statement
stringlengths
1
2.88k
proof
stringlengths
0
13.9k
type
stringclasses
10 values
symbolic_name
stringlengths
1
131
library
stringclasses
417 values
filename
stringlengths
17
80
imports
listlengths
0
16
deps
listlengths
0
64
docstring
stringlengths
0
10.2k
source_url
stringclasses
1 value
commit
stringclasses
1 value
Union_union_compl_to_subordinate_boxes (π₁ : tagged_prepartition I) (π₂ : prepartition I) (hU : π₂.Union = I \ π₁.Union) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) : (π₁.union_compl_to_subordinate π₂ hU r).Union = I
(is_partition_union_compl_to_subordinate _ _ _ _).Union_eq
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.Union_union_compl_to_subordinate_boxes
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/subbox_induction.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.box.subbox_induction", "analysis.box_integral.partition.tagged" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
distortion_union_compl_to_subordinate (π₁ : tagged_prepartition I) (π₂ : prepartition I) (hU : π₂.Union = I \ π₁.Union) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) : (π₁.union_compl_to_subordinate π₂ hU r).distortion = max π₁.distortion π₂.distortion
by simp [union_compl_to_subordinate]
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.distortion_union_compl_to_subordinate
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/subbox_induction.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.box.subbox_induction", "analysis.box_integral.partition.tagged" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tagged_prepartition (I : box ι) extends prepartition I
(tag : box ι → ι → ℝ) (tag_mem_Icc : ∀ J, tag J ∈ I.Icc)
structure
box_integral.tagged_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
A tagged prepartition is a prepartition enriched with a tagged point for each box of the prepartition. For simiplicity we require that `tag` is defined for all boxes in `ι → ℝ` but we will use onle the values of `tag` on the boxes of the partition.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mem_to_prepartition {π : tagged_prepartition I} : J ∈ π.to_prepartition ↔ J ∈ π
iff.rfl
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.mem_to_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mem_mk (π : prepartition I) (f h) : J ∈ mk π f h ↔ J ∈ π
iff.rfl
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.mem_mk
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Union : set (ι → ℝ)
π.to_prepartition.Union
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.Union
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
Union of all boxes of a tagged prepartition.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Union_mk (π : prepartition I) (f h) : (mk π f h).Union = π.Union
rfl
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.Union_mk
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Union_to_prepartition : π.to_prepartition.Union = π.Union
rfl
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.Union_to_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_partition
π.to_prepartition.is_partition
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_partition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
A tagged prepartition is a partition if it covers the whole box.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_partition_iff_Union_eq : is_partition π ↔ π.Union = I
prepartition.is_partition_iff_Union_eq
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_partition_iff_Union_eq
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
filter (p : box ι → Prop) : tagged_prepartition I
⟨π.1.filter p, π.2, π.3⟩
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.filter
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "filter" ]
The tagged partition made of boxes of `π` that satisfy predicate `p`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mem_filter {p : box ι → Prop} : J ∈ π.filter p ↔ J ∈ π ∧ p J
finset.mem_filter
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.mem_filter
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "finset.mem_filter" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Union_filter_not (π : tagged_prepartition I) (p : box ι → Prop) : (π.filter (λ J, ¬p J)).Union = π.Union \ (π.filter p).Union
π.to_prepartition.Union_filter_not p
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.Union_filter_not
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
bUnion_tagged (π : prepartition I) (πi : Π J, tagged_prepartition J) : tagged_prepartition I
{ to_prepartition := π.bUnion (λ J, (πi J).to_prepartition), tag := λ J, (πi (π.bUnion_index (λ J, (πi J).to_prepartition) J)).tag J, tag_mem_Icc := λ J, box.le_iff_Icc.1 (π.bUnion_index_le _ _) ((πi _).tag_mem_Icc _) }
def
box_integral.prepartition.bUnion_tagged
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
Given a partition `π` of `I : box_integral.box ι` and a collection of tagged partitions `πi J` of all boxes `J ∈ π`, returns the tagged partition of `I` into all the boxes of `πi J` with tags coming from `(πi J).tag`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mem_bUnion_tagged (π : prepartition I) {πi : Π J, tagged_prepartition J} : J ∈ π.bUnion_tagged πi ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, J ∈ πi J'
π.mem_bUnion
lemma
box_integral.prepartition.mem_bUnion_tagged
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
tag_bUnion_tagged (π : prepartition I) {πi : Π J, tagged_prepartition J} (hJ : J ∈ π) {J'} (hJ' : J' ∈ πi J) : (π.bUnion_tagged πi).tag J' = (πi J).tag J'
begin have : J' ∈ π.bUnion_tagged πi, from π.mem_bUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, hJ'⟩, obtain rfl := π.bUnion_index_of_mem hJ hJ', refl end
lemma
box_integral.prepartition.tag_bUnion_tagged
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Union_bUnion_tagged (π : prepartition I) (πi : Π J, tagged_prepartition J) : (π.bUnion_tagged πi).Union = ⋃ J ∈ π, (πi J).Union
Union_bUnion _ _
lemma
box_integral.prepartition.Union_bUnion_tagged
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
forall_bUnion_tagged (p : (ι → ℝ) → box ι → Prop) (π : prepartition I) (πi : Π J, tagged_prepartition J) : (∀ J ∈ π.bUnion_tagged πi, p ((π.bUnion_tagged πi).tag J) J) ↔ ∀ (J ∈ π) (J' ∈ πi J), p ((πi J).tag J') J'
begin simp only [bex_imp_distrib, mem_bUnion_tagged], refine ⟨λ H J hJ J' hJ', _, λ H J' J hJ hJ', _⟩, { rw ← π.tag_bUnion_tagged hJ hJ', exact H J' J hJ hJ' }, { rw π.tag_bUnion_tagged hJ hJ', exact H J hJ J' hJ' } end
lemma
box_integral.prepartition.forall_bUnion_tagged
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "bex_imp_distrib" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_partition.bUnion_tagged {π : prepartition I} (h : is_partition π) {πi : Π J, tagged_prepartition J} (hi : ∀ J ∈ π, (πi J).is_partition) : (π.bUnion_tagged πi).is_partition
h.bUnion hi
lemma
box_integral.prepartition.is_partition.bUnion_tagged
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
bUnion_prepartition (π : tagged_prepartition I) (πi : Π J, prepartition J) : tagged_prepartition I
{ to_prepartition := π.to_prepartition.bUnion πi, tag := λ J, π.tag (π.to_prepartition.bUnion_index πi J), tag_mem_Icc := λ J, π.tag_mem_Icc _ }
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.bUnion_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
Given a tagged partition `π` of `I` and a (not tagged) partition `πi J hJ` of each `J ∈ π`, returns the tagged partition of `I` into all the boxes of all `πi J hJ`. The tag of a box `J` is defined to be the `π.tag` of the box of the partition `π` that includes `J`. Note that usually the result is not a Henstock partit...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_partition.bUnion_prepartition {π : tagged_prepartition I} (h : is_partition π) {πi : Π J, prepartition J} (hi : ∀ J ∈ π, (πi J).is_partition) : (π.bUnion_prepartition πi).is_partition
h.bUnion hi
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_partition.bUnion_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
inf_prepartition (π : tagged_prepartition I) (π' : prepartition I) : tagged_prepartition I
π.bUnion_prepartition $ λ J, π'.restrict J
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.inf_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
Given two partitions `π₁` and `π₁`, one of them tagged and the other is not, returns the tagged partition with `to_partition = π₁.to_partition ⊓ π₂` and tags coming from `π₁`. Note that usually the result is not a Henstock partition.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
inf_prepartition_to_prepartition (π : tagged_prepartition I) (π' : prepartition I) : (π.inf_prepartition π').to_prepartition = π.to_prepartition ⊓ π'
rfl
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.inf_prepartition_to_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mem_inf_prepartition_comm : J ∈ π₁.inf_prepartition π₂.to_prepartition ↔ J ∈ π₂.inf_prepartition π₁.to_prepartition
by simp only [← mem_to_prepartition, inf_prepartition_to_prepartition, inf_comm]
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.mem_inf_prepartition_comm
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "inf_comm" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_partition.inf_prepartition (h₁ : π₁.is_partition) {π₂ : prepartition I} (h₂ : π₂.is_partition) : (π₁.inf_prepartition π₂).is_partition
h₁.inf h₂
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_partition.inf_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_Henstock (π : tagged_prepartition I) : Prop
∀ J ∈ π, π.tag J ∈ J.Icc
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_Henstock
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
A tagged partition is said to be a Henstock partition if for each `J ∈ π`, the tag of `J` belongs to `J.Icc`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_Henstock_bUnion_tagged {π : prepartition I} {πi : Π J, tagged_prepartition J} : is_Henstock (π.bUnion_tagged πi) ↔ ∀ J ∈ π, (πi J).is_Henstock
π.forall_bUnion_tagged (λ x J, x ∈ J.Icc) πi
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_Henstock_bUnion_tagged
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_Henstock.card_filter_tag_eq_le [fintype ι] (h : π.is_Henstock) (x : ι → ℝ) : (π.boxes.filter (λ J, π.tag J = x)).card ≤ 2 ^ fintype.card ι
calc (π.boxes.filter (λ J, π.tag J = x)).card ≤ (π.boxes.filter (λ J : box ι, x ∈ J.Icc)).card : begin refine finset.card_le_of_subset (λ J hJ, _), rw finset.mem_filter at hJ ⊢, rcases hJ with ⟨hJ, rfl⟩, exact ⟨hJ, h J hJ⟩ end ... ≤ 2 ^ fintype.card ι : π.to_prepartition.card_filter_mem_Icc_le x
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_Henstock.card_filter_tag_eq_le
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "finset.card_le_of_subset", "finset.mem_filter", "fintype", "fintype.card" ]
In a Henstock prepartition, there are at most `2 ^ fintype.card ι` boxes with a given tag.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_subordinate [fintype ι] (π : tagged_prepartition I) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) : Prop
∀ J ∈ π, (J : _).Icc ⊆ closed_ball (π.tag J) (r $ π.tag J)
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_subordinate
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
A tagged partition `π` is subordinate to `r : (ι → ℝ) → ℝ` if each box `J ∈ π` is included in the closed ball with center `π.tag J` and radius `r (π.tag J)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_subordinate_bUnion_tagged [fintype ι] {π : prepartition I} {πi : Π J, tagged_prepartition J} : is_subordinate (π.bUnion_tagged πi) r ↔ ∀ J ∈ π, (πi J).is_subordinate r
π.forall_bUnion_tagged (λ x J, J.Icc ⊆ closed_ball x (r x)) πi
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_subordinate_bUnion_tagged
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_subordinate.bUnion_prepartition [fintype ι] (h : is_subordinate π r) (πi : Π J, prepartition J) : is_subordinate (π.bUnion_prepartition πi) r
λ J hJ, subset.trans (box.le_iff_Icc.1 $ π.to_prepartition.le_bUnion_index hJ) $ h _ $ π.to_prepartition.bUnion_index_mem hJ
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_subordinate.bUnion_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_subordinate.inf_prepartition [fintype ι] (h : is_subordinate π r) (π' : prepartition I) : is_subordinate (π.inf_prepartition π') r
h.bUnion_prepartition _
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_subordinate.inf_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_subordinate.mono' [fintype ι] {π : tagged_prepartition I} (hr₁ : π.is_subordinate r₁) (h : ∀ J ∈ π, r₁ (π.tag J) ≤ r₂ (π.tag J)) : π.is_subordinate r₂
λ J hJ x hx, closed_ball_subset_closed_ball (h _ hJ) (hr₁ _ hJ hx)
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_subordinate.mono'
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_subordinate.mono [fintype ι] {π : tagged_prepartition I} (hr₁ : π.is_subordinate r₁) (h : ∀ x ∈ I.Icc, r₁ x ≤ r₂ x) : π.is_subordinate r₂
hr₁.mono' $ λ J _, h _ $ π.tag_mem_Icc J
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_subordinate.mono
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_subordinate.diam_le [fintype ι] {π : tagged_prepartition I} (h : π.is_subordinate r) (hJ : J ∈ π.boxes) : diam J.Icc ≤ 2 * r (π.tag J)
calc diam J.Icc ≤ diam (closed_ball (π.tag J) (r $ π.tag J)) : diam_mono (h J hJ) bounded_closed_ball ... ≤ 2 * r (π.tag J) : diam_closed_ball (le_of_lt (r _).2)
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_subordinate.diam_le
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
single (I J : box ι) (hJ : J ≤ I) (x : ι → ℝ) (h : x ∈ I.Icc) : tagged_prepartition I
⟨prepartition.single I J hJ, λ J, x, λ J, h⟩
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.single
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
Tagged prepartition with single box and prescribed tag.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mem_single {J'} (hJ : J ≤ I) (h : x ∈ I.Icc) : J' ∈ single I J hJ x h ↔ J' = J
finset.mem_singleton
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.mem_single
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "finset.mem_singleton" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_partition_single_iff (hJ : J ≤ I) (h : x ∈ I.Icc) : (single I J hJ x h).is_partition ↔ J = I
prepartition.is_partition_single_iff hJ
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_partition_single_iff
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_partition_single (h : x ∈ I.Icc) : (single I I le_rfl x h).is_partition
prepartition.is_partition_top I
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_partition_single
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "le_rfl" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
forall_mem_single (p : (ι → ℝ) → (box ι) → Prop) (hJ : J ≤ I) (h : x ∈ I.Icc) : (∀ J' ∈ single I J hJ x h, p ((single I J hJ x h).tag J') J') ↔ p x J
by simp
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.forall_mem_single
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_Henstock_single_iff (hJ : J ≤ I) (h : x ∈ I.Icc) : is_Henstock (single I J hJ x h) ↔ x ∈ J.Icc
forall_mem_single (λ x J, x ∈ J.Icc) hJ h
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_Henstock_single_iff
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_Henstock_single (h : x ∈ I.Icc) : is_Henstock (single I I le_rfl x h)
(is_Henstock_single_iff (le_refl I) h).2 h
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_Henstock_single
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "le_rfl" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_subordinate_single [fintype ι] (hJ : J ≤ I) (h : x ∈ I.Icc) : is_subordinate (single I J hJ x h) r ↔ J.Icc ⊆ closed_ball x (r x)
forall_mem_single (λ x J, J.Icc ⊆ closed_ball x (r x)) hJ h
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_subordinate_single
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "fintype" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Union_single (hJ : J ≤ I) (h : x ∈ I.Icc) : (single I J hJ x h).Union = J
prepartition.Union_single hJ
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.Union_single
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
disj_union (π₁ π₂ : tagged_prepartition I) (h : disjoint π₁.Union π₂.Union) : tagged_prepartition I
{ to_prepartition := π₁.to_prepartition.disj_union π₂.to_prepartition h, tag := π₁.boxes.piecewise π₁.tag π₂.tag, tag_mem_Icc := λ J, by { dunfold finset.piecewise, split_ifs, exacts [π₁.tag_mem_Icc J, π₂.tag_mem_Icc J] } }
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.disj_union
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "disjoint", "finset.piecewise" ]
Union of two tagged prepartitions with disjoint unions of boxes.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
disj_union_boxes (h : disjoint π₁.Union π₂.Union) : (π₁.disj_union π₂ h).boxes = π₁.boxes ∪ π₂.boxes
rfl
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.disj_union_boxes
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "disjoint" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
mem_disj_union (h : disjoint π₁.Union π₂.Union) : J ∈ π₁.disj_union π₂ h ↔ J ∈ π₁ ∨ J ∈ π₂
finset.mem_union
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.mem_disj_union
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "disjoint", "finset.mem_union" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Union_disj_union (h : disjoint π₁.Union π₂.Union) : (π₁.disj_union π₂ h).Union = π₁.Union ∪ π₂.Union
prepartition.Union_disj_union _
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.Union_disj_union
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "disjoint" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
disj_union_tag_of_mem_left (h : disjoint π₁.Union π₂.Union) (hJ : J ∈ π₁) : (π₁.disj_union π₂ h).tag J = π₁.tag J
dif_pos hJ
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.disj_union_tag_of_mem_left
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "disjoint" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
disj_union_tag_of_mem_right (h : disjoint π₁.Union π₂.Union) (hJ : J ∈ π₂) : (π₁.disj_union π₂ h).tag J = π₂.tag J
dif_neg $ λ h₁, h.le_bot ⟨π₁.subset_Union h₁ J.upper_mem, π₂.subset_Union hJ J.upper_mem⟩
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.disj_union_tag_of_mem_right
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "disjoint" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_subordinate.disj_union [fintype ι] (h₁ : is_subordinate π₁ r) (h₂ : is_subordinate π₂ r) (h : disjoint π₁.Union π₂.Union) : is_subordinate (π₁.disj_union π₂ h) r
begin refine λ J hJ, (finset.mem_union.1 hJ).elim (λ hJ, _) (λ hJ, _), { rw disj_union_tag_of_mem_left _ hJ, exact h₁ _ hJ }, { rw disj_union_tag_of_mem_right _ hJ, exact h₂ _ hJ } end
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_subordinate.disj_union
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "disjoint", "fintype" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_Henstock.disj_union (h₁ : is_Henstock π₁) (h₂ : is_Henstock π₂) (h : disjoint π₁.Union π₂.Union) : is_Henstock (π₁.disj_union π₂ h)
begin refine λ J hJ, (finset.mem_union.1 hJ).elim (λ hJ, _) (λ hJ, _), { rw disj_union_tag_of_mem_left _ hJ, exact h₁ _ hJ }, { rw disj_union_tag_of_mem_right _ hJ, exact h₂ _ hJ } end
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.is_Henstock.disj_union
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[ "disjoint" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
embed_box (I J : box ι) (h : I ≤ J) : tagged_prepartition I ↪ tagged_prepartition J
{ to_fun := λ π, { le_of_mem' := λ J' hJ', (π.le_of_mem' J' hJ').trans h, tag_mem_Icc := λ J, box.le_iff_Icc.1 h (π.tag_mem_Icc J), .. π }, inj' := by { rintro ⟨⟨b₁, h₁le, h₁d⟩, t₁, ht₁⟩ ⟨⟨b₂, h₂le, h₂d⟩, t₂, ht₂⟩ H, simpa using H } }
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.embed_box
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
If `I ≤ J`, then every tagged prepartition of `I` is a tagged prepartition of `J`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
distortion : ℝ≥0
π.to_prepartition.distortion
def
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.distortion
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
The distortion of a tagged prepartition is the maximum of distortions of its boxes.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
_root_.box_integral.prepartition.distortion_bUnion_tagged (π : prepartition I) (πi : Π J, tagged_prepartition J) : (π.bUnion_tagged πi).distortion = π.boxes.sup (λ J, (πi J).distortion)
sup_bUnion _ _
lemma
box_integral.prepartition.distortion_bUnion_tagged
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
distortion_bUnion_prepartition (π : tagged_prepartition I) (πi : Π J, prepartition J) : (π.bUnion_prepartition πi).distortion = π.boxes.sup (λ J, (πi J).distortion)
sup_bUnion _ _
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.distortion_bUnion_prepartition
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
distortion_single (hJ : J ≤ I) (h : x ∈ I.Icc) : distortion (single I J hJ x h) = J.distortion
sup_singleton
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.distortion_single
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
distortion_filter_le (p : box ι → Prop) : (π.filter p).distortion ≤ π.distortion
sup_mono (filter_subset _ _)
lemma
box_integral.tagged_prepartition.distortion_filter_le
analysis.box_integral.partition
src/analysis/box_integral/partition/tagged.lean
[ "analysis.box_integral.partition.basic" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
cont_diff {n : ℕ∞} (f : V →A[𝕜] W) : cont_diff 𝕜 n f
begin rw f.decomp, apply f.cont_linear.cont_diff.add, simp only, exact cont_diff_const, end
lemma
continuous_affine_map.cont_diff
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/affine_map.lean
[ "analysis.normed_space.continuous_affine_map", "analysis.calculus.cont_diff" ]
[ "cont_diff", "cont_diff_const" ]
A continuous affine map between normed vector spaces is smooth.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
exists_smooth_tsupport_subset {s : set E} {x : E} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ (f : E → ℝ), tsupport f ⊆ s ∧ has_compact_support f ∧ cont_diff ℝ ⊤ f ∧ range f ⊆ Icc 0 1 ∧ f x = 1
begin obtain ⟨d, d_pos, hd⟩ : ∃ (d : ℝ) (hr : 0 < d), euclidean.closed_ball x d ⊆ s, from euclidean.nhds_basis_closed_ball.mem_iff.1 hs, let c : cont_diff_bump (to_euclidean x) := { r := d/2, R := d, r_pos := half_pos d_pos, r_lt_R := half_lt_self d_pos }, let f : E → ℝ := c ∘ to_euclidean, ha...
theorem
exists_smooth_tsupport_subset
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "closure_mono", "cont_diff", "cont_diff_bump", "continuous_linear_equiv.cont_diff", "euclidean.ball", "euclidean.ball_subset_closed_ball", "euclidean.closed_ball", "euclidean.closure_ball", "euclidean.is_closed_closed_ball", "function.support", "half_pos", "is_closed.closure_subset_iff", "is...
If a set `s` is a neighborhood of `x`, then there exists a smooth function `f` taking values in `[0, 1]`, supported in `s` and with `f x = 1`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
is_open.exists_smooth_support_eq {s : set E} (hs : is_open s) : ∃ (f : E → ℝ), f.support = s ∧ cont_diff ℝ ⊤ f ∧ set.range f ⊆ set.Icc 0 1
begin /- For any given point `x` in `s`, one can construct a smooth function with support in `s` and nonzero at `x`. By second-countability, it follows that we may cover `s` with the supports of countably many such functions, say `g i`. Then `∑ i, r i • g i` will be the desired function if `r i` is a sequence o...
theorem
is_open.exists_smooth_support_eq
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "algebra.id.smul_eq_mul", "bdd_above", "cont_diff", "cont_diff_const", "cont_diff_tsum_of_eventually", "exists_smooth_tsupport_subset", "filter.eventually_at_top", "finset.le_max'", "finset.mem_image_of_mem", "finset.mem_range", "finset.range", "ge_iff_le", "has_sum", "is_open", "iterate...
Given an open set `s` in a finite-dimensional real normed vector space, there exists a smooth function with values in `[0, 1]` whose support is exactly `s`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
φ : E → ℝ
(closed_ball (0 : E) 1).indicator (λ y, (1 : ℝ))
def
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.φ
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
An auxiliary function to construct partitions of unity on finite-dimensional real vector spaces. It is the characteristic function of the closed unit ball.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
u_exists : ∃ u : E → ℝ, cont_diff ℝ ⊤ u ∧ (∀ x, u x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) ∧ (support u = ball 0 1) ∧ (∀ x, u (-x) = u x)
begin have A : is_open (ball (0 : E) 1), from is_open_ball, obtain ⟨f, f_support, f_smooth, f_range⟩ : ∃ (f : E → ℝ), f.support = ball (0 : E) 1 ∧ cont_diff ℝ ⊤ f ∧ set.range f ⊆ set.Icc 0 1, from A.exists_smooth_support_eq, have B : ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := λ x, f_range (mem_range_self x), refine ⟨λ...
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.u_exists
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "cont_diff", "cont_diff_neg", "is_open", "not_not", "set.Icc", "set.range", "zero_div" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
u (x : E) : ℝ
classical.some (u_exists E) x
def
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.u
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
An auxiliary function to construct partitions of unity on finite-dimensional real vector spaces, which is smooth, symmetric, and with support equal to the unit ball.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
u_smooth : cont_diff ℝ ⊤ (u : E → ℝ)
(classical.some_spec (u_exists E)).1
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.u_smooth
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "cont_diff" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
u_continuous : continuous (u : E → ℝ)
(u_smooth E).continuous
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.u_continuous
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "continuous" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
u_support : support (u : E → ℝ) = ball 0 1
(classical.some_spec (u_exists E)).2.2.1
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.u_support
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
u_compact_support : has_compact_support (u : E → ℝ)
begin rw [has_compact_support_def, u_support, closure_ball (0 : E) one_ne_zero], exact is_compact_closed_ball _ _, end
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.u_compact_support
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "closure_ball", "one_ne_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
u_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ u x
((classical.some_spec (u_exists E)).2.1 x).1
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.u_nonneg
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
u_le_one (x : E) : u x ≤ 1
((classical.some_spec (u_exists E)).2.1 x).2
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.u_le_one
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
u_neg (x : E) : u (-x) = u x
(classical.some_spec (u_exists E)).2.2.2 x
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.u_neg
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
u_int_pos : 0 < ∫ (x : E), u x ∂μ
begin refine (integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg u_nonneg _).mpr _, { exact (u_continuous E).integrable_of_has_compact_support (u_compact_support E) }, { rw u_support, exact measure_ball_pos _ _ zero_lt_one } end
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.u_int_pos
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "zero_lt_one" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
W (D : ℝ) (x : E) : ℝ
((∫ (x : E), u x ∂μ) * |D|^(finrank ℝ E))⁻¹ • u (D⁻¹ • x)
def
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.W
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
An auxiliary function to construct partitions of unity on finite-dimensional real vector spaces, which is smooth, symmetric, with support equal to the ball of radius `D` and integral `1`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
W_def (D : ℝ) : (W D : E → ℝ) = λ x, ((∫ (x : E), u x ∂μ) * |D|^(finrank ℝ E))⁻¹ • u (D⁻¹ • x)
by { ext1 x, refl }
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.W_def
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
W_nonneg (D : ℝ) (x : E) : 0 ≤ W D x
begin apply mul_nonneg _ (u_nonneg _), apply inv_nonneg.2, apply mul_nonneg (u_int_pos E).le, apply pow_nonneg (abs_nonneg D) end
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.W_nonneg
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "abs_nonneg", "pow_nonneg" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
W_mul_φ_nonneg (D : ℝ) (x y : E) : 0 ≤ W D y * φ (x - y)
mul_nonneg (W_nonneg D y) (indicator_nonneg (by simp only [zero_le_one, implies_true_iff]) _)
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.W_mul_φ_nonneg
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "zero_le_one" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
W_integral {D : ℝ} (Dpos : 0 < D) : ∫ (x : E), W D x ∂μ = 1
begin simp_rw [W, integral_smul], rw [integral_comp_inv_smul_of_nonneg μ (u : E → ℝ) Dpos.le, abs_of_nonneg Dpos.le, mul_comm], field_simp [Dpos.ne', (u_int_pos E).ne'], end
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.W_integral
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "abs_of_nonneg", "mul_comm" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
W_support {D : ℝ} (Dpos : 0 < D) : support (W D : E → ℝ) = ball 0 D
begin have B : D • ball (0 : E) 1 = ball 0 D, by rw [smul_unit_ball Dpos.ne', real.norm_of_nonneg Dpos.le], have C : D ^ finrank ℝ E ≠ 0, from pow_ne_zero _ Dpos.ne', simp only [W_def, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, support_mul, support_inv, univ_inter, support_comp_inv_smul₀ Dpos.ne', u_support, B, support_cons...
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.W_support
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "abs_of_nonneg", "algebra.id.smul_eq_mul", "pow_ne_zero", "real.norm_of_nonneg", "smul_unit_ball", "support_comp_inv_smul₀" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
W_compact_support {D : ℝ} (Dpos : 0 < D) : has_compact_support (W D : E → ℝ)
begin rw [has_compact_support_def, W_support E Dpos, closure_ball (0 : E) Dpos.ne'], exact is_compact_closed_ball _ _, end
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.W_compact_support
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "closure_ball" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Y (D : ℝ) : E → ℝ
W D ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] φ
def
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.Y
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
An auxiliary function to construct partitions of unity on finite-dimensional real vector spaces. It is the convolution between a smooth function of integral `1` supported in the ball of radius `D`, with the indicator function of the closed unit ball. Therefore, it is smooth, equal to `1` on the ball of radius `1 - D`, ...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Y_neg (D : ℝ) (x : E) : Y D (-x) = Y D x
begin apply convolution_neg_of_neg_eq, { apply eventually_of_forall (λ x, _), simp only [W_def, u_neg, smul_neg, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, eq_self_iff_true, true_or], }, { apply eventually_of_forall (λ x, _), simp only [φ, indicator, mem_closed_ball_zero_iff, norm_neg] }, end
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.Y_neg
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "algebra.id.smul_eq_mul", "convolution_neg_of_neg_eq", "mul_eq_mul_left_iff", "smul_neg" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Y_eq_one_of_mem_closed_ball {D : ℝ} {x : E} (Dpos : 0 < D) (hx : x ∈ closed_ball (0 : E) (1 - D)) : Y D x = 1
begin change (W D ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] φ) x = 1, have B : ∀ (y : E), y ∈ ball x D → φ y = 1, { have C : ball x D ⊆ ball 0 1, { apply ball_subset_ball', simp only [mem_closed_ball] at hx, linarith only [hx] }, assume y hy, simp only [φ, indicator, mem_closed_ball, ite_eq_left_iff, not_le, zero_n...
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.Y_eq_one_of_mem_closed_ball
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "algebra.id.smul_eq_mul", "convolution_eq_right'", "ite_eq_left_iff", "one_mul", "zero_ne_one" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Y_eq_zero_of_not_mem_ball {D : ℝ} {x : E} (Dpos : 0 < D) (hx : x ∉ ball (0 : E) (1 + D)) : Y D x = 0
begin change (W D ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] φ) x = 0, have B : ∀ y, y ∈ ball x D → φ y = 0, { assume y hy, simp only [φ, indicator, mem_closed_ball_zero_iff, ite_eq_right_iff, one_ne_zero], assume h'y, have C : ball y D ⊆ ball 0 (1+D), { apply ball_subset_ball', rw ← dist_zero_right at h'y, lin...
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.Y_eq_zero_of_not_mem_ball
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "algebra.id.smul_eq_mul", "convolution_eq_right'", "ite_eq_right_iff", "mul_zero", "one_ne_zero" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Y_nonneg (D : ℝ) (x : E) : 0 ≤ Y D x
integral_nonneg (W_mul_φ_nonneg D x)
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.Y_nonneg
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Y_le_one {D : ℝ} (x : E) (Dpos : 0 < D) : Y D x ≤ 1
begin have A : (W D ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] φ) x ≤ (W D ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] 1) x, { apply convolution_mono_right_of_nonneg _ (W_nonneg D) (indicator_le_self' (λ x hx, zero_le_one)) (λ x, zero_le_one), refine (has_compact_support.convolution_exists_left _ (W_compact_support E Dpos) _ (locally_integrable_const (1...
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.Y_le_one
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "algebra.id.smul_eq_mul", "continuous_linear_map.map_smul", "convolution", "convolution_mono_right_of_nonneg", "has_compact_support.convolution_exists_left", "mul_inv_rev", "mul_one", "pi.smul_apply", "zero_le_one" ]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Y_pos_of_mem_ball {D : ℝ} {x : E} (Dpos : 0 < D) (D_lt_one : D < 1) (hx : x ∈ ball (0 : E) (1 + D)) : 0 < Y D x
begin simp only [mem_ball_zero_iff] at hx, refine (integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg (W_mul_φ_nonneg D x) _).2 _, { have F_comp : has_compact_support (W D), from W_compact_support E Dpos, have B : locally_integrable (φ : E → ℝ) μ, from (locally_integrable_const _).indicator measurable_set_closed_...
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.Y_pos_of_mem_ball
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "abs_div", "abs_of_nonneg", "add_tsub_cancel_right", "continuous", "div_le_iff", "div_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg", "div_pos", "exists_prop", "has_compact_support.convolution_exists_left", "measurable_set_closed_ball", "mul_eq_zero", "mul_one", "norm_smul", "not_forall", "one_div", "one...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Y_smooth : cont_diff_on ℝ ⊤ (uncurry Y) ((Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1) ×ˢ (univ : set E))
begin have hs : is_open (Ioo (0 : ℝ) (1 : ℝ)), from is_open_Ioo, have hk : is_compact (closed_ball (0 : E) 1), from proper_space.is_compact_closed_ball _ _, refine cont_diff_on_convolution_left_with_param (lsmul ℝ ℝ) hs hk _ _ _, { rintros p x hp hx, simp only [W, mul_inv_rev, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_eq...
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.Y_smooth
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[ "abs_inv", "abs_of_nonneg", "abs_pos_of_pos", "algebra.id.smul_eq_mul", "cont_diff_on", "cont_diff_on.mul", "cont_diff_on.norm", "cont_diff_on.pow", "cont_diff_on.smul", "cont_diff_on_convolution_left_with_param", "cont_diff_on_fst", "cont_diff_on_snd", "div_eq_inv_mul", "div_lt_one", "i...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
Y_support {D : ℝ} (Dpos : 0 < D) (D_lt_one : D < 1) : support (Y D : E → ℝ) = ball (0 : E) (1 + D)
support_eq_iff.2 ⟨λ x hx, (Y_pos_of_mem_ball Dpos D_lt_one hx).ne', λ x hx, Y_eq_zero_of_not_mem_ball Dpos hx⟩
lemma
exists_cont_diff_bump_base.Y_support
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_findim.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.series", "analysis.convolution", "analysis.inner_product_space.euclidean_dist", "measure_theory.measure.haar.normed_space", "data.set.pointwise.support" ]
[]
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
exp_neg_inv_glue (x : ℝ) : ℝ
if x ≤ 0 then 0 else exp (-x⁻¹)
def
exp_neg_inv_glue
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "exp" ]
`exp_neg_inv_glue` is the real function given by `x ↦ exp (-1/x)` for `x > 0` and `0` for `x ≤ 0`. It is a basic building block to construct smooth partitions of unity. Its main property is that it vanishes for `x ≤ 0`, it is positive for `x > 0`, and the junction between the two behaviors is flat enough to retain smoo...
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
P_aux : ℕ → ℝ[X]
| 0 := 1 | (n+1) := X^2 * (P_aux n).derivative + (1 - C ↑(2 * n) * X) * (P_aux n)
def
exp_neg_inv_glue.P_aux
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[]
Our goal is to prove that `exp_neg_inv_glue` is `C^∞`. For this, we compute its successive derivatives for `x > 0`. The `n`-th derivative is of the form `P_aux n (x) exp(-1/x) / x^(2 n)`, where `P_aux n` is computed inductively.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
f_aux (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ℝ
if x ≤ 0 then 0 else (P_aux n).eval x * exp (-x⁻¹) / x^(2 * n)
def
exp_neg_inv_glue.f_aux
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "exp" ]
Formula for the `n`-th derivative of `exp_neg_inv_glue`, as an auxiliary function `f_aux`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
f_aux_zero_eq : f_aux 0 = exp_neg_inv_glue
begin ext x, by_cases h : x ≤ 0, { simp [exp_neg_inv_glue, f_aux, h] }, { simp [h, exp_neg_inv_glue, f_aux, ne_of_gt (not_le.1 h), P_aux] } end
lemma
exp_neg_inv_glue.f_aux_zero_eq
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "exp_neg_inv_glue" ]
The `0`-th auxiliary function `f_aux 0` coincides with `exp_neg_inv_glue`, by definition.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
f_aux_deriv (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : has_deriv_at (λx, (P_aux n).eval x * exp (-x⁻¹) / x^(2 * n)) ((P_aux (n+1)).eval x * exp (-x⁻¹) / x^(2 * (n + 1))) x
begin simp only [P_aux, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_pow, eval_X, eval_C, eval_one], convert (((P_aux n).has_deriv_at x).mul (((has_deriv_at_exp _).comp x (has_deriv_at_inv hx).neg))).div (has_deriv_at_pow (2 * n) x) (pow_ne_zero _ hx) using 1, rw div_eq_div_iff, { have := pow_n...
lemma
exp_neg_inv_glue.f_aux_deriv
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "div_eq_div_iff", "exp", "has_deriv_at", "has_deriv_at_exp", "has_deriv_at_inv", "has_deriv_at_pow", "mul_one", "mul_zero", "nat.cast_zero", "pow_ne_zero", "ring" ]
For positive values, the derivative of the `n`-th auxiliary function `f_aux n` (given in this statement in unfolded form) is the `n+1`-th auxiliary function, since the polynomial `P_aux (n+1)` was chosen precisely to ensure this.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
f_aux_deriv_pos (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 < x) : has_deriv_at (f_aux n) ((P_aux (n+1)).eval x * exp (-x⁻¹) / x^(2 * (n + 1))) x
begin apply (f_aux_deriv n x (ne_of_gt hx)).congr_of_eventually_eq, filter_upwards [lt_mem_nhds hx] with _ hy, simp [f_aux, hy.not_le] end
lemma
exp_neg_inv_glue.f_aux_deriv_pos
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "exp", "has_deriv_at", "lt_mem_nhds" ]
For positive values, the derivative of the `n`-th auxiliary function `f_aux n` is the `n+1`-th auxiliary function.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
f_aux_limit (n : ℕ) : tendsto (λx, (P_aux n).eval x * exp (-x⁻¹) / x^(2 * n)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0)
begin have A : tendsto (λx, (P_aux n).eval x) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 ((P_aux n).eval 0)) := (P_aux n).continuous_within_at, have B : tendsto (λx, exp (-x⁻¹) / x^(2 * n)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0), { convert (tendsto_pow_mul_exp_neg_at_top_nhds_0 (2 * n)).comp tendsto_inv_zero_at_top, ext x, field_simp }, convert A.mul ...
lemma
exp_neg_inv_glue.f_aux_limit
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "continuous_within_at", "exp", "mul_div_assoc", "tendsto_inv_zero_at_top" ]
To get differentiability at `0` of the auxiliary functions, we need to know that their limit is `0`, to be able to apply general differentiability extension theorems. This limit is checked in this lemma.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
f_aux_deriv_zero (n : ℕ) : has_deriv_at (f_aux n) 0 0
begin -- we check separately differentiability on the left and on the right have A : has_deriv_within_at (f_aux n) (0 : ℝ) (Iic 0) 0, { apply (has_deriv_at_const (0 : ℝ) (0 : ℝ)).has_deriv_within_at.congr, { assume y hy, simp at hy, simp [f_aux, hy] }, { simp [f_aux, le_refl] } }, have B : h...
lemma
exp_neg_inv_glue.f_aux_deriv_zero
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "continuous_within_at", "deriv", "differentiable_at.differentiable_within_at", "differentiable_on", "has_deriv_at", "has_deriv_at_const", "has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv", "has_deriv_within_at", "has_deriv_within_at.congr", "self_mem_nhds_within" ]
Deduce from the limiting behavior at `0` of its derivative and general differentiability extension theorems that the auxiliary function `f_aux n` is differentiable at `0`, with derivative `0`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
f_aux_has_deriv_at (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : has_deriv_at (f_aux n) (f_aux (n+1) x) x
begin -- check separately the result for `x < 0`, where it is trivial, for `x > 0`, where it is done -- in `f_aux_deriv_pos`, and for `x = 0`, done in -- `f_aux_deriv_zero`. rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with hx|hx|hx, { have : f_aux (n+1) x = 0, by simp [f_aux, le_of_lt hx], rw this, apply (has_deriv_at_c...
lemma
exp_neg_inv_glue.f_aux_has_deriv_at
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "exp", "gt_mem_nhds", "has_deriv_at", "has_deriv_at_const" ]
At every point, the auxiliary function `f_aux n` has a derivative which is equal to `f_aux (n+1)`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
f_aux_iterated_deriv (n : ℕ) : iterated_deriv n (f_aux 0) = f_aux n
begin induction n with n IH, { simp }, { simp [iterated_deriv_succ, IH], ext x, exact (f_aux_has_deriv_at n x).deriv } end
lemma
exp_neg_inv_glue.f_aux_iterated_deriv
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "deriv", "iterated_deriv", "iterated_deriv_succ" ]
The successive derivatives of the auxiliary function `f_aux 0` are the functions `f_aux n`, by induction.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
cont_diff {n} : cont_diff ℝ n exp_neg_inv_glue
begin rw ← f_aux_zero_eq, apply cont_diff_of_differentiable_iterated_deriv (λ m hm, _), rw f_aux_iterated_deriv m, exact λ x, (f_aux_has_deriv_at m x).differentiable_at end
theorem
exp_neg_inv_glue.cont_diff
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "cont_diff", "cont_diff_of_differentiable_iterated_deriv", "differentiable_at", "exp_neg_inv_glue" ]
The function `exp_neg_inv_glue` is smooth.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83
zero_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : exp_neg_inv_glue x = 0
by simp [exp_neg_inv_glue, hx]
lemma
exp_neg_inv_glue.zero_of_nonpos
analysis.calculus
src/analysis/calculus/bump_function_inner.lean
[ "analysis.calculus.deriv.inv", "analysis.calculus.extend_deriv", "analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv", "analysis.inner_product_space.calculus", "analysis.special_functions.exp_deriv", "measure_theory.integral.set_integral" ]
[ "exp_neg_inv_glue" ]
The function `exp_neg_inv_glue` vanishes on `(-∞, 0]`.
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib
65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83