text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
reduces turbidity and erosion. |
The federal recovery team identified five criteria on which to consider |
designation of critical habitat: 1) populations that have been documented to |
persist for 10 or more years; 2) persistent flowering populations; 3) the |
northern and southern limits of the species range; 4) unique genetic diversity; |
and 5) a documented high abundance compared to other areas in the species’ |
range. Based on these criteria, ten areas, ranging in size from approximately |
2 acres to 18, 757 acres have been designated as critical habitat for Johnson’s |
seagrass. The largest of these, and the only one to occur within the MFL |
project area is the Biscayne Bay area, which accounts for 83% of the |
designated critical habitat for this species (Figure 8). |
The recovery plan identifies a number of actions that are to be taken place in |
order to meet the recovery goal of delisting the species after assuring its |
persistence throughout its range. Although implementation of many of the |
identified actions will have no effect on MFL rule development, specific |
activities that are worth monitoring include: |
Valued Ecosystem Components |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 4-32 |
Action #2: Initiate a range-wide monitoring program. Monitoring is to be |
performed to detect any changes in the southern distributional limits or range |
extensions, and specifically; “An important goal of the initial mapping would |
be to identify if any major distributional gaps presently exist in the southern |
part of the range.” (NMFS2002). |
Action #3: Refine habitat requirements. Data are to be collected regarding |
various water quality parameters, including temperature, salinity, light |
intensity… to increase understanding of the conditions in which Johnson’s |
seagrass survives. |
Action #5: Determine and implement habitat management needs and |
techniques. The recovery team intends to work with FDEP and WMDs to |
develop water quality based targets for use in protecting seagrass |
populations. WMDs will develop Pollutant Load Reduction Goals (PLRGs) |
for SWIM waters. FDEP will use these PLRGs to determine Total Maximum |
Daily Loads (TMDLs) for waters that are on the State’s list of impaired |
waters. |
Oysters |
This summary of American oyster biology related to salinity is formatted after |
that of Meeder et al. (2001) with additional review information from Galtsoff |
(1964), Castagna and Chanley (1973), Lough (1975) Bahr (1981) and Burrell |
(1986). |
While live oysters have been collected across their range at temporary salinities |
ranging from 0 psu to 40 psu, the various life stages of the oyster each has |
different optimum requirements: Egg and sperm production does not occur |
below salinities of 7.5 psu, maximum survival of 2 day old larvae occurs at |
salinities of 19-30 psu, and 10 day larvae at 8-30.5 psu. Temperature is another |
important parameter and certain optimums are reported for various populations. |
Larval development is optimum at 25-29 psu, and spat grow best at 15-26 psu. |
Best adult growth is in the same range, 14-30 psu. Moderate salinities of less |
than 15 psu for a significant period in the year may be beneficial through |
exclusion of less euryhaline predators and reduction in common disease |
organisms (Burrell 1986). |
Oysters can close their shells and survive on stored reserves and apparently |
carry out anaerobic respiration to avoid death when external conditions are |
lethal, such as long periods of 0 psu salinities. Periods of closure can range up to |
Valued Ecosystem Components |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 4-33 |
10 days. In his review of requirements for establishment and persistence of |
oysters as oyster bars, Meeder et al. (2001) notes that salinity and “steady food |
bearing water currents are essential.” Oysters are very specific suspension |
feeders, filtering seawater for phytoplankton. Evidence shows they can be very |
specific for certain phytoplankton groups or even species. |
Oyster larvae settle from a planktonic life form onto many surfaces. Galtsoff |
(1964) describes these as “…rocks, gravel, cement, wood, shells of other |
mollusks, stems and leaves of marsh grass…tin cans, rubber boots,… tires, glass, |
tar paper…plastic…There is no evidence that the larvae are selective in finding a |
suitable place to set, provided the surface is not covered with slimy film, detritus |
or soft mud.” The latter two are however common features in certain areas along |
the west side of Biscayne Bay where historical oyster bar deposits are found. |
Meeder et al. (2001) concluded that "a range of salinities of 5-20 psu…may be |
optimal for C. virginica in South Florida” and proposed a target salinity range for |
a tidal creek restoration project of 5-15 psu in the wet season and 10-19 psu in the |
dry season. The existing salinities in the area have a mean of 15 psu in the wet |
season and 25 psu in the dry season. |
For this restoration project specific construction activities and freshwater flows |
were recommended along with the addition of several barge loads of shell to |
provide a base for a new oyster reef to overcome the problem of needing suitable |
settling substrate for oyster larvae (Meeder et al 2001, 2002). |
Crustaceans |
Crustaceans, which include lobsters, shrimp, crabs and barnacles are mostly |
aquatic arthropods that are categorized in the class Crustacea. Numerous |
species of crustaceans inhabit Biscayne Bay. Most are marine organisms that |
prefer typical marine salinities of + 35 ppt, and are species whose presence, |
absence and/or abundance would not serve as good indicators of adverse |
impacts associated with reductions of inflow of fresh water. Many individual |
species tolerate wide variations in salinity. Several species, however which are |
present in Biscayne Bay for all or portions of their life cycles could potentially |
serve as indicators of desired salinity regimes. These include shrimp and crabs |
(Order Decapoda), as described hereafter. In addition to having life cycles that |
include estuarine waters (see Appendix C), several of these species (i.e., pink |
shrimp, blue crab and stone crab) are recognized as being “of major importance |
to commercial, sport or bait fisheries” (Idyll, 1966). |
Valued Ecosystem Components |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 4-34 |
Shrimp |
Shrimp found in Florida’s coastal areas include members of the Penaeidae, |
which include pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus duorarum), and brown shrimp |
(Farfantepenaeus aztecus) and members of the Palaemonidae, which include |
grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio). Of the several kinds of shrimp that are |
documented to occur in Biscayne Bay, pink shrimp are the most abundant |
(Cantillo, et. al., 2000). Grass shrimp, which are known to inhabit |
Biscayne Bay are well documented to be able to withstand wide ranges of |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.