url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CompHaus/ExplicitSheaves.lean
CompHaus.final
[354, 1]
[363, 16]
exact hF' E
case hFecs A : Type (u + 2) inst✝ : Category A F : CompHausᵒᵖ ⥤ A hF : PreservesFiniteProducts F hF' : ∀ (E : A), EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj E.op) E : A B : CompHaus S : Presieve B hS : S ∈ Coverage.covering (ExtensiveRegularCoverage' CompHaus (_ : ∀ {X Y Z : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (π : Z ⟶ X) [inst : Epi π], Epi Limits.pullback.fst) (_ : ∀ {α : Type} [inst : Fintype α] {X : CompHaus} {Z : α → CompHaus} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) {Y : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : IsIso (Sigma.desc π)), IsIso (Sigma.desc fun x_1 => Limits.pullback.fst))) B ⊢ EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj E.op)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case hFecs A : Type (u + 2) inst✝ : Category A F : CompHausᵒᵖ ⥤ A hF : PreservesFiniteProducts F hF' : ∀ (E : A), EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj E.op) E : A B : CompHaus S : Presieve B hS : S ∈ Coverage.covering (ExtensiveRegularCoverage' CompHaus (_ : ∀ {X Y Z : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (π : Z ⟶ X) [inst : Epi π], Epi Limits.pullback.fst) (_ : ∀ {α : Type} [inst : Fintype α] {X : CompHaus} {Z : α → CompHaus} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) {Y : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : IsIso (Sigma.desc π)), IsIso (Sigma.desc fun x_1 => Limits.pullback.fst))) B ⊢ EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ coyoneda.obj E.op) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CompHaus/ExplicitSheaves.lean
CompHaus.final'
[365, 1]
[373, 38]
rw [Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_forget (coherentTopology CompHaus) F G, isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type, ← extensiveRegular_generates_coherent, Presieve.isSheaf_coverage]
A : Type (u + 2) inst✝³ : Category A G : A ⥤ Type (u + 1) inst✝² : HasLimits A inst✝¹ : PreservesLimits G inst✝ : ReflectsIsomorphisms G F : CompHausᵒᵖ ⥤ A hF : PreservesFiniteProducts (F ⋙ G) hF' : EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ G) ⊢ Presheaf.IsSheaf (coherentTopology CompHaus) F
A : Type (u + 2) inst✝³ : Category A G : A ⥤ Type (u + 1) inst✝² : HasLimits A inst✝¹ : PreservesLimits G inst✝ : ReflectsIsomorphisms G F : CompHausᵒᵖ ⥤ A hF : PreservesFiniteProducts (F ⋙ G) hF' : EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ G) ⊢ ∀ {X : CompHaus} (R : Presieve X), R ∈ Coverage.covering (ExtensiveRegularCoverage' CompHaus (_ : ∀ {X Y Z : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (π : Z ⟶ X) [inst : Epi π], Epi Limits.pullback.fst) (_ : ∀ {α : Type} [inst : Fintype α] {X : CompHaus} {Z : α → CompHaus} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) {Y : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : IsIso (Sigma.desc π)), IsIso (Sigma.desc fun x_1 => Limits.pullback.fst))) X → IsSheafFor (F ⋙ G) R
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: A : Type (u + 2) inst✝³ : Category A G : A ⥤ Type (u + 1) inst✝² : HasLimits A inst✝¹ : PreservesLimits G inst✝ : ReflectsIsomorphisms G F : CompHausᵒᵖ ⥤ A hF : PreservesFiniteProducts (F ⋙ G) hF' : EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ G) ⊢ Presheaf.IsSheaf (coherentTopology CompHaus) F TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CompHaus/ExplicitSheaves.lean
CompHaus.final'
[365, 1]
[373, 38]
intro B S' hS
A : Type (u + 2) inst✝³ : Category A G : A ⥤ Type (u + 1) inst✝² : HasLimits A inst✝¹ : PreservesLimits G inst✝ : ReflectsIsomorphisms G F : CompHausᵒᵖ ⥤ A hF : PreservesFiniteProducts (F ⋙ G) hF' : EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ G) ⊢ ∀ {X : CompHaus} (R : Presieve X), R ∈ Coverage.covering (ExtensiveRegularCoverage' CompHaus (_ : ∀ {X Y Z : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (π : Z ⟶ X) [inst : Epi π], Epi Limits.pullback.fst) (_ : ∀ {α : Type} [inst : Fintype α] {X : CompHaus} {Z : α → CompHaus} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) {Y : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : IsIso (Sigma.desc π)), IsIso (Sigma.desc fun x_1 => Limits.pullback.fst))) X → IsSheafFor (F ⋙ G) R
A : Type (u + 2) inst✝³ : Category A G : A ⥤ Type (u + 1) inst✝² : HasLimits A inst✝¹ : PreservesLimits G inst✝ : ReflectsIsomorphisms G F : CompHausᵒᵖ ⥤ A hF : PreservesFiniteProducts (F ⋙ G) hF' : EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ G) B : CompHaus S' : Presieve B hS : S' ∈ Coverage.covering (ExtensiveRegularCoverage' CompHaus (_ : ∀ {X Y Z : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (π : Z ⟶ X) [inst : Epi π], Epi Limits.pullback.fst) (_ : ∀ {α : Type} [inst : Fintype α] {X : CompHaus} {Z : α → CompHaus} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) {Y : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : IsIso (Sigma.desc π)), IsIso (Sigma.desc fun x_1 => Limits.pullback.fst))) B ⊢ IsSheafFor (F ⋙ G) S'
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: A : Type (u + 2) inst✝³ : Category A G : A ⥤ Type (u + 1) inst✝² : HasLimits A inst✝¹ : PreservesLimits G inst✝ : ReflectsIsomorphisms G F : CompHausᵒᵖ ⥤ A hF : PreservesFiniteProducts (F ⋙ G) hF' : EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ G) ⊢ ∀ {X : CompHaus} (R : Presieve X), R ∈ Coverage.covering (ExtensiveRegularCoverage' CompHaus (_ : ∀ {X Y Z : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (π : Z ⟶ X) [inst : Epi π], Epi Limits.pullback.fst) (_ : ∀ {α : Type} [inst : Fintype α] {X : CompHaus} {Z : α → CompHaus} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) {Y : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : IsIso (Sigma.desc π)), IsIso (Sigma.desc fun x_1 => Limits.pullback.fst))) X → IsSheafFor (F ⋙ G) R TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CompHaus/ExplicitSheaves.lean
CompHaus.final'
[365, 1]
[373, 38]
exact isSheafFor_of_Dagur hS hF hF'
A : Type (u + 2) inst✝³ : Category A G : A ⥤ Type (u + 1) inst✝² : HasLimits A inst✝¹ : PreservesLimits G inst✝ : ReflectsIsomorphisms G F : CompHausᵒᵖ ⥤ A hF : PreservesFiniteProducts (F ⋙ G) hF' : EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ G) B : CompHaus S' : Presieve B hS : S' ∈ Coverage.covering (ExtensiveRegularCoverage' CompHaus (_ : ∀ {X Y Z : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (π : Z ⟶ X) [inst : Epi π], Epi Limits.pullback.fst) (_ : ∀ {α : Type} [inst : Fintype α] {X : CompHaus} {Z : α → CompHaus} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) {Y : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : IsIso (Sigma.desc π)), IsIso (Sigma.desc fun x_1 => Limits.pullback.fst))) B ⊢ IsSheafFor (F ⋙ G) S'
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: A : Type (u + 2) inst✝³ : Category A G : A ⥤ Type (u + 1) inst✝² : HasLimits A inst✝¹ : PreservesLimits G inst✝ : ReflectsIsomorphisms G F : CompHausᵒᵖ ⥤ A hF : PreservesFiniteProducts (F ⋙ G) hF' : EqualizerCondition (F ⋙ G) B : CompHaus S' : Presieve B hS : S' ∈ Coverage.covering (ExtensiveRegularCoverage' CompHaus (_ : ∀ {X Y Z : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (π : Z ⟶ X) [inst : Epi π], Epi Limits.pullback.fst) (_ : ∀ {α : Type} [inst : Fintype α] {X : CompHaus} {Z : α → CompHaus} (π : (a : α) → Z a ⟶ X) {Y : CompHaus} (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : IsIso (Sigma.desc π)), IsIso (Sigma.desc fun x_1 => Limits.pullback.fst))) B ⊢ IsSheafFor (F ⋙ G) S' TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TopCat.isOpen_iso
[16, 1]
[23, 13]
let ff := TopCat.homeoOfIso f
X Y : TopCat U : Set ↑X f : X ≅ Y h : IsOpen U ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U)
X Y : TopCat U : Set ↑X f : X ≅ Y h : IsOpen U ff : ↑X ≃ₜ ↑Y := homeoOfIso f ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X Y : TopCat U : Set ↑X f : X ≅ Y h : IsOpen U ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TopCat.isOpen_iso
[16, 1]
[23, 13]
rw [← Homeomorph.isOpen_image ff] at h
X Y : TopCat U : Set ↑X f : X ≅ Y h : IsOpen U ff : ↑X ≃ₜ ↑Y := homeoOfIso f ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U)
X Y : TopCat U : Set ↑X f : X ≅ Y ff : ↑X ≃ₜ ↑Y := homeoOfIso f h : IsOpen (↑ff '' U) ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X Y : TopCat U : Set ↑X f : X ≅ Y h : IsOpen U ff : ↑X ≃ₜ ↑Y := homeoOfIso f ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TopCat.isOpen_iso
[16, 1]
[23, 13]
assumption
X Y : TopCat U : Set ↑X f : X ≅ Y ff : ↑X ≃ₜ ↑Y := homeoOfIso f h : IsOpen (↑ff '' U) ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X Y : TopCat U : Set ↑X f : X ≅ Y ff : ↑X ≃ₜ ↑Y := homeoOfIso f h : IsOpen (↑ff '' U) ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
have surj' : Function.Surjective f.hom
X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y
case surj' X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y ⊢ Function.Surjective ↑f.hom X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
have inj' : Function.Injective f.hom
X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y
case inj' X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom ⊢ Function.Injective ↑f.hom X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
constructor
X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom ⊢ IsTotallyDisconnected Set.univ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
unfold _root_.IsTotallyDisconnected
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom ⊢ IsTotallyDisconnected Set.univ
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom ⊢ ∀ (t : Set ↑Y), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom ⊢ IsTotallyDisconnected Set.univ TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
intro t _ ht₂
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom ⊢ ∀ (t : Set ↑Y), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t ⊢ Set.Subsingleton t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom ⊢ ∀ (t : Set ↑Y), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
apply Set.subsingleton_of_preimage surj'
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t ⊢ Set.Subsingleton t
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t ⊢ Set.Subsingleton (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t ⊢ Set.Subsingleton t TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
replace k := k.isTotallyDisconnected_univ
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t ⊢ Set.Subsingleton (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t)
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : IsTotallyDisconnected Set.univ ⊢ Set.Subsingleton (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t ⊢ Set.Subsingleton (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
unfold _root_.IsTotallyDisconnected at k
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : IsTotallyDisconnected Set.univ ⊢ Set.Subsingleton (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t)
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ Set.Subsingleton (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : IsTotallyDisconnected Set.univ ⊢ Set.Subsingleton (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
apply k
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ Set.Subsingleton (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t)
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ ↑f.hom ⁻¹' t ⊆ Set.univ case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsPreconnected (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ Set.Subsingleton (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
tauto
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ ↑f.hom ⁻¹' t ⊆ Set.univ case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsPreconnected (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t)
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsPreconnected (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ ↑f.hom ⁻¹' t ⊆ Set.univ case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsPreconnected (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
apply IsPreconnected.preimage_of_open_map
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsPreconnected (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t)
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hs X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsPreconnected t case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hinj X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ Function.Injective ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsOpenMap ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hsf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ t ⊆ Set.range ↑f.hom
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsPreconnected (↑f.hom ⁻¹' t) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
assumption
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hs X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsPreconnected t case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hinj X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ Function.Injective ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsOpenMap ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hsf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ t ⊆ Set.range ↑f.hom
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hinj X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ Function.Injective ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsOpenMap ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hsf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ t ⊆ Set.range ↑f.hom
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hs X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsPreconnected t case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hinj X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ Function.Injective ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsOpenMap ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hsf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ t ⊆ Set.range ↑f.hom TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
assumption
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hinj X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ Function.Injective ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsOpenMap ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hsf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ t ⊆ Set.range ↑f.hom
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsOpenMap ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hsf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ t ⊆ Set.range ↑f.hom
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hinj X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ Function.Injective ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsOpenMap ↑f.hom case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hsf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ t ⊆ Set.range ↑f.hom TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
tauto
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hsf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ t ⊆ Set.range ↑f.hom
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hsf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ t ⊆ Set.range ↑f.hom TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
apply (TopCat.homeoOfIso f).surjective
case surj' X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y ⊢ Function.Surjective ↑f.hom
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case surj' X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y ⊢ Function.Surjective ↑f.hom TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
apply (TopCat.homeoOfIso f).injective
case inj' X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom ⊢ Function.Injective ↑f.hom
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inj' X Y : TopCat k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom ⊢ Function.Injective ↑f.hom TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
unfold IsOpenMap
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsOpenMap ↑f.hom
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ ∀ (U : Set ↑X), IsOpen U → IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ IsOpenMap ↑f.hom TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
intro U hU
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ ∀ (U : Set ↑X), IsOpen U → IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U)
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t U : Set ↑X hU : IsOpen U ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t ⊢ ∀ (U : Set ↑X), IsOpen U → IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso
[25, 1]
[57, 8]
apply TopCat.isOpen_iso _ hU
case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t U : Set ↑X hU : IsOpen U ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case isTotallyDisconnected_univ.hs.a.hf X Y : TopCat f : X ≅ Y surj' : Function.Surjective ↑f.hom inj' : Function.Injective ↑f.hom t : Set ↑Y a✝ : t ⊆ Set.univ ht₂ : IsPreconnected t k : ∀ (t : Set ↑X), t ⊆ Set.univ → IsPreconnected t → Set.Subsingleton t U : Set ↑X hU : IsOpen U ⊢ IsOpen (↑f.hom '' U) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.finiteCoproduct.hom_ext
[103, 1]
[108, 10]
ext ⟨a,x⟩
α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B h : ∀ (a : α), ι X a ≫ f = ι X a ≫ g ⊢ f = g
case w.mk α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B h : ∀ (a : α), ι X a ≫ f = ι X a ≫ g a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop ⊢ ↑f { fst := a, snd := x } = ↑g { fst := a, snd := x }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B h : ∀ (a : α), ι X a ≫ f = ι X a ≫ g ⊢ f = g TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.finiteCoproduct.hom_ext
[103, 1]
[108, 10]
specialize h a
case w.mk α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B h : ∀ (a : α), ι X a ≫ f = ι X a ≫ g a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop ⊢ ↑f { fst := a, snd := x } = ↑g { fst := a, snd := x }
case w.mk α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop h : ι X a ≫ f = ι X a ≫ g ⊢ ↑f { fst := a, snd := x } = ↑g { fst := a, snd := x }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case w.mk α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B h : ∀ (a : α), ι X a ≫ f = ι X a ≫ g a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop ⊢ ↑f { fst := a, snd := x } = ↑g { fst := a, snd := x } TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.finiteCoproduct.hom_ext
[103, 1]
[108, 10]
apply_fun (fun q => q x) at h
case w.mk α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop h : ι X a ≫ f = ι X a ≫ g ⊢ ↑f { fst := a, snd := x } = ↑g { fst := a, snd := x }
case w.mk α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(ι X a ≫ f) x = ↑(ι X a ≫ g) x ⊢ ↑f { fst := a, snd := x } = ↑g { fst := a, snd := x }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case w.mk α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop h : ι X a ≫ f = ι X a ≫ g ⊢ ↑f { fst := a, snd := x } = ↑g { fst := a, snd := x } TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.finiteCoproduct.hom_ext
[103, 1]
[108, 10]
exact h
case w.mk α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(ι X a ≫ f) x = ↑(ι X a ≫ g) x ⊢ ↑f { fst := a, snd := x } = ↑g { fst := a, snd := x }
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case w.mk α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α X : α → Profinite B : Profinite f g : finiteCoproduct X ⟶ B a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(ι X a ≫ f) x = ↑(ι X a ≫ g) x ⊢ ↑f { fst := a, snd := x } = ↑g { fst := a, snd := x } TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_continuous
[213, 1]
[217, 25]
apply Continuous.quotient_lift
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ Continuous (ιFun π)
case h X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ Continuous fun x => match x with | { fst := a, snd := x } => ↑(π a) x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ Continuous (ιFun π) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_continuous
[213, 1]
[217, 25]
apply continuous_sigma
case h X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ Continuous fun x => match x with | { fst := a, snd := x } => ↑(π a) x
case h.hf X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ ∀ (i : α), Continuous fun a => match { fst := i, snd := a } with | { fst := a, snd := x } => ↑(π a) x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ Continuous fun x => match x with | { fst := a, snd := x } => ↑(π a) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_continuous
[213, 1]
[217, 25]
intro a
case h.hf X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ ∀ (i : α), Continuous fun a => match { fst := i, snd := a } with | { fst := a, snd := x } => ↑(π a) x
case h.hf X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α ⊢ Continuous fun a_1 => match { fst := a, snd := a_1 } with | { fst := a, snd := x } => ↑(π a) x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.hf X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ ∀ (i : α), Continuous fun a => match { fst := i, snd := a } with | { fst := a, snd := x } => ↑(π a) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_continuous
[213, 1]
[217, 25]
exact (π a).continuous
case h.hf X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α ⊢ Continuous fun a_1 => match { fst := a, snd := a_1 } with | { fst := a, snd := x } => ↑(π a) x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.hf X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α ⊢ Continuous fun a_1 => match { fst := a, snd := a_1 } with | { fst := a, snd := x } => ↑(π a) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_injective
[219, 1]
[223, 23]
rintro ⟨⟨a,x⟩⟩ ⟨⟨b,y⟩⟩ (h : π _ _ = π _ _)
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ Function.Injective (ιFun π)
case mk.mk.mk.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y ⊢ Quot.mk Setoid.r { fst := a, snd := x } = Quot.mk Setoid.r { fst := b, snd := y }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ Function.Injective (ιFun π) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_injective
[219, 1]
[223, 23]
apply Quotient.sound'
case mk.mk.mk.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y ⊢ Quot.mk Setoid.r { fst := a, snd := x } = Quot.mk Setoid.r { fst := b, snd := y }
case mk.mk.mk.mk.a X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y ⊢ Setoid.r { fst := a, snd := x } { fst := b, snd := y }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mk.mk.mk.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y ⊢ Quot.mk Setoid.r { fst := a, snd := x } = Quot.mk Setoid.r { fst := b, snd := y } TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_injective
[219, 1]
[223, 23]
refine ⟨pullback (π a) (π b), ⟨⟨x,y⟩,h⟩, pullback.fst _ _, pullback.snd _ _, ?_, rfl, rfl⟩
case mk.mk.mk.mk.a X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y ⊢ Setoid.r { fst := a, snd := x } { fst := b, snd := y }
case mk.mk.mk.mk.a X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y ⊢ pullback.fst (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := a, snd := x }.fst = pullback.snd (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := b, snd := y }.fst
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mk.mk.mk.mk.a X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y ⊢ Setoid.r { fst := a, snd := x } { fst := b, snd := y } TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_injective
[219, 1]
[223, 23]
ext ⟨_, h⟩
case mk.mk.mk.mk.a X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y ⊢ pullback.fst (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := a, snd := x }.fst = pullback.snd (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := b, snd := y }.fst
case mk.mk.mk.mk.a.w.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h✝ : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y val✝ : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop × ↑(X b).toCompHaus.toTop h : val✝ ∈ {xy | ↑(π a) xy.fst = ↑(π b) xy.snd} ⊢ ↑(pullback.fst (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := a, snd := x }.fst) { val := val✝, property := h } = ↑(pullback.snd (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := b, snd := y }.fst) { val := val✝, property := h }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mk.mk.mk.mk.a X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y ⊢ pullback.fst (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := a, snd := x }.fst = pullback.snd (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := b, snd := y }.fst TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_injective
[219, 1]
[223, 23]
exact h
case mk.mk.mk.mk.a.w.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h✝ : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y val✝ : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop × ↑(X b).toCompHaus.toTop h : val✝ ∈ {xy | ↑(π a) xy.fst = ↑(π b) xy.snd} ⊢ ↑(pullback.fst (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := a, snd := x }.fst) { val := val✝, property := h } = ↑(pullback.snd (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := b, snd := y }.fst) { val := val✝, property := h }
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mk.mk.mk.mk.a.w.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a₁✝ : Quotient (relation π) a : α x : ↑((fun a => X a) a).toCompHaus.toTop a₂✝ : Quotient (relation π) b : α y : ↑((fun a => X a) b).toCompHaus.toTop h✝ : ↑(π a) x = ↑(π b) y val✝ : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop × ↑(X b).toCompHaus.toTop h : val✝ ∈ {xy | ↑(π a) xy.fst = ↑(π b) xy.snd} ⊢ ↑(pullback.fst (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := a, snd := x }.fst) { val := val✝, property := h } = ↑(pullback.snd (π a) (π b) ≫ π { fst := b, snd := y }.fst) { val := val✝, property := h } TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_surjective
[225, 1]
[228, 34]
intro b
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ Function.Surjective (ιFun π)
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop ⊢ ∃ a, ιFun π a = b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ Function.Surjective (ιFun π) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_surjective
[225, 1]
[228, 34]
obtain ⟨a,x,h⟩ := surj b
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop ⊢ ∃ a, ιFun π a = b
case intro.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ ∃ a, ιFun π a = b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop ⊢ ∃ a, ιFun π a = b TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.ιFun_surjective
[225, 1]
[228, 34]
refine ⟨Quotient.mk _ ⟨a,x⟩, h⟩
case intro.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ ∃ a, ιFun π a = b
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop a : α x : ↑(X a).toCompHaus.toTop h : ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ ∃ a, ιFun π a = b TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.CompHaus.TotallyDisconnectedSpace_ofIsIso
[252, 1]
[257, 41]
have f : X.toTop ≅ Y.toTop
X✝¹ Y✝ B✝ : Profinite f✝ : X✝¹ ⟶ B✝ g : Y✝ ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X✝ : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X✝ a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b X Y : CompHaus k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X.toTop f : X ≅ Y ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y.toTop
case f X✝¹ Y✝ B✝ : Profinite f✝ : X✝¹ ⟶ B✝ g : Y✝ ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X✝ : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X✝ a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b X Y : CompHaus k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X.toTop f : X ≅ Y ⊢ X.toTop ≅ Y.toTop X✝¹ Y✝ B✝ : Profinite f✝¹ : X✝¹ ⟶ B✝ g : Y✝ ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X✝ : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X✝ a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b X Y : CompHaus k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X.toTop f✝ : X ≅ Y f : X.toTop ≅ Y.toTop ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y.toTop
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝¹ Y✝ B✝ : Profinite f✝ : X✝¹ ⟶ B✝ g : Y✝ ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X✝ : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X✝ a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b X Y : CompHaus k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X.toTop f : X ≅ Y ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y.toTop TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.CompHaus.TotallyDisconnectedSpace_ofIsIso
[252, 1]
[257, 41]
apply TotallyDisconnectedSpace.ofIso f
X✝¹ Y✝ B✝ : Profinite f✝¹ : X✝¹ ⟶ B✝ g : Y✝ ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X✝ : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X✝ a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b X Y : CompHaus k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X.toTop f✝ : X ≅ Y f : X.toTop ≅ Y.toTop ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y.toTop
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝¹ Y✝ B✝ : Profinite f✝¹ : X✝¹ ⟶ B✝ g : Y✝ ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X✝ : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X✝ a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b X Y : CompHaus k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X.toTop f✝ : X ≅ Y f : X.toTop ≅ Y.toTop ⊢ TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑Y.toTop TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.CompHaus.TotallyDisconnectedSpace_ofIsIso
[252, 1]
[257, 41]
exact compHausToTop.mapIso f
case f X✝¹ Y✝ B✝ : Profinite f✝ : X✝¹ ⟶ B✝ g : Y✝ ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X✝ : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X✝ a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b X Y : CompHaus k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X.toTop f : X ≅ Y ⊢ X.toTop ≅ Y.toTop
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case f X✝¹ Y✝ B✝ : Profinite f✝ : X✝¹ ⟶ B✝ g : Y✝ ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X✝ : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X✝ a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b X Y : CompHaus k : TotallyDisconnectedSpace ↑X.toTop f : X ≅ Y ⊢ X.toTop ≅ Y.toTop TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.π'_comp_ι_hom
[313, 1]
[316, 6]
ext
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α ⊢ π' π surj a ≫ (ι₂Iso π surj).hom = π a
case w X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α x✝ : (forget Profinite).obj (X a) ⊢ ↑(π' π surj a ≫ (ι₂Iso π surj).hom) x✝ = ↑(π a) x✝
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α ⊢ π' π surj a ≫ (ι₂Iso π surj).hom = π a TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.π'_comp_ι_hom
[313, 1]
[316, 6]
rfl
case w X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α x✝ : (forget Profinite).obj (X a) ⊢ ↑(π' π surj a ≫ (ι₂Iso π surj).hom) x✝ = ↑(π a) x✝
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case w X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α x✝ : (forget Profinite).obj (X a) ⊢ ↑(π' π surj a ≫ (ι₂Iso π surj).hom) x✝ = ↑(π a) x✝ TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.π_comp_ι_inv
[318, 1]
[321, 31]
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq]
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α ⊢ π a ≫ (ι₂Iso π surj).inv = π' π surj a
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α ⊢ π a = π' π surj a ≫ (ι₂Iso π surj).hom
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α ⊢ π a ≫ (ι₂Iso π surj).inv = π' π surj a TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.EffectiveEpiFamily.π_comp_ι_inv
[318, 1]
[321, 31]
exact π'_comp_ι_hom _ surj _
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α ⊢ π a = π' π surj a ≫ (ι₂Iso π surj).hom
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B surj : ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b a : α ⊢ π a = π' π surj a ≫ (ι₂Iso π surj).hom TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
tfae_have 1 → 2
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b]
case tfae_1_to_2 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B ⊢ EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b]
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b] TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
tfae_have 2 → 3
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b]
case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) ⊢ Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) tfae_2_to_3 : Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b]
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b] TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
tfae_have 3 → 1
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) tfae_2_to_3 : Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b]
case tfae_3_to_1 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) tfae_2_to_3 : Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ (∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b) → EffectiveEpiFamily X π X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) tfae_2_to_3 : Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b tfae_3_to_1 : (∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b) → EffectiveEpiFamily X π ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b]
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) tfae_2_to_3 : Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b] TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
tfae_finish
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) tfae_2_to_3 : Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b tfae_3_to_1 : (∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b) → EffectiveEpiFamily X π ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b]
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) tfae_2_to_3 : Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b tfae_3_to_1 : (∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b) → EffectiveEpiFamily X π ⊢ TFAE [EffectiveEpiFamily X π, Epi (Sigma.desc π), ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b] TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
intro
case tfae_1_to_2 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B ⊢ EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π)
case tfae_1_to_2 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B ✝ : EffectiveEpiFamily X π ⊢ Epi (Sigma.desc π)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_1_to_2 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B ⊢ EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
infer_instance
case tfae_1_to_2 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B ✝ : EffectiveEpiFamily X π ⊢ Epi (Sigma.desc π)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_1_to_2 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B ✝ : EffectiveEpiFamily X π ⊢ Epi (Sigma.desc π) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
intro e
case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) ⊢ Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b
case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Epi (Sigma.desc π) ⊢ ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) ⊢ Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
rw [epi_iff_surjective] at e
case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Epi (Sigma.desc π) ⊢ ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b
case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) ⊢ ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Epi (Sigma.desc π) ⊢ ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
let i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := (colimit.isColimit _).coconePointUniqueUpToIso (finiteCoproduct.isColimit _)
case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) ⊢ ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b
case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) ⊢ ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) ⊢ ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
intro b
case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) ⊢ ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b
case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop ⊢ ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) ⊢ ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
obtain ⟨t,rfl⟩ := e b
case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop ⊢ ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) ⊢ ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop ⊢ ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
let q := i.hom t
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) ⊢ ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) ⊢ ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
refine ⟨q.1,q.2,?_⟩
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
have : t = i.inv (i.hom t) := show t = (i.hom ≫ i.inv) t by simp only [i.hom_inv_id] ; rfl
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
rw [this]
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(Sigma.desc π) (↑i.inv (↑i.hom t))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(Sigma.desc π) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
show _ = (i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π) (i.hom t)
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(Sigma.desc π) (↑i.inv (↑i.hom t))
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π) (↑i.hom t)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(Sigma.desc π) (↑i.inv (↑i.hom t)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
suffices i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π = finiteCoproduct.desc X π by rw [this] ; rfl
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π) (↑i.hom t)
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π = finiteCoproduct.desc X π
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π) (↑i.hom t) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π = finiteCoproduct.desc X π
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ Sigma.desc π = i.hom ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π = finiteCoproduct.desc X π TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
apply colimit.hom_ext
case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ Sigma.desc π = i.hom ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π
case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ∀ (j : Discrete α), colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) j ≫ Sigma.desc π = colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) j ≫ i.hom ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ Sigma.desc π = i.hom ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
rintro ⟨a⟩
case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ∀ (j : Discrete α), colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) j ≫ Sigma.desc π = colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) j ≫ i.hom ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π
case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) a : α ⊢ colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) { as := a } ≫ Sigma.desc π = colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) { as := a } ≫ i.hom ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) ⊢ ∀ (j : Discrete α), colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) j ≫ Sigma.desc π = colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) j ≫ i.hom ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
simp only [Discrete.functor_obj, colimit.ι_desc, Cofan.mk_pt, Cofan.mk_ι_app, colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_assoc]
case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) a : α ⊢ colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) { as := a } ≫ Sigma.desc π = colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) { as := a } ≫ i.hom ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π
case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) a : α ⊢ π a = (finiteCoproduct.cocone X).ι.app { as := a } ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) a : α ⊢ colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) { as := a } ≫ Sigma.desc π = colimit.ι (Discrete.functor X) { as := a } ≫ i.hom ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
ext
case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) a : α ⊢ π a = (finiteCoproduct.cocone X).ι.app { as := a } ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π
case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w.mk.w X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) a : α x✝ : (forget Profinite).obj (X a) ⊢ ↑(π a) x✝ = ↑((finiteCoproduct.cocone X).ι.app { as := a } ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π) x✝
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w.mk X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) a : α ⊢ π a = (finiteCoproduct.cocone X).ι.app { as := a } ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
rfl
case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w.mk.w X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) a : α x✝ : (forget Profinite).obj (X a) ⊢ ↑(π a) x✝ = ↑((finiteCoproduct.cocone X).ι.app { as := a } ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π) x✝
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_2_to_3.intro.w.mk.w X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) a : α x✝ : (forget Profinite).obj (X a) ⊢ ↑(π a) x✝ = ↑((finiteCoproduct.cocone X).ι.app { as := a } ≫ finiteCoproduct.desc X π) x✝ TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
simp only [i.hom_inv_id]
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ t = ↑(i.hom ≫ i.inv) t
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ t = ↑(𝟙 (∐ X)) t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ t = ↑(i.hom ≫ i.inv) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
rfl
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ t = ↑(𝟙 (∐ X)) t
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t ⊢ t = ↑(𝟙 (∐ X)) t TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
rw [this]
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this✝ : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) this : i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π = finiteCoproduct.desc X π ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π) (↑i.hom t)
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this✝ : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) this : i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π = finiteCoproduct.desc X π ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(finiteCoproduct.desc X π) (↑i.hom t)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this✝ : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) this : i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π = finiteCoproduct.desc X π ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π) (↑i.hom t) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
rfl
X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this✝ : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) this : i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π = finiteCoproduct.desc X π ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(finiteCoproduct.desc X π) (↑i.hom t)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) e : Function.Surjective ↑(Sigma.desc π) i : ∐ X ≅ finiteCoproduct X := IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit (Discrete.functor X)) (finiteCoproduct.isColimit X) t : (forget Profinite).obj (∐ fun b => X b) q : (fun x => (forget Profinite).obj (finiteCoproduct X)) t := ↑i.hom t this✝ : t = ↑i.inv (↑i.hom t) this : i.inv ≫ Sigma.desc π = finiteCoproduct.desc X π ⊢ ↑(π q.fst) q.snd = ↑(finiteCoproduct.desc X π) (↑i.hom t) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
Profinite/Epi.lean
Profinite.effectiveEpiFamily_tfae
[361, 1]
[394, 14]
apply effectiveEpiFamily_of_jointly_surjective
case tfae_3_to_1 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) tfae_2_to_3 : Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ (∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b) → EffectiveEpiFamily X π
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case tfae_3_to_1 X✝ Y B✝ : Profinite f : X✝ ⟶ B✝ g : Y ⟶ B✝ α : Type inst✝ : Fintype α B : Profinite X : α → Profinite π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B tfae_1_to_2 : EffectiveEpiFamily X π → Epi (Sigma.desc π) tfae_2_to_3 : Epi (Sigma.desc π) → ∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b ⊢ (∀ (b : ↑B.toCompHaus.toTop), ∃ a x, ↑(π a) x = b) → EffectiveEpiFamily X π TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_reflects_mono
[11, 1]
[17, 49]
constructor
C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) ⊢ Mono f
case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) ⊢ ∀ {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ X), g ≫ f = h ≫ f → g = h
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) ⊢ Mono f TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_reflects_mono
[11, 1]
[17, 49]
intros W φ ψ h
case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) ⊢ ∀ {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ X), g ≫ f = h ≫ f → g = h
case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) W : C φ ψ : W ⟶ X h : φ ≫ f = ψ ≫ f ⊢ φ = ψ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) ⊢ ∀ {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ X), g ≫ f = h ≫ f → g = h TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_reflects_mono
[11, 1]
[17, 49]
apply e.functor.map_injective
case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) W : C φ ψ : W ⟶ X h : φ ≫ f = ψ ≫ f ⊢ φ = ψ
case right_cancellation.a C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) W : C φ ψ : W ⟶ X h : φ ≫ f = ψ ≫ f ⊢ e.functor.map φ = e.functor.map ψ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) W : C φ ψ : W ⟶ X h : φ ≫ f = ψ ≫ f ⊢ φ = ψ TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_reflects_mono
[11, 1]
[17, 49]
apply hef.1
case right_cancellation.a C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) W : C φ ψ : W ⟶ X h : φ ≫ f = ψ ≫ f ⊢ e.functor.map φ = e.functor.map ψ
case right_cancellation.a.a C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) W : C φ ψ : W ⟶ X h : φ ≫ f = ψ ≫ f ⊢ e.functor.map φ ≫ e.functor.map f = e.functor.map ψ ≫ e.functor.map f
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation.a C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) W : C φ ψ : W ⟶ X h : φ ≫ f = ψ ≫ f ⊢ e.functor.map φ = e.functor.map ψ TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_reflects_mono
[11, 1]
[17, 49]
rw [← Functor.map_comp, ← Functor.map_comp, h]
case right_cancellation.a.a C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) W : C φ ψ : W ⟶ X h : φ ≫ f = ψ ≫ f ⊢ e.functor.map φ ≫ e.functor.map f = e.functor.map ψ ≫ e.functor.map f
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation.a.a C : Type u inst✝¹ : Category C D : Type v inst✝ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y e : C ≌ D hef : Mono (e.functor.map f) W : C φ ψ : W ⟶ X h : φ ≫ f = ψ ≫ f ⊢ e.functor.map φ ≫ e.functor.map f = e.functor.map ψ ≫ e.functor.map f TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_preserves_mono
[19, 1]
[30, 8]
constructor
C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D ⊢ Mono (e.functor.map f)
case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D ⊢ ∀ {Z : D} (g h : Z ⟶ e.functor.obj X), g ≫ e.functor.map f = h ≫ e.functor.map f → g = h
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D ⊢ Mono (e.functor.map f) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_preserves_mono
[19, 1]
[30, 8]
intros W φ ψ h
case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D ⊢ ∀ {Z : D} (g h : Z ⟶ e.functor.obj X), g ≫ e.functor.map f = h ≫ e.functor.map f → g = h
case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ φ = ψ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D ⊢ ∀ {Z : D} (g h : Z ⟶ e.functor.obj X), g ≫ e.functor.map f = h ≫ e.functor.map f → g = h TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_preserves_mono
[19, 1]
[30, 8]
apply Functor.map_injective e.inverse
case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ φ = ψ
case right_cancellation.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ e.inverse.map φ = e.inverse.map ψ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ φ = ψ TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_preserves_mono
[19, 1]
[30, 8]
apply Mono.right_cancellation (f := (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X)
case right_cancellation.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ e.inverse.map φ = e.inverse.map ψ
case right_cancellation.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ e.inverse.map φ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X = e.inverse.map ψ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ e.inverse.map φ = e.inverse.map ψ TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_preserves_mono
[19, 1]
[30, 8]
apply Mono.right_cancellation (f := f)
case right_cancellation.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ e.inverse.map φ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X = e.inverse.map ψ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X
case right_cancellation.a.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ (e.inverse.map φ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f = (e.inverse.map ψ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ e.inverse.map φ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X = e.inverse.map ψ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_preserves_mono
[19, 1]
[30, 8]
apply e.functor.map_injective
case right_cancellation.a.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ (e.inverse.map φ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f = (e.inverse.map ψ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f
case right_cancellation.a.a.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ e.functor.map ((e.inverse.map φ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f) = e.functor.map ((e.inverse.map ψ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation.a.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ (e.inverse.map φ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f = (e.inverse.map ψ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_preserves_mono
[19, 1]
[30, 8]
simp only [Functor.map_comp]
case right_cancellation.a.a.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ e.functor.map ((e.inverse.map φ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f) = e.functor.map ((e.inverse.map ψ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f)
case right_cancellation.a.a.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ (e.functor.map (e.inverse.map φ) ≫ e.functor.map ((Equivalence.unitInv e).app X)) ≫ e.functor.map f = (e.functor.map (e.inverse.map ψ) ≫ e.functor.map ((Equivalence.unitInv e).app X)) ≫ e.functor.map f
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation.a.a.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ e.functor.map ((e.inverse.map φ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f) = e.functor.map ((e.inverse.map ψ ≫ (Equivalence.unitInv e).app X) ≫ f) TACTIC:
https://github.com/adamtopaz/CopenhagenMasterclass2023.git
a293ca1554f7e80d891fd4d86fb092c54d8a0a01
CategoryTheoryExercises/Solutions/Solution3.lean
equiv_preserves_mono
[19, 1]
[30, 8]
simpa
case right_cancellation.a.a.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ (e.functor.map (e.inverse.map φ) ≫ e.functor.map ((Equivalence.unitInv e).app X)) ≫ e.functor.map f = (e.functor.map (e.inverse.map ψ) ≫ e.functor.map ((Equivalence.unitInv e).app X)) ≫ e.functor.map f
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right_cancellation.a.a.a.a C : Type u inst✝² : Category C D : Type v inst✝¹ : Category D X Y : C f : X ⟶ Y inst✝ : Mono f e : C ≌ D W : D φ ψ : W ⟶ e.functor.obj X h : φ ≫ e.functor.map f = ψ ≫ e.functor.map f ⊢ (e.functor.map (e.inverse.map φ) ≫ e.functor.map ((Equivalence.unitInv e).app X)) ≫ e.functor.map f = (e.functor.map (e.inverse.map ψ) ≫ e.functor.map ((Equivalence.unitInv e).app X)) ≫ e.functor.map f TACTIC:
https://github.com/negiizhao/Algorithm.git
ae2bb2d101ce546ffe90434d718f919ef346c2ea
Algorithm/Data/Classes/MinHeap.lean
Multiset.inf_eq_top
[13, 1]
[15, 7]
rw [le_antisymm_iff]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : SemilatticeInf α inst✝ : OrderTop α m : Multiset α ⊢ m.inf = ⊤ ↔ ∀ a ∈ m, a = ⊤
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : SemilatticeInf α inst✝ : OrderTop α m : Multiset α ⊢ m.inf ≤ ⊤ ∧ ⊤ ≤ m.inf ↔ ∀ a ∈ m, a = ⊤
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : SemilatticeInf α inst✝ : OrderTop α m : Multiset α ⊢ m.inf = ⊤ ↔ ∀ a ∈ m, a = ⊤ TACTIC:
https://github.com/negiizhao/Algorithm.git
ae2bb2d101ce546ffe90434d718f919ef346c2ea
Algorithm/Data/Classes/MinHeap.lean
Multiset.inf_eq_top
[13, 1]
[15, 7]
simp
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : SemilatticeInf α inst✝ : OrderTop α m : Multiset α ⊢ m.inf ≤ ⊤ ∧ ⊤ ≤ m.inf ↔ ∀ a ∈ m, a = ⊤
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : SemilatticeInf α inst✝ : OrderTop α m : Multiset α ⊢ m.inf ≤ ⊤ ∧ ⊤ ≤ m.inf ↔ ∀ a ∈ m, a = ⊤ TACTIC:
https://github.com/negiizhao/Algorithm.git
ae2bb2d101ce546ffe90434d718f919ef346c2ea
Algorithm/Data/Classes/MinHeap.lean
MinHeap.head?_ne_top
[52, 1]
[56, 15]
intro hc
C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true ⊢ head? c ≠ ⊤
C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true hc : head? c = ⊤ ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true ⊢ head? c ≠ ⊤ TACTIC:
https://github.com/negiizhao/Algorithm.git
ae2bb2d101ce546ffe90434d718f919ef346c2ea
Algorithm/Data/Classes/MinHeap.lean
MinHeap.head?_ne_top
[52, 1]
[56, 15]
have := hc ▸ (head?_mem_toMultiset_map c h)
C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true hc : head? c = ⊤ ⊢ False
C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true hc : head? c = ⊤ this : ⊤ ∈ Multiset.map WithTop.some (toMultiset c) ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true hc : head? c = ⊤ ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/negiizhao/Algorithm.git
ae2bb2d101ce546ffe90434d718f919ef346c2ea
Algorithm/Data/Classes/MinHeap.lean
MinHeap.head?_ne_top
[52, 1]
[56, 15]
simp at this
C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true hc : head? c = ⊤ this : ⊤ ∈ Multiset.map WithTop.some (toMultiset c) ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true hc : head? c = ⊤ this : ⊤ ∈ Multiset.map WithTop.some (toMultiset c) ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/negiizhao/Algorithm.git
ae2bb2d101ce546ffe90434d718f919ef346c2ea
Algorithm/Data/Classes/MinHeap.lean
MinHeap.head_def
[58, 1]
[61, 71]
simpa using MinHeap.coe_head_eq_head? c h
C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true ⊢ ↑(head c h) = ↑((head? c).untop ⋯)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true ⊢ ↑(head c h) = ↑((head? c).untop ⋯) TACTIC:
https://github.com/negiizhao/Algorithm.git
ae2bb2d101ce546ffe90434d718f919ef346c2ea
Algorithm/Data/Classes/MinHeap.lean
MinHeap.head_mem_toMultiset
[63, 1]
[66, 20]
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp (head?_mem_toMultiset_map c h)
C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true ⊢ head c h ∈ toMultiset c
case intro.intro C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true x : α hx₁ : x ∈ toMultiset c hx₂ : ↑x = head? c ⊢ head c h ∈ toMultiset c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true ⊢ head c h ∈ toMultiset c TACTIC:
https://github.com/negiizhao/Algorithm.git
ae2bb2d101ce546ffe90434d718f919ef346c2ea
Algorithm/Data/Classes/MinHeap.lean
MinHeap.head_mem_toMultiset
[63, 1]
[66, 20]
simp [hx₁, ← hx₂]
case intro.intro C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true x : α hx₁ : x ∈ toMultiset c hx₂ : ↑x = head? c ⊢ head c h ∈ toMultiset c
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true x : α hx₁ : x ∈ toMultiset c hx₂ : ↑x = head? c ⊢ head c h ∈ toMultiset c TACTIC:
https://github.com/negiizhao/Algorithm.git
ae2bb2d101ce546ffe90434d718f919ef346c2ea
Algorithm/Data/Classes/MinHeap.lean
MinHeap.head_mem
[68, 1]
[70, 52]
exact mem_toMultiset.mp (head_mem_toMultiset c h)
C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true ⊢ head c h ∈ c
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C h : ¬isEmpty c = true ⊢ head c h ∈ c TACTIC:
https://github.com/negiizhao/Algorithm.git
ae2bb2d101ce546ffe90434d718f919ef346c2ea
Algorithm/Data/Classes/MinHeap.lean
MinHeap.head_le
[72, 1]
[74, 53]
simpa [WithTop.untop_le_iff] using head?_le c x hx
C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C x : α hx : x ∈ c ⊢ head c ⋯ ≤ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: C : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝² : Preorder α inst✝¹ : IsTotalPreorder α fun x x_1 => x ≤ x_1 inst✝ : MinHeap C α c : C x : α hx : x ∈ c ⊢ head c ⋯ ≤ x TACTIC: