text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
Miami River/Government Cut: The recommended approach (Community |
Index) rated highest at 20 with a range of values from 5-20. This approach |
utilizes a biodiversity index similar to that developed by Berkely and Campos |
(1984) for the Bay. |
Central Biscayne Bay: The recommended approaches (Indicator Species and |
Valued Ecosystem Component) both rated highest at 22 with a range of values |
from 5-22. The Indicator Species approach was judged the better of the two by |
the principal scientists, and the species chosen were pink shrimp and shoal grass. |
South-Central Biscayne Bay: The recommended approach (Valued Ecosystem |
Component) rated highest at 22 with a range of values from 5-22; the VEC being |
a sustainable pink shrimp harvest. |
Southern Biscayne Bay: The recommended approach (Food Web Support) |
rated highest at 26 with a range of values from 5-26. The intent is that the forage |
fish food base be sustained to support: (1) nesting productivity for the Roseate |
Spoonbill (and several other wading bird species) and (2) high survival of first |
year juveniles of the American crocodile, as the target reference points. |
Table ES-1 |
Comparison of the Relative Strength of Scientific Support for the |
Different MFL Approaches for Each Sub-region |
Oleta River |
Snake Creek |
Northern |
Biscayne Bay |
Miami River |
Gov't Cut |
Central |
Biscayne Bay |
South-Central |
Biscayne Bay |
Southern |
Biscayne Bay |
2 2 4 |
Relative Strength of |
Scientific Support (0-5) 2 3 2 |
Soil Characteristics |
Requirement for preferred |
fish communities |
Food Web Support |
Sub-Region |
Pre-development Scenario |
Valued Ecosystem |
Component(s) |
Community Index |
Indicator Species |
POTENTIAL APPROACHES |
Presence/Absence/Vitality |
of Preferred Habitats |
Ecological Preservation |
22 22 |
17 |
14 8 |
17 |
21 |
12 |
15 |
16 |
22 15 |
6 |
18 18 16 |
22 |
17 |
14 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 12 6 |
5 |
12 20 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
6 |
15 11 |
5 |
22 16 |
13 |
26 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
12 |
5 |
10 |
Shaded bocks indicate the recommended approach for each sub-region, based on it receiving the highest ranking. |
It is important to note that these values represent a composite of multiple factors (see Appendix E). |
12 |
15 |
5 |
10 |
12 |
12 12 |
12 |
12 |
Introduction |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 1-1 |
SECTION 1 |
INTRODUCTION |
PROJECT BACKGROUND |
The State of Florida has adopted regulations (Section 373.042 Florida Statutes), |
which require that Water Management Districts identify priority water bodies, |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.