url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
have h₁ : ∀ x ∈ range ↑n, Summable (λ (x_1 : ℕ) => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑(Nat.factorial x_1) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) := by intros k _ exact Summable.smul_const (ExpTaylorSeriesSummable (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I))) _
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₁ : ∀ x ∈ range ↑n, Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
have h₂ := (tsum_sum h₁).symm
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₁ : ∀ x ∈ range ↑n, Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₁ : ∀ x ∈ range ↑n, Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) h₂ : ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (b : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) = ∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₁ : ∀ x ∈ range ↑n, Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
clear h₁
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₁ : ∀ x ∈ range ↑n, Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) h₂ : ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (b : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) = ∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₂ : ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (b : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) = ∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₁ : ∀ x ∈ range ↑n, Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) h₂ : ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (b : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) = ∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp_rw [h₂]
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₂ : ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (b : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) = ∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₂ : ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (b : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) = ∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₂ : ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (b : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) = ∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑ x ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (x_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
clear h₂
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₂ : ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (b : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) = ∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₂ : ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, ∑' (b : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) = ∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp_rw [mul_pow, ←Complex.exp_nat_mul]
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ i ∈ range ↑n, (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ b / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑i / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
have h₃ : ∀ (b x : ℕ), z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑(Nat.factorial b) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = (z ^ b / ↑(Nat.factorial b)) * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) := by intros b x ring_nf
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₃ : ∀ (b x : ℕ), z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp_rw [h₃, ←Finset.mul_sum, ←Complex.exp_add, ←tsum_div_const, RuesDiff]
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₃ : ∀ (b x : ℕ), z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₃ : ∀ (b x : ℕ), z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ⊢ (∑' (k : ℕ), if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = ∑' (x : ℕ), (z ^ x / ↑x.factorial * ∑ x_1 ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑x * (2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₃ : ∀ (b x : ℕ), z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ⊢ RuesDiff n m z = (∑' (b : ℕ), ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
clear h₃
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₃ : ∀ (b x : ℕ), z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ⊢ (∑' (k : ℕ), if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = ∑' (x : ℕ), (z ^ x / ↑x.factorial * ∑ x_1 ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑x * (2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ (∑' (k : ℕ), if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = ∑' (x : ℕ), (z ^ x / ↑x.factorial * ∑ x_1 ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑x * (2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ h₃ : ∀ (b x : ℕ), z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ⊢ (∑' (k : ℕ), if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = ∑' (x : ℕ), (z ^ x / ↑x.factorial * ∑ x_1 ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑x * (2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
congr
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ (∑' (k : ℕ), if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = ∑' (x : ℕ), (z ^ x / ↑x.factorial * ∑ x_1 ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑x * (2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
case e_f n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ (fun k => if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = fun x => (z ^ x / ↑x.factorial * ∑ x_1 ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑x * (2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ (∑' (k : ℕ), if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = ∑' (x : ℕ), (z ^ x / ↑x.factorial * ∑ x_1 ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑x * (2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
ext1 k
case e_f n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ (fun k => if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = fun x => (z ^ x / ↑x.factorial * ∑ x_1 ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑x * (2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ (fun k => if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = fun x => (z ^ x / ↑x.factorial * ∑ x_1 ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑x * (2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x_1 / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
have h₄ : ∀ (x : ℕ), ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I) := by intros x ring_nf
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₄ : ∀ (x : ℕ), ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp_rw [h₄]
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₄ : ∀ (x : ℕ), ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₄ : ∀ (x : ℕ), ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₄ : ∀ (x : ℕ), ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
clear h₄
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₄ : ∀ (x : ℕ), ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₄ : ∀ (x : ℕ), ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
have h₅ := RouGeometricSumEqIte n (↑k + m)
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
have h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) := by intros x simp only [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_natCast] ring_nf
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp_rw [h₆, h₅]
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp only [mul_ite, mul_zero]
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
have hem := Classical.em (↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m)
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hem : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ∨ ¬↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
rcases hem with hemt | hemf
case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hem : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ∨ ¬↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h.inl n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemt : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n case e_f.h.inr n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemf : ¬↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hem : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ∨ ¬↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
intros k
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ ∀ (k : ℕ), cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) = ∑' (k_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ k_1 / ↑k_1.factorial
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) = ∑' (k_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ k_1 / ↑k_1.factorial
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ ∀ (k : ℕ), cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) = ∑' (k_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ k_1 / ↑k_1.factorial TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
exact ExpTsumForm (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I))
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) = ∑' (k_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ k_1 / ↑k_1.factorial
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) = ∑' (k_1 : ℕ), (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ k_1 / ↑k_1.factorial TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
intros k _
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ ∀ x ∈ range ↑n, Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ a✝ : k ∈ range ↑n ⊢ Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ ∀ x ∈ range ↑n, Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
exact Summable.smul_const (ExpTaylorSeriesSummable (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I))) _
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ a✝ : k ∈ range ↑n ⊢ Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ a✝ : k ∈ range ↑n ⊢ Summable fun x_1 => (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) ^ x_1 / ↑x_1.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
intros b x
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ ∀ (b x : ℕ), z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I))
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ b x : ℕ ⊢ z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ ⊢ ∀ (b x : ℕ), z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
ring_nf
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ b x : ℕ ⊢ z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ b x : ℕ ⊢ z ^ b * cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑b.factorial * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) = z ^ b / ↑b.factorial * (cexp (↑b * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) * cexp (↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
intros x
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ ∀ (x : ℕ), ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k x : ℕ ⊢ ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ ∀ (x : ℕ), ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
ring_nf
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k x : ℕ ⊢ ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k x : ℕ ⊢ ↑k * (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑m * 2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
intros x
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 ⊢ ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 x : ℕ ⊢ 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 ⊢ ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp only [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_natCast]
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 x : ℕ ⊢ 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 x : ℕ ⊢ 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 x : ℕ ⊢ 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
ring_nf
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 x : ℕ ⊢ 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 x : ℕ ⊢ 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp_rw [if_pos hemt]
case e_f.h.inl n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemt : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h.inl n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemt : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ z ^ k / ↑k.factorial = z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h.inl n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemt : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
ring_nf
case e_f.h.inl n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemt : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ z ^ k / ↑k.factorial = z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n / ↑↑n
case e_f.h.inl n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemt : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ z ^ k * (↑k.factorial)⁻¹ = z ^ k * (↑k.factorial)⁻¹ * ↑↑n * (↑↑n)⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h.inl n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemt : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ z ^ k / ↑k.factorial = z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp only [ne_eq, Nat.cast_eq_zero, PNat.ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, mul_inv_cancel_right₀]
case e_f.h.inl n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemt : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ z ^ k * (↑k.factorial)⁻¹ = z ^ k * (↑k.factorial)⁻¹ * ↑↑n * (↑↑n)⁻¹
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h.inl n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemt : ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ z ^ k * (↑k.factorial)⁻¹ = z ^ k * (↑k.factorial)⁻¹ * ↑↑n * (↑↑n)⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp_rw [if_neg hemf]
case e_f.h.inr n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemf : ¬↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n
case e_f.h.inr n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemf : ¬↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ 0 = 0 / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h.inr n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemf : ¬↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial else 0) = (if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then z ^ k / ↑k.factorial * ↑↑n else 0) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffEqualsExpSum
[310, 1]
[352, 25]
simp only [zero_div]
case e_f.h.inr n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemf : ¬↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ 0 = 0 / ↑↑n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_f.h.inr n : ℕ+ m : ℤ z : ℂ k : ℕ h₅ : ∑ x ∈ range ↑n, cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I)) = if ↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m then ↑↑n else 0 h₆ : ∀ (x : ℕ), 2 * ↑π * ((↑k + ↑m) * ↑x / ↑↑n) * I = 2 * ↑π * (↑(↑k + m) * ↑x / ↑↑n * I) hemf : ¬↑↑n ∣ ↑k + m ⊢ 0 = 0 / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesNMthIteratedDeriv
[354, 1]
[356, 23]
rw [←RuesDiffM0EqualsRues, RuesDiffIteratedDeriv]
n m : ℕ+ ⊢ iteratedDeriv (↑m) (Rues n) = RuesDiff n ↑↑m
n m : ℕ+ ⊢ RuesDiff n (↑↑m + 0) = RuesDiff n ↑↑m
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n m : ℕ+ ⊢ iteratedDeriv (↑m) (Rues n) = RuesDiff n ↑↑m TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesNMthIteratedDeriv
[354, 1]
[356, 23]
simp only [add_zero]
n m : ℕ+ ⊢ RuesDiff n (↑↑m + 0) = RuesDiff n ↑↑m
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n m : ℕ+ ⊢ RuesDiff n (↑↑m + 0) = RuesDiff n ↑↑m TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffMod
[358, 1]
[363, 10]
rw [RuesDiffMPeriodic n (m % n) (m / n)]
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ RuesDiff n m = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n)
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ RuesDiff n m = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ RuesDiff n m = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffMod
[358, 1]
[363, 10]
nth_rw 1 [←Int.ediv_add_emod' m n]
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ RuesDiff n m = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n)
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ RuesDiff n (m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n) = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ RuesDiff n m = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffMod
[358, 1]
[363, 10]
suffices h₀ : m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n = m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ RuesDiff n (m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n) = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n)
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ h₀ : m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n = m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n ⊢ RuesDiff n (m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n) = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n) case h₀ n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n = m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ RuesDiff n (m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n) = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffMod
[358, 1]
[363, 10]
exact congrArg (RuesDiff n) h₀
n : ℕ+ m : ℤ h₀ : m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n = m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n ⊢ RuesDiff n (m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n) = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n) case h₀ n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n = m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n
case h₀ n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n = m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ m : ℤ h₀ : m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n = m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n ⊢ RuesDiff n (m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n) = RuesDiff n (m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n) case h₀ n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n = m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesDiffMod
[358, 1]
[363, 10]
ring_nf
case h₀ n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n = m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h₀ n : ℕ+ m : ℤ ⊢ m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n + m % ↑↑n = m % ↑↑n + m / ↑↑n * ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpPiMulIHalf
[365, 1]
[368, 14]
rw [exp_mul_I]
⊢ cexp (↑(π / 2) * I) = I
⊢ (↑(π / 2)).cos + (↑(π / 2)).sin * I = I
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ cexp (↑(π / 2) * I) = I TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpPiMulIHalf
[365, 1]
[368, 14]
simp only [ofReal_div, ofReal_ofNat, Complex.cos_pi_div_two, Complex.sin_pi_div_two, one_mul, zero_add]
⊢ (↑(π / 2)).cos + (↑(π / 2)).sin * I = I
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ (↑(π / 2)).cos + (↑(π / 2)).sin * I = I TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
induction' k with K Kih
k : ℕ ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑k / 2) = I ^ k
case zero ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑0 / 2) = I ^ 0 case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑(K + 1) / 2) = I ^ (K + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k : ℕ ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑k / 2) = I ^ k TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
simp only [Nat.zero_eq, CharP.cast_eq_zero, mul_zero, zero_div, Complex.exp_zero, pow_zero]
case zero ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑0 / 2) = I ^ 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case zero ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑0 / 2) = I ^ 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
simp_rw [Nat.cast_succ]
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑(K + 1) / 2) = I ^ (K + 1)
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2) = I ^ (K + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑(K + 1) / 2) = I ^ (K + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
have h₀ : ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I := by simp only [ofReal_div, ofReal_ofNat] ring_nf
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2) = I ^ (K + 1)
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₀ : ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2) = I ^ (K + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2) = I ^ (K + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
rw [h₀]
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₀ : ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2) = I ^ (K + 1)
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₀ : ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I) = I ^ (K + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₀ : ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2) = I ^ (K + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
clear h₀
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₀ : ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I) = I ^ (K + 1)
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I) = I ^ (K + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₀ : ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I) = I ^ (K + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
rw [Complex.exp_add, Kih, ExpPiMulIHalf]
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I) = I ^ (K + 1)
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ I ^ K * I = I ^ (K + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I) = I ^ (K + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
have h₂ := zpow_add₀ I_ne_zero K 1
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ I ^ K * I = I ^ (K + 1)
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₂ : I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ ↑K * I ^ 1 ⊢ I ^ K * I = I ^ (K + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ I ^ K * I = I ^ (K + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
simp only [zpow_natCast, zpow_one] at h₂
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₂ : I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ ↑K * I ^ 1 ⊢ I ^ K * I = I ^ (K + 1)
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₂ : I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ K * I ⊢ I ^ K * I = I ^ (K + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₂ : I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ ↑K * I ^ 1 ⊢ I ^ K * I = I ^ (K + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
rw [←h₂]
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₂ : I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ K * I ⊢ I ^ K * I = I ^ (K + 1)
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₂ : I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ K * I ⊢ I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ (K + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₂ : I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ K * I ⊢ I ^ K * I = I ^ (K + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
exact rfl
case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₂ : I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ K * I ⊢ I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ (K + 1)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K h₂ : I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ K * I ⊢ I ^ (↑K + 1) = I ^ (K + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
simp only [ofReal_div, ofReal_ofNat]
K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I
K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑π / 2 * I
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑(π / 2) * I TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
ExpToNatPowersOfI
[370, 1]
[383, 14]
ring_nf
K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑π / 2 * I
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: K : ℕ Kih : cexp (↑π * I * ↑K / 2) = I ^ K ⊢ ↑π * I * (↑K + 1) / 2 = ↑π * I * ↑K / 2 + ↑π / 2 * I TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesNEqualsExpSum
[385, 1]
[389, 48]
rw [←RuesDiffM0EqualsRues, RuesDiffEqualsExpSum]
n : ℕ+ z : ℂ ⊢ Rues n z = (∑ m ∈ range ↑n, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I))) / ↑↑n
n : ℕ+ z : ℂ ⊢ (∑ k₀ ∈ range ↑n, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑0 * 2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n = (∑ m ∈ range ↑n, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I))) / ↑↑n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ z : ℂ ⊢ Rues n z = (∑ m ∈ range ↑n, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I))) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesNEqualsExpSum
[385, 1]
[389, 48]
congr
n : ℕ+ z : ℂ ⊢ (∑ k₀ ∈ range ↑n, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑0 * 2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n = (∑ m ∈ range ↑n, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I))) / ↑↑n
case e_a.e_f n : ℕ+ z : ℂ ⊢ (fun k₀ => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑0 * 2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I)) = fun m => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ z : ℂ ⊢ (∑ k₀ ∈ range ↑n, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑0 * 2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I)) / ↑↑n = (∑ m ∈ range ↑n, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I))) / ↑↑n TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesNEqualsExpSum
[385, 1]
[389, 48]
ext1 k
case e_a.e_f n : ℕ+ z : ℂ ⊢ (fun k₀ => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑0 * 2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I)) = fun m => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I))
case e_a.e_f.h n : ℕ+ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑0 * 2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I) = cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a.e_f n : ℕ+ z : ℂ ⊢ (fun k₀ => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑0 * 2 * ↑π * (↑k₀ / ↑↑n) * I)) = fun m => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesNEqualsExpSum
[385, 1]
[389, 48]
simp only [Int.cast_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
case e_a.e_f.h n : ℕ+ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑0 * 2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I) = cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a.e_f.h n : ℕ+ z : ℂ k : ℕ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I) + ↑0 * 2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I) = cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑k / ↑↑n) * I)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesZ0Equals1
[391, 1]
[394, 65]
rw [RuesNEqualsExpSum]
n : ℕ+ ⊢ Rues n 0 = 1
n : ℕ+ ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑n, cexp (0 * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I))) / ↑↑n = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ ⊢ Rues n 0 = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesZ0Equals1
[391, 1]
[394, 65]
simp only [zero_mul, Complex.exp_zero, sum_const, card_range, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_one, ne_eq, Nat.cast_eq_zero, PNat.ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, div_self]
n : ℕ+ ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑n, cexp (0 * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I))) / ↑↑n = 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : ℕ+ ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑n, cexp (0 * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑n) * I))) / ↑↑n = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN1EqualsExp
[396, 1]
[399, 36]
ext1 z
⊢ Rues 1 = cexp
case h z : ℂ ⊢ Rues 1 z = cexp z
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ Rues 1 = cexp TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN1EqualsExp
[396, 1]
[399, 36]
rw [Rues, ExpTsumForm]
case h z : ℂ ⊢ Rues 1 z = cexp z
case h z : ℂ ⊢ ∑' (k : ℕ), z ^ (↑1 * k) / ↑(↑1 * k).factorial = ∑' (k : ℕ), z ^ k / ↑k.factorial
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h z : ℂ ⊢ Rues 1 z = cexp z TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN1EqualsExp
[396, 1]
[399, 36]
simp only [PNat.one_coe, one_mul]
case h z : ℂ ⊢ ∑' (k : ℕ), z ^ (↑1 * k) / ↑(↑1 * k).factorial = ∑' (k : ℕ), z ^ k / ↑k.factorial
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h z : ℂ ⊢ ∑' (k : ℕ), z ^ (↑1 * k) / ↑(↑1 * k).factorial = ∑' (k : ℕ), z ^ k / ↑k.factorial TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
ext1 z
⊢ Rues 2 = Complex.cosh
case h z : ℂ ⊢ Rues 2 z = z.cosh
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: ⊢ Rues 2 = Complex.cosh TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
rw [RuesNEqualsExpSum, Complex.cosh]
case h z : ℂ ⊢ Rues 2 z = z.cosh
case h z : ℂ ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑2, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑2) * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h z : ℂ ⊢ Rues 2 z = z.cosh TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
have h₀ : range (2 : ℕ+) = {0, 1} := by rfl
case h z : ℂ ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑2, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑2) * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑2, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑2) * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h z : ℂ ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑2, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑2) * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
simp_rw [h₀, Finset.sum]
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑2, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑2) * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ (Multiset.map (fun x => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑2) * I))) {0, 1}.val).sum / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑2, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑2) * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
simp only [mem_singleton, insert_val, singleton_val, Multiset.mem_singleton, not_false_eq_true, Multiset.ndinsert_of_not_mem, Multiset.map_cons, CharP.cast_eq_zero, zero_div, mul_zero, zero_mul, Complex.exp_zero, mul_one, Multiset.map_singleton, Nat.cast_one, one_div, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.sum_singleton]
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ (Multiset.map (fun x => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑2) * I))) {0, 1}.val).sum / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ (Multiset.map (fun x => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑↑2) * I))) {0, 1}.val).sum / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
have h₁ : cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑(2 : ℕ+))⁻¹ * I) = -1 := by have h₂ : 2 * (π : ℂ) * (↑↑(2 : ℕ+))⁻¹ = π := by field_simp rw [h₂] simp only [exp_pi_mul_I]
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₁ : cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
simp_rw [h₁]
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₁ : cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₁ : cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (z * -1)) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₁ : cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I))) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
simp only [mul_neg, mul_one]
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₁ : cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (z * -1)) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₁ : cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₁ : cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (z * -1)) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
congr
case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₁ : cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₁ : cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 ⊢ (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / ↑↑2 = (cexp z + cexp (-z)) / 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
rfl
z : ℂ ⊢ range ↑2 = {0, 1}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ ⊢ range ↑2 = {0, 1} TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
have h₂ : 2 * (π : ℂ) * (↑↑(2 : ℕ+))⁻¹ = π := by field_simp
z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1
z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₂ : 2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ = ↑π ⊢ cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
rw [h₂]
z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₂ : 2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ = ↑π ⊢ cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1
z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₂ : 2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ = ↑π ⊢ cexp (↑π * I) = -1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₂ : 2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ = ↑π ⊢ cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ * I) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
simp only [exp_pi_mul_I]
z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₂ : 2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ = ↑π ⊢ cexp (↑π * I) = -1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} h₂ : 2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ = ↑π ⊢ cexp (↑π * I) = -1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN2EqualsCosh
[401, 1]
[418, 8]
field_simp
z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ 2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ = ↑π
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₀ : range ↑2 = {0, 1} ⊢ 2 * ↑π * (↑↑2)⁻¹ = ↑π TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
rw [RuesNEqualsExpSum, Complex.cosh, Complex.cosh]
z : ℂ ⊢ Rues 4 z = (z / (1 + I)).cosh * (z / (1 - I)).cosh
z : ℂ ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑4, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑4) * I))) / ↑↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ ⊢ Rues 4 z = (z / (1 + I)).cosh * (z / (1 - I)).cosh TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
have h₀ : (4 : ℕ+) = (4 : ℕ) := by rfl
z : ℂ ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑4, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑4) * I))) / ↑↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2)
z : ℂ h₀ : ↑4 = 4 ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑4, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑4) * I))) / ↑↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑4, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑4) * I))) / ↑↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
simp_rw [h₀, Finset.sum]
z : ℂ h₀ : ↑4 = 4 ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑4, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑4) * I))) / ↑↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2)
z : ℂ h₀ : ↑4 = 4 ⊢ (Multiset.map (fun x => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑4) * I))) (range 4).val).sum / ↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₀ : ↑4 = 4 ⊢ (∑ m ∈ range ↑4, cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑m / ↑↑4) * I))) / ↑↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
clear h₀
z : ℂ h₀ : ↑4 = 4 ⊢ (Multiset.map (fun x => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑4) * I))) (range 4).val).sum / ↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2)
z : ℂ ⊢ (Multiset.map (fun x => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑4) * I))) (range 4).val).sum / ↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₀ : ↑4 = 4 ⊢ (Multiset.map (fun x => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑4) * I))) (range 4).val).sum / ↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
simp only [range_val, Multiset.range_succ, Multiset.range_zero, Multiset.cons_zero, Nat.cast_ofNat, Multiset.map_cons, Nat.cast_one, one_div, Multiset.map_singleton, CharP.cast_eq_zero, zero_div, mul_zero, zero_mul, Complex.exp_zero, mul_one, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.sum_singleton]
z : ℂ ⊢ (Multiset.map (fun x => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑4) * I))) (range 4).val).sum / ↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2)
z : ℂ ⊢ (cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (3 / 4) * I)) + (cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (2 / 4) * I)) + (cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * 4⁻¹ * I)) + cexp z))) / 4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ ⊢ (Multiset.map (fun x => cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (↑x / ↑4) * I))) (range 4).val).sum / ↑4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
ring_nf
z : ℂ ⊢ (cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (3 / 4) * I)) + (cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (2 / 4) * I)) + (cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * 4⁻¹ * I)) + cexp z))) / 4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2)
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2))) * (1 / 4) + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I)) * (1 / 4) + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (1 / 2))) * (1 / 4) + cexp z * (1 / 4) = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * (1 / 4) + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * (1 / 4) + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * (1 / 4) + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * (1 / 4)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ ⊢ (cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (3 / 4) * I)) + (cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * (2 / 4) * I)) + (cexp (z * cexp (2 * ↑π * 4⁻¹ * I)) + cexp z))) / 4 = (cexp (z / (1 + I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 + I)))) / 2 * ((cexp (z / (1 - I)) + cexp (-(z / (1 - I)))) / 2) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
simp only [one_div, exp_pi_mul_I, mul_neg, mul_one]
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2))) * (1 / 4) + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I)) * (1 / 4) + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (1 / 2))) * (1 / 4) + cexp z * (1 / 4) = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * (1 / 4) + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * (1 / 4) + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * (1 / 4) + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * (1 / 4)
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2))) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2))) * (1 / 4) + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I)) * (1 / 4) + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (1 / 2))) * (1 / 4) + cexp z * (1 / 4) = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * (1 / 4) + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * (1 / 4) + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * (1 / 4) + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * (1 / 4) TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
have h₁ : cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2)) = -I := by have h₁b := ExpToNatPowersOfI 3 simp only [Nat.cast_ofNat] at h₁b have h₁b₁ : ↑π * I * 3 / 2 = ↑π * I * (3 / 2) := by ring rw [h₁b₁] at h₁b rw [h₁b] clear h₁b h₁b₁ have h₅ : I ^ (3 : ℕ) = I ^ (3 : ℤ) := by exact rfl rw [h₅] clear h₅ have h₆ : (3 : ℤ) = 2 + 1 := by exact rfl rw [h₆] clear h₆ rw [zpow_add₀ I_ne_zero] have h₇ : (2 : ℤ) = 1 + 1 := by exact rfl rw [h₇] clear h₇ rw [zpow_add₀ I_ne_zero] simp only [zpow_one, I_mul_I, neg_mul, one_mul]
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2))) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ h₁ : cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2)) = -I ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2))) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2))) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
rw [h₁]
z : ℂ h₁ : cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2)) = -I ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2))) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ h₁ : cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2)) = -I ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₁ : cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2)) = -I ⊢ cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2))) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
clear h₁
z : ℂ h₁ : cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2)) = -I ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₁ : cexp (↑π * I * (3 / 2)) = -I ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
have h₂ : cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹) = I := by nth_rw 2 [←ExpPiMulIHalf] congr 1 simp only [ofReal_div, ofReal_ofNat] ring_nf
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ h₂ : cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹) = I ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
rw [h₂]
z : ℂ h₂ : cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹) = I ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ h₂ : cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹) = I ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₂ : cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹) = I ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
clear h₂
z : ℂ h₂ : cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹) = I ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₂ : cexp (↑π * I * 2⁻¹) = I ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
have h₃ : (1 + I)⁻¹ = (1 - I) / 2 := by rw [Inv.inv, Complex.instInv, normSq] simp only [MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, ofReal_inv, ofReal_add, ofReal_mul, map_add, map_one, conj_I, add_re, one_re, I_re, add_zero, ofReal_one, mul_one, add_im, one_im, I_im, zero_add] ring_nf
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ h₃ : (1 + I)⁻¹ = (1 - I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
rw [h₃]
z : ℂ h₃ : (1 + I)⁻¹ = (1 - I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ h₃ : (1 + I)⁻¹ = (1 - I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₃ : (1 + I)⁻¹ = (1 - I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * (1 + I)⁻¹) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * (1 + I)⁻¹)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
clear h₃
z : ℂ h₃ : (1 + I)⁻¹ = (1 - I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₃ : (1 + I)⁻¹ = (1 - I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
have h₄ : (1 - I)⁻¹ = (1 + I) / 2 := by rw [Inv.inv, Complex.instInv, normSq] simp only [MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, ofReal_inv, ofReal_add, ofReal_mul, map_sub, map_one, conj_I, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_re, one_re, I_re, sub_zero, ofReal_one, mul_one, sub_im, one_im, I_im, zero_sub, ofReal_neg, mul_neg, neg_neg] ring_nf
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ h₄ : (1 - I)⁻¹ = (1 + I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
rw [h₄]
z : ℂ h₄ : (1 - I)⁻¹ = (1 + I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ h₄ : (1 - I)⁻¹ = (1 + I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * ((1 + I) / 2)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * ((1 + I) / 2))) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * ((1 + I) / 2)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * ((1 + I) / 2))) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₄ : (1 - I)⁻¹ = (1 + I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * (1 - I)⁻¹) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * (1 - I)⁻¹)) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC:
https://github.com/Nazgand/NazgandLean4.git
a6c5455a06d14c59786b1c23c2d20dada7598be6
NazgandLean4/RootOfUnityExponentialSum.lean
RuesN4EqualsCoshCosh
[420, 1]
[488, 10]
clear h₄
z : ℂ h₄ : (1 - I)⁻¹ = (1 + I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * ((1 + I) / 2)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * ((1 + I) / 2))) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * ((1 + I) / 2)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * ((1 + I) / 2))) * 4⁻¹
z : ℂ ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * ((1 + I) / 2)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * ((1 + I) / 2))) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * ((1 + I) / 2)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * ((1 + I) / 2))) * 4⁻¹
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: z : ℂ h₄ : (1 - I)⁻¹ = (1 + I) / 2 ⊢ cexp (z * -I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-z) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * I) * 4⁻¹ + cexp z * 4⁻¹ = cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (z * ((1 + I) / 2)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (z * ((1 - I) / 2)) * cexp (-(z * ((1 + I) / 2))) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (z * ((1 + I) / 2)) * 4⁻¹ + cexp (-(z * ((1 - I) / 2))) * cexp (-(z * ((1 + I) / 2))) * 4⁻¹ TACTIC: