text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
B |
QX |
QX |
QX |
QO |
QO |
QO |
Net Freshwater Supply, QR |
Schematic diagram showing |
the components of the water |
and salt mass balances for A) |
a single estuarine basin in |
connection with the coastal |
ocean and B) additional |
fluxes introduced by flow and |
exchange among sub-basins |
within an estuarine basin. |
Conditions in any estuarine |
basin or sub-basin are |
characterized by its volume |
(equal to the product of its |
area A and average water |
depth d) and average salinity |
S. In case A, salinity in the |
single basin is maintained |
through water exchange with |
the coastal ocean at salinity |
SO. In case B, salinity in a subbasin is maintained by water |
exchange with adjacent |
basins and the ocean |
62 |
Overall the hydrology/salinity model captured well the patterns of spatial and |
temporal variability in salinity in Biscayne Bay. Calibration and verification statistics |
show that the box model accounts for greater that 70 percent of the variability in |
measured salinity. Calculated values agree with measurements made within the same |
week with an error of between 2 to 3 psu. Errors are comparable between the |
calibration and verification time periods and are comparable to results achieved in the |
previous box model study. |
Fig 4.2: Spatial structure of the nutrient box-model. |
When the model was used for nutrient mass balance calculations (step 4), the |
results showed varied success at characterizing the link between nutrient loads and |
concentrations in the Bay. Average values for TP concentrations assuming no loss or |
SB1 |
SB2 |
2 |
4 6 5 |
7 |
8 |
SB1 |
SB1 |
SB1 |
S197 |
S26, S25, S25B |
G93, S22, |
S123 |
S21, S21A, |
S20G, S20F |
X18 |
X15 |
X0 |
X5 |
X17 |
Canal discharge |
Net discharge |
3 |
1 |
9 |
X16 |
X12 X13 X14 |
X11 X9 X10 |
X4 |
X8 |
X7 |
X6 |
X2 X3 |
1 β Miami River (boundary) |
2 β North Central Inshore |
3 β North Central Outer-bay |
4 β South Central Inshore |
5 β South Central Mid-bay |
6 β South Central Outer-bay |
7 β Card Sound |
8 β Barnes Sound |
9 β Manatee Bay |
X1 |
S20 |
Schematic diagram of the structure of the Biscayne Bay |
nutrient box model showing canal discharges, exchanges |
(quantified by parameters X1, X2, β¦), and net discharge |
between the boxes. Salinity boundary conditions for the |
Atlantic Ocean SB1 and northeast Florida Bay SB2 are |
indicated |
63 |
transformation of TP exceeded average measured values by between 17 and 44 |
percent. Of particular interest, the calculated values of TP concentration reflect the |
effect of very large loadings of TP caused by hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in |
2005 and Ernesto in 2006. Average values for NOx-N concentrations without |
accounting for losses due to net denitrification greatly exceed average measured |
values. Calculated values are between about 1.5 and 4 times higher than measured |
values. The disparity between calculated and measured values indicates the degree to |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.