text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
of oysters in historical ranges is a key target that should drive the MFL process. |
FWS is charged with ensuring compliance with the federal Endangered Species Act |
(ESA), and as such, he is working on developing a “Programmatic Biological Opinion” that |
will identify all federally-listed endangered and threatened species that could be affected by |
CERP projects. He indicates that additional analysis in this regard will need to be done as |
individual CERP projects are designed and permitted. He suggests that there are several |
11 |
federally-listed aquatic organisms that should be given specific attention during MFL rule |
development, due to the additional protection afforded to them under the ESA. Species that |
came immediately to mind, include crocodiles, manatees, smalltooth sawfish, and Johnson’s |
seagrass, but suggests that consideration should be given to other federally listed species that |
are known to occur within the project area (e.g., indigo snakes, panther, bald eagle). |
Mr. Pitts identified that, in addition to oysters, there is an existing target of attempting |
to restore the historical transition zone from Everglade-type shallow freshwater sheet flow |
though an Eleocharis and graminoid marsh to mangroves and Ruppia/Halodule grass beds to |
the more hypersaline Thalassia beds and offshore reefs. He suggests that any MFL rule |
adopted include a strategy to re-evaluate flows, levels and water quality as additional |
research is completed and as CERP projects come on line. He provided copies of several |
documents that he thinks will be helpful, including Hill and Cichra (UF paper on Effects of |
water levels on Fish Populations), Reservations of Water for the Environment, Effects of |
freshwater canal discharges on fish assemblages, and S. Fl Ecological Report. |
U.S. Geological Survey |
Interviewee: Dr. Guillermo Diaz. Interviewee: G. Braun. Interview date: October 10, |
2003. |
Dr. Diaz was interviewed based on his many years of working with pink shrimp in |
Biscayne Bay. He currently works for U.S.G.S., but his job responsibilities are not related to |
anything that would be helpful in the Biscayne Bay MFL project. Although he is not familiar |
with the MFL program, after discussion of its objectives and goals, he advised that, in his |
opinion, pink shrimp would not be a good indicator species for MFLs in Biscayne Bay. He |
bases this decision both on the species’ wide salinity tolerances and nearly constant |
recruitment from the Dry Tortugas area. Although he encountered other species of shrimp in |
his work, he really doesn’t know of their salinity tolerances or life cycles, nor does he know |
of anyone who is studying them. His only suggestion for another individual species that |
might be a good indicator is oysters, but doesn’t know of any oysters currently in Biscayne |
Bay. Regarding suggestions for other individuals who might be helpful in this regard, he |
suggested J. Browder and J. Serafy, both of whom are already on our contact list. |
U.S. Geological Survey (Continued) |
Interviewee: Dr. Michael Robblee. Interviewer: G. Braun. Interview date: October 21, |
2003. |
Dr. Robblee is currently working with J. Browder on a fisheries study in southern |
Biscayne Bay, centered near Mowery canal. Because his sampling technique is a 1-m throw |
net, he’s getting different varieties of fish than J. Browder’s trawl sampling, even when they |
sample in similar areas. He rarely gets seatrout or snook, and although there may be some |
species of fish that are more commonly found in the lower-salinity nearshore areas, he |
suspects their presence is more likely the result of habitat conditions than the salinity regime |
itself. When I mentioned the goldspotted killifish (potential indicator sp. that had been |
suggested by C. Faunce), he confirmed that he has gotten them fairly routinely (17 specimens |
in + 30 samples) primarily in his lower-salinity (i.e., 15-20 ppt) sample sites. |
Although fishes are his primary focus, he does suggest that our target should be to |
establish and/or maintain a salinity regime that is conducive to maintaining Halodule wrightii |
beds in the westerly areas of the bay. |
12 |
U.S. Geological Survey (Continued) |
Interviewee: Lynn Wingard. Interviewer: G. Braun. Interview date: October 10, 2003. |
Ms. Wingard is a mollusk expert who has worked extensively with Scott Ishman |
regarding paleo-ecological investigations of sediment cores in Florida Bay and, to a lesser |
extent, in Biscayne Bay. She is familiar with the MFL process in general. She is working on |
a several-year project analyzing historical and current populations of mollusks in S. Florida, |
and by the project’s conclusion, she may be able to identify species that would be good |
indicators for estuarine conditions in Biscayne Bay. At this time, however, her research |
indicates that most mollusks have broad tolerance ranges for salinity. Many species (e.g., |
scorched mussel (Brachidontes exustis) seem to do fine in salinities ranging from 10 ppt to |
60 ppt. One species that does have oligohaline requirements is a member of the genus |
Polymesota, but she has yet to find one alive in Biscayne Bay. Her report is to be completed |
during July 2004. The project teams recommends that WMD receive and review this report |
once it becomes available, to see if there is any additional information that would be helpful. |
ACADEMIA |
Florida International University |
Interviewee: Joseph Boyer, Ph.D., Southeast Environmental Research Center, FIU. |
Interviewer: G. Braun. Interview date: Sep. 24, 2003. |
Dr. Boyer is not really knowledgeable or familiar with MFL rule or process. His |
primary focus is water quality, and he has published several reports (some funded by |
SFWMD) regarding his water quality work in Southern Biscayne Bay. He has documented |
various water quality parameters, and suggests that it will be exceedingly challenging and |
expensive, if not impossible, to distinguish adverse ecological impacts that occur as a result |
of salinity changes alone, as his research has led him to believe that SAV communities are |
equally affected by other (i.e., non-salinity) water quality parameters. He suggests that |
subsurface flows have considerable effects on nearshore water quality, and must be |
considered during development of the MFL for Biscayne Bay. His “Total Ammonia |
Concentrations…along W shoreline of BB..” paper, that he and J. Meeder authored, |
identifies the results of water quality analyses, and relates SAV presence and distribution to |
salinity. |
He believes that the current degraded ecological condition should not be the baseline |
for preventing significant harm, and that there is the need to establish a healthy estuarine |
system that includes seasonal variations as the target, and which recognize that the MFLs |
might have seasonal disparity. |
Florida International University (Continued) |
Interviewee: Dr. James Fourqueran. Interviewer: R. Lewis. Interview date: October 29, |
2003. |
Dr. Fourqueran indicated that he is “More or less familiar with the MFL process”. |
Based on discussions with G. Braun, I was aware that Danielle Mir-Gonzalez was working |
on detailed seagrass maps of the distribution by species of seagrasses in relationship to |
groundwater discharges into Biscayne Bay as submerged discharges (boils, springs in the |
Bay). Although some detailed maps have been prepared, she is not yet finished with her |
13 |
degree work and her committee including Fourqueran, Boyer and Meeder (chair and most |
directly responsible for data distribution) is reluctant to release the information until her |
degree work is finished, however it was suggested that the FIU website |
(www.fiu.org/~seagrass) might have some seagrass data may be helpful. |
Dr. Fourqueran suggested that correspondence be directed to Dr. Meeder inquiring about the |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.