url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/Junology/dijkstra.git
81543f27ea34811910c10871ecf7e6243f952b19
Dijkstra/Control/Monad/Hom.lean
MonadHom.ext
[43, 1]
[46, 12]
funext _ x
m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝¹ : Monad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝ : Monad n F G : MonadHom m n h : βˆ€ {Ξ± : Type u} (x : m Ξ±), app F x = app G x ⊒ F.app = G.app
case h.h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝¹ : Monad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝ : Monad n F G : MonadHom m n h : βˆ€ {Ξ± : Type u} (x : m Ξ±), app F x = app G x x✝ : Type u x : m x✝ ⊒ app F x = app G x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝¹ : Monad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝ : Monad n F G : MonadHom m n h : βˆ€ {Ξ± : Type u} (x : m Ξ±), app F x = app G x ⊒ F.app = G.app TACTIC:
https://github.com/Junology/dijkstra.git
81543f27ea34811910c10871ecf7e6243f952b19
Dijkstra/Control/Monad/Hom.lean
MonadHom.ext
[43, 1]
[46, 12]
exact h x
case h.h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝¹ : Monad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝ : Monad n F G : MonadHom m n h : βˆ€ {Ξ± : Type u} (x : m Ξ±), app F x = app G x x✝ : Type u x : m x✝ ⊒ app F x = app G x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝¹ : Monad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝ : Monad n F G : MonadHom m n h : βˆ€ {Ξ± : Type u} (x : m Ξ±), app F x = app G x x✝ : Type u x : m x✝ ⊒ app F x = app G x TACTIC:
https://github.com/Junology/dijkstra.git
81543f27ea34811910c10871ecf7e6243f952b19
Dijkstra/Control/Monad/Hom.lean
MonadHom.naturality
[49, 1]
[53, 24]
funext x
m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² ⊒ app F ∘ Functor.map f = Functor.map f ∘ app F
case h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² x : m Ξ± ⊒ (app F ∘ Functor.map f) x = (Functor.map f ∘ app F) x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² ⊒ app F ∘ Functor.map f = Functor.map f ∘ app F TACTIC:
https://github.com/Junology/dijkstra.git
81543f27ea34811910c10871ecf7e6243f952b19
Dijkstra/Control/Monad/Hom.lean
MonadHom.naturality
[49, 1]
[53, 24]
dsimp
case h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² x : m Ξ± ⊒ (app F ∘ Functor.map f) x = (Functor.map f ∘ app F) x
case h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² x : m Ξ± ⊒ app F (f <$> x) = f <$> app F x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² x : m Ξ± ⊒ (app F ∘ Functor.map f) x = (Functor.map f ∘ app F) x TACTIC:
https://github.com/Junology/dijkstra.git
81543f27ea34811910c10871ecf7e6243f952b19
Dijkstra/Control/Monad/Hom.lean
MonadHom.naturality
[49, 1]
[53, 24]
conv => lhs; rw [map_eq_pure_bind, F.app_bind]; rhs; ext a; dsimp; rw [F.app_pure]
case h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² x : m Ξ± ⊒ app F (f <$> x) = f <$> app F x
case h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² x : m Ξ± ⊒ (do let a ← app F x pure (f a)) = f <$> app F x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² x : m Ξ± ⊒ app F (f <$> x) = f <$> app F x TACTIC:
https://github.com/Junology/dijkstra.git
81543f27ea34811910c10871ecf7e6243f952b19
Dijkstra/Control/Monad/Hom.lean
MonadHom.naturality
[49, 1]
[53, 24]
rw [map_eq_pure_bind]
case h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² x : m Ξ± ⊒ (do let a ← app F x pure (f a)) = f <$> app F x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h m : Type u β†’ Type v inst✝³ : Monad m inst✝² : LawfulMonad m n : Type u β†’ Type w inst✝¹ : Monad n inst✝ : LawfulMonad n F : MonadHom m n Ξ± Ξ² : Type u f : Ξ± β†’ Ξ² x : m Ξ± ⊒ (do let a ← app F x pure (f a)) = f <$> app F x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
by_contra h
a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a ⊒ βˆƒ C N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) = C
a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : Β¬βˆƒ C N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) = C ⊒ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a ⊒ βˆƒ C N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) = C TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
simp only [not_exists, not_forall] at h
a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : Β¬βˆƒ C N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) = C ⊒ False
a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x ⊒ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : Β¬βˆƒ C N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) = C ⊒ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
rcases h (a 0).succ with ⟨N, h⟩
a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (C : β„•), βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 ⊒ False
case intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h✝ : βˆ€ (C : β„•), βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 N : β„• h : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (a 0).succ ≀ a 0 ⊒ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (C : β„•), βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 ⊒ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
exact (h 0).not_lt (Nat.lt_add_left _ (a 0).lt_succ_self)
case intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h✝ : βˆ€ (C : β„•), βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 N : β„• h : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (a 0).succ ≀ a 0 ⊒ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h✝ : βˆ€ (C : β„•), βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 N : β„• h : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (a 0).succ ≀ a 0 ⊒ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
induction' C with C hC
a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C : β„• ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0
case zero a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + 0 ≀ a 0 case succ a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C : β„• hC : βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C : β„• ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
exact ⟨0, Ξ» n ↦ ha n.zero_le⟩
case zero a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + 0 ≀ a 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case zero a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + 0 ≀ a 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
rcases hC with ⟨N, hC⟩
case succ a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C : β„• hC : βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
case succ.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C : β„• hC : βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
rcases (hC 0).lt_or_eq with h0 | h0
case succ.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
case succ.intro.inl a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C < a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0 case succ.intro.inr a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
refine ⟨N, Ξ» n ↦ h0.trans_le' (Nat.add_le_add_right (ha ?_) C)⟩
case succ.intro.inl a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C < a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
case succ.intro.inl a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C < a 0 n : β„• ⊒ 0 + N ≀ n + N
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ.intro.inl a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C < a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
exact Nat.add_le_add_right n.zero_le N
case succ.intro.inl a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C < a 0 n : β„• ⊒ 0 + N ≀ n + N
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ.intro.inl a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C < a 0 n : β„• ⊒ 0 + N ≀ n + N TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
rcases h (a 0 - C) N with ⟨K, h1⟩
case succ.intro.inr a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a 0 - C ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ.intro.inr a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
rw [← h0, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.zero_add] at h1
case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a 0 - C ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a 0 - C ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
refine ⟨K + N, Ξ» n ↦ Nat.add_one_le_iff.mpr ?_⟩
case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0
case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N n : β„• ⊒ (a (n + (K + N))).add C < a 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N ⊒ βˆƒ N, βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + (C + 1) ≀ a 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
rw [← h0, Nat.zero_add]
case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N n : β„• ⊒ (a (n + (K + N))).add C < a 0
case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N n : β„• ⊒ (a (n + (K + N))).add C < a N + C
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N n : β„• ⊒ (a (n + (K + N))).add C < a 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
refine Nat.add_lt_add_right ((ha <| (K + N).le_add_left n).trans_lt ?_) C
case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N n : β„• ⊒ (a (n + (K + N))).add C < a N + C
case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N n : β„• ⊒ a (K + N) < a N
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N n : β„• ⊒ (a (n + (K + N))).add C < a N + C TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/Extra/NatSequence/AntitoneConst.lean
IMOSL.Extra.NatSeq_antitone_imp_const
[19, 1]
[35, 60]
exact (ha (N.le_add_left K)).lt_of_ne h1
case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N n : β„• ⊒ a (K + N) < a N
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ.intro.inr.intro a : β„• β†’ β„• ha : Antitone a h : βˆ€ (x x_1 : β„•), βˆƒ x_2, Β¬a (x_2 + x_1) = x C N : β„• hC : βˆ€ (n : β„•), a (n + N) + C ≀ a 0 h0 : a (0 + N) + C = a 0 K : β„• h1 : Β¬a (K + N) = a N n : β„• ⊒ a (K + N) < a N TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
have h1 : βˆ€ t n, n ≀ f^[t] n := Nat.rec Nat.le_refl Ξ» t h1 n ↦ (h0 n).trans (h1 _)
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n ⊒ f = id
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n ⊒ f = id
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n ⊒ f = id TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
have h2 : StrictMono f := strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ Ξ» n ↦ (h1 _ (f n)).trans_lt (h n)
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n ⊒ f = id
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n h2 : StrictMono f ⊒ f = id
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n ⊒ f = id TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
refine funext Ξ» n ↦ (h0 n).antisymm' ?_
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n h2 : StrictMono f ⊒ f = id
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n h2 : StrictMono f n : β„• ⊒ f n ≀ n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n h2 : StrictMono f ⊒ f = id TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← h2.lt_iff_lt]
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n h2 : StrictMono f n : β„• ⊒ f n ≀ n
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n h2 : StrictMono f n : β„• ⊒ f (f n) < f n.succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n h2 : StrictMono f n : β„• ⊒ f n ≀ n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
exact (h1 _ _).trans_lt (h n)
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n h2 : StrictMono f n : β„• ⊒ f (f n) < f n.succ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n h1 : βˆ€ (t n : β„•), n ≀ f^[t] n h2 : StrictMono f n : β„• ⊒ f (f n) < f n.succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
suffices βˆ€ k n : β„•, k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n from Ξ» n ↦ this n n n.le_refl
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) ⊒ βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) ⊒ βˆ€ (k n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) ⊒ βˆ€ (n : β„•), n ≀ f n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
refine Nat.rec (Ξ» k _ ↦ (f k).zero_le) (Ξ» k h0 n h1 ↦ ?_)
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) ⊒ βˆ€ (k n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n ⊒ k.succ ≀ f n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) ⊒ βˆ€ (k n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
rcases n with _ | n
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n ⊒ k.succ ≀ f n
case zero f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n h1 : k.succ ≀ 0 ⊒ k.succ ≀ f 0 case succ f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n + 1 ⊒ k.succ ≀ f (n + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n ⊒ k.succ ≀ f n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
exact absurd k.succ_pos h1.not_lt
case zero f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n h1 : k.succ ≀ 0 ⊒ k.succ ≀ f 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case zero f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n h1 : k.succ ≀ 0 ⊒ k.succ ≀ f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
refine (h n).trans_le' ?_
case succ f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n + 1 ⊒ k.succ ≀ f (n + 1)
case succ f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n + 1 ⊒ k ≀ f^[g n + 2] n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n + 1 ⊒ k.succ ≀ f (n + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
generalize g n + 2 = t
case succ f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n + 1 ⊒ k ≀ f^[g n + 2] n
case succ f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n + 1 t : β„• ⊒ k ≀ f^[t] n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n + 1 ⊒ k ≀ f^[g n + 2] n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.main_step
[28, 1]
[46, 32]
exact t.rec (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp h1) (Ξ» t h2 ↦ (h0 _ h2).trans_eq (f.iterate_succ_apply' _ _).symm)
case succ f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n + 1 t : β„• ⊒ k ≀ f^[t] n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) k : β„• h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), k ≀ n β†’ k ≀ f n n : β„• h1 : k.succ ≀ n + 1 t : β„• ⊒ k ≀ f^[t] n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
refine Iff.symm ⟨λ h k ↦ ?_, Ξ» h ↦ ?_⟩
f g : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ (βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1)) ↔ f = id ∧ g = fun x => 0
case refine_1 f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : f = id ∧ g = fun x => 0 k : β„• ⊒ f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) case refine_2 f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) ⊒ f = id ∧ g = fun x => 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ (βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1)) ↔ f = id ∧ g = fun x => 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
rcases h with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
case refine_1 f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : f = id ∧ g = fun x => 0 k : β„• ⊒ f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1)
case refine_1.intro k : β„• ⊒ id^[(fun x => 0) k + 2] k + ((fun x => 0)^[id k + 1] k + (fun x => 0) (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : f = id ∧ g = fun x => 0 k : β„• ⊒ f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
rw [iterate_id, iterate_succ_apply']
case refine_1.intro k : β„• ⊒ id^[(fun x => 0) k + 2] k + ((fun x => 0)^[id k + 1] k + (fun x => 0) (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1)
case refine_1.intro k : β„• ⊒ id k + (0 + (fun x => 0) (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.intro k : β„• ⊒ id^[(fun x => 0) k + 2] k + ((fun x => 0)^[id k + 1] k + (fun x => 0) (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
rfl
case refine_1.intro k : β„• ⊒ id k + (0 + (fun x => 0) (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.intro k : β„• ⊒ id k + (0 + (fun x => 0) (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
obtain rfl : f = id := by refine main_step (g := g) (Ξ» k ↦ ?_) rw [← h, Nat.lt_succ_iff] exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
case refine_2 f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) ⊒ f = id ∧ g = fun x => 0
case refine_2 g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), id^[g k + 2] k + (g^[id k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1) ⊒ id = id ∧ g = fun x => 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) ⊒ f = id ∧ g = fun x => 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
refine ⟨rfl, funext Ξ» n ↦ ?_⟩
case refine_2 g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), id^[g k + 2] k + (g^[id k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1) ⊒ id = id ∧ g = fun x => 0
case refine_2 g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), id^[g k + 2] k + (g^[id k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1) n : β„• ⊒ g n = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), id^[g k + 2] k + (g^[id k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1) ⊒ id = id ∧ g = fun x => 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
simp_rw [iterate_id, Function.id_def, Nat.succ_inj', add_right_eq_self, add_eq_zero_iff] at h
case refine_2 g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), id^[g k + 2] k + (g^[id k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1) n : β„• ⊒ g n = 0
case refine_2 g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), g^[k + 1] k = 0 ∧ g (k + 1) = 0 ⊒ g n = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), id^[g k + 2] k + (g^[id k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = id (k + 1) n : β„• ⊒ g n = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
rcases n with _ | n
case refine_2 g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), g^[k + 1] k = 0 ∧ g (k + 1) = 0 ⊒ g n = 0
case refine_2.zero g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), g^[k + 1] k = 0 ∧ g (k + 1) = 0 ⊒ g 0 = 0 case refine_2.succ g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), g^[k + 1] k = 0 ∧ g (k + 1) = 0 n : β„• ⊒ g (n + 1) = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), g^[k + 1] k = 0 ∧ g (k + 1) = 0 ⊒ g n = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
exacts [(h 0).1, (h n).2]
case refine_2.zero g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), g^[k + 1] k = 0 ∧ g (k + 1) = 0 ⊒ g 0 = 0 case refine_2.succ g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), g^[k + 1] k = 0 ∧ g (k + 1) = 0 n : β„• ⊒ g (n + 1) = 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.zero g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), g^[k + 1] k = 0 ∧ g (k + 1) = 0 ⊒ g 0 = 0 case refine_2.succ g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), g^[k + 1] k = 0 ∧ g (k + 1) = 0 n : β„• ⊒ g (n + 1) = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
refine main_step (g := g) (Ξ» k ↦ ?_)
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) ⊒ f = id
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) k : β„• ⊒ f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) ⊒ f = id TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
rw [← h, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) k : β„• ⊒ f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1)
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) k : β„• ⊒ f^[g k + 2] k ≀ f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) k : β„• ⊒ f^[g k + 2] k < f (k + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution
[49, 1]
[63, 30]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) k : β„• ⊒ f^[g k + 2] k ≀ f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„• β†’ β„• h : βˆ€ (k : β„•), f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) + 1 = f (k + 1) k : β„• ⊒ f^[g k + 2] k ≀ f^[g k + 2] k + (g^[f k + 1] k + g (k + 1)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.PNat_exists_Nat_conj
[74, 1]
[77, 53]
simp_rw [PNat.succPNat_natPred]
f : β„•+ β†’ β„•+ n : β„•+ ⊒ f n = ((fun n => (f n.succPNat).natPred) n.natPred).succPNat
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„•+ β†’ β„•+ n : β„•+ ⊒ f n = ((fun n => (f n.succPNat).natPred) n.natPred).succPNat TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.PNat_eq_Nat_conj_iff
[79, 1]
[82, 80]
rw [h, PNat.succPNat_natPred, PNat.succPNat_natPred]
f : β„•+ β†’ β„•+ g : β„• β†’ β„• h : g = fun n => (f n.succPNat).natPred n : β„•+ ⊒ f n = (g n.natPred).succPNat
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„•+ β†’ β„•+ g : β„• β†’ β„• h : g = fun n => (f n.succPNat).natPred n : β„•+ ⊒ f n = (g n.natPred).succPNat TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.PNat_Nat_conj_iterate
[84, 1]
[88, 52]
rw [iterate_succ_apply', iterate_succ_apply', PNat_Nat_conj_iterate f m k]
f : β„• β†’ β„• m : β„•+ k : β„• ⊒ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[k + 1] m = (f^[k + 1] m.natPred).succPNat
f : β„• β†’ β„• m : β„•+ k : β„• ⊒ (f (f^[k] m.natPred).succPNat.natPred).succPNat = (f (f^[k] m.natPred)).succPNat
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• m : β„•+ k : β„• ⊒ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[k + 1] m = (f^[k + 1] m.natPred).succPNat TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.PNat_Nat_conj_iterate
[84, 1]
[88, 52]
rfl
f : β„• β†’ β„• m : β„•+ k : β„• ⊒ (f (f^[k] m.natPred).succPNat.natPred).succPNat = (f (f^[k] m.natPred)).succPNat
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• m : β„•+ k : β„• ⊒ (f (f^[k] m.natPred).succPNat.natPred).succPNat = (f (f^[k] m.natPred)).succPNat TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution_PNat
[91, 1]
[101, 29]
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := PNat_exists_Nat_conj f
f g : β„•+ β†’ β„•+ ⊒ (βˆ€ (n : β„•+), f^[↑(g n) + 1] n + (g^[↑(f n)] n + g (n + 1)) = f (n + 1) + 1) ↔ f = id ∧ g = fun x => 1
case intro g : β„•+ β†’ β„•+ f : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ (βˆ€ (n : β„•+), (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑(g n) + 1] n + (g^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n)] n + g (n + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n + 1) + 1) ↔ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) = id ∧ g = fun x => 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f g : β„•+ β†’ β„•+ ⊒ (βˆ€ (n : β„•+), f^[↑(g n) + 1] n + (g^[↑(f n)] n + g (n + 1)) = f (n + 1) + 1) ↔ f = id ∧ g = fun x => 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution_PNat
[91, 1]
[101, 29]
obtain ⟨g, rfl⟩ := PNat_exists_Nat_conj g
case intro g : β„•+ β†’ β„•+ f : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ (βˆ€ (n : β„•+), (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑(g n) + 1] n + (g^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n)] n + g (n + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n + 1) + 1) ↔ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) = id ∧ g = fun x => 1
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ (βˆ€ (n : β„•+), (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n) + 1] n + ((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n)] n + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n + 1) + 1) ↔ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) = id ∧ (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) = fun x => 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro g : β„•+ β†’ β„•+ f : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ (βˆ€ (n : β„•+), (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑(g n) + 1] n + (g^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n)] n + g (n + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n + 1) + 1) ↔ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) = id ∧ g = fun x => 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution_PNat
[91, 1]
[101, 29]
rw [eq_comm, PNat_eq_Nat_conj_iff, eq_comm (b := Ξ» _ ↦ 1), PNat_eq_Nat_conj_iff, PNat_to_Nat_prop, Iff.comm]
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ (βˆ€ (n : β„•+), (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n) + 1] n + ((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n)] n + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n + 1) + 1) ↔ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) = id ∧ (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) = fun x => 1
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ ((f = fun n => (id n.succPNat).natPred) ∧ g = fun n => PNat.natPred 1) ↔ βˆ€ (n : β„•), (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat) + 1] n.succPNat + ((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat)] n.succPNat + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1) + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ (βˆ€ (n : β„•+), (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n) + 1] n + ((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n)] n + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n + 1) + 1) ↔ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) = id ∧ (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) = fun x => 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution_PNat
[91, 1]
[101, 29]
refine final_solution.symm.trans <| forall_congr' (Ξ» n ↦ ?_)
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ ((f = fun n => (id n.succPNat).natPred) ∧ g = fun n => PNat.natPred 1) ↔ βˆ€ (n : β„•), (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat) + 1] n.succPNat + ((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat)] n.succPNat + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1) + 1
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 = f (n + 1) ↔ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat) + 1] n.succPNat + ((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat)] n.succPNat + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1) + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• ⊒ ((f = fun n => (id n.succPNat).natPred) ∧ g = fun n => PNat.natPred 1) ↔ βˆ€ (n : β„•), (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat) + 1] n.succPNat + ((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat)] n.succPNat + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1) + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution_PNat
[91, 1]
[101, 29]
rw [← PNat.coe_inj, PNat_Nat_conj_iterate, PNat_Nat_conj_iterate]
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 = f (n + 1) ↔ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat) + 1] n.succPNat + ((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat)] n.succPNat + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1) + 1
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 = f (n + 1) ↔ ↑((f^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat) + 1] n.succPNat.natPred).succPNat + ((g^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat)] n.succPNat.natPred).succPNat + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1))) = ↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1) + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 = f (n + 1) ↔ (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat) + 1] n.succPNat + ((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat)^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat)] n.succPNat + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1)) = (fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1) + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution_PNat
[91, 1]
[101, 29]
simp_rw [Nat.natPred_succPNat, PNat.add_coe, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.succ_add]
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 = f (n + 1) ↔ ↑((f^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat) + 1] n.succPNat.natPred).succPNat + ((g^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat)] n.succPNat.natPred).succPNat + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1))) = ↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1) + 1)
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 = f (n + 1) ↔ (f^[(g n + 1).succ] n + (g^[(f n).succ] n + (g (n.succPNat + 1).natPred).succ).succ).succ = (f (n.succPNat + 1).natPred + ↑1).succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 = f (n + 1) ↔ ↑((f^[↑((fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat) + 1] n.succPNat.natPred).succPNat + ((g^[↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) n.succPNat)] n.succPNat.natPred).succPNat + (fun n => (g n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1))) = ↑((fun n => (f n.natPred).succPNat) (n.succPNat + 1) + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution_PNat
[91, 1]
[101, 29]
rw [← add_left_inj 2]
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 = f (n + 1) ↔ (f^[(g n + 1).succ] n + (g^[(f n).succ] n + (g (n.succPNat + 1).natPred).succ).succ).succ = (f (n.succPNat + 1).natPred + ↑1).succ
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 + 2 = f (n + 1) + 2 ↔ (f^[(g n + 1).succ] n + (g^[(f n).succ] n + (g (n.succPNat + 1).natPred).succ).succ).succ = (f (n.succPNat + 1).natPred + ↑1).succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 = f (n + 1) ↔ (f^[(g n + 1).succ] n + (g^[(f n).succ] n + (g (n.succPNat + 1).natPred).succ).succ).succ = (f (n.succPNat + 1).natPred + ↑1).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2011/A4/A4.lean
IMOSL.IMO2011A4.final_solution_PNat
[91, 1]
[101, 29]
rfl
case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 + 2 = f (n + 1) + 2 ↔ (f^[(g n + 1).succ] n + (g^[(f n).succ] n + (g (n.succPNat + 1).natPred).succ).succ).succ = (f (n.succPNat + 1).natPred + ↑1).succ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro f g : β„• β†’ β„• n : β„• ⊒ f^[g n + 2] n + (g^[f n + 1] n + g (n + 1)) + 1 + 2 = f (n + 1) + 2 ↔ (f^[(g n + 1).succ] n + (g^[(f n).succ] n + (g (n.succPNat + 1).natPred).succ).succ).succ = (f (n.succPNat + 1).natPred + ↑1).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_eq
[61, 1]
[64, 52]
rw [f.iterate_succ_apply, h, ← h n, ← f.iterate_succ_apply']
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• ⊒ f^[4] (n + 1) = f^[4] n + 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• ⊒ f^[4] (n + 1) = f^[4] n + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_eq
[61, 1]
[64, 52]
rw [Nat.add_succ, h0, h1]
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), f^[4] (n + 1) = f^[4] n + 1 n : β„• h1 : f^[4] n = f^[4] 0 + n ⊒ f^[4] n.succ = f^[4] 0 + n.succ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), f^[4] (n + 1) = f^[4] n + 1 n : β„• h1 : f^[4] n = f^[4] 0 + n ⊒ f^[4] n.succ = f^[4] 0 + n.succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.good_injective
[66, 1]
[68, 76]
rwa [iter_four_eq h, iter_four_eq h n, add_right_inj] at h0
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f m n : β„• h0 : f^[4] m = f^[4] n ⊒ m = n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f m n : β„• h0 : f^[4] m = f^[4] n ⊒ m = n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
intro x h0
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f ⊒ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ x ∈ {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f ⊒ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_insert, mem_singleton, or_assoc]
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ x ∈ {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ x = 0 ∨ x = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ x ∈ {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
refine x.eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred.imp id Ξ» h1 ↦ ?_
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ x = 0 ∨ x = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : x = x.pred.succ ⊒ x = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ x = 0 ∨ x = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
generalize x.pred = c at h1
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : x = x.pred.succ ⊒ x = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 c : β„• h1 : x = c.succ ⊒ x = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : x = x.pred.succ ⊒ x = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
subst h1
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 c : β„• h1 : x = c.succ ⊒ x = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f c : β„• h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ c.succ = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = c.succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f x : β„• h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 c : β„• h1 : x = c.succ ⊒ x = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
refine (em <| c ∈ Set.range f).imp (Ξ» h1 ↦ ?_) (Ξ» h1 ↦ ⟨c, ?_, rfl⟩)
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f c : β„• h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ c.succ = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = c.succ
case refine_1 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f c : β„• h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c ∈ Set.range f ⊒ c.succ = (f 0).succ case refine_2 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f c : β„• h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c βˆ‰ Set.range f ⊒ c ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f c : β„• h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ c.succ = (f 0).succ ∨ βˆƒ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = c.succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
rcases h1 with ⟨d, rfl⟩
case refine_1 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f c : β„• h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c ∈ Set.range f ⊒ c.succ = (f 0).succ
case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f c : β„• h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c ∈ Set.range f ⊒ c.succ = (f 0).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
refine d.eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred.elim (Ξ» h2 ↦ h2 β–Έ rfl) (Ξ» h2 ↦ ?_)
case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊒ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊒ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
rw [(finChainFnOfgood h).mem_iterRangeCompl_iff] at h0
case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊒ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ βˆ‰ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊒ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊒ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
refine absurd ⟨d.pred, ?_⟩ h0
case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ βˆ‰ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊒ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ βˆ‰ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊒ f^[3] d.pred = (f d).succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ βˆ‰ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊒ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
rw [h, ← d.pred.succ_eq_add_one, ← h2]
case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ βˆ‰ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊒ f^[3] d.pred = (f d).succ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f d : β„• h0 : (f d).succ βˆ‰ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊒ f^[3] d.pred = (f d).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
rwa [(finChainFnOfgood h).mem_rangeCompl_iff]
case refine_2 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f c : β„• h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c βˆ‰ Set.range f ⊒ c ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f c : β„• h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c βˆ‰ Set.range f ⊒ c ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
have h0 := (card_le_card <| iterRangeCompl_three_subset h).trans <| (card_union_le _ _).trans <| Nat.add_le_add (card_pair (f 0).succ_ne_zero.symm).le card_image_le
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0 : ((finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3).card ≀ 2 + (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
rw [(finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl_card, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, mul_comm, ← Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.succ_pos 1)] at h0
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0 : ((finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3).card ≀ 2 + (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0 : ((finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3).card ≀ 2 + (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
refine h0.eq_or_lt.elim card_eq_one.mp (Ξ» h0 ↦ ?_)
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card < 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
rw [Nat.lt_one_iff, card_eq_zero, ← (finChainFnOfgood h).surjective_iff] at h0
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card < 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : Function.Surjective f ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card < 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
obtain ⟨a, h0⟩ := h0.iterate 3 0
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : Function.Surjective f ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0✝¹ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0✝ : Function.Surjective f a : β„• h0 : f^[3] a = 0 ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : Function.Surjective f ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
exact absurd ((h a).symm.trans h0) (f a.succ).succ_ne_zero
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0✝¹ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0✝ : Function.Surjective f a : β„• h0 : f^[3] a = 0 ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f h0✝¹ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≀ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0✝ : Function.Surjective f a : β„• h0 : f^[3] a = 0 ⊒ βˆƒ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
obtain ⟨a, h0⟩ := exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton h
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f ⊒ f^[4] 0 = 4
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊒ f^[4] 0 = 4
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f ⊒ f^[4] 0 = 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
suffices (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 = range (f^[4] 0) by rw [← card_range (f^[4] 0), ← this, (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl_card, h0, card_singleton]
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊒ f^[4] 0 = 4
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊒ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 = range (f^[4] 0)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊒ f^[4] 0 = 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
ext n
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊒ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 = range (f^[4] 0)
case intro.a f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• ⊒ n ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 ↔ n ∈ range (f^[4] 0)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊒ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 = range (f^[4] 0) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
rw [(finChainFnOfgood h).mem_iterRangeCompl_iff, mem_range, not_iff_comm, not_lt]
case intro.a f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• ⊒ n ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 ↔ n ∈ range (f^[4] 0)
case intro.a f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• ⊒ f^[4] 0 ≀ n ↔ n ∈ Set.range f^[4]
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.a f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• ⊒ n ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 ↔ n ∈ range (f^[4] 0) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
refine ⟨λ h1 ↦ ⟨n - f^[4] 0, ?_⟩, Ξ» ⟨k, h1⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
case intro.a f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• ⊒ f^[4] 0 ≀ n ↔ n ∈ Set.range f^[4]
case intro.a.refine_1 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• h1 : f^[4] 0 ≀ n ⊒ f^[4] (n - f^[4] 0) = n case intro.a.refine_2 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• x✝ : n ∈ Set.range f^[4] k : β„• h1 : f^[4] k = n ⊒ f^[4] 0 ≀ n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.a f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• ⊒ f^[4] 0 ≀ n ↔ n ∈ Set.range f^[4] TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
rw [← card_range (f^[4] 0), ← this, (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl_card, h0, card_singleton]
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} this : (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 = range (f^[4] 0) ⊒ f^[4] 0 = 4
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} this : (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 = range (f^[4] 0) ⊒ f^[4] 0 = 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
rw [iter_four_eq h, Nat.add_sub_of_le h1]
case intro.a.refine_1 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• h1 : f^[4] 0 ≀ n ⊒ f^[4] (n - f^[4] 0) = n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.a.refine_1 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• h1 : f^[4] 0 ≀ n ⊒ f^[4] (n - f^[4] 0) = n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
rw [← h1, iter_four_eq h k]
case intro.a.refine_2 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• x✝ : n ∈ Set.range f^[4] k : β„• h1 : f^[4] k = n ⊒ f^[4] 0 ≀ n
case intro.a.refine_2 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• x✝ : n ∈ Set.range f^[4] k : β„• h1 : f^[4] k = n ⊒ f^[4] 0 ≀ f^[4] 0 + k
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.a.refine_2 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• x✝ : n ∈ Set.range f^[4] k : β„• h1 : f^[4] k = n ⊒ f^[4] 0 ≀ n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ k
case intro.a.refine_2 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• x✝ : n ∈ Set.range f^[4] k : β„• h1 : f^[4] k = n ⊒ f^[4] 0 ≀ f^[4] 0 + k
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.a.refine_2 f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : β„• x✝ : n ∈ Set.range f^[4] k : β„• h1 : f^[4] k = n ⊒ f^[4] 0 ≀ f^[4] 0 + k TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_eq_add_four
[116, 1]
[117, 58]
rw [iter_four_eq h, add_comm, iter_four_zero_eq_four h]
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• ⊒ f^[4] n = n + 4
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• ⊒ f^[4] n = n + 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.map_add_four
[119, 1]
[121, 23]
have h1 := iter_four_eq_add_four h
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• ⊒ f (n + 4) = f n + 4
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• h1 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), f^[4] n = n + 4 ⊒ f (n + 4) = f n + 4
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• ⊒ f (n + 4) = f n + 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.map_add_four
[119, 1]
[121, 23]
rw [← h1, ← h1]
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• h1 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), f^[4] n = n + 4 ⊒ f (n + 4) = f n + 4
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• h1 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), f^[4] n = n + 4 ⊒ f (f^[4] n) = f^[4] (f n)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• h1 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), f^[4] n = n + 4 ⊒ f (n + 4) = f n + 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.map_add_four
[119, 1]
[121, 23]
rfl
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• h1 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), f^[4] n = n + 4 ⊒ f (f^[4] n) = f^[4] (f n)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f n : β„• h1 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), f^[4] n = n + 4 ⊒ f (f^[4] n) = f^[4] (f n) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.good_imp_succ_or_answer2
[123, 1]
[168, 38]
rcases exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton h with ⟨a, h0⟩
f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.good_imp_succ_or_answer2
[123, 1]
[168, 38]
have h1 := iterRangeCompl_three_subset h
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} h1 : (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.good_imp_succ_or_answer2
[123, 1]
[168, 38]
let C := finChainFnOfgood h
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} h1 : (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} h1 : (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} h1 : (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.good_imp_succ_or_answer2
[123, 1]
[168, 38]
rw [C.iterRangeCompl_succ, C.iterRangeCompl_succ, C.iterRangeCompl_one] at h1
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} h1 : (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : C.exactIterRange 2 βˆͺ (C.exactIterRange 1 βˆͺ C.rangeCompl) βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} h1 : (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.good_imp_succ_or_answer2
[123, 1]
[168, 38]
unfold FinChainFn.exactIterRange at h1
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : C.exactIterRange 2 βˆͺ (C.exactIterRange 1 βˆͺ C.rangeCompl) βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : image f^[2] C.rangeCompl βˆͺ (image f^[1] C.rangeCompl βˆͺ C.rangeCompl) βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : C.exactIterRange 2 βˆͺ (C.exactIterRange 1 βˆͺ C.rangeCompl) βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.good_imp_succ_or_answer2
[123, 1]
[168, 38]
rw [h0, image_singleton, image_singleton, image_singleton, union_subset_iff, union_subset_iff, f.iterate_succ_apply, f.iterate_one] at h1
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : image f^[2] C.rangeCompl βˆͺ (image f^[1] C.rangeCompl βˆͺ C.rangeCompl) βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : {f (f a)} βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ {a.succ} ∧ {f a} βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ {a.succ} ∧ {a} βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ {a.succ} ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : image f^[2] C.rangeCompl βˆͺ (image f^[1] C.rangeCompl βˆͺ C.rangeCompl) βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.good_imp_succ_or_answer2
[123, 1]
[168, 38]
iterate 3 rw [singleton_subset_iff, mem_union, mem_singleton, mem_insert, mem_singleton] at h1
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : {f (f a)} βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ {a.succ} ∧ {f a} βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ {a.succ} ∧ {a} βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ {a.succ} ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : ((f (f a) = 0 ∨ f (f a) = (f 0).succ) ∨ f (f a) = a.succ) ∧ ((f a = 0 ∨ f a = (f 0).succ) ∨ f a = a.succ) ∧ ((a = 0 ∨ a = (f 0).succ) ∨ a = a.succ) ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : {f (f a)} βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ {a.succ} ∧ {f a} βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ {a.succ} ∧ {a} βŠ† {0, (f 0).succ} βˆͺ {a.succ} ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.good_imp_succ_or_answer2
[123, 1]
[168, 38]
have h2 : βˆ€ n, f (f n) β‰  n := Ξ» n h2 ↦ by apply absurd (iter_four_eq_add_four h n) change f (f (f (f n))) β‰  n + 4 rw [h2, h2, self_ne_add_right] exact Nat.succ_ne_zero 3
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : ((f (f a) = 0 ∨ f (f a) = (f 0).succ) ∨ f (f a) = a.succ) ∧ ((f a = 0 ∨ f a = (f 0).succ) ∨ f a = a.succ) ∧ ((a = 0 ∨ a = (f 0).succ) ∨ a = a.succ) ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : ((f (f a) = 0 ∨ f (f a) = (f 0).succ) ∨ f (f a) = a.succ) ∧ ((f a = 0 ∨ f a = (f 0).succ) ∨ f a = a.succ) ∧ ((a = 0 ∨ a = (f 0).succ) ∨ a = a.succ) h2 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), f (f n) β‰  n ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : β„• β†’ β„• h : good f a : β„• h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} C : FinChainFn f := finChainFnOfgood h h1 : ((f (f a) = 0 ∨ f (f a) = (f 0).succ) ∨ f (f a) = a.succ) ∧ ((f a = 0 ∨ f a = (f 0).succ) ∨ f a = a.succ) ∧ ((a = 0 ∨ a = (f 0).succ) ∨ a = a.succ) ⊒ f = Nat.succ ∨ f = answer2 TACTIC: