text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
do not understand fish life cycles |
1 |
Soil Characteristics |
1 |
SPEED OF |
ADAPTIVE MGMT |
(Slow (0), Medium (3) , Fast (5)) |
17 |
1 14 |
1 |
Medium |
Slow |
18 |
5 |
3 23 |
FEASIBILITY OF COST-EFFECTIVE |
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS |
(Very costly (0), Comparatively inexpensive (5) |
3 5 |
OPPORTUNITIES & Score |
(0 = creates numerous problems; |
5 = creates few problems) |
THREATS & Score |
(0 = large # of threats, 5= few) |
2 |
STRENGTHS & Score |
(0 - no strengths, 5 = strong) |
rev 11-14-03 |
Table E-2 |
Advantages and Disadvantages of Different MFL Approaches for Biscayne Bay |
Northern Biscayne Bay Sub-region |
POTENTIAL APPROACHES APPROACH SCORE |
(Cumulative Total) |
Seatrout & manatees have public appeal |
Reasonably good existing database |
Little public interest in Johnson's Seagrass |
Relatively easy to ID Significant Harm Critical habitat already designated Yes - Data already being compiled |
A lot of scientific work already done |
Seatout not currently abundant |
Difficulty in monitoring minimal changes |
Existing conditions are highly variable Difficult to quantify "vitality" of seagrasses Yes - Data already being compiled |
Few shoreline mangroves |
Would prevent continued degradation Yes - Data already being compiled |
Would maintain existing depauperate fishery |
Likely significant public opposition Likley significant public opposition |
Would maintain a viable fishery Public acceptance Lack of scientific base to work from Expensive and long term |
Common scientific tool Not developed for Biscayne Bay May be useful with much further study Not understandable as real Expensive and long term |
Common scientific tool Not developed for Biscayne Bay May be useful with much further study Impacts from acts of nature (e.g., hurricanes) Very expensive and long term |
Would require additional shorline vegetation |
Relatively easy to monitor No soils present |
Nearly entire shoreline bulkheaded |
Potential difficulties in relating population |
declines to reductions of fresh water flow |
Enhanced knowledge of H. johnsonii |
could cause permitting problems |
Designated critical habitat for manatees |
and Johnson's seagrass |
Potential difficulties in relating population |
declines to reductions of fresh water flow |
15 |
2 12 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
Medium |
3 2 |
4 Medium 3 |
1 6 |
17 |
1 14 |
18 |
3 3 33 Medium 5 22 |
Population declines may be unrelated to |
reductions in freshwater flow |
Restoration to pre-development |
conditions would be too expensive and |
not likely politically viable |
Inexpensive, but difficult to interpret |
Existing condition is somewhat degraded, but |
Significant Harm not yet reached 3 2 |
General ineffectiveness of existing regulatory |
programs |
Would require add'l approach for |
open-water areas |
Adverse impacts from non-salinity water |
quality parameters |
1 |
1 |
3 |
Medium |
3 4 |
2 |
Medium |
Medium |
Slow |
3 |
Medium |
12 |
1 |
Future reductions in seatorut and manatee gras |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.