text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
1 |
Restoration to pre-development |
conditions would be too expensive and |
not likely politically viable |
Inexpensive, but difficult to interpret |
1 1 |
General ineffectiveness of existing regulatory |
programs |
Would require add'l approach for |
open-water areas |
Adverse impacts from non-salinity water |
quality parameters |
1 |
Public acceptance would likely be low |
for replacing seawalls with shoreline |
vegetation |
Existing data base allows fast |
response |
2 |
2 2 16 |
Population declines may be unrelated to |
reductions in freshwater flow |
2 32 Somewhat Slow 3 15 |
1 5 |
17 |
1 8 |
1 11 |
2 33 3 4 20 |
Slow |
No public support - Area is the only major |
seaport in region |
Slow 1 0 5 |
Potential difficulties in relating population |
declines to reductions of fresh water flow |
Enhanced awareness of H. johnsonii |
could cause permitting problems |
Designated critical habitat for manatees |
and Johnson's seagrass |
Potential difficulties in relating population |
declines to reductions of fresh water flow |
Healthy environment in this area is less |
important than sustaining the economy |
Removal & disposal of sediments |
from River is problematic |
Would require more intensive |
seagrass mapping and monitoring 2 |
2 |
rev 11-15-03 |
Table E-4 |
Advantages and Disadvantages of Different MFL Approaches for Biscayne Bay |
Central Sub-region |
POTENTIAL APPROACHES APPROACH SCORE |
(Cumulative Total) |
Easily quantifiable Difficulty in relating pop. declines to flow Yes - Data already being compiled |
Public can relate Confounding impacts re commercial harvest |
Relatively easy to ID Significant Harm Pink shrimp annual recruitment Previously id'd in conceptual model Yes - Data already being compiled |
A lot of scientific work already done Difficulty in monitoring minimal changes |
Impacts of commercial harvest unknown May require controls on commercial harvest of shr |
Sounds good to the public Public acceptance Difficult to quantify "vitality" Expensive and long term |
Heterogeneous habitats |
Public acceptance The situation would only get worse with time Inexpensive but not legal |
Few Reduction in current legal uses of water |
Public acceptance Lack of scientific base to work from Expensive and long term |
Common scientific tool Not developed for Biscayne Bay May be useful with much further study Not understandable as real Expensive and long term |
Common scientific tool Not developed for Biscayne Bay May be useful with much further study Impacts from acts of nature (e.g., hurricanes) Very expensive and long term |
Easy to monitor Not connected to salinity changes alone |
Only applicable west of shoreline |
Increase in awareness of Johnson's seagrass |
could result in permitting problems |
Conceptually, "preserving the Bay" would be |
popular with the public, but preservation would |
likely involve maintaining degraded habitats |
12 |
12 |
4 Medium 3 1 |
10 |
2 13 1 2 |
Food Web Support 1 1 2 |
Requirement for preferred fish |
communities 1 1 1 Recreationally fishing is popular, but most |
fisherman do not understand fish life histories |
The preferred fish community based upon harvests is reefs, not generally sensitive |
to freshwater flows in this area |
Indicator Species |
(Pink Shrimp and Shoal grass) 4 3 4 |
4 |
Would require monitoring 3 different components |
Portions of Sub-region are presently |
in a condition of Significant Harm |
22 |
3 3 Medium 5 22 |
Preferred habitats is a 'fuzzy' concept - to |
many people, estuarine species may be less |
desirable than marine species in this part of the |
bay |
CERP & other restoration projects |
have already been identified |
Popular commercially harvested |
species used by recreational fishermen |
5 3 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.