statement
stringlengths
1
2.88k
proof
stringlengths
0
13.9k
type
stringclasses
10 values
symbolic_name
stringlengths
1
131
library
stringclasses
417 values
filename
stringlengths
17
80
imports
listlengths
0
16
deps
listlengths
0
64
docstring
stringlengths
0
10.2k
source_url
stringclasses
1 value
commit
stringclasses
1 value
le_comp_radius_of_summable (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (r : ℝ≥0) (hr : summable (λ i : (Σ n, composition n), ‖q.comp_along_composition p i.2‖₊ * r ^ i.1)) : (r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (q.comp p).radius
begin refine le_radius_of_bound_nnreal _ (∑' i : (Σ n, composition n), ‖comp_along_composition q p i.snd‖₊ * r ^ i.fst) (λ n, _), calc ‖formal_multilinear_series.comp q p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ ∑' (c : composition n), ‖comp_along_composition q p c‖₊ * r ^ n : begin rw [tsum_fintype, ← finset.sum_mul], ...
theorem
formal_multilinear_series.le_comp_radius_of_summable
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "finset.sum_mul", "formal_multilinear_series", "le_rfl", "mul_le_mul'", "nnreal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj", "sigma_mk_injective", "summable", "tsum_fintype" ]
Bounding below the radius of the composition of two formal multilinear series assuming summability over all compositions.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_partial_sum_source (m M N : ℕ) : finset (Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ)
finset.sigma (finset.Ico m M) (λ (n : ℕ), fintype.pi_finset (λ (i : fin n), finset.Ico 1 N) : _)
def
formal_multilinear_series.comp_partial_sum_source
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "finset", "finset.Ico", "finset.sigma", "fintype.pi_finset" ]
Source set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal power series. See also `comp_partial_sum`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff (m M N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ) : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N ↔ (m ≤ i.1 ∧ i.1 < M) ∧ ∀ (a : fin i.1), 1 ≤ i.2 a ∧ i.2 a < N
by simp only [comp_partial_sum_source, finset.mem_Ico, fintype.mem_pi_finset, finset.mem_sigma, iff_self]
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "finset.mem_Ico", "finset.mem_sigma", "fintype.mem_pi_finset" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_change_of_variables (m M N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ) (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N) : (Σ n, composition n)
begin rcases i with ⟨n, f⟩, rw mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff at hi, refine ⟨∑ j, f j, of_fn (λ a, f a), λ i hi', _, by simp [sum_of_fn]⟩, obtain ⟨j, rfl⟩ : ∃ (j : fin n), f j = i, by rwa [mem_of_fn, set.mem_range] at hi', exact (hi.2 j).1 end
def
formal_multilinear_series.comp_change_of_variables
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "set.mem_range" ]
Change of variables appearing to compute the composition of partial sums of formal power series
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_change_of_variables_length (m M N : ℕ) {i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ} (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N) : composition.length (comp_change_of_variables m M N i hi).2 = i.1
begin rcases i with ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩, dsimp [comp_change_of_variables], simp only [composition.length, map_of_fn, length_of_fn] end
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.comp_change_of_variables_length
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition.length" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_change_of_variables_blocks_fun (m M N : ℕ) {i : Σ n, (fin n) → ℕ} (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N) (j : fin i.1) : (comp_change_of_variables m M N i hi).2.blocks_fun ⟨j, (comp_change_of_variables_length m M N hi).symm ▸ j.2⟩ = i.2 j
begin rcases i with ⟨n, f⟩, dsimp [composition.blocks_fun, composition.blocks, comp_change_of_variables], simp only [map_of_fn, nth_le_of_fn', function.comp_app], apply congr_arg, exact fin.eta _ _ end
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.comp_change_of_variables_blocks_fun
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition.blocks_fun", "fin.eta" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_partial_sum_target_set (m M N : ℕ) : set (Σ n, composition n)
{i | (m ≤ i.2.length) ∧ (i.2.length < M) ∧ (∀ (j : fin i.2.length), i.2.blocks_fun j < N)}
def
formal_multilinear_series.comp_partial_sum_target_set
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition" ]
Target set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal power series, here given a a set.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_partial_sum_target_subset_image_comp_partial_sum_source (m M N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, composition n) (hi : i ∈ comp_partial_sum_target_set m M N) : ∃ j (hj : j ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N), i = comp_change_of_variables m M N j hj
begin rcases i with ⟨n, c⟩, refine ⟨⟨c.length, c.blocks_fun⟩, _, _⟩, { simp only [comp_partial_sum_target_set, set.mem_set_of_eq] at hi, simp only [mem_comp_partial_sum_source_iff, hi.left, hi.right, true_and, and_true], exact λ a, c.one_le_blocks' _ }, { dsimp [comp_change_of_variables], rw composi...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.comp_partial_sum_target_subset_image_comp_partial_sum_source
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "composition.blocks_fun", "composition.sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq", "subtype.coe_eta" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_partial_sum_target (m M N : ℕ) : finset (Σ n, composition n)
set.finite.to_finset $ ((finset.finite_to_set _).dependent_image _).subset $ comp_partial_sum_target_subset_image_comp_partial_sum_source m M N
def
formal_multilinear_series.comp_partial_sum_target
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "finset", "finset.finite_to_set", "set.finite.to_finset" ]
Target set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal power series, here given a a finset. See also `comp_partial_sum`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mem_comp_partial_sum_target_iff {m M N : ℕ} {a : Σ n, composition n} : a ∈ comp_partial_sum_target m M N ↔ m ≤ a.2.length ∧ a.2.length < M ∧ (∀ (j : fin a.2.length), a.2.blocks_fun j < N)
by simp [comp_partial_sum_target, comp_partial_sum_target_set]
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.mem_comp_partial_sum_target_iff
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_change_of_variables_sum {α : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α] (m M N : ℕ) (f : (Σ (n : ℕ), fin n → ℕ) → α) (g : (Σ n, composition n) → α) (h : ∀ e (he : e ∈ comp_partial_sum_source m M N), f e = g (comp_change_of_variables m M N e he)) : ∑ e in comp_partial_sum_source m M N, f e = ∑ e in comp_partial_sum_targe...
begin apply finset.sum_bij (comp_change_of_variables m M N), -- We should show that the correspondance we have set up is indeed a bijection -- between the index sets of the two sums. -- 1 - show that the image belongs to `comp_partial_sum_target m N N` { rintros ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H, rw mem_comp_partial_sum_...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.comp_change_of_variables_sum
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "add_comm_monoid", "composition", "composition.blocks_fun", "composition.blocks_fun_congr", "composition.length" ]
`comp_change_of_variables m M N` is a bijection between `comp_partial_sum_source m M N` and `comp_partial_sum_target m M N`, yielding equal sums for functions that correspond to each other under the bijection. As `comp_change_of_variables m M N` is a dependent function, stating that it is a bijection is not directly po...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_partial_sum_target_tendsto_at_top : tendsto (λ N, comp_partial_sum_target 0 N N) at_top at_top
begin apply monotone.tendsto_at_top_finset, { assume m n hmn a ha, have : ∀ i, i < m → i < n := λ i hi, lt_of_lt_of_le hi hmn, tidy }, { rintros ⟨n, c⟩, simp only [mem_comp_partial_sum_target_iff], obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : bdd_above ↑(finset.univ.image (λ (i : fin c.length), c.blocks_fun i)) := fins...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.comp_partial_sum_target_tendsto_at_top
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "bdd_above", "bot_le", "finset.bdd_above", "finset.mem_coe", "finset.mem_image_of_mem", "finset.mem_univ", "lt_add_one" ]
The auxiliary set corresponding to the composition of partial sums asymptotically contains all possible compositions.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_partial_sum (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (N : ℕ) (z : E) : q.partial_sum N (∑ i in finset.Ico 1 N, p i (λ j, z)) = ∑ i in comp_partial_sum_target 0 N N, q.comp_along_composition p i.2 (λ j, z)
begin -- we expand the composition, using the multilinearity of `q` to expand along each coordinate. suffices H : ∑ n in finset.range N, ∑ r in fintype.pi_finset (λ (i : fin n), finset.Ico 1 N), q n (λ (i : fin n), p (r i) (λ j, z)) = ∑ i in comp_partial_sum_target 0 N N, q.comp_along_composition p i.2 (λ j...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.comp_partial_sum
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "continuous_multilinear_map.map_sum_finset", "finset.Ico", "finset.range", "finset.range_eq_Ico", "fintype.pi_finset", "formal_multilinear_series", "formal_multilinear_series.partial_sum" ]
Composing the partial sums of two multilinear series coincides with the sum over all compositions in `comp_partial_sum_target 0 N N`. This is precisely the motivation for the definition of `comp_partial_sum_target`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
has_fpower_series_at.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G} {p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F} {x : E} (hg : has_fpower_series_at g q (f x)) (hf : has_fpower_series_at f p x) : has_fpower_series_at (g ∘ f) (q.comp p) x
begin /- Consider `rf` and `rg` such that `f` and `g` have power series expansion on the disks of radius `rf` and `rg`. -/ rcases hg with ⟨rg, Hg⟩, rcases hf with ⟨rf, Hf⟩, /- The terms defining `q.comp p` are geometrically summable in a disk of some radius `r`. -/ rcases q.comp_summable_nnreal p Hg.radius_...
theorem
has_fpower_series_at.comp
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "cauchy_seq", "cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded", "composition", "continuous_at", "continuous_at.comp", "continuous_id", "continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm", "continuous_multilinear_map.sum_apply", "emetric.ball", "emetric.ball_mem_nhds", "emetric.ball_subset_ball", "emetric.is_open_ball"...
If two functions `g` and `f` have power series `q` and `p` respectively at `f x` and `x`, then `g ∘ f` admits the power series `q.comp p` at `x`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
analytic_at.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E} (hg : analytic_at 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : analytic_at 𝕜 f x) : analytic_at 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x
let ⟨q, hq⟩ := hg, ⟨p, hp⟩ := hf in (hq.comp hp).analytic_at
theorem
analytic_at.comp
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "analytic_at" ]
If two functions `g` and `f` are analytic respectively at `f x` and `x`, then `g ∘ f` is analytic at `x`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sigma_composition_eq_iff (i j : Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length) : i = j ↔ i.1.blocks = j.1.blocks ∧ i.2.blocks = j.2.blocks
begin refine ⟨by rintro rfl; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, _⟩, rcases i with ⟨a, b⟩, rcases j with ⟨a', b'⟩, rintros ⟨h, h'⟩, have H : a = a', by { ext1, exact h }, induction H, congr, ext1, exact h' end
lemma
composition.sigma_composition_eq_iff
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition" ]
Rewriting equality in the dependent type `Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length)` in non-dependent terms with lists, requiring that the blocks coincide.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sigma_pi_composition_eq_iff (u v : Σ (c : composition n), Π (i : fin c.length), composition (c.blocks_fun i)) : u = v ↔ of_fn (λ i, (u.2 i).blocks) = of_fn (λ i, (v.2 i).blocks)
begin refine ⟨λ H, by rw H, λ H, _⟩, rcases u with ⟨a, b⟩, rcases v with ⟨a', b'⟩, dsimp at H, have h : a = a', { ext1, have : map list.sum (of_fn (λ (i : fin (composition.length a)), (b i).blocks)) = map list.sum (of_fn (λ (i : fin (composition.length a')), (b' i).blocks)), by rw H, simp only...
lemma
composition.sigma_pi_composition_eq_iff
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "composition.length", "composition.of_fn_blocks_fun", "heq_iff_eq", "list.sum" ]
Rewriting equality in the dependent type `Σ (c : composition n), Π (i : fin c.length), composition (c.blocks_fun i)` in non-dependent terms with lists, requiring that the lists of blocks coincide.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
gather (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length) : composition n
{ blocks := (a.blocks.split_wrt_composition b).map sum, blocks_pos := begin rw forall_mem_map_iff, intros j hj, suffices H : ∀ i ∈ j, 1 ≤ i, from calc 0 < j.length : length_pos_of_mem_split_wrt_composition hj ... ≤ j.sum : length_le_sum_of_one_le _ H, intros i hi, apply a.one_le...
def
composition.gather
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition" ]
When `a` is a composition of `n` and `b` is a composition of `a.length`, `a.gather b` is the composition of `n` obtained by gathering all the blocks of `a` corresponding to a block of `b`. For instance, if `a = [6, 5, 3, 5, 2]` and `b = [2, 3]`, one should gather together the first two blocks of `a` and its last three ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
length_gather (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length) : length (a.gather b) = b.length
show (map list.sum (a.blocks.split_wrt_composition b)).length = b.blocks.length, by rw [length_map, length_split_wrt_composition]
lemma
composition.length_gather
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "list.sum" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sigma_composition_aux (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length) (i : fin (a.gather b).length) : composition ((a.gather b).blocks_fun i)
{ blocks := nth_le (a.blocks.split_wrt_composition b) i (by { rw [length_split_wrt_composition, ← length_gather], exact i.2 }), blocks_pos := assume i hi, a.blocks_pos (by { rw ← a.blocks.join_split_wrt_composition b, exact mem_join_of_mem (nth_le_mem _ _ _) hi }), blocks_sum := by simp only [comp...
def
composition.sigma_composition_aux
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "composition.blocks_fun", "composition.gather" ]
An auxiliary function used in the definition of `sigma_equiv_sigma_pi` below, associating to two compositions `a` of `n` and `b` of `a.length`, and an index `i` bounded by the length of `a.gather b`, the subcomposition of `a` made of those blocks belonging to the `i`-th block of `a.gather b`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
length_sigma_composition_aux (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length) (i : fin b.length) : composition.length (composition.sigma_composition_aux a b ⟨i, (length_gather a b).symm ▸ i.2⟩) = composition.blocks_fun b i
show list.length (nth_le (split_wrt_composition a.blocks b) i _) = blocks_fun b i, by { rw [nth_le_map_rev list.length, nth_le_of_eq (map_length_split_wrt_composition _ _)], refl }
lemma
composition.length_sigma_composition_aux
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "composition.blocks_fun", "composition.length", "composition.sigma_composition_aux" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
blocks_fun_sigma_composition_aux (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length) (i : fin b.length) (j : fin (blocks_fun b i)) : blocks_fun (sigma_composition_aux a b ⟨i, (length_gather a b).symm ▸ i.2⟩) ⟨j, (length_sigma_composition_aux a b i).symm ▸ j.2⟩ = blocks_fun a (embedding b i j)
show nth_le (nth_le _ _ _) _ _ = nth_le a.blocks _ _, by { rw [nth_le_of_eq (nth_le_split_wrt_composition _ _ _), nth_le_drop', nth_le_take'], refl }
lemma
composition.blocks_fun_sigma_composition_aux
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "embedding" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
size_up_to_size_up_to_add (a : composition n) (b : composition a.length) {i j : ℕ} (hi : i < b.length) (hj : j < blocks_fun b ⟨i, hi⟩) : size_up_to a (size_up_to b i + j) = size_up_to (a.gather b) i + (size_up_to (sigma_composition_aux a b ⟨i, (length_gather a b).symm ▸ hi⟩) j)
begin induction j with j IHj, { show sum (take ((b.blocks.take i).sum) a.blocks) = sum (take i (map sum (split_wrt_composition a.blocks b))), induction i with i IH, { refl }, { have A : i < b.length := nat.lt_of_succ_lt hi, have B : i < list.length (map list.sum (split_wrt_composition a.bloc...
lemma
composition.size_up_to_size_up_to_add
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "composition.blocks_pos'", "fin.coe_mk", "list.sum", "lt_add_one" ]
Auxiliary lemma to prove that the composition of formal multilinear series is associative. Consider a composition `a` of `n` and a composition `b` of `a.length`. Grouping together some blocks of `a` according to `b` as in `a.gather b`, one can compute the total size of the blocks of `a` up to an index `size_up_to b i ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
sigma_equiv_sigma_pi (n : ℕ) : (Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length) ≃ (Σ (c : composition n), Π (i : fin c.length), composition (c.blocks_fun i))
{ to_fun := λ i, ⟨i.1.gather i.2, i.1.sigma_composition_aux i.2⟩, inv_fun := λ i, ⟨ { blocks := (of_fn (λ j, (i.2 j).blocks)).join, blocks_pos := begin simp only [and_imp, list.mem_join, exists_imp_distrib, forall_mem_of_fn_iff], exact λ i j hj, composition.blocks_pos _ hj end, ...
def
composition.sigma_equiv_sigma_pi
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "and_imp", "composition", "composition.blocks_pos'", "composition.gather", "composition.length", "composition.length_gather", "composition.length_pos_of_pos", "composition.of_fn_blocks_fun", "composition.sigma_composition_aux", "composition.sum_blocks_fun", "exists_imp_distrib", "fin.heq_fun_i...
Natural equivalence between `(Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length)` and `(Σ (c : composition n), Π (i : fin c.length), composition (c.blocks_fun i))`, that shows up as a change of variables in the proof that composition of formal multilinear series is associative. Consider a composition `a` of `n` and a compos...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_assoc (r : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 G H) (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F G) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) : (r.comp q).comp p = r.comp (q.comp p)
begin ext n v, /- First, rewrite the two compositions appearing in the theorem as two sums over complicated sigma types, as in the description of the proof above. -/ let f : (Σ (a : composition n), composition a.length) → H := λ c, r c.2.length (apply_composition q c.2 (apply_composition p c.1 v)), let g ...
theorem
formal_multilinear_series.comp_assoc
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/composition.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "combinatorics.composition" ]
[ "composition", "composition.embedding", "composition.length_gather", "continuous_multilinear_map.map_sum", "continuous_multilinear_map.sum_apply", "formal_multilinear_series", "formal_multilinear_series.comp" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
left_inv (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F E
| 0 := 0 | 1 := (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 F E).symm i.symm | (n+2) := - ∑ c : {c : composition (n+2) // c.length < n + 2}, have (c : composition (n+2)).length < n+2 := c.2, (left_inv (c : composition (n+2)).length).comp_along_composition (p.comp_continuous_linear_map i.symm) c
def
formal_multilinear_series.left_inv
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "composition", "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1", "formal_multilinear_series" ]
The left inverse of a formal multilinear series, where the `n`-th term is defined inductively in terms of the previous ones to make sure that `(left_inv p i) ∘ p = id`. For this, the linear term `p₁` in `p` should be invertible. In the definition, `i` is a linear isomorphism that should coincide with `p₁`, so that one ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
left_inv_coeff_zero (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : p.left_inv i 0 = 0
by rw left_inv
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.left_inv_coeff_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "formal_multilinear_series" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
left_inv_coeff_one (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : p.left_inv i 1 = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 F E).symm i.symm
by rw left_inv
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.left_inv_coeff_one
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1", "formal_multilinear_series" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
left_inv_remove_zero (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : p.remove_zero.left_inv i = p.left_inv i
begin ext1 n, induction n using nat.strong_rec' with n IH, cases n, { simp }, -- if one replaces `simp` with `refl`, the proof times out in the kernel. cases n, { simp }, -- TODO: why? simp only [left_inv, neg_inj], refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λ c cuniv, _), rcases c with ⟨c, hc⟩, ext v, dsimp, sim...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.left_inv_remove_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "formal_multilinear_series", "nat.strong_rec'" ]
The left inverse does not depend on the zeroth coefficient of a formal multilinear series.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
left_inv_comp (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) (h : p 1 = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F).symm i) : (left_inv p i).comp p = id 𝕜 E
begin ext n v, cases n, { simp only [left_inv, continuous_multilinear_map.zero_apply, id_apply_ne_one, ne.def, not_false_iff, zero_ne_one, comp_coeff_zero']}, cases n, { simp only [left_inv, comp_coeff_one, h, id_apply_one, continuous_linear_equiv.coe_apply, continuous_linear_equiv.symm_apply_appl...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.left_inv_comp
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "composition", "composition.length", "composition.length_le", "composition.ones", "composition.ones_length", "continuous_linear_equiv.coe_apply", "continuous_linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply", "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1", "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1_symm_apply", "continuous_multilinear...
The left inverse to a formal multilinear series is indeed a left inverse, provided its linear term is invertible.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
right_inv (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F E
| 0 := 0 | 1 := (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 F E).symm i.symm | (n+2) := let q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F E := λ k, if h : k < n + 2 then right_inv k else 0 in - (i.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp_continuous_multilinear_map ((p.comp q) (n+2))
def
formal_multilinear_series.right_inv
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1", "formal_multilinear_series" ]
The right inverse of a formal multilinear series, where the `n`-th term is defined inductively in terms of the previous ones to make sure that `p ∘ (right_inv p i) = id`. For this, the linear term `p₁` in `p` should be invertible. In the definition, `i` is a linear isomorphism that should coincide with `p₁`, so that on...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
right_inv_coeff_zero (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : p.right_inv i 0 = 0
by rw right_inv
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.right_inv_coeff_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "formal_multilinear_series" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
right_inv_coeff_one (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : p.right_inv i 1 = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 F E).symm i.symm
by rw right_inv
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.right_inv_coeff_one
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1", "formal_multilinear_series" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
right_inv_remove_zero (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : p.remove_zero.right_inv i = p.right_inv i
begin ext1 n, induction n using nat.strong_rec' with n IH, rcases n with _|_|n, { simp only [right_inv_coeff_zero] }, { simp only [right_inv_coeff_one] }, simp only [right_inv, neg_inj], rw remove_zero_comp_of_pos _ _ (add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (n.zero_le) zero_lt_two), congr' 2 with k, by_cases hk : k...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.right_inv_remove_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "formal_multilinear_series", "nat.strong_rec'", "zero_lt_two" ]
The right inverse does not depend on the zeroth coefficient of a formal multilinear series.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_right_inv_aux1 {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (q : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 F E) (v : fin n → F) : p.comp q n v = (∑ (c : composition n) in {c : composition n | 1 < c.length}.to_finset, p c.length (q.apply_composition c v)) + p 1 (λ i, q n v)
begin have A : (finset.univ : finset (composition n)) = {c | 1 < composition.length c}.to_finset ∪ {composition.single n hn}, { refine subset.antisymm (λ c hc, _) (subset_univ _), by_cases h : 1 < c.length, { simp [h] }, { have : c.length = 1, by { refine (eq_iff_le_not_lt.2 ⟨ _, h⟩).symm, e...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.comp_right_inv_aux1
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "composition", "composition.eq_single_iff_length", "composition.length", "composition.single", "composition.single_length", "disjoint", "finset", "finset.univ", "formal_multilinear_series", "formal_multilinear_series.comp", "set.to_finset_set_of" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_right_inv_aux2 (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) (n : ℕ) (v : fin (n + 2) → F) : ∑ (c : composition (n + 2)) in {c : composition (n + 2) | 1 < c.length}.to_finset, p c.length (apply_composition (λ (k : ℕ), ite (k < n + 2) (p.right_inv i k) 0) c v) = ∑ (c : composition (n + 2)) in {c...
begin have N : 0 < n + 2, by dec_trivial, refine sum_congr rfl (λ c hc, p.congr rfl (λ j hj1 hj2, _)), have : ∀ k, c.blocks_fun k < n + 2, { simp only [set.mem_to_finset, set.mem_set_of_eq] at hc, simp [← composition.ne_single_iff N, composition.eq_single_iff_length, ne_of_gt hc] }, simp [apply_compositio...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.comp_right_inv_aux2
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "composition", "composition.eq_single_iff_length", "composition.ne_single_iff", "formal_multilinear_series", "set.mem_to_finset" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
comp_right_inv (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) (h : p 1 = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F).symm i) (h0 : p 0 = 0) : p.comp (right_inv p i) = id 𝕜 F
begin ext n v, cases n, { simp only [h0, continuous_multilinear_map.zero_apply, id_apply_ne_one, ne.def, not_false_iff, zero_ne_one, comp_coeff_zero']}, cases n, { simp only [comp_coeff_one, h, right_inv, continuous_linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply, id_apply_one, continuous_linear_equiv.coe_apply, co...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.comp_right_inv
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "continuous_linear_equiv.apply_symm_apply", "continuous_linear_equiv.coe_apply", "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1", "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1_symm_apply", "continuous_multilinear_map.zero_apply", "formal_multilinear_series", "set.to_finset_set_of", "zero_ne_one" ]
The right inverse to a formal multilinear series is indeed a right inverse, provided its linear term is invertible and its constant term vanishes.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
right_inv_coeff (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) (n : ℕ) (hn : 2 ≤ n) : p.right_inv i n = - (i.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp_continuous_multilinear_map (∑ c in ({c | 1 < composition.length c}.to_finset : finset (composition n)), p.comp_along_composition (p.right_inv i) c)
begin cases n, { exact false.elim (zero_lt_two.not_le hn) }, cases n, { exact false.elim (one_lt_two.not_le hn) }, simp only [right_inv, neg_inj], congr' 1, ext v, have N : 0 < n + 2, by dec_trivial, have : (p 1) (λ (i : fin 1), 0) = 0 := continuous_multilinear_map.map_zero _, simp [comp_right_inv_aux1 ...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.right_inv_coeff
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "composition", "composition.length", "continuous_multilinear_map.map_zero", "finset", "formal_multilinear_series", "set.to_finset_set_of" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
left_inv_eq_right_inv_aux (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) (h : p 1 = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F).symm i) (h0 : p 0 = 0) : left_inv p i = right_inv p i
calc left_inv p i = (left_inv p i).comp (id 𝕜 F) : by simp ... = (left_inv p i).comp (p.comp (right_inv p i)) : by rw comp_right_inv p i h h0 ... = ((left_inv p i).comp p).comp (right_inv p i) : by rw comp_assoc ... = (id 𝕜 E).comp (right_inv p i) : by rw left_inv_comp p i h ... = right_inv p i : by simp
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.left_inv_eq_right_inv_aux
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1", "formal_multilinear_series" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
left_inv_eq_right_inv (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) (h : p 1 = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F).symm i) : left_inv p i = right_inv p i
calc left_inv p i = left_inv p.remove_zero i : by rw left_inv_remove_zero ... = right_inv p.remove_zero i : by { apply left_inv_eq_right_inv_aux; simp [h] } ... = right_inv p i : by rw right_inv_remove_zero
theorem
formal_multilinear_series.left_inv_eq_right_inv
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1", "formal_multilinear_series", "left_inv_eq_right_inv" ]
The left inverse and the right inverse of a formal multilinear series coincide. This is not at all obvious from their definition, but it follows from uniqueness of inverses (which comes from the fact that composition is associative on formal multilinear series).
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
radius_right_inv_pos_of_radius_pos_aux1 (n : ℕ) (p : ℕ → ℝ) (hp : ∀ k, 0 ≤ p k) {r a : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ∑ k in Ico 2 (n + 1), a ^ k * (∑ c in ({c | 1 < composition.length c}.to_finset : finset (composition k)), r ^ c.length * ∏ j, p (c.blocks_fun j)) ≤ ∑ j in Ico 2 (n + 1), r ^ j * (...
calc ∑ k in Ico 2 (n + 1), a ^ k * (∑ c in ({c | 1 < composition.length c}.to_finset : finset (composition k)), r ^ c.length * ∏ j, p (c.blocks_fun j)) = ∑ k in Ico 2 (n + 1), (∑ c in ({c | 1 < composition.length c}.to_finset : finset (composition k)), ∏ j, r * (a ^ (c.blocks_fun j) * p (c.blocks_fun j)...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.radius_right_inv_pos_of_radius_pos_aux1
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "composition", "composition.eq_single_iff_length", "composition.length", "composition.ne_single_iff", "composition.single", "composition.sum_blocks_fun", "fin.heq_fun_iff", "finset", "fintype.pi_finset", "mul_pow", "multilinear_map.map_sum_finset", "multilinear_map.mk_pi_algebra", "multiline...
First technical lemma to control the growth of coefficients of the inverse. Bound the explicit expression for `∑_{k<n+1} aᵏ Qₖ` in terms of a sum of powers of the same sum one step before, in a general abstract setup.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
radius_right_inv_pos_of_radius_pos_aux2 {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n + 1) (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) {r a C : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hC : 0 ≤ C) (hp : ∀ n, ‖p n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n) : (∑ k in Ico 1 (n + 1), a ^ k * ‖p.right_inv i k‖) ≤ ‖(i.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)‖ * a + ‖(i.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)...
let I := ‖(i.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)‖ in calc ∑ k in Ico 1 (n + 1), a ^ k * ‖p.right_inv i k‖ = a * I + ∑ k in Ico 2 (n + 1), a ^ k * ‖p.right_inv i k‖ : by simp only [linear_isometry_equiv.norm_map, pow_one, right_inv_coeff_one, nat.Ico_succ_singleton, sum_singleton, ← sum_Ico_consecutive _ one_le_two hn]...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.radius_right_inv_pos_of_radius_pos_aux2
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "composition", "composition.length", "continuous_linear_map.norm_comp_continuous_multilinear_map_le", "finset", "formal_multilinear_series", "linear_isometry_equiv.norm_map", "mul_assoc", "mul_comm", "mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left", "mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right", "mul_pow", "nat.Ico_succ_singleton"...
Second technical lemma to control the growth of coefficients of the inverse. Bound the explicit expression for `∑_{k<n+1} aᵏ Qₖ` in terms of a sum of powers of the same sum one step before, in the specific setup we are interesting in, by reducing to the general bound in `radius_right_inv_pos_of_radius_pos_aux1`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
radius_right_inv_pos_of_radius_pos (p : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (i : E ≃L[𝕜] F) (hp : 0 < p.radius) : 0 < (p.right_inv i).radius
begin obtain ⟨C, r, Cpos, rpos, ple⟩ : ∃ C r (hC : 0 < C) (hr : 0 < r), ∀ (n : ℕ), ‖p n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n := le_mul_pow_of_radius_pos p hp, let I := ‖(i.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)‖, -- choose `a` small enough to make sure that `∑_{k ≤ n} aᵏ Qₖ` will be controllable by -- induction obtain ⟨a, apos, ha1, ha2⟩ : ∃ a (apo...
theorem
formal_multilinear_series.radius_right_inv_pos_of_radius_pos
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/inverse.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.composition", "tactic.congrm" ]
[ "div_le_div", "ennreal", "formal_multilinear_series", "geom_sum_Ico'", "inf_le_left", "mul_assoc", "mul_comm", "mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left", "mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right", "nat.le_induction", "nnreal", "pow_le_pow_of_le_left", "pow_nonneg", "ring", "self_mem_nhds_within", "sq_nonneg", ...
If a a formal multilinear series has a positive radius of convergence, then its right inverse also has a positive radius of convergence.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
has_sum_at_zero (a : ℕ → E) : has_sum (λ n, (0:𝕜) ^ n • a n) (a 0)
by convert has_sum_single 0 (λ b h, _); simp [nat.pos_of_ne_zero h] <|> simp
lemma
has_sum.has_sum_at_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "has_sum", "has_sum_single" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
exists_has_sum_smul_of_apply_eq_zero (hs : has_sum (λ m, z ^ m • a m) s) (ha : ∀ k < n, a k = 0) : ∃ t : E, z ^ n • t = s ∧ has_sum (λ m, z ^ m • a (m + n)) t
begin obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos, { simpa }, by_cases h : z = 0, { have : s = 0 := hs.unique (by simpa [ha 0 hn, h] using has_sum_at_zero a), exact ⟨a n, by simp [h, hn, this], by simpa [h] using has_sum_at_zero (λ m, a (m + n))⟩ }, { refine ⟨(z ^ n)⁻¹ • s, by field_simp [smul_smul], _⟩, have...
lemma
has_sum.exists_has_sum_smul_of_apply_eq_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "finset.range", "has_sum", "has_sum_nat_add_iff'", "inv_pow", "pow_add", "smul_smul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
has_fpower_series_dslope_fslope (hp : has_fpower_series_at f p z₀) : has_fpower_series_at (dslope f z₀) p.fslope z₀
begin have hpd : deriv f z₀ = p.coeff 1 := hp.deriv, have hp0 : p.coeff 0 = f z₀ := hp.coeff_zero 1, simp only [has_fpower_series_at_iff, apply_eq_pow_smul_coeff, coeff_fslope] at hp ⊢, refine hp.mono (λ x hx, _), by_cases h : x = 0, { convert has_sum_single 0 _; intros; simp [*] }, { have hxx : ∀ (n : ℕ)...
lemma
has_fpower_series_at.has_fpower_series_dslope_fslope
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "deriv", "dslope", "has_fpower_series_at", "has_fpower_series_at_iff", "has_sum", "has_sum_nat_add_iff'", "has_sum_single", "pow_succ'", "slope", "smul_smul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope (n : ℕ) (hp : has_fpower_series_at f p z₀) : has_fpower_series_at ((swap dslope z₀)^[n] f) (fslope^[n] p) z₀
begin induction n with n ih generalizing f p, { exact hp }, { simpa using ih (has_fpower_series_dslope_fslope hp) } end
lemma
has_fpower_series_at.has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "dslope", "has_fpower_series_at", "ih" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
iterate_dslope_fslope_ne_zero (hp : has_fpower_series_at f p z₀) (h : p ≠ 0) : (swap dslope z₀)^[p.order] f z₀ ≠ 0
begin rw [← coeff_zero (has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope p.order hp) 1], simpa [coeff_eq_zero] using apply_order_ne_zero h end
lemma
has_fpower_series_at.iterate_dslope_fslope_ne_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "dslope", "has_fpower_series_at" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_pow_order_mul_iterate_dslope (hp : has_fpower_series_at f p z₀) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = (z - z₀) ^ p.order • ((swap dslope z₀)^[p.order] f z)
begin have hq := has_fpower_series_at_iff'.mp (has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope p.order hp), filter_upwards [hq, has_fpower_series_at_iff'.mp hp] with x hx1 hx2, have : ∀ k < p.order, p.coeff k = 0, from λ k hk, by simpa [coeff_eq_zero] using apply_eq_zero_of_lt_order hk, obtain ⟨s, hs1, hs2⟩ := has_...
lemma
has_fpower_series_at.eq_pow_order_mul_iterate_dslope
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "dslope", "has_fpower_series_at", "has_sum.exists_has_sum_smul_of_apply_eq_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
locally_ne_zero (hp : has_fpower_series_at f p z₀) (h : p ≠ 0) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z ≠ 0
begin rw [eventually_nhds_within_iff], have h2 := (has_fpower_series_iterate_dslope_fslope p.order hp).continuous_at, have h3 := h2.eventually_ne (iterate_dslope_fslope_ne_zero hp h), filter_upwards [eq_pow_order_mul_iterate_dslope hp, h3] with z e1 e2 e3, simpa [e1, e2, e3] using pow_ne_zero p.order (sub_ne_...
lemma
has_fpower_series_at.locally_ne_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "continuous_at", "eventually_nhds_within_iff", "has_fpower_series_at", "pow_ne_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
locally_zero_iff (hp : has_fpower_series_at f p z₀) : (∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = 0) ↔ p = 0
⟨λ hf, hp.eq_zero_of_eventually hf, λ h, eventually_eq_zero (by rwa h at hp)⟩
lemma
has_fpower_series_at.locally_zero_iff
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "has_fpower_series_at" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero (hf : analytic_at 𝕜 f z₀) : (∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = 0) ∨ (∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z ≠ 0)
begin rcases hf with ⟨p, hp⟩, by_cases h : p = 0, { exact or.inl (has_fpower_series_at.eventually_eq_zero (by rwa h at hp)) }, { exact or.inr (hp.locally_ne_zero h) } end
theorem
analytic_at.eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "analytic_at", "has_fpower_series_at.eventually_eq_zero" ]
The *principle of isolated zeros* for an analytic function, local version: if a function is analytic at `z₀`, then either it is identically zero in a neighborhood of `z₀`, or it does not vanish in a punctured neighborhood of `z₀`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eventually_eq_or_eventually_ne (hf : analytic_at 𝕜 f z₀) (hg : analytic_at 𝕜 g z₀) : (∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = g z) ∨ (∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z ≠ g z)
by simpa [sub_eq_zero] using (hf.sub hg).eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero
lemma
analytic_at.eventually_eq_or_eventually_ne
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "analytic_at" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
frequently_zero_iff_eventually_zero {f : 𝕜 → E} {w : 𝕜} (hf : analytic_at 𝕜 f w) : (∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] w, f z = 0) ↔ (∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 w, f z = 0)
⟨hf.eventually_eq_zero_or_eventually_ne_zero.resolve_right, λ h, (h.filter_mono nhds_within_le_nhds).frequently⟩
lemma
analytic_at.frequently_zero_iff_eventually_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "analytic_at", "nhds_within_le_nhds" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
frequently_eq_iff_eventually_eq (hf : analytic_at 𝕜 f z₀) (hg : analytic_at 𝕜 g z₀) : (∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z = g z) ↔ (∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 z₀, f z = g z)
by simpa [sub_eq_zero] using frequently_zero_iff_eventually_zero (hf.sub hg)
lemma
analytic_at.frequently_eq_iff_eventually_eq
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "analytic_at" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq_zero (hf : analytic_on 𝕜 f U) (hU : is_preconnected U) (h₀ : z₀ ∈ U) (hfw : ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z = 0) : eq_on f 0 U
hf.eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_eventually_eq_zero hU h₀ ((hf z₀ h₀).frequently_zero_iff_eventually_zero.1 hfw)
theorem
analytic_on.eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "analytic_on", "is_preconnected" ]
The *principle of isolated zeros* for an analytic function, global version: if a function is analytic on a connected set `U` and vanishes in arbitrary neighborhoods of a point `z₀ ∈ U`, then it is identically zero in `U`. For higher-dimensional versions requiring that the function vanishes in a neighborhood of `z₀`, se...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_mem_closure (hf : analytic_on 𝕜 f U) (hU : is_preconnected U) (h₀ : z₀ ∈ U) (hfz₀ : z₀ ∈ closure ({z | f z = 0} \ {z₀})) : eq_on f 0 U
hf.eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq_zero hU h₀ (mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within.mp hfz₀)
theorem
analytic_on.eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_mem_closure
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "analytic_on", "closure", "is_preconnected" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_on_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq (hf : analytic_on 𝕜 f U) (hg : analytic_on 𝕜 g U) (hU : is_preconnected U) (h₀ : z₀ ∈ U) (hfg : ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z = g z) : eq_on f g U
begin have hfg' : ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, (f - g) z = 0 := hfg.mono (λ z h, by rw [pi.sub_apply, h, sub_self]), simpa [sub_eq_zero] using λ z hz, (hf.sub hg).eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq_zero hU h₀ hfg' hz end
theorem
analytic_on.eq_on_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "analytic_on", "is_preconnected" ]
The *identity principle* for analytic functions, global version: if two functions are analytic on a connected set `U` and coincide at points which accumulate to a point `z₀ ∈ U`, then they coincide globally in `U`. For higher-dimensional versions requiring that the functions coincide in a neighborhood of `z₀`, see `eq_...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_on_of_preconnected_of_mem_closure (hf : analytic_on 𝕜 f U) (hg : analytic_on 𝕜 g U) (hU : is_preconnected U) (h₀ : z₀ ∈ U) (hfg : z₀ ∈ closure ({z | f z = g z} \ {z₀})) : eq_on f g U
hf.eq_on_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq hg hU h₀ (mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within.mp hfg)
theorem
analytic_on.eq_on_of_preconnected_of_mem_closure
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "analytic_on", "closure", "is_preconnected" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_of_frequently_eq [connected_space 𝕜] (hf : analytic_on 𝕜 f univ) (hg : analytic_on 𝕜 g univ) (hfg : ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] z₀, f z = g z) : f = g
funext (λ x, eq_on_of_preconnected_of_frequently_eq hf hg is_preconnected_univ (mem_univ z₀) hfg (mem_univ x))
theorem
analytic_on.eq_of_frequently_eq
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/isolated_zeros.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.calculus.dslope", "analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic", "analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series", "analysis.analytic.uniqueness" ]
[ "analytic_on", "connected_space" ]
The *identity principle* for analytic functions, global version: if two functions on a normed field `𝕜` are analytic everywhere and coincide at points which accumulate to a point `z₀`, then they coincide globally. For higher-dimensional versions requiring that the functions coincide in a neighborhood of `z₀`, see `eq_...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
fpower_series (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F
| 0 := continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 _ (f x) | 1 := (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F).symm f | _ := 0
def
continuous_linear_map.fpower_series
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[ "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1", "continuous_multilinear_map.curry0", "formal_multilinear_series" ]
Formal power series of a continuous linear map `f : E →L[𝕜] F` at `x : E`: `f y = f x + f (y - x)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
fpower_series_apply_add_two (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (n : ℕ) : f.fpower_series x (n + 2) = 0
rfl
lemma
continuous_linear_map.fpower_series_apply_add_two
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
fpower_series_radius (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) : (f.fpower_series x).radius = ∞
(f.fpower_series x).radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero 2 $ λ n, rfl
lemma
continuous_linear_map.fpower_series_radius
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
has_fpower_series_on_ball (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) : has_fpower_series_on_ball f (f.fpower_series x) x ∞
{ r_le := by simp, r_pos := ennreal.coe_lt_top, has_sum := λ y _, (has_sum_nat_add_iff' 2).1 $ by simp [finset.sum_range_succ, ← sub_sub, has_sum_zero] }
theorem
continuous_linear_map.has_fpower_series_on_ball
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[ "ennreal.coe_lt_top", "has_fpower_series_on_ball", "has_sum", "has_sum_nat_add_iff'", "has_sum_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
has_fpower_series_at (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) : has_fpower_series_at f (f.fpower_series x) x
⟨∞, f.has_fpower_series_on_ball x⟩
theorem
continuous_linear_map.has_fpower_series_at
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[ "has_fpower_series_at" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
analytic_at (f : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) : analytic_at 𝕜 f x
(f.has_fpower_series_at x).analytic_at
theorem
continuous_linear_map.analytic_at
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[ "analytic_at" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
uncurry_bilinear (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) : (E × F) [×2]→L[𝕜] G
@continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left 𝕜 1 (λ _, E × F) G _ _ _ _ _ $ (↑(continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 (E × F) G).symm : (E × F →L[𝕜] G) →L[𝕜] _).comp $ f.bilinear_comp (fst _ _ _) (snd _ _ _)
def
continuous_linear_map.uncurry_bilinear
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[ "continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left", "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1" ]
Reinterpret a bilinear map `f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G` as a multilinear map `(E × F) [×2]→L[𝕜] G`. This multilinear map is the second term in the formal multilinear series expansion of `uncurry f`. It is given by `f.uncurry_bilinear ![(x, y), (x', y')] = f x y'`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
uncurry_bilinear_apply (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (m : fin 2 → E × F) : f.uncurry_bilinear m = f (m 0).1 (m 1).2
rfl
lemma
continuous_linear_map.uncurry_bilinear_apply
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
fpower_series_bilinear (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (x : E × F) : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 (E × F) G
| 0 := continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 _ (f x.1 x.2) | 1 := (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 (E × F) G).symm (f.deriv₂ x) | 2 := f.uncurry_bilinear | _ := 0
def
continuous_linear_map.fpower_series_bilinear
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[ "continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1", "continuous_multilinear_map.curry0", "formal_multilinear_series" ]
Formal multilinear series expansion of a bilinear function `f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
fpower_series_bilinear_radius (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (x : E × F) : (f.fpower_series_bilinear x).radius = ∞
(f.fpower_series_bilinear x).radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero 3 $ λ n, rfl
lemma
continuous_linear_map.fpower_series_bilinear_radius
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
has_fpower_series_on_ball_bilinear (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (x : E × F) : has_fpower_series_on_ball (λ x : E × F, f x.1 x.2) (f.fpower_series_bilinear x) x ∞
{ r_le := by simp, r_pos := ennreal.coe_lt_top, has_sum := λ y _, (has_sum_nat_add_iff' 3).1 $ begin simp only [finset.sum_range_succ, finset.sum_range_one, prod.fst_add, prod.snd_add, f.map_add_add], dsimp, simp only [add_comm, sub_self, has_sum_zero] end }
theorem
continuous_linear_map.has_fpower_series_on_ball_bilinear
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[ "ennreal.coe_lt_top", "has_fpower_series_on_ball", "has_sum", "has_sum_nat_add_iff'", "has_sum_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
has_fpower_series_at_bilinear (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (x : E × F) : has_fpower_series_at (λ x : E × F, f x.1 x.2) (f.fpower_series_bilinear x) x
⟨∞, f.has_fpower_series_on_ball_bilinear x⟩
theorem
continuous_linear_map.has_fpower_series_at_bilinear
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[ "has_fpower_series_at" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
analytic_at_bilinear (f : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G) (x : E × F) : analytic_at 𝕜 (λ x : E × F, f x.1 x.2) x
(f.has_fpower_series_at_bilinear x).analytic_at
theorem
continuous_linear_map.analytic_at_bilinear
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/linear.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic" ]
[ "analytic_at" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
radius_eq_liminf : p.radius = liminf (λ n, 1/((‖p n‖₊) ^ (1 / (n : ℝ)) : ℝ≥0)) at_top
begin have : ∀ (r : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → ((r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ 1 / ↑(‖p n‖₊ ^ (1 / (n : ℝ))) ↔ ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ 1), { intros r n hn, have : 0 < (n : ℝ) := nat.cast_pos.2 hn, conv_lhs {rw [one_div, ennreal.le_inv_iff_mul_le, ← ennreal.coe_mul, ennreal.coe_le_one_iff, one_div, ← nnreal.rpow_one r, ← mul_in...
lemma
formal_multilinear_series.radius_eq_liminf
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/radius_liminf.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.basic", "analysis.special_functions.pow.nnreal" ]
[ "ennreal.coe_le_one_iff", "ennreal.coe_mul", "ennreal.le_inv_iff_mul_le", "ennreal.le_of_forall_nnreal_lt", "le_abs_self", "mul_comm", "mul_inv_cancel", "nnreal.mul_rpow", "nnreal.one_rpow", "nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_iff", "nnreal.rpow_mul", "nnreal.rpow_nat_cast", "nnreal.rpow_one", "one_div",...
The radius of a formal multilinear series is equal to $\liminf_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt[n]{‖p n‖}}$. The actual statement uses `ℝ≥0` and some coercions.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_eventually_eq_zero_aux [complete_space F] {f : E → F} {U : set E} (hf : analytic_on 𝕜 f U) (hU : is_preconnected U) {z₀ : E} (h₀ : z₀ ∈ U) (hfz₀ : f =ᶠ[𝓝 z₀] 0) : eq_on f 0 U
begin /- Let `u` be the set of points around which `f` vanishes. It is clearly open. We have to show that its limit points in `U` still belong to it, from which the inclusion `U ⊆ u` will follow by connectedness. -/ let u := {x | f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 0}, suffices main : closure u ∩ U ⊆ u, { have Uu : U ⊆ u, from ...
theorem
analytic_on.eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_eventually_eq_zero_aux
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/uniqueness.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.linear", "analysis.analytic.composition", "analysis.normed_space.completion" ]
[ "analytic_on", "closure", "complete_space", "emetric.ball", "ennreal.add_halves", "ennreal.coe_ne_top", "ennreal.half_le_self", "ennreal.half_pos", "ennreal.le_sub_of_add_le_left", "has_fpower_series_at", "has_fpower_series_on_ball", "has_sum", "has_sum.unique", "has_sum_zero", "is_open_...
If an analytic function vanishes around a point, then it is uniformly zero along a connected set. Superseded by `eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_locally_zero` which does not assume completeness of the target space.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_eventually_eq_zero {f : E → F} {U : set E} (hf : analytic_on 𝕜 f U) (hU : is_preconnected U) {z₀ : E} (h₀ : z₀ ∈ U) (hfz₀ : f =ᶠ[𝓝 z₀] 0) : eq_on f 0 U
begin let F' := uniform_space.completion F, set e : F →L[𝕜] F' := uniform_space.completion.to_complL, have : analytic_on 𝕜 (e ∘ f) U := λ x hx, (e.analytic_at _).comp (hf x hx), have A : eq_on (e ∘ f) 0 U, { apply eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_eventually_eq_zero_aux this hU h₀, filter_upwards [hfz₀] wit...
theorem
analytic_on.eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_eventually_eq_zero
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/uniqueness.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.linear", "analysis.analytic.composition", "analysis.normed_space.completion" ]
[ "analytic_on", "is_preconnected", "uniform_space.completion", "uniform_space.completion.coe_injective", "uniform_space.completion.to_complL" ]
The *identity principle* for analytic functions: If an analytic function vanishes in a whole neighborhood of a point `z₀`, then it is uniformly zero along a connected set. For a one-dimensional version assuming only that the function vanishes at some points arbitrarily close to `z₀`, see `eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_on_of_preconnected_of_eventually_eq {f g : E → F} {U : set E} (hf : analytic_on 𝕜 f U) (hg : analytic_on 𝕜 g U) (hU : is_preconnected U) {z₀ : E} (h₀ : z₀ ∈ U) (hfg : f =ᶠ[𝓝 z₀] g) : eq_on f g U
begin have hfg' : (f - g) =ᶠ[𝓝 z₀] 0 := hfg.mono (λ z h, by simp [h]), simpa [sub_eq_zero] using λ z hz, (hf.sub hg).eq_on_zero_of_preconnected_of_eventually_eq_zero hU h₀ hfg' hz, end
theorem
analytic_on.eq_on_of_preconnected_of_eventually_eq
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/uniqueness.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.linear", "analysis.analytic.composition", "analysis.normed_space.completion" ]
[ "analytic_on", "is_preconnected" ]
The *identity principle* for analytic functions: If two analytic functions coincide in a whole neighborhood of a point `z₀`, then they coincide globally along a connected set. For a one-dimensional version assuming only that the functions coincide at some points arbitrarily close to `z₀`, see `eq_on_of_preconnected_of_...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
eq_of_eventually_eq {f g : E → F} [preconnected_space E] (hf : analytic_on 𝕜 f univ) (hg : analytic_on 𝕜 g univ) {z₀ : E} (hfg : f =ᶠ[𝓝 z₀] g) : f = g
funext (λ x, eq_on_of_preconnected_of_eventually_eq hf hg is_preconnected_univ (mem_univ z₀) hfg (mem_univ x))
theorem
analytic_on.eq_of_eventually_eq
analysis.analytic
src/analysis/analytic/uniqueness.lean
[ "analysis.analytic.linear", "analysis.analytic.composition", "analysis.normed_space.completion" ]
[ "analytic_on", "preconnected_space" ]
The *identity principle* for analytic functions: If two analytic functions on a normed space coincide in a neighborhood of a point `z₀`, then they coincide everywhere. For a one-dimensional version assuming only that the functions coincide at some points arbitrarily close to `z₀`, see `eq_of_frequently_eq`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O_with (c : ℝ) (l : filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop
∀ᶠ x in l, ‖ f x ‖ ≤ c * ‖ g x ‖
def
asymptotics.is_O_with
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[ "filter" ]
This version of the Landau notation `is_O_with C l f g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by `C * ‖g‖`. In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded by `C`, modulo division by zero issues that are avoided by this definition...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O_with_iff : is_O_with c l f g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖
by rw is_O_with
lemma
asymptotics.is_O_with_iff
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
Definition of `is_O_with`. We record it in a lemma as `is_O_with` is irreducible.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O (l : filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop
∃ c : ℝ, is_O_with c l f g
def
asymptotics.is_O
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[ "filter" ]
The Landau notation `f =O[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by a constant multiple of `‖g‖`. In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded, modulo division by zero issues that are avoided by this definition.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O_iff_is_O_with : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, is_O_with c l f g
by rw is_O
lemma
asymptotics.is_O_iff_is_O_with
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
Definition of `is_O` in terms of `is_O_with`. We record it in a lemma as `is_O` is irreducible.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O_iff : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖
by simp only [is_O, is_O_with]
lemma
asymptotics.is_O_iff
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
Definition of `is_O` in terms of filters. We record it in a lemma as we will set `is_O` to be irreducible at the end of this file.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O.of_bound (c : ℝ) (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g
is_O_iff.2 ⟨c, h⟩
lemma
asymptotics.is_O.of_bound
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O.of_bound' (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g
is_O.of_bound 1 $ by { simp_rw one_mul, exact h }
lemma
asymptotics.is_O.of_bound'
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[ "one_mul" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O.bound : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖
is_O_iff.1
lemma
asymptotics.is_O.bound
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_o (l : filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop
∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → is_O_with c l f g
def
asymptotics.is_o
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[ "filter" ]
The Landau notation `f =o[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by an arbitrarily small constant multiple of `‖g‖`. In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` tends to `0` along `l`, modulo division by zero issues that are avoided by this de...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_o_iff_forall_is_O_with : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → is_O_with c l f g
by rw is_o
lemma
asymptotics.is_o_iff_forall_is_O_with
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
Definition of `is_o` in terms of `is_O_with`. We record it in a lemma as we will set `is_o` to be irreducible at the end of this file.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_o_iff : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖
by simp only [is_o, is_O_with]
lemma
asymptotics.is_o_iff
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
Definition of `is_o` in terms of filters. We record it in a lemma as we will set `is_o` to be irreducible at the end of this file.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_o.def (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖
is_o_iff.1 h hc
lemma
asymptotics.is_o.def
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_o.def' (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : is_O_with c l f g
is_O_with_iff.2 $ is_o_iff.1 h hc
lemma
asymptotics.is_o.def'
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O_with.is_O (h : is_O_with c l f g) : f =O[l] g
by rw is_O; exact ⟨c, h⟩
theorem
asymptotics.is_O_with.is_O
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_o.is_O_with (hgf : f =o[l] g) : is_O_with 1 l f g
hgf.def' zero_lt_one
theorem
asymptotics.is_o.is_O_with
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[ "zero_lt_one" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_o.is_O (hgf : f =o[l] g) : f =O[l] g
hgf.is_O_with.is_O
theorem
asymptotics.is_o.is_O
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O.is_O_with : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, is_O_with c l f g
is_O_iff_is_O_with.1
lemma
asymptotics.is_O.is_O_with
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O_with.weaken (h : is_O_with c l f g') (hc : c ≤ c') : is_O_with c' l f g'
is_O_with.of_bound $ mem_of_superset h.bound $ λ x hx, calc ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ : hx ... ≤ _ : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hc (norm_nonneg _)
theorem
asymptotics.is_O_with.weaken
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[ "mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O_with.exists_pos (h : is_O_with c l f g') : ∃ c' (H : 0 < c'), is_O_with c' l f g'
⟨max c 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right c 1), h.weaken $ le_max_left c 1⟩
theorem
asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_pos
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[ "zero_lt_one" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O.exists_pos (h : f =O[l] g') : ∃ c (H : 0 < c), is_O_with c l f g'
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := h.is_O_with in hc.exists_pos
theorem
asymptotics.is_O.exists_pos
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O_with.exists_nonneg (h : is_O_with c l f g') : ∃ c' (H : 0 ≤ c'), is_O_with c' l f g'
let ⟨c, cpos, hc⟩ := h.exists_pos in ⟨c, le_of_lt cpos, hc⟩
theorem
asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_nonneg
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_O.exists_nonneg (h : f =O[l] g') : ∃ c (H : 0 ≤ c), is_O_with c l f g'
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := h.is_O_with in hc.exists_nonneg
theorem
asymptotics.is_O.exists_nonneg
analysis.asymptotics
src/analysis/asymptotics/asymptotics.lean
[ "analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum", "analysis.normed_space.basic", "topology.algebra.order.liminf_limsup", "topology.local_homeomorph" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83