text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
High Relevance |
Other Categories: Animal Species Aquatic Plants/Habitat Ecological Indicators |
Impact Approach Water Quality Data Hydrologic Data |
Publisher: |
Biscayne Bay |
Author: Zimmer-Faust, R.K. and M.N. Tamburri Date: 1994 |
Title: Chemical identity and ecological implications of a waterborne, larval settlement cue |
Publication: Limnology and Oceanography 39: 1075-1087 |
High Relevance |
Other Categories: Animal Species Aquatic Plants/Habitat Ecological Indicators |
Impact Approach Water Quality Data Hydrologic Data |
Publisher: |
Biscayne Bay |
100 |
APPENDIX B |
TASK 3 REPORT |
INTERVIEWS WITH EXPERTS |
SUMMARY OF TASK 3 |
CONTACTS AND EXPERTS INTERVIEWS |
FOR THE PROJECT |
FRESHWATER FLOW AND ECOLOGICAL |
RELATIONSHIPS IN BISCAYNE BAY |
BY |
BARNES FERLAND AND ASSOCIATES, INC. |
AND SUBCONSULTANTS |
APPLIED TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, INC. |
LEWIS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. |
SOUTH FLORIDAWATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT |
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA |
NOVEMBER, 2003 |
1 |
INTRODUCTION |
The State of Florida has adopted rules for Water Management Districts to establish Minimum |
Flows and Levels (MFLs) for identified priority water bodies and to implement these MFLs |
through water shortage plans and or the water use permitting process. Specifically, Biscayne |
Bay has been identified as a priority water body in which MFLs must be developed by the |
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) by December, 2004. |
As one component of the SFWMD efforts to establish MFLs for Biscayne Bay, the SFWMD |
issued a work order to undertake a study titled, Freshwater Flow and Ecological |
Relationships in Biscayne Bay. SFWMD entered into an agreement to with the consultant |
team of Barnes, Ferland and Associates, Applied Technology Management, Inc. and Lewis |
Environmental Services, Inc. to conduct the necessary activities to complete this project. |
The overall objectives of this project are to assist District staff with identifying significant |
harm and with development of the technical criteria for the Biscayne Bay MFLs, including: |
· Performing an intensive review and documentation of existing literature and information |
to determine the technical relationships among freshwater flow, salinity and |
watershed/estuary hydrodynamics that impact key indicator biological communities or |
species present throughout Biscayne Bay; and |
· Evaluating approaches that can be used to develop the MFLs significant harm technical |
criteria. |
This summary of interviews with experts is part of the overall project scope and is presented |
in fulfillment of the requirements of Task 3 – Contacts and Experts Interviews as detailed in |
Contract No. C-15967-WO04-06. In this task, members of the project team have interviewed |
and obtained information and data from local contacts and experts in the areas of |
estuarine/marine water chemistry, phytoplankton, zooplankton, algae, seagrasses, |
invertebrates, fisheries, ecology, and paleoecology. In completing these interviews, the |
project team has: |
· Confirmed the literature review information and obtained recommendations for additions |
to the literature database (which were subsequently incorporated into the Task 2 |
bibliography), |
· Identified additional recent and/or ongoing relevant research and data collection, and new |
information, and |
· Identified additional sources of information (i.e., unpublished documentation, personal |
opinion, etc.) regarding ecological dependencies on freshwater in Biscayne Bay or other |
south Florida estuaries and/or other estuaries where such information could be helpful. |
The SFWMD provided an initial list of recommended contacts/interviewees that were to be |
contacted regarding the project purpose and to discuss project aspects. It was acknowledged |
in initial meetings between SFWMD and the project team that this list would serve as an |
2 |
initial basis, that completing interviews with all of these individuals within the project |
schedule may not be possible, that some potential interviewees may not have the time or |
inclination to participate, and that, as the project progressed, additional and/or substitute |
interviewees would be identified. Table 1 identifies experts that were contacted and their |
respective areas of expertise. Attachment A provides a summary of the interview process. |
An interview form (Attachment B) was developed to ensure consistency in covering the |
requested topics and/or aspects of the project in each interview. Interviews were conducted |
by senior ecologist project team members Robin Lewis and Greg Braun, during September |
and October, 2003. Some interviews were conducted in person, while others by telephone. |
The following provides a summary of these interviews and the general findings. |
It is important to note that the majority of the information that follows may not represent the |
opinions and/or conclusions of the project team or the SFWMD; it merely recounts the |
essence of the opinions, comments and suggestions of the various interviewees. In several |
circumstances, the interviewee(s) provided comments and/or suggestions that, while |
pertinent to the overall issue of MFLs for Biscayne Bay, may not have been directly related |
to the interviewer’s tasks of identifying indicator species, suites of indicators of ecosystem |
health and/or significant harm. In some cases, information regarding these tangential issues |
is included in the interview summaries, in order for the District to be aware of the opinions of |
the interviewees. Ultimately, it will be the responsibility of the project team to evaluate these |
comments and suggestions in relation to the team’s scope of work. Then, with consideration |
of the information gleaned from the Task 2 Literature and Data Review, the team will use its |
best professional judgment to identify potential MFL approaches, recommend a preferred |
approach and finally, in the fifth and final task, summarize the information and identify |
potential information needs. |
SUMMARY OF INTERVIEWS WITH EXPERTS |
The interview summaries are organized alphabetically by agency/entity within the following |
three major categories: Governmental Entities, Academia, and Other Non-Governmental |
Organizations. |
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES |
Florida Department of Environmental Protection |
Interviewees: Daniel Apt, Stacey Feken (participated by conference call), Marsha Colbert |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.