text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
will have already occurred. |
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES |
These nine approaches have been individually evaluated by sub-region of the |
Bay for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, speed of information |
return to managers for adaptive management decisions, and cost effectiveness of |
potential performance standards. Tables D-1 to D-6 list the nine alternatives |
considered for use for each of the six sub-regions, with values established on a |
scale of 0-5 by best-professional-judgment by the BFA Team combined with |
knowledge derived from the reviewed literature, and comments by interviewees |
to the principal scientists. The six values were then added together for a final |
score. The minimum score could therefore be 0, and the maximum 30. Table 5 |
lists the results of all of the analyses and shows that for each sub-region the |
following approaches had the highest ratings: indicator species (Oleta and |
Northern, Score 22 for both), community index (Miami River, Score 20), VECs |
and indicator species tied for Central Biscayne Bay (Scores 22), VECs (South |
Central, Score 22) and food web support (Southern, Score 26). |
Table 5 |
Comparison of Different MFL Approaches for Each Sub-region |
Oleta River |
Snake Creek |
Northern |
Biscayne Bay |
Miami River |
Gov't Cut |
Central |
Biscayne Bay |
South-Central |
Biscayne Bay |
Southern |
Biscayne Bay |
Shaded bocks indicate the recommended approach for each sub-region, based on it receiving the highest ranking. |
It is important to note that these values represent a composite of multiple factors (see Appendix E). |
12 |
15 |
5 |
10 |
12 |
22 16 |
13 |
26 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
12 |
5 |
10 |
12 12 |
12 |
12 12 |
12 |
6 |
15 |
12 6 |
5 |
12 20 |
12 |
11 |
5 |
14 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
22 15 |
6 |
18 18 16 |
22 |
17 |
Ecological Preservation 14 |
22 22 |
17 |
14 8 |
17 |
21 |
12 |
15 |
Soil Characteristics |
Requirement for preferred |
fish communities |
Food Web Support |
Sub-Region |
Pre-development Scenario |
Valued Ecosystem |
Component(s) |
Community Index |
Indicator Species |
POTENTIAL APPROACHES |
Presence/Absence/Vitality |
of Preferred Habitats |
Recommendation of Preferred Approaches |
Freshwater Flow and Ecological Relationships in Biscayne Bay 6-1 |
SECTION 6 |
RECOMMENDATION OF PREFERRED APPROACHES |
The recommended approach to establishing minimum flows and levels for |
Biscayne Bay is to utilize a different approach for each of the six sub-regions of |
the Bay. Biscayne Bay is a large heterogeneous ecosystem that has undergone |
major anthropogenic changes in the last 100 years. Thus each of the sub-regions |
has unique characteristics that demand unique treatment regarding necessary |
freshwater flows to either maintain existing conditions, or restore some |
semblance of historical conditions to allow for a particular ecological function to |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.