text stringlengths 0 6.44k |
|---|
from the western shoreline (encompassing approximately 6400 |
acres), the green the area from 2km to 5km from shore, and the |
blue >5km from shore. The thin lines denote an envelope of +/-1 |
standard deviation of the residuals from the fitted curve. |
18 South Florida Natural Resources Center Technical Series (2006:1) |
substantially less salinity reduction effect, so while it takes a |
rate of only 300 K acre-ft/yr (415 cfs) to lower mean salinities |
by over 20 ppt over 30 days time in the nearshore region, to |
reduce them a further 5 ppt appears to take about 700 K acreft/yr (970 cfs) more. This is mostly a reflection of conservation |
of volume - the increased volumes of freshwaters displace the |
mixed and marine waters to sea as the bay’s volume stays the |
same - coupled with the efficiency of tidal exchange and turbulent diffusion. |
The South Florida Water Management Model (SFWMM) |
driven by a 35-year time series of environmental inputs was |
chosen to represent the current flows in the quantification |
of beneficial waters. Choosing a model to represent the current flow conditions serves several purposes: to enable the |
reconstruction of flows in the past, to permit these flows to |
be comparable relative to some common water management |
operations, and to isolate local rainfall effects from the impact |
of the water management practices that are at the core of the |
estimate of beneficial waters. While a number of reasonable |
SFWMM model variants (Alt7r, Base2000, etc.) exist that |
could be utilized for this study, model run Alt7r5e was chosen. |
It is not expected that the use of any of the modern variants |
would significantly change the outcome of the analysis. |
Estimation of "Beneficial" Flows |
protection of fish and wildlife because all flows that exceed the |
target, even if they would be beneficial if delivered at another |
time, are excluded from the total beneficial quantity (Fig. 9). |
Superimposed on the time series flows are the estimated |
target flows discussed in the previous section, both for the |
preferred 10,000 acre target (red wet/dry seasonal step function) and the RECOVER SE-6 3,200 acre target (yellow wet/ |
dry seasonal step function) (Figs. 10 and 11). While most of |
Time Series of Flow to Biscayne National Park and Target Flow |
The estimate of “beneficial” flow volumes is based on the |
methods described in draft CERP Guidance Memorandum 4. |
Coastal discharges computed from the SFWMM Alt7r model |
runs were compared to the 10,000 acre target flow estimates |
to arrive at the classification of beneficial flows in accordance with Guidance Memorandum 4. The beneficial water |
calculation of the Guidance Memorandum provides a minimum estimate of the water volume currently available for the |
exceedence in % |
Figure 9. Exceedence curve for flows to southern Biscayne Bay |
based on the SFWMM Alt7r monthly time series (1965-2000) of |
coastal flows. |
Figure 10. The daily time series of flows into southern Biscayne |
Bay (measured= green, modeled Alt7r5e = blue) with the 10,000 |
acre seasonal volumetric target (red) and 3,200 acre target |
(yellow). |
Monthly Time Series of Flows to Biscayne Bay |
mean flow for 2x2 alt7r = 317.8 (301.2 beneficial) Kaf/yr |
mean flow for observed = 490.8 (455 4 beneficial) Kaf/yr |
mean flow 10k ac target |
mean flow 250/500m targ< t = |
1066.4 Ka /yr based on Habitat area |
244.2 K if/yr based on RËCOVER PMs |
Figure 11. The monthly time series of flows into southern Biscayne Bay (measured= green, modeled Alt7r5e = blue) with the |
10,000 acre seasonal volumetric target (red) and 3,200 acre target (yellow). The monthly aggregation reduces the impact of |
peak daily flows on the beneficial flow estimate and increases |
the volume by approximately 10% of the available flows. |
Ecological and Hydrologic Targets for Western Biscayne National Park 19 |
Monthly Reserved Flows to Southern Biscayne Bay based on Alt7r |
397.0 out of 415.8 ± 382.5 Kaf/y is beneficial |
140----- 1----- 1----- ,----- 1----- 1----- .- |
100 - |
o ■ 1 ' u « n u *■ i u i u l u u a i i |
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 |
Figure 12. The monthly time series of beneficial flows to southern Biscayne Bay through S22, G93, S123, S21, S21A, S20F, S20D, |
and S197 as estimated from SFWMM Alt7e. Total average annual |
flows are 416 K acre-ft/yr using these criteria. |
the flow time series is lower than the 10,000 acre target, it is |
clear that in the daily time series (Fig. 10) there are many peak |
flows which exceed the target. For the 3,200 acre target, only |
about 20% of flows would fit the definition of a beneficial |
flow. However, for the preferred 10,000 acre target, about |
83% of the flows, (390 K acre-ft/yr of the 475 K acre-ft/yr |
total of daily observed flows,) classify as beneficial flows. The |
monthly aggregation (Fig. 11) reduces the cropping of the |
peaks by about 10%, since the pulsed flows following storm |
events rarely last more than a few days and do not have a |
great impact on the monthly mean. The monthly aggregation |
estimates result in 455.4 K acre-ft/yr out of 490.8 K acre-ft/yr |
or 92% of the observed flows being classified as beneficial for |
the 10,000 acre target. Figure 12 provides the time series of |
modeled beneficial flows. The seasonal distribution of these |
monthly aggregations demonstrates that the flows in the dry |
season (November-May) are almost always entirely classified |
as beneficial, and graphically demonstrates the importance of |
the timing of these beneficial flows (Fig. 13). |
An alternate view of this same time series is made possible |
by using the salinity metric, where the observed and modeled |
flows have been transferred to salinity space via the flow volume versus salinity anomaly expression developed earlier and |
normalized to a 1km strip of coastal waters along the western |
shore to enable comparison. Though limited to 35 ppt (there is |
no evaporation in this example, hence hypersaline conditions |
are not possible), the daily flows result in salinity that is higher |
than the mean of the salinity targets about 75% of the time for |
the preferred 10,000 acre target (Fig. 14). The most significant |
advantage of using salinity as an ultimate flow target indicator |
or metric is not only ecologically critical in the estuary, but |
Alt7r Monthly Mean Flows to Biscayne Bay, 1965-2000 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.