url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
set f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t ↦ (-1 + Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * t)) + Complex.I * (t - 1) * Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * t))) / (1 - Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * t))) ^ 2 with f'def
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
set c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t ↦ (1 - t) with cdef
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
set c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t ↦ -1 with c'def
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
set d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t ↦ (1 - Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * t))) with ddef
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
set d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t ↦ Complex.I * Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * t)) with d'def
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
have d_nonzero {t : ℝ} (ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y) : d t β‰  0 := by rw [Set.mem_uIcc] at ht have ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 := by rcases ht with ht | ht <;> (constructor <;> linarith) rw [ddef] simp rw [←norm_eq_zero] apply ne_of_gt calc β€–1 - Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))β€– _ β‰₯ |(1 - Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))).im| := by simp only [Complex.norm_eq_abs, ge_iff_le] apply Complex.abs_im_le_abs _ = Real.sin t := by simp rw [Complex.exp_im] simp apply Real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi . linarith . linarith [Real.two_le_pi] _ > 0 := by apply Real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi . linarith . linarith [Real.two_le_pi]
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
have f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t := by intro t ht have : f = fun t ↦ c t / d t := by simp rw [this] have : f' = fun t ↦ ((c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2) := by ext t rw [f'def, cdef, c'def, ddef, d'def] simp congr ring rw [this] apply HasDerivAt.div . rw [cdef, c'def] simp apply HasDerivAt.const_sub apply HasDerivAt.ofReal_comp apply hasDerivAt_id' . rw [ddef, d'def] simp rw [←neg_neg (Complex.I * Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t)))] apply HasDerivAt.const_sub rw [←neg_mul, mul_comm] apply HasDerivAt.cexp apply HasDerivAt.neg conv in fun (x : ℝ) ↦ Complex.I * (x : ℝ) => ext rw [mul_comm] set e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t ↦ t * Complex.I with edef have : (fun (t : ℝ) ↦ t * Complex.I) = fun (t : ℝ) ↦ e t := by rw [edef] rw [this] apply HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal rw [edef] apply hasDerivAt_mul_const . exact d_nonzero ht
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
have f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t ↦ f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) := by apply ContinuousOn.div . apply Continuous.continuousOn continuity . apply Continuous.continuousOn apply Continuous.pow apply Continuous.sub . apply continuous_const . apply Continuous.cexp apply Continuous.neg apply Continuous.mul . apply continuous_const . apply Complex.continuous_ofReal . intro t ht simp apply d_nonzero ht
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
calc β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑y))) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑y')))β€– _ = β€–f y - f y'β€– := by simp _ = β€–βˆ« (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' tβ€– := by congr 1 rw [intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt] . exact f_deriv . apply f'_cont.intervalIntegrable _ = β€–βˆ« (t : ℝ) in Ξ™ y' y, f' tβ€– := by apply intervalIntegral.norm_intervalIntegral_eq _ ≀ ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ξ™ y' y, β€–f' tβ€– := by apply MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_integral_norm _ ≀ ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ξ™ y' y, 3 / ((y / 2) / 2) ^ 2 := by apply MeasureTheory.setIntegral_mono_on . apply f'_cont.norm.integrableOn_uIcc.mono_set apply Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self . apply MeasureTheory.integrableOn_const.mpr right rw [Real.volume_uIoc] apply ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top . apply measurableSet_uIoc . intro t ht rw [Set.mem_uIoc] at ht have ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 := by rcases ht with ht | ht <;> (constructor <;> linarith) rw [f'def] simp only [norm_div, Complex.norm_eq_abs, norm_pow] gcongr . calc Complex.abs (-1 + Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t)) + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))) _ ≀ Complex.abs (-1 + Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))) + Complex.abs (Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))) := by apply Complex.abs.isAbsoluteValue.abv_add _ ≀ Complex.abs (-1) + Complex.abs (Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))) + Complex.abs (Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))) := by gcongr apply Complex.abs.isAbsoluteValue.abv_add _ ≀ 1 + 1 + 1 := by gcongr . simp . rw [mul_comm, ←neg_mul] norm_cast apply le_of_eq apply Complex.abs_exp_ofReal_mul_I . simp apply mul_le_one norm_cast rw [abs_of_nonpos] <;> linarith simp rw [mul_comm, ←neg_mul] norm_cast apply le_of_eq apply Complex.abs_exp_ofReal_mul_I _ = 3 := by norm_num . rw [mul_comm, ←neg_mul, mul_comm] norm_cast apply lower_secant_bound . simp only [neg_mul, Set.mem_Icc, neg_add_le_iff_le_add, le_add_neg_iff_add_le, neg_le_sub_iff_le_add] constructor <;> linarith [Real.two_le_pi, Real.two_pi_pos] . rw [abs_neg, le_abs] left rcases ht with ht | ht <;> linarith [ht.1] _ = (MeasureTheory.volume (Ξ™ y' y)).toReal * (3 / ((y / 2) / 2) ^ 2) := by apply MeasureTheory.setIntegral_const _ = |y - y'| * (3 / ((y / 2) / 2) ^ 2) := by congr rw [Real.volume_uIoc, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (abs_nonneg (y - y'))] _ = (3 * (2 * 2) ^ 2) * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) := by ring _ ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) := by gcongr norm_num
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– ≀ 2 ^ 6 * (1 / y) * (|y - y'| / y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [Set.mem_uIcc] at ht
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ d t β‰  0
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ⊒ d t β‰  0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ d t β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
have ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 := by rcases ht with ht | ht <;> (constructor <;> linarith)
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ⊒ d t β‰  0
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ d t β‰  0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ⊒ d t β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [ddef]
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ d t β‰  0
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t β‰  0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ d t β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
simp
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t β‰  0
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ Β¬1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [←norm_eq_zero]
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ Β¬1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = 0
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ Β¬β€–1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).expβ€– = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ Β¬1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply ne_of_gt
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ Β¬β€–1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).expβ€– = 0
case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 < β€–1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).expβ€–
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ Β¬β€–1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).expβ€– = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
calc β€–1 - Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))β€– _ β‰₯ |(1 - Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t))).im| := by simp only [Complex.norm_eq_abs, ge_iff_le] apply Complex.abs_im_le_abs _ = Real.sin t := by simp rw [Complex.exp_im] simp apply Real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi . linarith . linarith [Real.two_le_pi] _ > 0 := by apply Real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi . linarith . linarith [Real.two_le_pi]
case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 < β€–1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).expβ€–
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 < β€–1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).expβ€– TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rcases ht with ht | ht <;> (constructor <;> linarith)
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ⊒ 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ⊒ 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
constructor <;> linarith
case inr y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ⊒ 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ⊒ 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
simp only [Complex.norm_eq_abs, ge_iff_le]
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ β€–1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).expβ€– β‰₯ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im|
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im| ≀ Complex.abs (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ β€–1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).expβ€– β‰₯ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im| TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Complex.abs_im_le_abs
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im| ≀ Complex.abs (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im| ≀ Complex.abs (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
simp
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im| = t.sin
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp.im| = t.sin
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp).im| = t.sin TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [Complex.exp_im]
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp.im| = t.sin
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(-(Complex.I * ↑t)).re.exp * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).im.sin| = t.sin
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp.im| = t.sin TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
simp
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(-(Complex.I * ↑t)).re.exp * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).im.sin| = t.sin
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 ≀ t.sin
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ |(-(Complex.I * ↑t)).re.exp * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).im.sin| = t.sin TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Real.sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 ≀ t.sin
case h0x y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 ≀ t case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t ≀ Real.pi
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 ≀ t.sin TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. linarith
case h0x y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 ≀ t case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t ≀ Real.pi
case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t ≀ Real.pi
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h0x y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 ≀ t case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t ≀ Real.pi TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. linarith [Real.two_le_pi]
case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t ≀ Real.pi
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t ≀ Real.pi TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
linarith
case h0x y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 ≀ t
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h0x y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 ≀ t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
linarith [Real.two_le_pi]
case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t ≀ Real.pi
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t ≀ Real.pi TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t.sin > 0
case h0x y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 < t case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t < Real.pi
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t.sin > 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. linarith
case h0x y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 < t case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t < Real.pi
case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t < Real.pi
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h0x y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 < t case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t < Real.pi TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. linarith [Real.two_le_pi]
case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t < Real.pi
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t < Real.pi TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
linarith
case h0x y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 < t
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h0x y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ 0 < t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
linarith [Real.two_le_pi]
case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t < Real.pi
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hxp y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp t : ℝ ht : y' ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y ∨ y ≀ t ∧ t ≀ y' ht' : 0 < t ∧ t ≀ 1 ⊒ t < Real.pi TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
intro t ht
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 ⊒ βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 ⊒ βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
have : f = fun t ↦ c t / d t := by simp
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t ⊒ HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ HasDerivAt f (f' t) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [this]
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t ⊒ HasDerivAt f (f' t) t
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => c t / d t) (f' t) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t ⊒ HasDerivAt f (f' t) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
have : f' = fun t ↦ ((c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2) := by ext t rw [f'def, cdef, c'def, ddef, d'def] simp congr ring
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => c t / d t) (f' t) t
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => c t / d t) (f' t) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => c t / d t) (f' t) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [this]
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => c t / d t) (f' t) t
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => c t / d t) ((fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2) t) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => c t / d t) (f' t) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply HasDerivAt.div
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => c t / d t) ((fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2) t) t
case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => c y) (c' t) t case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => d y) (d' t) t case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => c t / d t) ((fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2) t) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. rw [cdef, c'def] simp apply HasDerivAt.const_sub apply HasDerivAt.ofReal_comp apply hasDerivAt_id'
case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => c y) (c' t) t case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => d y) (d' t) t case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0
case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => d y) (d' t) t case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => c y) (c' t) t case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => d y) (d' t) t case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. rw [ddef, d'def] simp rw [←neg_neg (Complex.I * Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t)))] apply HasDerivAt.const_sub rw [←neg_mul, mul_comm] apply HasDerivAt.cexp apply HasDerivAt.neg conv in fun (x : ℝ) ↦ Complex.I * (x : ℝ) => ext rw [mul_comm] set e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t ↦ t * Complex.I with edef have : (fun (t : ℝ) ↦ t * Complex.I) = fun (t : ℝ) ↦ e t := by rw [edef] rw [this] apply HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal rw [edef] apply hasDerivAt_mul_const
case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => d y) (d' t) t case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0
case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => d y) (d' t) t case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. exact d_nonzero ht
case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
simp
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ f = fun t => c t / d t
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ f = fun t => c t / d t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
ext t
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t ⊒ f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2
case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ f' t = (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t ⊒ f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [f'def, cdef, c'def, ddef, d'def]
case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ f' t = (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2
case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ (fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) t = ((fun t => -1) t * (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t - (fun t => 1 - ↑t) t * (fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t) / (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t ^ 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ f' t = (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
simp
case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ (fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) t = ((fun t => -1) t * (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t - (fun t => 1 - ↑t) t * (fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t) / (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t ^ 2
case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 = ((-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp - 1 - (1 - ↑t) * (Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ (fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) t = ((fun t => -1) t * (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t - (fun t => 1 - ↑t) t * (fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t) / (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t ^ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
congr
case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 = ((-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp - 1 - (1 - ↑t) * (Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
case h.e_a y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp - 1 - (1 - ↑t) * (Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 = ((-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp - 1 - (1 - ↑t) * (Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
ring
case h.e_a y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp - 1 - (1 - ↑t) * (Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.e_a y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t✝ : ℝ ht : t✝ ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this : f = fun t => c t / d t t : ℝ ⊒ -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp - 1 - (1 - ↑t) * (Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [cdef, c'def]
case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => c y) (c' t) t
case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => (fun t => 1 - ↑t) y) ((fun t => -1) t) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => c y) (c' t) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
simp
case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => (fun t => 1 - ↑t) y) ((fun t => -1) t) t
case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => 1 - ↑y) (-1) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => (fun t => 1 - ↑t) y) ((fun t => -1) t) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply HasDerivAt.const_sub
case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => 1 - ↑y) (-1) t
case hc.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x) 1 t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hc y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => 1 - ↑y) (-1) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply HasDerivAt.ofReal_comp
case hc.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x) 1 t
case hc.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => y) 1 t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hc.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x) 1 t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply hasDerivAt_id'
case hc.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => y) 1 t
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hc.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => y) 1 t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [ddef, d'def]
case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => d y) (d' t) t
case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) y) ((fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => d y) (d' t) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
simp
case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) y) ((fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t) t
case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) (Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => (fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) y) ((fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [←neg_neg (Complex.I * Complex.exp (-(Complex.I * ↑t)))]
case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) (Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t
case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) (- -(Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) (Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply HasDerivAt.const_sub
case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) (- -(Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)) t
case hd.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) (-(Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun y => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) (- -(Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [←neg_mul, mul_comm]
case hd.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) (-(Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)) t
case hd.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ((-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp * -Complex.I) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) (-(Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp)) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply HasDerivAt.cexp
case hd.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ((-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp * -Complex.I) t
case hd.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => -(Complex.I * ↑x)) (-Complex.I) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ((-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp * -Complex.I) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply HasDerivAt.neg
case hd.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => -(Complex.I * ↑x)) (-Complex.I) t
case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => Complex.I * ↑x) Complex.I t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => -(Complex.I * ↑x)) (-Complex.I) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
conv in fun (x : ℝ) ↦ Complex.I * (x : ℝ) => ext rw [mul_comm]
case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => Complex.I * ↑x) Complex.I t
case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x * Complex.I) Complex.I t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => Complex.I * ↑x) Complex.I t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
set e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t ↦ t * Complex.I with edef
case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x * Complex.I) Complex.I t
case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x * Complex.I) Complex.I t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x * Complex.I) Complex.I t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
have : (fun (t : ℝ) ↦ t * Complex.I) = fun (t : ℝ) ↦ e t := by rw [edef]
case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x * Complex.I) Complex.I t
case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x * Complex.I) Complex.I t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x * Complex.I) Complex.I t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [this]
case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x * Complex.I) Complex.I t
case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => e ↑t) Complex.I t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun x => ↑x * Complex.I) Complex.I t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal
case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => e ↑t) Complex.I t
case hd.hf.hf.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt e Complex.I ↑t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd.hf.hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => e ↑t) Complex.I t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [edef]
case hd.hf.hf.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt e Complex.I ↑t
case hd.hf.hf.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => t * Complex.I) Complex.I ↑t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd.hf.hf.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt e Complex.I ↑t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply hasDerivAt_mul_const
case hd.hf.hf.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => t * Complex.I) Complex.I ↑t
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hd.hf.hf.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝¹ : f = fun t => c t / d t this✝ : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I this : (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t ⊒ HasDerivAt (fun t => t * Complex.I) Complex.I ↑t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [edef]
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I ⊒ (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 e : β„‚ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => t * Complex.I edef : e = fun t => t * Complex.I ⊒ (fun t => ↑t * Complex.I) = fun t => e ↑t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
exact d_nonzero ht
case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hx y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y this✝ : f = fun t => c t / d t this : f' = fun t => (c' t * d t - c t * d' t) / d t ^ 2 ⊒ d t β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply ContinuousOn.div
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y)
case hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) (Set.uIcc y' y) case hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) (Set.uIcc y' y) case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. apply Continuous.continuousOn continuity
case hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) (Set.uIcc y' y) case hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) (Set.uIcc y' y) case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0
case hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) (Set.uIcc y' y) case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) (Set.uIcc y' y) case hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) (Set.uIcc y' y) case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. apply Continuous.continuousOn apply Continuous.pow apply Continuous.sub . apply continuous_const . apply Continuous.cexp apply Continuous.neg apply Continuous.mul . apply continuous_const . apply Complex.continuous_ofReal
case hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) (Set.uIcc y' y) case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0
case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) (Set.uIcc y' y) case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. intro t ht simp apply d_nonzero ht
case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Continuous.continuousOn
case hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) (Set.uIcc y' y)
case hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun t => -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) (Set.uIcc y' y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
continuity
case hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun t => -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hf.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun t => -1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Continuous.continuousOn
case hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) (Set.uIcc y' y)
case hg.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ ContinuousOn (fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2) (Set.uIcc y' y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Continuous.pow
case hg.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2
case hg.h.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun b => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑b)).exp
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun t => (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Continuous.sub
case hg.h.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun b => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑b)).exp
case hg.h.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => 1 case hg.h.h.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun b => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑b)).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. apply continuous_const
case hg.h.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => 1 case hg.h.h.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp
case hg.h.h.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => 1 case hg.h.h.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. apply Continuous.cexp apply Continuous.neg apply Continuous.mul . apply continuous_const . apply Complex.continuous_ofReal
case hg.h.h.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply continuous_const
case hg.h.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Continuous.cexp
case hg.h.h.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp
case hg.h.h.hg.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun y => -(Complex.I * ↑y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Continuous.neg
case hg.h.h.hg.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun y => -(Complex.I * ↑y)
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => Complex.I * ↑x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h.hg.h y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun y => -(Complex.I * ↑y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Continuous.mul
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => Complex.I * ↑x
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => Complex.I case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => ↑x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => Complex.I * ↑x TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. apply continuous_const
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => Complex.I case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => ↑x
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => ↑x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => Complex.I case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => ↑x TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. apply Complex.continuous_ofReal
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => ↑x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => ↑x TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply continuous_const
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => Complex.I
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hf y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => Complex.I TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply Complex.continuous_ofReal
case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => ↑x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hg.h.h.hg.h.hf.hg y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ Continuous fun x => ↑x TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
intro t ht
case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0
case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑x)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
simp
case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0
case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ Β¬1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 β‰  0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply d_nonzero ht
case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ Β¬1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hβ‚€ y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t t : ℝ ht : t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y ⊒ Β¬1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
simp
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– = β€–f y - f y'β€–
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–(1 - ↑y) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y)).exp) - (1 - ↑y') / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑y')).exp)β€– = β€–f y - f y'β€– TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
congr 1
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–f y - f y'β€– = β€–βˆ« (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' tβ€–
case e_a y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ f y - f y' = ∫ (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–f y - f y'β€– = β€–βˆ« (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' tβ€– TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt]
case e_a y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ f y - f y' = ∫ (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' t
case e_a.hderiv y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x case e_a.hint y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ IntervalIntegrable (fun t => f' t) MeasureTheory.volume y' y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ f y - f y' = ∫ (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' t TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. exact f_deriv
case e_a.hderiv y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x case e_a.hint y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ IntervalIntegrable (fun t => f' t) MeasureTheory.volume y' y
case e_a.hint y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ IntervalIntegrable (fun t => f' t) MeasureTheory.volume y' y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a.hderiv y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x case e_a.hint y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ IntervalIntegrable (fun t => f' t) MeasureTheory.volume y' y TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
. apply f'_cont.intervalIntegrable
case e_a.hint y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ IntervalIntegrable (fun t => f' t) MeasureTheory.volume y' y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a.hint y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ IntervalIntegrable (fun t => f' t) MeasureTheory.volume y' y TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
exact f_deriv
case e_a.hderiv y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a.hderiv y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ βˆ€ x ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply f'_cont.intervalIntegrable
case e_a.hint y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ IntervalIntegrable (fun t => f' t) MeasureTheory.volume y' y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case e_a.hint y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ IntervalIntegrable (fun t => f' t) MeasureTheory.volume y' y TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply intervalIntegral.norm_intervalIntegral_eq
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–βˆ« (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' tβ€– = β€–βˆ« (t : ℝ) in Ξ™ y' y, f' tβ€–
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–βˆ« (t : ℝ) in y'..y, f' tβ€– = β€–βˆ« (t : ℝ) in Ξ™ y' y, f' tβ€– TACTIC:
https://github.com/fpvandoorn/carleson.git
6d448ddfa1ff78506367ab09a8caac5351011ead
Carleson/Theorem1_1/Hilbert_kernel.lean
Hilbert_kernel_regularity_main_part
[100, 1]
[259, 15]
apply MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_integral_norm
y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–βˆ« (t : ℝ) in Ξ™ y' y, f' tβ€– ≀ ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ξ™ y' y, β€–f' tβ€–
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: y y' : ℝ yy'nonneg : 0 ≀ y ∧ 0 ≀ y' ypos : 0 < y y2ley' : y / 2 ≀ y' hy : y ≀ 1 hy' : y' ≀ 1 f : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (1 - ↑t) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) f' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 f'def : f' = fun t => (-1 + (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp + Complex.I * (↑t - 1) * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) / (1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp) ^ 2 c : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - ↑t cdef : c = fun t => 1 - ↑t c' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => -1 c'def : c' = fun t => -1 d : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp ddef : d = fun t => 1 - (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d' : ℝ β†’ β„‚ := fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d'def : d' = fun t => Complex.I * (-(Complex.I * ↑t)).exp d_nonzero : βˆ€ {t : ℝ}, t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y β†’ d t β‰  0 f_deriv : βˆ€ t ∈ Set.uIcc y' y, HasDerivAt f (f' t) t f'_cont : ContinuousOn (fun t => f' t) (Set.uIcc y' y) ⊒ β€–βˆ« (t : ℝ) in Ξ™ y' y, f' tβ€– ≀ ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ξ™ y' y, β€–f' tβ€– TACTIC: