url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.pos_part_mul_pos_part_main_formula
[53, 1]
[70, 50]
exact max_le h0 (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (sq_nonneg a) h0)
case inr.inl.h.h R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : b ≤ 0 ⊢ max b (a ^ 2 * b) ≤ 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.inl.h.h R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : b ≤ 0 ⊢ max b (a ^ 2 * b) ≤ 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.pos_part_mul_pos_part_main_formula
[53, 1]
[70, 50]
have h1 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_one_sq b) h
case inr.inr.refine_1 R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : 0 ≤ b ⊢ a * b ≤ max a (a * b ^ 2)
case inr.inr.refine_1 R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : 0 ≤ b h1 : a * b ≤ a * max 1 (b ^ 2) ⊢ a * b ≤ max a (a * b ^ 2)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.inr.refine_1 R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : 0 ≤ b ⊢ a * b ≤ max a (a * b ^ 2) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.pos_part_mul_pos_part_main_formula
[53, 1]
[70, 50]
rwa [mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ h, mul_one] at h1
case inr.inr.refine_1 R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : 0 ≤ b h1 : a * b ≤ a * max 1 (b ^ 2) ⊢ a * b ≤ max a (a * b ^ 2)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.inr.refine_1 R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : 0 ≤ b h1 : a * b ≤ a * max 1 (b ^ 2) ⊢ a * b ≤ max a (a * b ^ 2) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.pos_part_mul_pos_part_main_formula
[53, 1]
[70, 50]
have h1 := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_one_sq a) h0
case inr.inr.refine_2 R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : 0 ≤ b ⊢ a * b ≤ max b (a ^ 2 * b)
case inr.inr.refine_2 R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : 0 ≤ b h1 : a * b ≤ max 1 (a ^ 2) * b ⊢ a * b ≤ max b (a ^ 2 * b)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.inr.refine_2 R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : 0 ≤ b ⊢ a * b ≤ max b (a ^ 2 * b) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.pos_part_mul_pos_part_main_formula
[53, 1]
[70, 50]
rwa [max_mul_of_nonneg _ _ h0, one_mul] at h1
case inr.inr.refine_2 R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : 0 ≤ b h1 : a * b ≤ max 1 (a ^ 2) * b ⊢ a * b ≤ max b (a ^ 2 * b)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr.inr.refine_2 R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a b : R h : 0 ≤ a h0 : 0 ≤ b h1 : a * b ≤ max 1 (a ^ 2) * b ⊢ a * b ≤ max b (a ^ 2 * b) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_closure_pos_part_mul_closure_pos_part_mem
[144, 1]
[153, 69]
rw [inf_pos_part, Pi_inf_mul_pos_part]
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝¹ : (i : I) → R i hg : a✝¹ ∈ S a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) ((a✝ ⊓ b✝)⁺ * a✝¹⁺)
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝¹ : (i : I) → R i hg : a✝¹ ∈ S a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺ ⊓ b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝¹ : (i : I) → R i hg : a✝¹ ∈ S a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) ((a✝ ⊓ b✝)⁺ * a✝¹⁺) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_closure_pos_part_mul_closure_pos_part_mem
[144, 1]
[153, 69]
exact ofInf
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝¹ : (i : I) → R i hg : a✝¹ ∈ S a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺ ⊓ b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝¹ : (i : I) → R i hg : a✝¹ ∈ S a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺ ⊓ b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_closure_pos_part_mul_closure_pos_part_mem
[144, 1]
[153, 69]
rw [sup_pos_part, Pi_sup_mul_pos_part]
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝¹ : (i : I) → R i hg : a✝¹ ∈ S a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) ((a✝ ⊔ b✝)⁺ * a✝¹⁺)
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝¹ : (i : I) → R i hg : a✝¹ ∈ S a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺ ⊔ b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝¹ : (i : I) → R i hg : a✝¹ ∈ S a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) ((a✝ ⊔ b✝)⁺ * a✝¹⁺) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_closure_pos_part_mul_closure_pos_part_mem
[144, 1]
[153, 69]
exact ofSup
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝¹ : (i : I) → R i hg : a✝¹ ∈ S a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺ ⊔ b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝¹ : (i : I) → R i hg : a✝¹ ∈ S a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (a✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺ ⊔ b✝⁺ * a✝¹⁺) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_closure_pos_part_mul_closure_pos_part_mem
[144, 1]
[153, 69]
rw [inf_pos_part, Pi_pos_part_mul_inf]
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * b✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * (a✝ ⊓ b✝)⁺)
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * b✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺ ⊓ f⁺ * b✝⁺)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * b✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * (a✝ ⊓ b✝)⁺) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_closure_pos_part_mul_closure_pos_part_mem
[144, 1]
[153, 69]
exact ofInf
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * b✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺ ⊓ f⁺ * b✝⁺)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * b✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺ ⊓ f⁺ * b✝⁺) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_closure_pos_part_mul_closure_pos_part_mem
[144, 1]
[153, 69]
rw [sup_pos_part, Pi_pos_part_mul_sup]
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * b✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * (a✝ ⊔ b✝)⁺)
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * b✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺ ⊔ f⁺ * b✝⁺)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * b✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * (a✝ ⊔ b✝)⁺) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_closure_pos_part_mul_closure_pos_part_mem
[144, 1]
[153, 69]
exact ofSup
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * b✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺ ⊔ f⁺ * b✝⁺)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g a✝ b✝ : (i : I) → R i x✝¹ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) a✝ x✝ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) b✝ ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * b✝⁺) → MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * a✝⁺ ⊔ f⁺ * b✝⁺) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_mul_mem
[155, 1]
[164, 70]
rw [← posPart_sub_negPart f, sub_mul, ← posPart_sub_negPart g, mul_sub, mul_sub]
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f * g)
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f * g) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_mul_mem
[155, 1]
[164, 70]
let T := S.toAddSubgroup
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻))
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g T : AddSubgroup ((i : I) → R i) := S.toAddSubgroup ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_mul_mem
[155, 1]
[164, 70]
have hf₀ : MetaClosure (λ x ↦ x ∈ S) (-f) := neg_mem T hf
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g T : AddSubgroup ((i : I) → R i) := S.toAddSubgroup ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻))
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g T : AddSubgroup ((i : I) → R i) := S.toAddSubgroup hf₀ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (-f) ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g T : AddSubgroup ((i : I) → R i) := S.toAddSubgroup ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_mul_mem
[155, 1]
[164, 70]
have hg₀ : MetaClosure (λ x ↦ x ∈ S) (-g) := neg_mem T hg
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g T : AddSubgroup ((i : I) → R i) := S.toAddSubgroup hf₀ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (-f) ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻))
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g T : AddSubgroup ((i : I) → R i) := S.toAddSubgroup hf₀ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (-f) hg₀ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (-g) ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g T : AddSubgroup ((i : I) → R i) := S.toAddSubgroup hf₀ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (-f) ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/A7/A7PiRing.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012A7.MetaClosure.Pi_mul_mem
[155, 1]
[164, 70]
apply sub_mem T <;> apply sub_mem T <;> apply Pi_closure_pos_part_mul_closure_pos_part_mem <;> assumption
I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g T : AddSubgroup ((i : I) → R i) := S.toAddSubgroup hf₀ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (-f) hg₀ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (-g) ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: I : Type u_2 R : I → Type u_1 inst✝ : (i : I) → LinearOrderedRing (R i) S : Subring ((i : I) → R i) f g : (i : I) → R i hf : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) f hg : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) g T : AddSubgroup ((i : I) → R i) := S.toAddSubgroup hf₀ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (-f) hg₀ : MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (-g) ⊢ MetaClosure (fun x => x ∈ S) (f⁺ * g⁺ - f⁺ * g⁻ - (f⁻ * g⁺ - f⁻ * g⁻)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
replace h0 (k : ℕ) : (k.succ : F) / a k.succ ≤ a k + k / a k := by rw [add_div' _ _ _ (h k).ne.symm, div_le_div_iff (h _) (h k), ← sq] exact (div_le_iff' <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (pow_pos (h k) 2) k.cast_nonneg).mp (h0 k)
F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ * a k / (a k ^ 2 + ↑k) ≤ a k.succ ⊢ ∀ (n : ℕ), 2 ≤ n → ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a
F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ∀ (n : ℕ), 2 ≤ n → ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ * a k / (a k ^ 2 + ↑k) ≤ a k.succ ⊢ ∀ (n : ℕ), 2 ≤ n → ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ ?_
F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ∀ (n : ℕ), 2 ≤ n → ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ↑2 ≤ (range 2).sum a case refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ∀ (n : ℕ), 2 ≤ n → ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a → ↑(n + 1) ≤ (range (n + 1)).sum a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ∀ (n : ℕ), 2 ≤ n → ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rw [add_div' _ _ _ (h k).ne.symm, div_le_div_iff (h _) (h k), ← sq]
F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ * a k / (a k ^ 2 + ↑k) ≤ a k.succ k : ℕ ⊢ ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k
F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ * a k / (a k ^ 2 + ↑k) ≤ a k.succ k : ℕ ⊢ ↑k.succ * a k ≤ (a k ^ 2 + ↑k) * a k.succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ * a k / (a k ^ 2 + ↑k) ≤ a k.succ k : ℕ ⊢ ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
exact (div_le_iff' <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (pow_pos (h k) 2) k.cast_nonneg).mp (h0 k)
F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ * a k / (a k ^ 2 + ↑k) ≤ a k.succ k : ℕ ⊢ ↑k.succ * a k ≤ (a k ^ 2 + ↑k) * a k.succ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ * a k / (a k ^ 2 + ↑k) ≤ a k.succ k : ℕ ⊢ ↑k.succ * a k ≤ (a k ^ 2 + ↑k) * a k.succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rw [Nat.cast_two, sum_range_succ, sum_range_one]
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ↑2 ≤ (range 2).sum a
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ 2 ≤ a 0 + a 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ↑2 ≤ (range 2).sum a TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
specialize h0 0
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ 2 ≤ a 0 + a 1
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ↑(Nat.succ 0) / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 + ↑0 / a 0 ⊢ 2 ≤ a 0 + a 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ 2 ≤ a 0 + a 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rw [Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_zero, zero_div, add_zero] at h0
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ↑(Nat.succ 0) / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 + ↑0 / a 0 ⊢ 2 ≤ a 0 + a 1
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 ⊢ 2 ≤ a 0 + a 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ↑(Nat.succ 0) / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 + ↑0 / a 0 ⊢ 2 ≤ a 0 + a 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
apply (add_le_add_right h0 _).trans'
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 ⊢ 2 ≤ a 0 + a 1
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 ⊢ 2 ≤ 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) + a 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 ⊢ 2 ≤ a 0 + a 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rw [div_add' _ _ _ (h 1).ne.symm, le_div_iff (h 1), ← sq]
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 ⊢ 2 ≤ 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) + a 1
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 ⊢ 2 * a 1 ≤ 1 + a 1 ^ 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 ⊢ 2 ≤ 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) + a 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
have h1 := two_mul_le_add_sq 1 (a 1)
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 ⊢ 2 * a 1 ≤ 1 + a 1 ^ 2
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 h1 : 2 * 1 * a 1 ≤ 1 ^ 2 + a 1 ^ 2 ⊢ 2 * a 1 ≤ 1 + a 1 ^ 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 ⊢ 2 * a 1 ≤ 1 + a 1 ^ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rwa [mul_one, one_pow] at h1
case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 h1 : 2 * 1 * a 1 ≤ 1 ^ 2 + a 1 ^ 2 ⊢ 2 * a 1 ≤ 1 + a 1 ^ 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : 1 / a (Nat.succ 0) ≤ a 0 h1 : 2 * 1 * a 1 ≤ 1 ^ 2 + a 1 ^ 2 ⊢ 2 * a 1 ≤ 1 + a 1 ^ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
intro n h1 h2
case refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ∀ (n : ℕ), 2 ≤ n → ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a → ↑(n + 1) ≤ (range (n + 1)).sum a
case refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a ⊢ ↑(n + 1) ≤ (range (n + 1)).sum a
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ∀ (n : ℕ), 2 ≤ n → ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a → ↑(n + 1) ≤ (range (n + 1)).sum a TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rw [sum_range_succ, Nat.cast_succ]
case refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a ⊢ ↑(n + 1) ≤ (range (n + 1)).sum a
case refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x + a n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a ⊢ ↑(n + 1) ≤ (range (n + 1)).sum a TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rcases le_total 1 (a n) with h3 | h3
case refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x + a n
case refine_2.inl F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : 1 ≤ a n ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x + a n case refine_2.inr F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x + a n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x + a n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_right (?_ : (n : F) / a n ≤ _) _)
case refine_2.inr F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x + a n
case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ↑n / a n + a n case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inr F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x + a n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rw [div_add' _ _ _ (h n).ne.symm, le_div_iff (h n), add_one_mul (α := F), ← sub_le_iff_le_add, add_sub_assoc, ← mul_one_sub, ← le_sub_iff_add_le', ← mul_one_sub, ← sub_nonneg, ← sub_mul]
case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ↑n / a n + a n case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ 0 ≤ (↑n - a n) * (1 - a n) case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ↑n / a n + a n case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
refine mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr (h3.trans ?_)) (sub_nonneg.mpr h3)
case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ 0 ≤ (↑n - a n) * (1 - a n) case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ 1 ≤ ↑n case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ 0 ≤ (↑n - a n) * (1 - a n) case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rw [Nat.one_le_cast]
case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ 1 ≤ ↑n case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ 1 ≤ n case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ 1 ≤ ↑n case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
exact one_le_two.trans h1
case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ 1 ≤ n case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inr.refine_1 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ 1 ≤ n case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
clear h1 h2 h3
case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : a n ≤ 1 ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
induction' n with n n_ih
case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
case refine_2.inr.refine_2.zero F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ↑0 / a 0 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range 0, a x case refine_2.inr.refine_2.succ F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ n_ih : ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x ⊢ ↑(n + 1) / a (n + 1) ≤ ∑ x ∈ range (n + 1), a x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inr.refine_2 F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ ⊢ ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rw [Nat.cast_zero, sum_range_zero, zero_div]
case refine_2.inr.refine_2.zero F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ↑0 / a 0 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range 0, a x case refine_2.inr.refine_2.succ F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ n_ih : ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x ⊢ ↑(n + 1) / a (n + 1) ≤ ∑ x ∈ range (n + 1), a x
case refine_2.inr.refine_2.succ F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ n_ih : ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x ⊢ ↑(n + 1) / a (n + 1) ≤ ∑ x ∈ range (n + 1), a x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inr.refine_2.zero F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k ⊢ ↑0 / a 0 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range 0, a x case refine_2.inr.refine_2.succ F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ n_ih : ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x ⊢ ↑(n + 1) / a (n + 1) ≤ ∑ x ∈ range (n + 1), a x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
rw [sum_range_succ, add_comm _ (a n)]
case refine_2.inr.refine_2.succ F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ n_ih : ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x ⊢ ↑(n + 1) / a (n + 1) ≤ ∑ x ∈ range (n + 1), a x
case refine_2.inr.refine_2.succ F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ n_ih : ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x ⊢ ↑(n + 1) / a (n + 1) ≤ a n + ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inr.refine_2.succ F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ n_ih : ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x ⊢ ↑(n + 1) / a (n + 1) ≤ ∑ x ∈ range (n + 1), a x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
refine (h0 n).trans (add_le_add_left n_ih (a n))
case refine_2.inr.refine_2.succ F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ n_ih : ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x ⊢ ↑(n + 1) / a (n + 1) ≤ a n + ∑ x ∈ range n, a x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inr.refine_2.succ F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ n_ih : ↑n / a n ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x ⊢ ↑(n + 1) / a (n + 1) ≤ a n + ∑ x ∈ range n, a x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2015/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2015A1.final_solution
[33, 1]
[65, 53]
exact add_le_add h2 h3
case refine_2.inl F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : 1 ≤ a n ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x + a n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.inl F : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedField F a : ℕ → F h : ∀ (k : ℕ), 0 < a k h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑k.succ / a k.succ ≤ a k + ↑k / a k n : ℕ h1 : 2 ≤ n h2 : ↑n ≤ (range n).sum a h3 : 1 ≤ a n ⊢ ↑n + 1 ≤ ∑ x ∈ range n, a x + a n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_infinite_map_eq_map_zero
[31, 1]
[40, 58]
obtain ⟨n, h0, h1⟩ := h0 (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + 1)
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b : ℕ ⊢ f b = f 0
case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b n : ℕ h0 : b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + 1 ≤ n h1 : f n = f 0 ⊢ f b = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b : ℕ ⊢ f b = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_infinite_map_eq_map_zero
[31, 1]
[40, 58]
specialize h n b
case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b n : ℕ h0 : b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + 1 ≤ n h1 : f n = f 0 ⊢ f b = f 0
case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b n : ℕ h0 : b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + 1 ≤ n h1 : f n = f 0 h : ↑n - ↑b ∣ f n - f b ⊢ f b = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b n : ℕ h0 : b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + 1 ≤ n h1 : f n = f 0 ⊢ f b = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_infinite_map_eq_map_zero
[31, 1]
[40, 58]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff, lt_iff_exists_add] at h0
case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b n : ℕ h0 : b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + 1 ≤ n h1 : f n = f 0 h : ↑n - ↑b ∣ f n - f b ⊢ f b = f 0
case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b n : ℕ h0 : ∃ c > 0, n = b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + c h1 : f n = f 0 h : ↑n - ↑b ∣ f n - f b ⊢ f b = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b n : ℕ h0 : b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + 1 ≤ n h1 : f n = f 0 h : ↑n - ↑b ∣ f n - f b ⊢ f b = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_infinite_map_eq_map_zero
[31, 1]
[40, 58]
rcases h0 with ⟨C, h0, rfl⟩
case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b n : ℕ h0 : ∃ c > 0, n = b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + c h1 : f n = f 0 h : ↑n - ↑b ∣ f n - f b ⊢ f b = f 0
case intro.intro.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b C : ℕ h0 : C > 0 h1 : f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) = f 0 h : ↑(b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) - ↑b ∣ f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) - f b ⊢ f b = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b n : ℕ h0 : ∃ c > 0, n = b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + c h1 : f n = f 0 h : ↑n - ↑b ∣ f n - f b ⊢ f b = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_infinite_map_eq_map_zero
[31, 1]
[40, 58]
rw [h1, add_assoc, Nat.cast_add, add_sub_cancel_left, Int.natCast_dvd] at h
case intro.intro.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b C : ℕ h0 : C > 0 h1 : f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) = f 0 h : ↑(b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) - ↑b ∣ f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) - f b ⊢ f b = f 0
case intro.intro.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b C : ℕ h0 : C > 0 h1 : f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) = f 0 h : (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C ∣ (f 0 - f b).natAbs ⊢ f b = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b C : ℕ h0 : C > 0 h1 : f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) = f 0 h : ↑(b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) - ↑b ∣ f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) - f b ⊢ f b = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_infinite_map_eq_map_zero
[31, 1]
[40, 58]
have h2 := Nat.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt h (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right h0)
case intro.intro.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b C : ℕ h0 : C > 0 h1 : f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) = f 0 h : (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C ∣ (f 0 - f b).natAbs ⊢ f b = f 0
case intro.intro.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b C : ℕ h0 : C > 0 h1 : f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) = f 0 h : (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C ∣ (f 0 - f b).natAbs h2 : (f 0 - f b).natAbs = 0 ⊢ f b = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b C : ℕ h0 : C > 0 h1 : f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) = f 0 h : (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C ∣ (f 0 - f b).natAbs ⊢ f b = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_infinite_map_eq_map_zero
[31, 1]
[40, 58]
rwa [Int.natAbs_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm] at h2
case intro.intro.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b C : ℕ h0 : C > 0 h1 : f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) = f 0 h : (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C ∣ (f 0 - f b).natAbs h2 : (f 0 - f b).natAbs = 0 ⊢ f b = f 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h0✝ : ∀ (k : ℕ), ∃ n, k ≤ n ∧ f n = f 0 b C : ℕ h0 : C > 0 h1 : f (b + (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C) = f 0 h : (f 0 - f b).natAbs + C ∣ (f 0 - f b).natAbs h2 : (f 0 - f b).natAbs = 0 ⊢ f b = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
have h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 := λ h1 ↦ by obtain ⟨p, h2, h3⟩ := K.exists_infinite_primes exact h2.not_lt (h0 p h3 ⟨0, 0, h1⟩)
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K ⊢ ∃ C, f = fun x => C
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 ⊢ ∃ C, f = fun x => C
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K ⊢ ∃ C, f = fun x => C TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
refine const_of_infinite_map_eq_map_zero h λ k ↦ ⟨(f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k, ?_, ?_⟩
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 ⊢ ∃ C, f = fun x => C
case refine_1 f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ ⊢ k ≤ (f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 ⊢ ∃ C, f = fun x => C TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
obtain ⟨p, h2, h3⟩ := K.exists_infinite_primes
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 = 0 ⊢ False
case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 = 0 p : ℕ h2 : K ≤ p h3 : p.Prime ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 = 0 ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
exact h2.not_lt (h0 p h3 ⟨0, 0, h1⟩)
case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 = 0 p : ℕ h2 : K ≤ p h3 : p.Prime ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 = 0 p : ℕ h2 : K ≤ p h3 : p.Prime ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ <| Nat.mul_pos (Int.natAbs_pos.mpr h1) (Nat.mul_pos (Nat.succ_pos 3) K.factorial_pos)
case refine_1 f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ ⊢ k ≤ (f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ ⊢ k ≤ (f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
specialize h ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) 0
case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : ↑((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - ↑0 ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
rw [Nat.cast_zero, Int.sub_zero, Nat.cast_mul] at h
case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : ↑((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - ↑0 ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : ↑((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial)) * ↑k ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : ↑((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - ↑0 ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
apply (dvd_mul_right _ _).trans at h
case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : ↑((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial)) * ↑k ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : ↑((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial)) ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : ↑((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial)) * ↑k ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
rw [Nat.cast_mul, ← abs_dvd, Int.natCast_natAbs, abs_mul, abs_abs, ← abs_mul, abs_dvd] at h
case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : ↑((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial)) ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : f 0 * ↑(4 * K.factorial) ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : ↑((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial)) ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
obtain ⟨m, h2⟩ := dvd_sub_self_right.mp (dvd_of_mul_right_dvd h)
case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : f 0 * ↑(4 * K.factorial) ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : f 0 * ↑(4 * K.factorial) ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 m : ℤ h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : f 0 * ↑(4 * K.factorial) ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
rw [h2, ← mul_sub_one, mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h1, Int.natCast_dvd] at h
case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : f 0 * ↑(4 * K.factorial) ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 m : ℤ h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ h : f 0 * ↑(4 * K.factorial) ∣ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) - f 0 m : ℤ h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
rw [h2, mul_right_eq_self₀, or_iff_left h1]
case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0
case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ m = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
clear h1
case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ m = 1
case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ m = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K h1 : f 0 ≠ 0 k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ m = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
by_cases h1 : m.natAbs = 1
case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ m = 1
case pos f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : m.natAbs = 1 ⊢ m = 1 case neg f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : ¬m.natAbs = 1 ⊢ m = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m ⊢ m = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
rw [Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one] at h1
case pos f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : m.natAbs = 1 ⊢ m = 1
case pos f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : m = 1 ∨ m = -1 ⊢ m = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : m.natAbs = 1 ⊢ m = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
exact h1.resolve_right λ h1 ↦ absurd ((dvd_mul_right _ _).trans (h1 ▸ h)) (Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt (Nat.succ_pos 1) (Nat.le_succ 3))
case pos f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : m = 1 ∨ m = -1 ⊢ m = 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : m = 1 ∨ m = -1 ⊢ m = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
apply Nat.exists_prime_and_dvd at h1
case neg f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : ¬m.natAbs = 1 ⊢ m = 1
case neg f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : ∃ p, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ m.natAbs ⊢ m = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : ¬m.natAbs = 1 ⊢ m = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
rcases h1 with ⟨p, h1, h3⟩
case neg f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : ∃ p, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ m.natAbs ⊢ m = 1
case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : p ∣ m.natAbs ⊢ m = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m h1 : ∃ p, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ m.natAbs ⊢ m = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
specialize h0 p h1 ⟨(f 0).natAbs * (4 * Nat.factorial K) * k, h2 ▸ dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr h3) _⟩
case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : p ∣ m.natAbs ⊢ m = 1
case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : p ∣ m.natAbs h0 : p < K ⊢ m = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K : ℕ h0 : ∀ (p : ℕ), p.Prime → (∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c) → p < K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : p ∣ m.natAbs ⊢ m = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
replace h := (Nat.dvd_factorial h1.pos h0.le).trans (dvd_of_mul_left_dvd h)
case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : p ∣ m.natAbs h0 : p < K ⊢ m = 1
case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K k : ℕ m : ℤ h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : p ∣ m.natAbs h0 : p < K h : p ∣ (m - 1).natAbs ⊢ m = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K k : ℕ m : ℤ h : 4 * K.factorial ∣ (m - 1).natAbs h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : p ∣ m.natAbs h0 : p < K ⊢ m = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at h h3
case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K k : ℕ m : ℤ h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : p ∣ m.natAbs h0 : p < K h : p ∣ (m - 1).natAbs ⊢ m = 1
case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K k : ℕ m : ℤ h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : ↑p ∣ m h0 : p < K h : ↑p ∣ m - 1 ⊢ m = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K k : ℕ m : ℤ h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : p ∣ m.natAbs h0 : p < K h : p ∣ (m - 1).natAbs ⊢ m = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.const_of_finite_prime_divisor
[42, 1]
[74, 61]
exact absurd (Int.natCast_dvd.mp <| (Int.dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub h).mp h3) h1.not_dvd_one
case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K k : ℕ m : ℤ h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : ↑p ∣ m h0 : p < K h : ↑p ∣ m - 1 ⊢ m = 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro f : ℕ → ℤ K k : ℕ m : ℤ h2 : f ((f 0).natAbs * (4 * K.factorial) * k) = f 0 * m p : ℕ h1 : p.Prime h3 : ↑p ∣ m h0 : p < K h : ↑p ∣ m - 1 ⊢ m = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.final_solution
[79, 1]
[85, 68]
refine by_contra λ h1 ↦ absurd h0 (not_forall.mpr ⟨f 0, ?_⟩)
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ ⊢ ∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ h1 : ¬∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c ⊢ ¬∃ b, f b ≠ f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ ⊢ ∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.final_solution
[79, 1]
[85, 68]
rw [← not_forall, not_not]
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ h1 : ¬∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c ⊢ ¬∃ b, f b ≠ f 0
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ h1 : ¬∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c ⊢ ∀ (x : ℕ), f x = f 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ h1 : ¬∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c ⊢ ¬∃ b, f b ≠ f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.final_solution
[79, 1]
[85, 68]
suffices ∃ C, f = λ _ ↦ C from this.elim λ C this ↦ this ▸ λ x ↦ rfl
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ h1 : ¬∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c ⊢ ∀ (x : ℕ), f x = f 0
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ h1 : ¬∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c ⊢ ∃ C, f = fun x => C
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ h1 : ¬∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c ⊢ ∀ (x : ℕ), f x = f 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009N3.final_solution
[79, 1]
[85, 68]
exact const_of_finite_prime_divisor h (K := K) λ p h2 h3 ↦ lt_of_not_le λ h4 ↦ not_exists.mp h1 p ⟨h4, h2, h3⟩
f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ h1 : ¬∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c ⊢ ∃ C, f = fun x => C
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℤ h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), ↑a - ↑b ∣ f a - f b h0 : ∀ (C : ℤ), ∃ b, f b ≠ C K : ℕ h1 : ¬∃ p, K ≤ p ∧ p.Prime ∧ ∃ c, ↑p ∣ f c ⊢ ∃ C, f = fun x => C TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_eq
[61, 1]
[64, 52]
rw [f.iterate_succ_apply, h, ← h n, ← f.iterate_succ_apply']
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f n : ℕ ⊢ f^[4] (n + 1) = f^[4] n + 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f n : ℕ ⊢ f^[4] (n + 1) = f^[4] n + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_eq
[61, 1]
[64, 52]
rw [Nat.add_succ, h0, h1]
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0 : ∀ (n : ℕ), f^[4] (n + 1) = f^[4] n + 1 n : ℕ h1 : f^[4] n = f^[4] 0 + n ⊢ f^[4] n.succ = f^[4] 0 + n.succ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0 : ∀ (n : ℕ), f^[4] (n + 1) = f^[4] n + 1 n : ℕ h1 : f^[4] n = f^[4] 0 + n ⊢ f^[4] n.succ = f^[4] 0 + n.succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.good_injective
[66, 1]
[68, 76]
rwa [iter_four_eq h, iter_four_eq h n, add_right_inj] at h0
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f m n : ℕ h0 : f^[4] m = f^[4] n ⊢ m = n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f m n : ℕ h0 : f^[4] m = f^[4] n ⊢ m = n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
intro x h0
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f ⊢ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊆ {0, (f 0).succ} ∪ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ x ∈ {0, (f 0).succ} ∪ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f ⊢ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊆ {0, (f 0).succ} ∪ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_insert, mem_singleton, or_assoc]
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ x ∈ {0, (f 0).succ} ∪ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ x = 0 ∨ x = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ x ∈ {0, (f 0).succ} ∪ image Nat.succ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
refine x.eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred.imp id λ h1 ↦ ?_
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ x = 0 ∨ x = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : x = x.pred.succ ⊢ x = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ x = 0 ∨ x = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
generalize x.pred = c at h1
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : x = x.pred.succ ⊢ x = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 c : ℕ h1 : x = c.succ ⊢ x = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : x = x.pred.succ ⊢ x = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
subst h1
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 c : ℕ h1 : x = c.succ ⊢ x = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f c : ℕ h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ c.succ = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = c.succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f x : ℕ h0 : x ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 c : ℕ h1 : x = c.succ ⊢ x = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
refine (em <| c ∈ Set.range f).imp (λ h1 ↦ ?_) (λ h1 ↦ ⟨c, ?_, rfl⟩)
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f c : ℕ h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ c.succ = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = c.succ
case refine_1 f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f c : ℕ h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c ∈ Set.range f ⊢ c.succ = (f 0).succ case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f c : ℕ h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c ∉ Set.range f ⊢ c ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f c : ℕ h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ c.succ = (f 0).succ ∨ ∃ a ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl, a.succ = c.succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
rcases h1 with ⟨d, rfl⟩
case refine_1 f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f c : ℕ h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c ∈ Set.range f ⊢ c.succ = (f 0).succ
case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f c : ℕ h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c ∈ Set.range f ⊢ c.succ = (f 0).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
refine d.eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred.elim (λ h2 ↦ h2 ▸ rfl) (λ h2 ↦ ?_)
case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊢ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 ⊢ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
rw [(finChainFnOfgood h).mem_iterRangeCompl_iff] at h0
case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊢ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∉ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊢ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊢ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
refine absurd ⟨d.pred, ?_⟩ h0
case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∉ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊢ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ
case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∉ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊢ f^[3] d.pred = (f d).succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∉ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊢ (f d).succ = (f 0).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
rw [h, ← d.pred.succ_eq_add_one, ← h2]
case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∉ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊢ f^[3] d.pred = (f d).succ
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1.intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f d : ℕ h0 : (f d).succ ∉ Set.range f^[3] h2 : d = d.pred.succ ⊢ f^[3] d.pred = (f d).succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iterRangeCompl_three_subset
[78, 1]
[91, 50]
rwa [(finChainFnOfgood h).mem_rangeCompl_iff]
case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f c : ℕ h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c ∉ Set.range f ⊢ c ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f c : ℕ h0 : c.succ ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3 h1 : c ∉ Set.range f ⊢ c ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
have h0 := (card_le_card <| iterRangeCompl_three_subset h).trans <| (card_union_le _ _).trans <| Nat.add_le_add (card_pair (f 0).succ_ne_zero.symm).le card_image_le
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0 : ((finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3).card ≤ 2 + (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
rw [(finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl_card, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, mul_comm, ← Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.succ_pos 1)] at h0
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0 : ((finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3).card ≤ 2 + (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0 : ((finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 3).card ≤ 2 + (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
refine h0.eq_or_lt.elim card_eq_one.mp (λ h0 ↦ ?_)
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card < 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
rw [Nat.lt_one_iff, card_eq_zero, ← (finChainFnOfgood h).surjective_iff] at h0
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card < 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : Function.Surjective f ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card < 2 / Nat.succ 1 ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
obtain ⟨a, h0⟩ := h0.iterate 3 0
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : Function.Surjective f ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
case intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0✝¹ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0✝ : Function.Surjective f a : ℕ h0 : f^[3] a = 0 ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0✝ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0 : Function.Surjective f ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton
[93, 1]
[103, 61]
exact absurd ((h a).symm.trans h0) (f a.succ).succ_ne_zero
case intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0✝¹ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0✝ : Function.Surjective f a : ℕ h0 : f^[3] a = 0 ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f h0✝¹ : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl.card ≤ 2 / Nat.succ 1 h0✝ : Function.Surjective f a : ℕ h0 : f^[3] a = 0 ⊢ ∃ a, (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
obtain ⟨a, h0⟩ := exists_rangeCompl_eq_singleton h
f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f ⊢ f^[4] 0 = 4
case intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f a : ℕ h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊢ f^[4] 0 = 4
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f ⊢ f^[4] 0 = 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
suffices (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 = range (f^[4] 0) by rw [← card_range (f^[4] 0), ← this, (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl_card, h0, card_singleton]
case intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f a : ℕ h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊢ f^[4] 0 = 4
case intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f a : ℕ h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊢ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 = range (f^[4] 0)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f a : ℕ h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊢ f^[4] 0 = 4 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/A5/A5.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013A5.iter_four_zero_eq_four
[105, 1]
[114, 60]
ext n
case intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f a : ℕ h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊢ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 = range (f^[4] 0)
case intro.a f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f a : ℕ h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} n : ℕ ⊢ n ∈ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 ↔ n ∈ range (f^[4] 0)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro f : ℕ → ℕ h : good f a : ℕ h0 : (finChainFnOfgood h).rangeCompl = {a} ⊢ (finChainFnOfgood h).iterRangeCompl 4 = range (f^[4] 0) TACTIC: