statement
stringlengths
1
2.88k
proof
stringlengths
0
13.9k
type
stringclasses
10 values
symbolic_name
stringlengths
1
131
library
stringclasses
417 values
filename
stringlengths
17
80
imports
listlengths
0
16
deps
listlengths
0
64
docstring
stringlengths
0
10.2k
source_url
stringclasses
1 value
commit
stringclasses
1 value
direct_dependencies_of_hyp_inclusive (h : expr) : tactic (list expr)
rb_set.to_list <$> direct_dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive h
def
tactic.direct_dependencies_of_hyp_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`direct_dependencies_of_hyp_inclusive h` is the list of hypotheses that the hypothesis `h` directly depends on, plus `h` itself. The dependencies are returned in no particular order.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyp_depends_on_local_name_set' : expr_set → expr → name_set → tactic (bool × expr_set)
λ cache h ns, do ff ← pure $ cache.contains h | pure (ff, cache), direct_deps ← direct_dependency_set_of_hyp h, let has_dep := direct_deps.fold ff (λ d b, b || ns.contains d.local_uniq_name), ff ← pure has_dep | pure (tt, cache), (has_dep, cache) ← direct_deps.mfold (ff, cache) $ λ d ⟨b, cache⟩, if b ...
def
tactic.hyp_depends_on_local_name_set'
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyp_depends_on_local_name_set' cache h ns` is true iff `h` depends on any of the hypotheses whose unique names appear in `ns`. `cache` must be a set of hypotheses known *not* to depend (even indirectly) on any of the `ns`. This is a performance optimisation, so you can give an empty cache. The tactic also returns an e...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyp_depends_on_local_name_set (h : expr) (ns : name_set) : tactic bool
do ctx_has_local_def ← context_upto_hyp_has_local_def h, if ctx_has_local_def then prod.fst <$> hyp_depends_on_local_name_set' mk_expr_set h ns else hyp_directly_depends_on_local_name_set h ns
def
tactic.hyp_depends_on_local_name_set
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyp_depends_on_local_name_set h ns` is true iff the hypothesis `h` depends on any of the hypotheses whose unique names appear in `ns`. If you need to check dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.hyps_depend_on_local_name_set`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyp_depends_on_local_set (h : expr) (hs : expr_set) : tactic bool
hyp_depends_on_local_name_set h $ local_set_to_name_set hs
def
tactic.hyp_depends_on_local_set
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyp_depends_on_local_set h hs` is true iff the hypothesis `h` depends on any of the hypotheses `hs`. If you need to check dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.hyps_depend_on_local_set`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyp_depends_on_locals (h : expr) (hs : list expr) : tactic bool
hyp_depends_on_local_name_set h $ local_list_to_name_set hs
def
tactic.hyp_depends_on_locals
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyp_depends_on_locals h hs` is true iff the hypothesis `h` depends on any of the hypotheses `hs`. If you need to check dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.hyps_depend_on_locals`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyps_depend_on_local_name_set (hs : list expr) (ns : name_set) : tactic (list bool)
do ctx_has_local ← context_has_local_def, if ctx_has_local then let go : expr → list bool × expr_set → tactic (list bool × expr_set) := λ h ⟨deps, cache⟩, do { (h_dep, cache) ← hyp_depends_on_local_name_set' cache h ns, pure (h_dep :: deps, cache) } in prod.fst <$> hs.mfold...
def
tactic.hyps_depend_on_local_name_set
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyps_depend_on_local_name_set hs ns` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, whether `h` depends on a hypothesis whose unique name appears in `ns`. This is the same as (but more efficient than) calling `tactic.hyp_depends_on_local_name_set` for every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyps_depend_on_local_set (hs : list expr) (is : expr_set) : tactic (list bool)
hyps_depend_on_local_name_set hs $ local_set_to_name_set is
def
tactic.hyps_depend_on_local_set
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyps_depend_on_local_set hs is` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, whether `h` depends on any of the hypotheses `is`. This is the same as (but more efficient than) calling `tactic.hyp_depends_on_local_set` for every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyps_depend_on_locals (hs is : list expr) : tactic (list bool)
hyps_depend_on_local_name_set hs $ local_list_to_name_set is
def
tactic.hyps_depend_on_locals
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyps_depend_on_locals hs is` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, whether `h` depends on any of the hypotheses `is`. This is the same as (but more efficient than) calling `tactic.hyp_depends_on_locals` for every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyp_depends_on_local_name_set_inclusive' (cache : expr_set) (h : expr) (ns : name_set) : tactic (bool × expr_set)
if ns.contains h.local_uniq_name then pure (tt, cache) else hyp_depends_on_local_name_set' cache h ns
def
tactic.hyp_depends_on_local_name_set_inclusive'
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyp_depends_on_local_name_set_inclusive' cache h ns` is true iff the hypothesis `h` inclusively depends on a hypothesis whose unique name appears in `ns`. `cache` must be a set of hypotheses known *not* to depend (even indirectly) on any of the `ns`. This is a performance optimisation, so you can give an empty cache. ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyp_depends_on_local_name_set_inclusive (h : expr) (ns : name_set) : tactic bool
list.mbor [ pure $ ns.contains h.local_uniq_name, hyp_depends_on_local_name_set h ns ]
def
tactic.hyp_depends_on_local_name_set_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[ "list.mbor" ]
`hyp_depends_on_local_name_set_inclusive h ns` is true iff the hypothesis `h` inclusively depends on any of the hypotheses whose unique names appear in `ns`. If you need to check the dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.hyps_depend_on_local_name_set_inclusive`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyp_depends_on_local_set_inclusive (h : expr) (hs : expr_set) : tactic bool
hyp_depends_on_local_name_set_inclusive h $ local_set_to_name_set hs
def
tactic.hyp_depends_on_local_set_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyp_depends_on_local_set_inclusive h hs` is true iff the hypothesis `h` inclusively depends on any of the hypotheses `hs`. If you need to check dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.hyps_depend_on_local_set_inclusive`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyp_depends_on_locals_inclusive (h : expr) (hs : list expr) : tactic bool
hyp_depends_on_local_name_set_inclusive h $ local_list_to_name_set hs
def
tactic.hyp_depends_on_locals_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyp_depends_on_locals_inclusive h hs` is true iff the hypothesis `h` inclusively depends on any of the hypotheses `hs`. If you need to check dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.hyps_depend_on_locals_inclusive`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyps_depend_on_local_name_set_inclusive (hs : list expr) (ns : name_set) : tactic (list bool)
do ctx_has_local ← context_has_local_def, if ctx_has_local then let go : expr → list bool × expr_set → tactic (list bool × expr_set) := λ h ⟨deps, cache⟩, do { (h_dep, cache) ← hyp_depends_on_local_name_set_inclusive' cache h ns, pure (h_dep :: deps, cache) } in prod.fst <$...
def
tactic.hyps_depend_on_local_name_set_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyps_depend_on_local_name_set_inclusive hs ns` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, whether `h` inclusively depends on a hypothesis whose unique name appears in `ns`. This is the same as (but more efficient than) calling `tactic.hyp_depends_on_local_name_set_inclusive` for every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyps_depend_on_local_set_inclusive (hs : list expr) (is : expr_set) : tactic (list bool)
hyps_depend_on_local_name_set_inclusive hs $ local_set_to_name_set is
def
tactic.hyps_depend_on_local_set_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyps_depend_on_local_set_inclusive hs is` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, whether `h` depends inclusively on any of the hypotheses `is`. This is the same as (but more efficient than) calling `tactic.hyp_depends_on_local_set_inclusive` for every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
hyps_depend_on_locals_inclusive (hs is : list expr) : tactic (list bool)
hyps_depend_on_local_name_set_inclusive hs $ local_list_to_name_set is
def
tactic.hyps_depend_on_locals_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`hyps_depend_on_locals_inclusive hs is` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, whether `h` depends inclusively on any of the hypotheses `is`. This is the same as (but more efficient than) calling `tactic.hyp_depends_on_locals_inclusive` for every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependency_set_of_hyp' : expr_map expr_set → expr → tactic (expr_set × expr_map expr_set)
λ cache h, do match cache.find h with | some deps := pure (deps, cache) | none := do direct_deps ← direct_dependency_set_of_hyp h, (deps, cache) ← direct_deps.mfold (direct_deps, cache) $ λ h' ⟨deps, cache⟩, do { (deps', cache) ← dependency_set_of_hyp' cache h', pure (deps.union deps',...
def
tactic.dependency_set_of_hyp'
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependency_set_of_hyp' cache h` is the set of dependencies of the hypothesis `h`. `cache` is a map from hypotheses to all their dependencies (including indirect dependencies). This is a performance optimisation, so you can give an empty cache. The tactic also returns an expanded cache with hypotheses which the tactic ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependency_set_of_hyp (h : expr) : tactic expr_set
do ctx_has_local ← context_upto_hyp_has_local_def h, if ctx_has_local then prod.fst <$> dependency_set_of_hyp' mk_expr_map h else direct_dependency_set_of_hyp h
def
tactic.dependency_set_of_hyp
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependency_set_of_hyp h` is the set of dependencies of the hypothesis `h`. If you need the dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.dependency_sets_of_hyps`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependency_name_set_of_hyp (h : expr) : tactic name_set
local_set_to_name_set <$> dependency_set_of_hyp h
def
tactic.dependency_name_set_of_hyp
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependency_name_set_of_hyp h` is the set of unique names of the dependencies of the hypothesis `h`. If you need the dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.dependency_name_sets_of_hyps`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependencies_of_hyp (h : expr) : tactic (list expr)
rb_set.to_list <$> dependency_set_of_hyp h
def
tactic.dependencies_of_hyp
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependencies_of_hyp h` is the list of dependencies of the hypothesis `h`. The dependencies are returned in no particular order. If you need the dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.dependencies_of_hyps`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependency_sets_of_hyps (hs : list expr) : tactic (list expr_set)
do ctx_has_def ← context_has_local_def, if ctx_has_def then let go : expr → list expr_set × expr_map expr_set → tactic (list expr_set × expr_map expr_set) := do λ h ⟨deps, cache⟩, do { (h_deps, cache) ← dependency_set_of_hyp' cache h, pure (h_deps :: deps, cache) } in...
def
tactic.dependency_sets_of_hyps
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependency_sets_of_hyps hs` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, the set of dependencies of `h`. This is the same as (but more performant than) using `tactic.dependency_set_of_hyp` on every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependency_name_sets_of_hyps (hs : list expr) : tactic (list name_set)
list.map local_set_to_name_set <$> dependency_sets_of_hyps hs
def
tactic.dependency_name_sets_of_hyps
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependency_name_sets_of_hyps hs` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, the set of unique names of the dependencies of `h`. This is the same as (but more performant than) using `tactic.dependency_name_set_of_hyp` on every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependencies_of_hyps (hs : list expr) : tactic (list (list expr))
list.map rb_set.to_list <$> dependency_sets_of_hyps hs
def
tactic.dependencies_of_hyps
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependencies_of_hyps hs` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, the dependencies of `h`. The dependencies appear in no particular order in the returned lists. This is the same as (but more performant than) using `tactic.dependencies_of_hyp` on every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive' (cache : expr_map expr_set) (h : expr) : tactic (expr_set × expr_map expr_set)
do (deps, cache) ← dependency_set_of_hyp' cache h, pure (deps.insert h, cache)
def
tactic.dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive'
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive' cache h` is the set of dependencies of the hypothesis `h`, plus `h` itself. `cache` is a map from hypotheses to all their dependencies (including indirect dependencies). This is a performance optimisation, so you can give an empty cache. The tactic also returns an expanded cache with h...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive (h : expr) : tactic expr_set
do deps ← dependency_set_of_hyp h, pure $ deps.insert h
def
tactic.dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive h` is the set of dependencies of the hypothesis `h`, plus `h` itself. If you need the dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.dependency_sets_of_hyps_inclusive`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependency_name_set_of_hyp_inclusive (h : expr) : tactic name_set
local_set_to_name_set <$> dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive h
def
tactic.dependency_name_set_of_hyp_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependency_name_set_of_hyp_inclusive h` is the set of unique names of the dependencies of the hypothesis `h`, plus the unique name of `h` itself. If you need the dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.dependency_name_sets_of_hyps_inclusive`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependencies_of_hyp_inclusive (h : expr) : tactic (list expr)
rb_set.to_list <$> dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive h
def
tactic.dependencies_of_hyp_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependencies_of_hyp_inclusive h` is the list of dependencies of the hypothesis `h`, plus `h` itself. The dependencies are returned in no particular order. If you need the dependencies of multiple hypotheses, use `tactic.dependencies_of_hyps_inclusive`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependency_sets_of_hyps_inclusive (hs : list expr) : tactic (list expr_set)
do ctx_has_def ← context_has_local_def, if ctx_has_def then let go : expr → list expr_set × expr_map expr_set → tactic (list expr_set × expr_map expr_set) := λ h ⟨deps, cache⟩, do { (h_deps, cache) ← dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive' cache h, pure (h_deps :: deps, cache) } ...
def
tactic.dependency_sets_of_hyps_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependency_sets_of_hyps_inclusive hs` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, the dependencies of `h`, plus `h` itself. This is the same as (but more performant than) using `tactic.dependency_set_of_hyp_inclusive` on every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependency_name_sets_of_hyps_inclusive (hs : list expr) : tactic (list name_set)
list.map local_set_to_name_set <$> dependency_sets_of_hyps_inclusive hs
def
tactic.dependency_name_sets_of_hyps_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependency_name_sets_of_hyps_inclusive hs` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, the unique names of the dependencies of `h`, plus the unique name of `h` itself. This is the same as (but more performant than) using `tactic.dependency_name_set_of_hyp_inclusive` on every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
dependencies_of_hyps_inclusive (hs : list expr) : tactic (list (list expr))
list.map rb_set.to_list <$> dependency_sets_of_hyps_inclusive hs
def
tactic.dependencies_of_hyps_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`dependencies_of_hyps_inclusive hs` returns, for each `h ∈ hs`, the dependencies of `h`, plus `h` itself. The dependencies appear in no particular order in the returned lists. This is the same as (but more performant than) using `tactic.dependencies_of_hyp_inclusive` on every `h ∈ hs`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_aux (hs : name_set) : list expr → list expr → name_set → tactic (list expr)
| [] revdeps _ := pure revdeps.reverse | (H :: Hs) revdeps ns := do let H_uname := H.local_uniq_name, H_is_revdep ← list.mband [ pure $ ¬ hs.contains H_uname, hyp_directly_depends_on_local_name_set H ns ], if H_is_revdep then reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_aux Hs (H :: revdeps) (...
def
tactic.reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_aux
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[ "list.mband" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set (hs : name_set) : tactic (list expr)
do ctx ← local_context, let ctx := ctx.after (λ h, hs.contains h.local_uniq_name), reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_aux hs ctx [] hs
def
tactic.reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set hs` is the list of reverse dependencies of the hypotheses whose unique names appear in `hs`, excluding the `hs` themselves. The reverse dependencies are returned in the order in which they appear in the context.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_set (hs : expr_set) : tactic (list expr)
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set $ local_set_to_name_set hs
def
tactic.reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_set
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_set hs` is the list of reverse dependencies of the hypotheses `hs`, excluding the `hs` themselves. The reverse dependencies are returned in the order in which they appear in the context.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
reverse_dependencies_of_hyps (hs : list expr) : tactic (list expr)
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set $ local_list_to_name_set hs
def
tactic.reverse_dependencies_of_hyps
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`reverse_dependencies_of_hyps hs` is the list of reverse dependencies of the hypotheses `hs`, excluding the `hs` themselves. The reverse dependencies are returned in the order in which they appear in the context.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_inclusive_aux : list expr → list expr → name_set → tactic (list expr)
| [] revdeps _ := pure revdeps.reverse | (H :: Hs) revdeps ns := do let H_uname := H.local_uniq_name, H_is_revdep ← list.mbor [ pure $ ns.contains H.local_uniq_name, hyp_directly_depends_on_local_name_set H ns ], if H_is_revdep then reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_inclusive_aux Hs (H :: r...
def
tactic.reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_inclusive_aux
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[ "list.mbor" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_inclusive (hs : name_set) : tactic (list expr)
do ctx ← local_context, let ctx := ctx.drop_while (λ h, ¬ hs.contains h.local_uniq_name), reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_inclusive_aux ctx [] hs
def
tactic.reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_inclusive hs` is the list of reverse dependencies of the hypotheses whose unique names appear in `hs`, including the `hs` themselves. The reverse dependencies are returned in the order in which they appear in the context.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_set_inclusive (hs : expr_set) : tactic (list expr)
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_inclusive $ local_set_to_name_set hs
def
tactic.reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_set_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_set_inclusive hs` is the list of reverse dependencies of the hypotheses `hs`, including the `hs` themselves. The inclusive reverse dependencies are returned in the order in which they appear in the context.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
reverse_dependencies_of_hyps_inclusive (hs : list expr) : tactic (list expr)
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_inclusive $ local_list_to_name_set hs
def
tactic.reverse_dependencies_of_hyps_inclusive
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`reverse_dependencies_of_hyps_inclusive hs` is the list of reverse dependencies of the hypotheses `hs`, including the `hs` themselves. The reverse dependencies are returned in the order in which they appear in the context.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
revert_name_set (hs : name_set) : tactic (ℕ × list expr)
do to_revert ← reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set_inclusive hs, to_revert_with_types ← to_revert.mmap update_type, num_reverted ← revert_lst to_revert, pure (num_reverted, to_revert_with_types)
def
tactic.revert_name_set
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`revert_name_set hs` reverts the hypotheses whose unique names appear in `hs`, as well as any hypotheses that depend on them. Returns the number of reverted hypotheses and a list containing these hypotheses. The reverted hypotheses are returned in the order in which they used to appear in the context and are guaranteed...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
revert_set (hs : expr_set) : tactic (ℕ × list expr)
revert_name_set $ local_set_to_name_set hs
def
tactic.revert_set
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`revert_set hs` reverts the hypotheses `hs`, as well as any hypotheses that depend on them. Returns the number of reverted hypotheses and a list containing these hypotheses. The reverted hypotheses are returned in the order in which they used to appear in the context and are guaranteed to store the correct type (see `t...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
revert_lst' (hs : list expr) : tactic (ℕ × list expr)
revert_name_set $ local_list_to_name_set hs
def
tactic.revert_lst'
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`revert_lst' hs` reverts the hypotheses `hs`, as well as any hypotheses that depend on them. Returns the number of reverted hypotheses and a list containing these hypotheses. The reverted hypotheses are returned in the order in which they used to appear in the context and are guaranteed to store the correct type (see `...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyp (h : expr) : tactic ℕ
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set (mk_name_set.insert h.local_uniq_name) >>= revert_lst
def
tactic.revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyp
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set (hs : name_set) : tactic ℕ
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set hs >>= revert_lst
def
tactic.revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_name_set hs` reverts all the hypotheses that depend on a hypothesis whose unique name appears in `hs`. The `hs` themselves are not reverted, unless they depend on each other. Returns the number of reverted hypotheses.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_set (hs : expr_set) : tactic ℕ
reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_set hs >>= revert_lst
def
tactic.revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_set
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyp_set hs` reverts all the hypotheses that depend on a hypothesis in `hs`. The `hs` themselves are not reverted, unless they depend on each other. Returns the number of reverted hypotheses.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyps (hs : list expr) : tactic ℕ
reverse_dependencies_of_hyps hs >>= revert_lst
def
tactic.revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyps
tactic
src/tactic/dependencies.lean
[ "meta.rb_map", "tactic.core" ]
[]
`revert_reverse_dependencies_of_hyp hs` reverts all the hypotheses that depend on a hypothesis in `hs`. The `hs` themselves are not reverted, unless they depend on each other. Returns the number of reverted hypotheses.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_above (α) (enum : α → ℕ) (n : ℕ)
{s : finset α // ∀ x ∈ s, n ≤ enum x}
def
derive_fintype.finset_above
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "finset" ]
A step in the construction of `finset.univ` for a finite inductive type. We will set `enum` to the discriminant of the inductive type, so a `finset_above` represents a finset that enumerates all elements in a tail of the constructor list.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mk_fintype {α} (enum : α → ℕ) (s : finset_above α enum 0) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s.1) : fintype α
⟨s.1, H⟩
def
derive_fintype.mk_fintype
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
Construct a fintype instance from a completed `finset_above`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_above.cons {α} {enum : α → ℕ} (n) (a : α) (h : enum a = n) (s : finset_above α enum (n+1)) : finset_above α enum n
begin refine ⟨finset.cons a s.1 _, _⟩, { intro h', have := s.2 _ h', rw h at this, exact nat.not_succ_le_self n this }, { intros x h', rcases finset.mem_cons.1 h' with rfl | h', { exact ge_of_eq h }, { exact nat.le_of_succ_le (s.2 _ h') } } end
def
derive_fintype.finset_above.cons
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "ge_of_eq" ]
This is the case for a simple variant (no arguments) in an inductive type.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_above.mem_cons_self {α} {enum : α → ℕ} {n a h s} : a ∈ (@finset_above.cons α enum n a h s).1
multiset.mem_cons_self _ _
theorem
derive_fintype.finset_above.mem_cons_self
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "multiset.mem_cons_self" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_above.mem_cons_of_mem {α} {enum : α → ℕ} {n a h s b} : b ∈ (s : finset_above _ _ _).1 → b ∈ (@finset_above.cons α enum n a h s).1
multiset.mem_cons_of_mem
theorem
derive_fintype.finset_above.mem_cons_of_mem
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "multiset.mem_cons_of_mem" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_above.nil {α} {enum : α → ℕ} (n) : finset_above α enum n
⟨∅, by rintro _ ⟨⟩⟩
def
derive_fintype.finset_above.nil
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[]
The base case is when we run out of variants; we just put an empty finset at the end.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_in {α} (P : α → Prop)
{s : finset α // ∀ x ∈ s, P x}
def
derive_fintype.finset_in
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "finset" ]
This is a finset covering a nontrivial variant (with one or more constructor arguments). The property `P` here is `λ a, enum a = n` where `n` is the discriminant for the current variant.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_in.mk {α} {P : α → Prop} (Γ) [fintype Γ] (f : Γ → α) (inj : function.injective f) (mem : ∀ x, P (f x)) : finset_in P
⟨finset.univ.map ⟨f, inj⟩, λ x h, by rcases finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨x, _, rfl⟩; exact mem x⟩
def
derive_fintype.finset_in.mk
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
To construct the finset, we use an injective map from the type `Γ`, which will be the sigma over all constructor arguments. We use sigma instances and existing fintype instances to prove that `Γ` is a fintype, and construct the function `f` that maps `⟨a, b, c, ...⟩` to `C_n a b c ...` where `C_n` is the nth constructo...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_in.mem_mk {α} {P : α → Prop} {Γ} {s : fintype Γ} {f : Γ → α} {inj mem a} (b) (H : f b = a) : a ∈ (@finset_in.mk α P Γ s f inj mem).1
finset.mem_map.2 ⟨_, finset.mem_univ _, H⟩
theorem
derive_fintype.finset_in.mem_mk
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "finset.mem_univ", "fintype" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_above.union {α} {enum : α → ℕ} (n) (s : finset_in (λ a, enum a = n)) (t : finset_above α enum (n+1)) : finset_above α enum n
begin refine ⟨finset.disj_union s.1 t.1 _, _⟩, { rw finset.disjoint_left, intros a hs ht, have := t.2 _ ht, rw s.2 _ hs at this, exact nat.not_succ_le_self n this }, { intros x h', rcases finset.mem_disj_union.1 h' with h' | h', { exact ge_of_eq (s.2 _ h') }, { exact nat.le_of_succ_le (t.2 _ h...
def
derive_fintype.finset_above.union
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "finset.disjoint_left", "ge_of_eq" ]
For nontrivial variants, we split the constructor list into a `finset_in` component for the current constructor and a `finset_above` for the rest.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_above.mem_union_left {α} {enum : α → ℕ} {n s t a} (H : a ∈ (s : finset_in _).1) : a ∈ (@finset_above.union α enum n s t).1
multiset.mem_add.2 (or.inl H)
theorem
derive_fintype.finset_above.mem_union_left
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
finset_above.mem_union_right {α} {enum : α → ℕ} {n s t a} (H : a ∈ (t : finset_above _ _ _).1) : a ∈ (@finset_above.union α enum n s t).1
multiset.mem_add.2 (or.inr H)
theorem
derive_fintype.finset_above.mem_union_right
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mk_sigma : expr → tactic expr
| (expr.pi n bi d b) := do p ← mk_local' n bi d, e ← mk_sigma (expr.instantiate_var b p), tactic.mk_app ``psigma [d, bind_lambda e p] | _ := pure `(unit)
def
tactic.derive_fintype.mk_sigma
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[]
Construct the term `Σ' (a:A) (b:B a) (c:C a b), unit` from `Π (a:A) (b:B a), C a b → T` (the type of a constructor).
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mk_sigma_elim : expr → expr → tactic ℕ
| (expr.pi n bi d b) c := do refine ``(@psigma.elim %%d _ _ _), i ← intro_fresh n, (+ 1) <$> mk_sigma_elim (expr.instantiate_var b i) (c i) | _ c := do intro1, exact c $> 0
def
tactic.derive_fintype.mk_sigma_elim
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[]
Prove the goal `(Σ' (a:A) (b:B a) (c:C a b), unit) → T` (this is the function `f` in `finset_in.mk`) using recursive `psigma.elim`, finishing with the constructor. The two arguments are the type of the constructor, and the constructor term itself; as we recurse we add arguments to the constructor application and destru...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mk_sigma_elim_inj : ℕ → expr → expr → tactic unit
| (m+1) x y := do [(_, [x1, x2])] ← cases x, [(_, [y1, y2])] ← cases y, mk_sigma_elim_inj m x2 y2 | 0 x y := do cases x, cases y, is ← intro1 >>= injection, is.mmap' cases, reflexivity
def
tactic.derive_fintype.mk_sigma_elim_inj
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[]
Prove the goal `a, b |- f a = f b → g a = g b` where `f` is the function we constructed in `mk_sigma_elim`, and `g` is some other term that gets built up and eventually closed by reflexivity. Here `a` and `b` have sigma types so the proof approach is to case on `a` and `b` until the goal reduces to `C_n a1 ... am = C_n...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mk_sigma_elim_eq : ℕ → expr → tactic unit
| (n+1) x := do [(_, [x1, x2])] ← cases x, mk_sigma_elim_eq n x2 | 0 x := reflexivity
def
tactic.derive_fintype.mk_sigma_elim_eq
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[]
Prove the goal `a |- enum (f a) = n`, where `f` is the function constructed in `mk_sigma_elim`, and `enum` is a function that reduces to `n` on the constructor `C_n`. Here we just have to case on `a` `m` times, and then `reflexivity` finishes the proof.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mk_finset (ls : list level) (args : list expr) : ℕ → list name → tactic unit
| k (c::cs) := do let e := (expr.const c ls).mk_app args, t ← infer_type e, if is_pi t then do to_expr ``(finset_above.union %%(reflect k)) tt ff >>= (λ c, apply c {new_goals := new_goals.all}), Γ ← mk_sigma t, to_expr ``(finset_in.mk %%Γ) tt ff >>= (λ c, apply c {new_goals := new_goals.all}), ...
def
tactic.derive_fintype.mk_finset
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[]
Prove the goal `|- finset_above T enum k`, where `T` is the inductive type and `enum` is the discriminant function. The arguments are `args`, the parameters to the inductive type (and all constructors), `k`, the index of the current variant, and `cs`, the list of constructor names. This uses `finset_above.cons` for bas...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mk_sigma_mem : list expr → tactic unit
| (x::xs) := fconstructor >> exact x >> mk_sigma_mem xs | [] := fconstructor $> ()
def
tactic.derive_fintype.mk_sigma_mem
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[]
Prove the goal `|- Σ' (a:A) (b: B a) (c:C a b), unit` given a list of terms `a, b, c`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mk_finset_total : tactic unit → list (name × list expr) → tactic unit
| tac [] := done | tac ((_, xs) :: gs) := do tac, b ← succeeds (applyc ``finset_above.mem_cons_self), if b then mk_finset_total (tac >> applyc ``finset_above.mem_cons_of_mem) gs else do applyc ``finset_above.mem_union_left, applyc ``finset_in.mem_mk {new_goals := new_goals.all}, mk_sigma_mem xs,...
def
tactic.derive_fintype.mk_finset_total
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "succeeds" ]
This function is called to prove `a : T |- a ∈ S.1` where `S` is the `finset_above` constructed by `mk_finset`, after the initial cases on `a : T`, producing a list of subgoals. For each case, we have to navigate past all the variants that don't apply (which is what the `tac` input tactic does), and then call either `f...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mk_fintype_instance : tactic unit
do intros, `(fintype %%e) ← target >>= whnf, (const I ls, args) ← pure (get_app_fn_args e), env ← get_env, let cs := env.constructors_of I, guard (env.inductive_num_indices I = 0) <|> fail "@[derive fintype]: inductive indices are not supported", guard (¬ env.is_recursive I) <|> fail ("@[derive fi...
def
tactic.mk_fintype_instance
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[]
Proves `|- fintype T` where `T` is a non-recursive inductive type with no indices, where all arguments to all constructors are fintypes.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
fintype_instance : derive_handler
instance_derive_handler ``fintype mk_fintype_instance
def
tactic.fintype_instance
tactic
src/tactic/derive_fintype.lean
[ "data.fintype.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
Tries to derive a `fintype` instance for inductives and structures. For example: ``` @[derive fintype] inductive foo (n m : ℕ) | zero : foo | one : bool → foo | two : fin n → fin m → foo ``` Here, `@[derive fintype]` adds the instance `foo.fintype`. The underlying finset definitionally unfolds to a list that enumerate...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
inhabited_instance : derive_handler
instance_derive_handler ``inhabited $ do applyc ``inhabited.mk, `[refine {..}] <|> (constructor >> skip), all_goals' $ do applyc ``default <|> (do s ← read, fail $ to_fmt "could not find inhabited instance for:\n" ++ to_fmt s)
def
tactic.inhabited_instance
tactic
src/tactic/derive_inhabited.lean
[ "logic.basic", "data.rbmap.basic" ]
[]
Tries to derive an `inhabited` instance for inductives and structures. For example: ``` @[derive inhabited] structure foo := (a : ℕ := 42) (b : list ℕ) ``` Here, `@[derive inhabited]` adds the instance `foo.inhabited`, which is defined as `⟨⟨42, default⟩⟩`. For inductives, the default value is the first constructor. ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
string.hash (s : string) : ℕ
s.fold 1 (λ h c, (33*h + c.val) % unsigned_sz)
def
string.hash
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[]
A rudimentary hash function on strings.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
name.last : name → string
| (name.mk_string s _) := s | (name.mk_numeral n _) := repr n | anonymous := "[anonymous]"
def
name.last
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[]
Get the last component of a name, and convert it to a string.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.copy_doc_string (fr : name) (to : list name) : tactic unit
do fr_ds ← doc_string fr, to.mmap' $ λ tgt, add_doc_string tgt fr_ds
def
tactic.copy_doc_string
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[]
`copy_doc_string fr to` copies the docstring from the declaration named `fr` to each declaration named in the list `to`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
copy_doc_string_cmd (_ : parse (tk "copy_doc_string")) : parser unit
do fr ← parser.ident, tk "->", to ← parser.many parser.ident, expr.const fr _ ← resolve_name fr, to ← parser.of_tactic (to.mmap $ λ n, expr.const_name <$> resolve_name n), tactic.copy_doc_string fr to
def
copy_doc_string_cmd
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "tactic.copy_doc_string" ]
`copy_doc_string source → target_1 target_2 ... target_n` copies the doc string of the declaration named `source` to each of `target_1`, `target_2`, ..., `target_n`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
library_note_attr : user_attribute
{ name := `library_note, descr := "Notes about library features to be included in documentation", parser := failed }
def
library_note_attr
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "library_note" ]
A user attribute `library_note` for tagging decls of type `string × string` for use in note output.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mk_reflected_definition (decl_name : name) {type} [reflected _ type] (body : type) [reflected _ body] : declaration
mk_definition decl_name (reflect type).collect_univ_params (reflect type) (reflect body)
def
mk_reflected_definition
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[]
`mk_reflected_definition name val` constructs a definition declaration by reflection. Example: ``mk_reflected_definition `foo 17`` constructs the definition declaration corresponding to `def foo : ℕ := 17`
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.add_library_note (note_name note : string) : tactic unit
do let decl_name := `library_note <.> note_name, add_decl $ mk_reflected_definition decl_name (), add_doc_string decl_name note, library_note_attr.set decl_name () tt none
def
tactic.add_library_note
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "library_note", "mk_reflected_definition" ]
If `note_name` and `note` are strings, `add_library_note note_name note` adds a declaration named `library_note.<note_name>` with `note` as the docstring and tags it with the `library_note` attribute.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
library_note (mi : interactive.decl_meta_info) (_ : parse (tk "library_note")) : parser unit
do note_name ← parser.pexpr, note_name ← eval_pexpr string note_name, some doc_string ← pure mi.doc_string | fail "library_note requires a doc string", add_library_note note_name doc_string
def
library_note
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[]
A command to add library notes. Syntax: ``` /-- note message -/ library_note "note id" ```
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.get_library_notes : tactic (list (string × string))
attribute.get_instances `library_note >>= list.mmap (λ dcl, prod.mk dcl.last <$> doc_string dcl)
def
tactic.get_library_notes
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "library_note" ]
Collects all notes in the current environment. Returns a list of pairs `(note_id, note_content)`
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
doc_category | tactic | cmd | hole_cmd | attr
inductive
doc_category
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[]
The categories of tactic doc entry.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
doc_category.to_string : doc_category → string
| doc_category.tactic := "tactic" | doc_category.cmd := "command" | doc_category.hole_cmd := "hole_command" | doc_category.attr := "attribute"
def
doc_category.to_string
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "doc_category" ]
Format a `doc_category`
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic_doc_entry
(name : string) (category : doc_category) (decl_names : list _root_.name) (tags : list string := []) (inherit_description_from : option _root_.name := none)
structure
tactic_doc_entry
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "doc_category" ]
The information used to generate a tactic doc entry
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic_doc_entry.to_json (d : tactic_doc_entry) (desc : string) : json
json.object [ ("name", d.name), ("category", d.category.to_string), ("decl_names", d.decl_names.map (json.of_string ∘ to_string)), ("tags", d.tags.map json.of_string), ("description", desc) ]
def
tactic_doc_entry.to_json
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "tactic_doc_entry" ]
Turns a `tactic_doc_entry` into a JSON representation.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic_doc_entry.has_to_string : has_to_string (tactic_doc_entry × string)
⟨λ ⟨doc, desc⟩, json.unparse (doc.to_json desc)⟩
instance
tactic_doc_entry.has_to_string
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "tactic_doc_entry" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic_doc_entry_attr : user_attribute
{ name := `tactic_doc, descr := "Information about a tactic to be included in documentation", parser := failed }
def
tactic_doc_entry_attr
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[]
A user attribute `tactic_doc` for tagging decls of type `tactic_doc_entry` for use in doc output
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.get_tactic_doc_entries : tactic (list (tactic_doc_entry × string))
attribute.get_instances `tactic_doc >>= list.mmap (λ dcl, prod.mk <$> (mk_const dcl >>= eval_expr tactic_doc_entry) <*> doc_string dcl)
def
tactic.get_tactic_doc_entries
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "tactic_doc_entry" ]
Collects everything in the environment tagged with the attribute `tactic_doc`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.add_tactic_doc (tde : tactic_doc_entry) (doc : option string) : tactic unit
do desc ← doc <|> (do inh_id ← match tde.inherit_description_from, tde.decl_names with | some inh_id, _ := pure inh_id | none, [inh_id] := pure inh_id | none, _ := fail "A tactic doc entry must either: 1. have a description written as a doc-string for the `add_tactic_doc` invocation, or 2. have a sing...
def
tactic.add_tactic_doc
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "tactic_doc_entry" ]
`add_tactic_doc tde` adds a declaration to the environment with `tde` as its body and tags it with the `tactic_doc` attribute. If `tde.decl_names` has exactly one entry `` `decl`` and if `tde.description` is the empty string, `add_tactic_doc` uses the doc string of `decl` as the description.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
add_tactic_doc_command (mi : interactive.decl_meta_info) (_ : parse $ tk "add_tactic_doc") : parser unit
do pe ← parser.pexpr, e ← eval_pexpr tactic_doc_entry pe, tactic.add_tactic_doc e mi.doc_string
def
add_tactic_doc_command
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[ "tactic.add_tactic_doc", "tactic_doc_entry" ]
A command used to add documentation for a tactic, command, hole command, or attribute. Usage: after defining an interactive tactic, command, or attribute, add its documentation as follows. ```lean /-- describe what the command does here -/ add_tactic_doc { name := "display name of the tactic", category := cat, dec...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
add_decl_doc_command (mi : interactive.decl_meta_info) (_ : parse $ tk "add_decl_doc") : parser unit
do n ← parser.ident, n ← resolve_constant n, some doc ← pure mi.doc_string | fail "add_decl_doc requires a doc string", add_doc_string n doc
def
add_decl_doc_command
tactic
src/tactic/doc_commands.lean
[]
[]
The `add_decl_doc` command is used to add a doc string to an existing declaration. ```lean def foo := 5 /-- Doc string for foo. -/ add_decl_doc foo ```
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
extract_category : expr → tactic expr
| `(@eq (@quiver.hom ._ (@category_struct.to_quiver _ (@category.to_category_struct _ %%S)) _ _) _ _) := pure S | _ := failed
def
tactic.extract_category
tactic
src/tactic/elementwise.lean
[ "category_theory.concrete_category.basic", "tactic.fresh_names", "tactic.reassoc_axiom", "tactic.slice" ]
[]
From an expression `f = g`, where `f g : X ⟶ Y` for some objects `X Y : V` with `[S : category V]`, extract the expression for `S`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
prove_elementwise (h : expr) : tactic (expr × expr × option name)
do (vs,t) ← infer_type h >>= open_pis, (f, g) ← match_eq t, S ← extract_category t <|> fail "no morphism equation found in statement", `(@quiver.hom _ %%H %%X %%Y) ← infer_type f, C ← infer_type X, CC_type ← to_expr ``(@concrete_category %%C %%S), (CC, CC_found) ← (do CC ← mk_instance CC_type, pure...
def
tactic.prove_elementwise
tactic
src/tactic/elementwise.lean
[ "category_theory.concrete_category.basic", "tactic.fresh_names", "tactic.reassoc_axiom", "tactic.slice" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
elementwise_lemma (n : name) (n' : name := n.append_suffix "_apply") : tactic unit
do d ← get_decl n, let c := @expr.const tt n d.univ_levels, (t'',pr',l') ← prove_elementwise c, let params := l'.to_list ++ d.univ_params, add_decl $ declaration.thm n' params t'' (pure pr'), copy_attribute `simp n n'
def
tactic.elementwise_lemma
tactic
src/tactic/elementwise.lean
[ "category_theory.concrete_category.basic", "tactic.fresh_names", "tactic.reassoc_axiom", "tactic.slice" ]
[]
(implementation for `@[elementwise]`) Given a declaration named `n` of the form `∀ ..., f = g`, proves a new lemma named `n'` of the form `∀ ... [concrete_category V] (x : X), f x = g x`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
elementwise_attr : user_attribute unit (option name)
{ name := `elementwise, descr := "create a companion lemma for a morphism equation applied to an element", parser := optional ident, after_set := some (λ n _ _, do some n' ← elementwise_attr.get_param n | elementwise_lemma n (n.append_suffix "_apply"), elementwise_lemma n $ n.get_prefix ++ n' ) }
def
tactic.elementwise_attr
tactic
src/tactic/elementwise.lean
[ "category_theory.concrete_category.basic", "tactic.fresh_names", "tactic.reassoc_axiom", "tactic.slice" ]
[]
The `elementwise` attribute can be applied to a lemma ```lean @[elementwise] lemma some_lemma {C : Type*} [category C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : X ⟶ Z) (w : ...) : f ≫ g = h := ... ``` and will produce ```lean lemma some_lemma_apply {C : Type*} [category C] [concrete_category C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
elementwise (del : parse (tk "!")?) (ns : parse ident*) : tactic unit
do ns.mmap' (λ n, do h ← get_local n, (t,pr,u) ← prove_elementwise h, assertv n t pr, when del.is_some (tactic.clear h) )
def
tactic.interactive.elementwise
tactic
src/tactic/elementwise.lean
[ "category_theory.concrete_category.basic", "tactic.fresh_names", "tactic.reassoc_axiom", "tactic.slice" ]
[]
`elementwise h`, for assumption `w : ∀ ..., f ≫ g = h`, creates a new assumption `w : ∀ ... (x : X), g (f x) = h x`. `elementwise! h`, does the same but deletes the initial `h` assumption. (You can also add the attribute `@[elementwise]` to lemmas to generate new declarations generalized in this way.)
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
derive_elementwise_proof : tactic unit
do `(calculated_Prop %%v %%h) ← target, (t,pr,n) ← prove_elementwise h, unify v t, exact pr
def
tactic.derive_elementwise_proof
tactic
src/tactic/elementwise.lean
[ "category_theory.concrete_category.basic", "tactic.fresh_names", "tactic.reassoc_axiom", "tactic.slice" ]
[]
Auxiliary definition for `category_theory.elementwise_of`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
category_theory.elementwise_of {α} (hh : α) {β} (x : tactic.calculated_Prop β hh . tactic.derive_elementwise_proof) : β
x
theorem
category_theory.elementwise_of
tactic
src/tactic/elementwise.lean
[ "category_theory.concrete_category.basic", "tactic.fresh_names", "tactic.reassoc_axiom", "tactic.slice" ]
[ "tactic.calculated_Prop", "tactic.derive_elementwise_proof" ]
With `w : ∀ ..., f ≫ g = h` (with universal quantifiers tolerated), `elementwise_of w : ∀ ... (x : X), g (f x) = h x`. The type and proof of `elementwise_of h` is generated by `tactic.derive_elementwise_proof` which makes `elementwise_of` meta-programming adjacent. It is not called as a tactic but as an expression. Th...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
replace : ℕ → expr → tactic expr
| 0 e := do t ← infer_type e, expr.sort u ← infer_type t, return $ (expr.const ``hidden [u]).app t e | (i+1) (expr.app f x) := do f' ← replace (i+1) f, x' ← replace i x, return (f' x') | (i+1) (expr.lam n b d e) := do d' ← replace i d, var ← mk_local' n b d, e' ← replace i (expr.instantiate_var e var)...
def
tactic.elide.replace
tactic
src/tactic/elide.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "hidden" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unelide (e : expr) : expr
expr.replace e $ λ e n, match e with | (expr.app (expr.app (expr.const n _) _) e') := if n = ``hidden then some e' else none | (expr.app (expr.lam _ _ _ (expr.var 0)) e') := some e' | _ := none end
def
tactic.elide.unelide
tactic
src/tactic/elide.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "hidden" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
elide (n : parse small_nat) (loc : parse location) : tactic unit
loc.apply (λ h, do t ← infer_type h >>= tactic.elide.replace n, tactic.change_core t (some h)) (target >>= tactic.elide.replace n >>= tactic.change)
def
tactic.interactive.elide
tactic
src/tactic/elide.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "tactic.change_core", "tactic.elide.replace" ]
The `elide n (at ...)` tactic hides all subterms of the target goal or hypotheses beyond depth `n` by replacing them with `hidden`, which is a variant on the identity function. (Tactics should still mostly be able to see through the abbreviation, but if you want to unhide the term you can use `unelide`.)
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unelide (loc : parse location) : tactic unit
loc.apply (λ h, do t ← infer_type h, tactic.change_core (elide.unelide t) (some h)) (target >>= tactic.change ∘ elide.unelide)
def
tactic.interactive.unelide
tactic
src/tactic/elide.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "tactic.change_core" ]
The `unelide (at ...)` tactic removes all `hidden` subterms in the target types (usually added by `elide`).
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
equiv_congr_lemmas : list (tactic expr)
[ `equiv.of_iff, -- TODO decide what to do with this; it's an equiv_bifunctor? `equiv.equiv_congr, -- The function arrow is technically a bifunctor `Typeᵒᵖ → Type → Type`, -- but the pattern matcher will never see this. `equiv.arrow_congr', -- Allow rewriting in subtypes: `equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype',...
def
tactic.equiv_congr_lemmas
tactic
src/tactic/equiv_rw.lean
[ "logic.equiv.defs", "tactic.clear", "tactic.simp_result", "tactic.apply", "control.equiv_functor.instances", "logic.equiv.functor" ]
[ "bifunctor.map_equiv", "equiv.Pi_congr_left'", "equiv.arrow_congr'", "equiv.equiv_congr", "equiv.forall_congr'", "equiv.forall₂_congr'", "equiv.forall₃_congr'", "equiv.of_iff", "equiv.refl", "equiv.sigma_congr_left'", "equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype'", "equiv_functor.map_equiv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
equiv_rw_cfg
(max_depth : ℕ := 10)
structure
tactic.equiv_rw_cfg
tactic
src/tactic/equiv_rw.lean
[ "logic.equiv.defs", "tactic.clear", "tactic.simp_result", "tactic.apply", "control.equiv_functor.instances", "logic.equiv.functor" ]
[]
Configuration structure for `equiv_rw`. * `max_depth` bounds the search depth for equivalences to rewrite along. The default value is 10. (e.g., if you're rewriting along `e : α ≃ β`, and `max_depth := 2`, you can rewrite `option (option α))` but not `option (option (option α))`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
equiv_rw_type_core (eq : expr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg) : tactic unit
do /- We now call `solve_by_elim` to try to generate the requested equivalence. There are a few subtleties! * We make sure that `eq` is the first lemma, so it is applied whenever possible. * In `equiv_congr_lemmas`, we put `equiv.refl` last so it is only used when it is not possible to descend f...
def
tactic.equiv_rw_type_core
tactic
src/tactic/equiv_rw.lean
[ "logic.equiv.defs", "tactic.clear", "tactic.simp_result", "tactic.apply", "control.equiv_functor.instances", "logic.equiv.functor" ]
[ "trace_if_enabled" ]
Implementation of `equiv_rw_type`, using `solve_by_elim`. Expects a goal of the form `t ≃ _`, and tries to solve it using `eq : α ≃ β` and congruence lemmas.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
equiv_rw_type (eqv : expr) (ty : expr) (cfg : equiv_rw_cfg) : tactic expr
do when_tracing `equiv_rw_type (do ty_pp ← pp ty, eqv_pp ← pp eqv, eqv_ty_pp ← infer_type eqv >>= pp, trace format!"Attempting to rewrite the type `{ty_pp}` using `{eqv_pp} : {eqv_ty_pp}`."), `(_ ≃ _) ← infer_type eqv | fail format!"{eqv} must be an `equiv`", -- We prepare a synthetic goal of type...
def
tactic.equiv_rw_type
tactic
src/tactic/equiv_rw.lean
[ "logic.equiv.defs", "tactic.clear", "tactic.simp_result", "tactic.apply", "control.equiv_functor.instances", "logic.equiv.functor" ]
[]
`equiv_rw_type e t` rewrites the type `t` using the equivalence `e : α ≃ β`, returning a new equivalence `t ≃ t'`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83