text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
Mazzotti, 1989). |
American crocodiles forage primarily from shortly before sunset to shortly |
after sunrise. Juveniles typically eat fish, crabs, snakes, and other small |
invertebrates. Adults eat fish, crabs, snakes, turtles, birds and small |
mammals (Ogden 1978b, Ross and Magnusson, 1989). |
Field data collected from Florida Bay, Dunson (1982) documented that |
although American crocodile hatchlings are intolerant of 35 ppt water, his |
laboratory studies indicated that most small American crocodiles maintained |
body mass at salinities up to 17 ppt, and some even gained mass at 26 ppt. |
Kushlan (1988) suggests that hatchling crocodiles possess a number of |
behavioral adaptations for survival in hypertonic conditions, including |
consuming water-laden prey items, drinking freshwater from pools and |
lenses riding on top of salt water and avoidance of salt uptake. Also |
regarding salinity preferences and tolerances, USFWS (1999) states that: |
"Water salinity affects habitat use and may be locally important, |
especially during periods of low rainfall. Although American |
crocodiles have salt glands that excrete excess salt and physiological |
mechanisms to reduce water loss...maintenance of an osmotic balance |
requires access to low salinity for juveniles. Hatchling crocodiles are |
particular susceptible to osmoregulatory stress and may need to have |
brackish to fresh water (4 ppt) available at least once per week to |
increase growth (Mazzotti et, al. 1986). Crocodiles larger than 200 g |
have sufficient mass to withstand osmoregulatory stress and are not |
typically believed to be affected by drought (Mazzotti and Dunson |
1984). Freshwater needs of the crocodile are usually met with frequent |
rainfall, which results in a “lens” of fresh water on the surface for |
several days after rainfall (Mazzotti and Dunson 1984). Hatchling |
crocodiles are probably stressed and occasionally die during periods of |
low rainfall. Anthropogenic changes in the amount and timing of |
fresh water flow to South Florida may have resulted in shifts in the |
distribution of American crocodiles.” |
Estimates of the population of crocodiles in South Florida suggest that from |
historical numbers of 1,000 to 2,000, numbers dropped to all-time lows during |
the 1960s and 1970s during which it is thought that there were between 100 |
and 400 non-hatchlings (USFWS 1999.), and that numbers have increased |
substantially since that time. |
Valued Ecosystem Components |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 4-14 |
The most recent surveys for crocodiles in Biscayne Bay which are reflected in |
publications were performed by Mazzotti and Cherkiss (1998) pursuant to a |
contract with the SFWMD. Surveys were conducted from September 1996 |
through May 1998. During that period, a total of 132 crocodile observations |
were made. Sightings ranged from Chapman Field and the Coral Gables |
Waterway at the north to the U.S. 1 corridor and the Crocodile Lakes National |
Wildlife Refuge on Key Largo at the south. Figure 11 shows the locations and |
comparative numbers of crocodile sightings and captures as reported by |
Mazotti and Cherkiss (1998). Surveys did not include the cooling canal |
system at Florida Power and Light Company’s Turkey Point Power Plant, an |
area long known for its population of crocodiles. |
Limited water quality data were recorded at the locations of observations. |
Although salinities varied from 0 ppt to nearly 40 ppt, 45% of all nonhatchling crocodile observations were in water with salinity measurements of |
0-5 ppt (Figure 12). In discussion of their findings, Mazzotti and Cherkiss |
(1998) state that: “Crocodiles benefit from restoration and maintenance of |
freshwater flows into the estuarine habitat. Location, timing, and amount of |
flow are important. For example, when possible freshwater flows should be |
directed through the remaining fringing mangrove swamp rather than simply |
discharged through canals. In general flow should peak at the end of the |
rainy season and continue discharging into the dry season. Freshwater flow |
should be adequate to maintain estuarine conditions (< 20 ppt salinity) into |
December in most years.” |
USFWS (1999) corroborates that “The timing and frequency of the freshwater |
hydroperiod substantially influences the health of the estuarine environment |
in South Florida and may be one of the most important large-scale factors |
influencing crocodile populations on the mainland”. |
Roseate Spoonbill |
The Roseate Spoonbill (Ajaia ajaja), a brightly-colored, long-legged wading |
bird with a spatulate bill, is the only spoonbill native to the western |
hemisphere. It has been designated as a ‘Species of Special Concern’ by the |
State of Florida. Although it is protected pursuant to the federal Migratory |
Bird Treat Act, this species is not protected pursuant to the federal |
Endangered Species Act. No recovery plan has been developed and there is |
no designated critical habitat for this species. |
Figure 11 |
Locations of Crocodile Sightings and Captures |
Source: Mazotti and Cherkiss, 1998. Status and Distribution of the |
American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) in Biscayne Bay |
Figure 12 |
Crocodile Sightings in Relation to Salinities |
Source: Mazotti and Cherkiss, 1998. Status and Distribution of the |
American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) in Biscayne Bay |
Valued Ecosystem Components |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 4-17 |
Accounts of historical populations suggest that the spoonbill population in |
the United States numbered in the thousands prior to the 1850s, after which a |
rapid decline occurred. This decline, which was attributed to the disturbance |
of colonies, plume hunting and collection of nestlings and adults for food and |
which occurred between 1850 and 1920, reduced the nationwide population |
to approximately 25 pairs (Allen 1942). By 1941, only one nesting colony |
(Bottle Key) was known to exist in Florida (Lorenz et. al., 2002). Populations |
began to rebound, however after protection mechanisms were enacted, |
particularly in coastal Texas and Louisiana, and estimates were that 2,200 to |
2,700 nesting individuals existed in the 1970s. |
Presently, although there are several widely-spaced individual nesting sites |
in other coastal areas in the southern half of peninsular Florida, the primary |
nesting areas for this species are in extreme south Florida. Ninety percent of |
spoonbill nesting in Florida has been on mangrove islands in Florida Bay in |
Everglades National Park, although a colony was recently documented to |
occur in coastal areas west of the mangrove shoreline in southern Biscayne |
Bay (Lorenz, pers. comm.). Lorenz et al. (2002) report that in recent years |
there have been more than 30 islands in Florida Bay with spoonbill nesting |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.