text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
Future work will be needed to develop further the metrics associated with the hydrologic restoration |
targets fo r Biscayne National Park, including measures o f seasonal and interannual variability, and the |
development o f a timeline o f infrastructure implementation and associated salinity changes. The National |
Park Service looks forw ard to continued cooperation with our partner agencies in the establishment o f |
restoration targets fo r south Florida national parks, and to working with the responsible agencies to provide |
the needed water fo r restoration o f these nationally important natural areas. |
Robert Johnson |
Director |
South Florida Natural Resources Center |
Everglades National Park |
March, 2006 |
viii South Florida Natural Resources Center Technical Series (2006' 1) |
Ecological and Hydrologic Targets for Western Biscayne National Park 1 |
INTRODUCTION |
The purpose of this document is to establish a set of scientifically-based ecological and hydrologic targets in the western areas of Biscayne National Park and to use these targets |
to estimate the current water deliveries that are required for |
the protection of fish and wildlife and the natural resources. |
These current water deliveries will provide a baseline for |
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) projects |
to build upon in order to achieve substantial restoration of |
natural areas. |
Conservation Designations |
Biscayne National Park comprises the majority of the central |
and southern portions of Biscayne Bay. It was originally designated by Congress in 1968 as Biscayne National Monument, |
and later established as a national park in 1980. Biscayne Bay, |
its tributaries, and Card Sound are also designated by the state |
of Florida as aquatic preserves, and Card and Barnes Sounds |
are part of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Biscayne Bay was designated under the Surface Water Management and Improvement Act of 1987 as a priority water body |
by the Florida Legislature. The waters of Biscayne National |
Park, Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve, and the two sounds are |
classified as Outstanding Florida Waters and, as such, are subject to the most stringent regulations, including Florida antidegradation policies. Card and Barnes Sounds are important |
for the endangered American crocodile because they contain |
one-third of all crocodile nesting habitat in the continental |
United States, and the east shore of Barnes Sound is included |
within the Crocodile Lakes National Wildlife Refuge. |
All of these areas, including those in the Coastal Mangrove |
Zone, are Essential Fish Habitat as described by a federal mandate to improve fishery management plans in the United States |
(NOAA 1996). By definition, “essential habitat” incorporates |
habitat required by the full life cycle of a species, recognizing |
the need for protection of nursery and spawning habitats that |
are critical to the survival of a species. |
The National Park Service mission, as defined by the |
Organic Act of 1916, is “to conserve the scenery and the |
natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to |
provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by |
such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of |
future generations.” The National Park Service (NPS) believes |
that Biscayne National Park deserves a particularly high level |
of consideration for resource protection and restoration. |
Relationship to CERP Processes |
In drafting this report, existing performance measures and |
targets developed through the CERP Restoration, Coordination, and Verification (RECOVER) team for Biscayne Bay |
were used as the basis for interim targets for desired conditions. Modifications were made based on results of studies |
conducted in the bay or similar habitats in south Florida to |
improve the performance measures. In particular, while the |
RECOVER SE-6 performance measure is applicable in 3,200 |
acres adjacent to the mainland shore, we modified the measure to apply to 10,000 acres after considering physical conditions (including the sedimentary environment and the circulation of the bay) that affect the potential spatial extent of |
seagrass, the basis for the diverse benthic communities in the |
western part of Biscayne Bay. |
The hydrologic targets and flow volumes described in this |
report were developed using the process described in draft |
CERP Guidance Memorandum 4. The Guidance Memorandum method was developed jointly by staff from the Corps of |
Engineers, the South Florida Water Management District, the |
National Park Service, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service |
and, while the GM is specifically designed to quantify water |
made available by a CERP project, we determined that the |
method could be applied for the purposes of this report with |
minor modifications. The quantification method requires the |
use of hydrologic restoration targets based on desired and/or |
historic ecological conditions. According to this method, |
water that is available for the protection of fish and wildlife |
includes all existing managed flows or water levels that are |
equal to, or less than, the restoration target as determined by |
comparing time series. Water in excess of the daily restoration |
targets may be beneficial if delivered at other times of the year, |
but the sum of the daily exceedences are less than the additional water required to meet annual restoration targets. |
This report describes the desired conditions of the park in |
terms of biology, ecology, and available historical record. The |
“desired condition” takes into account historical information |
about the ecosystem, but is not necessarily equivalent to a |
pre-drainage state. Biological indicators, including those described by RECOVER, are used to set environmental targets |
affected by inflows, primarily as measures of seasonal salinity |
patterns in key areas of the park. By using target values for |
salinity, hydrologic targets (freshwater inflows and their interaction with precipitation and circulation) can be estimated. |
Other relevant indicators of bay health derived from previous |
and current studies in Biscayne Bay also are discussed in support of defining desired conditions and the salinities needed |
to sustain them. |
This report provides a description of ecological targets |
and targets for salinity, but does not provide an estimate of |
quantitative hydrologic targets for the Coastal Mangrove |
Zone. The Coastal Mangrove Zone presents a challenge for |
the calculation of beneficial water using the methodology |
outlined in draft Guidance Memorandum 4 because human |
development has lowered the water table and eliminated surface water that historically entered the coastal wetlands via the |
tranverse glades. Because canals deliver freshwater all the way |
to the bay shore, freshwater inputs to the Coastal Mangrove |
Zone are dependent on canal stages and local rainfall. The |
task of estimating quantitative hydrologic targets for this area |
Florida Turnpike |
2 South Florida Natural Resources Center Technical Series (2006:1 ) |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.