statement
stringlengths
1
2.88k
proof
stringlengths
0
13.9k
type
stringclasses
10 values
symbolic_name
stringlengths
1
131
library
stringclasses
417 values
filename
stringlengths
17
80
imports
listlengths
0
16
deps
listlengths
0
64
docstring
stringlengths
0
10.2k
source_url
stringclasses
1 value
commit
stringclasses
1 value
aux_attr : user_attribute (name_map name) name
{ name := `to_additive_aux, descr := "Auxiliary attribute for `to_additive`. DON'T USE IT", parser := failed, cache_cfg := ⟨λ ns, ns.mfoldl (λ dict n', do let n := match n' with | name.mk_string s pre := if s = "_to_addit...
def
to_additive.aux_attr
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[]
An auxiliary attribute used to store the names of the additive versions of declarations that have been processed by `to_additive`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
ignore_args_attr : user_attribute (name_map $ list ℕ) (list ℕ)
{ name := `to_additive_ignore_args, descr := "Auxiliary attribute for `to_additive` stating that certain arguments are not additivized.", cache_cfg := ⟨λ ns, ns.mfoldl (λ dict n, do param ← ignore_args_attr.get_param_untyped n, -- see Note [user attribute parameters] return $ ...
def
to_additive.ignore_args_attr
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[ "expr.to_nat" ]
An attribute that tells `@[to_additive]` that certain arguments of this definition are not involved when using `@[to_additive]`. This helps the heuristic of `@[to_additive]` by also transforming definitions if `ℕ` or another fixed type occurs as one of these arguments.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
relevant_arg_attr : user_attribute (name_map ℕ) ℕ
{ name := `to_additive_relevant_arg, descr := "Auxiliary attribute for `to_additive` stating which arguments are the types with a " ++ "multiplicative structure.", cache_cfg := ⟨λ ns, ns.mfoldl (λ dict n, do param ← relevant_arg_attr.get_param_untyped n, -- see Note [user attribut...
def
to_additive.relevant_arg_attr
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[]
An attribute that is automatically added to declarations tagged with `@[to_additive]`, if needed. This attribute tells which argument is the type where this declaration uses the multiplicative structure. If there are multiple argument, we typically tag the first one. If this argument contains a fixed type, this declar...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
reorder_attr : user_attribute (name_map $ list ℕ) (list ℕ)
{ name := `to_additive_reorder, descr := "Auxiliary attribute for `to_additive` that stores arguments that need to be reordered.", cache_cfg := ⟨λ ns, ns.mfoldl (λ dict n, do param ← reorder_attr.get_param_untyped n, -- see Note [user attribute parameters] return $ dict.insert...
def
to_additive.reorder_attr
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[ "expr.to_nat" ]
An attribute that stores all the declarations that needs their arguments reordered when applying `@[to_additive]`. Currently, we only support swapping consecutive arguments. The list of the natural numbers contains the positions of the first of the two arguments to be swapped. If the first two arguments are swapped, th...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
first_multiplicative_arg (nm : name) : tactic ℕ
do d ← get_decl nm, let (es, _) := d.type.pi_binders, l ← es.mmap_with_index $ λ n bi, do { let tgt := bi.type.pi_codomain, let n_bi := bi.type.pi_binders.fst.length, tt ← has_attribute' `to_additive tgt.get_app_fn.const_name | return none, let n2 := tgt.get_app_args.head.get_app_fn.match_var.map $ ...
def
to_additive.first_multiplicative_arg
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[]
Find the first argument of `nm` that has a multiplicative type-class on it. Returns 1 if there are no types with a multiplicative class as arguments. E.g. `prod.group` returns 1, and `pi.has_one` returns 2.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
map_namespace (src tgt : name) : command
do let n := src.mk_string "_to_additive", let decl := declaration.thm n [] `(unit) (pure (reflect ())), add_decl decl, aux_attr.set n tgt tt
def
to_additive.map_namespace
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[]
A command that can be used to have future uses of `to_additive` change the `src` namespace to the `tgt` namespace. For example: ``` run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `quotient_group `quotient_add_group ``` Later uses of `to_additive` on declarations in the `quotient_group` namespace will be created in the `quotient_a...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
value_type : Type
(replace_all : bool) (trace : bool) (tgt : name) (doc : option string) (allow_auto_name : bool)
structure
to_additive.value_type
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[]
`value_type` is the type of the arguments that can be provided to `to_additive`. `to_additive.parser` parses the provided arguments: * `replace_all`: replace all multiplicative declarations, do not use the heuristic. * `trace`: output the generated additive declaration. * `tgt : name`: the name of the target (the addit...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
add_comm_prefix : bool → string → string
| tt s := "comm_" ++ s | ff s := s
def
to_additive.add_comm_prefix
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[]
`add_comm_prefix x s` returns `"comm_" ++ s` if `x = tt` and `s` otherwise.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tr : bool → list string → list string
| is_comm ("one" :: "le" :: s) := add_comm_prefix is_comm "nonneg" :: tr ff s | is_comm ("one" :: "lt" :: s) := add_comm_prefix is_comm "pos" :: tr ff s | is_comm ("le" :: "one" :: s) := add_comm_prefix is_comm "nonpos" :: tr ff s | is_comm ("lt" :: "one" :: s) := add_comm_prefix...
def
to_additive.tr
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[]
Dictionary used by `to_additive.guess_name` to autogenerate names.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
guess_name : string → string
string.map_tokens ''' $ λ s, string.intercalate (string.singleton '_') $ tr ff (s.split_on '_')
def
to_additive.guess_name
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[ "string.map_tokens" ]
Autogenerate target name for `to_additive`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
target_name (src tgt : name) (dict : name_map name) (allow_auto_name : bool) : tactic name
(if tgt.get_prefix ≠ name.anonymous ∨ allow_auto_name -- `tgt` is a full name then pure tgt else match src with | (name.mk_string s pre) := do let tgt_auto := guess_name s, guard (tgt.to_string ≠ tgt_auto ∨ tgt = src) <|> trace ("`to_additive " ++ src.to_string ++ "`: correctly a...
def
to_additive.target_name
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[]
Return the provided target name or autogenerate one if one was not provided.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
parser : lean.parser value_type
do bang ← option.is_some <$> (tk "!")?, ques ← option.is_some <$> (tk "?")?, tgt ← ident?, e ← texpr?, doc ← match e with | some pe := some <$> ((to_expr pe >>= eval_expr string) : tactic string) | none := pure none end, return ⟨bang, ques, tgt.get_or_else name.anonymous, doc, ff⟩
def
to_additive.parser
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[]
the parser for the arguments to `to_additive`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
proceed_fields_aux (src tgt : name) (prio : ℕ) (f : name → tactic (list string)) : command
do src_fields ← f src, tgt_fields ← f tgt, guard (src_fields.length = tgt_fields.length) <|> fail ("Failed to map fields of " ++ src.to_string), (src_fields.zip tgt_fields).mmap' $ λ names, guard (names.fst = names.snd) <|> aux_attr.set (src.append names.fst) (tgt.append names.snd) tt prio
def
to_additive.proceed_fields_aux
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
proceed_fields (env : environment) (src tgt : name) (prio : ℕ) : command
let aux := proceed_fields_aux src tgt prio in do aux (λ n, pure $ list.map name.to_string $ (env.structure_fields n).get_or_else []) >> aux (λ n, (list.map (λ (x : name), "to_" ++ x.to_string) <$> get_tagged_ancestors n)) >> aux (λ n, (env.constructors_of n).mmap $ λ cs, match cs with | (name....
def
to_additive.proceed_fields
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[ "aux" ]
Add the `aux_attr` attribute to the structure fields of `src` so that future uses of `to_additive` will map them to the corresponding `tgt` fields.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
attr : user_attribute unit value_type
{ name := `to_additive, descr := "Transport multiplicative to additive", parser := parser, after_set := some $ λ src prio persistent, do guard persistent <|> fail "`to_additive` can't be used as a local attribute", env ← get_env, val ← attr.get_param src, dict ← aux_attr.get_cache, ...
def
to_additive.attr
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[ "continuity", "measurability", "tactic.alias.get_alias_target" ]
The attribute `to_additive` can be used to automatically transport theorems and definitions (but not inductive types and structures) from a multiplicative theory to an additive theory. To use this attribute, just write: ``` @[to_additive] theorem mul_comm' {α} [comm_semigroup α] (x y : α) : x * y = y * x := comm_semi...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
linter.to_additive_doc : linter
{ test := (λ d, do let mul_name := d.to_name, dict ← to_additive.aux_attr.get_cache, match dict.find mul_name with | some add_name := do mul_doc ← try_core $ doc_string mul_name, add_doc ← try_core $ doc_string add_name, match mul_doc.is_some, add_doc.is_some with | tt, ff := ret...
def
linter.to_additive_doc
tactic
src/tactic/to_additive.lean
[ "tactic.transform_decl", "tactic.algebra", "tactic.lint.basic", "tactic.alias" ]
[ "linter" ]
A linter that checks that multiplicative and additive lemmas have both doc strings if one of them has one
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rel_data
(in_type : expr) (out_type : expr) (relation : expr)
structure
transfer.rel_data
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
has_to_tactic_format_rel_data : has_to_tactic_format rel_data
⟨λr, do R ← pp r.relation, α ← pp r.in_type, β ← pp r.out_type, return format!"({R}: rel ({α}) ({β}))" ⟩
instance
transfer.has_to_tactic_format_rel_data
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
rule_data
(pr : expr) (uparams : list name) -- levels not in pat (params : list (expr × bool)) -- fst : local constant, snd = tt → param appears in pattern (uargs : list name) -- levels not in pat (args : list (expr × rel_data)) -- fst : local constant (pat : pattern) -...
structure
transfer.rule_data
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
has_to_tactic_format_rule_data : has_to_tactic_format rule_data
⟨λr, do pr ← pp r.pr, up ← pp r.uparams, mp ← pp r.params, ua ← pp r.uargs, ma ← pp r.args, pat ← pp r.pat.target, output ← pp r.output, return format!"{{ ⟨{pat}⟩ pr: {pr} → {output}, {up} {mp} {ua} {ma} }}" ⟩
instance
transfer.has_to_tactic_format_rule_data
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
get_lift_fun : expr → tactic (list rel_data × expr)
| e := do { guardb (is_constant_of (get_app_fn e) ``relator.lift_fun), [α, β, γ, δ, R, S] ← return $ get_app_args e, (ps, r) ← get_lift_fun S, return (rel_data.mk α β R :: ps, r)} <|> return ([], e)
def
transfer.get_lift_fun
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[ "relator.lift_fun" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mark_occurences (e : expr) : list expr → list (expr × bool)
| [] := [] | (h :: t) := let xs := mark_occurences t in (h, occurs h e || any xs (λ⟨e, oc⟩, oc && occurs h e)) :: xs
def
transfer.mark_occurences
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
analyse_rule (u' : list name) (pr : expr) : tactic rule_data
do t ← infer_type pr, (params, app (app r f) g) ← mk_local_pis t, (arg_rels, R) ← get_lift_fun r, args ← (enum arg_rels).mmap $ λ⟨n, a⟩, prod.mk <$> mk_local_def (mk_simple_name ("a_" ++ repr n)) a.in_type <*> pure a, a_vars ← return $ prod.fst <$> args, p ← head_beta (app_of_list f a_vars), ...
def
transfer.analyse_rule
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
analyse_decls : list name → tactic (list rule_data)
mmap (λn, do d ← get_decl n, c ← return d.univ_params.length, ls ← (repeat () c).mmap (λ_, mk_fresh_name), analyse_rule ls (const n (ls.map level.param)))
def
transfer.analyse_decls
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
split_params_args : list (expr × bool) → list expr → list (expr × option expr) × list expr
| ((lc, tt) :: ps) (e :: es) := let (ps', es') := split_params_args ps es in ((lc, some e) :: ps', es') | ((lc, ff) :: ps) es := let (ps', es') := split_params_args ps es in ((lc, none) :: ps', es') | _ es := ([], es)
def
transfer.split_params_args
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
param_substitutions (ctxt : list expr) : list (expr × option expr) → tactic (list (name × expr) × list expr)
| (((local_const n _ bi t), s) :: ps) := do (e, m) ← match s with | (some e) := return (e, []) | none := let ctxt' := list.filter (λv, occurs v t) ctxt in let ty := pis ctxt' t in if bi = binder_info.inst_implicit then do guard (bi = binder_info.inst_implicit), e ← instantiate_mvars t...
def
transfer.param_substitutions
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
compute_transfer : list rule_data → list expr → expr → tactic (expr × expr × list expr)
| rds ctxt e := do -- Select matching rule (i, ps, args, ms, rd) ← first (rds.map (λrd, do (l, m) ← match_pattern rd.pat e semireducible, level_map ← rd.uparams.mmap $ λl, prod.mk l <$> mk_meta_univ, inst_univ ← return $ λe, instantiate_univ_params e (level_map ++ zip rd.uargs l), (ps, args) ←...
def
transfer.compute_transfer
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.transfer (ds : list name) : tactic unit
do rds ← analyse_decls ds, tgt ← target, (guard (¬ tgt.has_meta_var) <|> fail "Target contains (universe) meta variables. This is not supported by transfer."), (new_tgt, pr, ms) ← compute_transfer rds [] ((const `iff [] : expr) tgt), new_pr ← mk_meta_var new_tgt, /- Setup final tactic state -/ exac...
def
tactic.transfer
tactic
src/tactic/transfer.lean
[ "init.meta.tactic", "init.meta.match_tactic", "init.meta.mk_dec_eq_instance", "init.data.list.instances", "logic.relator" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
copy_attribute' (attr_name : name) (src : name) (tgt : name) (p : option bool := none) : tactic unit
do get_decl tgt <|> fail!"unknown declaration {tgt}", -- if the source doesn't have the attribute we do not error and simply return mwhen (succeeds (has_attribute attr_name src)) $ do (p', prio) ← has_attribute attr_name src, let p := p.get_or_else p', s ← try_or_report_error (set_basic_attribute ...
def
tactic.copy_attribute'
tactic
src/tactic/transform_decl.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "get_user_attribute_name", "succeeds", "try_or_report_error" ]
`copy_attribute' attr_name src tgt p d_name` copy (user) attribute `attr_name` from `src` to `tgt` if it is defined for `src`; unlike `copy_attribute` the primed version also copies the parameter of the user attribute, in the user attribute case. Make it persistent if `p` is `tt`; if `p` is `none`, the copied ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
additive_test_aux (f : name → option name) (ignore : name_map $ list ℕ) : bool → expr → bool
| b (var n) := tt | b (sort l) := tt | b (const n ls) := b || (f n).is_some | b (mvar n m t) := tt | b (local_const n m bi t) := tt | b (app e f) := additive_test_aux tt e && -- this might be inefficient. -- If it becomes a performance problem: we can gi...
def
tactic.additive_test_aux
tactic
src/tactic/transform_decl.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Auxilliary function for `additive_test`. The bool argument *only* matters when applied to exactly a constant.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
additive_test (f : name → option name) (replace_all : bool) (ignore : name_map $ list ℕ) (e : expr) : bool
if replace_all then tt else additive_test_aux f ignore ff e
def
tactic.additive_test
tactic
src/tactic/transform_decl.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`additive_test f replace_all ignore e` tests whether the expression `e` contains no constant `nm` that is not applied to any arguments, and such that `f nm = none`. This is used in `@[to_additive]` for deciding which subexpressions to transform: we only transform constants if `additive_test` applied to their first argu...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
transform_decl_with_prefix_fun_aux (f : name → option name) (replace_all trace : bool) (relevant : name_map ℕ) (ignore reorder : name_map $ list ℕ) (pre tgt_pre : name) : name → command
λ src, do -- if this declaration is not `pre` or an internal declaration, we do nothing. tt ← return (src = pre ∨ src.is_internal : bool) | if (f src).is_some then skip else fail!("@[to_additive] failed. The declaration {pre} depends on the declaration {src} which is in the namespace {pre}, but " ++ "does not h...
def
tactic.transform_decl_with_prefix_fun_aux
tactic
src/tactic/transform_decl.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "name.map_prefix" ]
transform the declaration `src` and all declarations `pre._proof_i` occurring in `src` using the dictionary `f`. `replace_all`, `trace`, `ignore` and `reorder` are configuration options. `pre` is the declaration that got the `@[to_additive]` attribute and `tgt_pre` is the target of this declaration.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
transform_decl_with_prefix_fun (f : name → option name) (replace_all trace : bool) (relevant : name_map ℕ) (ignore reorder : name_map $ list ℕ) (src tgt : name) (attrs : list name) : command
do -- In order to ensure that attributes are copied correctly we must transform declarations and -- attributes in the right order: -- first generate the transformed main declaration transform_decl_with_prefix_fun_aux f replace_all trace relevant ignore reorder src tgt src, ls ← get_eqn_lemmas_for tt src, ...
def
tactic.transform_decl_with_prefix_fun
tactic
src/tactic/transform_decl.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Make a new copy of a declaration, replacing fragments of the names of identifiers in the type and the body using the function `f`. This is used to implement `@[to_additive]`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
transform_decl_with_prefix_dict (dict : name_map name) (replace_all trace : bool) (relevant : name_map ℕ) (ignore reorder : name_map $ list ℕ) (src tgt : name) (attrs : list name) : command
transform_decl_with_prefix_fun dict.find replace_all trace relevant ignore reorder src tgt attrs
def
tactic.transform_decl_with_prefix_dict
tactic
src/tactic/transform_decl.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Make a new copy of a declaration, replacing fragments of the names of identifiers in the type and the body using the dictionary `dict`. This is used to implement `@[to_additive]`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
transport (s e : expr) : tactic unit
do (_, α, β) ← infer_type e >>= relation_lhs_rhs <|> fail format!"second argument to `transport` was not an equivalence-type relation", -- We explode the goal into individual fields using `refine_struct`. -- Later we'll want to also consider falling back to `fconstructor`, -- but for now this suffices. se...
def
tactic.transport
tactic
src/tactic/transport.lean
[ "tactic.equiv_rw" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
transport (s : parse texpr?) (e : parse $ (tk "using" *> texpr)) : itactic
do s ← match s with | some s := to_expr s | none := (do t ← target, let n := t.get_app_fn.const_name, ctx ← local_context, ctx.any_of (λ e, (do t ← infer_type e, guard (t.get_app_fn.const_name = n), return e))) <|> fail "`transport` could not find an appropriate source object. Try ...
def
tactic.interactive.transport
tactic
src/tactic/transport.lean
[ "tactic.equiv_rw" ]
[ "tactic.transport" ]
Given a goal `⊢ S β` for some type class `S`, and an equivalence `e : α ≃ β`. `transport using e` will look for a hypothesis `s : S α`, and attempt to close the goal by transporting `s` across the equivalence `e`. ```lean example {α : Type} [ring α] {β : Type} (e : α ≃ β) : ring β := by transport using e. ``` You can...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
trunc_cases_subsingleton (e : expr) (ids : list name) : tactic expr
do -- When the target is a subsingleton, -- we can just use induction along `trunc.rec_on_subsingleton`, -- generating just a single goal. [(_, [e], _)] ← tactic.induction e ids `trunc.rec_on_subsingleton, return e
def
tactic.trunc_cases_subsingleton
tactic
src/tactic/trunc_cases.lean
[ "tactic.chain", "data.quot" ]
[ "trunc.rec_on_subsingleton" ]
Auxiliary tactic for `trunc_cases`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
trunc_cases_nondependent (e : expr) (ids : list name) : tactic expr
do -- We may as well just use `trunc.lift_on`. -- (It would be nice if we could use the `induction` tactic with non-dependent recursors, too?) -- (In fact, the general strategy works just as well here, -- except that it leaves a beta redex in the invariance goal.) to_expr ``(trunc.lift_on %%e) >>= tactic.fapp...
def
tactic.trunc_cases_nondependent
tactic
src/tactic/trunc_cases.lean
[ "tactic.chain", "data.quot" ]
[]
Auxiliary tactic for `trunc_cases`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
trunc_cases_dependent (e : expr) (ids : list name) : tactic expr
do -- If all else fails, just use the general induction principle. [(_, [e], _), (_, [e_a, e_b, e_p], _)] ← tactic.induction e ids, -- However even now we can do something useful: -- the invariance goal has a useless `e_p : true` hypothesis, -- and after casing on that we may be able to simplify away -- the...
def
tactic.trunc_cases_dependent
tactic
src/tactic/trunc_cases.lean
[ "tactic.chain", "data.quot" ]
[ "eq_rec_constant" ]
Auxiliary tactic for `trunc_cases`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
trunc_cases (e : parse texpr) (ids : parse with_ident_list) : tactic unit
do e ← to_expr e, -- If `ids = []` and `e` is a local constant, we'll want to give -- the new unboxed hypothesis the same name. let ids := if ids = [] ∧ e.is_local_constant then [e.local_pp_name] else ids, -- Make a note of the expr `e`, or reuse `e` if it is already a local constant. e ← if e.is_local_cons...
def
tactic.interactive.trunc_cases
tactic
src/tactic/trunc_cases.lean
[ "tactic.chain", "data.quot" ]
[ "succeeds" ]
`trunc_cases e` performs case analysis on a `trunc` expression `e`, attempting the following strategies: 1. when the goal is a subsingleton, calling `induction e using trunc.rec_on_subsingleton`, 2. when the goal does not depend on `e`, calling `fapply trunc.lift_on e`, and using `intro` and `clear` afterwards to ma...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
find_splitting_expr : expr → tactic expr
| `(@ite _ %%cond %%dec_inst _ _ = _) := pure `(@decidable.em %%cond %%dec_inst) | `(%%(app x y) = _) := pure y | e := fail!"expected an expression of the form: f x = y. Got:\n{e}"
def
tactic.unfold_cases.find_splitting_expr
tactic
src/tactic/unfold_cases.lean
[ "tactic.split_ifs" ]
[]
Given an equation `f x = y`, this tactic tries to infer an expression that can be used to do distinction by cases on to make progress. Pre-condition: assumes that the outer-most application cannot be beta-reduced (e.g. `whnf` or `dsimp`).
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unfold_cases_core (inner : interactive.itactic) : tactic unit
inner <|> (do split_ifs [], all_goals unfold_cases_core, skip) <|> do tgt ← target, e ← find_splitting_expr tgt, focus1 $ do cases e, all_goals $ (dsimp_target >> unfold_cases_core) <|> skip, skip
def
tactic.unfold_cases.unfold_cases_core
tactic
src/tactic/unfold_cases.lean
[ "tactic.split_ifs" ]
[]
Tries to finish the current goal using the `inner` tactic. If the tactic fails, it tries to find an expression on which to do a distinction by cases and calls itself recursively. The order of operations is significant. Because the unfolding can potentially be infinite, it is important to apply the `inner` tact...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unfold_tgt : expr → tactic unit
| `(%%l@(app _ _) = %%r) := match l.get_app_fn with | const n ls := delta_target [n] | e := fail!"couldn't unfold:\n{e}" end | e := fail!"expected an expression of the form: f x = y. Got:\n{e}"
def
tactic.unfold_cases.unfold_tgt
tactic
src/tactic/unfold_cases.lean
[ "tactic.split_ifs" ]
[]
Given a target of the form `⊢ f x₁ ... xₙ = y`, unfolds `f` using a delta reduction.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unfold_cases (inner : itactic) : tactic unit
focus1 $ do tactic.intros, tgt ← target, unfold_tgt tgt, try dsimp_target, unfold_cases_core inner
def
tactic.interactive.unfold_cases
tactic
src/tactic/unfold_cases.lean
[ "tactic.split_ifs" ]
[]
This tactic unfolds the definition of a function or `match` expression. Then it recursively introduces a distinction by cases. The decision what expression to do the distinction on is driven by the pattern matching expression. A typical use case is using `unfold_cases { refl }` to collapse cases that need to be ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unification_step_result : Type | simplified (next_equations : list name) | not_simplified | goal_solved
inductive
tactic.unify_equations.unification_step_result
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
The result of a unification step: - `simplified hs` means that the step succeeded and produced some new (simpler) equations `hs`. `hs` can be empty. - `goal_solved` means that the step succeeded and solved the goal (by deriving a contradiction from the given equation). - `not_simplified` means that the step failed...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unification_step : Type
∀ (equ lhs_type rhs_type lhs rhs lhs_whnf rhs_whnf : expr) (u : level), tactic unification_step_result
def
tactic.unify_equations.unification_step
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
A unification step is a tactic that attempts to simplify a given equation and returns a `unification_step_result`. The inputs are: - `equ`, the equation being processed. Must be a local constant. - `lhs_type` and `rhs_type`, the types of equ's LHS and RHS. For homogeneous equations, these are defeq. - `lhs` and `rhs...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unify_heterogeneous : unification_step
λ equ lhs_type rhs_type lhs rhs _ _ _, do { is_def_eq lhs_type rhs_type, p ← to_expr ``(@eq_of_heq %%lhs_type %%lhs %%rhs %%equ), t ← to_expr ``(@eq %%lhs_type %%lhs %%rhs), equ' ← note equ.local_pp_name t p, clear equ, pure $ simplified [equ'.local_pp_name] } <|> pure not_simplified
def
tactic.unify_equations.unify_heterogeneous
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
For `equ : t == u` with `t : T` and `u : U`, if `T` and `U` are defeq, we replace `equ` with `equ : t = u`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unify_defeq : unification_step
λ equ lhs_type _ _ _ lhs_whnf rhs_whnf _, do { is_def_eq lhs_whnf rhs_whnf, clear equ, pure $ simplified [] } <|> pure not_simplified
def
tactic.unify_equations.unify_defeq
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
For `equ : t = u`, if `t` and `u` are defeq, we delete `equ`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unify_var : unification_step
λ equ type _ lhs rhs lhs_whnf rhs_whnf u, do { let lhs_is_local := lhs_whnf.is_local_constant, let rhs_is_local := rhs_whnf.is_local_constant, guard $ lhs_is_local ∨ rhs_is_local, let t := if lhs_is_local then (const `eq [u]) type lhs_whnf rhs else (const `eq [u]) type lhs rhs_whnf, change_core ...
def
tactic.unify_equations.unify_var
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
For `equ : x = t` or `equ : t = x`, where `x` is a local constant, we substitute `x` with `t` in the goal.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
injection_with' (h : expr) (ns : list name) (base := `h) (offset := some 1) : tactic (option (list expr) × list name)
do H ← infer_type h, (lhs, rhs, constructor_left, constructor_right, inj_name) ← do { (lhs, rhs) ← match_eq H, constructor_left ← get_app_fn_const_whnf lhs semireducible ff, constructor_right ← get_app_fn_const_whnf rhs semireducible ff, inj_name ← resolve_constant $ constructor_left ++ "inj_arrow", ...
def
tactic.unify_equations.injection_with'
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "list.replicate" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unify_constructor_headed : unification_step
λ equ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, do { (next, _) ← injection_with' equ [] `_ none, try $ clear equ, pure $ match next with | none := goal_solved | some next := simplified $ next.map expr.local_pp_name end } <|> pure not_simplified
def
tactic.unify_equations.unify_constructor_headed
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Given `equ : C x₁ ... xₙ = D y₁ ... yₘ` with `C` and `D` constructors of the same datatype `I`: - If `C ≠ D`, we solve the goal by contradiction using the no-confusion rule. - If `C = D`, we clear `equ` and add equations `x₁ = y₁`, ..., `xₙ = yₙ`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
get_sizeof (type : expr) : tactic pexpr
do n ← get_app_fn_const_whnf type semireducible ff, resolve_name $ n ++ `sizeof
def
tactic.unify_equations.get_sizeof
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
For `type = I x₁ ... xₙ`, where `I` is an inductive type, `get_sizeof type` returns the constant `I.sizeof`. Fails if `type` is not of this form or if no such constant exists.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
add_add_one_ne (n m : ℕ) : n + (m + 1) ≠ n
begin apply ne_of_gt, apply nat.lt_add_of_pos_right, apply nat.pos_of_ne_zero, contradiction end
lemma
tactic.unify_equations.add_add_one_ne
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
match_n_plus_m (md) : ℕ → expr → tactic (ℕ × expr)
λ n e, do e ← whnf e md, match e with | `(nat.succ %%e) := match_n_plus_m (n + 1) e | _ := pure (n, e) end
def
tactic.unify_equations.match_n_plus_m
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`match_n_plus_m n e` matches `e` of the form `nat.succ (... (nat.succ e')...)`. It returns `n` plus the number of `succ` constructors and `e'`. The matching is performed up to normalisation with transparency `md`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
contradict_n_eq_n_plus_m (md : transparency) (equ lhs rhs : expr) : tactic expr
do ⟨lhs_n, lhs_e⟩ ← match_n_plus_m md 0 lhs, ⟨rhs_n, rhs_e⟩ ← match_n_plus_m md 0 rhs, is_def_eq lhs_e rhs_e md <|> fail ("contradict_n_eq_n_plus_m:\nexpected {lhs_e} and {rhs_e} to be definitionally " ++ "equal at transparency {md}."), let common := lhs_e, guard (lhs_n ≠ rhs_n) <|> fail "contradi...
def
tactic.unify_equations.contradict_n_eq_n_plus_m
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Given `equ : n + m = n` or `equ : n = n + m` with `n` and `m` natural numbers and `m` a nonzero literal, this tactic produces a proof of `false`. More precisely, the two sides of the equation must be of the form `nat.succ (... (nat.succ e)...)` with different numbers of `nat.succ` constructors. Matching is performed wi...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unify_cyclic : unification_step
λ equ type _ _ _ lhs_whnf rhs_whnf _, do { -- Establish `sizeof lhs = sizeof rhs`. sizeof ← get_sizeof type, hyp_lhs ← to_expr ``(%%sizeof %%lhs_whnf), hyp_rhs ← to_expr ``(%%sizeof %%rhs_whnf), hyp_type ← to_expr ``(@eq ℕ %%hyp_lhs %%hyp_rhs), hyp_proof ← to_expr ``(@congr_arg %%type ℕ %%lhs_whnf %%rhs_whnf ...
def
tactic.unify_equations.unify_cyclic
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Given `equ : t = u` with `t, u : I` and `I.sizeof t ≠ I.sizeof u`, we solve the goal by contradiction.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
orelse_step (s t : unification_step) : unification_step
λ equ lhs_type rhs_type lhs rhs lhs_whnf rhs_whnf u, do r ← s equ lhs_type rhs_type lhs rhs lhs_whnf rhs_whnf u, match r with | simplified _ := pure r | goal_solved := pure r | not_simplified := t equ lhs_type rhs_type lhs rhs lhs_whnf rhs_whnf u end
def
tactic.unify_equations.orelse_step
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`orelse_step s t` first runs the unification step `s`. If this was successful (i.e. `s` simplified or solved the goal), it returns the result of `s`. Otherwise, it runs `t` and returns its result.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unify_homogeneous : unification_step
list.foldl orelse_step (λ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, pure not_simplified) [unify_defeq, unify_var, unify_constructor_headed, unify_cyclic]
def
tactic.unify_equations.unify_homogeneous
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
For `equ : t = u`, try the following methods in order: `unify_defeq`, `unify_var`, `unify_constructor_headed`, `unify_cyclic`. If any of them is successful, stop and return its result. If none is successful, fail.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unify_equation_once (equ : name) : tactic unification_step_result
do eque ← get_local equ, t ← infer_type eque, match t with | (app (app (app (const `eq [u]) type) lhs) rhs) := do lhs_whnf ← whnf_ginductive lhs, rhs_whnf ← whnf_ginductive rhs, unify_homogeneous eque type type lhs rhs lhs_whnf rhs_whnf u | (app (app (app (app (const `heq [u]) lhs_type) lhs) rhs_t...
def
tactic.unify_equation_once
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
If `equ` is the display name of a local constant with type `t = u` or `t == u`, then `unify_equation_once equ` simplifies it once using `unify_equations.unify_homogeneous` or `unify_equations.unify_heterogeneous`. Otherwise it fails.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unify_equations : list name → tactic bool
| [] := pure ff | (h :: hs) := do res ← unify_equation_once h, match res with | simplified hs' := unify_equations $ hs' ++ hs | not_simplified := unify_equations hs | goal_solved := pure tt end
def
tactic.unify_equations
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Given a list of display names of local hypotheses that are (homogeneous or heterogeneous) equations, `unify_equations` performs first-order unification on each hypothesis in order. See `tactic.interactive.unify_equations` for an example and an explanation of what unification does. Returns true iff the goal has been so...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
unify_equations (eqs : interactive.parse (many ident)) : tactic unit
tactic.unify_equations eqs *> skip
def
tactic.interactive.unify_equations
tactic
src/tactic/unify_equations.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "tactic.unify_equations" ]
`unify_equations eq₁ ... eqₙ` performs a form of first-order unification on the hypotheses `eqᵢ`. The `eqᵢ` must be homogeneous or heterogeneous equations. Unification means that the equations are simplified using various facts about constructors. For instance, consider this goal: ``` P : ∀ n, fin n → Prop n m : ℕ f :...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
binder_priority : binder_info → ℕ
| binder_info.implicit := 1 | binder_info.strict_implicit := 2 | binder_info.default := 3 | binder_info.inst_implicit := 4 | binder_info.aux_decl := 5
def
where.binder_priority
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Assigns a priority to each binder for determining the order in which variables are traced.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
binder_less_important (u v : binder_info) : bool
(binder_priority u) < (binder_priority v)
def
where.binder_less_important
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
The relation on binder priorities.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
select_for_which {α β γ : Type} (p : α → β × γ) [decidable_eq β] (b' : β) : list α → list γ × list α
| [] := ([], []) | (a :: rest) := let (cs, others) := select_for_which rest, (b, c) := p a in if b = b' then (c :: cs, others) else (cs, a :: others)
def
where.select_for_which
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Selects the elements of the given `list α` which under the image of `p : α → β × γ` have `β` component equal to `b'`. Returns the `γ` components of the selected elements under the image of `p`, and the elements of the original `list α` which were not selected.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
collect_by_aux {α β γ : Type} (p : α → β × γ) [decidable_eq β] : list β → list α → list (β × list γ)
| [] [] := [] | [] _ := undefined_core "didn't find every key entry!" | (b :: rest) as := let (cs, as) := select_for_which p b as in (b, cs) :: collect_by_aux rest as
def
where.collect_by_aux
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Helper function for `collect_by`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
collect_by {α β γ : Type} (l : list α) (p : α → β × γ) [decidable_eq β] : list (β × list γ)
collect_by_aux p (l.map $ prod.fst ∘ p).dedup l
def
where.collect_by
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Returns the elements of `l` under the image of `p`, collecting together elements with the same `β` component, deleting duplicates.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sort_variable_list (l : list (name × binder_info × expr)) : list (expr × binder_info × list name)
let l := collect_by l $ λ v, (v.2.2, (v.1, v.2.1)) in let l := l.map $ λ el, (el.1, collect_by el.2 $ λ v, (v.2, v.1)) in (list.join $ l.map $ λ e, prod.mk e.1 <$> e.2).qsort (λ v u, binder_less_important v.2.1 u.2.1)
def
where.sort_variable_list
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Sort the variables by their priority as defined by `where.binder_priority`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
collect_implicit_names : list name → list string × list string
| [] := ([], []) | (n :: ns) := let n := to_string n, (ns, ins) := collect_implicit_names ns in if n.front = '_' then (ns, n :: ins) else (n :: ns, ins)
def
where.collect_implicit_names
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Separate out the names of implicit variables (commonly instances with no name).
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
format_variable : expr × binder_info × list name → tactic string
| (e, bi, ns) := do let (l, r) := bi.brackets, e ← pp e, let (ns, ins) := collect_implicit_names ns, let ns := " ".intercalate $ ns.map to_string, let ns := if ns.length = 0 then [] else [sformat!"{l}{ns} : {e}{r}"], let ins := ins.map $ λ _, sformat!"{l}{e}{r}", return $ " ".intercalate $ ns ++ ins
def
where.format_variable
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Format an individual variable definition for printing.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
compile_variable_list (l : list (name × binder_info × expr)) : tactic string
" ".intercalate <$> (sort_variable_list l).mmap format_variable
def
where.compile_variable_list
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Turn a list of triples of variable names, binder info, and types, into a pretty list.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
strip_namespace (ns n : name) : name
n.replace_prefix ns name.anonymous
def
where.strip_namespace
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Strips the namespace prefix `ns` from `n`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
get_open_namespaces (ns : name) : tactic (list name)
do opens ← list.dedup <$> tactic.open_namespaces, return $ (opens.erase ns).map $ strip_namespace ns
def
where.get_open_namespaces
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "list.dedup" ]
`get_open_namespaces ns` returns a list of the open namespaces, given that we are currently in the namespace `ns` (which we do not include).
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
explain_anonymous_name : name → string
| name.anonymous := "[root namespace]" | ns := to_string ns
def
where.explain_anonymous_name
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Give a slightly friendlier name for `name.anonymous` in the context of your current namespace.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
build_str_namespace (ns : name) : lean.parser string
return sformat!"namespace {explain_anonymous_name ns}"
def
where.build_str_namespace
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`#where` output helper which traces the current namespace.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
build_str_open_namespaces (ns : name) : tactic string
do l ← get_open_namespaces ns, let str := " ".intercalate $ l.map to_string, if l.empty then return "" else return sformat!"open {str}"
def
where.build_str_open_namespaces
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`#where` output helper which traces the open namespaces.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
build_str_variables : lean.parser string
do l ← get_variables, str ← compile_variable_list l, if l.empty then return "" else return sformat!"variables {str}"
def
where.build_str_variables
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`#where` output helper which traces the variables.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
build_str_includes : lean.parser string
do l ← get_included_variables, let str := " ".intercalate $ l.map $ λ n, to_string n.1, if l.empty then return "" else return sformat!"include {str}"
def
where.build_str_includes
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`#where` output helper which traces the includes.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
build_str_end (ns : name) : tactic string
return sformat!"end {explain_anonymous_name ns}"
def
where.build_str_end
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`#where` output helper which traces the namespace end.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
append_nl (s : string) (n : ℕ) : tactic string
return $ s ++ (list.as_string $ (list.range n).map $ λ _, '\n')
def
where.append_nl
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`#where` output helper which traces newlines.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
append_line (s : string) (t : lean.parser string) : lean.parser string
do v ← t, return $ s ++ v ++ (if v.length = 0 then "" else "\n")
def
where.append_line
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`#where` output helper which traces lines, adding a newline if nonempty.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
build_msg : lean.parser string
do let msg := "", ns ← get_current_namespace, msg ← append_line msg $ build_str_namespace ns, msg ← append_nl msg 1, msg ← append_line msg $ build_str_open_namespaces ns, msg ← append_line msg $ build_str_variables, msg ← append_line msg $ build_str_includes, msg ← append_nl msg 3, msg ← app...
def
where.build_msg
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
`#where` output main function.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
where_cmd (_ : parse $ tk "#where") : lean.parser unit
do msg ← build_msg, trace msg
def
where.where_cmd
tactic
src/tactic/where.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
When working in a Lean file with namespaces, parameters, and variables, it can be confusing to identify what the current "parser context" is. The command `#where` identifies and prints information about the current location, including the active namespace, open namespaces, and declared variables. It is a bug for `#whe...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
decl_reducibility | reducible | semireducible | irreducible
inductive
tactic.decl_reducibility
tactic
src/tactic/with_local_reducibility.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "irreducible" ]
Possible reducibility attributes for a declaration: reducible, semireducible (the default), irreducible.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
get_decl_reducibility (n : name) : tactic decl_reducibility
do is_irred ← has_attribute' `irreducible n, if is_irred then pure decl_reducibility.irreducible else do is_red ← has_attribute' `reducible n, if is_red then pure decl_reducibility.reducible else do e ← get_env, if e.contains n then pure decl_reducibility.semireducible else fail format!"get_decl_reducibilit...
def
tactic.get_decl_reducibility
tactic
src/tactic/with_local_reducibility.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "irreducible" ]
Get the reducibility attribute of a declaration. Fails if the name does not refer to an existing declaration.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
decl_reducibility.to_attribute : decl_reducibility → name
| decl_reducibility.reducible := `reducible | decl_reducibility.semireducible := `semireducible | decl_reducibility.irreducible := `irreducible
def
tactic.decl_reducibility.to_attribute
tactic
src/tactic/with_local_reducibility.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[ "irreducible" ]
Return the attribute (as a `name`) corresponding to a reducibility level.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
set_decl_reducibility (n : name) (r : decl_reducibility) (persistent := ff) : tactic unit
set_basic_attribute r.to_attribute n persistent
def
tactic.set_decl_reducibility
tactic
src/tactic/with_local_reducibility.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Set the reducibility attribute of a declaration. If `persistent := ff`, this is scoped to the enclosing `section`, like `local attribute`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
with_local_reducibility {α : Type*} (n : name) (r : decl_reducibility) (body : tactic α) : tactic α
do r' ← get_decl_reducibility n, bracket (set_decl_reducibility n r) body (set_decl_reducibility n r')
def
tactic.with_local_reducibility
tactic
src/tactic/with_local_reducibility.lean
[ "tactic.core" ]
[]
Execute a tactic with a temporarily modified reducibility attribute for a declaration.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
take_pi_args : nat → expr → list name
| (n+1) (expr.pi h _ _ e) := h :: take_pi_args n e | _ _ := []
def
tactic.take_pi_args
tactic
src/tactic/wlog.lean
[ "tactic.core", "tactic.dependencies" ]
[]
A helper function to retrieve the names of the first `n` arguments to a Pi-expression.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
wlog (H : parse ident) (t : parse (tk ":" *> texpr)) (revert : parse ((tk "generalizing" *> ((none <$ tk "*") <|> some <$> ident*)) <|> pure none)) (h : parse (tk "with" *> ident)?) : tactic unit
do -- if there is no `with` clause, use `this` as default name let h := h.get_or_else `this, t ← i_to_expr ``(%%t : Sort*), -- compute which constants must be reverted (by default: everything) (num_generalized, goal, rctx) ← retrieve (do assert_core H t, swap, -- use `revert_lst'` to ensure that the o...
def
tactic.interactive.wlog
tactic
src/tactic/wlog.lean
[ "tactic.core", "tactic.dependencies" ]
[]
`wlog h : P` will add an assumption `h : P` to the main goal, and add a side goal that requires showing that the case `h : ¬ P` can be reduced to the case where `P` holds (typically by symmetry). The side goal will be at the top of the stack. In this side goal, there will be two assumptions: - `h : ¬ P`: the assumptio...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
zify_attr : user_attribute simp_lemmas unit
{ name := `zify, descr := "Used to tag lemmas for use in the `zify` tactic", cache_cfg := { mk_cache := λ ns, mmap (λ n, do c ← mk_const n, return (c, tt)) ns >>= simp_lemmas.mk.append_with_symm, dependencies := [] } }
def
zify.zify_attr
tactic
src/tactic/zify.lean
[ "data.int.cast.lemmas", "data.int.char_zero", "tactic.norm_cast" ]
[]
The `zify` attribute is used by the `zify` tactic. It applies to lemmas that shift propositions between `nat` and `int`. `zify` lemmas should have the form `∀ a₁ ... aₙ : ℕ, Pz (a₁ : ℤ) ... (aₙ : ℤ) ↔ Pn a₁ ... aₙ`. For example, `int.coe_nat_le_coe_nat_iff : ∀ (m n : ℕ), ↑m ≤ ↑n ↔ m ≤ n` is a `zify` lemma.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
lift_to_z (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr)
do sl ← zify_attr.get_cache, sl ← sl.add_simp `ge_iff_le, sl ← sl.add_simp `gt_iff_lt, (e', prf, _) ← simplify sl [] e, return (e', prf)
def
zify.lift_to_z
tactic
src/tactic/zify.lean
[ "data.int.cast.lemmas", "data.int.char_zero", "tactic.norm_cast" ]
[ "ge_iff_le", "gt_iff_lt" ]
Given an expression `e`, `lift_to_z e` looks for subterms of `e` that are propositions "about" natural numbers and change them to propositions about integers. Returns an expression `e'` and a proof that `e = e'`. Includes `ge_iff_le` and `gt_iff_lt` in the simp set. These can't be tagged with `zify` as we want to use...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
int.coe_nat_ne_coe_nat_iff (a b : ℕ) : (a : ℤ) ≠ b ↔ a ≠ b
by simp
lemma
int.coe_nat_ne_coe_nat_iff
tactic
src/tactic/zify.lean
[ "data.int.cast.lemmas", "data.int.char_zero", "tactic.norm_cast" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.zify (extra_lems : list simp_arg_type) : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
λ z, do (z1, p1) ← zify.lift_to_z z <|> fail "failed to find an applicable zify lemma", (z2, p2) ← norm_cast.derive_push_cast extra_lems z1, prod.mk z2 <$> mk_eq_trans p1 p2
def
tactic.zify
tactic
src/tactic/zify.lean
[ "data.int.cast.lemmas", "data.int.char_zero", "tactic.norm_cast" ]
[ "norm_cast.derive_push_cast", "zify.lift_to_z" ]
`zify extra_lems e` is used to shift propositions in `e` from `ℕ` to `ℤ`. This is often useful since `ℤ` has well-behaved subtraction. The list of extra lemmas is used in the `push_cast` step. Returns an expression `e'` and a proof that `e = e'`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.zify_proof (extra_lems : list simp_arg_type) (h : expr) : tactic expr
do (_, pf) ← infer_type h >>= tactic.zify extra_lems, mk_eq_mp pf h
def
tactic.zify_proof
tactic
src/tactic/zify.lean
[ "data.int.cast.lemmas", "data.int.char_zero", "tactic.norm_cast" ]
[ "tactic.zify" ]
A variant of `tactic.zify` that takes `h`, a proof of a proposition about natural numbers, and returns a proof of the zified version of that propositon.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tactic.interactive.zify (sl : parse simp_arg_list) (l : parse location) : tactic unit
do locs ← l.get_locals, replace_at (tactic.zify sl) locs l.include_goal >>= guardb
def
tactic.interactive.zify
tactic
src/tactic/zify.lean
[ "data.int.cast.lemmas", "data.int.char_zero", "tactic.norm_cast" ]
[ "tactic.zify" ]
The `zify` tactic is used to shift propositions from `ℕ` to `ℤ`. This is often useful since `ℤ` has well-behaved subtraction. ```lean example (a b c x y z : ℕ) (h : ¬ x*y*z < 0) : c < a + 3*b := begin zify, zify at h, /- h : ¬↑x * ↑y * ↑z < 0 ⊢ ↑c < ↑a + 3 * ↑b -/ end ``` `zify` can be given extra lemmas ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
apply_congr (q : parse texpr?) : conv unit
do congr_lemmas ← match q with -- If the user specified a lemma, use that one, | some e := do gs ← get_goals, e ← to_expr e, -- to_expr messes with the goals? (see tests) set_goals gs, return [e] -- otherwise, look up everything tagged `@[congr]` | none := do congr_lemma_names ← attribute....
def
conv.interactive.apply_congr
tactic.converter
src/tactic/converter/apply_congr.lean
[ "tactic.interactive", "tactic.converter.interactive" ]
[]
Apply a congruence lemma inside `conv` mode. When called without an argument `apply_congr` will try applying all lemmas marked with `@[congr]`. Otherwise `apply_congr e` will apply the lemma `e`. Recall that a goal that appears as `∣ X` in `conv` mode represents a goal of `⊢ X = ?m`, i.e. an equation with a metavaria...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
current_relation : old_conv name
λr lhs, return ⟨r, lhs, none⟩
def
old_conv.current_relation
tactic.converter
src/tactic/converter/binders.lean
[ "order.complete_lattice" ]
[ "old_conv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
head_beta : old_conv unit
λ r e, do n ← tactic.head_beta e, return ⟨(), n, none⟩
def
old_conv.head_beta
tactic.converter
src/tactic/converter/binders.lean
[ "order.complete_lattice" ]
[ "old_conv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
congr_arg : old_conv unit → old_conv unit
congr_core (return ())
def
old_conv.congr_arg
tactic.converter
src/tactic/converter/binders.lean
[ "order.complete_lattice" ]
[ "old_conv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
congr_fun : old_conv unit → old_conv unit
λc, congr_core c (return ())
def
old_conv.congr_fun
tactic.converter
src/tactic/converter/binders.lean
[ "order.complete_lattice" ]
[ "old_conv" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83