statement
stringlengths
1
2.88k
proof
stringlengths
0
13.9k
type
stringclasses
10 values
symbolic_name
stringlengths
1
131
library
stringclasses
417 values
filename
stringlengths
17
80
imports
listlengths
0
16
deps
listlengths
0
64
docstring
stringlengths
0
10.2k
source_url
stringclasses
1 value
commit
stringclasses
1 value
smul_upper_bounds_subset_lower_bounds_smul (hc : c ≤ 0) : c • upper_bounds s ⊆ lower_bounds (c • s)
(antitone_smul_left hc).image_upper_bounds_subset_lower_bounds_image
lemma
smul_upper_bounds_subset_lower_bounds_smul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/module.lean
[ "algebra.order.smul" ]
[ "antitone_smul_left", "lower_bounds", "upper_bounds" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
bdd_below.smul_of_nonpos (hc : c ≤ 0) (hs : bdd_below s) : bdd_above (c • s)
(antitone_smul_left hc).map_bdd_below hs
lemma
bdd_below.smul_of_nonpos
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/module.lean
[ "algebra.order.smul" ]
[ "antitone_smul_left", "bdd_above", "bdd_below" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
bdd_above.smul_of_nonpos (hc : c ≤ 0) (hs : bdd_above s) : bdd_below (c • s)
(antitone_smul_left hc).map_bdd_above hs
lemma
bdd_above.smul_of_nonpos
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/module.lean
[ "algebra.order.smul" ]
[ "antitone_smul_left", "bdd_above", "bdd_below" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_max_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) (b₁ b₂ : M) : a • max b₁ b₂ = min (a • b₁) (a • b₂)
(antitone_smul_left ha : antitone (_ : M → M)).map_max
lemma
smul_max_of_nonpos
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/module.lean
[ "algebra.order.smul" ]
[ "antitone", "antitone_smul_left" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_min_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) (b₁ b₂ : M) : a • min b₁ b₂ = max (a • b₁) (a • b₂)
(antitone_smul_left ha : antitone (_ : M → M)).map_min
lemma
smul_min_of_nonpos
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/module.lean
[ "algebra.order.smul" ]
[ "antitone", "antitone_smul_left" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
lower_bounds_smul_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : lower_bounds (c • s) = c • upper_bounds s
(order_iso.smul_left_dual M hc).upper_bounds_image
lemma
lower_bounds_smul_of_neg
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/module.lean
[ "algebra.order.smul" ]
[ "lower_bounds", "order_iso.smul_left_dual", "upper_bounds" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
upper_bounds_smul_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : upper_bounds (c • s) = c • lower_bounds s
(order_iso.smul_left_dual M hc).lower_bounds_image
lemma
upper_bounds_smul_of_neg
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/module.lean
[ "algebra.order.smul" ]
[ "lower_bounds", "order_iso.smul_left_dual", "upper_bounds" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
bdd_below_smul_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : bdd_below (c • s) ↔ bdd_above s
(order_iso.smul_left_dual M hc).bdd_above_image
lemma
bdd_below_smul_iff_of_neg
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/module.lean
[ "algebra.order.smul" ]
[ "bdd_above", "bdd_below", "order_iso.smul_left_dual" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
bdd_above_smul_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : bdd_above (c • s) ↔ bdd_below s
(order_iso.smul_left_dual M hc).bdd_below_image
lemma
bdd_above_smul_iff_of_neg
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/module.lean
[ "algebra.order.smul" ]
[ "bdd_above", "bdd_below", "order_iso.smul_left_dual" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ordered_comm_monoid {ι : Type*} {Z : ι → Type*} [∀ i, ordered_comm_monoid (Z i)] : ordered_comm_monoid (Π i, Z i)
{ mul_le_mul_left := λ f g w h i, mul_le_mul_left' (w i) _, ..pi.partial_order, ..pi.comm_monoid, }
instance
pi.ordered_comm_monoid
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[ "mul_le_mul_left", "mul_le_mul_left'", "ordered_comm_monoid", "pi.comm_monoid", "pi.partial_order" ]
The product of a family of ordered commutative monoids is an ordered commutative monoid.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ordered_cancel_comm_monoid [∀ i, ordered_cancel_comm_monoid $ f i] : ordered_cancel_comm_monoid (Π i : I, f i)
by refine_struct { mul := (*), one := (1 : Π i, f i), le := (≤), lt := (<), npow := monoid.npow, .. pi.partial_order, .. pi.monoid }; tactic.pi_instance_derive_field
instance
pi.ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[ "ordered_cancel_comm_monoid", "pi.monoid", "pi.partial_order", "tactic.pi_instance_derive_field" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ordered_comm_group [∀ i, ordered_comm_group $ f i] : ordered_comm_group (Π i : I, f i)
{ mul := (*), one := (1 : Π i, f i), le := (≤), lt := (<), npow := monoid.npow, ..pi.comm_group, ..pi.ordered_comm_monoid, }
instance
pi.ordered_comm_group
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[ "ordered_comm_group", "pi.comm_group", "pi.ordered_comm_monoid" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
one_le_const_of_one_le (ha : 1 ≤ a) : 1 ≤ const β a
λ _, ha
lemma
function.one_le_const_of_one_le
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
const_le_one_of_le_one (ha : a ≤ 1) : const β a ≤ 1
λ _, ha
lemma
function.const_le_one_of_le_one
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
one_le_const : 1 ≤ const β a ↔ 1 ≤ a
@const_le_const _ _ _ _ 1 _
lemma
function.one_le_const
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
one_lt_const : 1 < const β a ↔ 1 < a
@const_lt_const _ _ _ _ 1 a
lemma
function.one_lt_const
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
const_le_one : const β a ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1
@const_le_const _ _ _ _ _ 1
lemma
function.const_le_one
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
const_lt_one : const β a < 1 ↔ a < 1
@const_lt_const _ _ _ _ _ 1
lemma
function.const_lt_one
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
function_const_nonneg_of_pos [preorder α] (ha : 0 < a) : 0 ≤ const ι a
const_nonneg_of_nonneg _ ha.le
lemma
tactic.function_const_nonneg_of_pos
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
function_const_ne_zero : a ≠ 0 → const ι a ≠ 0
const_ne_zero.2
lemma
tactic.function_const_ne_zero
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
function_const_pos [preorder α] : 0 < a → 0 < const ι a
const_pos.2
lemma
tactic.function_const_pos
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
positivity_const : expr → tactic strictness
| `(function.const %%ι %%a) := do strict_a ← core a, match strict_a with | positive p := positive <$> to_expr ``(function_const_pos %%ι %%p) <|> nonnegative <$> to_expr ``(function_const_nonneg_of_pos %%ι %%p) | nonnegative p := nonnegative <$> to_expr ``(const_nonneg_of_nonneg %%ι %%p) | no...
def
tactic.positivity_const
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pi.lean
[ "algebra.order.ring.defs", "algebra.ring.pi", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `function.const` is positive/nonnegative/nonzero if its input is.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
cSup_one : Sup (1 : set α) = 1
cSup_singleton _
lemma
cSup_one
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "cSup_singleton" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
cInf_one : Inf (1 : set α) = 1
cInf_singleton _
lemma
cInf_one
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "cInf_singleton" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
cSup_inv (hs₀ : s.nonempty) (hs₁ : bdd_below s) : Sup s⁻¹ = (Inf s)⁻¹
by { rw ←image_inv, exact ((order_iso.inv α).map_cInf' hs₀ hs₁).symm }
lemma
cSup_inv
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "bdd_below", "order_iso.inv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
cInf_inv (hs₀ : s.nonempty) (hs₁ : bdd_above s) : Inf s⁻¹ = (Sup s)⁻¹
by { rw ←image_inv, exact ((order_iso.inv α).map_cSup' hs₀ hs₁).symm }
lemma
cInf_inv
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "bdd_above", "order_iso.inv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
cSup_mul (hs₀ : s.nonempty) (hs₁ : bdd_above s) (ht₀ : t.nonempty) (ht₁ : bdd_above t) : Sup (s * t) = Sup s * Sup t
cSup_image2_eq_cSup_cSup (λ _, (order_iso.mul_right _).to_galois_connection) (λ _, (order_iso.mul_left _).to_galois_connection) hs₀ hs₁ ht₀ ht₁
lemma
cSup_mul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "bdd_above", "cSup_image2_eq_cSup_cSup", "order_iso.mul_left", "order_iso.mul_right" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
cInf_mul (hs₀ : s.nonempty) (hs₁ : bdd_below s) (ht₀ : t.nonempty) (ht₁ : bdd_below t) : Inf (s * t) = Inf s * Inf t
cInf_image2_eq_cInf_cInf (λ _, (order_iso.mul_right _).symm.to_galois_connection) (λ _, (order_iso.mul_left _).symm.to_galois_connection) hs₀ hs₁ ht₀ ht₁
lemma
cInf_mul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "bdd_below", "cInf_image2_eq_cInf_cInf", "order_iso.mul_left", "order_iso.mul_right" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
cSup_div (hs₀ : s.nonempty) (hs₁ : bdd_above s) (ht₀ : t.nonempty) (ht₁ : bdd_below t) : Sup (s / t) = Sup s / Inf t
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, cSup_mul hs₀ hs₁ ht₀.inv ht₁.inv, cSup_inv ht₀ ht₁, div_eq_mul_inv]
lemma
cSup_div
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "bdd_above", "bdd_below", "cSup_inv", "cSup_mul", "div_eq_mul_inv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
cInf_div (hs₀ : s.nonempty) (hs₁ : bdd_below s) (ht₀ : t.nonempty) (ht₁ : bdd_above t) : Inf (s / t) = Inf s / Sup t
by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, cInf_mul hs₀ hs₁ ht₀.inv ht₁.inv, cInf_inv ht₀ ht₁, div_eq_mul_inv]
lemma
cInf_div
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "bdd_above", "bdd_below", "cInf_inv", "cInf_mul", "div_eq_mul_inv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Sup_one : Sup (1 : set α) = 1
Sup_singleton
lemma
Sup_one
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "Sup_singleton" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Inf_one : Inf (1 : set α) = 1
Inf_singleton
lemma
Inf_one
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "Inf_singleton" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Sup_inv (s : set α) : Sup s⁻¹ = (Inf s)⁻¹
by { rw [←image_inv, Sup_image], exact ((order_iso.inv α).map_Inf _).symm }
lemma
Sup_inv
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "Sup_image", "order_iso.inv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Inf_inv (s : set α) : Inf s⁻¹ = (Sup s)⁻¹
by { rw [←image_inv, Inf_image], exact ((order_iso.inv α).map_Sup _).symm }
lemma
Inf_inv
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "Inf_image", "order_iso.inv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Sup_mul : Sup (s * t) = Sup s * Sup t
Sup_image2_eq_Sup_Sup (λ _, (order_iso.mul_right _).to_galois_connection) $ λ _, (order_iso.mul_left _).to_galois_connection
lemma
Sup_mul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "Sup_image2_eq_Sup_Sup", "order_iso.mul_left", "order_iso.mul_right" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Inf_mul : Inf (s * t) = Inf s * Inf t
Inf_image2_eq_Inf_Inf (λ _, (order_iso.mul_right _).symm.to_galois_connection) $ λ _, (order_iso.mul_left _).symm.to_galois_connection
lemma
Inf_mul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "Inf_image2_eq_Inf_Inf", "order_iso.mul_left", "order_iso.mul_right" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Sup_div : Sup (s / t) = Sup s / Inf t
by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, Sup_mul, Sup_inv]
lemma
Sup_div
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "Sup_inv", "Sup_mul", "div_eq_mul_inv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Inf_div : Inf (s / t) = Inf s / Sup t
by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, Inf_mul, Inf_inv]
lemma
Inf_div
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "Inf_inv", "Inf_mul", "div_eq_mul_inv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_Ioo : r • Ioo a b = Ioo (r • a) (r • b)
begin ext x, simp only [mem_smul_set, smul_eq_mul, mem_Ioo], split, { rintro ⟨a, ⟨a_h_left_left, a_h_left_right⟩, rfl⟩, split, exact (mul_lt_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left_left, exact (mul_lt_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left_right, }, { rintro ⟨a_left, a_right⟩, use x / r, refine ⟨⟨(lt_div_iff' hr).mpr a_...
lemma
linear_ordered_field.smul_Ioo
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "div_lt_iff'", "lt_div_iff'", "mul_div_cancel'", "mul_lt_mul_left", "smul_eq_mul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_Icc : r • Icc a b = Icc (r • a) (r • b)
begin ext x, simp only [mem_smul_set, smul_eq_mul, mem_Icc], split, { rintro ⟨a, ⟨a_h_left_left, a_h_left_right⟩, rfl⟩, split, exact (mul_le_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left_left, exact (mul_le_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left_right, }, { rintro ⟨a_left, a_right⟩, use x / r, refine ⟨⟨(le_div_iff' hr).mpr a_...
lemma
linear_ordered_field.smul_Icc
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "div_le_iff'", "le_div_iff'", "mul_div_cancel'", "mul_le_mul_left", "smul_eq_mul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_Ico : r • Ico a b = Ico (r • a) (r • b)
begin ext x, simp only [mem_smul_set, smul_eq_mul, mem_Ico], split, { rintro ⟨a, ⟨a_h_left_left, a_h_left_right⟩, rfl⟩, split, exact (mul_le_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left_left, exact (mul_lt_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left_right, }, { rintro ⟨a_left, a_right⟩, use x / r, refine ⟨⟨(le_div_iff' hr).mpr a_...
lemma
linear_ordered_field.smul_Ico
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "div_lt_iff'", "le_div_iff'", "mul_div_cancel'", "mul_le_mul_left", "mul_lt_mul_left", "smul_eq_mul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_Ioc : r • Ioc a b = Ioc (r • a) (r • b)
begin ext x, simp only [mem_smul_set, smul_eq_mul, mem_Ioc], split, { rintro ⟨a, ⟨a_h_left_left, a_h_left_right⟩, rfl⟩, split, exact (mul_lt_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left_left, exact (mul_le_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left_right, }, { rintro ⟨a_left, a_right⟩, use x / r, refine ⟨⟨(lt_div_iff' hr).mpr a_...
lemma
linear_ordered_field.smul_Ioc
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "div_le_iff'", "lt_div_iff'", "mul_div_cancel'", "mul_le_mul_left", "mul_lt_mul_left", "smul_eq_mul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_Ioi : r • Ioi a = Ioi (r • a)
begin ext x, simp only [mem_smul_set, smul_eq_mul, mem_Ioi], split, { rintro ⟨a_w, a_h_left, rfl⟩, exact (mul_lt_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left, }, { rintro h, use x / r, split, exact (lt_div_iff' hr).mpr h, exact mul_div_cancel' _ (ne_of_gt hr), } end
lemma
linear_ordered_field.smul_Ioi
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "lt_div_iff'", "mul_div_cancel'", "mul_lt_mul_left", "smul_eq_mul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_Iio : r • Iio a = Iio (r • a)
begin ext x, simp only [mem_smul_set, smul_eq_mul, mem_Iio], split, { rintro ⟨a_w, a_h_left, rfl⟩, exact (mul_lt_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left, }, { rintro h, use x / r, split, exact (div_lt_iff' hr).mpr h, exact mul_div_cancel' _ (ne_of_gt hr), } end
lemma
linear_ordered_field.smul_Iio
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "div_lt_iff'", "mul_div_cancel'", "mul_lt_mul_left", "smul_eq_mul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_Ici : r • Ici a = Ici (r • a)
begin ext x, simp only [mem_smul_set, smul_eq_mul, mem_Ioi], split, { rintro ⟨a_w, a_h_left, rfl⟩, exact (mul_le_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left, }, { rintro h, use x / r, split, exact (le_div_iff' hr).mpr h, exact mul_div_cancel' _ (ne_of_gt hr), } end
lemma
linear_ordered_field.smul_Ici
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "le_div_iff'", "mul_div_cancel'", "mul_le_mul_left", "smul_eq_mul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_Iic : r • Iic a = Iic (r • a)
begin ext x, simp only [mem_smul_set, smul_eq_mul, mem_Iio], split, { rintro ⟨a_w, a_h_left, rfl⟩, exact (mul_le_mul_left hr).mpr a_h_left, }, { rintro h, use x / r, split, exact (div_le_iff' hr).mpr h, exact mul_div_cancel' _ (ne_of_gt hr), } end
lemma
linear_ordered_field.smul_Iic
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/pointwise.lean
[ "algebra.bounds", "data.set.pointwise.smul" ]
[ "div_le_iff'", "mul_div_cancel'", "mul_le_mul_left", "smul_eq_mul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i • g (σ i) ≤ ∑ i in s, f i • g i
begin classical, revert hσ σ hfg, apply finset.induction_on_max_value (λ i, to_lex (g i, f i)) s, { simp only [le_rfl, finset.sum_empty, implies_true_iff] }, intros a s has hamax hind σ hfg hσ, set τ : perm ι := σ.trans (swap a (σ a)) with hτ, have hτs : {x | τ x ≠ x} ⊆ s, { intros x hx, simp only [...
lemma
monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "eq_or_ne", "equiv.coe_trans", "equiv.swap_comp_apply", "finset.induction_on_max_value", "le_rfl", "monovary_on", "ne_of_apply_ne", "prod.lex.le_iff", "smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul'", "to_lex" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g` is maximized when `f` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i • g (σ i) = ∑ i in s, f i • g i ↔ monovary_on f (g ∘ σ) s
begin classical, refine ⟨not_imp_not.1 $ λ h, _, λ h, (hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ).antisymm _⟩, { rw monovary_on at h, push_neg at h, obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hgxy, hfxy⟩ := h, set τ : perm ι := (swap x y).trans σ, have hτs : {x | τ x ≠ x} ⊆ s, { refine (set_support_mul_subset σ $ swap...
lemma
monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "eq_or_ne", "equiv.coe_trans", "monovary_on", "set.union_subset", "smul_add_smul_lt_smul_add_smul" ]
**Equality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i • g (σ i) < ∑ i in s, f i • g i ↔ ¬ monovary_on f (g ∘ σ) s
by simp [←hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ, lt_iff_le_and_ne, hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ]
lemma
monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "lt_iff_le_and_ne", "monovary_on" ]
**Strict inequality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` do not monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f (σ i) • g i ≤ ∑ i in s, f i • g i
begin convert hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (show {x | σ⁻¹ x ≠ x} ⊆ s, by simp only [set_support_inv_eq, hσ]) using 1, exact σ.sum_comp' s (λ i j, f i • g j) hσ, end
lemma
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary_on" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g` is maximized when `f` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f (σ i) • g i = ∑ i in s, f i • g i ↔ monovary_on (f ∘ σ) g s
begin have hσinv : {x | σ⁻¹ x ≠ x} ⊆ s := (set_support_inv_eq _).subset.trans hσ, refine (iff.trans _ $ hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσinv).trans ⟨λ h, _, λ h, _⟩, { simpa only [σ.sum_comp' s (λ i j, f i • g j) hσ] }, { convert h.comp_right σ, { rw [comp.assoc, inv_def, symm_comp_self, comp.right_...
lemma
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary_on", "set.image_perm" ]
**Equality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f (σ i) • g i < ∑ i in s, f i • g i ↔ ¬ monovary_on (f ∘ σ) g s
by simp [←hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ, lt_iff_le_and_ne, hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul hσ]
lemma
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "lt_iff_le_and_ne", "monovary_on" ]
**Strict inequality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` do not monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i • g i ≤ ∑ i in s, f i • g (σ i)
hfg.dual_right.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ
lemma
antivary_on.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g` is minimized when `f` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i • g (σ i) = ∑ i in s, f i • g i ↔ antivary_on f (g ∘ σ) s
(hfg.dual_right.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ).trans monovary_on_to_dual_right
lemma
antivary_on.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on", "monovary_on_to_dual_right" ]
**Equality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i • g i < ∑ i in s, f i • g (σ i) ↔ ¬ antivary_on f (g ∘ σ) s
by simp [←hfg.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff hσ, lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, hfg.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm hσ]
lemma
antivary_on.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on", "lt_iff_le_and_ne" ]
**Strict inequality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` do not antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i • g i ≤ ∑ i in s, f (σ i) • g i
hfg.dual_right.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul hσ
lemma
antivary_on.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g` is minimized when `f` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f (σ i) • g i = ∑ i in s, f i • g i ↔ antivary_on (f ∘ σ) g s
(hfg.dual_right.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ).trans monovary_on_to_dual_right
lemma
antivary_on.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on", "monovary_on_to_dual_right" ]
**Equality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i • g i < ∑ i in s, f (σ i) • g i ↔ ¬ antivary_on (f ∘ σ) g s
by simp [←hfg.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff hσ, eq_comm, lt_iff_le_and_ne, hfg.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul hσ]
lemma
antivary_on.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on", "lt_iff_le_and_ne" ]
**Strict inequality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` do not antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f i • g (σ i) ≤ ∑ i, f i • g i
(hfg.monovary_on _).sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul $ λ i _, mem_univ _
lemma
monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g` is maximized when `f` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f i • g (σ i) = ∑ i, f i • g i ↔ monovary f (g ∘ σ)
by simp [(hfg.monovary_on _).sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff (λ i _, mem_univ _)]
lemma
monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Equality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f i • g (σ i) < ∑ i, f i • g i ↔ ¬ monovary f (g ∘ σ)
by simp [(hfg.monovary_on _).sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff (λ i _, mem_univ _)]
lemma
monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Strict inequality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` do not monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f (σ i) • g i ≤ ∑ i, f i • g i
(hfg.monovary_on _).sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul $ λ i _, mem_univ _
lemma
monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g` is maximized when `f` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f (σ i) • g i = ∑ i, f i • g i ↔ monovary (f ∘ σ) g
by simp [(hfg.monovary_on _).sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff (λ i _, mem_univ _)]
lemma
monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Equality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f (σ i) • g i < ∑ i, f i • g i ↔ ¬ monovary (f ∘ σ) g
by simp [(hfg.monovary_on _).sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff (λ i _, mem_univ _)]
lemma
monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Strict inequality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` do not monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f i • g i ≤ ∑ i, f i • g (σ i)
(hfg.antivary_on _).sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm $ λ i _, mem_univ _
lemma
antivary.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g` is minimized when `f` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f i • g (σ i) = ∑ i, f i • g i ↔ antivary f (g ∘ σ)
by simp [(hfg.antivary_on _).sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (λ i _, mem_univ _)]
lemma
antivary.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Equality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f i • g i < ∑ i, f i • g (σ i) ↔ ¬ antivary f (g ∘ σ)
by simp [(hfg.antivary_on _).sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (λ i _, mem_univ _)]
lemma
antivary.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Strict inequality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` do not antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f i • g i ≤ ∑ i, f (σ i) • g i
(hfg.antivary_on _).sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul $ λ i _, mem_univ _
lemma
antivary.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g` is minimized when `f` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f (σ i) • g i = ∑ i, f i • g i ↔ antivary (f ∘ σ) g
by simp [(hfg.antivary_on _).sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (λ i _, mem_univ _)]
lemma
antivary.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Equality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f i • g i < ∑ i, f (σ i) • g i ↔ ¬ antivary (f ∘ σ) g
by simp [(hfg.antivary_on _).sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (λ i _, mem_univ _)]
lemma
antivary.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Strict inequality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` do not antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_mul_comp_perm_le_sum_mul (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i * g (σ i) ≤ ∑ i in s, f i * g i
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ
lemma
monovary_on.sum_mul_comp_perm_le_sum_mul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary_on" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g` is maximized when `f` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_mul_comp_perm_eq_sum_mul_iff (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i * g (σ i) = ∑ i in s, f i * g i ↔ monovary_on f (g ∘ σ) s
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ
lemma
monovary_on.sum_mul_comp_perm_eq_sum_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary_on" ]
**Equality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_mul_comp_perm_lt_sum_mul_iff (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i • g (σ i) < ∑ i in s, f i • g i ↔ ¬ monovary_on f (g ∘ σ) s
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff hσ
lemma
monovary_on.sum_mul_comp_perm_lt_sum_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary_on" ]
**Strict inequality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` do not monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_mul_le_sum_mul (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f (σ i) * g i ≤ ∑ i in s, f i * g i
hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul hσ
lemma
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_mul_le_sum_mul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary_on" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g` is maximized when `f` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_mul_eq_sum_mul_iff (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f (σ i) * g i = ∑ i in s, f i * g i ↔ monovary_on (f ∘ σ) g s
hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ
lemma
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_mul_eq_sum_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary_on" ]
**Equality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_mul_lt_sum_mul_iff (hfg : monovary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f (σ i) * g i < ∑ i in s, f i * g i ↔ ¬ monovary_on (f ∘ σ) g s
hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff hσ
lemma
monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_mul_lt_sum_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary_on" ]
**Strict inequality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` do not monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_mul_le_sum_mul_comp_perm (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i * g i ≤ ∑ i in s, f i * g (σ i)
hfg.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm hσ
lemma
antivary_on.sum_mul_le_sum_mul_comp_perm
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g` is minimized when `f` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_mul_eq_sum_mul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i * g (σ i) = ∑ i in s, f i * g i ↔ antivary_on f (g ∘ σ) s
hfg.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff hσ
lemma
antivary_on.sum_mul_eq_sum_mul_comp_perm_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on" ]
**Equality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_mul_lt_sum_mul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i * g i < ∑ i in s, f i * g (σ i) ↔ ¬ antivary_on f (g ∘ σ) s
hfg.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff hσ
lemma
antivary_on.sum_mul_lt_sum_mul_comp_perm_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on" ]
**Strict inequality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` do not antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_mul_le_sum_comp_perm_mul (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i * g i ≤ ∑ i in s, f (σ i) * g i
hfg.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul hσ
lemma
antivary_on.sum_mul_le_sum_comp_perm_mul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g` is minimized when `f` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_mul_eq_sum_comp_perm_mul_iff (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f (σ i) * g i = ∑ i in s, f i * g i ↔ antivary_on (f ∘ σ) g s
hfg.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff hσ
lemma
antivary_on.sum_mul_eq_sum_comp_perm_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on" ]
**Equality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary_on.sum_mul_lt_sum_comp_perm_mul_iff (hfg : antivary_on f g s) (hσ : {x | σ x ≠ x} ⊆ s) : ∑ i in s, f i * g i < ∑ i in s, f (σ i) * g i ↔ ¬ antivary_on (f ∘ σ) g s
hfg.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff hσ
lemma
antivary_on.sum_mul_lt_sum_comp_perm_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary_on" ]
**Strict inequality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` do not antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_mul_comp_perm_le_sum_mul (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f i * g (σ i) ≤ ∑ i, f i * g i
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
lemma
monovary.sum_mul_comp_perm_le_sum_mul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g` is maximized when `f` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_mul_comp_perm_eq_sum_mul_iff (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f i * g (σ i) = ∑ i, f i * g i ↔ monovary f (g ∘ σ)
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff
lemma
monovary.sum_mul_comp_perm_eq_sum_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Equality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_mul_comp_perm_lt_sum_mul_iff (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f i * g (σ i) < ∑ i, f i * g i ↔ ¬ monovary f (g ∘ σ)
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff
lemma
monovary.sum_mul_comp_perm_lt_sum_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Strict inequality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` do not monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_comp_perm_mul_le_sum_mul (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f (σ i) * g i ≤ ∑ i, f i * g i
hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul
lemma
monovary.sum_comp_perm_mul_le_sum_mul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g` is maximized when `f` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_comp_perm_mul_eq_sum_mul_iff (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f (σ i) * g i = ∑ i, f i * g i ↔ monovary (f ∘ σ) g
hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff
lemma
monovary.sum_comp_perm_mul_eq_sum_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Equality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
monovary.sum_comp_perm_mul_lt_sum_mul_iff (hfg : monovary f g) : ∑ i, f (σ i) * g i < ∑ i, f i * g i ↔ ¬ monovary (f ∘ σ) g
hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff
lemma
monovary.sum_comp_perm_mul_lt_sum_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "monovary" ]
**Strict inequality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which monovary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` do not monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_mul_le_sum_mul_comp_perm (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f i * g i ≤ ∑ i, f i * g (σ i)
hfg.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm
lemma
antivary.sum_mul_le_sum_mul_comp_perm
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g` is minimized when `f` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_mul_eq_sum_mul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f i * g (σ i) = ∑ i, f i * g i ↔ antivary f (g ∘ σ)
hfg.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
lemma
antivary.sum_mul_eq_sum_mul_comp_perm_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Equality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_mul_lt_sum_mul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f i • g i < ∑ i, f i • g (σ i) ↔ ¬ antivary f (g ∘ σ)
hfg.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
lemma
antivary.sum_mul_lt_sum_mul_comp_perm_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Strict inequality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` do not antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_mul_le_sum_comp_perm_mul (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f i * g i ≤ ∑ i, f (σ i) * g i
hfg.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul
lemma
antivary.sum_mul_le_sum_comp_perm_mul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g` is minimized when `f` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_mul_eq_sum_comp_perm_mul_iff (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f (σ i) * g i = ∑ i, f i * g i ↔ antivary (f ∘ σ) g
hfg.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff
lemma
antivary.sum_mul_eq_sum_comp_perm_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Equality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
antivary.sum_mul_lt_sum_comp_perm_mul_iff (hfg : antivary f g) : ∑ i, f i * g i < ∑ i, f (σ i) * g i ↔ ¬ antivary (f ∘ σ) g
hfg.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff
lemma
antivary.sum_mul_lt_sum_comp_perm_mul_iff
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/rearrangement.lean
[ "algebra.big_operators.basic", "algebra.order.module", "data.prod.lex", "group_theory.perm.support", "order.monotone.monovary", "tactic.abel" ]
[ "antivary" ]
**Strict inequality case of the Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise multiplication of `f` and `g`, which antivary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` do not antivary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ordered_smul (R M : Type*) [ordered_semiring R] [ordered_add_comm_monoid M] [smul_with_zero R M] : Prop
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos : ∀ {a b : M}, ∀ {c : R}, a < b → 0 < c → c • a < c • b) (lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_pos : ∀ {a b : M}, ∀ {c : R}, c • a < c • b → 0 < c → a < b)
class
ordered_smul
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/smul.lean
[ "algebra.module.pi", "algebra.module.prod", "algebra.order.monoid.prod", "algebra.order.pi", "data.set.pointwise.smul", "tactic.positivity" ]
[ "ordered_add_comm_monoid", "ordered_semiring", "smul_lt_smul_of_pos", "smul_with_zero" ]
The ordered scalar product property is when an ordered additive commutative monoid with a partial order has a scalar multiplication which is compatible with the order.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_lt_smul_of_pos : a < b → 0 < c → c • a < c • b
ordered_smul.smul_lt_smul_of_pos
lemma
smul_lt_smul_of_pos
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/smul.lean
[ "algebra.module.pi", "algebra.module.prod", "algebra.order.monoid.prod", "algebra.order.pi", "data.set.pointwise.smul", "tactic.positivity" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_le_smul_of_nonneg (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : 0 ≤ c) : c • a ≤ c • b
begin rcases h₁.eq_or_lt with rfl|hab, { refl }, { rcases h₂.eq_or_lt with rfl|hc, { rw [zero_smul, zero_smul] }, { exact (smul_lt_smul_of_pos hab hc).le } } end
lemma
smul_le_smul_of_nonneg
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/smul.lean
[ "algebra.module.pi", "algebra.module.prod", "algebra.order.monoid.prod", "algebra.order.pi", "data.set.pointwise.smul", "tactic.positivity" ]
[ "smul_lt_smul_of_pos", "zero_smul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_nonneg (hc : 0 ≤ c) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 0 ≤ c • a
calc (0 : M) = c • (0 : M) : (smul_zero c).symm ... ≤ c • a : smul_le_smul_of_nonneg ha hc
lemma
smul_nonneg
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/smul.lean
[ "algebra.module.pi", "algebra.module.prod", "algebra.order.monoid.prod", "algebra.order.pi", "data.set.pointwise.smul", "tactic.positivity" ]
[ "smul_le_smul_of_nonneg", "smul_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
smul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (hc : 0 ≤ c) (ha : a ≤ 0) : c • a ≤ 0
@smul_nonneg R Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ hc ha
lemma
smul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/smul.lean
[ "algebra.module.pi", "algebra.module.prod", "algebra.order.monoid.prod", "algebra.order.pi", "data.set.pointwise.smul", "tactic.positivity" ]
[ "smul_nonneg" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_of_smul_eq_smul_of_pos_of_le (h₁ : c • a = c • b) (hc : 0 < c) (hle : a ≤ b) : a = b
hle.lt_or_eq.resolve_left $ λ hlt, (smul_lt_smul_of_pos hlt hc).ne h₁
lemma
eq_of_smul_eq_smul_of_pos_of_le
algebra.order
src/algebra/order/smul.lean
[ "algebra.module.pi", "algebra.module.prod", "algebra.order.monoid.prod", "algebra.order.pi", "data.set.pointwise.smul", "tactic.positivity" ]
[ "smul_lt_smul_of_pos" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83