idm-eval / README.md
mihirma's picture
Link code repository in eval set card
a14117d verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
6.52 kB
---
license: mit
task_categories:
- video-classification
tags:
- inverse-dynamics
- screen-recording
- action-recognition
- macos
- vlm-benchmark
pretty_name: IDM Eval Set
size_categories:
- n<1K
---
# IDM Eval Set
![preview](./preview.gif)
A validation set for evaluating **Inverse Dynamics Models** on macOS screen recordings. Each sample is a 5-second clip of real productivity desktop usage (browser, IDE, terminal, docs, dashboards) paired with a ground-truth action log captured at the OS level.
The task: given a short screen recording, predict the sequence of user input actions (keypresses, mouse clicks, scrolls, cursor moves) that produced the observed screen changes.
## Code
Training, inference, and evaluation code is available at
[`p-doom/inverse-dynamics-model`](https://github.com/p-doom/inverse-dynamics-model).
## Dataset Structure
```
clips_recording_{uuid}_seg{N}/
clip_000_{tag}.mp4 # 5s screen recording (1728x1080)
clip_000_{tag}.json # ground truth action log
annotations.json # visibility labels per action
gt_overrides.json # manual corrections to GT details
gesture_gt_norm.json # per-frame mouse-move / scroll GT (0 to 1000 scale)
gesture_gt_exp.json # per-frame mouse-move / scroll GT (exponential bins)
```
## Stats
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Clips | 44 |
| Recordings | 10 |
| Total raw actions | 8,504 |
| Resolution | 1728 x 1080 |
| Clip duration | 5 seconds |
### Tag Distribution
| Tag | Count |
|-----|-------|
| scroll/drag | 15 |
| keystroke-heavy | 15 |
| click-heavy | 6 |
| hotkeys | 4 |
| mixed | 3 |
| hard-case | 1 |
## Baseline leaderboard
The table below provides reference scores for [p-doom/idm](https://huggingface.co/p-doom/idm) and off-the-shelf VLM baselines on this eval set. Scores use visibility filtering (`visible` + `inferable`) and action-type-specific matching. `MM R²` and `MM cos_mean` include missed MouseMove frames as zero predictions.
| Model | Overall F1 | KeyPress F1 | MouseClick F1 | MouseMove F1 | MouseScroll F1 | MM R² | MM cos_mean | MM cov. |
| ---------------- | ---------- | ----------- | ------------- | ------------ | -------------- | --------- | ----------- | ------- |
| **Ours (8B)** | **0.787** | 0.791 | 0.598 | **0.857** | **0.447** | 0.708 | 0.643 | **92%** |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0.740 | **0.826** | **0.726** | 0.760 | 0.337 | **0.714** | 0.560 | 64% |
| GPT 5.5 | 0.709 | 0.821 | 0.714 | 0.669 | 0.392 | 0.586 | 0.455 | 52% |
| Kimi K2.6 | 0.540 | 0.711 | 0.444 | 0.381 | 0.326 | 0.420 | 0.177 | 25% |
| Gemma 4 31B | 0.430 | 0.381 | 0.581 | 0.500 | 0.237 | 0.077 | 0.228 | 37% |
| Qwen3-VL 8B | 0.360 | 0.409 | 0.449 | 0.334 | 0.127 | -6.038 | 0.035 | 28% |
## Action Log Format
Each clip JSON contains:
```json
{
"start_s": 206.913,
"end_s": 211.913,
"tag": "keystroke-heavy",
"actions": [
[206933331, ["KeyPress", [32, "Space"]]],
[207233331, ["KeyRelease", [32, "Space"]]],
[208633331, ["MousePress", ["Left", 0, 0]]],
[209533331, ["MouseScroll", [0, -1, 0, 0]]]
]
}
```
**Details:**
* Timestamps are **absolute microseconds**. Subtract `start_s * 1e6` for clip-relative.
* Raw event types in the JSON: `KeyPress`, `KeyRelease`, `MousePress`, `MouseRelease`, `MouseMove`, `MouseScroll`, `ContextChanged`.
* For IDM evaluation, the canonical action set is `KeyPress`, `MouseClick`, `MouseScroll`, `MouseMove`. A `MouseClick` is derived from a `MousePress` event (its `MouseRelease` partner is discarded).
* `KeyPress` params: `[keycode, key_name]`.
* `MousePress` params: `[button, x, y]`. The `x`, `y` fields are always `0` in this version (cursor position is not stored on press events); only the button name is meaningful.
* `MouseScroll` params: `[dx, dy, x, y]`.
## Annotations
`annotations.json` contains manual visibility labels for each primary action (KeyPress, MousePress, MouseScroll) in each clip.
| Label | Count | Meaning |
|-------|-------|---------|
| `visible` | 479 | Effect is directly visible in the frames |
| `inferable` | 21 | Effect can be inferred but isn't directly visible |
| `ambiguous` | 25 | Action type is unclear from video (e.g. scroll via mouse vs keyboard) |
| `not_predictable` | 24 | Cannot be predicted from video alone |
**Format:**
```json
{
"clips_recording_.../clip_003_keystroke-heavy": {
"0": "visible",
"1": "inferable",
"2": "ambiguous",
"3": "not_predictable"
}
}
```
Use these to filter ground truth when scoring (e.g. exclude `not_predictable` and optionally `ambiguous` actions from recall calculations).
The eval set is strongly **visible-dominated**: the vast majority of annotated actions have a directly observable visual effect, so a competent IDM should be able to recover them from pixels alone without context inference.
## GT Overrides
`gt_overrides.json` contains manual corrections to ground-truth action details (e.g. when a modifier key was held from before the clip).
**Structure:**
```json
{
"clips_recording_.../clip_name": {
"edits": {"5": "Cmd+Tab"},
"deletions": [],
"additions": [{"frame": 8, "type": "KeyPress", "detail": "Space"}]
}
}
```
## Gesture GT (Mouse Movement + Scroll)
In addition to sparse event evaluation (KeyPress, MouseClick, MouseScroll), this dataset supports **gesture evaluation**: predicting per-frame mouse cursor movement and scroll magnitude.
* `gesture_gt_norm.json`: normalized 0 to 1000 scale, resolution-independent.
* `gesture_gt_exp.json`: signed exponential bin indices (one bin per magnitude order).
Both are derived from the raw `MouseMove` and `MouseScroll` events in each clip JSON. Mouse deltas are accumulated per frame (5fps), normalized by video resolution, then either kept as integers (norm) or binned (exp).
**Format:**
* `MouseMove` details: `"dx,dy"`. Positive dx = right, positive dy = down.
* `MouseScroll` details: signed scalar. Positive = scroll down (content moves up).
## Scope
This eval set is **productivity-focused**. It covers IDE, browser, terminal, docs, dashboards, and PDF reading workflows. Gaming and entertainment clips are intentionally excluded so the benchmark targets long-horizon digital-work behavior.