Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
statement
stringlengths
2
3.47k
proof
stringlengths
0
196k
type
stringclasses
1 value
symbolic_name
stringlengths
7
23
library
stringclasses
1 value
filename
stringlengths
12
16
imports
listlengths
0
0
deps
listlengths
0
0
docstring
stringclasses
1 value
source_url
stringclasses
1 value
commit
stringclasses
1 value
for T being Noetherian sup-Semilattice for I being Ideal of T holds ex_sup_of I, T & sup I in I
proof let T be Noetherian sup-Semilattice; let I be Ideal of T; consider a being Element of T such that A1: a in I and A2: for b being Element of T st b in I holds not a < b by Def2; A3: I is_<=_than a proof let d be Element of T; assume d in I; then a"\/"d in I by A1,WAYBEL_0:40; then A4: not a...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th1
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for A1,A2 being AdjectiveStr st the adjectives of A1 = the adjectives of A2 holds A1 is void implies A2 is void
proof let A1,A2 be AdjectiveStr such that A1: the adjectives of A1 = the adjectives of A2; assume the adjectives of A1 is empty; hence the adjectives of A2 is empty by A1; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:T2
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for A1,A2 being AdjectiveStr st the AdjectiveStr of A1 = the AdjectiveStr of A2 for a1 being adjective of A1, a2 being adjective of A2 st a1 = a2 holds non-a1 = non-a2
theorem
abcmiz_0:T3
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for a1,a2 being set st a1 <> a2 for A being AdjectiveStr st the adjectives of A = {a1,a2} & (the non-op of A).a1 = a2 & (the non-op of A).a2 = a1 holds A is non void involutive without_fixpoints
proof let a1,a2 be set such that A1: a1 <> a2; let A be AdjectiveStr such that A2: the adjectives of A = {a1,a2} and A3: (the non-op of A).a1 = a2 and A4: (the non-op of A).a2 = a1; thus the adjectives of A is non empty by A2; hereby let a be adjective of A; a = a1 or a = a2 by A2,TARSKI:def 2; henc...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th4
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for A1,A2 being AdjectiveStr st the AdjectiveStr of A1 = the AdjectiveStr of A2 holds A1 is involutive implies A2 is involutive
proof let A1,A2 be AdjectiveStr such that A1: the AdjectiveStr of A1 = the AdjectiveStr of A2; assume A2: for a being adjective of A1 holds non-non-a = a; let a be adjective of A2; reconsider b = a as adjective of A1 by A1; thus non-non-a = non-non-b by A1 .= a by A2; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th5
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for A1,A2 being AdjectiveStr st the AdjectiveStr of A1 = the AdjectiveStr of A2 holds A1 is without_fixpoints implies A2 is without_fixpoints
proof let A1,A2 be AdjectiveStr such that A1: the AdjectiveStr of A1 = the AdjectiveStr of A2; assume A2: not ex a being adjective of A1 st non-a = a; given a being adjective of A2 such that A3: non-a = a; reconsider b = a as adjective of A1 by A1; non-b = b by A1,A3; hence contradiction by A2; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th6
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T1,T2 being TA-structure st the TA-structure of T1 = the TA-structure of T2 for t1 being type of T1, t2 being type of T2 st t1 = t2 holds adjs t1 = adjs t2
theorem
abcmiz_0:T7
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T1,T2 being TA-structure st the TA-structure of T1 = the TA-structure of T2 holds T1 is consistent implies T2 is consistent
proof let T1,T2 be TA-structure such that A1: the TA-structure of T1 = the TA-structure of T2 and A2: for t being type of T1 for a being adjective of T1 st a in adjs t holds not non-a in adjs t; let t2 be type of T2, a2 be adjective of T2; reconsider a1 = a2 as adjective of T1 by A1; reconsider t1 = t2 as typ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th8
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T1,T2 being non empty TA-structure st the TA-structure of T1 = the TA-structure of T2 holds T1 is adj-structured implies T2 is adj-structured
proof let T1,T2 be non empty TA-structure such that A1: the TA-structure of T1 = the TA-structure of T2; assume the adj-map of T1 is join-preserving Function of T1, (BoolePoset the adjectives of T1) opp; then reconsider f = the adj-map of T1 as join-preserving Function of T1, ( BoolePoset the adjectives of T1...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th9
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure st T is adj-structured for t1,t2 being type of T st t1 <= t2 holds adjs t2 c= adjs t1
proof let T be reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure such that A1: for t1,t2 being type of T holds adjs(t1"\/"t2) = (adjs t1) /\ (adjs t2); let t1,t2 be type of T; assume t1 <= t2; then t1"\/"t2 = t2 by YELLOW_0:24; then adjs t2 = (adjs t1)/\(adjs t2) by A1; hence thesis by XBOOLE_1...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th10
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T1,T2 being TA-structure st the TA-structure of T1 = the TA-structure of T2 for a1 being adjective of T1, a2 being adjective of T2 st a1 = a2 holds types a1 = types a2
proof let T1,T2 be TA-structure such that A1: the TA-structure of T1 = the TA-structure of T2; let a1 be adjective of T1, a2 be adjective of T2 such that A2: a1 = a2; now thus types a1 is Subset of T2 by A1; let x be set; hereby assume x in types a1; then consider t1 being type of T1 such ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th11
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty TA-structure for a being adjective of T holds types a = {t where t is type of T: a in adjs t}
proof let T be non empty TA-structure; let a be adjective of T; set X = {t where t is type of T: a in adjs t}; X c= the carrier of T proof let x be set; assume x in X; then ex t being type of T st x = t & a in adjs t; hence thesis; end; then reconsider X as Subset of T; for x being set h...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T12
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being TA-structure for t being type of T, a being adjective of T holds a in adjs t iff t in types a
proof let T be TA-structure; let t be type of T, a be adjective of T; thus a in adjs t implies t in types a by Def12; assume t in types a; then ex t9 being type of T st t = t9 & a in adjs t9 by Def12; hence thesis; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th13
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty TA-structure for t being type of T, A being Subset of the adjectives of T holds A c= adjs t iff t in types A
proof let T be non empty TA-structure; let t be type of T, a be Subset of the adjectives of T; hereby assume a c= adjs t; then for b being adjective of T st b in a holds t in types b by Th13; hence t in types a by Def13; end; assume A1: t in types a; let x be set; assume A2: x in a; then rec...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th14
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non void TA-structure for t being type of T holds adjs t = {a where a is adjective of T: t in types a}
proof let T be non void TA-structure; let t be type of T; set X = {a where a is adjective of T: t in types a}; thus adjs t c= X proof let x be set; assume A1: x in adjs t; then reconsider a = x as adjective of T; t in types a by A1,Th13; hence thesis; end; let x be set; assume x in X...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T15
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty TA-structure holds types ({} the adjectives of T) = the carrier of T
proof let T be non empty TA-structure; thus types ({} the adjectives of T) c= the carrier of T; let x be set; assume x in the carrier of T; then reconsider t = x as type of T; for a being adjective of T st a in {} the adjectives of T holds t in types a; hence thesis by Def13; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th16
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T1,T2 being TA-structure st the TA-structure of T1 = the TA-structure of T2 holds T1 is adjs-typed implies T2 is adjs-typed
proof let T1,T2 be TA-structure such that A1: the TA-structure of T1 = the TA-structure of T2 and A2: for a being adjective of T1 holds types a \/ types non-a is non empty; let b be adjective of T2; reconsider a = b as adjective of T1 by A1; A3: types a \/ types non-a is non empty by A2; types a = types b by A1...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th17
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being consistent TA-structure for a being adjective of T holds types a misses types non-a
proof let T be consistent TA-structure; let a be adjective of T; assume types a meets types non-a; then consider x being set such that A1: x in types a and A2: x in types non-a by XBOOLE_0:3; A3: ex t2 being type of T st x = t2 & non-a in adjs t2 by A2,Def12; ex t1 being type of T st x = t1 & a in adjs t1 by ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T18
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for a being adjective of T for t being type of T st a is_applicable_to t holds types a /\ downarrow t is Ideal of T
proof let T be adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let a be adjective of T; let t be type of T; given t9 being type of T such that A1: t9 in types a and A2: t9 <= t; t9 in downarrow t by A2,WAYBEL_0:17; hence thesis by A1,WAYBEL_0:27,44,XBOOLE_0:def 4; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th19
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for a being adjective of T st a is_applicable_to t holds a ast t <= t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be adjective of T; assume a is_applicable_to t; then types a /\ downarrow t is Ideal of T by Th19; then sup (types a /\ downarrow t) in types a /\ downarrow t by Th1; then a a...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th20
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for a being adjective of T st a is_applicable_to t holds a in adjs(a ast t)
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be adjective of T; assume a is_applicable_to t; then types a /\ downarrow t is Ideal of T by Th19; then sup (types a /\ downarrow t) in types a /\ downarrow t by Th1; then a a...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th21
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for a being adjective of T st a is_applicable_to t holds a ast t in types a
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be adjective of T; assume a is_applicable_to t; then types a /\ downarrow t is Ideal of T by Th19; then sup (types a /\ downarrow t) in types a /\ downarrow t by Th1; hence th...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th22
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for a being adjective of T for t9 being type of T st t9 <= t & a in adjs t9 holds a is_applicable_to t & t9 <= a ast t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be adjective of T; let t9 be type of T; assume that A1: t9 <= t and A2: a in adjs t9; A3: t9 in downarrow t by A1,WAYBEL_0:17; thus a is_applicable_to t proof take t9; ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th23
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for a being adjective of T st a in adjs t holds a is_applicable_to t & a ast t = t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be adjective of T; assume A1: a in adjs t; hence a is_applicable_to t by Th23; then A2: a ast t <= t by Th20; t <= a ast t by A1,Th23; hence thesis by A2,YELLOW_0:def 3; end...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th24
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for a,b being adjective of T st a is_applicable_to t & b is_applicable_to a ast t holds b is_applicable_to t & a is_applicable_to b ast t & a ast (b ast t) = b ast (a ast t)
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a,b be adjective of T such that A1: a is_applicable_to t and A2: b is_applicable_to a ast t; consider t9 being type of T such that A3: t9 in types b and A4: t9 <= a ast t by A2,Def15;...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T25
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for A being Subset of the adjectives of T for t being type of T st A is_applicable_to t holds types A /\ downarrow t is Ideal of T
proof let T be adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let A be Subset of the adjectives of T; let t be type of T; given t9 being type of T such that A1: A c= adjs t9 and A2: t9 <= t; A3: t9 in downarrow t by A2,WAYBEL_0:17; t9 in types A by A1,Th14; hence thesis by A3...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th26
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty reflexive transitive antisymmetric TA-structure for t being type of T holds ({} the adjectives of T) ast t = t
proof let T be non empty reflexive transitive antisymmetric TA-structure; let t be type of T; set A = {} the adjectives of T; types A = the carrier of T by Th16; then types A /\ downarrow t = downarrow t by XBOOLE_1:28; hence thesis by WAYBEL_0:34; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th27
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T holds apply(<*> the adjectives of T, t) = <*t*>
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure; let t be type of T; A1: apply(<*> the adjectives of T, t).1 = t by Def19; len apply(<*> the adjectives of T, t) = 0+1 by Def19,CARD_1:27; hence thesis by A1,FINSEQ_1:40; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:T28
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T, a be adjective of T holds apply(<*a*>, t) = <*t, a ast t *>
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure; let t be type of T, a be adjective of T; A1: <*a*>.1 = a by FINSEQ_1:40; A2: apply(<*a*>, t).1 = t by Def19; A3: len <*a*> = 1 by FINSEQ_1:40; then A4: len apply(<*a*>, t) = 1+1 by Def19; 1 in dom <*a*> by A3,FINSEQ_3:25; then apply(<*a*>, t...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th29
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T holds (<*> the adjectives of T) ast t = t
by Def19
theorem
abcmiz_0:T30
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T for a being adjective of T holds <*a*> ast t = a ast t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be adjective of T; A1: len <*a*> = 1 by FINSEQ_1:40; apply(<*a*>, t) = <*t, a ast t*> by Th29; hence thesis by A1,FINSEQ_1:44; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th31
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for p,q being FinSequence for i being Nat st i >= 1 & i < len p holds (p$^q).i = p.i
proof let p,q be FinSequence; let i be Nat; assume that A1: i >= 1 and A2: i < len p; per cases; suppose q = {}; hence thesis by REWRITE1:1; end; suppose q <> {}; then consider j being Element of NAT, r being FinSequence such that A3: len p = j+1 and A4: r = p|Seg j and A5: p$^q = r^q by A...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T32
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for p being non empty FinSequence, q being FinSequence for i being Nat st i < len q holds (p$^q).(len p+i) = q.(i+1)
proof let p be non empty FinSequence, q be FinSequence; let i be Nat; A1: i+1 >= 1 by NAT_1:11; assume A2: i < len q; then consider j being Element of NAT, r being FinSequence such that A3: len p = j+1 and A4: r = p|Seg j and A5: p$^q = r^q by CARD_1:27,REWRITE1:def 1; i+1 <= len q by A2,NAT_1:13; then A6: ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th33
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T for v1,v2 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T holds apply(v1^v2, t) = apply(v1, t) $^ apply(v2, v1 ast t)
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v1,v2 be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; consider tt being FinSequence of the carrier of T, q being Element of T such that A1: apply(v1,t) = tt^<*q*> by HILBERT2:4; set s = apply(v1, t) $^ apply(v2, v1 ast t), p...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th34
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T for v1,v2 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T for i being Nat st i in dom v1 holds apply(v1^v2, t).i = apply(v1, t).i
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v1,v2 be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; set v = v1^v2; consider tt being FinSequence of the carrier of T, q being Element of T such that A1: apply(v1,t) = tt^<*q*> by HILBERT2:4; let i be Nat; A2: len apply(v...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th35
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T for v1,v2 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T holds apply(v1^v2, t).(len v1+1) = v1 ast t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v1,v2 be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; set v = v1^v2; A1: len apply(v2, v1 ast t) = len v2+1 by Def19; A2: apply(v,t) = apply(v1,t) $^ apply(v2, v1 ast t) by Th34; len apply(v1,t) = len v1+1 by Def19; then app...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th36
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T for v1,v2 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T holds v2 ast (v1 ast t) = v1^v2 ast t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v1,v2 be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; set v = v1^v2; consider tt being FinSequence of the carrier of T, q being Element of T such that A1: apply(v1,t) = tt^<*q*> by HILBERT2:4; A2: len apply(v1,t) = len v1+1 ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th37
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T holds <*> the adjectives of T is_applicable_to t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure; let t be type of T; let i be Nat; thus thesis; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:T38
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T, a being adjective of T holds a is_applicable_to t iff <*a*> is_applicable_to t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be adjective of T; set v = <*a*>; A1: v.1 = a by FINSEQ_1:40; hereby assume A2: a is_applicable_to t; thus <*a*> is_applicable_to t proof let i be Nat, b be adjective of T, s be type of T; as...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T39
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure for t being type of T for v1,v2 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v1^ v2 is_applicable_to t holds v1 is_applicable_to t & v2 is_applicable_to v1 ast t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v1,v2 be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; set v = v1^v2; A1: apply(v,t) = apply(v1,t)$^apply(v2, v1 ast t) by Th34; A2: len apply(v2, v1 ast t) = len v2+1 by Def19; assume A3: for i being Nat, a being adjective of ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th40
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure for t being type of T for v being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v is_applicable_to t for i1,i2 being Nat st 1 <= i1 & i1 <= i2 & i2 <= len v+1 for t1,t2 being type of T st t1 = apply(v,t).i1 & t2 = ...
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v be FinSequence of the adjectives of T such that A1: for i being Nat, a being adjective of T, s being type of T st i in dom v & a = v.i & s = apply(v,t).i holds a is_applica...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th41
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure for t being type of T for v being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v is_applicable_to t for s being type of T st s in rng apply(v, t) holds v ast t <= s & s <= t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v be FinSequence of the adjectives of T such that A1: v is_applicable_to t; A2: len apply(v,t) = len v+1 by Def19; let s be type of T; assume s in rng apply(v,t); then co...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th42
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure for t being type of T for v being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v is_applicable_to t holds v ast t <= t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v be FinSequence of the adjectives of T such that A1: v is_applicable_to t; A2: len v+1 >= 1 by NAT_1:11; len apply(v,t) = len v+1 by Def19; then len v+1 in dom apply(v, t)...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th43
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure for t being type of T for v being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v is_applicable_to t holds rng v c= adjs (v ast t)
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v be FinSequence of the adjectives of T such that A1: v is_applicable_to t; let a be set; assume A2: a in rng v; then consider x being set such that A3: x in dom v and A4...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th44
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure for t being type of T for v being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v is_applicable_to t for A being Subset of the adjectives of T st A = rng v holds A is_applicable_to t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; assume A1: v is_applicable_to t; then A2: rng v c= adjs (v ast t) by Th44; v ast t <= t by A1,Th43; hence thesis by A2,Def16; e...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th45
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure for t being type of T for v1, v2 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v1 is_applicable_to t & rng v2 c= rng v1 for s being type of T st s in rng apply(v2,t) holds v1 ast t <= s
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v,v9 be FinSequence of the adjectives of T such that A1: v is_applicable_to t and A2: rng v9 c= rng v; defpred P[Nat] means $1 <= len apply(v9,t) implies for s being type of ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th46
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure for t being type of T for v1, v2 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v1^v2 is_applicable_to t holds v2^v1 is_applicable_to t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v1,v2 be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; A1: rng (v1^v2) = rng v1 \/ rng v2 by FINSEQ_1:31; assume A2: v1^v2 is_applicable_to t; then A3: rng (v1^v2) c= adjs ((v1^v2) a...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th47
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure for t being type of T for v1, v2 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v1^v2 is_applicable_to t holds v1^v2 ast t = v2^v1 ast t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure; let t be type of T; let v1,v2 be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; assume A1: v1^v2 is_applicable_to t; A2: len (v1^v2) = len v1+len v2 by FINSEQ_1:22; A3: rng (v1^v2) = rng v1 \/ rng v2 by FINSEQ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T48
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for A being Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_applicable_to t holds A ast t <= t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be Subset of the adjectives of T; assume a is_applicable_to t; then types a /\ downarrow t is Ideal of T by Th26; then sup (types a /\ downarrow t) in types a /\ downarrow t by ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th49
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for A being Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_applicable_to t holds A c= adjs(A ast t)
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be Subset of the adjectives of T; assume a is_applicable_to t; then types a /\ downarrow t is Ideal of T by Th26; then sup (types a /\ downarrow t) in types a /\ downarrow t by ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th50
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for A being Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_applicable_to t holds A ast t in types A
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be Subset of the adjectives of T; assume a is_applicable_to t; then types a /\ downarrow t is Ideal of T by Th26; then sup (types a /\ downarrow t) in types a /\ downarrow t by ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T51
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for A being Subset of the adjectives of T for t9 being type of T st t9 <= t & A c= adjs t9 holds A is_applicable_to t & t9 <= A ast t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be Subset of the adjectives of T; let t9 be type of T; assume that A1: t9 <= t and A2: a c= adjs t9; A3: t9 in downarrow t by A1,WAYBEL_0:17; thus a is_applicable_to t proof ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th52
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure for t being type of T for A being Subset of the adjectives of T st A c= adjs t holds A is_applicable_to t & A ast t = t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema TA-structure; let t be type of T; let a be Subset of the adjectives of T; assume A1: a c= adjs t; hence a is_applicable_to t by Th52; then A2: a ast t <= t by Th49; t <= a ast t by A1,Th52; hence thesis by A2,YELL...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T53
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being TA-structure, t being type of T for A,B being Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_applicable_to t & B c= A holds B is_applicable_to t
proof let T be TA-structure; let t be type of T; let A,B be Subset of the adjectives of T; given t9 being type of T such that A1: A c= adjs t9 and A2: t9 <= t; assume A3: B c= A; take t9; thus thesis by A1,A2,A3,XBOOLE_1:1; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th54
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure for t being type of T, a being adjective of T for A,B being Subset of the adjectives of T st B = A \/ {a } & B is_applicable_to t holds a ast (A ast t) = B ast t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure; let t be type of T, a be adjective of T; let A,B be Subset of the adjectives of T such that A1: B = A \/ {a} and A2: B is_applicable_to t; A3: A is_applicable_to t by A1,A2,Th54,XBOOLE_1:7; A4: {a} c=...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th55
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure for t being type of T for v being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v is_applicable_to t for A being Subset of the adjectives of T st A = rng v holds v ast t = A ast t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TA-structure; defpred P[Element of NAT] means for t being type of T, v being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st $1 = len v & v is_applicable_to t for A being Subset of the adjectives of T st A = rng v holds v as...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th56
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure for t being type of T, v being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v is_properly_applicable_to t holds v is_applicable_to t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure; let t be type of T; let v be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; assume A1: for i being Nat, a being adjective of T, s being type of T st i in dom v & a = v.i & s = apply(v,t).i holds a is_properly_applicable_to s; let i be Nat, a be adje...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th57
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure for t being type of T holds <*> the adjectives of T is_properly_applicable_to t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure; let t be type of T; let i be Nat; thus thesis; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:T58
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure for t being type of T, a being adjective of T holds a is_properly_applicable_to t iff <*a*> is_properly_applicable_to t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure; let t be type of T; let a be adjective of T; set v = <*a*>; A1: v.1 = a by FINSEQ_1:40; hereby assume A2: a is_properly_applicable_to t; thus <*a*> is_properly_applicable_to t proof let i be Nat, b be adjective of T, s be ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T59
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure for t being type of T, v1,v2 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v1^v2 is_properly_applicable_to t holds v1 is_properly_applicable_to t & v2 is_properly_applicable_to v1 ast t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure; let t be type of T; let v1,v2 be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; set v = v1^v2; A1: apply(v,t) = apply(v1,t)$^apply(v2, v1 ast t) by Th34; A2: len apply(v2, v1 ast t) = len v2+1 by Def19; assume A3: for i being Nat, a being adjective of...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th60
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure for t being type of T, v1,v2 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st v1 is_properly_applicable_to t & v2 is_properly_applicable_to v1 ast t holds v1^v2 is_properly_applicable_to t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure; let t be type of T; let v1,v2 be FinSequence of the adjectives of T; set v = v1^v2; assume A1: for i being Nat, a being adjective of T, s being type of T st i in dom v1 & a = v1.i & s = apply(v1,t).i holds a is_properly_applicable_to s;...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th61
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure for t being type of T, A being Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_properly_applicable_to t holds A is finite
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure; let t be type of T, A be Subset of the adjectives of T; assume ex s being FinSequence of the adjectives of T st rng s = A & s is_properly_applicable_to t; hence thesis; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th62
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure for t being type of T holds {} the adjectives of T is_properly_applicable_to t
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure; let t be type of T; take s = <*> the adjectives of T; thus rng s = {} the adjectives of T; let i be Nat; thus thesis; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th63
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure for t being type of T, A being Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_properly_applicable_to t ex B being Subset of the adjectives of T st B c= A & B is_properly_applicable_to t & A ast t = B ast t & for C being Subset of the adjectives of T st C c= B &...
proof let T be non empty non void reflexive transitive TAS-structure; let t be type of T, A be Subset of the adjectives of T; defpred P[set] means ex B being Subset of the adjectives of T st $1 = B & $1 c= A & B is_properly_applicable_to t & A ast t = B ast t; assume A1: A is_properly_applicable_to t; then ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th64
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TAS-structure for t being type of T, A being Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_properly_applicable_to t ex s being one-to-one FinSequence of the adjectives of T st rng s = A & s is_properly_applicable_to t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TAS-structure; let t be type of T, A be Subset of the adjectives of T; given s9 being FinSequence of the adjectives of T such that A1: rng s9 = A and A2: s9 is_properly_applicable_to t; defpred P[Nat] means ex s ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th65
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured antisymmetric non void reflexive transitive with_suprema Noetherian TAS-structure holds T@--> c= the InternalRel of T
proof let T be adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure; let t1,t2 be Element of T; reconsider q1 = t1, q2 = t2 as type of T; assume [t1,t2] in T@-->; then consider a being adjective of T such that not a in adjs q2 and A1: a is_properly_app...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th66
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured antisymmetric non void reflexive transitive with_suprema Noetherian TAS-structure for t1,t2 being type of T st T@--> reduces t1,t2 holds t1 <= t2
proof let T be adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure; let t1,t2 be type of T; set R = T@-->; defpred P[Element of T, Element of T] means $1 <= $2; A1: for x,y,z be Element of T holds P[x, y] & P[y, z] implies P[x, z] by YELLOW_0:def 2; A2: n...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th67
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric non void with_suprema TAS-structure holds T@--> is irreflexive
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric non void with_suprema TAS-structure; set R = T@-->; let x be set; assume x in field R; assume A1: [x,x] in R; then reconsider x as type of T by ZFMISC_1:87; consider a being adjective of T such that A2: not a in adjs x and A3: a...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th68
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured antisymmetric non void reflexive transitive with_suprema Noetherian TAS-structure holds T@--> is strongly-normalizing
proof let T be adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure; set R = T@-->, Q = the InternalRel of T; A1: field R c= field Q by Th66,RELAT_1:16; A2: R c= Q by Th66; R is co-well_founded proof let Y be set; assume that A3: Y c= field R and A...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th69
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TAS-structure for t being type of T, A being finite Subset of the adjectives of T st for C being Subset of the adjectives of T st C c= A & C is_properly_applicable_to t & A ast t = C ast t holds C = A for s being one-to...
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TAS-structure; let t be type of T, A be finite Subset of the adjectives of T such that A1: for C being Subset of the adjectives of T st C c= A & C is_properly_applicable_to t & A ast t = C ast t holds C = A; let ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th70
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TAS-structure for t being type of T, A being finite Subset of the adjectives of T st for C being Subset of the adjectives of T st C c= A & C is_properly_applicable_to t & A ast t = C ast t holds C = A for s being one-to...
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TAS-structure; let t be type of T, A be finite Subset of the adjectives of T such that A1: for C being Subset of the adjectives of T st C c= A & C is_properly_applicable_to t & A ast t = C ast t holds C = A; let ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th71
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TAS-structure for t being type of T, A being finite Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_properly_applicable_to t holds T@--> reduces A ast t, t
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TAS-structure; set R = T@-->; let t be type of T, A be finite Subset of the adjectives of T; assume A is_properly_applicable_to t; then consider A9 being Subset of the adjectives of T such that A9 c= A and A1...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th72
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for X being non empty set for R being Relation of X for r being RedSequence of R st r.1 in X holds r is FinSequence of X
proof let X be non empty set; let R be Relation of X; let p be RedSequence of R such that A1: p.1 in X; let x be set; assume x in rng p; then consider i being set such that A2: i in dom p and A3: x = p.i by FUNCT_1:def 3; reconsider i as Element of NAT by A2; A4: i >= 1 by A2,FINSEQ_3:25; per cases by A...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th73
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for X being non empty set for R being Relation of X for x be Element of X, y being set st R reduces x,y holds y in X
proof let X be non empty set; let R be Relation of X; let x be Element of X, y be set; given p being RedSequence of R such that A1: p.1 = x and A2: p.len p = y; len p >= 0+1 by NAT_1:13; then len p in dom p by FINSEQ_3:25; then A3: y in rng p by A2,FUNCT_1:3; p is FinSequence of X by A1,Th73; then rng...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th74
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for X being non empty set for R being Relation of X st R is with_UN_property weakly-normalizing for x be Element of X holds nf(x, R) in X
proof let X be non empty set; let R be Relation of X such that A1: R is with_UN_property weakly-normalizing; let x be Element of X; nf(x,R) is_a_normal_form_of x, R by A1,REWRITE1:54; then R reduces x, nf(x,R) by REWRITE1:def 6; hence thesis by Th74; end;
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th75
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TAS-structure for t1, t2 being type of T st T@--> reduces t1, t2 ex A being finite Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_properly_applicable_to t2 & t1 = A ast t2
proof let T be Noetherian adj-structured reflexive transitive antisymmetric with_suprema non void TAS-structure; let t1,t2 be type of T; set R = T@-->; given p being RedSequence of R such that A1: p.1 = t1 and A2: t2 = p.len p; defpred P[set,set] means ex j being Element of NAT, a being adjective of T, t ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th76
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured antisymmetric commutative non void reflexive transitive with_suprema Noetherian TAS-structure holds T@--> is with_Church-Rosser_property with_UN_property
proof let T be adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure; set R = T@-->; R is locally-confluent proof let a,b,c be set; assume that A1: [a,b] in R and A2: [a,c] in R; reconsider t = a, t1 = b, t2 = c as type of T by A1,A2...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th77
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure for t being type of T holds T@--> reduces t, radix t
proof let T be adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure; let t be type of T; set R = T@-->; R is with_Church-Rosser_property with_UN_property strongly-normalizing Relation by Th69,Th77; then nf(t, R) is_a_normal_form_of t, R by ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th78
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure for t being type of T holds t <= radix t
by Th67,Th78
theorem
abcmiz_0:T79
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure for t being type of T for X being set st X = {t9 where t9 is type of T: ex A being finite Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_properly_applicable_to t9 & A ast t9 = t} holds ex_sup_of...
proof let T be adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure; let t be type of T; set R = T@-->; set AA = {t9 where t9 is type of T: ex A being finite Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_properly_applicable_to t9 & A ast t9 = t}; A1:...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th80
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure for t1,t2 being type of T, a being adjective of T st a is_properly_applicable_to t1 & a ast t1 <= radix t2 holds t1 <= radix t2
proof let T be adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure; let t1,t2 be type of T, a be adjective of T; set R = T@-->; set AA = {t9 where t9 is type of T: ex A being finite Subset of the adjectives of T st A is_properly_applicable_t...
theorem
abcmiz_0:Th81
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure for t1,t2 being type of T st t1 <= t2 holds radix t1 <= radix t2
proof let T be adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure; set R = T@-->; let t1, t2 be type of T such that A1: t1 <= t2; t2 <= radix t2 by Th67,Th78; then A2: t1 <= radix t2 by A1,YELLOW_0:def 2; set X = the carrier of T; defpr...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T82
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for T being adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure for t being type of T, a being adjective of T st a is_properly_applicable_to t holds radix (a ast t) = radix t
proof let T be adj-structured with_suprema antisymmetric commutative non empty non void reflexive transitive Noetherian TAS-structure; let t be type of T, a be adjective of T; A1: a in adjs t or not a in adjs t; assume a is_properly_applicable_to t; then a ast t = t or [a ast t, t] in T@--> by A1,Def31,Th24; ...
theorem
abcmiz_0:T83
mml
mml/abcmiz_0.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for f being Function holds f.x c= Union f
proof let f be Function; x in dom f or not x in dom f; then f.x in rng f or f.x = {} by FUNCT_1:3,def 2; hence thesis by XBOOLE_1:2,ZFMISC_1:74; end;
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th1
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for f being Function st Union f = {} holds f.x = {}
by Th1,XBOOLE_1:3
theorem
abcmiz_1:T2
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for f being Function for x,y being set st f = [x,y] holds x = y
proof let f be Function, x,y be set; assume A1: f = [x,y]; then A2: {x} in f by TARSKI:def 2; A3: {x,y} in f by A1,TARSKI:def 2; consider a,b being set such that A4: {x} = [a,b] by A2,RELAT_1:def 1; A5: {a} = {a,b} by A4,ZFMISC_1:5; A6: x = {a} by A4,ZFMISC_1:4; consider c,d being set such that A7: {x,y} = [c...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th3
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
(id X).:Y c= Y
proof let x be set; assume x in (id X).:Y; then ex y being set st [y,x] in id X & y in Y by RELAT_1:def 13; hence thesis by RELAT_1:def 10; end;
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th4
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for S being non void Signature for X being non-empty ManySortedSet of the carrier of S for t being Term of S, X holds t is non pair
proof let S be non void Signature; let X be non-empty ManySortedSet of the carrier of S; let t be Term of S, X; given x,y being set such that A1: t = [x,y]; (ex s being SortSymbol of S, v being Element of X.s st t.{} = [v,s]) or t.{} in [:the carrier' of S,{the carrier of S}:] by MSATERM:2; then (ex s b...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th5
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for x,y,z being set st x in {z}* & y in {z}* & card x = card y holds x = y
proof let x,y,z be set such that A1: x in {z}* and A2: y in {z}* and A3: card x = card y; reconsider x, y as FinSequence of {z} by A1,A2,FINSEQ_1:def 11; A4: dom x = Seg len x by FINSEQ_1:def 3 .= dom y by A3,FINSEQ_1:def 3; now let i be Nat; assume A5: i in dom x; then A6: x .i in rng x by FUNCT_...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th6
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for S being non void Signature for X being non empty-yielding ManySortedSet of the carrier of S for t being Element of Free(S,X) holds (ex s being SortSymbol of S, v being set st t = root-tree [v,s] & v in X.s) or ex o being OperSymbol of S, p being FinSequence of Free(S,X) st t = [o,the carrier of S]-tre...
proof let S be non void Signature; let X be non empty-yielding ManySortedSet of the carrier of S; let t be Element of Free(S,X); set V = X\/((the carrier of S)-->{0}); reconsider t9 = t as Term of S,V by MSAFREE3:8; defpred P[set] means $1 is Element of Free(S,X) implies (ex s being SortSymbol of S, v bei...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th7
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
varcl {} = {}
proof A1: for x,y st [x,y] in {} holds x c= {}; for B being set st {} c= B & for x,y st [x,y] in B holds x c= B holds {} c= B; hence thesis by A1,Def1; end;
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th8
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for A,B being set st A c= B holds varcl A c= varcl B
proof let A, B be set such that A1: A c= B; B c= varcl B by Def1; then A2: A c= varcl B by A1,XBOOLE_1:1; for x,y st [x,y] in varcl B holds x c= varcl B by Def1; hence thesis by A2,Def1; end;
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th9
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for A being set holds varcl union A = union {varcl a where a is Element of A: not contradiction}
proof let A be set; set X = {varcl a where a is Element of A: not contradiction}; A1: union A c= union X proof let x; assume x in union A; then consider Y such that A2: x in Y and A3: Y in A by TARSKI:def 4; reconsider Y as Element of A by A3; A4: Y c= varcl Y by Def1; varcl Y in X; hence ...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th10
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
varcl (X \/ Y) = (varcl X) \/ (varcl Y)
proof set A = {varcl a where a is Element of {X,Y}: not contradiction}; X \/ Y = union {X,Y} by ZFMISC_1:75; then A1: varcl (X \/ Y) = union A by Th10; A = {varcl X, varcl Y} proof thus now let x; assume x in A; then consider a being Element of {X,Y} such that A2: x = varcl a; ...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th11
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for A being non empty set st for a being Element of A holds varcl a = a holds varcl meet A = meet A
proof let B be non empty set; set A = meet B; assume A1: for a being Element of B holds varcl a = a; now thus A c= A; let x,y; assume A2: [x,y] in A; now let Y; assume A3: Y in B; then A4: [x,y] in Y by A2,SETFAM_1:def 1; Y = varcl Y by A1,A3; hence x c= Y by A4...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th12
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
varcl ((varcl X) /\ (varcl Y)) = (varcl X) /\ (varcl Y)
proof set A = (varcl X) /\ (varcl Y); now thus A c= A; let x,y; assume A1: [x,y] in A; then A2: [x,y] in varcl X by XBOOLE_0:def 4; A3: [x,y] in varcl Y by A1,XBOOLE_0:def 4; A4: x c= varcl X by A2,Def1; x c= varcl Y by A3,Def1; hence x c= A by A4,XBOOLE_1:19; end; hence varcl ((varcl X)...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th13
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for V being ManySortedSet of NAT st V.0 = {[{}, i] where i is Element of NAT: not contradiction} & for n being Nat holds V.(n+1) = {[varcl A, j] where A is Subset of V.n, j is Element of NAT: A is finite} for i,j being Element of NAT st i <= j holds V.i c= V.j
proof let V be ManySortedSet of NAT such that A1: V.0 = {[{}, i] where i is Element of NAT: not contradiction} and A2: for n being Nat holds V.(n+1) = {[varcl A, j] where A is Subset of V.n, j is Element of NAT: A is finite}; defpred Q[Nat] means V.0 c= V.$1; A3: now let j; assume Q[j]; A4: V.(j+1) = {[...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th14
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for V being ManySortedSet of NAT st V.0 = {[{}, i] where i is Element of NAT: not contradiction} & for n being Nat holds V.(n+1) = {[varcl A, j] where A is Subset of V.n, j is Element of NAT: A is finite} for A being finite Subset of Vars ex i being Element of NAT st A c= V.i
proof let V be ManySortedSet of NAT such that A1: V.0 = {[{}, i] where i is Element of NAT: not contradiction} and A2: for n being Nat holds V.(n+1) = {[varcl A, j] where A is Subset of V.n, j is Element of NAT: A is finite}; let A be finite Subset of Vars; A3: Vars = Union V by A1,A2,Def2; defpred P[set,set]...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th15
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
{[{}, i] where i is Element of NAT: not contradiction} c= Vars
proof consider V being ManySortedSet of NAT such that A1: Vars = Union V and A2: V.0 = {[{}, i] where i is Element of NAT: not contradiction} and for n being Nat holds V.(n+1) = {[varcl A, j] where A is Subset of V.n, j is Element of NAT: A is finite} by Def2; dom V = NAT by PARTFUN1:def 2; then V.0 in rng V ...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th16
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
for A being finite Subset of Vars, i being Nat holds [varcl A, i] in Vars
proof let A be finite Subset of Vars, i be Nat; consider V being ManySortedSet of NAT such that A1: Vars = Union V and A2: V.0 = {[{}, k] where k is Element of NAT: not contradiction} and A3: for n being Nat holds V.(n+1) = {[varcl b, j] where b is Subset of V.n, j is Element of NAT: b is finite} by Def2; con...
theorem
abcmiz_1:Th17
mml
mml/abcmiz_1.miz
[]
[]
https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML
047822c4d814630b28eec8ca6b455e9eb912d5ff
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Mizar

A structured dataset of theorems and schemes from the Mizar Mathematical Library (MML), one of the largest libraries of formalized mathematics.

Source

Schema

Column Type Description
statement string Declaration signature/claim with the leading keyword removed (verbatim slice); the full declaration minus its proof
proof string Verbatim proof/body, empty if the declaration has none
type string Declaration keyword
symbolic_name string Declaration identifier
library string Sub-library
filename string Repository-relative source path
imports list[string] File-level Require/Import modules
deps list[string] Intra-corpus identifiers referenced
docstring string Preceding documentation comment, empty if absent
source_url string Upstream repository
commit string Upstream commit extracted

Statistics

  • Entries: 51,673
  • With proof: 50,494 (97.7%)
  • With docstring: 0 (0.0%)
  • Libraries: 1

By type

Type Count
theorem 51,673

Example

for A1,A2 being AdjectiveStr st the adjectives of A1 = the adjectives
  of A2 holds A1 is void implies A2 is void
proof
  let A1,A2 be AdjectiveStr such that
A1: the adjectives of A1 = the adjectives of A2;
  assume the adjectives of A1 is empty;
  hence the adjectives of A2 is empty by A1;
end;
  • type: theorem | symbolic_name: abcmiz_0:T2 | mml/abcmiz_0.miz

Use

Each declaration is split into a statement (signature/claim) and a proof (body) that are disjoint and together form the complete declaration, for proof modeling, autoformalization, retrieval, and dependency analysis via deps.

Citation

@misc{mizar_dataset,
  title  = {Mizar},
  author = {Norton, Charles},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Extracted from https://github.com/MizarSystem/MML, commit 047822c4d814},
  url    = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/phanerozoic/Mizar}
}
Downloads last month
120

Collection including phanerozoic/Mizar