url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
exact Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt n.succ_pos <| lt_add_of_pos_right _ (n.succ + c).succ_pos
case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1))).Prime ⊒ Β¬n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1)) ∣ n + 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1))).Prime ⊒ Β¬n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1)) ∣ n + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
intro n h0
k c : β„• h : good k c ⊒ good (k + 1) (2 * c + 1)
k c : β„• h : good k c n : β„• h0 : 0 < n ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(n + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k c : β„• h : good k c ⊒ good (k + 1) (2 * c + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
rcases n.even_or_odd' with ⟨t, rfl | rfl⟩
k c : β„• h : good k c n : β„• h0 : 0 < n ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(n + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inl k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod case intro.inr k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k c : β„• h : good k c n : β„• h0 : 0 < n ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(n + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
replace h0 := pos_of_mul_pos_right h0 (Nat.zero_le 2)
case intro.inl k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inl k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
rcases h t h0 with ⟨T, rfl, h1, h2⟩
case intro.inl k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
have X := t.add_pos_left h0 c
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
refine ⟨(2 * (t + c)) ::β‚˜ T, card_cons _ T, forall_mem_cons.mpr ⟨mul_pos (Nat.succ_pos 1) X, h1⟩, ?_⟩
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊒ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) (2 * (t + c) ::β‚˜ T)).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
rw [map_cons, prod_cons, ← h2, ← add_assoc, ← mul_add, div_mul_div_comm, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_right_comm]
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊒ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) (2 * (t + c) ::β‚˜ T)).prod
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊒ ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) / (↑2 * ↑t) = ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) * ↑(t + c) / (↑2 * ↑t * ↑(t + c))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊒ ↑(2 * t + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) (2 * (t + c) ::β‚˜ T)).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
exact (mul_div_mul_right _ _ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr X.ne.symm).symm
case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊒ ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) / (↑2 * ↑t) = ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) * ↑(t + c) / (↑2 * ↑t * ↑(t + c))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inl.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < t T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + c) / ↑t = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod X : 0 < t + c ⊒ ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) / (↑2 * ↑t) = ↑(2 * (t + c) + 1) * ↑(t + c) / (↑2 * ↑t * ↑(t + c)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
have X := t.succ_pos
case intro.inr k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inr k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inr k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
rcases h (t + 1) X with ⟨T, rfl, h1, h2⟩
case intro.inr k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inr k c : β„• h : good k c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = k + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
refine ⟨(2 * t + 1) ::β‚˜ T, card_cons _ T, forall_mem_cons.mpr ⟨(2 * t).succ_pos, h1⟩, ?_⟩
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) ((2 * t + 1) ::β‚˜ T)).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ βˆƒ S, card S = card T + 1 ∧ (βˆ€ m ∈ S, 0 < m) ∧ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) S).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
rw [map_cons, prod_cons, ← h2, add_add_add_comm, add_right_comm, add_assoc (2 * t) 1, ← mul_add_one (Ξ± := β„•), ← mul_add, div_mul_div_comm, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_right_comm]
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) ((2 * t + 1) ::β‚˜ T)).prod
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) * ↑(t + 1) / (↑(2 * t + 1) * ↑(t + 1))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ ↑(2 * t + 1 + (2 * c + 1)) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) ((2 * t + 1) ::β‚˜ T)).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.good_two_mul_add_one
[40, 1]
[60, 73]
exact (mul_div_mul_right _ _ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr X.ne.symm).symm
case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) * ↑(t + 1) / (↑(2 * t + 1) * ↑(t + 1))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.inr.intro.intro.intro c t : β„• h0 : 0 < 2 * t + 1 X : 0 < t.succ T : Multiset β„• h : good (card T) c h1 : βˆ€ m ∈ T, 0 < m h2 : ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(t + 1) = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) T).prod ⊒ ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) / ↑(2 * t + 1) = ↑2 * ↑(t + 1 + c) * ↑(t + 1) / (↑(2 * t + 1) * ↑(t + 1)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.final_solution
[63, 1]
[71, 61]
rw [pow_zero, Nat.sub_self, add_zero]
n : β„• h : 0 < n ⊒ ↑(n + (2 ^ 0 - 1)) / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) 0).prod
n : β„• h : 0 < n ⊒ ↑n / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) 0).prod
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• h : 0 < n ⊒ ↑(n + (2 ^ 0 - 1)) / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) 0).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.final_solution
[63, 1]
[71, 61]
exact div_self (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr h.ne.symm)
n : β„• h : 0 < n ⊒ ↑n / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) 0).prod
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• h : 0 < n ⊒ ↑n / ↑n = (map (fun m => ↑(m + 1) / ↑m) 0).prod TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.final_solution
[63, 1]
[71, 61]
have h := good_two_mul_add_one (final_solution k)
k : β„• ⊒ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1)
k : β„• h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) ⊒ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k : β„• ⊒ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.final_solution
[63, 1]
[71, 61]
have h0 := k.one_le_pow 2 (Nat.succ_pos 1)
k : β„• h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) ⊒ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1)
k : β„• h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) h0 : 1 ≀ 2 ^ k ⊒ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k : β„• h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) ⊒ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2013/N2/N2.lean
IMOSL.IMO2013N2.final_solution
[63, 1]
[71, 61]
rwa [two_mul, add_assoc, Nat.sub_add_cancel h0, add_comm _ (2 ^ k), ← Nat.add_sub_assoc h0, ← two_mul, ← pow_succ'] at h
k : β„• h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) h0 : 1 ≀ 2 ^ k ⊒ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k : β„• h : good (k + 1) (2 * (2 ^ k - 1) + 1) h0 : 1 ≀ 2 ^ k ⊒ good (k + 1) (2 ^ (k + 1) - 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2022/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2022A1.final_solution
[39, 1]
[52, 32]
have h2 (i : β„•) (h1 : 1 < a (i + 1)) (h2 : 1 < a (i + 2)) : False := (main_ineq h1.le h2 (h _) (h0 _)).asymm <| main_ineq2 (h i) h1 h2.le (h0 _)
R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) N : β„• h1 : 2 ≀ N ⊒ a N ≀ 1
R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) N : β„• h1 : 2 ≀ N h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False ⊒ a N ≀ 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) N : β„• h1 : 2 ≀ N ⊒ a N ≀ 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2022/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2022A1.final_solution
[39, 1]
[52, 32]
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h1 with ⟨n, rfl⟩
R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) N : β„• h1 : 2 ≀ N h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False ⊒ a N ≀ 1
case intro R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False n : β„• h1 : 2 ≀ n + 2 ⊒ a (n + 2) ≀ 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) N : β„• h1 : 2 ≀ N h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False ⊒ a N ≀ 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2022/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2022A1.final_solution
[39, 1]
[52, 32]
refine le_of_not_lt Ξ» h1 ↦ (h0 (n + 1)).not_lt ?_
case intro R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False n : β„• h1 : 2 ≀ n + 2 ⊒ a (n + 2) ≀ 1
case intro R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False n : β„• h1✝ : 2 ≀ n + 2 h1 : 1 < a (n + 2) ⊒ a (n + 1) + a (n + 1 + 2) < a (n + 1 + 1) ^ 2 + a (n + 1) * a (n + 1 + 2)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False n : β„• h1 : 2 ≀ n + 2 ⊒ a (n + 2) ≀ 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2022/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2022A1.final_solution
[39, 1]
[52, 32]
rw [← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, add_sub_assoc, ← one_sub_mul]
case intro R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False n : β„• h1✝ : 2 ≀ n + 2 h1 : 1 < a (n + 2) ⊒ a (n + 1) + a (n + 1 + 2) < a (n + 1 + 1) ^ 2 + a (n + 1) * a (n + 1 + 2)
case intro R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False n : β„• h1✝ : 2 ≀ n + 2 h1 : 1 < a (n + 2) ⊒ a (n + 1) + (1 - a (n + 1)) * a (n + 1 + 2) < a (n + 1 + 1) ^ 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False n : β„• h1✝ : 2 ≀ n + 2 h1 : 1 < a (n + 2) ⊒ a (n + 1) + a (n + 1 + 2) < a (n + 1 + 1) ^ 2 + a (n + 1) * a (n + 1 + 2) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2022/A1/A1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2022A1.final_solution
[39, 1]
[52, 32]
exact (one_lt_pow h1 <| Nat.succ_ne_zero 1).trans_le' <| add_le_of_le_sub_left <| mul_le_of_le_one_right (sub_nonneg_of_le <| le_of_not_lt <| Ξ» h3 ↦ h2 _ h3 h1) (le_of_not_lt <| h2 _ h1)
case intro R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False n : β„• h1✝ : 2 ≀ n + 2 h1 : 1 < a (n + 2) ⊒ a (n + 1) + (1 - a (n + 1)) * a (n + 1 + 2) < a (n + 1 + 1) ^ 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro R : Type u_1 inst✝ : LinearOrderedRing R a : β„• β†’ R h : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 0 ≀ a i h0 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), a (i + 1) ^ 2 + a i * a (i + 2) ≀ a i + a (i + 2) h2 : βˆ€ (i : β„•), 1 < a (i + 1) β†’ 1 < a (i + 2) β†’ False n : β„• h1✝ : 2 ≀ n + 2 h1 : 1 < a (n + 2) ⊒ a (n + 1) + (1 - a (n + 1)) * a (n + 1 + 2) < a (n + 1 + 1) ^ 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.prime_not_dvd_descFactorial
[20, 1]
[26, 47]
refine Nat.rec (Ξ» _ ↦ h.not_dvd_one) (Ξ» r h0 h1 ↦ ?_)
p : β„• h : p.Prime k : β„• ⊒ βˆ€ r < p, Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r
p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r.succ).descFactorial r.succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: p : β„• h : p.Prime k : β„• ⊒ βˆ€ r < p, Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.prime_not_dvd_descFactorial
[20, 1]
[26, 47]
rw [Nat.add_succ, Nat.succ_descFactorial_succ]
p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r.succ).descFactorial r.succ
p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r + 1) * (p * k + r).descFactorial r
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r.succ).descFactorial r.succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.prime_not_dvd_descFactorial
[20, 1]
[26, 47]
refine h.not_dvd_mul ?_ (h0 <| r.lt_succ_self.trans h1)
p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r + 1) * (p * k + r).descFactorial r
p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ p * k + r + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r + 1) * (p * k + r).descFactorial r TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.prime_not_dvd_descFactorial
[20, 1]
[26, 47]
rw [add_assoc, Nat.dvd_add_right ⟨k, rfl⟩]
p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ p * k + r + 1
p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ r + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ p * k + r + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.prime_not_dvd_descFactorial
[20, 1]
[26, 47]
exact Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt r.succ_pos h1
p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ r + 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: p : β„• h : p.Prime k r : β„• h0 : r < p β†’ Β¬p ∣ (p * k + r).descFactorial r h1 : r.succ < p ⊒ Β¬p ∣ r + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.prime_binom_not_dvd
[28, 1]
[35, 59]
apply prime_not_dvd_descFactorial h k.pred p.pred (p.pred_lt_self h.pos)
k p : β„• h : p.Prime h0 : k β‰  0 h1 : p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ False
k p : β„• h : p.Prime h0 : k β‰  0 h1 : p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ p ∣ (p * k.pred + p.pred).descFactorial p.pred
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k p : β„• h : p.Prime h0 : k β‰  0 h1 : p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.prime_binom_not_dvd
[28, 1]
[35, 59]
rw [← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (p * k.pred + p.pred).succ_pos, ← Nat.succ_descFactorial_succ, ← Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← Nat.add_succ, ← Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_pred h.ne_zero, ← p.mul_succ, Nat.succ_pred h0, Nat.descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose, mul_comm]
k p : β„• h : p.Prime h0 : k β‰  0 h1 : p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ p ∣ (p * k.pred + p.pred).descFactorial p.pred
k p : β„• h : p.Prime h0 : k β‰  0 h1 : p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ p * (p * k) ∣ p.factorial * (p * k).choose p
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k p : β„• h : p.Prime h0 : k β‰  0 h1 : p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ p ∣ (p * k.pred + p.pred).descFactorial p.pred TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.prime_binom_not_dvd
[28, 1]
[35, 59]
exact mul_dvd_mul (Nat.dvd_factorial h.pos p.le_refl) h1
k p : β„• h : p.Prime h0 : k β‰  0 h1 : p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ p * (p * k) ∣ p.factorial * (p * k).choose p
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k p : β„• h : p.Prime h0 : k β‰  0 h1 : p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ p * (p * k) ∣ p.factorial * (p * k).choose p TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
refine ⟨λ h0 ↦ ?_, Ξ» h0 n h1 ↦ ?_⟩
m : β„• h : 1 < m ⊒ (βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n)) ↔ m.Prime
case refine_1 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) ⊒ m.Prime case refine_2 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : m.Prime n : β„• h1 : 2 * n ≀ m ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: m : β„• h : 1 < m ⊒ (βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n)) ↔ m.Prime TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
by_cases h1 : 2 ∣ m
case refine_1 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) ⊒ m.Prime case refine_2 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : m.Prime n : β„• h1 : 2 * n ≀ m ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n)
case pos m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) h1 : 2 ∣ m ⊒ m.Prime case neg m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬2 ∣ m ⊒ m.Prime case refine_2 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : m.Prime n : β„• h1 : 2 * n ≀ m ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) ⊒ m.Prime case refine_2 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : m.Prime n : β„• h1 : 2 * n ≀ m ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rcases h1 with ⟨k, rfl⟩
case pos m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) h1 : 2 ∣ m ⊒ m.Prime
case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ 2 * k β†’ n ∣ n.choose (2 * k - 2 * n) ⊒ (2 * k).Prime
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) h1 : 2 ∣ m ⊒ m.Prime TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
specialize h0 k (2 * k).le_refl
case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ 2 * k β†’ n ∣ n.choose (2 * k - 2 * n) ⊒ (2 * k).Prime
case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : k ∣ k.choose (2 * k - 2 * k) ⊒ (2 * k).Prime
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ 2 * k β†’ n ∣ n.choose (2 * k - 2 * n) ⊒ (2 * k).Prime TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rw [Nat.sub_self, k.choose_zero_right, Nat.dvd_one] at h0
case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : k ∣ k.choose (2 * k - 2 * k) ⊒ (2 * k).Prime
case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : k = 1 ⊒ (2 * k).Prime
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : k ∣ k.choose (2 * k - 2 * k) ⊒ (2 * k).Prime TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rw [h0, mul_one]
case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : k = 1 ⊒ (2 * k).Prime
case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : k = 1 ⊒ Nat.Prime 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : k = 1 ⊒ (2 * k).Prime TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
exact Nat.prime_two
case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : k = 1 ⊒ Nat.Prime 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos.intro k : β„• h : 1 < 2 * k h0 : k = 1 ⊒ Nat.Prime 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
obtain ⟨p, h2, k, rfl⟩ : βˆƒ p : β„•, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ m := ⟨m.minFac, Nat.minFac_prime h.ne.symm, m.minFac_dvd⟩
case neg m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬2 ∣ m ⊒ m.Prime
case neg.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * k h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * k β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * k - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬2 ∣ p * k ⊒ (p * k).Prime
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ m β†’ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬2 ∣ m ⊒ m.Prime TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rw [Nat.two_dvd_ne_zero, ← Nat.odd_iff, Nat.odd_mul] at h1
case neg.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * k h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * k β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * k - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬2 ∣ p * k ⊒ (p * k).Prime
case neg.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * k h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * k β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * k - 2 * n) h1 : Odd p ∧ Odd k ⊒ (p * k).Prime
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * k h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * k β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * k - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬2 ∣ p * k ⊒ (p * k).Prime TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rcases h1 with ⟨-, k, rfl⟩
case neg.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * k h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * k β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * k - 2 * n) h1 : Odd p ∧ Odd k ⊒ (p * k).Prime
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) ⊒ (p * (2 * k + 1)).Prime
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * k h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * k β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * k - 2 * n) h1 : Odd p ∧ Odd k ⊒ (p * k).Prime TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
suffices k = 0 by rwa [this, mul_zero, zero_add, mul_one]
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) ⊒ (p * (2 * k + 1)).Prime
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) ⊒ k = 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) ⊒ (p * (2 * k + 1)).Prime TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
by_contra h1
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) ⊒ k = 0
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬k = 0 ⊒ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) ⊒ k = 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
apply prime_binom_not_dvd h2 h1
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬k = 0 ⊒ False
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬k = 0 ⊒ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬k = 0 ⊒ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
specialize h0 (p * k)
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬k = 0 ⊒ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h1 : Β¬k = 0 h0 : 2 * (p * k) ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * (p * k)) ⊒ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) h1 : Β¬k = 0 ⊒ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rw [mul_add_one (Ξ± := β„•), mul_left_comm, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left] at h0
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h1 : Β¬k = 0 h0 : 2 * (p * k) ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * (p * k)) ⊒ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h1 : Β¬k = 0 h0 : p * (2 * k) ≀ p * (2 * k) + p β†’ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h1 : Β¬k = 0 h0 : 2 * (p * k) ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * (p * k)) ⊒ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
exact h0 (Nat.le_add_right (p * (2 * k)) p)
case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h1 : Β¬k = 0 h0 : p * (2 * k) ≀ p * (2 * k) + p β†’ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h1 : Β¬k = 0 h0 : p * (2 * k) ≀ p * (2 * k) + p β†’ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p ⊒ p * k ∣ (p * k).choose p TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rwa [this, mul_zero, zero_add, mul_one]
p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) this : k = 0 ⊒ (p * (2 * k + 1)).Prime
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: p : β„• h2 : p.Prime k : β„• h : 1 < p * (2 * k + 1) h0 : βˆ€ (n : β„•), 2 * n ≀ p * (2 * k + 1) β†’ n ∣ n.choose (p * (2 * k + 1) - 2 * n) this : k = 0 ⊒ (p * (2 * k + 1)).Prime TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rw [le_iff_exists_add] at h1
case refine_2 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : m.Prime n : β„• h1 : 2 * n ≀ m ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n)
case refine_2 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : m.Prime n : β„• h1 : βˆƒ c, m = 2 * n + c ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : m.Prime n : β„• h1 : 2 * n ≀ m ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rcases h1 with ⟨c, rfl⟩
case refine_2 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : m.Prime n : β„• h1 : βˆƒ c, m = 2 * n + c ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n)
case refine_2.intro n c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + c h0 : (2 * n + c).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (2 * n + c - 2 * n)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 m : β„• h : 1 < m h0 : m.Prime n : β„• h1 : βˆƒ c, m = 2 * n + c ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (m - 2 * n) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
case refine_2.intro n c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + c h0 : (2 * n + c).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (2 * n + c - 2 * n)
case refine_2.intro n c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + c h0 : (2 * n + c).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose c
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro n c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + c h0 : (2 * n + c).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (2 * n + c - 2 * n) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rcases c with _ | c
case refine_2.intro n c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + c h0 : (2 * n + c).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose c
case refine_2.intro.zero n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + 0 h0 : (2 * n + 0).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose 0 case refine_2.intro.succ n c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * n + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (c + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro n c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + c h0 : (2 * n + c).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose c TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rcases n with _ | n
case refine_2.intro.succ n c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * n + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (c + 1)
case refine_2.intro.succ.zero c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * 0 + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * 0 + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ 0 ∣ Nat.choose 0 (c + 1) case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ n + 1 ∣ (n + 1).choose (c + 1)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro.succ n c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * n + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose (c + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rw [Nat.add_zero, Nat.prime_mul_iff] at h0
case refine_2.intro.zero n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + 0 h0 : (2 * n + 0).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose 0
case refine_2.intro.zero n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + 0 h0 : Nat.Prime 2 ∧ n = 1 ∨ n.Prime ∧ 2 = 1 ⊒ n ∣ n.choose 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro.zero n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + 0 h0 : (2 * n + 0).Prime ⊒ n ∣ n.choose 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rcases h0 with ⟨-, rfl⟩ | ⟨-, h1⟩
case refine_2.intro.zero n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + 0 h0 : Nat.Prime 2 ∧ n = 1 ∨ n.Prime ∧ 2 = 1 ⊒ n ∣ n.choose 0
case refine_2.intro.zero.inl.intro h : 1 < 2 * 1 + 0 ⊒ 1 ∣ Nat.choose 1 0 case refine_2.intro.zero.inr.intro n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + 0 h1 : 2 = 1 ⊒ n ∣ n.choose 0
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro.zero n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + 0 h0 : Nat.Prime 2 ∧ n = 1 ∨ n.Prime ∧ 2 = 1 ⊒ n ∣ n.choose 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
exacts [Nat.dvd_refl 1, absurd h1 (Nat.succ_ne_self 1)]
case refine_2.intro.zero.inl.intro h : 1 < 2 * 1 + 0 ⊒ 1 ∣ Nat.choose 1 0 case refine_2.intro.zero.inr.intro n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + 0 h1 : 2 = 1 ⊒ n ∣ n.choose 0
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro.zero.inl.intro h : 1 < 2 * 1 + 0 ⊒ 1 ∣ Nat.choose 1 0 case refine_2.intro.zero.inr.intro n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * n + 0 h1 : 2 = 1 ⊒ n ∣ n.choose 0 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
exact Nat.dvd_refl 0
case refine_2.intro.succ.zero c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * 0 + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * 0 + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ 0 ∣ Nat.choose 0 (c + 1)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro.succ.zero c : β„• h : 1 < 2 * 0 + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * 0 + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ 0 ∣ Nat.choose 0 (c + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
refine (Nat.Coprime.dvd_mul_right ?_).mp ⟨_, (n.succ_mul_choose_eq c).symm⟩
case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ n + 1 ∣ (n + 1).choose (c + 1)
case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ (n + 1).Coprime c.succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ n + 1 ∣ (n + 1).choose (c + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rw [two_mul, add_assoc] at h0
case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ (n + 1).Coprime c.succ
case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1))).Prime ⊒ (n + 1).Coprime c.succ
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1)).Prime ⊒ (n + 1).Coprime c.succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
rw [← Nat.coprime_self_add_right, ← Nat.coprime_self_add_right, Nat.coprime_comm, h0.coprime_iff_not_dvd]
case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1))).Prime ⊒ (n + 1).Coprime c.succ
case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1))).Prime ⊒ Β¬n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1)) ∣ n + 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1))).Prime ⊒ (n + 1).Coprime c.succ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2012/N3/N3.lean
IMOSL.IMO2012N3.final_solution
[38, 1]
[77, 52]
exact Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt n.succ_pos <| lt_add_of_pos_right _ (n.succ + c).succ_pos
case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1))).Prime ⊒ Β¬n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1)) ∣ n + 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2.intro.succ.succ c n : β„• h : 1 < 2 * (n + 1) + (c + 1) h0 : (n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1))).Prime ⊒ Β¬n + 1 + (n + 1 + (c + 1)) ∣ n + 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.and_and_or_not_iff
[36, 1]
[39, 48]
rw [and_assoc, and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff, and_assoc, and_comm (b := Q)]
P Q R : Prop ⊒ (P ∧ Q) ∧ (R ∨ Β¬Q) ↔ (P ∧ R) ∧ Q
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P Q R : Prop ⊒ (P ∧ Q) ∧ (R ∨ Β¬Q) ↔ (P ∧ R) ∧ Q TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.Iic_filter_dvd_card
[41, 1]
[47, 45]
let h := (k + (n + 1)).card_multiples (n + 1)
k n : β„• ⊒ (filter (fun i => n + 1 ∣ i + 1) (Icc k (k + n))).card = 1
k n : β„• h : (filter (fun e => n + 1 ∣ e + 1) (range (k + (n + 1)))).card = (k + (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := Nat.card_multiples (k + (n + 1)) (n + 1) ⊒ (filter (fun i => n + 1 ∣ i + 1) (Icc k (k + n))).card = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k n : β„• ⊒ (filter (fun i => n + 1 ∣ i + 1) (Icc k (k + n))).card = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.Iic_filter_dvd_card
[41, 1]
[47, 45]
rwa [range_eq_Ico, ← Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico k.zero_le le_self_add, filter_union, card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter <| Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive 0 k _), ← range_eq_Ico, Nat.card_multiples, k.add_div_right n.succ_pos, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_right_inj] at h
k n : β„• h : (filter (fun e => n + 1 ∣ e + 1) (range (k + (n + 1)))).card = (k + (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := Nat.card_multiples (k + (n + 1)) (n + 1) ⊒ (filter (fun i => n + 1 ∣ i + 1) (Icc k (k + n))).card = 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k n : β„• h : (filter (fun e => n + 1 ∣ e + 1) (range (k + (n + 1)))).card = (k + (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := Nat.card_multiples (k + (n + 1)) (n + 1) ⊒ (filter (fun i => n + 1 ∣ i + 1) (Icc k (k + n))).card = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.symmDiff_card_add_two_mul_inter_card
[61, 1]
[64, 62]
rw [two_mul, ← add_assoc, ← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_symmDiff_inter A B), symmDiff_union_inter_eq_union, card_union_add_card_inter]
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : DecidableEq α A B : Finset α ⊒ (symmDiff A B).card + 2 * (A ∩ B).card = A.card + B.card
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝ : DecidableEq α A B : Finset α ⊒ (symmDiff A B).card + 2 * (A ∩ B).card = A.card + B.card TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.symmDiff_card_mod_two
[66, 1]
[67, 73]
rw [← symmDiff_card_add_two_mul_inter_card, Nat.add_mul_mod_self_left]
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : DecidableEq α A B : Finset α ⊒ (symmDiff A B).card % 2 = (A.card + B.card) % 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝ : DecidableEq α A B : Finset α ⊒ (symmDiff A B).card % 2 = (A.card + B.card) % 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.filter_symmDiff
[74, 1]
[78, 60]
rw [mem_filter, mem_symmDiff, mem_symmDiff, mem_filter, mem_filter, not_and_or, not_and_or, and_and_or_not_iff, and_and_or_not_iff, ← or_and_right]
Ξ± : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq Ξ± A B : Finset Ξ± p : Ξ± β†’ Prop inst✝ : DecidablePred p x : Ξ± ⊒ x ∈ filter p (symmDiff A B) ↔ x ∈ symmDiff (filter p A) (filter p B)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: Ξ± : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq Ξ± A B : Finset Ξ± p : Ξ± β†’ Prop inst✝ : DecidablePred p x : Ξ± ⊒ x ∈ filter p (symmDiff A B) ↔ x ∈ symmDiff (filter p A) (filter p B) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.Ends_iff
[126, 1]
[132, 47]
rw [mem_range, ← not_le]
n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board ⊒ i ∈ range n
n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬n ≀ i
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board ⊒ i ∈ range n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.Ends_iff
[126, 1]
[132, 47]
refine Ξ» h1 ↦ h _ <| ValidMove.flip (i - n) ?_
n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬n ≀ i
n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board h1 : n ≀ i ⊒ i - n + n ∈ X.board
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬n ≀ i TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.Ends_iff
[126, 1]
[132, 47]
rwa [Nat.sub_add_cancel h1]
n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board h1 : n ≀ i ⊒ i - n + n ∈ X.board
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board h1 : n ≀ i ⊒ i - n + n ∈ X.board TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
rcases h with ⟨i, h⟩
n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.ValidMove Y ⊒ { ofColex := Y.board } < { ofColex := X.board }
case flip n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { ofColex := { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board } < { ofColex := X.board }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.ValidMove Y ⊒ { ofColex := Y.board } < { ofColex := X.board } TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
refine Colex.toColex_lt_toColex.mpr ⟨?_, Ξ» j h0 h1 ↦ ?_⟩
case flip n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { ofColex := { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board } < { ofColex := X.board }
case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board β‰  X.board case flip.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ βˆƒ b ∈ X.board, b βˆ‰ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board ∧ j ≀ b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { ofColex := { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board } < { ofColex := X.board } TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
rw [Ne, symmDiff_eq_left]
case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board β‰  X.board
case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬Icc i (i + n) = βŠ₯
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board β‰  X.board TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
exact ne_empty_of_mem (left_mem_Icc.mpr le_self_add)
case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬Icc i (i + n) = βŠ₯
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬Icc i (i + n) = βŠ₯ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
refine ⟨i + n, h, Ξ» h2 ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
case flip.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ βˆƒ b ∈ X.board, b βˆ‰ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board ∧ j ≀ b
case flip.refine_2.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board h2 : i + n ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board ⊒ False case flip.refine_2.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ j ≀ i + n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ βˆƒ b ∈ X.board, b βˆ‰ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board ∧ j ≀ b TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
rw [mem_symmDiff, mem_Icc] at h2
case flip.refine_2.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board h2 : i + n ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board ⊒ False
case flip.refine_2.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board h2 : i + n ∈ X.board ∧ Β¬(i ≀ i + n ∧ i + n ≀ i + n) ∨ (i ≀ i + n ∧ i + n ≀ i + n) ∧ i + n βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip.refine_2.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board h2 : i + n ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board ⊒ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
exact h2.elim (Ξ» h2 ↦ h2.2 ⟨le_self_add, (i + n).le_refl⟩) (Ξ» h2 ↦ h2.2 h)
case flip.refine_2.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board h2 : i + n ∈ X.board ∧ Β¬(i ≀ i + n ∧ i + n ≀ i + n) ∨ (i ≀ i + n ∧ i + n ≀ i + n) ∧ i + n βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip.refine_2.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board h2 : i + n ∈ X.board ∧ Β¬(i ≀ i + n ∧ i + n ≀ i + n) ∨ (i ≀ i + n ∧ i + n ≀ i + n) ∧ i + n βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
rw [mem_symmDiff, or_iff_right (Ξ» h2 ↦ h1 h2.1), mem_Icc] at h0
case flip.refine_2.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ j ≀ i + n
case flip.refine_2.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : (i ≀ j ∧ j ≀ i + n) ∧ j βˆ‰ X.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ j ≀ i + n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip.refine_2.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ j ≀ i + n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
exact h0.1.2
case flip.refine_2.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : (i ≀ j ∧ j ≀ i + n) ∧ j βˆ‰ X.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ j ≀ i + n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip.refine_2.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : (i ≀ j ∧ j ≀ i + n) ∧ j βˆ‰ X.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ j ≀ i + n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.isReachable_sum_two_pow_add_numMoves
[155, 1]
[162, 60]
rw [ValidMove_numMoves h0, ← add_assoc, Nat.succ_le_iff]
n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.IsReachable Y a✝ c✝ : GameState n h0 : a✝.ValidMove c✝ x✝ : ReflTransGen ValidMove c✝ Y h1 : βˆ‘ i ∈ Y.board, 2 ^ i + Y.numMoves ≀ βˆ‘ i ∈ c✝.board, 2 ^ i + c✝.numMoves ⊒ βˆ‘ i ∈ c✝.board, 2 ^ i + c✝.numMoves ≀ βˆ‘ i ∈ a✝.board, 2 ^ i + a✝.numMoves
n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.IsReachable Y a✝ c✝ : GameState n h0 : a✝.ValidMove c✝ x✝ : ReflTransGen ValidMove c✝ Y h1 : βˆ‘ i ∈ Y.board, 2 ^ i + Y.numMoves ≀ βˆ‘ i ∈ c✝.board, 2 ^ i + c✝.numMoves ⊒ βˆ‘ i ∈ c✝.board, 2 ^ i + a✝.numMoves < βˆ‘ i ∈ a✝.board, 2 ^ i + a✝.numMoves
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.IsReachable Y a✝ c✝ : GameState n h0 : a✝.ValidMove c✝ x✝ : ReflTransGen ValidMove c✝ Y h1 : βˆ‘ i ∈ Y.board, 2 ^ i + Y.numMoves ≀ βˆ‘ i ∈ c✝.board, 2 ^ i + c✝.numMoves ⊒ βˆ‘ i ∈ c✝.board, 2 ^ i + c✝.numMoves ≀ βˆ‘ i ∈ a✝.board, 2 ^ i + a✝.numMoves TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.isReachable_sum_two_pow_add_numMoves
[155, 1]
[162, 60]
exact Nat.add_lt_add_right (ValidMove_sum_two_pow h0) _
n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.IsReachable Y a✝ c✝ : GameState n h0 : a✝.ValidMove c✝ x✝ : ReflTransGen ValidMove c✝ Y h1 : βˆ‘ i ∈ Y.board, 2 ^ i + Y.numMoves ≀ βˆ‘ i ∈ c✝.board, 2 ^ i + c✝.numMoves ⊒ βˆ‘ i ∈ c✝.board, 2 ^ i + a✝.numMoves < βˆ‘ i ∈ a✝.board, 2 ^ i + a✝.numMoves
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.IsReachable Y a✝ c✝ : GameState n h0 : a✝.ValidMove c✝ x✝ : ReflTransGen ValidMove c✝ Y h1 : βˆ‘ i ∈ Y.board, 2 ^ i + Y.numMoves ≀ βˆ‘ i ∈ c✝.board, 2 ^ i + c✝.numMoves ⊒ βˆ‘ i ∈ c✝.board, 2 ^ i + a✝.numMoves < βˆ‘ i ∈ a✝.board, 2 ^ i + a✝.numMoves TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_central_card_mod_two
[178, 1]
[183, 50]
rw [centralCards, filter_symmDiff, ← centralCards, symmDiff_card_mod_two, Iic_filter_dvd_card]
n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.ValidMove Y i : β„• x✝ : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.centralCards.card % 2 = (X.centralCards.card + 1) % 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.ValidMove Y i : β„• x✝ : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.centralCards.card % 2 = (X.centralCards.card + 1) % 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.isReachable_central_card_add_numMoves_mod_two
[185, 1]
[192, 58]
rw [ValidMove_numMoves h0, Nat.add_mod, ValidMove_central_card_mod_two h0, ← Nat.add_mod, add_add_add_comm, Nat.add_mod_right]
n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.IsReachable Y a✝ c✝ : GameState n h0 : a✝.ValidMove c✝ x✝ : ReflTransGen ValidMove c✝ Y h1 : (Y.centralCards.card + Y.numMoves) % 2 = (c✝.centralCards.card + c✝.numMoves) % 2 ⊒ (c✝.centralCards.card + c✝.numMoves) % 2 = (a✝.centralCards.card + a✝.numMoves) % 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.IsReachable Y a✝ c✝ : GameState n h0 : a✝.ValidMove c✝ x✝ : ReflTransGen ValidMove c✝ Y h1 : (Y.centralCards.card + Y.numMoves) % 2 = (c✝.centralCards.card + c✝.numMoves) % 2 ⊒ (c✝.centralCards.card + c✝.numMoves) % 2 = (a✝.centralCards.card + a✝.numMoves) % 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.numMoves_mod_two_eq_div_of_ends
[205, 1]
[210, 60]
have h1 := isReachable_central_card_add_numMoves_mod_two h
M n : β„• X : GameState n h : (init M n).IsReachable X h0 : X.Ends ⊒ X.numMoves % 2 = M / n.succ % 2
M n : β„• X : GameState n h : (init M n).IsReachable X h0 : X.Ends h1 : (X.centralCards.card + X.numMoves) % 2 = ((init M n).centralCards.card + (init M n).numMoves) % 2 ⊒ X.numMoves % 2 = M / n.succ % 2
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M n : β„• X : GameState n h : (init M n).IsReachable X h0 : X.Ends ⊒ X.numMoves % 2 = M / n.succ % 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.numMoves_mod_two_eq_div_of_ends
[205, 1]
[210, 60]
rwa [filter_central_init_card, numMoves_init, Nat.add_zero, filter_central_ends h0, card_empty, Nat.zero_add] at h1
M n : β„• X : GameState n h : (init M n).IsReachable X h0 : X.Ends h1 : (X.centralCards.card + X.numMoves) % 2 = ((init M n).centralCards.card + (init M n).numMoves) % 2 ⊒ X.numMoves % 2 = M / n.succ % 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: M n : β„• X : GameState n h : (init M n).IsReachable X h0 : X.Ends h1 : (X.centralCards.card + X.numMoves) % 2 = ((init M n).centralCards.card + (init M n).numMoves) % 2 ⊒ X.numMoves % 2 = M / n.succ % 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.and_and_or_not_iff
[36, 1]
[39, 48]
rw [and_assoc, and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff, and_assoc, and_comm (b := Q)]
P Q R : Prop ⊒ (P ∧ Q) ∧ (R ∨ Β¬Q) ↔ (P ∧ R) ∧ Q
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P Q R : Prop ⊒ (P ∧ Q) ∧ (R ∨ Β¬Q) ↔ (P ∧ R) ∧ Q TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.Iic_filter_dvd_card
[41, 1]
[47, 45]
let h := (k + (n + 1)).card_multiples (n + 1)
k n : β„• ⊒ (filter (fun i => n + 1 ∣ i + 1) (Icc k (k + n))).card = 1
k n : β„• h : (filter (fun e => n + 1 ∣ e + 1) (range (k + (n + 1)))).card = (k + (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := Nat.card_multiples (k + (n + 1)) (n + 1) ⊒ (filter (fun i => n + 1 ∣ i + 1) (Icc k (k + n))).card = 1
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k n : β„• ⊒ (filter (fun i => n + 1 ∣ i + 1) (Icc k (k + n))).card = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.Iic_filter_dvd_card
[41, 1]
[47, 45]
rwa [range_eq_Ico, ← Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico k.zero_le le_self_add, filter_union, card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter <| Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive 0 k _), ← range_eq_Ico, Nat.card_multiples, k.add_div_right n.succ_pos, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_right_inj] at h
k n : β„• h : (filter (fun e => n + 1 ∣ e + 1) (range (k + (n + 1)))).card = (k + (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := Nat.card_multiples (k + (n + 1)) (n + 1) ⊒ (filter (fun i => n + 1 ∣ i + 1) (Icc k (k + n))).card = 1
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: k n : β„• h : (filter (fun e => n + 1 ∣ e + 1) (range (k + (n + 1)))).card = (k + (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := Nat.card_multiples (k + (n + 1)) (n + 1) ⊒ (filter (fun i => n + 1 ∣ i + 1) (Icc k (k + n))).card = 1 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.symmDiff_card_add_two_mul_inter_card
[61, 1]
[64, 62]
rw [two_mul, ← add_assoc, ← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_symmDiff_inter A B), symmDiff_union_inter_eq_union, card_union_add_card_inter]
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : DecidableEq α A B : Finset α ⊒ (symmDiff A B).card + 2 * (A ∩ B).card = A.card + B.card
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝ : DecidableEq α A B : Finset α ⊒ (symmDiff A B).card + 2 * (A ∩ B).card = A.card + B.card TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.symmDiff_card_mod_two
[66, 1]
[67, 73]
rw [← symmDiff_card_add_two_mul_inter_card, Nat.add_mul_mod_self_left]
α : Type u_1 inst✝ : DecidableEq α A B : Finset α ⊒ (symmDiff A B).card % 2 = (A.card + B.card) % 2
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: α : Type u_1 inst✝ : DecidableEq α A B : Finset α ⊒ (symmDiff A B).card % 2 = (A.card + B.card) % 2 TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.filter_symmDiff
[74, 1]
[78, 60]
rw [mem_filter, mem_symmDiff, mem_symmDiff, mem_filter, mem_filter, not_and_or, not_and_or, and_and_or_not_iff, and_and_or_not_iff, ← or_and_right]
Ξ± : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq Ξ± A B : Finset Ξ± p : Ξ± β†’ Prop inst✝ : DecidablePred p x : Ξ± ⊒ x ∈ filter p (symmDiff A B) ↔ x ∈ symmDiff (filter p A) (filter p B)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: Ξ± : Type u_1 inst✝¹ : DecidableEq Ξ± A B : Finset Ξ± p : Ξ± β†’ Prop inst✝ : DecidablePred p x : Ξ± ⊒ x ∈ filter p (symmDiff A B) ↔ x ∈ symmDiff (filter p A) (filter p B) TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.Ends_iff
[126, 1]
[132, 47]
rw [mem_range, ← not_le]
n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board ⊒ i ∈ range n
n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬n ≀ i
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board ⊒ i ∈ range n TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.Ends_iff
[126, 1]
[132, 47]
refine Ξ» h1 ↦ h _ <| ValidMove.flip (i - n) ?_
n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬n ≀ i
n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board h1 : n ≀ i ⊒ i - n + n ∈ X.board
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬n ≀ i TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.Ends_iff
[126, 1]
[132, 47]
rwa [Nat.sub_add_cancel h1]
n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board h1 : n ≀ i ⊒ i - n + n ∈ X.board
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X : GameState n h : X.Ends i : β„• h0 : i ∈ X.board h1 : n ≀ i ⊒ i - n + n ∈ X.board TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
rcases h with ⟨i, h⟩
n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.ValidMove Y ⊒ { ofColex := Y.board } < { ofColex := X.board }
case flip n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { ofColex := { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board } < { ofColex := X.board }
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: n : β„• X Y : GameState n h : X.ValidMove Y ⊒ { ofColex := Y.board } < { ofColex := X.board } TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
refine Colex.toColex_lt_toColex.mpr ⟨?_, Ξ» j h0 h1 ↦ ?_⟩
case flip n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { ofColex := { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board } < { ofColex := X.board }
case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board β‰  X.board case flip.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ βˆƒ b ∈ X.board, b βˆ‰ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board ∧ j ≀ b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { ofColex := { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board } < { ofColex := X.board } TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
rw [Ne, symmDiff_eq_left]
case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board β‰  X.board
case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬Icc i (i + n) = βŠ₯
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board β‰  X.board TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
exact ne_empty_of_mem (left_mem_Icc.mpr le_self_add)
case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬Icc i (i + n) = βŠ₯
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board ⊒ Β¬Icc i (i + n) = βŠ₯ TACTIC:
https://github.com/mortarsanjaya/IMOSLLean4.git
be127d301e366822fbeeeda49d9fd5b998fb4eb5
IMOSLLean4/IMO2009/C1/C1.lean
IMOSL.IMO2009C1.GameState.ValidMove_Colex
[138, 1]
[148, 19]
refine ⟨i + n, h, Ξ» h2 ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
case flip.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ βˆƒ b ∈ X.board, b βˆ‰ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board ∧ j ≀ b
case flip.refine_2.refine_1 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board h2 : i + n ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board ⊒ False case flip.refine_2.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ j ≀ i + n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case flip.refine_2 n : β„• X : GameState n i : β„• h : i + n ∈ X.board j : β„• h0 : j ∈ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board h1 : j βˆ‰ X.board ⊒ βˆƒ b ∈ X.board, b βˆ‰ { board := symmDiff X.board (Icc i (i + n)), numMoves := X.numMoves.succ }.board ∧ j ≀ b TACTIC: