We recommend checking overall diff in order to exclude such scenario... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: TribalChief - Governor decrease of pool’s allocation point should unlock depositors' funds
### Description
When the `TribalChief` governor decreases the ratio between the allocation point (`PoolInfo.allocPoint`) and the total allocation point (`totalAllocPoint`) for a specific pool (either be directly decreasi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Events with the same requestId can be emitted
### Description
There is a chance that the `UnstakeRequestCreated` event will be emitted several times with the same `requestId` https://github.com/TwoFiftySixLabs/mntEth/blob/bd15a96aee7df0fc0566d662df0cf50ff2619d31/src/UnstakeRequestsManager.sol#L175-L177.
### R... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: Kicked oDAO members’ votes taken into account Acknowledged
### Description
oDAO members can vote on proposals or submit external data to the system, acting as an oracle. Data submission is based on a vote by itself, and multiple oDAO members must submit the same data until a configurable threshold (51% by ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: RocketMinipoolDelegate - Sandwiching of Minipool calls can have unintended side effects
### Description
The `RocketMinipoolBase` contract exposes the functions `delegateUpgrade` and `delegateRollback`, allowing the minipool owner to switch between delegate implementations. While giving the minipool owner a ch... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Hedging assumptions
### Description
Hedging is only activated when crossing the ticks into active territory. If price stays on the
same side, the LMT order won't execute. This should be clearly stated as a limitation of the
reactor. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: IERC20 should be named IERC20Permit
### Description
File: erc20-1.0.0-beta.2/contracts/interfaces/IERC20.sol (lines [4-5](https://github.com/maple-labs/erc20/blob/10ccf4aa0b2d6914e3c2d32e454e4d106a99a4fd/contracts/interfaces/IERC20.sol#L4-L5))
There may be cases in the future where you may not want EIP-2612 f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Return values of ERC20 `transfer` and `transferFrom` are unchecked
### Description
_Submitted by shw, gpersoon, JMukesh, also found by a_delamo and cmichel_
In the contracts `BadgerYieldSource` and `SushiYieldSource`, the return values of ERC20 `transfer` and `transferFrom` are not checked to be `true`, wh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `claimReward()` does not trigger process fees
### Description
When `claimReward` is called, it does not trigger `_processFeesIfApplicable`, as a result, the claimed fee possibly does not include the latest amount of reward that can be collected by the `_wallet`. Consider to trigger `_processFeesIfApplicable` w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Repository does not contain dependency management of Smart contracts.
### Description
**Recommendation**:
initialize NPM project and define dependency to
Openzeppelin smart contracts package. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Arithmetic under�low in Slot::out_msg
### Description
Fuzzing `Node::handle_messages` produced an arithmetic underflow in `Slot::out_msg`, which could lead to undefined behavior. This finding describes one of several crashes that could not be ruled out by adding invariant checks to the start of `Node::handle_m... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack of input validation in native assets transfers function might lead to loss of funds
### Description
The `prepareNativeTransfer()` function from the `CeFiSmartTransfer` contract allows for operators to set the `NativeTransfer` struct, which contains all the crucial information to the native asset transfer ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Zero token allowance can cause denial of service in `applyRewards()`
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-09-asymmetry/blob/main/contracts/strategies/votium/VotiumStrategyCore.sol#L282-L285
During `applyRewards()`, token allowances are first reset to zero before being increased to infinity. Thi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: MISSING PARAMETER VALIDATION
### Description
The `childContractByIndex` and `childTokenByIndex` functions of the `ERC998TopDown` contract did not validate their parameters. Setting invalid values may result in reverts without error messages.
`contracts/NftfiBundler.sol`:
* The constructor of the contract doe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Protocol May Use Incorrect Prices
### Description
**Update**
The prices for tokens are now calculated from the return values from calls to GMX, which is essentially used as an oracle. We note that GMX is outside the scope of this audit. Additionally, no validation checks are made on the return value of functi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Multiple typos make GMIZap impossible to compile
### Description
The following errors prevent the `GMIZap` file from being used, as the compilation step always reverts:
```
Error (2558): Exactly one argument expected for explicit type conversion.
--> src/GMIZap.sol:58:25:
|
58 | require(name != bytes3... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Timestamp Tracking in RAACHousePrice contract
### Description
The RAACHousePrices contract tracks house prices and their update timestamps for each token ID. The contract uses a single global `lastUpdateTimestamp` variable for all tokens, causing the timestamp of previous token updates to be overwrit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | input-validation | false | false | ## Low: Additional validation should be performed on the Chainlink Functions response
### Description
When consuming a Chainlink Functions response, the following additional validation should be performed within `AutoRedemption::fulfillRequest`:
* Ensure the `_token` address is either a Hypervisor with valid data on t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Missing validation of snapshotId makes it possible for the investor to claim unlocked capitals from the same snapshot multiple times
### Description
Missing validation of snapshotId makes it possible for the investor/seller to claim unlocked capitals from the same snapshot multiple times
### Impact
- An inve... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | storage | false | false | ## High: 2. MISSING CONSTRAINT IN PIL LEADING TO PROVING FAKE INCLUSION IN THE SMT
### Description
**Severity:** Critical
**Path:** storage.pil
**Description:**
The Storage state machine uses SMT (Sparse Merkle Tree) and implements provable CRUD operations in conjunction with Storage ROM.
In order to prove the (Ke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | true | ## High: validateStack allows any stack to be used with collateral with no liens
### Description
The `validateStack` modifier is used to confirm that a stack entered by a user matches the `stateHash` in storage. However, the function reverts under the following conditions:
```solidity
if (stateHash != bytes32(0) && k... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Users can deflate other markets Guild holders rewards by staking less priced token
### Description
In the `SurplusGuildMinter::stake()` function, there is currently no check to verify if the provided term’s `CREDIT` token is the same as the `CREDIT` token in the called `SurplusGuildMinter`. This oversight c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Prevent execution with invalid signatures
### Description
_Submitted by gpersoon_
#### Impact
Suppose one of the supplied `addrs\[i]` to the constructor of `Identity.sol` happens to be 0 ( by accident).
In that case: `privileges\[0] = 1`
Now suppose you call `execute()` with an invalid signature, then `rec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Proposals do not have an expiration date
### Description
In the current architecture, proposals do not have an expiration date so they can be executed after a long period of time:
- https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/borg-core/blob/9074503d37cfa1d777ef16f6c88b84c98b4f54eb/src/implants/daoVetoGrantImplant.sol#L... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: An unsafe transfer
### Description
Some of the tokens do not revert on failed `transferFrom`. Also, there are some tokens with a fee on transfer, so the real transferred balance should be checked via `balanceOf()`, otherwise it could lead to funds insolvency.
https://github.com/FantiumAG/smart-contracts/blo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: `GnosisTargetDispenserL2` and `GnosisDepositProcessorL1` may be vulnerable to replay attacks
### Description
These contracts send messages to each other directly via the Arbitrary Messaging Bridge.
According to [Gnosis Chain's Security Considerations for Receiving a Call](https://docs.gnosischain.com/bridges/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: GMX Reward Router's claimForAccount() can be abused to incorrectly add WETH to tokensIn
### Description
When `claimFees()` is called, the Controller automatically adds WETH to the user's account. However, in the case where no fees have accrued yet, there will not be WETH withdrawn. In this case, the user wi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Auto redemption functionality broken by incorrect address passed to `SmartVaultV4::autoRedemption`
### Description
**Description:** `SmartVaultV4::autoRedemption` has the following signature:
However the invocation in `AutoRedemption::fulfillRequest` incorrectly passes the vault address in place of the swap... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Excessively High Borrow Rate Processed as Zero
### Description
This issue has been identified within the `accrueInterest` function, which checks whether the computed borrow rate exceeds `borrowRateMaxMantissa`. If it does, the function updates `accrualBlockTimestamp` and returns early:
```solidity
if (IInt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: BigDiv does not prevent overflow in some cases where it should ✓ Fixed
### Description
`BigDiv.vy` has been created with the aim of allowing calculations like `(a * b) / d` to succeed where an intermediate step (e.g. `a * b`) might overflow but the end result is ` 0`)
The chances of this issue being hit a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Insufficient Project Information in README.md
### Description
The project's [`README.md`](https://github.com/NethermindEth/forta-staking-vault/blob/ce87cffbf813e27cc83157933760b51fa44a1885/README.md) file currently lacks substantial content and provides no specific information about the project itself. It appe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | dos | true | false | ## Severity
**Impact**: High, Denial of service and high gas costs to users
**Likelihood**: Low, unprofitable due to bond submitted
## Description
The function `register` in `WorkerRegistration.sol` contract adds a new element to the `activeWorkerIds` array whenever a new worker is registered. There are no checks f... | Pashov Audit Group | 4 | Subsquid |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Valid Submissions Are Not Refunded Their Full Stake Value
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. The initial stake value is now refunded in full. Addressed in: `b5b04b152c4fdf421787571c2337495dfc0fd37c`.
**File(s) affected:**`BountyV1.sol`
**Description:** In `approveSubmission()`, th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Incorrect Fee checks
### Description
The functions `initiateBorrow` and `initiateRepay` implement fee checks incorrectly, allowing users to partially or entirely bypass required fees.
### Recommendation
- Modify the fee check condition in `initiateBorrow` to `transportFees >= fee + forwardFee`.
- Set the `re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Incompatibility with non-standard ERC20 tokens
### Description
The `RiskiitV1_1` contract uses direct calls to `transfer` and `transferFrom` functions of ERC20 tokens without proper checks on the return values or safeguards against non-standard implementations. This approach assumes all ERC20 tokens strictly f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `yVaultLPFarming.withdraw()`: L124 should be unchecked due to L119
### Description
See `@audit` tag: | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: USDT transfer is not safe
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
CommunityRound.sol, method: reserve(_request, _message, v, r, s), it is recommended as a best practice to use SafeERC20 to transfer ERC20 tokens. Failed, unchecked ERC20 transfers might lead to reserving f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: No SPDX-License-Identifier found
### Description
**Description**
Trust in smart contract can be better established if their source code is available. Since making
source code available always touches on legal problems with regards to copyright, the Solidity
compiler encourages the use of machine-readable SPDX... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Vault Accounting Inconsistency if Harvester Calls Delegator Functions Directly
### Description
**Update**
We reviewed the fix and confirmed that the team made the following changes to resolve the issue:
* `delegate()` function now transfers tokens from `msg.sender` instead of the vault
* The `withdraw()`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: `v4-integration.md` docs should be updated
### Description
_Resolved_
In `v4-intergration.md`, the [Example Workflow](https://github.com/napierfi/napier-v2/blob/dev/uniswap/docs/v4-integration.md#example-workflow) section, `Create new pool and add liquidity spending wstETH as initial liquidity` example, does ... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.