url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/Commutators.lean
contains_commutators_of
[86, 1]
[122, 10]
exact Subgroup.mem_comap.mp hy
G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) S_top : comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) = ⊤ x : G ⧸ N a✝ : x ∈ ⊤ y : G := Quotient.out' x hy : y ∈ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) ⊢ ↑(Quotient.out' x) ∈ MonoidHom.range φ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) S_top : comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) = ⊤ x : G ⧸ N a✝ : x ∈ ⊤ y : G := Quotient.out' x hy : y ∈ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) ⊢ ↑(Quotient.out' x) ∈ MonoidHom.range φ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/Commutators.lean
contains_commutators_of
[86, 1]
[122, 10]
rw [S_top]
G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) S_top : comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) = ⊤ x : G ⧸ N a✝ : x ∈ ⊤ y : G := Quotient.out' x ⊢ y ∈ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ)
G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) S_top : comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) = ⊤ x : G ⧸ N a✝ : x ∈ ⊤ y : G := Quotient.out' x ⊢ y ∈ ⊤
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) S_top : comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) = ⊤ x : G ⧸ N a✝ : x ∈ ⊤ y : G := Quotient.out' x ⊢ y ∈ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/Commutators.lean
contains_commutators_of
[86, 1]
[122, 10]
exact Subgroup.mem_top y
G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) S_top : comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) = ⊤ x : G ⧸ N a✝ : x ∈ ⊤ y : G := Quotient.out' x ⊢ y ∈ ⊤
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) S_top : comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) = ⊤ x : G ⧸ N a✝ : x ∈ ⊤ y : G := Quotient.out' x ⊢ y ∈ ⊤ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/Commutators.lean
contains_commutators_of
[86, 1]
[122, 10]
intro g hg
case left G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) ⊢ N ≤ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ)
case left G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) g : G hg : g ∈ N ⊢ g ∈ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case left G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) ⊢ N ≤ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/Commutators.lean
contains_commutators_of
[86, 1]
[122, 10]
rw [Subgroup.mem_comap]
case left G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) g : G hg : g ∈ N ⊢ g ∈ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ)
case left G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) g : G hg : g ∈ N ⊢ (QuotientGroup.mk' N) g ∈ MonoidHom.range φ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case left G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) g : G hg : g ∈ N ⊢ g ∈ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/Commutators.lean
contains_commutators_of
[86, 1]
[122, 10]
convert (MonoidHom.range φ).one_mem
case left G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) g : G hg : g ∈ N ⊢ (QuotientGroup.mk' N) g ∈ MonoidHom.range φ
case h.e'_4 G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) g : G hg : g ∈ N ⊢ (QuotientGroup.mk' N) g = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case left G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) g : G hg : g ∈ N ⊢ (QuotientGroup.mk' N) g ∈ MonoidHom.range φ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/Commutators.lean
contains_commutators_of
[86, 1]
[122, 10]
simp only [hg, QuotientGroup.mk'_apply, QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff]
case h.e'_4 G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) g : G hg : g ∈ N ⊢ (QuotientGroup.mk' N) g = 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.e'_4 G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) g : G hg : g ∈ N ⊢ (QuotientGroup.mk' N) g = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/Commutators.lean
contains_commutators_of
[86, 1]
[122, 10]
intro h hh
case right G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) ⊢ H ≤ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ)
case right G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) h : G hh : h ∈ H ⊢ h ∈ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) ⊢ H ≤ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/Commutators.lean
contains_commutators_of
[86, 1]
[122, 10]
simp only [mem_comap, QuotientGroup.mk'_apply, MonoidHom.mem_range, MonoidHom.coe_comp, QuotientGroup.coe_mk', coeSubtype, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.exists, exists_prop, φ]
case right G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) h : G hh : h ∈ H ⊢ h ∈ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ)
case right G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) h : G hh : h ∈ H ⊢ ∃ a ∈ H, ↑a = ↑h
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) h : G hh : h ∈ H ⊢ h ∈ comap (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (MonoidHom.range φ) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/Mathlib/Commutators.lean
contains_commutators_of
[86, 1]
[122, 10]
use h
case right G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) h : G hh : h ∈ H ⊢ ∃ a ∈ H, ↑a = ↑h
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case right G : Type u_1 inst✝ : Group G N : Subgroup G nN : Normal N H : Subgroup G hHN : N ⊔ H = ⊤ hH : Subgroup.IsCommutative H φ : ↥H →* G ⧸ N := MonoidHom.comp (QuotientGroup.mk' N) (Subgroup.subtype H) h : G hh : h ∈ H ⊢ ∃ a ∈ H, ↑a = ↑h TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.fixingSubgroup_conj
[44, 1]
[53, 100]
ext k
α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g : G ⊢ fixingSubgroup G (g • s) = MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup G s
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G ⊢ k ∈ fixingSubgroup G (g • s) ↔ k ∈ MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup G s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g : G ⊢ fixingSubgroup G (g • s) = MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup G s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.fixingSubgroup_conj
[44, 1]
[53, 100]
simp only [mem_fixingSubgroup_iff, Subgroup.mem_pointwise_smul_iff_inv_smul_mem]
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G ⊢ k ∈ fixingSubgroup G (g • s) ↔ k ∈ MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup G s
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G ⊢ (∀ y ∈ g • s, k • y = y) ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • y = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G ⊢ k ∈ fixingSubgroup G (g • s) ↔ k ∈ MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup G s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.fixingSubgroup_conj
[44, 1]
[53, 100]
rw [Equiv.forall_congr (toPerm g⁻¹)]
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G ⊢ (∀ y ∈ g • s, k • y = y) ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • y = y
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G ⊢ ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G ⊢ (∀ y ∈ g • s, k • y = y) ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.fixingSubgroup_conj
[44, 1]
[53, 100]
intro x
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G ⊢ ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G x : α ⊢ x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G ⊢ ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.fixingSubgroup_conj
[44, 1]
[53, 100]
simp only [toPerm_apply]
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G x : α ⊢ x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G x : α ⊢ x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ g⁻¹ • x ∈ s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G x : α ⊢ x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.fixingSubgroup_conj
[44, 1]
[53, 100]
rw [← Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G x : α ⊢ x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ g⁻¹ • x ∈ s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G x : α ⊢ x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ x ∈ g • s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G x : α ⊢ x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ g⁻¹ • x ∈ s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.fixingSubgroup_conj
[44, 1]
[53, 100]
simp only [MulAut.smul_def, MulAut.conj_inv_apply, mul_smul, smul_inv_smul, smul_left_cancel_iff]
case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G x : α ⊢ x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ x ∈ g • s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α✝ : Type ?u.1776 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g k : G x : α ⊢ x ∈ g • s → k • x = x ↔ x ∈ g • s → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT'_isConj
[55, 1]
[67, 35]
ext k
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ IwasawaT' (g • s) = MulAut.conj g • IwasawaT' s
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ k ∈ IwasawaT' (g • s) ↔ k ∈ MulAut.conj g • IwasawaT' s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ IwasawaT' (g • s) = MulAut.conj g • IwasawaT' s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT'_isConj
[55, 1]
[67, 35]
unfold IwasawaT'
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ k ∈ IwasawaT' (g • s) ↔ k ∈ MulAut.conj g • IwasawaT' s
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ k ∈ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑(g • s))ᶜ ↔ k ∈ MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑s)ᶜ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ k ∈ IwasawaT' (g • s) ↔ k ∈ MulAut.conj g • IwasawaT' s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT'_isConj
[55, 1]
[67, 35]
simp only [Finset.coe_smul_finset, mem_fixingSubgroup_iff, Subgroup.mem_pointwise_smul_iff_inv_smul_mem]
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ k ∈ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑(g • s))ᶜ ↔ k ∈ MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑s)ᶜ
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ (∀ y ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ, k • y = y) ↔ ∀ y ∈ (↑s)ᶜ, ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • y = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ k ∈ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑(g • s))ᶜ ↔ k ∈ MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑s)ᶜ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT'_isConj
[55, 1]
[67, 35]
rw [Equiv.forall_congr (toPerm g⁻¹)]
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ (∀ y ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ, k • y = y) ↔ ∀ y ∈ (↑s)ᶜ, ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • y = y
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ (∀ y ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ, k • y = y) ↔ ∀ y ∈ (↑s)ᶜ, ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT'_isConj
[55, 1]
[67, 35]
intro x
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α x : α ⊢ x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α ⊢ ∀ {x : α}, x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT'_isConj
[55, 1]
[67, 35]
simp only [toPerm_apply]
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α x : α ⊢ x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α x : α ⊢ x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ g⁻¹ • x ∈ (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α x : α ⊢ x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ (toPerm g⁻¹) x ∈ (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • (toPerm g⁻¹) x = (toPerm g⁻¹) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT'_isConj
[55, 1]
[67, 35]
rw [← Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α x : α ⊢ x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ g⁻¹ • x ∈ (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α x : α ⊢ x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ x ∈ g • (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α x : α ⊢ x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ g⁻¹ • x ∈ (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT'_isConj
[55, 1]
[67, 35]
simp only [Set.mem_compl_iff, Perm.smul_def, smul_compl_set, MulAut.smul_def, MulAut.conj_inv_apply, coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, apply_inv_self, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α x : α ⊢ x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ x ∈ g • (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g k : Perm α x : α ⊢ x ∈ (g • ↑s)ᶜ → k • x = x ↔ x ∈ g • (↑s)ᶜ → ((MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ • k) • g⁻¹ • x = g⁻¹ • x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
ext k
α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s ⊢ MonoidHom.range ofSubtype = fixingSubgroup (Perm α) sᶜ
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ k ∈ MonoidHom.range ofSubtype ↔ k ∈ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) sᶜ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s ⊢ MonoidHom.range ofSubtype = fixingSubgroup (Perm α) sᶜ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
simp only [mem_fixingSubgroup_iff, Set.mem_compl_iff, Finset.mem_coe, Perm.smul_def, Finset.coe_sort_coe, MonoidHom.mem_range]
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ k ∈ MonoidHom.range ofSubtype ↔ k ∈ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) sᶜ
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ (∃ x, ofSubtype x = k) ↔ ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ k ∈ MonoidHom.range ofSubtype ↔ k ∈ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) sᶜ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
constructor
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ (∃ x, ofSubtype x = k) ↔ ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y
case h.mp α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ (∃ x, ofSubtype x = k) → ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ (∀ y ∉ s, k y = y) → ∃ x, ofSubtype x = k
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ (∃ x, ofSubtype x = k) ↔ ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
case h.mp α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ (∃ x, ofSubtype x = k) → ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y
case h.mp.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ⊢ ∀ y ∉ s, (ofSubtype k) y = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ (∃ x, ofSubtype x = k) → ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
intro y hy
case h.mp.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ⊢ ∀ y ∉ s, (ofSubtype k) y = y
case h.mp.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm { x // x ∈ s } y : α hy : y ∉ s ⊢ (ofSubtype k) y = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ⊢ ∀ y ∉ s, (ofSubtype k) y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem k hy]
case h.mp.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm { x // x ∈ s } y : α hy : y ∉ s ⊢ (ofSubtype k) y = y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp.intro α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm { x // x ∈ s } y : α hy : y ∉ s ⊢ (ofSubtype k) y = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
intro h
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ (∀ y ∉ s, k y = y) → ∃ x, ofSubtype x = k
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ ∃ x, ofSubtype x = k
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α ⊢ (∀ y ∉ s, k y = y) → ∃ x, ofSubtype x = k TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
suffices hk' : _ by use Equiv.Perm.subtypePerm k hk' rw [Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_subtypePerm] simp only [ne_eq, Finset.mem_coe] intro x rw [not_imp_comm] exact h x
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s ⊢ ∃ x, ofSubtype x = k
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s ⊢ ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s ⊢ ∃ x, ofSubtype x = k TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
intro x
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s ⊢ ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s x : α ⊢ x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s ⊢ ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
rw [← Equiv.Perm.smul_def]
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s x : α ⊢ x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s x : α ⊢ x ∈ s ↔ k • x ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s x : α ⊢ x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
nth_rewrite 2 [hks]
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s x : α ⊢ x ∈ s ↔ k • x ∈ s
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s x : α ⊢ x ∈ s ↔ k • x ∈ k • s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s x : α ⊢ x ∈ s ↔ k • x ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
rw [Set.smul_mem_smul_set_iff]
case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s x : α ⊢ x ∈ s ↔ k • x ∈ k • s
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s x : α ⊢ x ∈ s ↔ k • x ∈ k • s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
apply le_antisymm
α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ s = k • s
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ s ≤ k • s case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ k • s ≤ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ s = k • s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
. intro x hx rw [Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem, Perm.smul_def] by_contra hx' rw [← h _ hx', apply_inv_self] at hx' exact hx' hx
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ s ≤ k • s case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ k • s ≤ s
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ k • s ≤ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ s ≤ k • s case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ k • s ≤ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
intro x hx
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ s ≤ k • s
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s ⊢ x ∈ k • s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ s ≤ k • s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
rw [Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem, Perm.smul_def]
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s ⊢ x ∈ k • s
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s ⊢ k⁻¹ x ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s ⊢ x ∈ k • s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
by_contra hx'
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s ⊢ k⁻¹ x ∈ s
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s hx' : k⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s ⊢ k⁻¹ x ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
rw [← h _ hx', apply_inv_self] at hx'
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s hx' : k⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ False
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s hx' : x ∉ s ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s hx' : k⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
exact hx' hx
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s hx' : x ∉ s ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y x : α hx : x ∈ s hx' : x ∉ s ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
intro a ha
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ k • s ≤ s
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y a : α ha : a ∈ k • s ⊢ a ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y ⊢ k • s ≤ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
by_contra ha'
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y a : α ha : a ∈ k • s ⊢ a ∈ s
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y a : α ha : a ∈ k • s ha' : a ∉ s ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y a : α ha : a ∈ k • s ⊢ a ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
rw [← h _ ha', ← Perm.smul_def, Set.smul_mem_smul_set_iff] at ha
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y a : α ha : a ∈ k • s ha' : a ∉ s ⊢ False
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y a : α ha : a ∈ s ha' : a ∉ s ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y a : α ha : a ∈ k • s ha' : a ∉ s ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
exact ha' ha
case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y a : α ha : a ∈ s ha' : a ∉ s ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y a : α ha : a ∈ s ha' : a ∉ s ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
use Equiv.Perm.subtypePerm k hk'
α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ?m.15812 ⊢ ∃ x, ofSubtype x = k
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s ⊢ ofSubtype (subtypePerm k hk') = k
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ?m.15812 ⊢ ∃ x, ofSubtype x = k TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
rw [Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_subtypePerm]
case h α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s ⊢ ofSubtype (subtypePerm k hk') = k
case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s ⊢ ∀ (x : α), k x ≠ x → x ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s ⊢ ofSubtype (subtypePerm k hk') = k TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
simp only [ne_eq, Finset.mem_coe]
case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s ⊢ ∀ (x : α), k x ≠ x → x ∈ s
case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s ⊢ ∀ (x : α), ¬k x = x → x ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s ⊢ ∀ (x : α), k x ≠ x → x ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
intro x
case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s ⊢ ∀ (x : α), ¬k x = x → x ∈ s
case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s x : α ⊢ ¬k x = x → x ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s ⊢ ∀ (x : α), ¬k x = x → x ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
rw [not_imp_comm]
case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s x : α ⊢ ¬k x = x → x ∈ s
case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s x : α ⊢ x ∉ s → k x = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s x : α ⊢ ¬k x = x → x ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq
[69, 1]
[101, 35]
exact h x
case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s x : α ⊢ x ∉ s → k x = x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.h₂ α : Type u_1 inst✝² : DecidableEq α inst✝¹ : Fintype α s : Set α inst✝ : DecidablePred fun a => a ∈ s k : Perm α h : ∀ y ∉ s, k y = y hks : s = k • s hk' : ∀ (x : α), x ∈ s ↔ k x ∈ s x : α ⊢ x ∉ s → k x = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
MulAction.smul_compl_set_eq
[103, 1]
[107, 48]
ext k
α✝ : Type ?u.17129 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g : G ⊢ (g • s)ᶜ = g • sᶜ
case h α✝ : Type ?u.17129 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g : G k : α ⊢ k ∈ (g • s)ᶜ ↔ k ∈ g • sᶜ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α✝ : Type ?u.17129 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g : G ⊢ (g • s)ᶜ = g • sᶜ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
MulAction.smul_compl_set_eq
[103, 1]
[107, 48]
simp only [Set.mem_compl_iff, smul_compl_set]
case h α✝ : Type ?u.17129 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g : G k : α ⊢ k ∈ (g • s)ᶜ ↔ k ∈ g • sᶜ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h α✝ : Type ?u.17129 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ G : Type u_1 α : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group G inst✝ : MulAction G α s : Set α g : G k : α ⊢ k ∈ (g • s)ᶜ ↔ k ∈ g • sᶜ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.this1
[110, 1]
[113, 6]
simp only [← MonoidHom.map_range]
α : Type ?u.19573 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α inst✝² : Fintype α G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group H inst✝ : Group G f : H →* G g : G ⊢ MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range f = MonoidHom.range (MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) f)
α : Type ?u.19573 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α inst✝² : Fintype α G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group H inst✝ : Group G f : H →* G g : G ⊢ MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range f = Subgroup.map (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (MonoidHom.range f)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type ?u.19573 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α inst✝² : Fintype α G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group H inst✝ : Group G f : H →* G g : G ⊢ MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range f = MonoidHom.range (MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) f) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.this1
[110, 1]
[113, 6]
rfl
α : Type ?u.19573 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α inst✝² : Fintype α G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group H inst✝ : Group G f : H →* G g : G ⊢ MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range f = Subgroup.map (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (MonoidHom.range f)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type ?u.19573 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α inst✝² : Fintype α G : Type u_1 H : Type u_2 inst✝¹ : Group H inst✝ : Group G f : H →* G g : G ⊢ MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range f = Subgroup.map (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (MonoidHom.range f) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj'
[120, 1]
[126, 39]
unfold IwasawaT
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ IwasawaT (g • s) = MulAut.conj g • IwasawaT s
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ IwasawaT (g • s) = MulAut.conj g • IwasawaT s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj'
[120, 1]
[126, 39]
unfold Iwt
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ MonoidHom.range ofSubtype = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range ofSubtype
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj'
[120, 1]
[126, 39]
simp only [Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_range_eq]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ MonoidHom.range ofSubtype = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range ofSubtype
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑(g • s))ᶜ = MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑s)ᶜ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ MonoidHom.range ofSubtype = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range ofSubtype TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj'
[120, 1]
[126, 39]
simp only [Finset.coe_smul_finset, ← smul_compl_set]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑(g • s))ᶜ = MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑s)ᶜ
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (g • (↑s)ᶜ) = MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑s)ᶜ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑(g • s))ᶜ = MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑s)ᶜ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj'
[120, 1]
[126, 39]
apply Equiv.Perm.fixingSubgroup_conj
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (g • (↑s)ᶜ) = MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑s)ᶜ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (g • (↑s)ᶜ) = MulAut.conj g • fixingSubgroup (Perm α) (↑s)ᶜ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
unfold IwasawaT
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ IwasawaT (g • s) = MulAut.conj g • IwasawaT s
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ IwasawaT (g • s) = MulAut.conj g • IwasawaT s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
have hkg : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s := by intro a rw [← Equiv.Perm.smul_def, Finset.smul_mem_smul_finset_iff]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
let kg : s ≃ (g • s : Finset α) := Equiv.subtypeEquiv g hkg
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
let kg' := Equiv.permCongrMul kg
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
suffices (Iwt (g • s)).comp kg'.toMonoidHom = ((MulAut.conj g).toMonoidHom.comp (Iwt s)) by rw [this1, ← this, ← SetLike.coe_set_eq] simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, MonoidHom.coe_range, MonoidHom.coe_comp, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, EquivLike.surjective_comp, EquivLike.range_comp]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg ⊢ MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg') = MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
ext h x
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg ⊢ MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg') = MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s)
case h.H α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α ⊢ ((MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg')) h) x = ((MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s)) h) x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg ⊢ MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg') = MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
unfold Iwt
case h.H α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α ⊢ ((MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg')) h) x = ((MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s)) h) x
case h.H α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α ⊢ ((MonoidHom.comp ofSubtype (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg')) h) x = ((MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) ofSubtype) h) x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.H α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α ⊢ ((MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg')) h) x = ((MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s)) h) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, MonoidHom.coe_comp, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, Function.comp_apply, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mul]
case h.H α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α ⊢ ((MonoidHom.comp ofSubtype (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg')) h) x = ((MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) ofSubtype) h) x
case h.H α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.H α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α ⊢ ((MonoidHom.comp ofSubtype (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg')) h) x = ((MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) ofSubtype) h) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
by_cases hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s
case h.H α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x))
case pos α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x)) case neg α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.H α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
intro a
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α a : α ⊢ a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α ⊢ ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
rw [← Equiv.Perm.smul_def, Finset.smul_mem_smul_finset_iff]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α a : α ⊢ a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α a : α ⊢ a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
rw [this1, ← this, ← SetLike.coe_set_eq]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg this : MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg') = MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s) ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s)
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg this : MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg') = MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s) ⊢ ↑(MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s))) = ↑(MonoidHom.range (MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg')))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg this : MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg') = MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s) ⊢ MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s)) = MulAut.conj g • MonoidHom.range (Iwt s) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, MonoidHom.coe_range, MonoidHom.coe_comp, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, EquivLike.surjective_comp, EquivLike.range_comp]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg this : MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg') = MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s) ⊢ ↑(MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s))) = ↑(MonoidHom.range (MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg')))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg this : MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg') = MonoidHom.comp (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MulAut.conj g)) (Iwt s) ⊢ ↑(MonoidHom.range (Iwt (g • s))) = ↑(MonoidHom.range (MonoidHom.comp (Iwt (g • s)) (MulEquiv.toMonoidHom kg'))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
suffices hx' : x ∈ g • s by rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_mem h hx] rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_mem ((Equiv.permCongrMul kg) h) hx'] unfold Equiv.permCongrMul simp only [toFun_as_coe, invFun_as_coe, permCongr_symm, subtypeEquiv_symm, MulEquiv.coe_mk, coe_fn_mk, permCongr_apply, subtypeEquiv_apply, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq] rfl
case pos α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x))
case pos α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s ⊢ x ∈ g • s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
exact Finset.inv_smul_mem_iff.mp hx
case pos α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s ⊢ x ∈ g • s
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s ⊢ x ∈ g • s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_mem h hx]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x))
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx })
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_mem ((Equiv.permCongrMul kg) h) hx']
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx })
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ ↑(((Equiv.permCongrMul kg) h) { val := x, property := hx' }) = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx })
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx }) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
unfold Equiv.permCongrMul
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ ↑(((Equiv.permCongrMul kg) h) { val := x, property := hx' }) = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx })
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ ↑(((let __src := permCongr kg; { toEquiv := __src, map_mul' := ⋯ }) h) { val := x, property := hx' }) = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx })
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ ↑(((Equiv.permCongrMul kg) h) { val := x, property := hx' }) = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx }) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
simp only [toFun_as_coe, invFun_as_coe, permCongr_symm, subtypeEquiv_symm, MulEquiv.coe_mk, coe_fn_mk, permCongr_apply, subtypeEquiv_apply, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ ↑(((let __src := permCongr kg; { toEquiv := __src, map_mul' := ⋯ }) h) { val := x, property := hx' }) = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx })
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ ↑(kg (h (kg.symm { val := x, property := hx' }))) = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx })
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ ↑(((let __src := permCongr kg; { toEquiv := __src, map_mul' := ⋯ }) h) { val := x, property := hx' }) = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx }) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
rfl
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ ↑(kg (h (kg.symm { val := x, property := hx' }))) = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx })
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∈ s hx' : x ∈ g • s ⊢ ↑(kg (h (kg.symm { val := x, property := hx' }))) = g ↑(h { val := g⁻¹ x, property := hx }) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
suffices hx' : x ∉ g • s by rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem h hx] rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem ((Equiv.permCongrMul kg) h) hx'] simp only [apply_inv_self]
case neg α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x))
case neg α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ x ∉ g • s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
rw [← Finset.inv_smul_mem_iff]
case neg α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ x ∉ g • s
case neg α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ g⁻¹ • x ∉ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ x ∉ g • s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
exact hx
case neg α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ g⁻¹ • x ∉ s
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s ⊢ g⁻¹ • x ∉ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem h hx]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s hx' : x ∉ g • s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x))
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s hx' : x ∉ g • s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g (g⁻¹ x)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s hx' : x ∉ g • s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g ((ofSubtype h) (g⁻¹ x)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem ((Equiv.permCongrMul kg) h) hx']
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s hx' : x ∉ g • s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g (g⁻¹ x)
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s hx' : x ∉ g • s ⊢ x = g (g⁻¹ x)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s hx' : x ∉ g • s ⊢ (ofSubtype (kg' h)) x = g (g⁻¹ x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.IwasawaT_is_conj
[128, 1]
[178, 13]
simp only [apply_inv_self]
α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s hx' : x ∉ g • s ⊢ x = g (g⁻¹ x)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α s : Finset α g : Perm α hkg : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ s ↔ g a ∈ g • s kg : { x // x ∈ s } ≃ { x // x ∈ g • s } := subtypeEquiv g hkg kg' : Perm { x // x ∈ s } ≃* Perm { x // x ∈ g • s } := Equiv.permCongrMul kg h : Perm { x // x ∈ s } x : α hx : g⁻¹ x ∉ s hx' : x ∉ g • s ⊢ x = g (g⁻¹ x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
rw [← alternatingGroup.commutator_group_eq hα]
α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ alternatingGroup α ≤ N
α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ commutator (Perm α) ≤ N
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ alternatingGroup α ≤ N TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
refine' commutator_le_iwasawa _ iwasawa_two hnN _
α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ commutator (Perm α) ≤ N
case refine'_1 α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ IsQuasipreprimitive (Perm α) ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) case refine'_2 α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) ≠ ⊤
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ commutator (Perm α) ≤ N TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
intro h
case refine'_2 α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) ≠ ⊤
case refine'_2 α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine'_2 α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) ≠ ⊤ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
obtain ⟨g, hgN, hg_ne⟩ := N.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one.mp ntN
case refine'_2 α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ ⊢ False
case refine'_2.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine'_2 α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Nat.combination.mulAction_faithful (G := Equiv.Perm α) (α := α) (g := g) 2 (by norm_num) (by rw [PartENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, PartENat.coe_le_coe] apply le_trans (by norm_num) hα) (by exact hg_ne)
case refine'_2.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 ⊢ False
case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine'_2.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
apply hs
case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ False
case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ g • s = s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
suffices s ∈ fixedPoints N (Nat.Combination α 2) by rw [mem_fixedPoints] at this exact this ⟨g, hgN⟩
case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ g • s = s
case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ s ∈ fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ g • s = s TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
rw [h, Set.top_eq_univ]
case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ s ∈ fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2)
case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ s ∈ _root_.Set.univ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ s ∈ fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
apply Set.mem_univ
case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ s ∈ _root_.Set.univ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine'_2.intro.intro.intro α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N h : fixedPoints ↥N ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) = ⊤ g : Perm α hgN : g ∈ N hg_ne : g ≠ 1 s : ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) hs : g • s ≠ s ⊢ s ∈ _root_.Set.univ TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
apply IsPreprimitive.isQuasipreprimitive
case refine'_1 α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ IsQuasipreprimitive (Perm α) ↑(Nat.Combination α 2)
case refine'_1.hGX α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ IsPreprimitive (Perm α) ↑(Nat.Combination α 2)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine'_1 α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ IsQuasipreprimitive (Perm α) ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) TACTIC:
https://github.com/AntoineChambert-Loir/Jordan4.git
d49910c127be01229697737a55a2d756e908d3e1
Jordan/PermIwasawa.lean
Equiv.Perm.Equiv.Perm.normal_subgroups
[215, 1]
[241, 21]
apply Nat.Combination_isPreprimitive
case refine'_1.hGX α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ IsPreprimitive (Perm α) ↑(Nat.Combination α 2)
case refine'_1.hGX.h_one_le α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ 1 ≤ 2 case refine'_1.hGX.hn α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ 2 < Fintype.card α case refine'_1.hGX.hα α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ Fintype.card α ≠ 2 * 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine'_1.hGX α✝ : Type ?u.55854 inst✝³ : DecidableEq α✝ inst✝² : Fintype α✝ α : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq α inst✝ : Fintype α hα : 5 ≤ Fintype.card α N : Subgroup (Perm α) hnN : Subgroup.Normal N ntN : Nontrivial ↥N ⊢ IsPreprimitive (Perm α) ↑(Nat.Combination α 2) TACTIC: